10-Technical Evaluation Score Sheet - USBE-AR25260-RFP.pdf
PDF 144 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USBE - IDEA Dispute Resolution Services
- Solicitation number
- USBE-MI26020-RFP
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This document is an evaluation score sheet for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the Utah State Board of Education (USBE) for a Professional Learning and Technical Assistance Event Planner, solicitation number USBE-AR25260-RFP. The RFP seeks a vendor to provide event planning services, with specific requirements for delivering professional learning and technical assistance events. The evaluation process is structured across three stages: Stage 1 (Mandatory Minimum Requirements), Stage 2 (Technical Criteria), and Stage 3 (Presentation), with a total of 125 possible points.
The scoring methodology is rigorous, with a 65% minimum threshold for both Stage 2 and Stage 3. The cost points will be calculated based on the lowest proposed total cost, with offerors receiving a proportional allocation of points. Notably, this solicitation requires vendors to have the ability to pay upfront costs and be reimbursed after the event, and all deliverables must comply with Sections 504 and 508 of the Rehabilitation Act and WCAG 2.2 AA standards. The evaluation criteria include demonstrated experience, financial and legal stability, implementation and marketing plans, and references, with points assigned across different categories and weighted accordingly.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MMR Number Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
Technical Criteria Number
Evaluator Score (0- 10)
Criteria Weight % of Stage 2
Points Possible Points Possible
Points Earned
Minimum Required
1 3.00 35.71% 25.00 0.00 - 2 1.50 28.57% 20.00 0.00 - 3 1.50 21.43% 15.00 0.00 - 4 1.00 14.29% 10.00 0.00 -
TOTAL 100.00% 70.00 0.00
Required Points Percentage
Min Points Required
Points Earned Percent Earned Evaluation
65.0% 45.50 0.00 0.0% Fail
Technical Criteria Number
Evaluator Score (0- 10)
Criteria Weight % of Stage 2
Points Possible Points Possible
Points Earned
Minimum Required
1 1.25 50.00% 12.50 0.00 - 2 1.25 50.00% 12.50 0.00 -
TOTAL 100.00% 25.00 0.00
Required Points Percentage
Min Points Required
Points Earned Percent Earned Evaluation
65.0% 16.25 0.00 0.0% Fail
Lowest Proposed Total Cost
Offeror's Proposed Cost
% of Total Points Possible
Earned Points Possible
Points Earned
0% 30.0 #DIV/0!
Stage Points Possible % of Total
Points Possible Points Earned
Minimum Required
Evaluation
Stage 2 70.0 56.0% 0.00 45.50 Fail Stage 3 25.0 20.0% 0.00 16.25 Fail
Final Stage 30.0 24.0% #DIV/0! N/A N/A
125.0 100.0% #DIV/0! N/A
Presentation
ST
AG
E
Presentation Criteria
Category 1 - Presented Research Plan Category 2 - Demonstrated Experience and Sample Work
Stage 3 Score Threshold
FI
N
AL
S
TA
G
E
Category 3 - Implementation and Marketing Plan
Category 1 - Demonstrated Experience
Scores will adhere to the following benchmarks:
Zero (0) points: The proposed solution does not meet requirments and expectations as described in the request for proposals Five (5) points: The proposed solution satisfactorily meets requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposals Ten (10) points: The proposed solution measurably exceeds requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposals
NOTE: The requirements and criteria listed in this RFP score sheet may be abbreviated headings. Offerors should refer to the corresponding RFP section for a complete description of criteria.
Date:
Evaluator:
SOLICITATION #USBE-AR25260-RFP
PROFESSIONAL LEARNING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE EVENT PLANNER
EVALUATION SCORE SHEET
SU
M
M
AR
Y
Evaluation Item
Technical Criteria
Cost
ST
AG
E
Category 2 - Financial and Legal Stability
Technical Criteria
Cost
The cost points assigned to each Offeror will be based on the Lowest Proposed Total Cost. The Offeror with the Lowest Proposed Total Cost will receive the maximum number of cost points possible. All other Offerors will receive a percentage of the maximum cost points based on the percentage by which the Offeror's Proposed Total Cost exceeds the Lowest Proposed Total Cost. An Offeror whose total cost is more than double (200%) the Lowest Proposed Total Cost will receive no points. The formula to compute cost points is Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Total Cost/Offeror's Proposed Total Cost).
Category 4 - References
Stage 2 Score Threshold
Firm Name:
ST
AG
E
Mandatory Minimum Requirements
Vendor must demonstrate ability to meet the scope of work described.
Vendor must have the ability to pay all costs upfront and will be reimbursed after the event.
All deliverables and work completed under the contract resulting from this RFP that may be distributed to LEAs, schools, the public, or posted on the USBE website, must be compliant with Sections 504 and 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended for the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 and WCAG 2.2 AA.
If applicable, vendor MUST protect any student-level data in a manner approved by USBE and consistent with USBE Standard Terms and Conditions for Goods and Services, which are attached to this RFP in the Buyer Attachments section.
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .