W52P1J19R0032-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

0001 2020AUG10

W52P1J

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - RI

ROCK ISLAND, IL 61299-8000

BLDGS 60 & 62

NATHANIAL S. TUTOR

EMAIL: NATHANIAL.S.TUTOR.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W52P1J-19-R-0032

2020JUL06

X

X 2020SEP08 06:00pm

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 14

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: NATHANIAL S. TUTOR

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCRI-AR/(309)782-4972

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Supply Contracts and Priced Orders

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

1. The purpose of Amendment 0001 to Solicitation W52P1J-19-R-0032 is to:

a. Extend the closing date from 07 SEPTEMBER 2020 to 08 SEPTEMBER 2020.

b. Update Section A, Paragraph 9, of the Solicitation to provide clarification.

c. Correct Section M, Paragraph C.4.b.i., to refer to Attachment 0009 instead of Attachment 0010.

d. Update Attachments 0009, 0023, 0024, and 0025.

e. Provide answers to the following questions that were submitted in response to the Solicitation:

Q1: In regards to the following TDPLs please provide clarification, and TDPL information contains a statement *** THIS TDPL HAS NOT BEEN

VALIDATED ***:

Attachment 0025 Fuze, Smoke Pot, M208, NSN: 1365-01-564-8799 and PRON ID: 4I9A09O2M2 12: Revision changes when compared to the Pre-

Solicitation TDPL release. Many revisions are changing to a previous REV level.

Attachment 0024 Fuze, Hand Grenade M201A1, NSN: 1330-00-293-9516 and PRON ID: 4I9A09O1M2 20: Revision changes when compared to the Pre-

Solicitation TDPL release. Many revisions are changing to a previous REV level.

Attachment 0023 Fuze, Hand Grenade M201A1 MOD 3, NSN: 1330-01-603-9230 and PRON ID: 4I9A09O0M2: TDPL appears incomplete as no product / packaging drawings, specifications and standards information are included.

A1: Attachment 0023 M201A1 MOD 3, NSN: 1330-01-603-9230, Attachment 0024 M201A1, NSN: 1330-00-293-9516, and Attachment 0025 M208, NSN:

1365-01-564-8799 have been updated in Section J and at https://beta.sam.gov to correct all issues above.

Q2: Is the actual Solicitation due date September 7th since this is the Labor Day Holiday?

A2: Closing date is extended to 08 SEPTEMBER 2020 due to 07 SEPTEMBER 2020 being a holiday.

Q3: Since the CDRLs are not priced separately, are we required to complete Blocks 17 & 18 on the CDRLs? If so, some of the CDRLs do not have Blocks 17 & 18.

A3: Blocks 17 and 18 should not be filled in since CDRLs are Not Separately Priced.

Q4: Section L 9, states electronic mail proposal submissions shall not exceed a size limit of 10MB. Is this the limit per email or for the total proposal? Will a DoD Safe Link be provided for our submittal of the proposal?

A4: Each email shall not exceed 10MB. Offeror may submit multiple emails to submit its proposal. A DoD Safe Link will not be provided to offerors since Section L of the solicitation requires electronic mail proposals.

Q5: Are pages such as the title page, table of contents, compliance matrix, list of acronyms, etc. excluded in the page count in the

Technical Approach Factor, as they are in the Past Performance Factor?

A5: Section L only states the IMS and Process Flow Diagrams will not count towards the page limit for the Technical Approach Factor. If not listed as excluded in Section L for each Factor then those pages shall be counted within the page limit. Each Volume for each Factor has the pages listed that will not be included in the page count.

Q6: Is the font in graphics (e.g., illustrations, charts, diagrams, tables, etc.) allowed to be smaller than 12 point?

A6: Section L only requires Arial or Times New Roman, with a minimum font size of 12 point within the proposal. Graphics (e.g., illustrations, charts, diagrams, tables, etc.) font size will be up to the offeror. However, it is encouraged that these fonts within graphics (e.g., illustrations, charts, diagrams, tables, etc.) be readable.

2 14

W52P1J-19-R-0032

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Q7: Since the Process Flow Diagrams are not included in the page count, is there a page limit for each Process Flow Diagram?

A7: Section L does not state any page limit for the Process Flow Diagram, therefore there is no page limit.

Q8: Are we required to submit CDRLs for all items ACA or are they only submitted after the delivery order for that item?

A8: CDRLs for all items listed are required after contract award within the timeframe listed on each item's CDRL.

Q9: Section A.5., Page 3: The U.S. Armys approach for cumulative price is unclear to us. If the US Army were to make two or more awards in the same ordering period for the same CLIN, which unit prices are used for each of these orders? Will the U.S. Army provide an example of such a scenario?

A9: For Example Use Only:

Widget Ordering Period 1

Quantity Ranges / Unit Price

1 - 50 $7.00

51 - 100 $6.50

101 - 150 $5.50

The Government places initial order for 25 Widgets at $7.00 each. A few months later, the Government places an order for an additional

50 Widgets. Since 25 Widgets (1st Order) plus 50 Widgets (2nd Order) equals 75 Widgets, this falls in the Quantity Range of 51 100, so the unit price for the new order of 50 Widgets is $6.50. Then, the Government places a third order during Ordering Period 1 for 50

Widgets, which now brings the total Widgets ordered during Ordering Period 1 to 125 Widgets, which is in the Quantity Range of 101 -150, so the unit price for the new order of 50 Widgets is $5.50.

For the purposes of cumulative pricing, quantities will "reset" at the beginning of each Ordering Period. Note that if the Government places an order within one Ordering Period, but deliveries will not occur until a subsequent Ordering Period, quantity ranges and prices from the Ordering Period in which the order occured will be used.

Q10: Section A.9, page 111-112: This section states the Small Business Subcontracting Plan is to encompass the maximum range for each

Ordering Period. Does this mean we should use the maximum quantity within the highest range for both the Small Business Subcontracting

Plan and the Small Business Participation Plan?

A10: Section A Paragraph 9, and Attachment 0009, have been updated to clarify what is to be used for the Small Business Participation

Plan and the Small Business Subcontracting Plan.

Q11: Section L, subsection A.9 It is understood that the proposal response is to be submitted via email to both the PCO and her representative. It is also understood that email limitations restrict the file size attachment to be no larger than 10MB. If a bidder has a response that exceeds the 10MB limit, may we submit multiple emails, each not exceeding 10MB, titled similar to Email 1 of X, Email 2 of X, Email 3 of X, etc? As an 2/2 alternative, would the US Army provide a secured site to upload proposal response files?

A11: If an offeror response exceeds 10MB the offeror may submit multiple emails each not exceeding 10MB to submit its proposal.

Q12: L.B.1.b. & c., Volume 1 Content, page 100 & 101 These Section L instructions state that both the IMS and Process Flow Diagrams shall be no larger than 11 x 17 printed. For both the IMS and Process Flow Diagrams, can you clarify if we have one printed page or multiple printed pages for the IMS and each Process Flow Diagram? One page each will limit our proposal to very-high summary level IMS and

Process Flow Diagrams.

A12: The IMS and Process Flow Diagrams can be multiple pages as long as each page is no larger than 11 x 17 printed.

Q13: With Holston AAP being the only US source for Comp B, who will not commit to outyear Firm Fixed Pricing, will the Government consider an Economic Price Adjustment clause for this High Explosive?

A13: The Government will not consider an Economic Price Adjustment clause at this time.

Q14: MIL-DTL-32581 paragraph 4.3.3.11 has minor characteristics m201, m202 and m202.

Will the USG be revising this to m201, m202 and m203?

A14: An Engineering Change Proposal is being processed to correct this error.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0002 ***

3 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SOLICITATION NUMBER

W52P1J-19-R-0032

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)

Code - 332993 Ammunition (Except Small Arms) Manufacturing

1. This Request for Proposal (RFP) is for the following items:

ITEM: GRENADE, HAND, FRAGMENTATION DELAY M67 (M67 FHG)

NSN: 1330-01-563-0592

P/N: 13021985

DODIC: G881

ITEM: FUZE, HAND GRENADE, PRACTICE, M228 (M228 Fuze)

NSN: 1330-01-567-6575

P/N: 13023630

DODIC: G878

ITEM: FUZE, HAND GRENADE, M213 (M213 Fuze)

NSN: 1330-01-591-8976 (M213 Fuze with confidence clip)

P/N: 13026120

DODIC: G877

ITEM: FUZE, HAND GRENADE, M201A1 (M201A1 Fuze)

NSN: 1330-00-293-9516

P/N: D13-10-82

DODIC: G874

ITEM: FUZE, HAND GRENADE, M201A1 MOD3 (M201A1 MOD3 Fuze)

NSN: 1330-01-603-9230

P/N: 13-10-82

DODIC: GG35

ITEM: FUZE, SMOKE POT, M208 (M208 Fuze)

NSN: 1365-01-564-8799

P/N: 13018178

DODIC: K885

ITEM: GRENADE, HAND, OFFENSIVE, XM111 (XM111 OHG)

NSN: 1330-01-648-9824

P/N: 13060862

DODIC: GG37

ITEM: GRENADE, HAND, BODY, PRACTICE, OFFENSIVE, XM112 (XM112 POHG)

NSN: 1330-01-651-4358

P/N: 13059163

DODIC: GG38

ITEM: PACKAGING SETS - M67 FHG and XM111 OHG

ITEM: INERT CUTAWAY DISPLAYS - M67 FHG and the XM111 OHG

ITEMS: WHOLE INERT MODELS/DISPLAYS - M67 FHG, M213 Fuze, M228 Fuze, M208 Fuze, M201A1 Fuze, M201A1 MOD3 Fuze XM111 OHG, XM112 POHG

2. This RFP is restricted to competition within the United States (U.S.), its outlying areas, and Canada as authorized by 10 U.S.C.

2304(c)(3), implemented by Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 6.302-3. Additionally, offerors are cautioned that these items must be manufactured within the U.S., it outlying areas, or Canada (see Section C, Restriction of Critical Items and Components). The applicable

NAICS code is 332993, Ammunition (Except Small Arms) Manufacturing; with a small business size standard of 1,500 employees.

3. The U.S. Government intends to award two Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) contracts as a result of this RFP. The contract(s) will consist of five one-year ordering periods, which the U.S. Government expects to satisfy its requirements through Fiscal Year 2025. The following five ordering periods are:

Ordering Period 1: Date of Contract Award through 365 Days after Award

Ordering Period 2: 366 Days after Contract Award through 730 Days after Award

4 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Ordering Period 3: 731 Days after Contract Award through 1,095 Days after Award

Ordering Period 4: 1,096 Days after Contract Award through 1,460 Days after Award

Ordering Period 5: 1,461 Days after Contract Award through 1,826 Days after Award

The exact dates representing the five ordering periods will be entered upon contract award.

4. The guaranteed minimum purchase will consist of $2,500,000.00 for the M67 FHG and $1,500,000.00 for the M228 Fuze with a 60/40 percent split of the guaranteed minimum purchase amount in the initial delivery order between the two awardees. The first Delivery

Order(s) will be issued with the basic ID/IQ contract award(s) and will obligate the guaranteed minimum dollar amount. The Government is under no obligation to order more than the guaranteed minimum dollar amount under this ID/IQ contract. The only individual authorized to issue Delivery Orders against this contract is the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO).

5. The resulting contract(s) from this RFP will utilize total (cumulative) pricing for the entire ordering period for production

Contract Line Item Number (CLIN)s. The cumulative quantity unit pricing will be reflected forward. Unit prices of previously awarded quantities will not be adjusted. The awardee is not obligated to honor orders in one ordering period totaling more than the following for each item:

(a) M67 - 600,000 ea.

(b) M228 - 1,500,000 ea.

(c) M213 - 250,000 ea.

(d) M201A1 - 700,000 ea.

(e) M201A1 MOD3 - 75,000 ea.

(f) M208 - 30,000 ea.

(g) XM111 - 600,000 ea.

(h) XM112 - 175,000 ea.

***See FAR 52.216-19 Order Limitations in Section I of this RFP***

6. The maximum quantity (cumulative for both contracts) for each item for all five ordering periods is as follows:

(a) M67 - 3,000,000 ea.

(b) M228 - 5,300,000 ea.

(c) M213 - 375,000 ea.

(d) M201A1 - 1,100,000 ea.

(e) M201A1 MOD3 - 375,000 ea.

(f) M208 - 150,000 ea.

(g) XM111 - 1,550,000 ea.

(h) XM112 - 585,000 ea.

7. The Government will evaluate proposals using Best Value, Trade-Off procedures. The Government intends to make a 60/40 percent split of the guaranteed minimum dollar amount in the first Delivery Orders between the two awardees. The Government reserves the right to adjust each of the Delivery Order quantities by plus or minus 10%. If the Government makes a 60/40 percent split of the guaranteed minimum dollar amount in the first Delivery Orders, the higher percentage of the guaranteed minimum dollar amount may be awarded to the best overall value Offeror; and the lower percentage may be awarded to the second best value Offeror. If the Government orders more than the guaranteed minimum dollar amount under the ID/IQ contracts for any amount to be awarded following the initial award, each awardee will be given a fair opportunity to compete in accordance with FAR 16.505(b) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement

(DFARS) 216.505(2)(b)(2). However, the Government reserves the right to make a 100% award to one Offeror, if determined to be in the

Government's best interest.

8. Offerors' proposals shall include prices for all items, quantity ranges, and First Article Tests (FAT) for all Ordering Periods. All prices shall be entered by the Offerors on the Price Matrix (Attachment 0001) in accordance with Section L. Offerors shall not assume

FAT will be waived and must provide FAT prices as required to be considered for award.

9. Each Other than Small Business Offeror shall submit a single Small Business Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR 19.7 (FAR

Clause 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan). The Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be reviewed when the apparent awardee is determined. In accordance with AFARS Appendix DD, the Small Business Subcontracting Plan must correlate with the percentages of small business utilization identified in the contractor's Small Business Participation Plan in order to be eligible for award. NOTE the Small

Business Participation Plan uses the Total Evaluated Price from the Price Evaluation Matrix as the Total Contract Value. For Offerors utilizing a Commercial Subcontracting Plan the Offeror shall also provide an explanation showing how the percentages of small business utilization identified in the contractor's Small Business Participation Plan correlate to the goals in its Commercial Subcontracting

Plan in order to be eligible for award.

10. The Government anticipates price competition; therefore, cost or pricing data is not required to be submitted with the Offeror's initial proposal. However, the Government reserves the right to require certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-4

5 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Requiring Certified Cost or Pricing Data.

11. This RFP will utilize the Acquisition Source Selection Interactive Support Tool (ASSIST) during the source selection evaluation process. A separate tool, the ASSIST2Industry, will be used in conjunction with ASSIST to accomplish all exchanges, if applicable, with

Offerors after receipt of proposals pursuant to FAR 15.306. ASSIST2Industry provides the ability for the Government to issue, and the

Offerors to receive and respond to, all Evaluation Notices (EN) in a secure online environment. Please see Attachment 0003 - ASSIST

Instructions for further information.

12. Award will be based upon a Best Value, Trade-Off evaluation in accordance with FAR 15.101-1. The Offeror's Technical Approach, Past

Performance, Price, and Small Business Participation will be evaluated under this RFP. Offerors are cautioned to pay specific attention to Section L, entitled Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors. Offerors should read Section M, entitled Evaluation Factors for Award, in its entirety. Award will be made to the Offerors whose proposals are determined to provide the best value to the

Government based upon Section M criteria; therefore, award may be made to other than the lowest priced Offeror.

13. To be considered for award, Offerors' proposals shall remain valid for 360 days from the closing date of this RFP. Ensure on the

SF33, Page 1, Block 12, the blank is filled in with 360 days.

14. Refer to the Section C, Technical Data Package Information, and Distribution and Destruction of Restricted Technical Data. The

Technical Data Packages (TDP) for the M67 FHG, M228 Fuze, M213 Fuze, M201A1 Fuze, M201A1 MOD3 Fuze, M208 Fuze, XM111 OHG, and XM112 POHG are considered Distribution D, limited to the Department of Defense (DoD) and U.S. DoD contractors only. Distribution Statement on technical documents are in accordance with DoD 5230.24. In order to access the TDPs with distribution other than Distribution A, all firms must be registered in the Joint Certification Program (JCP) at https://www.dlis.dla.mil/jcp/ and have a current valid

Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code.

15. The M67 FHG, M228 Fuze, M213 Fuze, M201A1 Fuze, M201A1 MOD3 Fuze, M208 Fuze, XM111 OHG, and XM112 POHG are considered to be sensitive ammunition/explosives. In accordance with Paragraph C of DFARS clause 252.223-7007, the Statement of Work (SOW) that specifies requirements found in DoD 5100.76M, Appendix 2, is attached to this RFP. Refer to Attachment 0004 entitled "Security Statement of Work

(SOW) Physical Security Standards for DoD Security Risk Category (SRC) Arms, Ammunition and Explosives (AA&E) Contractor-Owned and

Contractor-Operated (COCO) Facilities". Safety and Security Pre-award surveys will also be required for all proposed A&E places of performance.

16. Contractor-initiated early deliveries, defined as deliveries occurring prior to the scheduled month, require written PCO authorization.

17. Offerors shall submit proposed item unit prices on the Price Matrix (Attachment 0001) in lieu of Section B pricing. Offerors shall enter firm-fixed prices for each CLIN (FAT, Production, Inert Cutaway Displays, Whole Inert Models/Displays, and Packaging Sets as applicable), Ordering Period, and Quantity Range on Attachment 0001 Grenade Consolidation Price Matrix. Refer to Section L Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors for proposal preparation instructions and for instructions on completing the Price Matrix. Refer to

Section M Evaluation Factors for Award for how the Government will evaluate proposals submitted against this RFP.

18. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of the proposal. The

Government will not make any assumptions concerning an Offeror's intent, capabilities, facilities, or experience. The Government cautions Offerors to ensure that their proposal is complete including all fill-ins and blanks in the RFP. This includes written approval from the cognizant contracting officer for use of Government facilities and equipment, if applicable.

19. Government Furnished Material (GFM) will be provided for this contract. See Section J Attachment 0007 for a complete list of material to be provided.

20. In accordance with CFR 31 U.S.C. 1352, Offerors shall complete and return Attachment 0008 Disclosure of Lobbying Activities. If not applicable, the Offeror shall mark Attachment 0008 Disclosure of Lobbying Activities with "N/A" and return with the Offeror's proposal.

21. This RFP shall not be discussed with any Government employee except the PCO, Ms. Kristy Tierney, or her representative, Mr.

Nathanial Tutor. Your comments and/or questions should be directed in writing by email to Ms. Tierney at kristy.l.tierney.civ@mail.mil and Mr. Nathanial Tutor at nathaniel.s.tutor.civ@mail.mil. Please indicate the RFP number, W52P1J-19-R-0032, in the subject line of the email correspondence pertaining to this RFP.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0001 ***

6 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION J - LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

List of Number List of Number

Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________

Attachment 0009 SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION 29-JUL-2020 003

Attachment 0023 TDPL M201 MOD 3 19-NOV-2019 010

Attachment 0024 TDPL M201A1 19-NOV-2019 011

Attachment 0025 TDPL M208 19-NOV-2019 009

7 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION: INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS______________________________________________________________________

A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

1. Offerors shall submit proposals in accordance with the information in this section. Offerors shall review all documents contained or referenced in the solicitation for further insight into the areas that your proposal must address. Proposals that do not contain the information requested in the solicitation risk the Government determining the proposal unacceptable.

2. Clarity and completeness are essential and proposals should be clear, consistent, and concise. Offerors must provide information in sufficient detail to allow the Government to make a best value assessment of the Offerors capability to support the solicitation and

Technical Data Package (TDP) requirements. The burden of providing complete and thorough information remains with the Offeror.

3. Offerors shall confine information intended for the Government to consider to the appropriate volume. Offerors shall provide information by addressing each factor/sub-factor in the format and sequence identified in these instructions. Information submitted that is not within the appropriate volume may not be considered. The Government will not assume the duty to search for data or information to cure problems it finds in proposals.

4. The Government will not assume the Offeror possesses any capability, understanding, or commitment not specified in the proposal. The

Government cautions Offerors that merely repeating the technical requirements with stated assertions DOES NOT reflect an understanding of the requirement or substantiate capability to perform. Proposals must provide documentary evidence in support of conclusive statements of how the Offeror will meet contract requirements.

5. The Government intends to award two contracts without discussions; consequently, it is the Offerors responsibility to submit a proposal that conforms to all of the terms and conditions of the solicitation and contains the Offerors best offer. In accordance with

FAR 15.306, when award without discussions is contemplated, Offerors may be given the opportunity to clarify certain aspects of proposals (e.g., the relevance of an Offerors past performance information and adverse past performance information to which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond) or to resolve minor or clerical errors. The Government hereby advises Offerors that adverse past performance information to which the Offeror has not yet had an opportunity to respond (reference FAR 15.306) does not include information obtained from formal rating systems, such as Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) or Federal

Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS).

6. The Government reserves the right to open discussions if deemed necessary. In the event that discussions are necessary, the

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) will establish a competitive range in accordance with FAR 15.306.

7. All proposals shall use the English language. Offerors shall utilize Arial or Times New Roman, with a minimum font size of 12 point.

8. The Offerors proposal shall consist of the following five volumes:

Volume 1 Technical Approach Factor

Volume 2 Past Performance Factor

Volume 3 Price Factor

Volume 4 Small Business Participation Factor

Volume 5 Solicitation and Amendments

9. The complete proposal, as described above, shall be electronically submitted to the PCO and her representative no later than the due date and time specified in the solicitation and any subsequent amendments (if applicable). The Government will not evaluate proposals submitted by mail or hand-carried. Electronic mail proposal submissions shall not exceed a size limit of 10MB. The Government recommends that the Offeror request a Return Receipt or other form of acknowledgment to verify that the Government received the proposal.

Electronic Mail:

kristy.l.tierney.civ@mail.mil nathanial.s.tutor.civ@mail.mil

10. All computer files shall be virus checked prior to submission. The Government may hold Offerors financially liable for damage caused to Government computer systems by any virus introduced during review of these submitted documents.

B. PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS AND CONTENT BY VOLUME:

1. Proposal Volume 1 - Technical Approach Factor: _____________________________________________

a. The Technical Approach Factor consists of the following three sub-factors: _________________________________________________________________________

i. Sub-factor 1: Manufacturing Plan

ii. Sub-factor 2: Quality Assurance Program and Critical Safety Characteristics Plans

8 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

iii. Sub-factor 3: Program Management Plan

b. Volume 1 Instructions: _____________________

The Offeror shall develop its Technical Approach proposal using Microsoft Word or Portable Document Format (.PDF) with a minimum font size of 12 point. It shall consist of a maximum of 120 pages, one Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) (provided as part of the Offerors

Sub-factor 3 Program Management Plan proposal), and a minimum of one but up to the maximum of five Process Flow Diagrams (provided as part of the Offerors Sub- factor 1 Manufacturing Plan proposal). The IMS and Process Flow Diagrams will not count towards the page limit. Offerors are required to submit both the IMS and the Process Flow Diagram(s) in pdf format and each shall be no larger than 11 x

17 printed. This information shall also include major/key subcontractors. Major/key subcontractors are defined as subcontractors/suppliers that will be providing critical hardware or whose subcontract is for more than 20 percent of the total proposed price for each item. Offerors shall number all pages. If an Offeror provides more than the maximum allowance of pages, the Government will not evaluate any pages above 120. If an Offeror does not comply with the submission requirements, the Technical Approach proposal may be rejected and not evaluated. Offerors must submit the Technical Approach proposal by the closing date and time of the solicitation.

c. Volume 1 Content: ________________

Sub-factor 1 - Manufacturing Plan:_________________________________

i. The Offeror shall provide a descriptive, realistic, achievable, and supportable Manufacturing Plan to produce the end items to meet the requirements of the solicitation. This Manufacturing Plan shall include a description of the essential manufacturing facilities, equipment, processes, process controls, control points, and sequence of operations for all major assemblies and subassemblies, to include those of all major/key subcontractors. The Offerors Manufacturing Plan shall indicate which elements are manufactured in-house, subcontracted, or are purchased material/parts. The Offeror shall submit in its Manufacturing Plan proposal a minimum of one but up to the maximum of five Process Flow Diagrams. (The Process Flow Diagrams do not count towards the page limit.) The Offerors Manufacturing

Plan proposal shall include the following:

1) A description of how the proposed manufacturing processes will prevent the formation of critical defects.

2) A description of how to segregate the M213, M228, M201A1, M201A1 Mod 3, and M208 fuzes during production, pack out, and shipping.

3) A description of how moisture contamination will be controlled for all energetic/pyrotechnic materials used in the end items.

4) A description of the process of loading, assembling, and packing out each end item.

5) A description of the following:

a) Fuzing: ______

i) The method of manufacturing the safety pin assembly to meet pull force requirements.

ii) The method of producing each delay composition and any additional mixing, processing or testing steps that are taken to ensure the delay burn rates are consistent.

iii) The method of loading delay compositions.

iv) M213 Fuze. Describe what steps will be implemented to ensure that no loose powder occurs prior to detonator assembly (such as handling, and material transportation).

b) Body: ____

i) M67 Grenade Body. Describe the process for strip embossing.

ii) XM111 Grenade Body. Describe the process for co-molding the brass insert to the plastic body.

c) Load Assemble Pack (LAP): ________________________

i) M67 Grenade. Describe the process for Melt/Pouring the explosive into the M67 grenade body.

ii) XM111 Grenade. Describe the process for pressing the explosive billet.

6) A description of critical equipment/tooling used by the prime and key subcontractors.

7) A description of prime and subcontractor facilities and production capacities and how they will meet the required production

9 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

delivery rates/schedule.

8) A description of how the prime and key subcontractors will be able to meet the maximum delivery schedule.

9) A description of how the proposed manufacturing processes will be able to handle a temporary increase in production rates while delivering a conforming product.

Sub-factor 2 - Quality Assurance Program and Critical Safety Characteristics Plans:__________________________________________________________________________________

i. The Offeror shall provide a detailed Quality Assurance Program Plan and a Critical Safety Characteristics Plan that describes its approach for meeting the requirements of the solicitation. The Offeror shall address the following elements for all end items in its

Quality Assurance Program Plan and Critical Safety Characteristics Plan proposal:

1) A description of the procedures to manage and control the process for Critical Safety Characteristics (both internally and at the subcontractor levels), and identification of Critical Safety Characteristics and associated manufacturing processes/controls to include fabrication, assembly, inspection, and testing.

2) A description of the Quality Management System the Offeror intends to use to include evidence of the systems certification to or compliance with ISO 9001:2015 or equivalent.

3) A description of the process for identifying, analyzing, segregating, and disposition of non-conforming material. Describe the procedures for handling of defective material, rework, and repair.

4) A description of the Quality Assurance Program Plan to manufacture, test, and inspect each end item, to include the in-house processes for incoming inspection, fabrication, assembly, inspection, test, packaging, marking, and shipping of the end items.

5) A description of the process that will be used to flow down all quality requirements to subcontractors and suppliers.

Sub-factor 3 Program Management Plan:_____________________________________

i. The Offeror shall provide in its proposal a Program Management Plan with details describing how the manufacture of the end items will be managed to meet the solicitation requirements. The Offerors Program Management Plan proposal shall include:

1) All management and business processes that the Offeror intends to use to execute the contract, manage subcontractors/suppliers, and control technical, cost, and schedule risk. Details shall include a description of each appropriate system and whether it is already in use or it is a proposed new system; if it is a new system, when it will be available.

2) A description of how the production of the multiple end items will be managed in order to meet the delivery schedule.

3) An IMS that clearly illustrates all activities required to satisfy the indicated delivery schedule for the production quantities of each end item, downtime required in changing over from one item to the next, along with all appropriate supporting events such as test, approval, and key meetings to include key subcontractors and supplier schedules. (The IMS will not count towards the page limit.) An analysis shall also be provided to demonstrate that the proposed schedule is supportable and achievable. The IMS must clearly illustrate the interdependencies of all activities, events, and milestones. The IMS must clearly define the program critical path for the period of performance of this contract and provide a supporting narrative that explains how the critical path will be managed and any unusual program aspects affecting it.

4) A description of the Configuration Management System that will be used during execution of the contract. This shall include a description of how engineering changes and deviations to drawings and specifications are processed, reviewed, and acted upon. The

Configuration Management Organization shall also be described as well as how configuration changes are accomplished and controlled at the subcontractor level.

2. Proposal Volume 2 - Past Performance Factor: ___________________________________________

a. The Past Performance Factor consists of the following two sub-factors: _____________________________________________________________________

i. Sub-factor 1: Quality

ii. Sub-factor 2: On-Time Delivery

b. Volume 2 Instructions: _____________________

i. The Past Performance volume shall consist of a list and description of all recent Government, Commercial, and Foreign Military Sales

(FMS) contracts that are relevant to this solicitation and requirement in which the Offeror performed as either the Prime or a major/key subcontractor.

10 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

ii. The Offeror must submit all contract information (Government, Commercial, and FMS) that meets the definitions for "Recent" and

"Relevant".

iii. The Government defines Recent as 1) occurring within the past three years before the initial closing date of this solicitation, or

2) awarded earlier than three years ago, but for which deliveries occurred or were scheduled to occur within the past three years before the initial closing date of this solicitation. The Government may evaluate any subsequent performance prior to the date of award of this requirement.

iv. It is incumbent upon the Offeror to explain the relevance of the data provided. The Government defines Relevant as a present or past performance effort that involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities would include having previously produced like or similar items which utilized the same or similar manufacturing processes, critical skills, and unique techniques needed to produce the Grenades and Fuzes Consolidated Items in the proposal. The Government reserves the right to determine whether an item is like or similar, and whether the item applies to the current requirements for evaluation purposes. The Government may also consider the degree to which contracts are of a comparable complexity to the proposed effort in determining relevance.

v. It is incumbent upon the Offeror to explain why they consider a proposed subcontractor to be a major/key subcontractor on a relevant requirement. The Government considers an Offeror a major/key subcontractor when the Offeror performed or is performing 20 percent or more of a relevant requirement based on total dollar value OR, performed or is performing major or critical aspects of a relevant requirement.

vi. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information remains with the Offeror. The Government advises

Offerors that while the Government may use independent data to evaluate an Offeror's past performance the Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure problems.

vii. There is 30 page limit for the Offerors Past Performance Factor proposal which does not include volume title pages, table of contents pages, cross-referencing pages, acronym lists, and page dividers (used to separate proposal parts). All pages shall be numbered and utilize a minimum font size of 12 point. The Offeror shall include a Table of Contents page, listing the title and page number for each recent and relevant contract included in the Past Performance Factor volume. In the body of the volume, each recent and relevant contract will consist of a Contract Description and a Performance section, with the Performance section discussing the Quality and On-

Time Delivery sub-factors. Each recent and relevant contract shall begin on a new page to clearly delineate between efforts.

c. Volume 2 Content: ________________

i. Contract Descriptions: _____________________

1) Contractor/Subcontractor company name, place of performance, Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code, and Data Universal

Numbering System (DUNS) Number.

2) Contract Number(s) and if applicable, Delivery Orders.

3) Contract Type (Fixed Price, Cost Reimbursable, etc.).

4) Total awarded contract value and total current contract value.

5) Item Nomenclature, NSN, and Part Number.

6) Description of the contract effort.

7) Description of relevance to this acquisition.

8) Name of Government contracting activity or Commercial firm and address; PCO or Contract Manager name, e-mail address, and telephone numbers.

9) Government's technical representative/Contracting Officer Representative, if applicable, and current e-mail address and telephone numbers.

10) Government contract administration activity and the Administrative Contracting Officer's name, current e-mail address, and telephone numbers (if different from (8) above).

11) State whether any Cure Notices, Show Cause Letters, or Letters of Concern were received (if so, include a description of any corrective actions implemented by the Offeror).

12) State whether the contract was terminated in whole or part, and if so identify the type of termination and reasons for the termination. Offerors shall provide the above required information for all recent and relevant contracts it has had terminated for any

11 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

reason, to include those currently in the process of termination.

13) New corporate entities may submit data on prior contracts involving its officers and employees. However, in addition to the other requirements in this section, the Offeror shall discuss in detail the role performed by such persons in the prior contracts.

ii. Performance: ___________

1) Sub-factor 1 - Quality: Offerors shall provide information on their recent and relevant past performance in the area of Quality to ______________________ address Quality Assurance standards applied to meet technical and quality contractual requirements. Offerors may submit evidence of quality awards and/or quality certifications for consideration. Offerors shall disclose information about previous Requests for

Deviation (RFDs); Request for Variances (RFVs); Request for Waivers (RFWs); if RFDs, RFVs, or RFWs were followed by Engineering Change

Proposals; Product Quality Deficiency Reports; Corrective Action Requests; First Article Test (FAT) or Lot Acceptance Testing (LAT) failures; and/or other product quality deficiencies or production problems. The Offeror shall describe their response to stated quality problem(s) (root cause analysis), resolution of the quality problem(s), corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence, and any resulting process improvements. Where no product quality deficiencies, production problems, testing failures, and/or other product quality problems occurred, the Offeror shall so affirm. The Offeror shall provide results of past product/process improvement initiatives. The Offeror's submission must be clear and concise when describing any deficiencies, corrective actions, and implementation.

2) Sub-factor 2 On-Time Delivery: Offerors shall provide information regarding recent and relevant past performance in the area of _____________________________ timeliness of delivery. The Offeror shall provide the original monthly contract delivery schedule, any revised monthly contract delivery schedules, and actual (or projected) monthly deliveries that occurred for each contract. Please note the information requested is not production or shipping schedules, but contractual delivery schedules. Therefore, the date of Government or customer acceptance of product (DD250 or Wide Area Work Flow Receiving Report acceptance date) represents when actual delivery occurred on the contract. If there were any revisions to the delivery schedule (contract schedule modifications), the Offeror shall provide the reasons for the delivery schedule revision(s), whether the Offeror provided consideration for the schedule revision(s), and corrective actions taken to prevent future delays (if contractor had shared or full responsibility). If there were any late deliveries, the Offeror shall provide reasons why the customer did not revise the delivery schedule and if the Offeror incurred any additional penalties on the contract due to late deliveries. For any early deliveries, the Offeror may provide any known benefits to the customer that resulted from the early deliveries. The Offeror shall also provide information regarding the timeliness of their completion of contractual administrative requirements and milestones, such as Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRL) and Production Progress Reports.

3. Proposal Volume 3 - Price Factor: ________________________________

a) The Price Factor has NO sub-factors.

b) Volume 3 Instructions: The Offeror must provide all required information in accordance with (IAW) the following instructions: _____________________

i. The Offeror shall provide its proposed unit prices for the quantities in the Price Evaluation Matrix - Attachment 0001. All information relating to the proposed price including all required supporting documentation must be included in the section of the proposal designated as the Price Factor Volume. Under no circumstances shall this information and documentation be included elsewhere in the proposal.

ii. FAT prices are required for all five ordering periods. Offerors should not assume FAT will be waived and must provide FAT prices as requested. However, the U.S. Government reserves the right to require or waive FAT throughout the life of the contract. Offerors should price each FAT on the Price Evaluation Matrix to reflect the total price of FATs required for the start of production for a new configuration. All FAT and unit prices proposed will be binding.

iii. Offerors shall propose unit prices for all quantity ranges in each Ordering Period (OP) for each end item. Failure to do so may result in the offer being rejected. The end items are as follows: M67, M228, M213, M201A1, M201A1 MOD3, M208, XM111, and XM112.

iv. Certified Cost or Pricing Data/Data Other than Certified Cost or Pricing Data The Government anticipates receiving competitive proposals and using competition to determine price reasonableness. However, the Government reserves the right to request certified cost or pricing data or data other than certified cost or pricing data necessary to determine price reasonableness if competition is not adequate for that purpose. Certified cost or pricing data and data other than certified cost or pricing data, if required, must be submitted IAW the instructions specified at FAR 15.403-5 and at DFARS 215.371-3.

v. Price Information: Price proposals are assumed to represent the Offerors best efforts, as final proposal revisions may not be requested. Any additional information considered necessary to explain the proposed pricing shall be submitted at the time of proposal submission.

vi. The five OPs for this requirement are as follows:

OP One: Date of contract award to day 365

OP Two: Day 366 to Day 730

12 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

OP Three: Day 731 to Day 1095

OP Four: Day 1096 to Day 1460

OP Five: Day 1461 to Day 1825

vii. Offeror shall complete the Price Evaluation Matrix - Attachment 0001:

1) Offeror is required to fill in all cells highlighted in blue.

2) Offeror shall enter full name, CAGE code, and date in spaces provided on TEP Summary tab.

3) Offeror shall state all prices for this acquisition in current U.S. Dollars. Proposed unit prices are limited to two decimal places.

4) The Price Evaluation Matrix - Attachment 0001 is locked to prevent inadvertent changes. The Offerors shall not add additional information or make any changes to it; doing so may deem an Offeror non-compliant, and its proposal may not be considered for award.

5) Offeror shall enter proposed firm fixed unit prices for all CLINs (CLIN 0001 through CLIN 0028) on the Price Evaluation Matrix tab.

6) CLINs are grouped by end items.

7) Offeror shall not add any other information to the Pricing Evaluation Matrix, nor shall Offerors make any changes to the Price

Evaluation Matrix - Attachment 0001.

8) Failure to complete all required blue cells on the Price Evaluation Matrix - Attachment 0001 may result in Offerors proposal being rejected.

4. Proposal Volume 4 - Small Business Participation Factor: _________________________________________________________

a. Volume 4 Instructions: The Offeror shall demonstrate small business participation by detailing its proposed approach to meet the _____________________ requirements under this factor by addressing the following two areas in its Small Business Participation proposal:

i. Proposed Small Business Participation Plan in performance of the potential contract (applies to both Other Than Small Businesses and

Small Businesses).

ii. Commitment to Small Business:

1) Payment Procedures (applies to both Other Than Small Businesses and Small Businesses).

2) Compliance with Small Business Subcontracting Plans (applies to Other Than Small Businesses only).

b. Volume 4 Contents: _________________

i. Proposed Small Business Participation Plan: __________________________________________

1) The Offeror shall complete the Small Business Participation Plan Attachment 0009 to show maximum practicable opportunities to small businesses to compete on this requirement in accordance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns.

ii. Commitment to Small Business: ____________________________

1. The Offeror shall include a written statement of its established procedures to ensure timely payments to small business subcontractors in accordance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (for those contracts under which it was required within the past three years from the closing date of this…