14_C-5 SDC QASP.pdf

PR: FD2060-21-33081, QASP

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for

C-5M Supplemental Depot Capability (SDC)

Purchase Request: FD2060-21-33081

23 March 2022

FD2060-21-33081 QASP

1.0 Purpose

This QASP is a Government-developed document used to determine if the contractor’s performance meets the performance standards contained in the contract. The QASP establishes procedures on how this assessment/inspection process will be conducted. It provides the details associated with a continuous oversight process, to include:

• What will be monitored

• How monitoring will take place

• Who will conduct the monitoring

• How monitoring efforts and results will be documented

1.1 The contractor is responsible for implementing and delivering performance that meets contract standards using its own quality control plan. The QASP provides the structure for the Government’s surveillance of the contractor’s performance to ensure that it meets contract standards. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair and consistent in evaluating contractor performance.

1.2 The QASP is not part of the contract nor is it intended to duplicate the contractor’s quality control plan. This QASP is a living document. Flexibility in the QASP is required to allow for an increase or decrease in the level of surveillance necessary based on contractor performance. Copies of the QASP and any revisions shall be provided to the contractor and the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) to facilitate implementation of surveillance activities. In addition, the QASP should recognize and accommodate unforeseen or uncontrollable circumstances which might occur that are outside the control of the contractor.

1.3 Objectives

The objective of this effort is to a Supplemental Depot Capability (SDC) for C-5M inspections, heavy maintenance, repairs, and modifications. SDC shall encompass C-5M Programmed Depot Maintenance (PDM), Lavatory Modifications (LAV Mod), overfly inspections, and unscheduled inspections/repairs/maintenance to be accomplished. Additional flexibility is necessary to accommodate options for FS 2538.00 Dorsal Complex (batman fitting) and Pylon-Wing Interface (PWI) repairs, crown skins replacement, and other potential future C-5M inspections, heavy maintenance, repairs, and modifications. This QASP will enable the Multi-Functional Team (MFT) to ensure that supplies and services acquired under this contract/task order (TO) conform to the performance metrics identified in this QASP’s Services Summary (SS) Table.

1.4 Result(s)

The QASP is used for managing contractor performance assessment by ensuring that systematic quality assurance methods validate that contractor quality control efforts are timely, effective, and are delivering the results specified in the contract/task order (TO). The QASP directly corresponds to the performance objectives and standards specified in the Performance-based Work Statement (PWS). It provides specific details on how the Government will survey, observe, test, sample, evaluate, and document contractor performance results to determine if the contractor has met the required performance standards for each objective in the PWS. Successful completion of the objectives for the performance of the contract constitutes success of the program.

1.5 Authority

Generally, Authority for issuance of this QASP is provided under Part 46 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Inspection of Services clauses, which provide for inspection, acceptance and documentation of the services called for in the contract/TO. If commercial, quality assurance will be applied IAW commercial items clause.

2.0 Assessment Management

2.1 Services Summary (SS)

Performance Objective PWS Ref Performance Threshold Method of Surveillance

Order Accuracy/Timeliness

4.2.5

There shall be no impacts to the critical path of an aircraft’s production plan, as a result of items ordered inaccurately or in an un-timely manner.

Surveillance will be conducted by the COR reviewing CDRL A003, DI-MGMT-80004A

Management Plan/Programmed Depot Maintenance and CDRL

A004, DI-PSSS-81995A/T

Contract Depot Maintenance (CDM) Monthly Production Report/ Programmed Depot Maintenance upon receipt.

Surveillance will be documented by the COR in the applicable quarterly PAR(s).

Category Defect Findings for PDM

4.10.1 No Critical Findings during

customer post- PDM inspections are permissible per aircraft.

No more than one Major finding during customer post-PDM inspections are permissible per aircraft.

No more than five Minor findings during customer post-PDM inspections are permissible per aircraft.

Surveillance will be conducted by the representatives from DCMA and the FCF flight crew by performing on-site inspections of repaired assets.

Surveillance will be documented by the COR in the applicable quarterly PAR(s).

Quality and Workmanship Deficiencies

4.12.1 The quality deficiency rate shall be

<.5% per contract year per each individual aircraft work package.

