Attachment 0002 Developmental Contractor Format TDP.pdf
PDF 338 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GVSC Technical and Engineering Services (continuation of W56HZV_GVSC_TES) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W56HZV_GVSC_TES2
About this file
This attachment provides the developmental contractor format for technical data packages (TDPs) required under the solicitation. The TDPs must describe physical and functional characteristics to enable development, manufacturing, and testing. Data deliverables include parametric 3D CAD models with associated 2D drawings in PDF or Excel formats. Models must incorporate defined metadata attributes and pass geometric validation property checks. Drawings and lists must match models and include distribution statements, export control warnings, and data rights markings. TDPs shall comply with standards including ASME Y14.1, Y14.5, Y14.24, and follow the specified format using Pro/Engineer CAD software. Completed TDPs are due by the response date of April 26, 2022 to support the Department of Defense Combat Capabilities Development Command Ground Vehicle Systems Center technical and engineering services contract for fiscal years 2023 through 2028.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved For Public Release: Distribution Unlimited
RFP: W56HZV-22-R-0003
Attachment 0002 - Developmental Contractor Format TDP
UNCLASSIFIED
Developmental Contractor Format Technical Data Package (TDP)
Technical Data Package (TDP) Requirements
Developmental design data shall describe the physical and functional characteristics to meet specified requirements in contract and enable the development, manufacture and testing.
TDP shall conform to the requirements in the TDP Option Selection Worksheet and Tailoring Checklist in this attachment.
Item Identification Traceability
The Contractor shall prepare the technical data so all applicable product definition documents and part identifying numbers (PIN), i.e. associated lists, test criteria, program-unique and process specifications, standard parts, etc., are referenced (top to lowest part item level) within the TDP for traceability.
Indentured Bill of Material (IBOM)
The contractor shall submit an IBOM to accompany and reflect each TDP delivered sequenced down to the lowest purchasable component. The contractor shall utilize the OEM part number and CAGE to identify parts. The contractor shall not re-identify or re-mark supplier or purchased parts or related product data with his own number and CAGE. The contractor shall include at a minimum the IBOM fields in the sample that will be provided at Start of Work Meeting.
TDP Standards and Best Practices
The contractor shall develop the TDP in accordance with latest versions of Department of Defense (DoD) adopted ASME industry standards Y14.1, Y14.5, Y14.24, Y14.34, Y14.35, Y14.38, Y14.100, and MIL-STD-31000. Contractor’s CAD solid modeling software application is acceptable. Government’s preference is PTC’s Pro/Engineer CAD modeling software. Version of CAD modeling software used for CAD data delivery will be agreed upon at the Start Of Work Meeting (SOWM). The contractor shall verify that TDP components open without errors before each delivery. The Government will provide Government CAD Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), Pro/Engineer start part files and Pro/Engineer drawing formats.
TDP Deliverable File Formats
1. Parametric 3D and associated 2D Native CAD Models.
All parts/assemblies’ models (other than for standard hardware) shall be parametric, feature-based, dimensioned and include appropriate tolerances, notes, and metadata attributes.
The 3D and 2D CAD models shall be associative. Any change in either the 3D or 2D shall be automatically updated in the associated files. All Source Control and Vendor Item Control parts shall be modeled with sufficient information.
2. Shrink-wrap Solid Models.
All Military/Industry Standard parts and installation higher assemblies shall be modeled the least for form, fit and function with sufficient envelope, mounting and mating features.
Models shall be sufficient to provide adequate visualization, interface characteristics, and accurate weight and center of gravity. Associated drawings are not required to be generated for standard hardware.
3. 2D PDF.
All 2D CAD drawings shall be exported to PDF with at least 300 dpi resolution
4. Excel spreadsheet.
Each TDP shall be accompanied with the Indentured Bill of Material (IBOM) in excel format.
Legacy Technical Data
Legacy parts/assemblies that are not modified under this contract shall be delivered at the latest release level.
File Naming Convention
Parts and assemblies shall be named using the following convention:
CAGE_Part Number.prt i.e. 23456_23984.prt
Associated PDF files shall have the same filename with extension “.pdf”.
Security Markings
The contractor shall apply the applicable DoD Technical Distribution Statement and Export Control Warning required by DoD Instruction 5230.24 and Directive 5230.25 to all technical data produced or delivered. All statements, notices, and data rights legends shall be applied to all drawings on each sheet, directly above or adjacent to the title block. Associated lists and other related documents that are primarily of a textual nature shall have markings applied to each page. On models, all markings shall be applied to initial layer at opening. There shall be no ‘FOUO’ (For Official Use Only) markings on any technical data.
Data Rights Markings on Tech Data Deliverables
In accordance with the DFARS, the Government has unlimited rights to technical data for Form, Fit, Function, Operation, Maintenance, Installation, and Training (FFFOMIT), regardless of who paid for the development of the item(s). The contractor shall correctly mark and deliver all technical data ordered to include items that are purchased with greater rights from the Contracting Officer-approved Assertions List. FFFOMIT data delivered shall not contain data rights or other contractor imposed restrictive legends. If FFFOMIT data is commingled in a model, drawing, or document, with data that is limited or restricted, the contractor shall mark only the specific portions, sheets, or pages of data subject to the limitation or restriction. The Government will require a distribution statement on all technical data delivered, and, if applicable, an export control warning, in accordance with DODI 5230.24.
Item Unique Identification (IUID) Marking Requirement
All items requiring IUID markings in accordance with DFAR 252.211-7003 (paragraph c) shall incorporate labeling or marking information as part of the TDP in accordance with MIL-STD-130.
Applicable 2D CAD drawings and 3D CAD solid model TDP shall include IUID marking information. The IUID information in drawings, solid models and associated lists shall indicate method of marking or labeling, label or plate material composition, data matrix location and orientation and other applicable information in accordance with MIL-STD-130.
Referenced Documents
The contractor shall furnish all documents referenced in TDP deliverables as required by latest revision of MIL-STD-31000.
Version Control
The contractor shall assign a unique identifier to TDP contents and utilize disciplined version control in managing digital data. Each revision shall be a new master, and the contractor shall retain all approved revisions (versions) of each document and model representation to provide a traceable history in order to access the correct revision when needed. The content of a document and model revision is fixed once approved. The contractor shall insure that all representations (i.e., Adobe PDF, CAD, STEP, etc.) of a single version or revision of data, delivered to the Government for approval and subsequently maintained by the contractor for the term of this contract, are identical.
TDP OPTION SELECTION WORKSHEET
SYSTEM: DATE PREPARED:
A. CONTRACT NO.
B. EXHIBIT/ATTACHMENT NO. C. CLIN D. CDRL DATA
ITEM NO(s). A008
1. TDP Level (X and complete as applicable.)
A. CONCEPTUAL LEVEL
DEVELOPMENTAL LEVEL
PRODUCTION LEVEL
B. REMARKS:
2. TYPE AND FORMAT (X all that apply and complete as applicable.)
A.
TYPE 2D: 2D DRAWINGS
TYPE 3D: 3D MODELS ONLY
TYPE 3D: 3D MODELS WITH
ASSOCIATED 2D DRAWINGS
B.
CAD (SPECIFY TYPE) Contractor’s CAD 3D Modeling Software. Preferred PTC Pro/Engineer.
ISO 10303 STEP FORMAT (Specify STEP PROTOCOL AP203 ed2, AP 214 etc.)
ISO 32000 PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT Adobe Acrobat at minimum 300 dpi
OTHER ELECTRONIC FORMAT (SPECIFY TYPE)
Excel spreadsheet for the IBOM
HARDCOPY:
REMARKS:
3. CAGE CODE AND DOCUMENT
NUMBERS
A. CONTRACTOR CAGE AND DOCUMENT NUMBERS
GOVERNMENT CAGE (COMPLETE 3B & 3C OR 3D)
D. To Be Assigned By:
B. USE CAGE CODE: C. USE DOCUMENT NUMBERS:
4. DRAWING FORMATS (X one and complete as applicable)
CONTRACTOR FORMAT.
GOVERNMENT FORMAT.
REMARKS: Government CAD Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), PTC Pro/E start part files, drawing formats, CAD Parameters list, and IBOM sample will be provided to contractor
5. TDP ELEMENTS REQUIRED (X all that apply )
ELEMENTS REQUIRED TO BE DETERMINED BY CONTRACTOR - OR THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED:
CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS
DEVELOPMENTAL DESIGN DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS
PRODUCT DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS
COMMERCIAL DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS
SPECIAL INSPECTION EQUIPMENT (SIE) DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS
SPECIAL TOOLING (ST) DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS
SPECIFICATIONS
SOFTWARE DOCUMENTATION
SPECIAL PACKAGING INSTRUCTIONS (SPI) DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS
6. ASSOCIATED LIST (X and complete as applicable)
A. PARTS LIST (X ONE) (1) INTEGRAL (2) SEPARATE
B. DATA LISTS (X ONE) (1) NOT REQUIRED (2) REQUIRED (SPECIFY LEVELS OF ASSEMBLY)
C. INDEX LISTS (X ONE) (1) NOT REQUIRED (2) REQUIRED (SPECIFY LEVELS OF ASSEMBLY) D. WIRING LISTS (X ONE) (1) NOT REQUIRED (2) REQUIRED (SPECIFY LEVELS OF ASSEMBLY) E. INDENTURED DATA LISTS (X ONE) (1) NOT REQUIRED (2) REQUIRED (SPECIFY LEVELS OF ASSEMBLY) F. APPLICATION LISTS (X ONE) (1) NOT REQUIRED (2) REQUIRED (SPECIFY LEVELS OF ASSEMBLY)
7. APPLICABILITY OF STANDARDS. The following Standards apply: (X as applicable)
ASME Y14.100
ENGINEERING DRAWING PRACTICES
WITH APPENDICES:
B C D E
ASME Y14.24 TYPES AND APPLICATIONS OF
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
ASME Y14.34 ASSOCIATED LIST
ASME Y14.35M REVISION OF ENGINEERING
DRAWINGS AND ASSOCIATED LIST
ASME Y14.41 DIGITAL PRODUCT DEFINITION DATA
PRACTICES
ASME Y14.5 DIMENSIONING AND TOLERANCING
OTHER STANDARDS APPLY AS
DESCRIBED: ASME Y14.1
COMPANY STANDARDS PERMITTED
YES NO
8. OTHER TAILORING (Attach additional sheets as necessary)
Metadata Attributes - All 3D CAD parts and assemblies shall incorporate parameters for Government configuration and data management requirements.
Solid Model Geometric Validation Proprieties (GVP) Checks. Contractor shall conduct geometric validation properties checks on all Government native (fully defined feature based parametric) part and assembly solid models. Disregard manufacturing process models.
The minimum 3-D Component Geometry, Assembly Construction, Validation Checks are:
3-D Component Geometry
1) Each model must contain only 1 solid.
2) Models are single part files consisting of modeling entities and attributes.
3) Models contain drafting entities necessary to present geometrical dimensioning and tolerancing information.
4) Models are generated for every part number that is production intent, production related, or to be prototyped.
5) No reference geometry models reside within the model.
6) Models contain no surface data (non-commercial components).
7) Parameters (attributes) are present and contain acceptable values.
8) Models contain proper density
9) Layers contain correct objects.
10) Models contain coordinate system.
11) Models that are positioned in more than one location on the vehicle end-item shall be designated at the absolute coordinated system and located in the vehicle end-item position in the assembly. All other models shall be designated in this vehicle position.
12) Models are saved in an isometric view.
13) Models and views not used are deleted.
14) All corner and fillet radii are modeled
15) All unnecessary wireframes are deleted.
16) Models passed all native CAD system (design software) solid model validation checks.
17) Models passed all interference checks (bolt/nut and gasket is ok).
18) Models contain no tiny objects or tiny edges.
19) Modeling tolerances applied in accordance with Contractor’s geometry and CAD creation standard. A default tolerance value shall be indicated in standard.
20) Model does not have any unnecessary parent/child relationships.
3-D Assembly Construction
21) Assembly contains CSYS/WCS displayed in absolute zero (x=0, y=0, z=0).
22) Assembly in body position.
23) Assembly can contain standard parts; however, standard parts must be UNMODIFIED from original.
24) Assembly is fully constrained.
3-D Component and Assembly in Explicit Non-Parametric Merged Solid Shrink-Wrap Format
25) Part and assemblies in merged solid format.
26) Complete with sufficient envelope.
27) Accurate mounting and mating dimensions (interfaces to Government baseline configuration items).
28) Body position in accordance with absolute coordinate system.
29) Includes applicable interface characteristics.
30) Current mass proprieties, weight, center of gravity and inertia information.
31) Incorporation of user-defined TDP metadata attributes.
32) Quality level at highest reasonable selection.
33) Skeletons, quilts, and small surfaces removed.
34) Real colors not gray-neutral colors presented.
ASME Y14.100 TAILORING CHECKLIST – SHEET 1
A. Drawing Media (Choose all that apply)
(1) Non-digital (Specify )
(2) Digital Data (3D Native, 2D neutral CAD Adobe PDF, Word, etc.)
(3) Other (Specify )
B. Drawing Format (Choose One)
(1) Contractor
(2) Government (forms supplied by the Government)
(3) Government (forms supplied by the Contractor)
C. Drawing Sheet Size and Format (Choose One)
(1) ASME Y14.1
(2) ASME Y14.1M
D. Application Data (Choose all that apply)
(1) Contractor option
(2) Required
(a) On drawing
(b) By reference (Specify )
(c) Contractor option
(3) General use or multi-use notations
(a) allowed
(b) not allowed
E. Drawing Detail (ASME Y14.24) (Choose all that apply)
(1) Monodetail
(2) Multidetail
(3) Tabulated
F. Dimensioning and Tolerancing (Choose all that apply)
(1) Metric
(2) Decimal-inch
(3) Application of ASME Y14.5M
(a) Specific issue (revision) required (Specify issue )
(b) Issue in effect ( IAW latest ASME Y14.5 )
G. Drawing Notes (Choose One)
(1) On drawing
(2) By reference (Specify )
(3) Contractors option
H. Types of Drawings (ASME Y14.24) (both, as needed)
(1) Contractor selects (as needed)
(2) Government selects (as needed)
ASME Y14.100 TAILORING CHECKLIST – SHEET 2
I. Maintenance of Multi-Sheet Drawings (ASME Y14.35M) (Choose all that apply)
(1) Drawing revision level (DOD preferred)
(2) All sheets same revision level
(3) Sheet revision level
J. Redrawn Drawings (redrawing without change) (ASME Y14.35M ) (Choose one)
(1) Advance revision level
(2) Revision level is not advanced
K. Maintenance of Revision History (Choose all that apply)
(2) Optional methods
(a) Remove one or more revision record as required
(b) Remove all previous revision history
(c) Remove all revision history but retain line entry for revision authorization and date of revision
(d) Remove all except revision preceding current
(e) Maintain revision history in its entirety
L. Adding Sheets (ASME Y14.35M) (Choose all that apply)
(2) Optional methods
(a) Renumber sheets using consecutive whole numbers
(b) Number added sheets in decimal-number sequence
(c) Number added sheets in alpha-numeric sequence
M. Deleting Sheets (ASME Y14.35M) (Choose all that apply)
(2) Optional methods
(a) Renumber all affected remaining sheets
(b) Affected remaining sheets not renumbered (revision status of sheets block is updated with notations such as CANC or DEL)
N. Markings on Engineering Drawings (Choose one)
(1) Special items and processes apply
(a) Applicable symbols (IAW latest ASME Y14.100)
(b) Applicable special notes (Specify )
(2) Special items and processes do not apply
O. Associated Lists (ASME Y14.34M) (Choose all that apply)
(1) Non-digital (Specify )
(2) Digital Data (Native CAD Models, Drawings, and PDF)
(3) Other (Specify )
ASME Y14.100 TAILORING CHECKLIST – SHEET 3
P. Types of Associated Lists (ASME Y14.34M) (Choose all that apply)
(1) Parts Lists
(a) Integral
(b) Separate
(c) Contractors option
(2) Application List (on drawing)
(3) Data Lists
(4) Index Lists
(5) Indentured Data List
(6) Wire List (as needed)
(7) Other (Specify )
Q. Angle of Projection (ASME Y14.3M) (Choose one)
(1) 3rd Angle
(2) 1st Angle
R. Language (Choose one )
(1) English required
(2) Other (Specify )
S. Applicability of Appendices
(1) Appendix B
(a) as detailed herein
(b) as modified
(2) Appendix C
(a) as detailed herein
(b) as modified
(3) Appendix D
(a) as detailed herein
(b) as modified
(4) Appendix E
(a) as detailed herein
(b) as modified
US ARMY - TACOM/TARDEC
CAD MODEL AND DRAWING VALIDATION CHECKLIST
Do the PDF drawings match CAD 2D drawings?
Are the parts/assemblies fully constrained?
Are dimensions on drawings sourced from models? Are drawings free of Cosmetic Dimensions? Are dimensions mostly driving dimensions?
Are Parameters in models correct?
Are Notes, Markings, Title blocks, and Revision blocks sourced from models?
Are the model tree (in model) and parts lists (in drawings) the same?
Did the CAD models pass geometric integrity checks?
Are NHA and Used-On properly populated on drawings?
Do Notes include…
"APPLICABLE STANDARDS/SPECIFICATIONS:
A. ASME Y14.100-2013
B. ASME Y14.5M-2009" (when applicable)" Is Distribution statement accurate and complete?
Is Export Control statement accurate?
Is ‘Destruction Statement’ accurate and complete?
Are accurate 'data rights' included with appropriate legends per DFARS?
Is Title Block consistent with standards? Is Title Block complete?
Is Revision block complete?
Do specs and stds listed exist? Are spec part numbers structured properly?
Is the IBOM consistent with Parts lists?
Are weldments' notes applied correctly?
Are GD&T markings correct?
Are assigned part numbers correct? Are sub-assemblies and sub-parts using correct Government and commercial numbers?
Are Vendor Item Control (VIC) and Source Control (SC) drawings accurate? Did contractor receive approval for SC drawings? Are the drawing formats correct?
Are the Material and SPEC callouts correct?
Is the design accurate and complete?
Can it be produced by a third party from the TDP developed?
Do drawings contain inspection and acceptance criteria?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .