01 33 16.00 10.pdf

Fort Drum Wellfield Expansion project DRUMWELLFIELDEXP Amendment 004 August 03, 2026

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10

DESIGN DATA (DESIGN AFTER AWARD)

05/16

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 SUMMARY

After award, develop the accepted proposal into the completed design, as described herein. Use a collaborative, integrated design process for all stages of project delivery with comprehensive performance goals for site development, energy, water, material selection, indoor environmental quality, and waste diversion. Ensure incorporation of these goals in project delivery. Consider all stages of the building lifecycle, including deconstruction, rehabilitation, re-purposing, or demolition.

1.2 REFERENCES

The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to within the text by the basic designation only.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO)

ISO 19005-3 (2012) Document Management -- Electronic Document File Format for Long-Term Preservation -- Part 3: Use of ISO 32000-1 with Support for Embedded Files (PDF/A-3)

ISO 19115-1 (2014) Geographic Information -- Metadata -- Part 1: Fundamentals

ISO 32000-1 (2008) Document Management -- Portable Document Format -- Part 1: PDF 1.7

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BUILDING SCIENCES (NIBS)

NBIMS-US (V3) National BIM Standard - United States

NCS (V6) United States National CAD Standard

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE)

EM 1110-1-2909 (2012) Engineering and Design -- Geospatial Data and Systems

ERDC/ITL TR-19-6 (2019) A/E/C Graphics Standard, Release 2.1

ERDC/ITL TR-19-7 (2019) A/E/C CAD Standard - Release 6.1

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD)

UFC 1-200-02 (2020; Change 3, 2025 ) High Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements

UFC 1-300-02 (2014; with Change 3, 2021) Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS)

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 1

Format Standard

UFC 3-101-01 (2020; with Change 4, 2024) Architecture

UFC 4-010-01 (2018; with Change 3, 2024) DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings

1.3 DEFINITIONS

1.3.1 Designer of Record (DOR)

Professional Registered members of the Contractor’s Design-Build team that check, approve, sign, date, and certify, prior to submitting the deliverables to the Government, that the D-B design submittals comply with the contract requirements.

The DOR's stamp, sign, and date each design drawing and other design deliverables under their responsible discipline at each design submittal stage. The DOR(s) are responsible for maintaining the integrity of the design and for compliance with the contract requirements through construction and documentation of the as-built condition by coordination, review and approval of extensions of design, material, equipment and other construction submittals, review and approval or disapproval of requested deviations to the accepted design or to the contract, coordination with the Government of the above activities, and by performing other typical professional design responsibilities.

1.3.2 Government Furnished Material (GFM)

Government material that may be incorporated into, or attached to, an end item to be delivered under a contract or which may be consumed in the performance of a contract. It includes, but is not limited to, raw and processed material, parts, components, assemblies, and small tools and supplies.

1.3.3 Advanced Modeling

A subset of geospatial technologies as defined in EM 1110-1-2909 to include BIM, CIM, GIS, and CAD. Advanced Modeling is comprised of models and drawings that form a digital representation of the project, or part thereof, that are comprised of model elements with facility data.

1.3.4 Model Element

A self-contained graphical element with a unique identification that is used to populate a model, and whose behavior and properties are defined by facility/site data and software processes. Model elements can represent a physical entity, such as a pump, a concrete wall, or a utility vault and range from the simple to the complex and can be custom modified.

1.3.5 USACE Minimum Modeling Matrix (M3)

The USACE Minimum Modeling Matrix (M3) describes the minimum modeling and data requirements by defining the level of development (LOD) and element grade.

1.3.6 Facility Data

Non-graphical data attached to surface and subsurface components for both

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 2 building and site model elements that describe various facility characteristics such as parametric values that drive physical sizes, material definitions (e.g. wood, metal), manufacturer data, industry standards (e.g. AISC steel properties), location, and project identification numbers. Facility data can also define supplementary physical entities that are not shown graphically in the model, such as the system of a duct, hardware on a door, content of conduit, site surface, alignment, levee, channel or transformer properties.

1.3.7 Industry Foundation Class (IFC)

IFC are a standard and file format used for the exchange of model elements and data; see https://www.buildingsmart.org/standards/bsi-standards/industry-foundation-c lasses/ . In the context of this section, IFC does not mean "Issued For Construction."

1.3.8 Model Uses

A Model Use is a method or strategy of applying modeling during a facility's life cycle to achieve one or more specific objectives.

Reference NBIMS-US for the definitive list of Model Uses and definitions.

1.3.9 USACE BIM/CIM Platform Configuration Standards - Templates, Workspaces, Catalogs, and Environments

1.3.9.1 Bentley AECOsim and InRoads Workspace

The Workspace is contained within the A/E/C Work Structure. It is comprised of a collection of content libraries and supporting files that define and embody a BIM standard. Libraries include content such as wall types, standard steel shapes, furniture, HVAC fittings, and sprinkler heads. The Workspace also contains sheet libraries such as print/plot configurations, font and text style libraries, and sheet borders and title blocks. The Workspace includes pre-defined datagroup parameters.

1.3.9.1 USACE Revit Templates

The USACE Revit templates are discipline specific and include family content pertinent to that discipline. The templates share standard symbology such as annotation families, line styles, and text styles. The templates include pre-defined shared parameters.

1.3.10 USACE CAD/BIM Technology Center

The USACE CAD/BIM Technology Center hosts all standard content for USACE.

This content can be accessed through the CAD/BIM Technology Center website, https://cadbimcenter.erdc.dren.mil/ .

1.4 ORDER OF PRECEDENCE

In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between any of the requirements within the Contract, precedence is applied:

a. Any portions of the accepted proposal which both conform to and exceed the requirements of the solicitation.

b. The provisions of the solicitation.

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 3

c. All other provisions of the accepted proposal.

d. Any design products including, but not limited to, plans, specifications, engineering studies and analyses, shop drawings, and equipment installation drawings. These are "deliverables" under the contract are not part of the contract itself. Design products must conform to all provisions of the contract, in the order of precedence.

1.5 PRECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES

1.5.1 Design Quality Control Plan

Submit a Design Quality Control Plan in accordance with Section 01 45 00 QUALITY CONTROL before design may proceed.

1.5.2 Meetings and Conferences

1.5.2.1 Post Award Conference

The Government will conduct a post award conference at the project site , as soon as possible after Contract award, coordinated with issuance of the notice to proceed (NTP). Participation by the Contractor and major subcontractor representatives is mandatory. All designers need not attend this first meeting. The government will provide an agenda, meeting goals, meeting place, and meeting time to participants prior to the meeting.

As a minimum the following will be addressed during the conference:

determination and introduction of contact person and their authorities;

contract administration requirements; discussion of expected project progress processes; and coordination of subsequent meeting.

a. The government will introduce the Government project delivery team members, facility users, facility command representatives, and installation representatives.

b. Introduce key personal, major subcontractors and other needed staff.

c. Define expectations and duties of each participant.

d. Develop a meeting roster with complete contact information including name, office, project role, phone, mailing and physical address, and e-mail address for distribution to all participants. Also, provide minutes of the meeting to all participants.

1.5.2.2 Initial Design Conference

After Contract award, conduct the initial design conference, and provide a record of the meeting. All Designers of Record must participate in the conference. The primary purpose of the meeting is to make sure any needs are assigned and due dates established, as well as points of contact identified. The initial design conference may be scheduled and conducted at the project installation after the Post Award Conference and prior to initiation of significant preliminary design development, although it is recommended that the partnering process be initiated at the time of or before the initial design conference.

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 4

1.5.2.3 Advanced Modeling Kick-Off Meeting

Conduct an Advanced Modeling Kick-Off Meeting prior to submission of the Advanced Modeling PxP, within 45 days after Notice to Proceed. Required meeting attendance includes, at a minimum, the DOR, the design drawing and modeling specialist and the Geographic District BIM Manager or delegate.

The intent of this meeting is to coordinate the expectations for the Advanced Modeling PxP.

1.5.2.4 Advanced Modeling PxP Demonstration Meeting

Within 30 days after the acceptance of the Advanced Modeling PxP and M3, conduct a demonstration to review the Plan for clarification, and to verify the functionality of planned Model technology workflow and processes. If modifications are required, complete the modifications and resubmit the Advanced Modeling PxP performing a subsequent demonstration for Government acceptance.

1.5.2.3 Pre-Construction Conference

Before starting any construction activities, jointly conduct an administrative conference with the Government to discuss any outstanding requirements and to review local installation requirements. It is possible there will be multiple Pre-Construction Conferences based on the configuration of the design packages. Provide minutes of the meeting(s) to all participants.

1.6 SUBMITTALS

Each submittal includes an associated approval level designation as defined in the following table:

Approval Level Designation

Definition

G Government approval no designation for information only

D Designer of Record approval

C Government Conformance Review of Design

R Designer of Record Approval and Government Conformance Review

A Designer of Record Approval and Government Approval

When used, a designation following the approval level designation identifies the office that will review the submittal for the Government.

Submit the following in accordance with Section 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL

PROCEDURES:

SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

Advanced Modeling Project Execution Plan (PxP) ; C, RO

Design Quality Control Plan ; G, RO

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 5

Initial Design Conference

Preconstruction Conference

DCM Procedures ; G, RO

Submittal Register ; G, RO

SD-05 Design Data

Design and Code Checklists ; C, RO

Sustainable Design ; C, RO

Interim Design Submittals ; R, RO

Conference Documentation

Final Design Submittals ; R, RO

Design Complete Documents ; C, RO

SD-11 Closeout Submittals

DD Form 1354 ; A, RO

1.7 DESIGN QUALITY CONTROL

1.7.1 Design And Code Checklists

Develop and utilize appropriate discipline-specific checklists during the design and quality control of each submittal. Submit these completed checklists with each design submittal, as applicable, as part of the project documentation. See Section 01 45 00 QUALITY CONTROL and paragraph FIRE PROTECTION AND LIFE SAFETY CODE REVIEW for a sample Fire Protection and Life Safety Code Review checklist.

1.7.2 Advanced Modeling Project Execution Plan (PxP)

Develop an Advanced Modeling Project Execution Plan ("Plan" or "PxP") documenting mandatory and Contractor-elected BIM Uses, analysis technologies and workflows. Submit the PxP within 45 days after issuance of Notice to Proceed.

Use the USACE ADVANCED MODELING PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN (PxP) Template located at the USACE CAD/BIM Technology Center website to develop an acceptable Plan and update to include platforms and processes to meet the requirements of the project.

1.7.2.1 M3 Template

Use the M3 Template located at the USACE CAD/BIM Technology Center website and submit as part of the Advanced Modeling PxP.

1.7.2.2 Model Uses

Mandatory Model Uses are predefined in the Project Execution Plan (PxP) and cannot be modified. Identify additional elected Model Uses in the PxP.

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 6

1.8 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING

1.8.1 Electronic Design Submittal

Provide identical copies of discs for approval, for each submittal required. Provide quantities and sizes indicated in Section 01 33 00

SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES.

1.8.1.1 Malicious Content

Scan all electronic files for malicious viruses using commercially available scanning program that is routinely updated to identify and remove current virus threats.

1.8.1.2 Storage Media

Provide project data on disc-based (DVD±R/RW) media. Provide the full submittal on one single disc whenever possible. When separation of the submittal is required separate deliverables onto separate media. Document any media divisions in the PxP for approval by the Contracting Officer.

a. Directly print identification of contents onto storage media. Do not provide adhesived labels. Include the name of the submittal, project, project location, Contract number, Designer of Record firm/Prime Contractor company's name, title of submission, and security classification (in accordance with the applicable security classification labeling regulations) on the label. If multiple discs are provided, clearly document the contents of each disc on the label.

b. Include the name and contact information of the individual who produced the final data disc to ensure that any problems with the data or media can be easily resolved.

c. When browsed on any computer, the disc displays the following folders and their associated content:

(1) Submittal files (containing all submittal data)

(2) All supporting documents associated with the submittal

(3) Readme containing one TXT, PDF, or HTML file with general use information, organizational instructions, and basic preparer contact information.

1.8.2 Advanced Model File Packaging

Execute the following actions for all design drawing and modeling files:

1.8.2.1 Autodesk Revit, Civil3D, AutoCAD

a. Purge unused

b. Audit

c. Compress

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 7

1.8.2 PDF File Packaging

Utilize PDF file format in accordance with ISO 32000-1 and ISO 19005-3 .

Provide files from original sources, text-searchable, and saved in "Standard" (uncompressed) resolution whenever possible.

1.8.2.1 Bookmarking

a. Bookmark drawing submittal PDF sets to include one Parent Bookmark per Discipline and one Child Bookmark per sheet within each Discipline.

Format Parent Bookmarks as "Discipline" (e.g. Architectural). Format Child Bookmarks as "Sheet ID Sheet Title" (e.g. A-101 First Floor Plan).

b. Bookmark specification submittal PDF sets using the SpecsIntact Print Processing PDF Print/Publish feature, combining processed sections into one PDF document. Insert the Submittal Register into the file where specified by Section 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES and bookmark.

c. Bookmark design analysis and calculation submittal PDF sets to include one Parent Bookmark per design analysis section and one Child Bookmark per major paragraph per section. Format Parent Bookmarks as "Section" (e.g. Architectural). Format Child Bookmarks as "major paragraph designation Sheet Title" (e.g. 2.1 Primary Facility Functions).

1.8.3 Hardcopy Design Submittal

Print hard copy submittals directly from the electronically packaged PDF files. Provide quantities and sizes as indicated in Section 01 33 00

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.

The Designer(s) of Record stamps and signs the original full size hard copy sheets as Released For Construction. Provide distribution from this set.

PART 2 PRODUCTS

2.1 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED MATERIALS

The Government will provide Advanced Modeling files as GFM for use in design development. Develop and maintain the information and level of detail contained in the GFM in the Project design, as required by this Contract.

The Contractor has the option of preparing their own Advanced Modeling files in the formats prescribed as a basis for design, design drawings, and interim design submittals. If so, maintain the same level of detail, properties, and functionality in the models that is prescribed in this specification.

2.1.1 GFM Handover

The Government will provide the GFM at the Design Kick-Off Meeting.

2.1.2 GFM File Formats

GFM are provided in the following file formats:

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 8

2.1.2.1 Government Furnished BIM

The GFM includes Autodesk Revit, Version 2023.

2.1.2.2 Government Furnished CIM

The GFM includes Autodesk Civil3D, Version 2023.

2.1.2.3 Government Furnished GIS

The Installation's most current Standard GIS Database SDSFIE Adaptation will be furnished, including features and attributes relating to current project. Documentation of the required attributes and schema definitions will be provided with the GIS Template.

GIS source data and product data remain the property of the US Government.

Be prepared to explain and demonstrate the company's process for protecting all geospatial data, including but not limited to geometry, attributes, metadata, topologies, and relational database schemas and operations used in association with this contract. Signing a non-disclosure agreement attesting to the same before source data are released may be required. Obtain further information about security and nondisclosure requirements from the Contracting Officer.

a. Some installation map data, source and/or product, may be considered by the Government to be "Controlled Unclassified Information" (CUI) also known as "Sensitive but Unclassified" (SBU). Release of this information to any third party without the explicit consent of the Contracting Officer is not authorized.

b. Return all source information to the Government or destroy upon completion of this contract.

2.1.2.4 Government Furnished CAD

The GFM includes Autodesk AutoCAD, Version 2023.

2.1.3 Advanced Modeling Completion and Quality

The Government makes no guarantee that the BIM/CIM models, GIS data, CAD files and Facility Data provide the level of completeness or quality required for a submittal. Develop or update files and data to completely and correctly represent the as-built conditions of the facility and the site.

However, use of any Government Furnished BIM,CIM and GIS for creation of contract submittals is at the Contractor's own risk. Any quality control issues discovered in the GFM do not absolve the Contractor from submitting contract compliant deliverables as described in this and other specifications.

2.1.4 Data Loss, Corruption, and Error

Use of GFM files is at the Contractor's risk. Verify data integrity upon receipt and request a replacement if necessary.

Any adjustment of file structure, format, or software version required to make GFM compatible with computer systems and/or software is the responsibility of the Contractor.

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 9

2.2 ADVANCED MODELING DOCUMENTS

Provide all of the following documents with each design submittal.

2.2.1 Submitted Files List

Provide list of all submitted electronic files including a description, directory, and file name for each file submitted. Identify which files have been produced from the Model and Facility Data. For all Sheet files, include a list of the sheet titles and sheet numbers.

2.2.2 Advanced Modeling Submittal Checklist

Complete the USACE BIM/CIM Advanced Modeling Submittal Checklist and include with each submittal. Download the Checklist from the USACE CAD/BIM Technology Center website ( https://cadbimcenter.erdc.dren.mil/ ).

2.2.3 Advanced Modeling Electronic Files

Include all Advanced Modeling files associated with the contract scope of work.

2.2.3.1 3D Interactive Review Model

Provide a copy of each BIM Model in an approved interactive review format. Use Autodesk Navisworks or other Government Approved format documented in the PxP for the 3D Interactive Review Model format.

2.2.3.2 Industry Foundation Class (IFC) Coordination View

Provide an IFC Coordination View for all deliverables. Provide exported property set data for all IFC supported named building elements. Submit all IFC models in the IFC2x3 Coordination View V2.0 schema.

2.2.3.3 Quality Control (QC) Reports

As a minimum, include the following reports:

2.2.3.3.1 Model Standards Checks and Reports

Provide QC checks demonstrating adherence to the NCS v6.0 BIM Implementation section. Identify and report non-compliant elements and submit a corrective action plan. Provide the Government with detailed justification and request Government acceptance for any non-compliant elements that the Contractor proposes to be allowed to remain in the Model. Verify the following for the Model(s) and Facility Data set:

a. No undefined, incorrectly defined, or duplicated elements.

b. No errors when opening.

c. No broken Links, References, or X-References.

d. Minimized extraneous information.

e. Content uses the coordinate system defined in the approved PxP.

f. Models share a common alignment point.

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 10

g. For a Design Complete or Record Submittal; no unloaded Links, References, or X-References exist.

2.2.3.3.2 Graphics Standards Checks and Report

Provide QC checks on all graphic deliverables demonstrating that the fonts, dimensions, symbology and other construction document formatting are compliant with the requirements of this specification. Identify and report non-compliant content.

2.2.3.3.3 CAD Standards Checks and Report

Provide QC checks on CAD Output demonstrating that filenames, sheet borders, layer/level names, and symbology are compliant with the requirements of this specification. Identify and report non-compliant content.

2.2.3.3.4 Interference Management (3D Coordination) Checks and Report

Execute Interference Management checks and provide a summary of the results noting total hard interferences (e.g., mechanical vs. structural, or mechanical vs. mechanical, overlaps in the same location) and soft interferences (e.g., conflicts regarding equipment clearance, service access, fireproofing, insulation, code space requirements).

2.2.3.3.5 Additional Parameters

Additional QC parameters as deemed appropriate for the Project may be developed and documented in the Advanced Modeling PxP.

2.2.4 Advanced Modeling Re-Submittals

If components of an Advanced Modeling submittal are rejected, provide the following for each Advanced Modeling Re-Submittal, in addition to re-submittal information required by Section 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES:

a. Re-submit all components required under paragraph ADVANCED MODELING PACKAGE, including a new Advanced Modeling Checklist and updated content in response to Government comments.

b. Provide a copy of all Government review comments.

c. Provide a response to each Government review comment for back check.

2.2 DESIGN DRAWINGS

From advanced model files, pProduce design drawings that describe the scope of the Contract for all required submittals including all interim and final deliverables.

2.2.1 Electronic Drawing Files

Provide electronic drawing files in PDF format for each project drawing in the design set.

2.2.2 Drawing Index

Provide an index of drawings sheet as part of the drawing set, and an

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 11 electronic table of all drawings submitted. Include the electronic file name, the sheet reference number, the sheet number, and the sheet title containing the data for each drawing.

2.2.3 Shop Drawings Used as Design Drawings

Design drawings may be prepared similar to shop drawings to minimize construction submittals after the Design Complete Submittals. Prepare and submit with the design drawings, appropriate connection, fabrication, layout, and product specific drawings.

2.2.3.1 Drawing Format For Shop Drawings Used as Design Drawings

Use the Contractor-originated drawings as the basis for the record drawings. Conform shop drawings included as design documents with the same drawing requirements such as drawing format, sheet size, layering, lettering, and title block used in design drawings.

2.2.3.2 Identification of Shop Drawings Used as Design Drawings

Indicate which shop drawings are being submitted as design drawings in the transmittal letter.

2.2.4 Seal on Documents

Sign, date and seal all Contractor-originated design drawings by the registered architect or the registered engineer of the respective discipline. This is the seal of the Designer of Record for that drawing.

Application of the electronic seal and signature accepts responsibility for the work shown thereon.Seal required by the registered engineer or the registered architect is required to be a New York seal.

2.3 SPECIFICATIONS

Provide a Contractor-originated design specification that, in conjunction with the drawings, demonstrates compliance with materials, equipment, execution, and field quality control requirements of the RFP and accepted proposal.

2.3.1 Specifications Format

Utilize the Unified Facility Guide Specifications (UFGS) current at the time of Contract award. Process the specifications with the SpecsIntact software package.

a. Edit and expand the appropriate specifications to ensure that all project design requirements, current code requirements, and regulatory requirements are met. Design specifications may be prepared that include manufacturer specific data and catalog cuts in lieu of non-proprietary, descriptive specifications. Clearly identify, where appropriate, specific products chosen to meet the contract requirements (i.e., manufacturers' brand names and model numbers or similar product information).

b. Note that the UFGS are based on design-bid-build contracting and will require editing to apply to a design-build project. For instance, they assume that the Government will approve most submittals, whereas in design-build, the DOR has that action, unless this solicitation requires Government approval for specific submittals.

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 12

c. Organize project sections not based on UFGS in accordance with CSI MasterFormat and UFC 1-300-02 .

2.3.2 Identification of Manufacturer's Product Data Used as Specifications.

Provide complete and legible catalog cut sheets, product data, installation instructions, operation and maintenance instructions, warranty, and certifications for products and equipment for which final material and equipment choices have been made. Indicate, by prominent notation, each product that is being submitted including optional manufacturer's features, and indicate where the product data shows compliance with the Contract requirements.

2.3.3 Specifications Packaging

Provide specifications to include the following:

a. Cover sheet and project table of contents.

b. Specification sections, each section with a table of contents.

c. Manufacturer's Product Data. If providing as attachments to the applicable specification section, incorporate as attachment reference within the section and section table of contents.

d. Specification verfication reports such as brackets, Reference, and Submittal report.

e. Submittal register in .csv format and excel from SpecIntact

2.3.4 Specification Deliverable

Submit a bundled specification package in PDF format for each design package. As a minimum, bookmark each specification section in the bundled package. Also, submit the source files, in the processing system format, used to create the PDF.

2.4 DESIGN ANALYSIS

Prepare, organize, and present a design analysis that will document the general parameters, functional and technical requirements, design objectives, design assumptions, and provides design calculations applicable to a project's design. Organize the design analysis into three parts; Part 1 - General Description; Part 2 - Design Requirements and Provisions; and Part 3 - O&M Provisions.

The design analysis states the purpose, authorization, applicable criteria and the project description for the project, and provides a summary of the factors influencing the choice of the civil, environmental, architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, communications, fire protection, physical security systems, HTRW, and sustainable design features used in the project along with an indication of how the initial costs and life cycle costs were factored into final selections. In the final design analysis clearly and succinctly include:

a. An introductory description of the project concepts that addresses the salient points of the design

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 13

b. An orderly and comprehensive documentation of criteria and rationale for system selection, supported by life cycle cost analysis.

c. The identification of any necessary licenses and permits that are anticipated to be required as a part of the design and/or construction process.

d. Identify all applicable codes and criteria and highlight specific requirements within these codes and criteria for critical issues in the facility design.

e. Required calculations as specified and as needed to support the design.

f. Clearly identify " Sustainable Design " features that address high performance and sustainable building (HPSB) concepts as required by UFC 1-200-02 and current Army SDD Policy Update.

g. Clearly identify "Antiterrorism" requirement and document the antiterrorism and force protection features as required by UFC 4-010-01 .

2.4.1 Design Requirements and Provisions

Include subparts for each major design discipline and basic project design requirements for each discipline that justify and validate design decisions to include, but not limited to: life cycle cost effectiveness.

2.4.1.1 Civil

Include soil analysis and survey data, site design, site improvements, paving, grading and drainage, water, , contaminant containment, utilities systems analysis and design, and provisions for airfields, if required.

2.4.1.2 Environmental

Include an impact assessment checklist covering air, water and noise effects from the project and construction; worker health and safety; HTRW remediation cleanup and action levels; transportation and disposal regulation requirements; quality control for chemical sampling/analysis;

wetlands determination (nontidal); special wildlife, plant, and endangered species considerations; ground water, waterway and floodplain protection assessment; pollution prevention control requirements; and design measures to be implemented (i.e., construction site sediment and erosion control requirements by Federal, state and local governments); and hazardous material management, natural and cultural resources, and environmental permits.

2.4.1.3 Architectural

Include functional layout, signage, accessibility, security, air barriers, energy conservation and sustainable design to include site analysis focusing on orientation, space-mass composition, materials used and details with respect to image, safety, maintenance and cost effectiveness and historical context.

2.4.1.4 Structural

Include foundation, structural systems analysis and design.

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 14

2.4.1.5 Mechanical

Include heating and ventilation systems plumbing, energy conservation, noise and vibration control, and process systems design.

2.4.1.6 Electrical

Include power generation, transmission and distribution systems, lighting (interior and exterior), voice and video communications, utilities monitoring control systems (UMCS), lightning and static electricity protection systems analysis and design.

2.4.1.7 Physical Security

Include fencing, protective lighting, locks, andclear zones.

2.4.1.8 Cybersecurity

Include cybersecurity for systems being modified and impacted by the project scope of work.

2.4.2 Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Provisions

Identify design provisions made to enhance and to reduce the cost of operating and maintaining the facility when completed. Identify any special safety considerations or occupational health related considerations that may affect operation and maintenance activities as a result of the final design.

2.4.3 Design Analysis Packaging

2.4.3.1 Assembly and Identification

Assemble design analysis in a single volume with a table of contents if possible. Include a cover page in the basis of design for each discipline indicating the project title and locations, contract number, table of contents, and tabbed separations or bookmarks for quick reference. At a minimum tab or bookmark for each discipline.

2.4.4 Calculations

Place the signature and seal of the designer of record responsible for the work on the cover page of the calculations for the respective design discipline.

PART 3 EXECUTION

3.1 DESIGN SUBMITTALS

Include all deliverable products and associated support documents described in Part 2 of this specification with each design submittal.

3.2 DESIGN SUBMITTALS PHASES

The stages of design submittals described below define requirements with respect to process and content. Determine how to best plan and execute the design and review process for the project, within the parameters listed below. As a minimum, provide at least one interim design submittal, at least one final design submittal before construction of a

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 15 design package may proceed, and at least one Design Complete submittal that documents the accepted design.

3.2.1 Interim Design Submittals

Submit a single interim design for review, representing a complete package with all design disciplines. This is not necessarily a hold point for the design process; the Contractor may designate the interim design submittal(s) as a snapshot and proceed with design development at its own risk.

3.2.1.1 Interim Design Development Management

Maintain a fully functional configuration management system as described herein to track design revisions, regardless of whether or not there is a need for a formal interim design development review.

3.2.1.2 Fast-Tracking

Identify the project elements that will be fast-tracked in the Design Quality Control Plan.

3.2.1.3 Over-the-Shoulder Progress Review

To facilitate a streamlined design-build process, the Government and the Contractor may agree to one-on-one review or small group reviews, on-line, or at the Contractor's design offices or other agreed location, when practicable to the parties. Coordinate such reviews to minimize or eliminate disruptions to the design process. Due to limits on project funding, utilize the maximum virtual teaming methods. Facilitate these reviews with electronic format data transfer and collaboration. Through the partnering process, find ways to facilitate the quality assurance process and to facilitate meeting or bettering the design-build schedule.

3.2.1.4 Interim Design Development Review Waiver

The Government may agree to shorten or waive the formal interim design development review period for design package(s) if an effective, mutually agreeable partnering procedure is established and implemented for regular (e.g., weekly) over-the shoulder review. During the course of the procedure, keep the Government reviewers fully informed of the progress, contents, design intent, design documentation, and other pertinent factors of the design package.

3.2.2 Final Design Submissions

After acceptance of the interim design package, revise the design package to incorporate the comments generated and resolved, perform and document a back-check review and submit the final design package.

3.2.3 Design Complete Submittals

After the final design submission and review conference for a design package, revise the design package to incorporate the comments generated and resolved in the final review conferences, perform and document a back-check review and submit the final, design complete documents, which represents released for construction documents.

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 16

3.3 DESIGN PLATFORM AND FILE FORMATS

Design the project using the systems and platforms defined below:

3.3.1 BIM

The BIM submittal format is Autodesk Revit Version 2023. Provide the BIM submittals as fully operable, compatible, and editable within the native BIM/CIM tools.

3.3.2 CIM

The CIM submittal format is Autodesk Civil 3D version 2023. Provide the CIM submittals as fully operable, compatible, and editable within the native BIM/CIM tools.

3.3.3 GIS

Submit all GIS data in Environment Systems Research Institute's (ESRI) ArcGIS File Geodatabase, Version 3.5Autodesk AutoCAD Civil 3D, Version 2023 Bentley MicroStation, Version 2023 in compliance with SDSFIE, Version

3.1 and appropriate ISO 19115-1 metadata.

3.3.4 CAD

3.3.4.1 Native CAD Authoring Content

All content produced through CAD authoring software outside of any object/element based BIM or CIM platform must be compliant with ERDC/ITL TR-19-6 and ERDC/ITL TR-19-7 . Most recent version at the time of Contract award. Autodesk AutoCAD Template Files Most recent version at the time of Contract award. Download form the CAD/BIM Technology Center website as part of the A/E/C Work Structure.

3.3.4.2 CAD Extracted From BIM/CIM Authoring Platforms

Provide editable CAD sheet files extracted from the BIM or CIM files. CAD content exported from a BIM or CIM modeling platform must comply with ERDC/ITL TR-19-6 and NCS BIM Implementation section, part "2.0 Clarifications." ERDC/ITL TR-19-7 .

3.4 ADVANCED MODELING REQUIREMENTS

3.4.1 BIM and CIM Modeling Requirements

3.4.1.1 Minimum Modeling Requirements

Model to the requirements of the USACE M3 as identified in the approved Advanced Modeling PxP.

3.4.1.2 Graphics and Layer Standards

a. All content produced with object/element based BIM and CIM authoring software platforms must be compliant with ERDC/ITL TR-19-6 .

b. All content produced with layer-centric BIM or CIM authoring software must be compliant with ERDC/ITL TR-19-7 and ERDC/ITL TR-19-6 .

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 17

3.4.1.3 USACE Platform Configuration Standards

USACE Revit Templates, most recent version at the time of Contract award.

Download from the USACE CAD/BIM Technology Center website and, if required, upgrade to the Contract approved software version.

3.4.1.4 Classification

Include Facility Data referencing one or more classification system(s) identified in the M3 for all modeled elements.

3.4.1.5 BIM Coordinate System

a. Coordinate System: State Plane

b. Zone (for State Plane or UTM): Central

c. Horizontal Units of Measure: US Survey Feet

d. Vertical Units of Measure: Feet

e. Horizontal Datum: NAD 83/2011

f. Vertical Datum: NAVD 88

3.4.1.6 CIM Coordinate System

a. Coordinate System: State Plane

b. Zone (for State Plane or UTM): Central

c. Horizontal Units of Measure: US Survey Feet

d. Vertical Units of Measure: Feet

e. Horizontal Datum: NAD 83/2011

f. Vertical Datum: NAVD 88

3.4.1.7 Modeling Schedules

Comply with the NCS BIM Implementation section, part "2.4 Schedules."

Produce schedules from, and link to, the Facility/Site Data within the Model. Document any exceptions in the PxP and submit for review.

3.4.1.8 Details and Enlarged Sections

Comply with the NCS BIM Implementation section, part "3.2 Model Coordination and Delivery." Derive all details and enlarged sections necessary for construction from the Model when possible. For those details and enlarged sections not derived directly from the Model, verify that geometry and data depicting the details and enlarged sections are consistent with Model elements. Details with significant drafted content such as 'standard' and 'typical' details cannot contradict the model and must utilize the model as an underlay when possible for the purposes of verification and coordination. Three dimensional, isometric, and section isometric details derived from the model are preferred. Create details and enlarged sections that are not derived from the Model using native authoring tools within the Model or be embedded within the Model.

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 18

3.4.1.9 Drawing Indices

Comply with the NCS BIM Implementation section, part "2.3 Sheet Organization." Where BIM authoring platform supports it, derive drawing indices from a model-driven schedule.

3.4.2 GIS

3.4.2.1 Minimum Modeling Requirements

Provide final geo-referenced GIS database of the new building footprints, and site surface and subsurface features that exist outside the building footprint(s) out to the project extents compliant with current SDSFIE Adaptation.

Collect GIS geo-referenced data pertaining to location and attribute data of subsurface utilities obtained at the time of project site excavation.

Include the collection of elevation (Z) values in all data collection for underground utilities.

3.4.2.2 GIS Coordinate System

a. Coordinate System: State Plane

b. Zone (for State Plane or UTM): Central

c. Horizontal Datum: NAD 83/2011

d. Vertical Datum: NAVD 88

e. Horizontal Units of Measure: US Survey Feet

f. Vertical Units of Measure: Feet

3.4.2.3 Standard GIS Database SDSFIE Adaptation

Use the Standard GIS Database SDSFIE Adaptation provided by the Installation Geospatial Support Office to produce the GIS deliverables required under this contract.

3.4.3 CAD

All content produced through layer-centric CAD authoring software outside of any object/element based BIM or CIM platform must be compliant with ERDC/ITL TR-19-7 and ERDC/ITL TR-19-6 .

. Autodesk AutoCAD Template Files, Most recent version at the time of Contract award. Download form the CAD/BIM Technology Center website as part of the A/E/C Work Structure.

3.4 DESIGN CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT (DCM)

3.4.1 Procedures

Develop and maintain effective, DCM procedures to control and track all revisions to the design documents subsequent to the Interim Design Submission and continuing through submission of the As-Built documents.

After the final design is accepted, this process provides control of and

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 19 documents revisions to the accepted design (See Special Contract Requirement: Deviating From the Accepted Design). Submit the DCM procedures within the Design Quality Control Plan.

a. Include authorities and concurrences in the DCM system to authorize revisions, including documentation as to why the revision is required.

b. An internal system may be used with interactive Government concurrences or the Government's "Dr Checks Design Review and Checking System" may be used.

c. Make the DCM data available to the Government reviewers at all times.

3.4.2 Tracking Design Review Comments

Although an internal system for overall design configuration management is allowed, use the DrChecks Design Review and Checking System to initiate, respond to, resolve and track Government design review comments.

The Government will set up the project in DrChecks. Throughout the design process parties enter, track, and back-check comments using the DrChecks system. Designers of Record annotate comments timely and specifically to indicate exactly the action to be taken or why the action is not required. After the design review conference and prior to the next design submittal for the package, the DORs annotate those comments that require DOR action or design revision to show how and where it has been addressed in the design documents. These procedures are part of the required design configuration management plan. Flag comments considered critical by the conference participants.

3.4.2.1 DrChecks Initial Account Set-Up

Identify a contact person within the office to act as the administrator for all Contractor personnel, including subcontractors, that will be accessing the PROJNET Dr Checks system. Through the Contracting Officer, coordinate with the Project Manager and the District PROJNET administrator for system access, system instruction and comment process instructions.

PROJNET contains an introductory file and other tutorial material that can be accessed once user accounts have been established. Upon log in, select Portals/User Documentation.

3.4.2.2 DrChecks Review Comments

Annotate and resolve all comments prior to the next submittal. Include the DrChecks comments and responses in the design analysis for record in the next design submittal for the package.

a. Upon review of comments prior to the design review conference, the DOR(s) evaluate the comments. Include exactly what action will be taken or why action is not required.

b. After the review conference, the DOR(s) formally respond to each applicable comment in DrChecks a second time, prior to the next submittal, clearly indicating what action was taken and what drawing/spec/analysis changed. Designers of Record are encouraged to directly contact reviewers to discuss and agree to the formal comment responses rather than relying only on DrChecks and review meetings to discuss comments. With the next design submittal, reviewers will

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 20 back-check answers to the comments against the new submittal, in addition to reviewing additional design work.

c. Clearly annotate in DrChecks those comments that require effort outside the requirements of the contract. Do not proceed with work outside the contract until a modification to the contract is properly executed.

3.5 DISCIPLINE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

Provide interim design deliverables that include drawings, specifications, and design analysis for the part of design that the Contractor considers ready for review.

a. Drawings: Include comments from any previous design conferences incorporated into the documents to provide an interim design for the feature of work submitted.

b. Specifications: Provide specifications to ensure that all project design features are addressed, meeting current code requirements, and regulatory requirements. Use the track changes feature (redlines) to facilitate review of additions and deletions.

c. Design Analysis: Prepare and present design analysis under the authority of the DOR, with calculations necessary to substantiate and support all design documents submitted. Address design substantiation required by the applicable codes and references.

3.5.1 Geotechnical Investigations and Reports

Perform additional geotechnical investigations, as necessary, to determine the conditions for the actual locations of footings, other foundations and site paving features and other site features.

Submit a final geotechnical evaluation report, prepared by the licensed geotechnical engineer, along with the first foundation design submittal.

Make this information available as early as possible during the over-the-shoulder progress review process.

a. Summarize the subsurface conditions and provide recommendations for the design of appropriate utilities, foundations, floor slabs, retaining walls, embankments, and pavements.

b. Include compaction requirements for fill and backfill under buildings, sidewalks, other structures and open areas.

c. Recommend foundation systems to be used, allowable bearing pressures for footings, lateral load resistance capacities for foundation systems, elevations for footings, grade beams, slabs, etc.

d. Provide an assessment of post-construction settlement potential including total and differential.

e. Provide recommendations regarding lateral earth pressures (active, at-rest, passive) to be used in the design of retaining walls. Include the recommended spectral accelerations and Site Class for seismic design along with an evaluation of any seismic hazards and recommendations for mitigation, if required.

SECTION 01 33 16.00 10 Page 21

f. Include calculations to support the recommendations for bearing capacity, settlement, and pavement sections.

g. Include supporting documentation for all recommended design parameters such as Site Class, shear strength, earth pressure coefficients, friction factors, subgrade modulus, California Bearing Ratio (CBR).

h. Provide earthwork recommendations, expected frost penetration, expected groundwater levels, recommendations for dewatering and groundwater control and the possible presence of any surface or subsurface features that may affect the construction of the project such as sinkholes, boulders, shallow rock, old fill, old structures, soft areas, or unusual soil conditions.

i. Include pH tests, salinity tests, resistivity measurements, etc., required to design corrosion control and grounding systems.

j. Include the raw field data.

3.5.1.1 Inconsistency with the Preliminary Soils Information

Arrange a meeting with the Government subsequent to completion and evaluation of the site specific geotechnical exploration to outline any differences encountered that are inconsistent with the Government provided preliminary soils information. Clearly outline differences which require changes in the foundation type, or pavement and earthwork requirements from that possible and contemplated using the Government furnished preliminary soils investigation, which result in a change to the design or construction.

3.5.1.2 Vehicle Pavements

Provide flexible and rigid pavement designs, as applicable for the project, including design CBR and modulus of subgrade reaction and the required compaction effort for subgrades and pavement layers. Also, provide information on the types of base course materials available in the area and design strengths.

3.5.1.3 Certification

With the professional geotechnical engineer consultant, certify in writing that the design of the project has been developed consistent with the Contractor's final geotechnical report. Submit the certification, stamped by the consulting professional geotechnical engineer, with the first design submission. If revisions are made to the initial design submission, provide a new certification with the final design submission.

3.5.2 Civil Site and Utilities Design Contents

Include the following in the interim…