The Contractor shall provide corrective action and actions taken to prevent recurrence on all Acceptance Inspection Deficiency Reports (AIDR) In Accordance With (IAW) Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) A00C within three (3) business days of receipt of the

AIDR.

Surveillance will be conducted upon receipt of the AIDR by the

COR.

Surveillance will be documented by the COR in the applicable quarterly PAR(s).

Maintenance Data Documentation (MDD)

4.16 The Contractor shall maintain 100%

compliance with all MDD documentation. All MDD corrections shall be completed within ten (10) business days.

Surveillance will be conducted, at a minimum monthly, by the COR and other MFT representatives monitoring the maintenance data in requisite MDD systems (IMDS Central Database, G081, CEMS, AWBS, and/or REMIS) , review of CDRLs A00C, A00D, A00F, and Physical inspection of each aircraft 781 forms binder/jacket MDD records.

in the applicable quarterly PAR(s).

Quality of CDRL deliverable

4.17.2 There shall be no more than

one (1) rejection of any deliverable. There shall be no more than two (2) total rejections of deliverables per Task Order. All rejected deliverables shall be corrected and resubmitted within ten (10) business days of notification.

Surveillance will be conducted by the COR reviewing all CDRLs upon receipt.

Surveillance will be documented by the COR in the applicable quarterly PAR(s).

Receipt of CDRL deliverables

4.17.3

There shall be no more than one (1) late submission of deliverables per conducted by the COR task order. monitoring receipt of deliverables.

Surveillance will be documented by the COR in the applicable

Compliance with Technical Data

4.22.3

100% compliance with all published USAF Technical Data procedures, instructions, and directives. Requests for deviations [Technical Assistance Requests IAW AF Material Command (AFMC) Form 202] must be approved by the USG prior to any deviation work.

All work shall be performed using latest version of the USAF publication(s) and engineering dispositions, as directed.

Surveillance will be conducted by DCMA with a minimum sample of 20% of the work performed for contractor compliance with all published USAF Technical Data procedures, instructions, and directives.

Surveillance will be documented by the COR in the applicable

Aircraft Flow Days 4.23.1

The Contractor shall complete each aircraft work package per scheduled negotiated flow days within each individual Task Order.

Surveillance will be conducted by the COR monthly reviewing C-5 SDC Production Status Report/Briefing [CDRL

A003, DI-MGMT-

80004A Management Plan/ Programmed Depot Maintenance (PDM) Production Plan]

[CDRL A004, DI-PSSS-

81995A/T Contract Depot Maintenance (CDM) Monthly Production Report/ Programmed Depot Maintenance (PDM)].

Surveillance will be in the applicable quarterly

Unscheduled inspections, repairs/maintenance Request for Order Proposal (RFOP) response time

4.7.1 The Contractor shall provide the

Government a proposal for unscheduled inspections, repairs/maintenance no later than thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the Government’s request for proposal.

Surveillance will be conducted by the COR reviewing the Contractor’s proposal when received within thirty (30) calendar days from the Request for Proposal.

Surveillance will be documented by the COR

Adherence to Contractor Quality Management System

(QMS)

5.6 100% compliance with the QMS is required.

Surveillance will be conducted by the COR reviewing the contractor’s QMS to ensure that it is effective in bringing the desired results (performance is equal to or greater than the SS metrics).

Surveillance will be documented by the COR

Service Contract Reporting (SCR)

5.10, 5.10.1, 5.10.2, 5.10.3, 5.10.4

The Contractor shall report all SCR data for each fiscal year including a count of contractor/subcontractor personnel performing services; all contractor labor hours, including subcontractor labor hours; the total amount invoiced; and any required Tier 1 subcontractor information for each fiscal year in SAM.

Surveillance will be conducted by the COR and/or PCO monitoring

SAM.

Surveillance will be documented by the COR

2.2 COR Online File Documentation

The COR will establish and maintain an online file containing training and surveillance documentation (COR Profile and COR Online File in Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE). At a minimum, the following documentation will be uploaded in the PIEE by the COR or PCO as applicable.

a. COR Information (COR Profile) Training and Appointment DAU CLC 222 COR Online Training DAU CLM 003 Overview of Acquisition Ethics DOD 0020 Combatting Human Trafficking for DOD Acquisition Professionals SYS600 Wide Area Workflow Intro Course Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC) - Led Training (Level C) Contract-Specific Training Refresher Training

b. QASP

c. Designation of COR

d. Annual COR File Inspection Checklist(s)

e. CPR ONLINE FILE:

i. COR Status Reports/Surveillance:

Performance Assessment Reports (PARs) Corrective Action Reports (CAR)

ii. COR Trip Reports (if applicable)

iii. COR Correspondence Reports

− Meeting Minutes

− Contractor Correspondence

iv. Miscellaneous Documents:

a. Contract, including modifications (if not in Electronic Access Document (EDA))

b. PWS, including revisions (if not in EDA)

c. Amended QASP

d. DD Form 254 (if not in EDA)

e. CDRL(s) (if not in EDA)

f. CDRL(s)/Deliverables (if not in WAWF)

g. Contractor Safety Plan

h. Applicable status report(s)

i. Master/Delivery Schedules

j. Customer Complaint Records

k. Commercial Asset Visibility Air Force (CAV AF) Repair Item Actions Report(s)

l. Documentation of Contractor payment (if not processed in WAWF)

2.3 Plan for Corrective Action

2.3.1 Unsatisfactory Contractor performance will result in the COR issuing a negative PAR. The COR will set a suspense date and forward the PAR to the PCO for submission to the Contractor. The PCO will submit the PAR to the Contractor for corrective action. The Contractor shall explain the deficiency and identify the corrective action they shall take to resolve the deficiency and prevent recurrence. The Contractor shall sign and return a negative PAR to the PCO by the suspense date.

The COR will upload the PAR in the Surveillance and Performance Module (SPM) in PIEE IAW DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi).

2.3.2 If repetitive negative PARs or a single negative PAR identifying critical Contractor non-compliance are issued without satisfactory resolution, the COR will initiate the CAR process.

However, the MFT reserves the right to issue a CAR at any time based on the severity of the Contractor non-compliance. The COR will prepare and sign a CAR. The COR will forward the CAR to the PCO for signature. The PCO will set a suspense date and submit the CAR to the Contractor for corrective action. The Contractor shall sign and return the CAR, with a corrective action plan, to the PCO for acceptance by the MFT by the suspense date. The corrective action will be tracked and documented until the deficiency is resolved to the satisfaction of the MFT. The COR will upload the CAR in SPM IAW DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(vi). The CAR will become part of the PCO contract file. If the CAR process fails to resolve the deficiency, the PCO has the right to invoke FAR 52.246-1, FAR 52.246-2, FAR 52.246-3, FAR 52.246-4, FAR 52.246-5 and/or 52.246-11.

2.3.3 The PCO/COR shall establish a tracking system for corrective actions that includes date COR submitted CAR, date reviewed, date reviewed by PCO, date issued by PCO, contractor’s identified root cause, proposed corrective action, contractor follow-up actions, and get-well date IAW AFI 63- 138 dated 30 September 2019.

2.3.4 If the CAR process fails to resolve the unsatisfactory Contractor performance, recourse available to the MFT includes, but is not limited to, the following. The MFT has the prerogative to issue a negative Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR). The PCO has the right to invoke the Inspection of Supply/Services clause(s) identified in the contract/order.

2.4 Acceptance of Services

2.4.1 IAW DFARS 252.232-7003, the Contractor shall submit payment requests and receiving reports/acceptance documents via WAWF Services for processing by the DCMA Quality Assurance Representative (QAR), COR or a POC designated in the Task Order.

2.4.2 CDRL deliverables shall be submitted using MEARS and directly to the MFT member identified on the CDRL. The CDRL will determine submittal requirements; however, separately priced data must be accepted in WAWF in order for the Contractor to receive payment, and both separately priced and non-separately priced data must be accepted in WAWF in order for the contract line item to be closed out.

3.0 Roles and Responsibilities of Multi-Functional Team (MFT)

3.1 General Responsibilities

3.1.1 The MFT is responsible for ensuring the acquisition utilizes Performance-Based Service(s) Acquisition (PBSA) methods including establishment of performance thresholds, procedures to evaluate Contractor performance and positive/negative incentives to encourage the highest Quality of Services (QoS).

3.1.2 The MFT is responsible for conducting surveillance of Contractor performance to ensure Government requirements including QoS, cost and schedule are met. The MFT will provide the results of their surveillance to the COR for input into the PAR and to the MFT member updating the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

3.1.3 For contracts requiring higher-level quality requirements, the MFT is responsible for developing metrics in tracking the effectiveness of the contractors QMS that tie to the SS, QASP, and CPARS.

Ensure contracts requiring higher-level contract quality requirements include a SS performance objective that encompasses MFT goals related to quality directly relates to the CPARS category of “Quality”.

3.1.4 The MFT ensures contract oversight focuses on the adequacy and adherence of the contractor to their proposed QMS. The MFT shall focus on whether the COR or contractor is first in detecting defects and trends, who (COR or contractor) accomplishes more inspections, and, whether the contractor is proactively pursuing key QMS functions to ensure quality related problems or defects do not recur.

3.2 Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

3.2.1 Registers in PIEE as a COR. Self-nominates in the Joint Appointment Module (JAM) of PIEE as the designated COR for the contract. Files an Office of Government Ethics (OGE) Form 450, Confidential Financial Disclosure Report annually. Establishes and maintains an online file containing training and surveillance documentation in PIEE.

3.2.2 If a DoD acquisition is for service(s) and in excess of $3,000,000.00, verifies the Contractor has reported all SCR data for each fiscal year, including a count of contractor/subcontractor personnel performing services; all contractor labor hours, including subcontractor labor hours; the total amount invoiced; and any required Tier 1 subcontractor information for each fiscal year in the System for Award Management (SAM) [https://www.sam.gov].

1. 3.2.3 Works with the MFT in conducting and documenting surveillance on Contractor performance. Reports unethical conduct and instances of fraud, waste and/or abuse to the PCO.

Inspects and accepts/rejects deliverables during contract/TO performance and at close-out to ensure contract/TO terms and conditions are met. Monitors control and disposition of Government property. Monitors Contractor payment and verifies it is commensurate with Contractor performance. Documents Contractor performance via PARs, CARs, etc. Issues PARs, at a minimum, quarterly and negative PAR(s) or CAR(s) as required. Ensures the Contractor complies with the requirements of FAR Clause 52.222-50(c), (d), and (f) (Combating Trafficking in Persons).

3.2.4 Ensure contractor’s accepted QMS complies with contract requirements. In post award, CORs need to place special emphasis in ensuring the contractor’s QMS is being followed as written, plus is effective in bringing about the desired results – performance equal to or greater than the SS metrics, plus an inspection and corrective action program that identifies and fixes issues without having to be identified by the Government.

3.3 Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) Supervisor)

3.3.1 Upon PCO request for COR support, selects a qualified nominee. Confirms the COR nominee has no personal conflicts of interest with performing the responsibilities to be delegated by the PCO.

Verifies the COR nominee has the appropriate clearance for the contract/TO. Ensures the COR nominee files an OGE Form 450 annually. Ensures the COR takes initial, annual and any additional training required by the contracting activity. Ensures the COR completes sixteen (16) hours of refresher training every three (3) years after completion of the QAPC-Led Training.

3.3.2 Registers as Manager via PIEE.

3.3.3 Ensures the COR registers in PIEE as a user. Ensures the COR self-nominates as the COR for the contract in JAM. Upon email notification of the COR self-nomination, approves the nomination via email link. Reviews the COR Profile and COR Online File, at a minimum, annually. Considers performance of COR duties in their appraisal.

3.4 Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

3.4.1 Only individual authorized to enter into contracts for supplies and/or services by obligating the Government. Determines if a COR is required to conduct/document surveillance of Contractor performance. If the requiring activity has not initiated a COR nomination in JAM, submits a Request for COR Support memorandum to the requiring activity. Provides Contract-Specific Training to the

COR.

3.4.2 Upon notification of COR Supervisor approval of the COR self-nomination, approves the nomination in JAM. Before contract/TO award, initiates a Designation of COR memorandum in JAM.

Upon transfer/termination of the COR, initiates a Revocation (Termination) of Designation of COR memorandum in PIEE.

3.4.3 After the COR is designated, uploads a blank copy the COR File Annual Checklist in SPM under Annual COR File Inspection Checklist to guide the COR in constructing the COR Online File.

