Amendment_01.pdf

0011478172

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Purpose of Amendment:

1. The follow ing Attachments are added:

A. AT_ 9 Implementation of the Section 889(a)(1)(B) Prohibition on Contracting w ith Entities Using Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

B. AT_10 (889(a)(1)(B) Requirements for Contracting Officers Summation.

C. AT_11 Site Visit Change Document (changed to Teleconference).

2. AT 7 is updated and attached.

3. TE 7 is updated and attached.

4. Section J List of documents, exhibits and other attachments is updated.

5. Section M ADDENDUM 52.212.-2 is updated to reflect site visit via teleconference. See AT_11.

All other aspect of this solicitation remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 29-Jul-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911RX20R0003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

20-Jul-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

29-Jul-2020

CODE

MICC - FORT RILEY

1792 12TH STREET

FORT RILEY KS 66442

W911RX 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911RX20R0003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Attachment/Exhibit Title Date

Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (Section C)

8 July 2020

Attachment 2

SCA Wage Determination No. 2015-5343 Rev No. 13 3 June 2020

Attachment 3 Sample of RRF 26 March 2020 Attachment 4 CLS 26 March 2020 Attachment 5 Deliverables 7 July 2020 Attachment 6 Performance Requirement Summary 7 July 2020 Attachment 7 Bid Schedule 24 June 2020 Attachment8 Past Performance Questionaire - Attachment 9 Implementation of the Section

889(a)(1)(B) Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Using Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

28 July 2020

Attachment 10 (889(a)(1)(B) Requirements for Contracting Officers Summation.

28 July 2020

Attachment 11 Site Visit Change Document (changed to Teleconference).

28 July 2020

TE-1 Location Maps 26 March 2020 TE-6 Floor Plan Drawing 26 March 2020 TE-7 Job orders 24 June 2020

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM FAR 52.212-2

The clause at FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition and is amended as follows.

(e) Basis for Contract Award: The basis of which this contract will be awarded will be price, technical capability, and past performance in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Parts 12 and FAR 13 procedures.

By submission of this offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications.

The contract resulting from this RFQ will be awarded to that responsible offeror (in accordance with FAR 9.104) whose offer, conforms to the RFQ, and is determined to provide the best value to the Government, which may not be the quote/proposal offering the lowest price. The award will be based on the combined evaluations of technical capability, past performance and price. Technical capability will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis; only offerors rated as “Acceptable” in all four elements of their technical proposal will be considered for award. Past Performance and price will be subject to the best value trade-off process; with past performance being more important than price. The importance of price as an evaluation factor will increase with the degree of equality of the quotes in relation to the non-price factors. When technically acceptable offerors are considered essentially equal in terms of past performance, or when price is so significantly high as to diminish the value of past performance info to the Government, price may become the determining factor for award. The trade-off process is described below:

a. If one technically acceptable offeror is better in terms of past performance and has the lowest price, that offeror may be considered to be the best value.

b. If one technically acceptable offeror is better in terms of past performance, but does not have the lowest price, the Government will evaluate whether the differences in the non-price factor is worth the differences in price. If the differences are considered to be worth the differences in price, the offeror with the higher price may be considered the better value.

The evaluation process will include the following:

(1) Price Evaluation: Custodial Service Cost Coefficient (multiplier) for the custodial service tasks unit prices on the Pre-priced Custodial Service Unit Price Schedule and the Total Cost per month for each building. The coefficient shall be represented as "net" (e.g., 1.0), a "decrease from" (e.g., 0.95), or an "increase to" (e.g., 1.05) the custodial service task unit prices and building prices. The Government will use the coefficient to determine the total unit price of each custodial service task on the Pre-priced Custodial Service Unit Price Schedule and the Total Price per month for each building. Custodial Service Cost Coefficient shall be all inclusive and include, but not be limited to, the following costs: Initially, government will rank all offers by the coefficients’’ lowest to highest according to price, including all option period prices. The price evaluation will document the fairness and reasonableness of the coefficients’. The government reserves the right to perform price realism analysis.

NOTE: The contract will include FAR Clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, with the potential to extend the contract an additional six (6) months beyond the awarded contract performance period. In the event the Government requires continued performance, the Government's evaluation of prices proposed for the base and all option periods will suffice to be the Government's evaluation of prices under the extension of services (ref. 52.217-8). Evaluating the Option Period CLINs or the six month Extension of Services Option does not obligate the government to exercise the Options.

(2) Technical Capability. The Government will evaluate technical proposals on a Pass/fail basis and assign an Acceptable or Unacceptable rating as described in Table 1 to each element of the four elements. An overall technical capability rating will not be assigned.

Table 1. Technical Ratings

Rating Description Acceptable

Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable

Proposal does not meets the requirements of the solicitation.

ELEMENT 1 – Management Approach and Staffing. This element is met when the offeror provides a Management and Staffing approach that demonstrates that the Offeror has properly qualified personnel to perform this requirement, has a very sound recruiting and retention plan to ensure the continued availability of properly qualified personnel and has a very efficient, effective and sound staffing approach that ensures an appropriate number of personnel are available to perform this requirement.

ELEMENT 2 - Quality Control Plan (QCP). This element is met when the offeror provides a Quality Control Plan that demonstrates a sound quality control system, which includes identification of responsible personnel, inspection of services provided, deficiency prevention/ correction, and outlines an effective system for control and accountability of keys to prevent unauthorized use.

ELEMENT 3 – Scheduling Approach. This element is met when the offeror demonstrates an effective method of scheduling work to be performed and the sample work schedule submitted by the offeror demonstrates a realistic and clear understanding of the work to be performed.

ELEMENT 4 Equipment & Supplies. This element is met when the offeror demonstrates an ability to sufficiently maintain an adequate quantity of equipment and supplies to perform the requirements of this contract.

A rating of Acceptable/Unacceptable will be assigned to each element. If an offeror receives an unacceptable rating in one or more elements, the offeror will not be considered for award.

(3) Past Performance Evaluation: The government will evaluate recent and relevant performance information on the lowest priced evaluated offeror based on: (1) Part IV - Past Performance Information provided by the offeror; (2) Any past performance information obtained from the Performance Questionnaires (Attachment 8); and (3) Any data independently obtained by the government and/or commercial sources.

The past performance evaluation will take into account past performance information from the principle offeror, as well as, previous contract's key personnel and subcontractors that will perform major aspects of the requirement. The past performance on the predecessors company's key personnel and subcontractors that will perform major aspects of the requirement will be rated as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror. The Government will use the following procedures in evaluating past performance:

The offeror's past performance efforts will be assessed for: Recency, Relevancy and Performance Quality. The Government will only evaluate performance quality on past efforts that are determined to be both recent and relevant.

(i) Recency: An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. Recent past performance information includes contracts performed and/or being performed for any customer within the last three (3) years preceding the date of issuance of this solicitation, to include at least six (6) months of documented performance during the three (3) year period.

(ii) Relevancy: Relevant contracts performance effort involved similar scope, magnitude of effort, and complexities to that required by this solicitation. The government will assess relevancy for each contract and assign a rating as described in Table 2 below:

Table 2. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Rating Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/Past performance effort involved essentially the scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity that this solicitation requires. Performance of effort includes Custodial Service for facilities with multiple buildings and greater than 1,000,000 square feet.

Relevant Present/Past performance involved similar scope, magnitude of effort, or complexity that this solicitation requires. Performance of effort includes Custodial Service for facilities with multiple buildings between 800,000 and 1,000,000 square feet.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/Past performance involved some of the scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity that this solicitation requires. Performance of effort includes Custodial Service for facilities with multiple buildings between 500,000 and 800,000 square feet or only one building over 500,000 square feet.

Not Relevant Past performance involved little or none of the scope, magnitude of effort, or complexity that this solicitation requires. Performance of effort includes Custodial Service for facilities less than 500,000 square feet or no Custodial Services.

(iii) Performance Quality: The quality assessment consists of an evaluation of recent and relevant past performance information available, regardless of its source. The quality assessment may reveal positive or adverse past performance information. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comment received from sources without a formal rating system. For each of the recent and relevant past performance information reviewed, the performance quality of work will be assessed based on the: (1) Quality Assessment Criteria evaluated under Section 4 of the PPQ (Attachment _8_, (2) the evaluation ratings in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), if available and (3) Past Performance information obtained from other sources available to the Government.

The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to assess the degree of confidence the Government has in the offeror's ability to meet the solicitation requirements based on the offeror's demonstrated record of performance. The assessment process will result in an offeror's overall performance confidence assessment rating of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, or Neutral Confidence.

Offerors with no recent past or present performance history or the offeror's performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned will receive the rating "Neutral Confidence," meaning the offeror is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably (neutral). As a result of the relevancy and performance quality assessments, offerors will receive an integrated past performance confidence assessment rating as described in Table 3 below:

Table 2. Past Performance Confidence Ratings Rating Rating Definition

Substantial Confidence

Based on the offeror's quality/recent/relevant performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the offeror's quality/recent/relevant performance record, the government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence

No recent/relevant performance is available or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence

Based on the offeror's quality/recent/relevant performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror's quality/recent/relevant performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

****Note: In evaluating past performance, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation.****

E. IAW FAR 52.237-1, Offerors are urged and expected to inspect the site where services are to be performed and to satisfy themselves regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the cost of contract performance, to the extent that the information is reasonably obtainable. In no event shall failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for a claim after contract award. The Government will hold a site visit for this requirement on 10:00AMCST, Monday, 3 August, 2020 via Teleconference. Please see Attachment_11 for instructions or contact the contract specialists, Ms. Selvena Carter (selvena.b.carter.civ@mail.mil) or Contracting Officer Ronald Kabat (ronald.l.kabat.civ@mail.mil) for further information.

F. All questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted in writing after the site visit conference to the Contract Specialists, Ms. Selvena Carter (selvena.b.carter.civ@mail.mil) or Contracting Officer, Ronald Kabat (ronald.l.kabat.civ@mail.mil) no later than Friday, 13 August 2020 1:00 pm Central Standard Time (CST). The questions and answers will then be combined and provided to all via an amendment to the solicitation.

G. Contractor in-person visits to survey the site shall be requested and scheduled by emailing selvena.b.carter.civ@mail.mil. In-person visits shall be completed NLT 12 August 2020.

(End of Summary of Changes)