NIGP 91152: C.i.p., Project Management/Administration Surveys

NIGP 91152 C.i.p., Project Management/Administration Surveys, Item, encompasses the professional advisory services state and local governments procure to manage capital improvement program planning, environmental review, grant administration, and infrastructure asset assessment — work including project scope development, grant compliance and reporting, seismic engineering evaluation, and pavement condition indexing across road networks. The issuing bodies recently soliciting under this code span county governments, municipal wastewater and public works departments, and state transportation agencies. Galveston County, for example, is seeking grant services consultants to administer the Texas General Land Office's CDBG-Mitigation Reallocation Program, encompassing project scope development, grant management, environmental review, and acquisition services via RFP (due October 8, 2026). The City of Sandersville Waste Water Department is procuring mobile LiDAR and imagery-based pavement condition assessment with three years of GIS software hosting and support via RFQ (due August 25, 2026), covering approximately 64 centerline miles of paved streets. The County of Santa Clara is soliciting design-build proposals for seismic compliance improvements at an RMC facility (RFP, October 23, 2026), gated by prequalification. The mix reflects both routine capital planning and specialized grant or facilities engineering administration.

Recent activity concentrates in California and Georgia. Beyond these two states, Galveston County (Texas) represents additional geographic presence. The Georgia Department of Transportation cancelled a design-services RFP for the PATH Lakewood Trail Phase I project posted July 27, 2026, and DeKalb County issued an ITB for information technology infrastructure supporting the DeKalb Tennis Center reconstruction (due July 13, 2026). All five opportunities named in the source originate from either single-county issuers or state agencies without consortium or cooperative purchasing vehicles — a pattern suggesting direct engagement with county procurement offices and individual state department contracting shops rather than cooperative purchasing platforms.