Reviews the COR reports on Contractor performance in SPM. Approves/Rejects PARS and any CAR(s). Reviews the COR Profile and COR Online File, at a minimum, annually. Documents the results of their review on the Annual COR File Inspection Checklist. Uploads the checklist in SPM under Annual COR File Inspection Checklist after the COR and COR supervisor have signed it.

Verifies the Contractor has reported all SCR data for each fiscal year, including a count of contractor/subcontractor personnel performing services; all contractor labor hours, including subcontractor labor hours; the total amount invoiced; and any required Tier 1 subcontractor information for each fiscal year in SAM. Notifies the Contractor if changes are required.

3.5 Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC)

3.5.1 Supports the MFT in the development of the contract/TO quality assurance requirements specifically ensuring the requirements are clearly stated and enforceable. Prior to contract/TO award, provides training to CORs and COR management [e.g., Functional Commander/ Functional Director (FC/FD), COR supervisor, etc.].

3.5.2 Provides functional, not technical, support for PIEE users including assistance with registration, role activation and PIEE training. Monitors records of COR and COR management training in the

PIEE.

3.6 Contractor

3.6.1 Participates as a member of the MFT upon approval of the Justification & Approval (J&A) or Sole Source Justification (SSJ) if the acquisition is sole source and upon contract/TO award if it is competitive.

3.6.2 Ensures the quality of services through an internal Quality Management System (QMS) addressing detection of quality program problems and defects, identification of root causes for quality related problems/defects, correction of root causes of quality related problems/defects, and follow-up to ensure quality related problems/defects do not recur. The QMS should identify quality standards and the type, number and frequency of quality assurance/control inspections.

3.6.3 Responsible for ensuring personnel, information, system, property, facility and, if applicable, international security requirements are met IAW the DD Form 254, Department of Defense (DoD) Contract Security Classification Specification, and all applicable Government regulations.

Complies with all applicable Government safety and health regulations including, but not limited to, Public Law 91-596 as amended by Public Law 101-552 [Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA)], and DoDD 4715.1E, Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health (ESOH). Maintains a safety program in accordance with the contract/order, the PWS, and all applicable Government regulations.

3.6.4 Maintains an inspection process acceptable to the Government and records of inspections, which shall be made available to the Government as long as the contract requires IAW the Inspection of Supply/Services clause(s) identified in the contract/TO.

3.6.5 Signs and returns a positive PAR within ten (10) business days. Signs and returns a negative PAR with corrective action identified by the COR’s suspense date. Signs and returns a CAR with a corrective action plan by the PCO’s suspense date.

3.6.6 Reports all SCR data for each fiscal year, including a count of contractor/subcontractor personnel performing services; all contractor labor hours, including subcontractor labor hours; the total amount invoiced; and required Tier 1 subcontractor information by 31 October of the following fiscal year in

SAM.

3.7 Functional Commander/Functional Director (FC/FD)

3.7.1 The FC/FD or civilian equivalent will determine if services are mission-essential and will continue in the event of a crisis IAW DFARS 237.7602(a), Continuation of Essential Contractor Services and DFARS 252.237-7023(a)(2), Continuation of Essential Contractor Services. The FC/FD or civilian equivalent will ensure mission-essential services are identified in the PWS.

Note: The FC/FD or civilian equivalent has determined these services are not mission-essential and will not continue in the event of a crisis. Reference PWS paragraph 5.1, Continuation of Mission- Essential Services during a Crisis and QASP signature page.

4.0 Management Strategy

4.1 The MFT will meet and record minutes quarterly to review contractor’s performance. The COR will issue PARs, documenting both Satisfactory and Unsatisfactory Contractor performance, at a minimum, quarterly. The COR will forward the PAR to the PCO for submission to the Contractor.

The PCO will submit the PAR to the Contractor. The Contractor shall sign and return a positive PAR to the PCO within ten (10) business days. The COR will upload the PAR in SPM. Unsatisfactory Contractor performance will result in the COR issuing a negative PAR.

4.2 If repetitive negative PARs or a single negative PAR identifying critical Contractor non-compliance are issued without satisfactory resolution, the COR will issue a CAR. However, the MFT reserves the right to issue a CAR at any time based on the severity of the Contractor non-compliance.

If the CAR process fails to resolve the unsatisfactory Contractor performance, the MFT has the prerogative to issue a negative CPAR and the PCO has the right to invoke the Inspection of Supply/Services clause(s) identified in the contract/TO.

4.3 Incentives

4.3.1 If Contractor performance meets or exceeds contractual requirements, positive incentives may include, but are not limited to, decreased surveillance, favorable CPARs and exercising options.

4.3.2 If Contractor performance does not meet contractual requirements, negative incentives may include, but are not limited to, increased surveillance, unfavorable CPARs, not exercising options and Government recourse authorized by the Inspection of Supply/Services clause(s) identified in the contract/TO.

5.0 Annual COR Online File Inspection: The COR, the COR Supervisor and the PCO will review the COR Profile and COR Online File, at a minimum, annually. The PCO will document the results of their review on the Annual COR File Inspection Checklist. After the COR and COR supervisor sign the checklist, the PCO will upload the checklist in SPM.

6.0 Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS): The total estimated value of this contract exceeds $1,000,000.00; therefore, CPARS reporting is required.

6.1 The MFT will evaluate Contractor performance. The COR will, at a minimum, review the PARs and other information contained in the COR Online File to prepare and substantiate the CPAR.

CPARS will be updated, at a minimum annually, documenting Contractor performance for the contract/TO. More frequent updates may be made, as required, to document a significant improvement or decline in the level of Contractor performance.

6.2 The Contractor shall have input into the CPAR prior to it being finalized. For each reporting period, the COR will provide the Contractor a draft CPAR with no ratings, only justifications, to examine for seven (7) calendar days. After MFT review of the Contractor’s response, the CPAR will be coordinated through management up to the Division level. Once approved, the CPAR will be sent to the Contractor via CPARS for the official sixty (60) calendar day review. The Contractor shall have the option to concur or non-concur, with comments, via CPARS.

6.3 In evaluating the quality of contractor’s performance, the following performance ratings are used in documenting past performance. The areas rated may include: QoS, Business Relations, Management, Cost Control (if applicable), and Schedule.

Performance Rating

Criteria

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefits. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no problems and contractor actions were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government benefits. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

7.0 Safety Requirements:

7.1 Mishap Notification /Investigation: IAW AFI 91-204, Safety - Safety Investigation and Hazard Reporting, the Contractor shall report mishaps involving damage to DoD property; occupational illness to DoD military or civilian personnel; injury on- or off-duty DoD military personnel; injury to on-duty DoD civilian personnel; and damage to public or private property or injury or illness to non-DoD personnel caused by USG operations. The contractor shall notify the DCMA Contract Safety Manager and the DCMA ACO within four business hours and the AFLCMC/WLS PCO and PM within eight business hours of all mishaps or incidents. The contractor shall cooperate with USG safety investigations.7.2 MFT Surveillance: The MFT will monitor Contractor compliance with the safety plan/program. The COR will review applicable Contractor reports and any mishap notifications. The COR will address safety and health issues in a negative PAR or in a CAR as applicable.

8.0 Trafficking in Persons: The MFT must inform the PCO if the contractor/subcontractor fails to comply with the requirements of FAR 52.222.50, Combating Trafficking in Persons. The PCO must convey the information to DoD Combat Trafficking in Persons (CTIP) Law Enforcement and Support / Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD) Personnel and Readiness (P&R) Defense Human Resources Activity (DHRA).

9.0 Signatures

By signing below, you are appointed to the MFT for this acquisition and accept the above responsibilities.

QAPC Date

COR Date

COR Supervisor Date

PCO Date

Contractor (Optional) Date

By signing below, you are identifying that these services are not mission-essential.

FC/FD Date

HARRIS.PAULA.O.112

5471672

Digitally signed by

HARRIS.PAULA.O.1125471672

Date: 2022.03.23 09:39:56 -05'00'

GIDDENS.JESSICA.

A.1385249272

Digitally signed by

GIDDENS.JESSICA.A.1385249272

Date: 2022.03.24 11:08:18 -04'00'

WILLIAMS.JANIC

E.M.1064833347

Digitally signed by

WILLIAMS.JANICE.M.106483334

Date: 2022.03.24 12:57:17 -04'00'

WHITE.BRITTANY

.Z.1366019002

Digitally signed by

WHITE.BRITTANY.Z.1366019002

Date: 2022.04.07 09:10:08 -04'00'