25-0009 Asbestos and Lead Survey.pdf

ASBESTOS AND LEAD SURVEY

BEQ FC555

MARINE CORPS BASE (MCB) CAMP LEJEUNE

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28547

ECS PROJECT NO. 49:26338

FOR: MBF ARCHITECTS PA

DECEMBER 17, 2025

Braxton B. Dawson Lindsey Thompson, REM Environmental Project Manager Environmental Principal bdawson@ecslimited.com lthompson@ecslimited.com 910-686-9114 864-987-1810

December 17, 2025 Mr. Bill Faulkenberry MBF Architects PA 317-C Pollock Street New Bern, North Carolina 28560 faulkenberry@mbfarchitects.com

ECS Project No. 49:26338

Reference: Asbestos and Lead Survey, BEQ FC555, Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Lejeune, Jacksonville, North Carolina

Dear Mr. Faulkenberry:

ECS Southeast, LLC (ECS) is pleased to provide MBF Architects PA with the results of the above referenced Asbestos and Lead Survey performed for the renovation of BEQ FC555 located at Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, North Carolina. This report summarizes our observations, analytical results, findings, and recommendations related to the work performed. The work described in this report was performed by ECS in general accordance with the Scope of Services described in ECS Proposal Number 49:50147P and the terms and conditions of the agreement authorizing those services.

ECS appreciates this opportunity to provide MBF Architects PA with our services. If we can be of further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely, ECS Southeast, LLC

6714 Netherlands Drive, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 • T:910-686-9114 NC Engineering No. F-1519 NC Geology No. C-553

ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid-Atlantic LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Pacific, Inc. • ECS Southeast, LLC • ECS Southwest, LLP

ECS New York Engineering, PLLC - An Associate of ECS Group of Companies • ecslimited.com

"ONE FIRM. ONE MISSION."

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The subject property is improved with a Bachelor Enlisted Quarters located at Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina. The structure consists of 45,231 square feet and was reportedly originally constructed in 1978. At the time of our survey, FC555 was occupied, and is currently scheduled to be renovated.

The purpose of the survey was to determine whether asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), lead-containing paint (LCP), and visible mold, were present on the subject property. The survey was performed within the interior and exterior areas of the subject building as well as the roof.

Asbestos Survey

On September 11, 2025, Mr. Braxton B. Dawson, a North Carolina-certified inspector, performed the initial asbestos assessment. A subsequent destructive sampling scope was performed on November 24, 2025 to determine if damp-proofing on CMU behind exterior brick veneer contained asbestos.

The destructive assessment also included shower pans and vanity mirrors inside the living quarters.

Bulk samples were submitted to Scientific Analytical Institute (SAI) in Greensboro, North Carolina for analysis via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) in accordance with the current EPA-600 methodology.

A total of 46 bulk samples from 19 homogeneous areas during the first sampling event were submitted to the laboratory, of which 46 layers were analyzed. For destructive testing, 4 more bulk samples from 2 homogeneous areas were submitted to the laboratory, of which 6 additional layers were analyzed.

The following materials were reported to be asbestos-containing from the first sampling event:

• Parapet Wall Flashing; Attic, 4,500 SF

The following materials were reported to be asbestos-containing from the second destructive sampling event:

• CMU Damp Proofing; behind brick veneer; 20,000 SF

Due to inaccessibility or the destructive means that asbestos sampling requires, unseen ACMs may remain within the building hidden behind inaccessible areas, which include, but are not limited to, sub-grade walls, structural members, topping slabs, sub-grade sealants, flooring located below underlayments, areas behind exterior walls, pipe trenches, and subsurface utilities.

If suspect materials are discovered during construction activities, they should be presumed to contain asbestos and be treated as ACMs or be sampled immediately upon discovery and prior to disturbance for asbestos content by an accredited or certified asbestos inspector in accordance with 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1926.1101.

Lead Paint Survey

December 17, 2025 ii

The lead paint assessment was conducted by the collection of paint chip samples from suspect lead paint materials. The paint chip samples were submitted to a laboratory that participates in the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Environmental Lead Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) Program for analysis of lead concentration (percent by weight) using Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy.

Based on the laboratory analysis of the paint chips collected during the survey, the following building components were reported as lead-containing paint:

• Gray/Yellow Attic Access Ladder

• Beige Living Quarters Beige Door Frames

• Yellow Exterior Stairwell/Sidewalk Yellow Stair Risers

Paint and surface coatings that contain detectable concentrations of lead are considered “lead-containing paints.” Since OSHA has no specific action level for lead in paint, all paint on the site found to have a measurable concentration of lead should be assumed to be lead-containing. Work performed that may disturb lead-containing paint is regulated under OSHA, as referenced under 29

CFR 1926.62.

Recommendations regarding the removal and disposal of the ACM, LCP, and visual mold identified by ECS can be found in Section 5.0 of this report.

The executive summary is an integral portion of this report; however, ECS recommends that the report be read in its entirety.

iii

PAGETABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.0 PURPOSE

3.0 METHODOLOGY

3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

3.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

3.3 Mold and Moisture

4.0 RESULTS

4.1 Asbestos Sampling

4.2 Suspect or Assumed Asbestos-Containing Materials

4.3 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

4.4 Mold and Moisture

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

5.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

6.0 LIMITATIONS

iv

TABLE OF APPENDICES

Appendix I: Figures

Appendix II: Site Photographs

Appendix III: Asbestos Bulk Sample Results

Appendix IV: Lead Laboratory Analytical Results

Appendix V: Certifications/Licenses

Appendix VI: Previous Reports v

1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

The subject property is developed with a Bachelor's Enlisted Quarters (BEQ), Building FC555 located at Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina. Based on the information available, BEQ FC555 comprises approximately 45,231 square feet and was reportedly built in 1978. ECS was requested to conduct an asbestos and lead paint survey, as well as a visual mold survey prior to the proposed renovations. The exterior is comprised of a brick facade, with slab-on-grade, and a metal roof on FC555. Interior finishes consist of suspended ceiling tiles, concrete masonry unit (CMU) block, drywall, ceiling texture, and vinyl composite tile (VCT) floors.

2.0 PURPOSE

The purpose of the Asbestos and Lead Survey was to identify asbestos-containing materials (ACM), lead-containing paint (LCP), and visible mold which require special handling and/or disposal if disturbed during construction activities. The identification of ACMs require trained labor, regulated work practices, and special disposal. The identification of LCP or other lead hazards requires disclosure to contractors and monitoring of lead exposure.

3.0 METHODOLOGY

ECS performed the authorized Scope of Services in general accordance with our proposal, standard industry practice(s) and methods specified by regulation(s) for the identification of ACMs, LCPs, and visible mold.

3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

The non-invasive asbestos survey was performed by Mr. Braxton B. Dawson (NC Asbestos Inspector No. 12830) on September 11, 2025. The survey consisted of observing the accessible areas of the building for the presence of suspect materials that may contain asbestos. The survey involved detecting both friable materials (materials that can be pulverized or reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry) and non-friable materials (materials that pose a hazard when sawn, sanded, drilled, or pulverized). Homogeneous materials (based on material type, color, texture, etc.) were identified during the survey. A subsequent destructive sampling scope was performed on November 24, 2025 to determine if damp-proofing on CMU behind exterior brick veneer contained asbestos.

The destructive assessment also included shower pans and vanity mirrors inside the living quarters.

The EPA National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requires a survey for asbestos before renovation or demolition. Demolition is defined under NESHAP as the removal of a load-bearing structural member, and renovation is an action that disturbs building materials. Based on requirements under NESHAP and North Carolina Asbestos Hazard Management Program (AHMP), administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit (HHCU) for renovation or demolition activities, ECS conducted a limited survey for potential ACM. The ACM survey was limited in that we did not conduct demolition, such as jack/sledgehammering, to expose potentially concealed materials. Samples were collected in general accordance with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Standard 40 CFR 763 Subpart E, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standard 29 CFR 1926.1101 Inspection Protocol.

December 17, 2025

ECS Project # 49:26338

Representative bulk samples were collected, placed in sealed packages, and submitted to SAI for analysis using the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended method of Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining (Method No. EPA 600/R-93/116). SAI participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). Their NVLAP accreditation number is 200664-0. Several of the samples were layered and analyzed as multiple samples. EPA regulations require collecting multiple samples of each homogeneous area for laboratory analysis. The material type, sample location, and analytical results of each bulk sample are also summarized in the attached Asbestos Bulk Analysis report in Appendices.

During the survey, ECS attempted to identify suspect ACMs in readily accessible areas. However, due to the destructive means required to identify some materials, certain areas were deemed inaccessible (i.e. behind walls or sub grade materials) and were not surveyed for suspect ACMs.

Samples were collected in general accordance with EPA Standard 40 CFR 763 Subpart E, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.1101 Inspection Protocol.

Multiple samples of each unique material were submitted. Samples were analyzed using the “Positive Stop” methodology. If one sample of a homogeneous material is reported to contain asbestos, the remaining samples of that material are not analyzed. EPA regulations stipulate that if one sample contains asbestos, the entire quantity of that material contains asbestos, regardless of additional analysis.

3.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

ECS completed a lead paint screening within the building as part of our assessment activities. The collection of representative paint chip samples was performed throughout the building renovation areas. Samples collected were containerized, labeled, and transported to SAI. Each of the paint chip samples was subsequently analyzed for the presence of lead, reported in percent lead by weight, via EPA Method SW 846, 7000B (Flame AAS). The chain-of-custody, which includes sample numbers and sample locations, is included in an Appendix of this report.

3.3 Mold and Moisture

ECS visually inspected the subject property for evidence of mold. This included inspecting the accessible areas of the structures for fungal growth with the naked eye.

As is the case with many assessments of this nature, this evaluation was limited to the areas of the property deemed reasonably accessible by ECS. Reasonable effort was made to identify mold and moisture-impacted areas. However, mold/moisture-impacted areas may remain unidentified.

4.0 RESULTS

The following is a summary of laboratory results, findings and observations.

4.1 Asbestos Sampling

In total, 46 bulk samples from 19 homogeneous areas were submitted to the laboratory, of which 46 layers were analyzed from the first sampling event. For destructive testing, 4 more bulk samples from 2 homogeneous areas were submitted to the laboratory, of which 6 additional layers were analyzed.

December 17, 2025

An ACM is defined as any material containing more than one percent (>1%) asbestos as determined using the method specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR Part 763, Section 1, PLM. The U.S. EPA categorizes ACM as follows:

• Friable ACMs are defined as any ACM that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Non-friable ACMs are defined as any ACM that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

• Category I non-friable ACM includes packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, and asphalt roofing products containing more than one percent (>1%) asbestos.

• Category II non-friable ACM is listed as any material, excluding Category I non-friable ACM, containing more than one percent (>1%) asbestos.

Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) are friable ACM or non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, or has crumbled, been pulverized, or reduced to powder in the course of renovation and/or demolition operations.

SAI submitted a signed final laboratory report to ECS on September 19, 2025 and December 8, 2025. Two of the bulk sampled materials submitted for analysis were reported to contain asbestos in detectable concentrations. A complete list of the sampled materials submitted for analysis and sample locations is included below. Photographs of representative building materials are located in Appendix II of this report.

Asbestos Bulk Sample Locations and Analysis Results

Sample ID Material

Description Sample

Location Analytical

Results Category

Estimated Quantity

First Sampling Event

555-1-1,2 Pinhole Ceiling Tiles

Common Areas

None Detected

(ND)

Not Applicable (N/A)

N/A

555-2-1,2 Fissure Ceiling Tiles

Common Areas

ND N/A N/A

555-3-1,2 Floor Coating

Common Areas

ND N/A N/A

555-4-1,2,3, 4,5

Block Coating

Interior Walls

ND N/A N/A

555-5-1,2 12X12 Beige Floor Tile

Living Quarters

ND N/A N/A

555-6-1,2 Gray Mastic Fan Vent - Chases

ND N/A N/A

555-7-1,2 Built up Roof

Attic ND N/A N/A

December 17, 2025

Sample ID Material

Description Sample

Location Analytical

Results Category

Estimated Quantity

555-8-1,2 Tar Paper and Tar

Under Standing Seam Metal Roof

ND N/A N/A

555-9-1,2 Caulk Exterior Windows & Doors

ND N/A N/A

555-10-1,2 Caulk Exterior Expansion Joints

ND N/A N/A

555-11-1,2 Smooth Ceiling Tiles

Interior Hallways

ND N/A N/A

555-12-1,2 Parapet Wall Flashing - Top Layer

Attic 3% Chrysotile

Category I, Non-Friabl e

4,500 Square Feet

555-13-1,2 Flashing - Bottom Layer

Attic ND N/A N/A

555-14-1,2 Caulk Interior Joints

ND N/A N/A

555-15-1,2 Drywall & Joint Comound

Living Quarters

ND N/A N/A

555-16-1,2 Fire Caulk Mechanical Room Penetration s

ND N/A N/A

555-17-1,2,3 ,4, 5,6,7

Ceiling Texture

Mechanical Rooms, Buildings, & Living Quarters

ND N/A N/A

555-18-1,2 Caulk Exterior Brick

ND N/A N/A

December 17, 2025

Sample ID Material

Description Sample

Location Analytical

Results Category

Estimated Quantity

555-19-1,2 White TSI Mastic

Mechanical Rooms & Building

ND N/A N/A

Second, Destructive Sampling Event

3-1,2 Shower Pan Membrane & Mastic

Private Bathrooms in Living Quarters

Membrane -

ND

Mastic - ND

N/A N/A

4-1,2 CMU Damp Proofing

Exterior

CMU

behind brick veneer

8% Chrysotile

Category II, Non- Friable

20,000 SF

Bold = Asbestos-Containing Materials

The approximate quantities of the identified ACMs are for informational purposes only and should not be used for bidding purposes. ECS does not warranty or guarantee the estimated quantities provided. The contractors bidding on asbestos abatement should visit the site before bidding to field verify the actual quantity of ACM, become familiar with the site conditions, and address any technical or engineering considerations concerning asbestos removal in their bids or estimates. Any similar materials located on the property should also be assumed to contain asbestos unless tested and the laboratory analysis indicates that asbestos is not present.

4.2 Suspect or Assumed Asbestos-Containing Materials

Due to the inaccessibility or the destructive means that asbestos sampling requires, additional suspect ACMs may remain within the building hidden behind inaccessible areas that include but are not limited to, sub-grade walls, structural members, topping slabs, sub-grade sealants, flooring located below underlayments, areas behind exterior walls, pipe trenches, and subsurface utilities, etc.

These areas were deemed inaccessible and were not assessed.

If these materials are discovered during construction activities, they should be presumed to contain asbestos and be treated as ACMs or sampled immediately upon discovery and prior to disturbance for asbestos content by a certified asbestos inspector in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101.

December 17, 2025

A subsequent destructive sampling scope was performed by ECS and MBF Architects on November 24, 2025 to determine if damp-proofing on CMU behind exterior brick veneer contained asbestos.

The destructive assessment also included shower pans and vanity mirrors inside the living quarters.

The results of the destructive testing are as followed:

• ACM damp-proofing was identified on CMU walls behind the exterior brick veneer.

• The shower pan membrane and mastic in the private bathrooms were sampled and determined to be negative for asbestos.

• The vanity mirrors in the living quarters were determined to be mechanically fastened.

Mirror mastic was not observed.

4.3 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

Paint and surface coatings that contain detectable concentrations of lead are considered to be “lead-containing paints” (LCP). Because OSHA has no specific action level for lead in paint, all paint on the site found to have measurable lead concentrations should be assumed to be lead-containing.

Work performed that may disturb lead-containing paint is regulated under OSHA, as referenced under 29 CFR 1926.62.

Lead was detected in the paint chip samples analyzed. The identified lead-containing paints are summarized in the table below, and the photographs are located in the appendix.

Summary Paint Chip Sampling Results

Sample ID Location Substrate Component Condition Color Result

PC-1 Attic Access

Metal Ladder Good Gray/ Yellow

0.20%

PC-2 Exterior Common Areas

Metal Door Frame

Good Brown <0.0075%

PC-3 Exterior Common Areas

Metal Door Good Brown <0.0066%

PC-4 Interior Common Areas

Metal Door Frame

Good Brown <0.0078%

PC-5 Interior Common Areas

Metal Door Good Brown <0.0056%

PC-6 1st Floor Lounge

Metal Door Frame

Good Black <0.0036%

December 17, 2025

Sample ID Location Substrate Component Condition Color Result

PC-7 1st Floor Lounge

Metal Door Good Black <0.0059%

PC-8 Stairwell Concrete Stair Riser Good Red <0.0068%

PC-9 Duty Office

Metal Door Frame

Good Red <0.0068

PC-10 Living Quarters

CMU Wall Good Beige <0.0051%

PC-11 Mechanic al Rooms

CMU Wall Good White <0.0048%

PC-12 Exterior Living Quarters

Metal Door Good Brown <0.0045%

PC-13 Exterior Living Quarters

Metal Door Frame

Good Brown <0.0060

PC-14 Interior Living Quarters

Metal Door Good Beige <0.012%

PC-15 Interior Living Quarters

Metal Door Frame

Good Beige 0.010%

PC-16 Mechanic al Room

Metal Double Door

Good Brown <0.0067

PC-17 Mechanic al Room

Metal Double Door Frame

Good Brown <0.0065

PC-18 Mechanic al Building

Metal Door Frame

Good Brown <0.0059%

PC-19 Mechanic al Building

Metal Door Good Brown <0.0057%

PC-20 Mechanic al Building 2

Metal Door Good Brown <0.0049%

December 17, 2025

Sample ID Location Substrate Component Condition Color Result

PC-21 Mechanic al Building 2

Metal Door Frame

Good Brown <0.0077

PC-22 End Stairwell s & Sidewalk

Concrete Stair Risers

Good Yellow 0.067%

PC-23 Laundry Room

Metal Pipe Good Red <0.0052%

PC-24 Laundry Room

CMU Wall Good White <0.0056%

PC-25 Janitor's Closet

CMU Wall Good Beige <0.0054%

PC-26 1st Floor Common Areas

Metal Doors Good Blue <0.0060%

PC-27 1st Floor Common Areas

Metal Door Frames

Good Blue <0.0069%

Bold = Lead-Containing Paint

4.4 Mold and Moisture

Based on the visual mold assessment conducted on September 11, 2025, ECS presents a summary of observations below:

• Visible mold growth was observed on the mechanical building's fiberglass insulation, drywall ceiling, and piping.

• Occupants reported signs of visible mold growth in the bathrooms.

Representative photographs of the observed mold/moisture-impacted areas/materials are attached to this report. Approximate locations of the building materials and areas with visible mold are indicated on the site layout provided in the Appendix of this report.

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

Based on our understanding of the purpose of the Asbestos and Lead Survey, the results of laboratory analysis, and our findings and observations, ECS presents the following recommendations.

December 17, 2025

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

ECS recommends where a material type has been identified as asbestos-containing that, other materials with similar color, texture, age, and size throughout the building’s interior and exterior be assumed to contain asbestos. Please refer to Section 4.1 for a complete list of building materials reported positive for asbestos and Section 4.2 for materials assumed to contain asbestos. Identified ACMs must be removed, encapsulated, or enclosed before disturbance of the materials.

If ACMs are to be removed, an accredited asbestos abatement contractor should perform the removal. it is recommended that an industrial hygienist monitor the project. This involves collecting air samples from within and outside abatement work areas to monitor the asbestos abatement contractor’s work practices throughout the project. The industrial hygienist should evaluate if the asbestos abatement work is in accordance with project specifications, U.S. EPA regulation 40 CFR Part 61-NESHAP Subpart M: National Emission Standard for Asbestos, and OSHA regulation 29 CFR

1926.1101 – Asbestos in Construction. The industrial hygienist should assess each work area to monitor the removal of ACMs. Only after the industrial hygienist has determined the identified ACMs have been removed should final clearance air samples be collected (if necessary).

Suspect ACMs not observed due to inaccessibility or not sampled due to the destructive means that sampling would require may also be encountered during construction activities. At the time of the survey, only limited destructive means were used to locate or sample suspect ACMs; therefore, additional suspect ACMs may remain within inaccessible areas that include, but are not limited to, sub-grade walls, structural members, topping slabs, exterior areas, sub-grade sealants, flooring located below underlayments, vapor barriers, pipe trenches, and other subsurface utilities, etc.

If additional suspect ACMs are uncovered which were not accessible during this survey, it is recommended that these materials either be assumed to contain asbestos or be sampled before disturbance upon discovery for asbestos content by an asbestos inspector in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101.

ECS recommends that a project specification be prepared to delineate and quantify known and suspect hazardous and regulated materials in the buildings and to outline proper procedures for the abatement. This will help protect the owner’s liability in better defining the scope of work and contractors’ roles and responsibilities in the abatement process and holding the contractor accountable for the performance of the project. The specification typically defines the Contractor’s scope of work and outline requirements and procedures that must be followed for the project. The intent of the specification is to give performance requirements for the Contractor so that the project can be completed safely and in compliance with applicable federal and state regulations. Typically, the specification document serves as part of the site owner’s contract with the contractor.

5.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

Based on the findings of the lead survey, detectable concentrations of lead were identified on some paints and surface coatings.

The presence of lead is a concern primarily when conditions exist where it may be inhaled or ingested.

Regardless of the analytical results of a material, all painted and/or glazed surfaces may still contain concentrations of lead in the paint, which when disturbed, may generate lead dust greater than

December 17, 2025 the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) as an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA) established by the OSHA “Lead Exposure in Construction Rule (29 CFR 1926.62).”

The OSHA standard gives no guidance on acceptable levels of lead in paint at which no exposure to airborne lead (above the action level) would be expected. Rather, OSHA defines airborne concentrations, and references specific types of work practices and operations from which a lead hazard may be generated (reference 29 CFR 1926.62, section d). Environmental and personnel monitoring should be conducted during any removal/demolition process (as appropriate) to verify that actual personal exposures are below the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) as an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA). Under OSHA requirements, the contractor performing renovation work will be required to conduct this monitoring and follow applicable requirements under 29 CFR 1926.62 if disturbing lead-containing paint.

6.0 LIMITATIONS

The conclusions and recommendations presented within this report are based upon a reasonable level of assessment within normal bounds and standards of professional practice for a site in this particular geographic setting. ECS is not responsible or liable for the discovery and elimination of hazards that may potentially cause damage, accidents, or injuries.

The observations, conclusions, and recommendations pertaining to environmental conditions at the subject site are necessarily limited to conditions observed, and/or materials reviewed at the time this study was undertaken. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made with regard to the conclusions and recommendations presented within this report. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client. This report is not intended to be used or relied upon in connection with other projects or by other unidentified third parties without the written consent of ECS and the client.

During this study, samples were submitted for analysis at an accredited laboratory via polarized light microscopy. As with any similar survey of this nature, actual conditions exist only at the precise locations from which samples were collected. Certain inferences are based on the results of this sampling and related testing to form a professional opinion of conditions in areas beyond those from which the samples were collected. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made.

Our recommendations are in part based on federal, state, and local regulations and guidelines. ECS does not assume the responsibility of the person(s) in charge of the site, or otherwise undertake responsibility for reporting to any local, state, or federal public agencies, any conditions at the site that may present a potential danger to public health, safety, or the environment. Under this scope of services, ECS assumes no responsibility regarding any response actions initiated as a result of these findings. General compliance with regulations and response actions are the sole responsibility of the Client and should be conducted in accordance with local, state, and/or federal requirements.

December 17, 2025

Appendix I: Figures

Hazardous Materials Survey

Figure 1

Site Overview

BEQ FC555

MCB Camp Lejune

Jacksonville, North Carolina

ECS Project No. 49-26338

IMAGE SOURCE:

Google Earth

Subject Structure

ACM Damp Proofing

NOTES:

Floor plan not to scale.

Hazardous Materials Survey

Figure 2

Asbestos Sample Locations

BEQ FC555

MCB Camp Lejune

Jacksonville, North Carolina

ECS Project No. 49-26338

1st Floor

555-19-2

555-19-1

555-18-1

555-17-5

555-17-7

555-17-6

555-15-2

555-15-1

555-11-2555-6-1

555-4-2

555-4-1

555-1-1

555-5-2

555-5-1

Mechanical Buildings

4-1

4-2

3-1 3-2

XX-XX

SAMPLE LEGEND:

Sample Location

Asbestos Not Detected

Asbestos Detected >1%

ACM Damp Proofing

Floor plan not to scale.

Hazardous Materials Survey

Figure 3

Asbestos Sample Locations

BEQ FC555

MCB Camp Lejune

Jacksonville, North Carolina

ECS Project No. 49-26338

2nd Floor

555-18-2

555-17-2

555-17-1

555-16-2 555-14-1

555-11-1

555-10-2

555-9-1

555-6-2

555-4-4

555-4-3

555-3-1

555-2-2

XX-XX

SAMPLE LEGEND:

Sample Location

Floor plan not to scale.

Hazardous Materials Survey

Figure 4

Asbestos Sample Locations

BEQ FC555

MCB Camp Lejune

Jacksonville, North Carolina

ECS Project No. 49-26338

3rd Floor

555-17-4

555-17-3 555-16-1

555-14-2

555-10-1555-9-2

555-4-5

555-3-2

555-2-1

555-1-2

ACM Damp Proofing

XX-XX

SAMPLE LEGEND:

Sample Location

ACM Flashing

Floor plan not to scale.

Hazardous Materials Survey

Figure 5

Asbestos Sample Locations

BEQ FC555

MCB Camp Lejune

Jacksonville, North Carolina

ECS Project No. 49-26338

XX-XX

SAMPLE LEGEND:

Sample Location

Asbestos Not Detected

Asbestos Detected >1%

555-12-2555-12-1

555-8-2

Roof/Attic

555-8-1

555-7-2555-7-1

555-13-2 555-13-1

Hazardous Materials Survey

Figure 6

Lead Sample Locations

BEQ FC555

MCB Camp Lejune

Jacksonville, North Carolina

ECS Project No. 49-26338

SAMPLE LEGEND:

Lead-Containing Paint

Below Detection Limit

NOTES:

Floor plan not to scale.

XX

PC-8

PC-10

PC-9

PC-7

PC-6

PC-4

PC-5

1st Floor

PC-18,19PC-20,21

PC-27

PC-26

Hazardous Materials Survey

Figure 7

Lead Sample Locations

BEQ FC555

MCB Camp Lejune

Jacksonville, North Carolina

ECS Project No. 49-26338

SAMPLE LEGEND:

Lead-Containing Paint

Below Detection Limit

NOTES:

Floor plan not to scale.

XX

PC-9

PC-11

PC-24

2nd Floor

PC-15

PC-17

PC-16

PC-14

PC-13

PC-12

PC-11

Hazardous Materials Survey

Figure 8

Lead Sample Locations

BEQ FC555

MCB Camp Lejune

Jacksonville, North Carolina

ECS Project No. 49-26338

SAMPLE LEGEND:

Lead-Containing Paint

Below Detection Limit

NOTES:

Floor plan not to scale.

XX

PC-9

PC-11

PC-2

PC-25

PC-23

PC-1

3rd Floor

PC-22

PC-3

Appendix II: Site Photographs

1 - View of BEQ FC555

2 - View of Old Mechanical Building

ECS Project No. 49:26338

3 - View of New mechanical building

4 - View of Visible Mold

5 - View of Typical Mechanical Room & Visible Mold

6 - View of Typical HVAC System in Mechanical Room

7 - View of ceiling texture in mechanical plenum in each room

8 - View of Typical Living Quarters

9 - View of Metal Attic-Roof Hatch Ladder

10 - View of Mechanical Room Attic Access Ladder - Lead-Containing Paint

11 - View of Typical Chase

12 - View of Typical Exterior

13 - View of Typical, Central Mechanical Room

14 - View of Typical Cleaning Storage Room

15 - View of Typical Laundry Room

16 - View of Typical Common Hallway

17 - View of Typical Lounge

18 - View of Typical Chase

19 - View of ACM damp-proofing on CMU behind brick veneer

20 - Old mech room

21 - View of typical vanity mirrors - Mechanically fastened

22 - View of non-ACM shower pan membrane and mastic

23 - View of ACM flashing in attic

Appendix III: Asbestos Bulk Sample Results

Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10092033Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405

Analysis:

Date Received:

Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor

PLM

09/12/2025

Project: BEQ FC550 & FC555- Hazmat Assessment Camp Lejune, NC

Date Reported: 09/19/2025

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

555-1-1

10092033_0001

Pinhole Ceiling Tile

None Detected 60% 20%

Cellulose Fiber Glass

10% 10%

Perlite Other

Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous

555-1-2

10092033_0002

Pinhole Ceiling Tile

None Detected 60% 20%

Cellulose Fiber Glass

10% 10%

Perlite Other

Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous

555-2-1

10092033_0003

Fissure Ceiling Tile

None Detected 60% 20%

Cellulose Fiber Glass

10% 10%

Other Perlite

Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous

555-2-2

10092033_0004

Fissure Ceiling Tile

None Detected 60% 20%

Cellulose Fiber Glass

10% 10%

Other Perlite

Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous

555-3-1

10092033_0005

Floor Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

555-3-2

10092033_0006

Floor Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

555-4-1

10092033_0007

Block Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Tan

Homogeneous

555-4-2

10092033_0008

Block Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Tan

Homogeneous

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.

Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Jalen Moore (101)

Analyst Approved Signatory

Page 1 of 13P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10092033Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405

Analysis:

Date Received:

Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor

PLM

09/12/2025

Project: BEQ FC550 & FC555- Hazmat Assessment Camp Lejune, NC

Date Reported: 09/19/2025

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

555-4-3

10092033_0009

Block Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Tan

Homogeneous

555-4-4

10092033_0010

Block Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Tan

Homogeneous

555-4-5

10092033_0011

Block Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Tan

Homogeneous

555-5-1

10092033_0012

12X12 Beige Floor Tile

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Gray

Homogeneous

555-5-2

10092033_0013

12X12 Beige Floor Tile

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Gray

Homogeneous

555-6-1

10092033_0014

Gray, Fan Vent Mastic

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Gray

Homogeneous

555-6-2

10092033_0015

Gray, Fan Vent Mastic

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Gray

Homogeneous

555-7-1

10092033_0016

Built Up Roof

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Black

Homogeneous

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.

Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Jalen Moore (101)

Page 2 of 13P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10092033Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405

Analysis:

Date Received:

Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor

PLM

09/12/2025

Project: BEQ FC550 & FC555- Hazmat Assessment Camp Lejune, NC

Date Reported: 09/19/2025

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

555-7-2

10092033_0017

Built Up Roof

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Black

Homogeneous

555-8-1

10092033_0018

Tar Paper & Tar

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Black

Homogeneous no paper

555-8-2

10092033_0019

Tar Paper & Tar

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Black

Homogeneous no paper

555-9-1

10092033_0020

Caulk

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Brown

Homogeneous

555-9-2

10092033_0021

Caulk

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Brown

Homogeneous

555-10-1

10092033_0022

Caulk

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Gray

Homogeneous

555-10-2

10092033_0023

Caulk

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Gray

Homogeneous

555-11-1

10092033_0024

Smooth Ceiling Tiles

None Detected 5% Cellulose 95% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.

Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Jalen Moore (101)

Page 3 of 13P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10092033Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405

Analysis:

Date Received:

Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor

PLM

09/12/2025

Project: BEQ FC550 & FC555- Hazmat Assessment Camp Lejune, NC

Date Reported: 09/19/2025

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

555-11-2

10092033_0025

Smooth Ceiling Tiles

None Detected 5% Cellulose 95% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

555-12-1

10092033_0026

Flashing - Top Layer

3% Chrysotile 97% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Silver

Homogeneous

555-12-2

10092033_0027

Flashing - Top Layer

Not Analyzed

555-13-1

10092033_0028

Flashing - Bottom layer

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Black

Homogeneous

555-13-2

10092033_0029

Flashing - Bottom layer

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Black

Homogeneous

555-14-1

10092033_0030

Caulk

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous

555-14-2

10092033_0031

Caulk

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous

555-15-1

10092033_0032

Drywall & Joint Compound

None Detected 5% Cellulose 95% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Heterogeneous drywall: none detected; joint compound: none detected

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.

Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Jalen Moore (101)

Page 4 of 13P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10092033Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405

Analysis:

Date Received:

Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor

PLM

09/12/2025

Project: BEQ FC550 & FC555- Hazmat Assessment Camp Lejune, NC

Date Reported: 09/19/2025

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

555-15-2

10092033_0033

Drywall & Joint Compound

None Detected 5% Cellulose 95% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Heterogeneous drywall: none detected; joint compound: none detected

555-16-1

10092033_0034

Fire Caulk

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Red

Homogeneous

555-16-2

10092033_0035

Fire Caulk

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Red

Homogeneous

555-17-1

10092033_0036

Ceiling Texture

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

555-17-2

10092033_0037

Ceiling Texture

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

555-17-3

10092033_0038

Ceiling Texture

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

555-17-4

10092033_0039

Ceiling Texture

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

555-17-5

10092033_0040

Ceiling Texture

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.

Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Jalen Moore (101)

Page 5 of 13P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10092033Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405

Analysis:

Date Received:

Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor

PLM

09/12/2025

Project: BEQ FC550 & FC555- Hazmat Assessment Camp Lejune, NC

Date Reported: 09/19/2025

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

555-17-6

10092033_0041

Ceiling Texture

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

555-17-7

10092033_0042

Ceiling Texture

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

555-18-1

10092033_0043

Caulk

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Gray

Homogeneous

555-18-2

10092033_0044

Caulk

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Gray

Homogeneous

555-19-1

10092033_0045

White TSI Mastic

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Beige

Homogeneous

555-19-2

10092033_0046

White TSI Mastic

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Beige

Homogeneous

550-01-1

10092033_0047

Fissure Ceiling Tile

None Detected 60% 20%

Cellulose Fiber Glass

10% 10%

Perlite Other

Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous

550-01-2

10092033_0048

Fissure Ceiling Tile

None Detected 60% 20%

Cellulose Fiber Glass

10% 10%

Perlite Other

Fibrous

Ashed

Green, White

Homogeneous

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.

Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Jalen Moore (101)

Page 6 of 13P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10092033Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405

Analysis:

Date Received:

Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor

PLM

09/12/2025

Project: BEQ FC550 & FC555- Hazmat Assessment Camp Lejune, NC

Date Reported: 09/19/2025

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

550-02-1

10092033_0049

Solid Ceiling Tile

None Detected 5% Cellulose 95% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

550-02-2

10092033_0050

Solid Ceiling Tile

None Detected 5% Cellulose 95% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

550-03-1

10092033_0051

Caulk

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous

550-03-2

10092033_0052

Caulk

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous

550-04-1

10092033_0053

Block Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Beige

Homogeneous

550-04-2

10092033_0054

Block Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Beige

Homogeneous

550-04-3

10092033_0055

Block Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Beige

Homogeneous

550-04-4

10092033_0056

Block Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Beige

Homogeneous

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.

Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Jalen Moore (101)

Page 7 of 13P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10092033Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405

Analysis:

Date Received:

Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor

PLM

09/12/2025

Project: BEQ FC550 & FC555- Hazmat Assessment Camp Lejune, NC

Date Reported: 09/19/2025

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

550-04-5

10092033_0057

Block Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Beige

Homogeneous

550-04-6

10092033_0058

Block Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Beige

Homogeneous

550-04-7

10092033_0059

Block Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Beige

Homogeneous

550-05-1

10092033_0060

Pinhole Ceiling Tile

None Detected 60% 20%

Cellulose Fiber Glass

10% 10%

Perlite Other

Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous

550-05-2

10092033_0061

Pinhole Ceiling Tile

None Detected 60% 20%

Cellulose Fiber Glass

10% 10%

Other Perlite

Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous

550-06-1

10092033_0062

Floor Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

550-06-2

10092033_0063

Floor Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

550-06-3

10092033_0064

Floor Coating

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

White

Homogeneous

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.

Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Jalen Moore (101)

Page 8 of 13P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10092033Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405

Analysis:

Date Received:

Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor

PLM

09/12/2025

Project: BEQ FC550 & FC555- Hazmat Assessment Camp Lejune, NC

Date Reported: 09/19/2025

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

550-07-1

10092033_0065

Pipe Mastic

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Gray

Homogeneous

550-07-2

10092033_0066

Pipe Mastic

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Gray

Homogeneous

550-08-1

10092033_0067

White TSI Mastic

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous

550-08-2

10092033_0068

White TSI Mastic

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous

550-09-1

10092033_0069

Flashing

2% Chrysotile 98% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Silver, Brown

Homogeneous

550-09-2

10092033_0070

Flashing

Not Analyzed

550-10-1

10092033_0071

Built Up Roof

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Black

Homogeneous

550-10-2

10092033_0072

Built Up Roof

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Black

Homogeneous

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM.