RFI log for posting 9.23.26.xlsx

Sheet1

JBMDL preference is for the Siemens 9410 meter. An alternative option is the Schneider 8650. However, we were recently informed that this meter will no longer be manufactured.

2 Willdan AE 2-Sep Battery Energy Storage System Capacity Discrepancy The solicitation appears to contain conflicting BESS sizing information.

The drawings identify three Battery Energy Storage Systems rated at approximately 500 kW / 500 kWh each (total nominal capacity approximately 1.5 MWh).

However, Specification Section 26 37 appears to identify each BESS as approximately 500 kW / 1.5 MWh (total nominal capacity approximately 4.5 MWh).

Question:

Please confirm the required BESS power rating and energy-storage capacity for:

Reason for clarification:

The discrepancy materially affects equipment selection, footprint, fire protection requirements, controls integration, commissioning requirements, and project pricing. Each individual BESS: 500KW/KWH Total System Power Capacity: 1.5MW Total System Energy Capacity: 1.5MWH

The solicitation references a wage determination associated with Burlington County, New Jersey.

The project site appears to be located at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in Ocean County, New Jersey.

Question:

Please confirm the applicable Davis-Bacon wage determination for this project and whether the current wage determination reference is correct. The Government acknowledges the inquiry regarding the geographic location of the project site at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst.

To ensure compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act and physical project requirements, the Government is issuing a revised Wage Determination. General Decision Number NJ20260039, dated 05/18/2026, for Ocean County, New Jersey, is hereby incorporated into this solicitation under Amendment 0004. Offerors must utilize these revised rates when preparing and submitting their final proposals.

4 Willdan CT/PM 2-Sep Site Walk Date Clarification The solicitation references a site visit as occurring on "Friday, 03 September 2026."

However, 03 September 2026 falls on a Thursday.

Question:

The specifications reference integration between the new microgrid control system and existing installation systems.

Question:

Please identify:

· Existing SCADA platform manufacturer

· Existing SCADA software version

· Existing communication protocols

· Existing cybersecurity boundary requirements

The specifications include multiple references to cybersecurity support and RMF activities.

Question:

Please clarify:

· Required contractor cybersecurity deliverables

· Expected contractor participation in RMF activities

· Authority-to-Operate support requirements

· Government-furnished versus contractor-developed documentation responsibilities Cybersecurity / RMF Requirements The specifications include multiple references to cybersecurity support and RMF activities.

Question:

Please clarify:

· Required contractor cybersecurity deliverables

· Expected contractor participation in RMF activities

· Authority-to-Operate support requirements

The Supplementary Instructions to Bidders references Contractor Representatives are responsible for reviewing and commenting on evaluations submitted on the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System Question:

Question: Paragraph 1.6.3 of Section 09 90 00 of the specifications requires the use of an SSPC QP 1 certified painter. Paragraph 2.3 of Section 09 60 00 of the specifications requires the use of an MPI 163 approved product for this project. MPI 163 is a Water-Based Emulsion, Semi-Gloss (MPI Gloss Level 5) Paint, suitable for both industrial and architectural exterior wood & metal surfaces.

SSPC QP 1 certified painters are certified to perform field coating applications on complex industrial and marine structures such as bridges, offshore drilling platforms, wastewater treatment facilities, and storage tanks. They are typically large metal structures requiring abrasive blast cleaning and spray painting. Additionally, the UFGS 09 90 00 – Paints and Coatings provides guidance for the designer, stating, “Use bracket option below concerning SSPC QR 1 only when industrial coatings are required”.

The painting work on this project does not seem to fall within the category of structures typically reserved for the requirements of SSPC QP 1. Additionally, This requirement will prohibit local experienced, small business painting subcontractors from being able to perform the work and will result in a substantial increase in the cost of this work, which will be reflected in the prime contractors’ bids submitted to the Government.

Sheet: S-501 Detail: K15 Spec:

Question: On Sheet S-501 Detail K15 calls out a typical exterior pad detail. Note 2 of this detail reads, “Dimension in any horizontal direction shall not exceed 11’-0””. Detail A1 on Sheet S-501 gives the equipment pad detail for the BESS and Generators.

The 16’ x 20’ Electrical Equipment Pad on Sheet CS111 and the 5’ x 15’ Electrical Switchgear Pad on Sheet CS112 are both too large to use the Typical Exterior Pad Detail. They are also neither the BESS or Generator.

Sheet: CS112 & M-501 Detail:

Spec:

Question: Sheet CS112 shows a 2” Natural Gas Line. Sheet M-501 Detail J14 calls out a 4” Natural Gas Line. Sheet CS112 also calls out an underground electric line as “Gas Line”

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: 01 58 00 – Project Identification

Question: With regard to the Project Identification Sign on this project, Paragraph 1.4 of Section 01 58 00 of the specifications states, “Construct the sign in accordance with project sign detail, which can be downloaded at: http://www.wbdg.org/ffc/dod/unified-facilities-guide-specifications-ufgs/forms-graphics-tables.”

This link is broken and does not load. However, when navigating to the Whole Building Design Guide (WBDG) and navigating to the UFGS Forms, Graphics, and Tables page the project sign details that are available show many different sizes and styles of signs depending on the type of MILCON project and do not address a project safety sign at all.

Paragraph 1.4.1 also mentions both Navy and Air Force and refers to the signs being, “created in the design indicated,”

Paragraph 1.4.3 of Section 01 58 00 of this same specification refers us to EP 310-1-6a for the “construction project sign package.”

Will the Government please confirm our assumption that we are to utilize Publication EP-310-a-6a for the typical construction project sign package. Additionally, if we are to utilize the WBDG sign details please provide the exact sign type, size, and style required including the correct decal identification required. Follow the link provided in https://www.wbdg.org/dod/ufgs/ufgs-01-58-00 for Project sign details, attachment A. Refer to EP-310-a-6a, section 16-1, 16-2 and 16-3, 16-4 for Project safe sign and related requirements.

Para 1.4.1 is referring to the logo. Please download the zip folder in the link provided to correctly locate the Air Force Logo.

13 DAVID BOLAND, INC CT 4-Sep 1. Discipline: Contacting Sheet:

Detail:

Spec:

Question: General Decision Number: NJ20260027 /7/28/2026 provided in the Solicitation is for the County of Burlington, NJ. Since this location of the Joint Base is located in Ocean County New Jersey, will the Government please provide the General Decision Number for Ocean County.

The Government acknowledges the inquiry regarding the geographic location of the project site at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst.

To ensure compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act and physical project requirements, the Government is issuing a revised Wage Determination. General Decision Number NJ20260039, dated 05/18/2026, for Ocean County, New Jersey, is hereby incorporated into this solicitation under Amendment 0004. Offerors must utilize these revised rates when preparing and submitting their final proposals.

14 DAVID BOLAND, INC PM 4-Sep 1. Discipline: Contracting Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Standard Form 1442

Question: The solicitation provides 720 calendar days from the Notice to Proceed (“NTP”) to complete the project.

As the Government is aware, there is a substantial amount of specialized equipment and material that will be required to be provided by the Contractor, much of which will require a substantial amount of time to prepare/review/approve submittals and then fabricate and deliver before the physical work, integration, start-up, check-out, testing, and commissioning can be performed. Much of this specialized equipment and material will require months (and in some cases, over a year) to procure after approval of the submittals.

It is understood that the Contractor will be required to diligently begin the preparation/review/submission of the submittals upon the Government’s issuance of the NTP so that the fabrication of the equipment and materials required for the project will begin as soon as possible.

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Standard Form 1442

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 32 31 13 – Chain Link Fences and Gates

Question: Subpart 2.2.1 – Fabric of Section 32 31 13 of the specifications states, “Provide fabric consisting of wires woven into a 1 inch diamond mesh.”

It is unusual for the Government to specify “1-inch” mesh for this particular application of chain-link fences and gates; “2-inch” mesh is more commonly specified.

Sheet: CS112 Detail:

Spec:

Question: There are existing pavement markings located where the existing asphalt pavement is required to be cut and patched for the electrical duct bank routed between the existing electrical manhole (“A7”) and the new pad-mounted medium voltage switch (“SW-1”).

Sheet: CD111 Detail:

Spec:

Question: General Sheet Note 4 on Sheet ID CD111 of the contract drawings states, “Prior to installation of PV array, remove all vegetation from paved surfaces, apply weed repellent and seal all cracks in existing pavement.”

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 32 11 26 – Hot-Mix Bituminous Base Course for Roads and Streets

Question: Subpart 2.5 – Recycled Asphalt Pavement of Section 32 11 26 of the specifications states, “RAP is not permitted.”

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 26 08 00 – Apparatus Inspection and Testing

Question: Subpart 1.4.1 – Qualifications of Section 26 08 00 of the specifications states, “Organization must be independent of the supplier, manufacturer, and installer of the equipment. The organization must be a first-tier subcontractor. No work required by this section of the specification may be performed by a second-tier subcontractor.”

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 26 08 00 – Apparatus Inspection and Testing

Question: Subpart 1.2 – Related Requirements of Section 26 12 19 – Pad-Mounted, Liquid-Filled, Medium-Voltage Transformers of the specifications states, “Section 26 08 00 APPARATUS INSPECTION AND TESTING applies to this section, with the additions and modifications specified herein.” However, Section 26 12 19 – Pad-Mounted, Liquid-Filled, Medium-Voltage Transformers of the specifications is missing from the list of specification sections included within Subpart 3.1 of Section 26 08 00 of the specifications.

Will the Government please clarify if Section 26 12 19 – Pad-Mounted, Liquid-Filled, Medium-Voltage Transformers of the specifications should be added to the list of specification sections included within Subpart 3.1 of Section 26 08 00 of the specifications?

Sheet: CS502 Detail:

Spec: Section 01 50 00 – Temporary Construction Facilities and Controls

Question: Subparts 2.3.2, 2.3.3, and 3.6.2 of Section 01 50 00 of the specifications specify the that temporary chain-link fencing is to be “6 feet high.” However, details H1, H8, and H15 on Sheet ID CS502 of the contract drawings indicate that the temporary chain-link fencing is to be 7’-0” high.

Sheet: CS502 Detail:

Spec: Section 01 50 00 – Temporary Construction Facilities and Controls

Question: When constructing the long runs of new duct banks not located within the two larger Limit of Construction Areas—for example, duct bank A1/ES502 that runs between the PV area and the Generator/BESS area, and duct bank H11/ES501 that runs between the Generator/BESS area and existing Building 678—will the Government please confirm our understanding that the Contractor will be able to utilize temporary orange safety fencing for these areas (in lieu of temporary chain-link fencing that will be provided around the PV area, Generator/BESS area, and temporary trailer area)?

This would seem logical, as the long runs of new duct banks type work is more linear/utility in nature.

Sheet: CS111, S-501 Detail:

Spec:

Sheet: M-501 Detail:

Spec:

Question: Note(s) 2 and 3 with the Natural Gas Pressure Regulator With Meter detail J14 on Sheet ID M-501 of the contract drawings contemplates “confirm[ing]” the natural gas regulator assembly layout and pad size with the “Utility Provider.” However, the contract drawings and specifications do not include any information associated with any “Utility Provider[s].”

If the Contractor is required to coordinate with and/or have any work performed by any “Utility Provider” (for any type of utility on this project), will the Government please update the contract documents to clarify the following:

Sheet: ED401, ES401 Detail:

Spec:

Question: Sheet Keynote 3 on Sheet ID ED401 of the contract drawings states, “Disconnect and remove existing service transformer. Maintain existing secondary feeders for re-use. Refer to ES100 series for additional information.”

Sheet Keynote 4 on Sheet ID ES401 of the contract drawings states, “Splice existing secondary transformer feeders to new MC-1 feeders in above grade pullbox.”

Will the Government please confirm our understanding that the existing concrete pad (for the existing service transformer that is to be removed) may be reused for the new electrical pullbox?

Sheet: ED401 Detail:

Spec:

Question: Sheet Keynote 2 on Sheet ID ED401 of the contract drawings states, “Disconnect and remove existing metal enclosed medium voltage load interrupter switch, SW-A11.”

Sheet: ED401 Detail:

Spec:

Question: Sheet Keynote 10 on Sheet ID ED401 of the contract drawings states, “Disconnect and remove existing primary ductbank from transformer T3-A11 and medium voltage load interrupter switch back to existing to remain manhole A7.”

Will the Government please confirm our understanding that the existing ductbank (whether it be concrete encased or non-concrete encased) may remain and be abandoned in place? (It is understood that the existing electrical cables would still need to be removed.)

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 09 06 00 – Schedules for Finishes // Section 09 90 00 – Paints and Coatings

Question: Subpart(s) 2.1.1.1 – Paint and 2.3 – Placement Schedule of Section 09 06 00 of the specifications describe “Exposed galvanized steel (conduit),” “above ground conduits,” and “new at grade elec. service equip. and cabinets” (at “B678 exterior wall of main elec. room”) as requiring painting. Additionally, Subpart 1.1.3a.(1) – Mechanical and Electrical Painting of Section 09 90 00 of the specifications describes “Exposed conduit and at grade electric service equipment” as requiring painting.

It is unclear as to exactly which items the Government will require field-painting.

Is our understanding correct, that the only field-painting (of “[e]xposed conduit and at grade electric service equipment”) required will be of the conduit/box/fittings exposed on the exterior wall of Building 678 (as indicated by detail A13 / ES507)?

If field-painting of any other new electrical equipment (such as the two (2) generators, three (3) BESS, switchgear enclosure [and adjacent electrical panel enclosures], above-grade pullbox, pad-mounted switch, pad-mounted transformer, and electrical equipment enclosures located to the plan east of the PV Array area) is required, will the Government please clarify such?

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 01 45 35 – Special Inspections

Question: The “Schedule of Special Inspections” mentioned in Subpart 1.2 of Section 01 45 35 of the specifications is missing from the attachments to that section. (It appears the “Statement of Special Inspections” was inadvertently attached twice.)

Sheet: M-701 through M-705 Detail:

Spec:

Sheet: M-702 Detail:

Spec:

Question: Note 3 on Sheet ID M-702 of the contract drawings states, “120-volt single phase power connection junction boxes have been provided for use to power DDC system components. These junction boxes are shown on the electrical power plan drawings. The DDC controls contractor is responsible for all power wiring and components downstream of these junction boxes and verifying the quantity and location of the junction boxes is adequate. Additional power connections are the responsibility of the DDC controls contractor.”

We are unable to locate where these “120-volt single phase power connection junction boxes” are shown on the electrical power plan drawings.

Sheet: E-002 Detail:

Spec:

Question: General Note 2 on Sheet ID E-002 of the contract drawings makes mention of “utility interconnection requirements.”

Since this project is a design-bid-build type project, will the Government please confirm our understanding that by constructing the new work per the requirements contained throughout the contract drawings and specifications, that all “utility interconnection requirements” will be satisfied?

Sheet: EP701 Detail:

Spec:

Question: The Partial One-Line Diagram A – New Work detail A1 on Sheet ID EP701 of the contract drawings shows two (2) “100% Rated Load Bank[s]”—one load bank at each new generator.

It is unclear who provides these load banks.

Will the Government please clarify if the load banks are:

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 09 90 00 – Paints and Coatings

Question: Subpart 1.6.2 – Coating Contractor’s Qualification of Section 09 90 00 of the specifications includes requirements regarding the experience of the coating contractor. However, it appears that the Government may have inadvertently included Subpart 1.6.3 – SSPC QP 1 Certification of Section 09 90 00 of the specifications in the specifications as well.

Subpart 1.6.3 states, "Contractors that perform surface preparation or coating application on steel substrates must be certified by the Society for Protective Coatings (formerly Steel Structures Painting Council) (SSPC) to the requirements of SSPC QP 1 prior to Contract award, and must remain certified while accomplishing any surface preparation or coating application."

Per the SSPC website (now AMPP), QP 1 certification is primarily meant to attest to the ability to apply coatings on complex structures, such as bridges, industrial tanks, marine vessels, water/wastewater facilities, and power plants.

Additionally, the UFGS 09 90 00 – Paints and Coatings provides guidance for the designer, stating, "Use bracket option below concerning SSPC QP 1 only when industrial coatings are required. Painting qualifications for projects such as BEQ's, training facilities and general administration buildings do not require QP 1 certification."

The painting for this project does not appear to fall within the categories of structures typically reserved for the requirements of SSPC QP 1.

This requirement will prohibit local experienced, small business painting subcontractors from being able to perform the work and will result in a substantial increase in the cost of this work, which will be reflected in the prime contractors' bids submitted to the Government.

SSPC QP 1 certified painting contractors typically do not perform painting work for the types of surfaces that are required to be painted for this project.

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 03 30 00 – Cast-In-Place Concrete

Question: Subpart 1.6.9c – Laboratory Accreditation – Contractor Quality Control of Section 03 30 00 of the specifications states, "All sampling and testing must be performed by an approved, onsite, independent, accredited laboratory."

Sheet: S-001 Detail:

Spec:

Question: Geotechnical, Source Note 1 on Sheet ID S-001 of the contract drawings states, “Geotechnical Report: JB MDL EV Charging Infrastructure Lakehurst Naval Engineering Station, GEI Consultants, Inc. December 2024.”

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 01 11 00 – Summary of Work

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 01 45 00 – Quality Control

Question: Subpart 1.6.2.2 – Quality Control (QC) Manager, Qualifications of Section 01 45 00 of the specifications requires the Quality Control (“QC”) Manager to “possess at least a Bachelor's degree in engineering, architecture, or construction management, with a current professional engineer registration in a US State or Territory or a current licensed architect in a US State or Territory . . .”

The requirements for the QC Manager to be a Professional Engineer (“PE”) or Licensed Architect appear to be excessive for the level of complexity of the project. This requirement is more commonly found on design-build projects; however, this project is a design-bid-build project.

Will the Government please consider removing the requirement for the QC Manager to have a “current professional engineer registration in a US State or Territory or a current licensed architect in a US State or Territory” from the requirements for this project?

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 01 35 26 – Governmental Safety Requirements

Question: Will the Government please confirm our understanding that, for this project, the Site Safety and Health Officer (“SSHO”) is to be assigned no other duties other than SSHO?

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 01 45 00 – Quality Control

Question: Subpart 1.6.2.1 – Quality Control (QC) Manager, Duties of Section 01 45 00 of the specifications states, “In addition to implementing and managing the QC program, the QC Manager may perform the duties of Project Superintendent.”

Will the Government please confirm our understanding that the QC Manager will in fact be able to also perform the duties for Project Superintendent for this project?

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Standard Form 1442

Question: The solicitation indicates that the bids are due to 2:00 p.m. on Monday, 28 September 2026.

We respectfully request that the Government consider shifting the bid due date to another business day.

A Monday morning bid due date significantly limits the contractor’s ability to finalize bids after the close of business on the preceding day, as during the weekend, subcontractors, suppliers, and other key personnel are generally unavailable to respond to last-minute questions, provide clarifications, resolve discrepancies, and submit revised pricing.

In addition, many subcontractors and suppliers routinely submit their final quotes on the last business day before the bid due date. A Monday morning bid due date essentially eliminates the opportunity for meaningful review, coordination, and confirmation of those quotes before submitting the bids.

Providing a bid due date on another business day would allow the contractors to complete appropriate and thorough review, improve the accuracy and completeness of the bids, and encourage greater competition, ultimately benefiting the Government through more competitive pricing. The Government has evaluated the request to shift the bid due date. Due to strict fiscal year-end funding availability constraints, the deadline cannot be extended beyond the end of the fiscal year.

To maximize competition and accommodate contractor coordination needs as much as possible, the Government is granting a partial extension. The bid due date is hereby shifted from Monday, 28 September 2026, to Wednesday, 30 September 2026 at 2:00 PM EDT.

This change is officially incorporated into the solicitation under Amendment 0004. Offerors must acknowledge this amendment in their proposals.

43 DAVID BOLAND, INC PM 4-Sep 1. Discipline: Contracting Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 01 30 00 – Administrative Requirements

Question: Subparts 1.14 through 1.14.1g of Section 01 30 00 of the specifications require formal partnering be conducted for this project.

Subpart 1.14f states, “Host follow-on Partnering Sessions at three- to six-month intervals or more frequently if needed and lasting generally a half day or less. Attendees need only be those required to resolve current issues. The same Facilitator used in the Initial Partnering session must lead the follow-on sessions unless an alternative is permitted by the Contractor Officer.”

Will the Government please clarify the following:

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 01 32 01.00 10 – Project Schedule

Question: Subpart 3.6.1 – Periodic Schedule Update Meetings of Section 01 32 01.00 06 of the specifications states, " The Contractor scheduler must attend in person unless virtual attendance is approved by Contracting Officer.”

With the user-friendliness of current technology, it has become customary for the Scheduler to participate in update meetings virtually.

Will the Government please consider allowing the Scheduler to attend and perform their duties virtually during the Periodic Schedule Update Meetings?

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 00 72 00 – General Conditions

Sheet: EG101 through EG502 Detail:

Spec: Section 26 41 00 – Lightning Protection System

Question: Section 26 41 00 – Lightning Protection System is included in the specifications, and includes generic lightning protection system requirements. However, neither the specifications nor the contract drawings indicate specifically where the lightning protection system is to be provided. Sheet IDs EG101 through EG502 of the contract drawings indicates certain grounding and bonding requirements; however, do not clarify where lightning protection system(s) are specifically required.

Sheet: ES401 Detail:

Spec:

Question: HH-12 is indicated on Sheet ID ES401 of the contract drawings; however, HH-12 is not included in the Handhole Schedule on the Electrical Handhole detail A7 on Sheet ID ES503 of the contract drawings.

Sheet: EP701 Detail:

Spec:

Question: General Sheet Note 4 on Sheet ID EP701 of the contract drawings states, “As soon as practical after award, Contractor must connect a power meter to the main service at SWGR-1 and record the power for at least 30 days. This data must be submitted to the 87 CES and COR for review at least six weeks prior to any equipment submittals.”

Will the Government please clarify if this power meter is required to be permanent (and remain in place)?

Sheet: ES102, EP701 Detail:

Spec:

Question: The size/characteristics of the new pad-mounted medium-voltage switch indicated by Sheet Keynote 2 on Sheet ID ES102 of the contract drawings does not match the size/characteristics of the new pad-mounted medium-voltage switch indicated by the Partial One-Line Diagram A – New Work detail A1 on Sheet ID EP701 of the contract drawings.

Sheet: ES103, EP701 Detail:

Spec:

Question: The size/characteristics of the new pad-mounted utility transformer indicated by Sheet Keynote 6 on Sheet ID ES103 of the contract drawings does not match the size/characteristics of the new pad-mounted utility transformer indicated by the Partial One-Line Diagram A – New Work detail A1 on Sheet ID EP701 of the contract drawings.

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 48 18 00 – Battery Energy Storage System

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 01 50 00 – Temporary Construction Facilities and Controls

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 26 37 13 – Microgrid Control System

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 26 32 15 – Engine-Generator Set Stationary, 15-2500 KW, With Auxiliaries

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 26 31 00 – Facility-Scale Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Systems

Sheet: C-002 Detail:

Spec:

Question: Existing Condition Note 6 on Sheet ID C-002 of the contract drawings states, “Special handling and consideration is required for excavated soils thought to contain contaminated substances.”

Since the contract drawings (and specifications) do not indicate (specify) any "excavated soils thought to contain contaminated substances," the bidders cannot determine prior to bidding the project the extent to which any existing soils may or may not be contaminated.

Therefore, will the Government please confirm our understanding that, if contaminated soils are actually encountered during construction, the Government will consider the additional work a change and will issue an equitable adjustment for the costs and impacts from this changed work?

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 01 78 00 – Closeout Submittals

Question: Requirements related to “Advanced Modeling” are included within Section 01 78 00 of the specifications.

Sheet:

Detail:

Spec: Section 01 57 19 – Temporary Environmental Controls

Question: Subpart 1.5 – Special Environmental Requirements of Section 01 57 19 of the specifications states, “Comply with the special environmental requirements listed here and attached at the end of this section.