20R3009vol1.pdf

Hunter AAF, Georgia

Solicitation Number

W912HN20R3009

Aircraft Maintenance Hanger Volume 1 of 5: Procurement and Contracting Requirements and Specification Division 01

PN 88410

October 2020

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SAVANNAH

CORPS OF ENGINEERS

100 WEST OGLETHORPE AVENUE

SAVANNAH, GEORGIA 31401-3640

US Army Corps of Engineers Savannah District

Construct Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 20R3009 Hunter AAF, GA

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

DI VI SI ON 01 - GENERAL REQUI REMENTS

01 30 00 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

01 32 01 PROJECT SCHEDULE

01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

01 33 29 SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING

01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS

01 45 00 QUALITY CONTROL

01 45 00.15 RESIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACTOR MODE (RMS CM)

01 45 35 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS

01 57 19 TEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS

01 78 00 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS

01 78 23 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA

01 91 00.15 TOTAL BUILDING COMMISSIONING

DI VI SI ON 02 - EXI STI NG CONDI TI ONS

02 41 00 DEMOLITION

02 82 00 ASBESTOS REMEDIATION

DI VI SI ON 03 - CONCRETE

03 30 00 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE

03 42 13 PLANT-PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS FOR BELOW GRADE

CONSTRUCTION

DI VI SI ON 04 - MASONRY

04 20 00 UNIT MASONRY

DI VI SI ON 05 - METALS

05 05 23.16 STRUCTURAL WELDING

05 12 00 STRUCTURAL STEEL

05 21 00 STEEL JOIST FRAMING

05 30 00 STEEL DECKS

05 40 00 COLD-FORMED METAL FRAMING

05 50 13 MISCELLANEOUS METAL FABRICATIONS

05 51 00 METAL STAIRS

05 51 33 METAL LADDERS

05 52 00 METAL RAILINGS

DI VI SI ON 06 - WOOD, PLASTI CS, AND COMPOSI TES

06 10 00 ROUGH CARPENTRY

06 20 00 FINISH CARPENTRY

06 41 16 PLASTIC-LAMINATE-CLAD ARCHITECTURAL CABINETS

06 61 16 SOLID SURFACING FABRICATIONS

DI VI SI ON 07 - THERMAL AND MOI STURE PROTECTI ON

07 05 23 PRESSURE TESTING AN AIR BARRIER SYSTEM FOR AIR TIGHTNESS

07 14 00 FLUID-APPLIED WATERPROOFING

07 21 13 BOARD AND BLOCK INSULATION

07 21 16 MINERAL FIBER BLANKET INSULATION

07 22 00 ROOF AND DECK INSULATION

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1

07 27 10 BUILDING AIR BARRIER SYSTEM

07 27 19.01 SELF-ADHERING AIR BARRIERS

07 27 26 FLUID-APPLIED MEMBRANE AIR BARRIERS

07 41 13 METAL ROOF PANELS

07 42 13 METAL WALL PANELS

07 60 00 FLASHING AND SHEET METAL

07 61 14 STEEL STANDING SEAM ROOFING

07 81 00 SPRAY-APPLIED FIREPROOFING

07 84 00 FIRESTOPPING

07 92 00 JOINT SEALANTS

DI VI SI ON 08 - OPENI NGS

08 11 13 STEEL DOORS AND FRAMES

08 14 00 WOOD DOORS

08 31 00 ACCESS DOORS AND PANELS

08 33 13 COILING COUNTER DOORS

08 33 23 OVERHEAD COILING DOORS

08 34 16.10 STEEL SLIDING HANGAR DOORS

08 34 59 VAULT DOORS AND DAY GATES

08 34 73 SOUND CONTROL DOOR ASSEMBLIES

08 51 13 ALUMINUM WINDOWS

08 71 00 DOOR HARDWARE

08 81 00 GLAZING

08 91 00 METAL WALL LOUVERS

DI VI SI ON 09 - FI NI SHES

09 06 00 SCHEDULES FOR FINISHES

09 22 00 SUPPORTS FOR PLASTER AND GYPSUM BOARD

09 29 00 GYPSUM BOARD

09 30 10 CERAMIC, QUARRY, AND GLASS TILING

09 51 00 ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS

09 62 38 STATIC-CONTROL FLOORING

09 65 00 RESILIENT FLOORING

09 67 23.13 STANDARD RESINOUS FLOORING

09 67 23.15 FUEL RESISTIVE RESINOUS FLOORING, 3-COAT SYSTEM

09 67 23.16 FUEL RESISTIVE RESINOUS FLOORING, 5-COAT SYSTEM

09 68 00 CARPETING

09 90 00 PAINTS AND COATINGS

09 97 13.27 EXTERIOR COATING OF STEEL STRUCTURES

DI VI SI ON 10 - SPECI ALTI ES

10 14 00.20 INTERIOR SIGNAGE

10 14 53 TRAFFIC SIGNAGE

10 21 13 TOILET COMPARTMENTS

10 22 13 WIRE MESH PARTITIONS

10 26 00 WALL AND DOOR PROTECTION

10 28 13 TOILET ACCESSORIES

10 44 43 FIRE EXTINGUISHER ACCESSORIES

10 51 13 METAL LOCKERS

DI VI SI ON 11 - EQUI PMENT

11 11 33.51 AIRCRAFT WASH RACK

DI VI SI ON 12 - FURNI SHI NGS

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2

12 24 13 ROLLER WINDOW SHADES

12 48 13 ENTRANCE FLOOR MATS AND FRAMES

12 93 00 SITE FURNISHINGS

DI VI SI ON 13 - SPECI AL CONSTRUCTI ON

13 12 80 RELOCATABLE HAZARDOUS MATERIAL AND HAZARDOUS WASTE

STORAGE BUILDINGS

13 34 19 METAL BUILDING SYSTEMS

13 48 00 SEISMIC BRACING FOR MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT

DI VI SI ON 14 - CONVEYI NG EQUI PMENT

14 24 23 HYDRAULIC PASSENGER ELEVATORS

DI VI SI ON 21 - FI RE SUPPRESSI ON

21 13 13 WET PIPE SPRINKLER SYSTEM, FIRE PROTECTION

21 13 25 HIGH-EXPANSION FOAM SYSTEM, FIRE PROTECTION

21 30 05.16 FIRE PUMPS AND ENCLOSURES

DI VI SI ON 22 - PLUMBI NG

22 00 00 PLUMBING, GENERAL PURPOSE

DI VI SI ON 23 - HEATI NG, VENTI LATI NG, AND AI R CONDI TI ONI NG ( HVAC)

23 00 00 AIR SUPPLY, DISTRIBUTION, VENTILATION, AND EXHAUST SYSTEMS

23 05 15 COMMON PIPING FOR HVAC

23 05 48.19 SEISMIC BRACING FOR HVAC

23 05 93 TESTING, ADJUSTING, AND BALANCING FOR HVAC

23 07 00 THERMAL INSULATION FOR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS

23 09 00 INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL FOR HVAC

23 09 13 INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL DEVICES FOR HVAC

23 09 23.02 BACNET DIRECT DIGITAL CONTROL FOR HVAC AND OTHER BUILDING

CONTROL SYSTEMS

23 11 25 FACILITY GAS PIPING

23 23 00 REFRIGERANT PIPING

23 52 00 HEATING BOILERS

23 64 10 WATER CHILLERS, VAPOR COMPRESSION TYPE

23 64 26 CHILLED, CHILLED-HOT, AND CONDENSER WATER PIPING SYSTEMS

23 81 00 DECENTRALIZED UNITARY HVAC EQUIPMENT

23 82 00 TERMINAL HEATING UNITS

DI VI SI ON 25 - I NTEGRATED AUTOMATI ON

25 05 11.21 CYBERSECURITY FOR FOAM APPLICATION SYSTEMS

25 05 11.23 CYBERSECURITY FOR HVAC SYSTEMS

25 05 11.26 CYBERSECURITY FOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS

25 05 11.28 CYBERSECURITY FOR FIRE ALARM/MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEMS

25 05 11.30 CYBERSECURITY FOR ELEVATOR CONTROL SYSTEM

DI VI SI ON 26 - ELECTRI CAL

26 05 48 SEISMIC PROTECTION FOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

26 08 00 APPARATUS INSPECTION AND TESTING

26 20 00 INTERIOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

26 24 13 SWITCHBOARDS

26 28 01 COORDINATED POWER SYSTEM PROTECTION

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3

26 29 23 VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE SYSTEMS UNDER 600 VOLTS

26 35 43 400-HERTZ (HZ) SOLID STATE FREQUENCY CONVERTER

26 36 01 NON-AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH (NATS)

26 37 00 SANITARY SEWER PUMP STATION EMERGENCY STAND-BY POWER

SYSTEM

26 41 00 LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM

26 42 14 CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM (SACRIFICIAL ANODE)

26 42 15 CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM (STEEL WATER TANKS)

26 51 00 LIGHTING

DI VI SI ON 27 - COMMUNI CATI ONS

27 05 14 CABLE TELEVISION PREMISES DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

27 05 28.36 CABLE TRAYS FOR COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS

27 05 29 PROTECTIVE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (PDS) FOR SIPRNET

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

27 10 00 BUILDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CABLING SYSTEM

27 51 16 PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM

27 51 23.10 INTERCOMMUNICATION SYSTEM

DI VI SI ON 28 - ELECTRONI C SAFETY AND SECURI TY

28 31 76 INTERIOR FIRE ALARM AND MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEMS

DI VI SI ON 31 - EARTHWORK

31 00 00 EARTHWORK

31 05 19 GEOTEXTILE

31 05 22 GEOTEXTILES USED AS FILTERS

31 11 00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING

31 31 16.13 CHEMICAL TERMITE CONTROL

DI VI SI ON 32 - EXTERI OR I MPROVEMENTS

32 01 11.51 PAINT REMOVAL FROM AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS

32 01 16.71 COLD MILLING ASPHALT PAVING

32 01 19.61 RESEALING OF JOINTS IN RIGID PAVEMENT

32 05 33 LANDSCAPE ESTABLISHMENT

32 11 23 AGGREGATE BASE COURSES

32 11 23.23 BASE COURSE DRAINAGE LAYERS

32 12 13 BITUMINOUS TACK AND PRIME COATS

32 12 16 HOT-MIX ASPHALT (HMA) FOR ROADS

32 13 13.06 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR ROADS AND SITE

FACILITIES

32 13 14.13 CONCRETE PAVING FOR AIRFIELDS AND OTHER HEAVY DUTY

PAVEMENTS

32 13 73 COMPRESSION JOINT SEALS FOR CONCRETE PAVEMENTS

32 16 19 CONCRETE CURBS, GUTTERS AND SIDEWALKS

32 17 23 PAVEMENT MARKINGS

32 31 13 CHAIN LINK FENCES AND GATES

32 31 13.53 HIGH-SECURITY CHAIN LINK FENCES AND GATES

32 92 19 SEEDING

32 92 23 SODDING

32 93 00 EXTERIOR PLANTS

DI VI SI ON 33 - UTI LI TI ES

33 11 00 WATER UTILITY DISTRIBUTION PIPING

33 16 15 WATER STORAGE STEEL TANKS

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 4

33 16 23 GROUND-LEVEL STEEL WATER STORAGE TANKS

33 30 00 SANITARY SEWERAGE

33 31 23 SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN PIPING

33 32 13.13 PACKAGED SEWAGE LIFT STATIONS, WET WELL TYPE

33 40 00 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITIES

33 46 16 SUBDRAINAGE PIPING

33 51 15 NATURAL-GAS DISTRIBUTION PIPELINES

33 61 13.13 PREFABRICATED UNDERGROUND HYDRONIC ENERGY DISTRIBUTION

33 71 02 UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION

33 82 00 TELECOMMUNICATIONS OUTSIDE PLANT (OSP)

DI VI SI ON 41 - MATERI AL PROCESSI NG AND HANDLI NG EQUI PMENT

41 22 13.13 BRIDGE CRANES

DI VI SI ON 46 - WATER AND WASTEWATER EQUI PMENT

46 25 14 OIL-WATER SEPARATORS

-- End of Project Table of Contents --

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 5

PN 88410 Construct Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, Hunter Army Airf ield, Savannah, GA

A. This acquisition w ill be aw arded utilizing a Low est Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Source Selection Process in accordance w ith

FAR 15.101-2.

B. This solicitation is being solicited on an unrestricted basis as full and open competition, but contains a HUBZone Price Evaluation Preference.

C. The North American Industry Classif ication System (NAICS) code is 236220.

D. Per DFARS 236.204 Disclosure of Magnitude: the Magnitude of this project is betw een $25,000,000 and $100,000,000.

E. The proposal of the successful offeror shall be incorporated by reference into the aw arded contract.

***Offerors should include the offeror's cage code in block 14 of the 1442 of the proposal submission.*** An amendment may be issued to revise the Erosion Control Draw ings if required upon approval and receipt of the Land Disturbance Permit.

HECTOR L SIERRA-ALMEDINA 912-652-5105

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

29-Oct-2020

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

Hunter Army Aircraft Maintenance Hangar

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________720 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________ copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________15 Dec 2020 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

USACE - SAVANNAH DISTRICT

100 W. OGLETHORPE AVE

SAVANNAH GA 31401

W912HN

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

01:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

88410

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

W912HN20R3009 64

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Section SF 30 - Block 14 Continuation Page (SF 30)

AMENDMENT 0001

A. CONTRACT CHANGES: FAR Clause 52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995) has been clarified.

B. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES: The revised Section listed below (revised by Amendment No.

0001) is hereby added to and made a part of the solicitation. Revised or added information is underlined and deleted information is struck out. Revisions can be found in the appropriate volume of specifications by searching for an asterisk and amendment number (i.e., *1).

Revised Section 26 35 43

C. CONTRACT DRAWINGS – File No. 211-10-02: There are no drawing changes with this amendment.

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Job Base:FFP

Construct Maintenance Hangar, Complete FOB: Destination

NET AMT

0002 1 Job

Construct POL Storage Building, Complete

0003 1 Job

Construct Hazardous Waste Storage Building

0004 1 Job

Construct GSE Shed, Complete

0005 1 Job

Construct Mobile Shop Covered Storage Area

0006 1 Job

Construct Pavements (Aprons, waskrack, storage yards, vehicle parking, walks, Drives, etc)

0007 1 Job

Construct Water Storage Tank, Complete

0008 1 Job

Demolition, Site Preparation and Development Work Beyond the 5-foot Line, Complete

0009 1 Job Option 1FFP

All work East of S. Lightning Road (Landside Parking/Road), Complete

0010 1 Job Option 2FFP

Water Tower and 12” Waterline and Associated (The main line is a 16" line, but there are also smaller 12" and 6" lines) waterlines, Complete

CLIN TOTALS

TOTAL BASE PROPOSAL

(CLINS 0001-0008)

TOTAL OPTIONS 1 & 2 PROPOSAL

(CLINS 0009-0010)

TOTAL BASE PLUS OPTIONS 1 & 2 PROPOSAL

(CLINS 0001-0010)

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

NOTICE TO PROPOSERS PART 2

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

1. OVERVIEW.

1.1 This Request for Proposal (RFP) solicits for the Aircraft Maintenance Hangar at Hunter Army Airfield, GA. This will be a Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) contract.

2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 Who May Submit a Proposal. The requirement will be advertised under full and open competition; any legally organized firm with an active registration in www.sam.gov may submit a proposal. Offerors submitting as a joint venture must provide the agreement forming the joint venture.

2.2 Information submitted about any company other than the Offeror, whether a predecessor company, affiliated company, subsidiary (including wholly owned subsidiaries), or subcontractors WILL NOT be evaluated for any factor. Information about firms that are part of a joint venture will be considered when the joint venture is the Offeror.

2.3 Offerors shall submit their proposal to the address shown under Proposal and Bid Bond Submission Instructions in Section 00 21 00.

3. GENERAL PROPOSAL FORMAT:

3.1 Title Page. Include the title of the solicitation, solicitation number, Offeror name, and date of the submittal.

3.2 Table of Contents. Each volume of the proposal shall contain a detailed table of contents.

Any materials submitted but not required by this solicitation (such as company brochures) shall be relegated to appendices.

3.3 Electronic Submissions.

3.3.1 Electronic material shall be on 8 ½ x 11 inch paper size, using no smaller than a 10 pitch or 10 font. Page limitations, where specified in the RFP, shall be considered a maximum.

Pages in excess of any specified limitation shall not be evaluated.

3.3.2 Offerors SHALL submit an electronic version (PDF Format) of the original Volume I and Volume II. Offerors SHALL submit only two files in PDF format (i.e. Volume I and Volume II). These two files should be named in a specific format: Solicitation Number, Offeror’s Company name and the volume (i.e. W912HN19R3009_USACE_Volume_I.pdf). Given the limited time and resources of the evaluation board, failure to provide proposal in the correct format may hinder the board's ability to evaluate the Offeror's proposal.

3.4 Tabs. Proposal shall be organized and tabbed as follows:

VOLUME I Price/Representations/Certifications

TAB A – Standard Form 1442, completed and signed by authorized individual(s) of the Offeror.

Offers submitted in the name of a Joint Venture must be signed in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the joint venture agreement as evidenced in the proposal.

TAB B – Section 00 10 00 – Solicitation, Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Schedule

TAB C - Section 00 45 00– Representations and Certifications – Offerors will provide a full copy of their electronic Representations and Certifications completed electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) from their active SAM registration in lieu of the Section 00 45 00 Representations and Certifications that are included in the RFP. Offerors are to also submit a statement certifying that their Representations and Certifications are compliant with FAR 52.204-7, 52.204-8 and DFARS 252.204-7007 ALT A. Offeror’s Representation and Certifications are incorporated by reference into the proposal per FAR 52.204-19. In addition, if an offeror’s Representation and Certifications are amended from the electronic record at https://www.sam.gov, the offeror must submit a completed DFAR 252.204-7007 ALT A in full text identifying the changes to the electronic Representations and Certifications that are applicable to this solicitation only within Tab C.

TAB D – Proposal Data Sheet – See Attachment 1 provided at the end of this section.

Offerors should ensure telephone number; fax number, e-mail address and DUNS number are all included. The DUNS number provided will be used to access Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) data. Offerors should also provide any other assigned number that identifies them in the PPIRS database. If a separate DUNS has been created for a joint venture, it must be submitted. The Offeror should also submit its Tax ID number on the proposal data sheet.

TAB E – Bid Bond – See Clause 52.228-1 and any other notes for required bond information.

The Offeror is required to submit a bid bond. Photocopied or electronically scanned bid bonds are not acceptable and may lead to the rejection of the proposal as non-responsive. Offerors shall use the most recent form SF24 (https://www.gsa.gov/forms-library/bid-bond).

TAB F – Financial Information –Provide either the last three years financial statements, Annual Reports, o r Dun and Bradstreet ratings. Provide a list of all current contracts held, total dollar value, award date, anticipated completion, performance and payment bond amount. The Offeror shall also provide a Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR Clause 52.219-9 (Basic Clause as indicated in the RFP), Small Business Subcontracting Plan.

TAB G – Joint Venture Agreement, if applicable. See paragraph 2.1

VOLUME II Technical Submittal

TAB H – Past Performance Questionnaires/CPARS Summary Sheet (Attachment 2) and Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Attachment 3) or Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (CPARS) evaluations.

4. FACTOR 1 – CORPORATE RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

4.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

4.1.1 Submit the Past Performance Questionnaire/CPARS Summary Sheet (Attachment 2), and the Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Attachment 3) or CPARS evaluations to demonstrate experience in performing projects meeting the requirements described in paragraph

4.1.3. If the Offeror is a joint venture, the projects did not have to have been performed by the joint venture submitting the offer. These projects could have been performed by either company in the joint venture. Offerors are required to submit projects wherein the Offeror, or proposed joint venture or joint venture member, was the prime contractor and played a significant role and to clearly define those roles. If any Offeror has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division or unit submitting the offer. Ensure that the PPQs/CPARS and continuation sheet, if used, submitted for this Factor clearly describe the relevant characteristics of the project.

Offerors may submit PPQs or CPARS evaluations submitted on other procurements provided they are on the NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire Form. Offerors shall not merely incorporate by reference PPQs previously submitted for other procurements. Offerors may attach one additional single-sided page per PPQ or CPARS to further describe how the project meets the RFP requirements.

4.1.2 Offerors shall submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) projects using a PPQ or a CPARS evaluation. If an Offeror submits more than five (5) total project examples, only the first five (5) will be evaluated.

4.1.3 Recent, relevant projects.

4.1.3.1 To be considered recent, projects must have been successfully completed, or fully designed and at least 50% construction progress completed within six (6) years preceding the date the solicitation is issued.

4.1.3.2 Projects must be a minimum contract value of $20 million. The Government will not consider multiple projects such as individual task order, combined to meet the minimum contract value.

4.1.3.3 To be considered relevant to the work in this solicitation, projects must consist of vertical construction projects similar to the following:

Construction of new vertical facilities similar to an aircraft maintenance hangar, maintenance/operational facilities, administrative/office buildings, parts and tools storage, company operations facilities, Petroleum, Oil Lubricant (POL) storage, enclosed storage building, hangar apron, aircraft washing apron, water supply building, cybersecurity and fire protection systems.

4.1.3.4. Of the recent and relevant projects submitted, at least one (1) project shall be an aircraft maintenance hangar.

4.1.3.5. Of the recent and relevant projects submitted, at least one (1) project that was built on a Department of Defense property/installation or other Federal Government location that required all of the following: controlled access to the property or the installation; background checks or clearances by the Government of the contractor and subcontractor personnel; and controlled access to a secured construction site.

4.1.4 The project description on the PPQ or CPARS evaluation shall clearly describe the projects. The Government will not assume any project characteristics that are not specifically identified and described. The Offeror may attach a continuation sheet to the PPQ/CPAR if needed consisting of one (1) page to describe how the project contained the elements described above and meets the requirements of this factor. The submission must contain sufficient information for the government to determine whether the project meets the requirements of

4.1.3 and its subparagraphs.

4.1.5 The PPQ or CPARS evaluation must provide a Point of Contact for the Client. If the Government is unable to verify the information provided on the PPQ or CPARS evaluation with the client Point of Contact, or by other sources available (e.g. CPARS), the Government reserves the right to disregard that project when evaluating the Offeror’s experience.

4.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

4.2.1 The Offeror’s submission will be evaluated to determine whether the Offeror has experience performing recent, relevant projects.

A minimum of three (3) projects must be submitted. Each project must meet the requirements of paragraph 4.1.3. At least one project must contain work described in paragraph

4.1.3.4 and at least one project must contain work described in paragraph 4.1.3.5.

4.2.2 Rating Methodology for Factor 1. Factor 1 will be rated using the following adjectival descriptions:

ACCEPTABLE - Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

UNACCEPTABLE – Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

5. FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

5.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

5.1.1 The Offeror shall demonstrate a record of performance on each project submitted for Factor 1. The information submitted through CPARS evaluation Summary Sheet (Attachment 2), and the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 3) or a CPAR for Factor 1 will be evaluated for this factor. The PPQ is provided for the Offeror to submit to the client (Point of Contact) for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal. Offeror must ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client Point of Contact.

Completed PPQs/CPARs must be submitted with your proposal by the specified closing date and time. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. While it is important to submit a PPQ signed by the client, if the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a point of contact for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete blocks 1 – 5 of the PPQ which will contain contract and client information and submit it with the proposal. The Government will call and confirm information provided by the Offeror on the PPQs with the points of contact, to the extent necessary to verify the information in the PPQ or to obtain additional information. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals if the point of contact is not available. If the Government is unable to verify the information in the PPQ, it may be disregarded. Offerors are cautioned that the PPQ must contain sufficient information for the government to determine whether the project contains the elements of work similar to this requirement as described in Factor 1.

Project Information submitted in a format other than or in lieu of the PPQ or CPARS will not be considered. The Government may utilize previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. The Government will consider any available CCASS or CPARS information on the relevant projects submitted. In addition, the Government may consider available past performance information on projects not submitted by Offerors in response to this solicitation.

5.1.2 Offerors may provide information on problems encountered on the identified contracts and the Offeror’s corrective actions. This information, if necessary, shall be limited to the additional page referenced in paragraph 4.1.4.

5.1.3 Using PPQs/CPARs as described above, Offerors shall demonstrate the quality of performance information on projects determined by the government to be recent and relevant from Factor 1.

5.1.4 While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the offeror must provide detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information for evaluation by the Government.

5.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

5.2.1 Past Performance Evaluation. The past performance evaluation results in an assessment of the probability that the Offeror will meet the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation considers each Offeror’s demonstrated record of performance on recent and relevant projects that involve a similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities as this solicitation requires. The projects submitted for Factor 1 will be evaluated to assess the Government’s confidence in the ability of the Offeror to meet the solicitation requirements.

5.2.2 Performance Evaluation. The Government will evaluate the quality of the Offeror’s past performance using the sources available to it including but not limited to the projects identified by the Offeror and submitted on the PPQs and any additional information about those projects received from references and CPARS evaluations. The Government will consider any available CCASS or CPARS information on the relevant projects submitted by the Offeror under this factor. The Government reserves the right to determine an Offeror’s past performance to be Unacceptable if negative past performance information on relevant projects performed by the Offeror but not submitted in response to this solicitation is discovered.

5.2.3 The Government will consider past performance of the offeror and the past performance information submitted on members of a joint venture.

5.2.4 Rating Methodology for Factor 2. The Government will consider the quality of recent and relevant past performance information to assign a past performance evaluation rating.

To be rated “Acceptable” in this factor, Offerors must receive ratings of Satisfactory or better in each Evaluation Methodology. Offerors must receive ratings of Satisfactory or better in each Section of all recent, relevant PPQs submitted by the Offeror and on recent, relevant CPARS evaluations reviewed by the government. A “Section” in a PPQ is the individual element within each Section. For example Quality Section is not rated however each question/statement such as a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts; b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance; c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance; d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance) is rated and will be considered individually in the evaluation of this factor. “Sections” in a CPARS evaluation are Quality, Schedule, Cost Control (if applicable), Management, Utilization of Small Business, Regulatory Compliance, and Other Areas such as but not limited to Safety. The elements within each Section of a CPARS evaluation are not considered in determining whether an offeror is Acceptable for this factor. If a project is submitted for which an evaluation was performed under the older CCASS system, only the Overall Rating will be considered, however the associated PPQ will still consider individual elements within each section. This factor will be rated using the following adjectival descriptions:

Past Performance Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

5.2.5 If no recent and relevant performance record is available or information is so sparse that no meaningful rating can be reasonably assigned, this factor will be assigned a rating of “Unknown” (FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “Acceptable”.

6.0 PRICE FACTOR

6.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

6.1.1 Offerors shall submit the completed CLIN Schedule in Section 00 10 00 of the RFP containing prices for each CLIN.

6.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

6.2.1 The offeror's price proposal will be evaluated for completeness, price reasonableness, and unbalanced pricing. In the evaluation, the Government may use data, external to the offeror's proposal, such as, but not limited to, field pricing reports, industry information, Government estimates, same or similar DoD contracts, and commercial data. For all Contract Line Item Numbers (CLIN), the evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise such options.

6.2.2 Completeness – To be complete, the Offeror must provide all data that is requested and necessary to evaluate the prices, including completing all CLINs identified on the CLIN schedule Section 00 10 00. The Government will assess the extent to which the proposed prices comply with the content and format requirements set forth in this solicitation.

6.2.3 Reasonableness: In conducting the reasonableness analysis, the Government will use one or more analysis techniques described in, but not limited to, FAR 15.404-1.

6.2.4 Unbalanced Pricing: The offeror’s proposal will be assessed for the presence of unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items (CLINs) is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques. An offer may be rejected if the contracting officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

6.2.5 Insufficient details to support the determination of reasonableness and non-presence of unbalanced pricing, initially or subsequently, may be a consideration for excluding the offeror’s proposal from the competitive range and further consideration for award.

7. OVERALL PROPOSAL EVALUATION

7.1 The evaluation will be based on the content of the proposal, and any information obtained from other sources, e.g. past performance information. The Source Selection Evaluation Board will not consider any documents incorporated by reference, except as expressly allowed by this solicitation.

7.2 Each member of the SSEB will independently consider all information provided in the proposal. Once these individual analyses are completed, the SSEB will assign a consensus rating for each evaluation factor.

7.3 The Government will evaluate the proposals beginning with the lowest price to the highest price until it reaches the first three responsive and responsible Offerors who achieve Acceptable ratings in both factors. The remainder of the proposals may not be evaluated. If less than three proposals are received, then all proposals will be evaluated.

8. EXCEPTIONS. Exceptions to the contractual terms and conditions of the solicitation (e.g., standard company terms and conditions) may result in a determination to reject a proposal.

9. RESTRICTIONS. Failure to submit all the data in the format indicated in this section may be cause for determining a proposal incomplete and, therefore, not considered for evaluation, and for subsequent award.

10. BASIS FOR AWARD

10.1 Proposals must meet the criteria stated in the RFP in order to be eligible for award, to include responsiveness, and technical acceptability. A responsibility determination will be made in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 9.1.

10.2 In order to determine which proposal(s) represent the best value, proposals will be evaluated against all source selection criteria in this RFP.

10.3 Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of a proposal meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. The Government will make award to the lowest priced Offeror with an “acceptable” rating in all non-price factors which is deemed responsive and whose price has been determined fair and reasonable.

10.4 The Government reserves the right to reject any and all offers.

10.5 Offerors are reminded to include their best technical and price terms in their initial proposal.

ATTACHMENT 1

PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

PROJECT TITLE: Aircraft Maintenance Hangar

PROJECT LOCATION: Hunter Army Airfield, GA

1. Name of Firm:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

E-mail:

DUNS # (used for accessing CPARS, PPIRS) Cage Code:

TAX ID number:

2. AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS. FAR 52.215-11

The Offeror represents that the following persons are authorized to negotiate on its behalf with the Government in connection with this Request for Proposals (RFP).

Name of Person Authorized to Negotiate: ________________________________________

Negotiator’s Address: ________________________________________________________

Negotiator’s Telephone: __________________________________

Negotiator’s E-mail:______________________________________

ATTACHMENT 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE/CPAR SUMMARY SHEET

Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, Hunter Army Airfield, GA

The Offeror’s proposal shall include the Past Performance Questionnaire Summary Sheet to provide a summary of the PPQs and/or CPARS evaluations included in this proposal. The summary sheet shall include information for all columns.

No.

Project Name

Contractor

Contract #

Construction % Complete @ Time of Solicitation

Scheduled

Completion Date

ATTACHMENT 3

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: ___ Prime Contractor ___Sub Contractor __Joint Venture ___ Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: ___ Firm Fixed Price ___Cost Reimbursement ___ Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work: ___High ___ Med ___ Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Organization:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE

OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH

THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE

SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY

ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE.

PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE

GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL

INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner.

A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.

Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E

VG

S

M

U

N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes

No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

NOTICE TO PROPOSERS

1. Pre-Award Information: This Acquisition will be solicited using FAR part 15, Contracting by Negotiation procedures as Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) unrestricted. This Acquisition will be full and open competition. The resultant contract will be a single, firm fixed price contract for Project Number: 88410, Aircraft Maintenance Hangar at Hunter Army Airfield, Savannah, GA.

2. Basis For Award: Contract shall be awarded to the responsive and responsible, lowest priced technically acceptable prospective contractor. PRIOR TO AWARD, IN ORDER TO BE DETERMINED RESPONSIVE AND RESPONSIBLE, A PROSPECTIVE Proposer MUST FURNISH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WITHIN THE ELECTRONICALLY Submitted proposal:

a. Standard Form 1442, completed and signed by an authorized person.

b. Unit and Total Pricing for all items in the proposal schedule. Proposers are required to submit a proposal guarantee for this project in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee. An electronic copy of the bid guarantee must be submitted with the electronic proposal submission. Also, the original bid guarantee shall be mailed to:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Savannah District CECT-SAS-E (Hector Sierra-Almedina) 100 W. Oglethorpe Ave.

Savannah, GA 31401

c. Current Financial Statement (e.g. the last three years financial statement, Annual Reports, Dun and Bradstreet ratings and/or number, etc.) Provide a list of all current contracts held, total dollar value, award date, anticipated completion, performance and payment bond amount. The financial statement information will be protected from disclosure by the Contracting Officer.

Please note that offerors shall submit a subcontracting plan pursuant to 52.219-9 upon request by the Contracting Officer after proposal due date, but before award. Does not apply to small business offerors.

3. Submission of Proposals:

Offeror’s proposals shall be submitted electronically, as described below. The Offeror’s proposal shall not contain classified data. The use of hyperlinks in proposals is prohibited. The offeror’s proposal is due in accordance with block 13 of the SF1442.

Note: The only authorized transmission method for proposals in response to this solicitation is electronically via SAFE online submission. NO OTHER TRANSMISSION METHODS (EMAIL, FACSIMILE, REGULAR MAIL, HAND CARRIED, ETC.) WILL BE ACCEPTED other than for original bid bond.

The Offeror’s proposal must be received by the Government by the date/time specified in the solicitation. Offerors shall submit their proposal using the following link:

https://safe.apps.mil/

Please send proposals using the link above to Contract Specialist Hector Sierra-Almedina at hector.l.sierra-almedina@usace.army.mil AND to Contracting Officer Bruce Helms at Bruce.A.Helms@usace.army.mil.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING ELECTRONIC PROPOSALS:

All proposals shall be submitted electronically through the SAFE site. You are limited to five (5) maximum files per upload (total size cannot exceed 2GB). If you have a large number of files, recommend that you combine or ZIP your files before uploading to the SAFE site.