B08 Attachment 0038 - Ft. Campbell Q&A Responses (18 Jul 23).xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 45 KB Posted
- Attached to
- EAGLE FORT CAMPBELL, KY W519TC-23-R-0022
- Solicitation number
- W519TC-23-R-0022
About this file
This is a solicitation for base operations services at Fort Campbell, Kentucky. The Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Rock Island Arsenal is seeking proposals for maintenance, supply, and transportation services. Key requirements include food service equipment maintenance, ammunition supply point operations, motor pool operations, and personal property processing. Proposals are due by August 31, 2023. Award is expected by January 2024 with a one-year base period and four one-year options. Pricing includes firm-fixed-price and cost-reimbursable elements. The incumbent contractor may have an advantage given their experience with workload details provided as historical references.
View the file
Other files
Show all 49
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W519TC-23-R-0022
| Question # | In Attach 00XX | Question Reference (RFP #, PWS #, etc.) | RFP Text | Question | Answer |
| 1 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 39 L.5.4.1.2 | If the requirements change after contract award, will the Government confirm the Offeror may be entitled to an adjustment to the FFP CLINS associated with Transition-In and PMO given the pricing proposed was based on the requirements in this solicitation? | If the requirement change after contract award, Offerors would be afforded the opportunity to provide updated proposals after award. | |
| 2 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 39 L.5.4.1.2 | With many instances in the solicitation indicating specific proposal elements are "for proposal purposes only", should Offeror's expect that the ODC surrogate plug is also only for proposal purposes only and will be adjusted in contract execution against actual workload and inclusive of Offeror's Indirect rate adders? | Per L.5.4.1.2. It is acknowledged that there may be fluctuations in the Government's requirements during the evaluation period which may lead to increases or decreases in the actual workload after award. Offerors shall be allowed to adjust ODCs based on actual workload during contract execution. | |
| 3 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 41 L.5.4.2.6 | Can the Government provide a list of what items it considers to be authorized ODCs? | All ODCs are evaluated and approved in advance of purchase by the USG. Contractors may not sign lease agreements or recurring service agreements which require ODCs. There are dedicated CLINs for ODCs and items not covered under an ODC are purchased for the contractor by the Government using various methods (GPC, GCSS-A, Fedmall, GSA Advantage, etc.). | |
| 4 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 41 L.5.4.2.6 | Can the Government provide a list of what items it considers to be unauthorized ODCs? | All ODCs are evaluated and approved in advance of purchase by the USG. Contractors may not sign lease agreements or recurring service agreements which require ODCs. There are dedicated CLINs for ODCs and items not covered under an ODC are purchased for the contractor by the Government using various methods (GPC, GCSS-A, Fedmall, GSA Advantage, etc.). | |
| 5 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 42 L.5.4.2.12(a)(4) | The Government indicates that "for proposal preparation purposes only, for the Option Years, the Offeror and its subcontractors shall escalate its proposed Exempt Base Labor Rates, compounded annually, by 2.5%". Please confirm that the successful offeror's will not be restricted and locked into this escalation rate for the life of this Task Order. | L.5.4.2.12(a)(4) For proposal preparation purposes only, for the Option Years, the Offeror and its |
Subcontractor(s) SHALL escalate its proposed Exempt Base Labor Rates, compounded annually, by 2.5% to be filled. The government has not indicated that the successful offerors will be restricted and locked into the 2.5% escalation rate for the life of this task order.
| 6 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 43 L.5.4.2.13 | Can the Government provide clarity to the Sales Volume Data requirement as it seems the intent is to evaluate Indirect Rates to sales volume data. If Offeror's Indirect Rates are approved and validated by DCAA(via FPRA/FPRR), is that sufficient validation of indirect rate applicability? | Yes. If the offer has an FPRA or an FPRR, then the offeror does not need to provide historical and budgetary indirect rate data along with sales volume data. However, if the offeror does not have an FPRA or and FPRR then they would need to provide historical and budgetary indirect rate data (to include the pool and base) along with historical and projected sales volume data. |
| 7 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 41 L.5.4.2.6 | Will Contractor leased vehicles/equipment be reimbursed within the ODC Government Surrogate Plug? | All ODCs are evaluated and approved in advance of purchase by the USG. Contractors may not sign lease agreements or recurring service agreements which require ODCs. There are dedicated CLINs for ODCs and items not covered under an ODC are purchased for the contractor by the Government using various methods (GPC, GCSS-A, Fedmall, GSA Advantage, etc.). |
| 8 | RFP | W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 34 L.5.2.1.1(c)(5)(i) | Will manhours expended by contractor personnel conducting/receiving training (i.e. - SHARP) or receiving COVID testing, be considered direct billable time to the contract, and thus should be accounted for in a productive manyear? | IAW PWS paragraph 1.3.2 The contractor shall provide the appropriate amount of qualified labor and management with required training, skills and experience in order to accomplish the work required under this PWS. The contractor shall not allow any employee that is not certified, trained or licensed for a particular task to perform such work. The contractor, at its own expense shall maintain all qualifications and certifications required to perform the requirements of this PWS. The contractor shall generate a Contractor Employee Information list (CDRL PM-01) utilizing the Government provided PM-01 Format. |
| 9 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 43, L.5.4.2.13(a)(1) | Will the Government please clarify that Offeror's are only required to utilize the SCA attachments provided as part of this solicitation and not the CBA attachments when developing the indirect fringe rates for non-exempt personnel. | Per L.5.4.2.13(a)(1) When proposing Indirect Expense Rates, compliance with the Service Contract Act (SCA) (Attachment 0007, Wage |
Determination) is required.
| 10 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 43 L.5.4.2.13 | Is the subcontractor required to provide the DCAA/DCMA information if they are more than 20% of the total contract value? | Per L.5.4.2.13(a)-Indirect rates allocate indirect costs such as overhead, general & administrative (G&A) expense, and fringe benefit costs. The Offeror shall provide the pool and base costs or FPRAs for all proposed indirect expense rates for itself and all Subcontractor(s) who do not submit a proposal directly to the Government. If a Subcontractor is submitting a Cost/Price proposal directly to the Government, then that Subcontractor shall also provide the pool and base costs for all proposed indirect expense rates. |
| 11 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 41 L.5.4.2.7 | Transition is Firm Fixed price. Please confirm no detail needs to be provided for the proposed transition price? | Confirmed |
| 12 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 43 L.5.4.2.13 | Will the government consider revising the requirement for budgetary and historical indirect rates to be supported by DCMA FPRR and Approved Billing Rates rather than the current requirement? | Yes. If the offer has an FPRA or an FPRR, then the offeror does not need to provide historical and budgetary indirect rate data along with sales volume data. However, if the offeror does not have an FPRA or and FPRR then they would need to provide historical and budgetary indirect rate data (to include the pool and base) along with historical and projected sales volume data. |
| 13 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 43 L.5.4.2.13 | If Offeror's have approved FPRA/FPRR's in place with the Government, will the Government allow Offeror's to reference and provide these packages in lieu of providing the budgetary and historical indirect rate information called out in Section L | Yes. If the offer has an FPRA or an FPRR, then the offeror does not need to provide historical and budgetary indirect rate data along with sales volume data. However, if the offeror does not have an FPRA or and FPRR then they would need to provide historical and budgetary indirect rate data (to include the pool and base) along with historical and projected sales volume data. |
| 14 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf | Please confirm the attachments 28 thru 34 are the most current | Confirmed |
| 15 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf | Please clarify what attachments listed in the solicitation are considered "workload" for proposal purposes. | Specifically Attachment 0029 TD-02 and TD-10 Food Service Equiptment (FSE) are called out as workload documents, but all documents should be reviewed for proposal to this solicitation to provide workload support. |
| 16 | RFP | W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 34 L.5.2.1.1(c)(5)(i) | Are Offerors limited to only accounting for Holiday and Vacation hour subtractions when developing compensible hour calculations | The government does not determine the offeror's staffing approach to meet this requirement. Offerors should utilize all provided documents provided with this solicitation (i.e. CBA) to develop their proposal. |
| 17 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 49 M.5.2.8(c)(2) | The AADV's listed do not correlate to the current Ft. Campbell program or the workload data. Is the Gov't anticipating a large reduction in workload or are these values incorrect? | The Past Performance Threshhold document provided explains the rational. Please propose to the documents provided in this RFP. |
| 18 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 49 M.5.2.8(c)(2) | Please explain the Government's rationale for utilizing a $12M AADV for this size of program. It appears this amount is in direct conflict with the current size of the operation and the workload provided. | The Past Performance Threshhold document provided explains the rational. Please propose to the documents provided in this RFP. |
| 19 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 49 M.5.2.8(c)(2) | At an EAGLE ASC/ACC-RI Virtual Industry Engagement and Outreach Event, the Government communicated the Government’s average annual dollar value (AADV) for a qualifying past performance reference is “correlated to a forecasted annual value based on the IGCE [independent government cost estimate]". Will the Government please confirm it anticipates Ft. Campbell’s forecasted annual contract value to be approximately $12M? | The Past Performance Threshhold document provided explains the rational. Please propose to the documents provided in this RFP. |
| 20 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 41 L.5.4.2.7 | Are FFP clins/costs subject to Cost Realism reviews and MPC adjustments? | Per M.5.3.1 for the Cost/Price analysis the government intends to perform on offeror's proposal. |
| 21 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 41 L.5.4.2.6 | Are Offeror’s allowed to utilize the ODC plug number to account for required insurances (Insurance liability to third persons, General Liability, etc.) required by the RFP? | All ODCs are evaluated and approved in advance of purchase by the USG. Contractors may not sign lease agreements or recurring service agreements which require ODCs. There are dedicated CLINs for ODCs and items not covered under an ODC are purchased for the contractor by the Government using various methods (GPC, GCSS-A, Fedmall, GSA Advantage, etc.). |
| 22 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 41 L.5.4.2.6 | We understand prime contractor and / or subcontractor Fringe Benefit costs, including H&W, are excluded from the surrogate plug number. Can the Government please confirm? | Per L.5.4.2.6 The CLINs for ODCs are Government provided surrogate numbers, which are inclusive for any Offeror's applicable indirect rate adders. Therefore, the Offeror shall not apply indirect rate adders within its cost/price proposal. |
Additionally, per L.5.4.2.13(a) Indirect rates allocate indirect costs such as overhead, general & administrative (G&A) expense, and fringe benefit costs.
| 23 | RFP | RFP W519TC-23-R-0022.pdf, Page 42 L.5.4.2.12(a) | Please confirm Offeror’s are only required to use the CBA’s wage and H&W costs for periods for which the CBA’s are in effect. | Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBA) is a written contract negotiated through collective bargaining for employees by one or more trade unions with the management of a company (or with an employers' association) that regulates the terms and conditions of employees at work. As such the government does not have any input into a CBA. Therefore, the government cannot confirm offeror’s are only required to use the CBA’s wage and H&W costs for periods for which the CBA’s are in effect. | |
| 24 | 0001 | PWS - Transportation Section - Para 5-29 (Motorpool Operations) | BACKGROUND: The contractor shall manage and operate a transportation motor pool (TMP) providing services to include general administration, dispatch and control of GSA leased fleet and Army Owned Non-Tactical Vehicles listed on TD-09 Government Vehicles in accordance with DoD 4500.36-R, AR 58-1, AR 710-2, AR 385-10, AR 600-55 and TMP SOP(s) (Para 5.29.1) | QUESTION: Will TMP operations be 24/7? | No. The TMP operational hours are normal duty hours, 0730-1600 IAW PWS Section 1.4, para 1.4.1., B08Attachment 0031 TD-04. |
| 25 | 0001 | PWS - Transportation Section | BACKGROUND: Previous PWS had POV Storage as a requirement | QUESTION: Is POV Storage a requirement? | PWS Transportation Section 5.26 does not have a requirement for POV storage. (Current contract does have a requirement in Section 5.28) |
| 26 | 0001 | PWS - Scope of Effort | BACKGROUND: This support will focus primarily on the Maintenance, Supply, and Transportation services that support the installation’s mission. Notwithstanding the inclusion of FAR 52.216-21 in this task order, any maintenance, supply, and transportation tasks currently being performed by an Ability One contractor or under a contract accepted by the Small Business Administration within the 8(a) program at the installation, or subsequently determined appropriate for performance by an Ability One contractor or accepted by the Small Business Administration for inclusion within the 8(a) program, are not included within the scope of this EAGLE requirements task order. (Para 1.2.1) | QUESTION: What Ability One contractors are performing work on Fort Campbell? What type of support are they providing? | Ability One contractors on Fort Campbell are cntracted through the Fort Cmapbell MICC and are engaged primarily in janitorial and grounds maintenance contracts that are outside the scope of the Fort Campbell EAGLE Task Order. Additionally, an Ability One contractor operates the Fort Campbell "EAGLE Mart" which is the primary source for Fort Campbell organizations to purchasa items from that the mart stocks which includes office supplies and general cleaning materials. |
| 27 | N/A | Division OPTEMPO | BACKGROUND: The 101st Airborne Division deploys units on a regular basis. These deployments may require the LRC to surge support | QUESTION: Are there currently any scheduled deployments for the Division or other units on FTCKY? | Questions regarding unit deployments can not be answered and are not relevant to this solicitations. Please propose to the documents provided. |
| 28 | N/A | LRC Facilities | BACKGROUND: Some of the LRC facilities are aging | QUESTION: Are there any scheduled LRC facility engineering projects? | This question is not relevant to the solicitation. |
| 29 | 0001 | PWS - Section 1.3 (Contractor Personnel Requirements) | BACKGROUND: All contractor employees that require a SECRET security clearance must obtain it prior to start of work. Upon notification that an employee has been denied a SECRET security clearance or is in any manner incapable of obtaining a SECRET security clearance that employee will be removed from performance on this contract. Contractor employees with access to restricted areas or classified data will be subject to additional security requirements. Upon request, the contractor shall ensure employees complete questionnaires and other forms for applicable security levels. Failure to obtain required security clearances will not constitute a reason for non-performance. The Government will not sponsor interim clearances. The contractor is responsible to ensure anyone requiring access to information has the appropriate clearance (Para 1.3.12) | Secret Level Clearances are required for: 1) PM. 2) Transportation Division Manager. 3) Electronic Technicians involved in tactical communications equipment repair. 4) Machinist/Welders involved in repair of GSA Classified Containers in support of this solicitation. | Secret Level Clearances are required for: 1) PM. 2) Transportation Division Manager. 3) Electronic Technicians involved in tactical communications equipment repair. 4) Machinist/Welders involved in repair of GSA Classified Containers in support of this solicitation. |
| 30 | 0001 | PWS - Section 1.11 (Automated Systems) | BACKGROUND: The contractor shall assure all automation equipment assigned to the contractor, including property processing equipment, work stations, servers, printers, repeaters, controllers, and personal data collection devices (PDCD) are fully operational and secured. When automated equipment becomes defective, malfunctions, requires routine or scheduled maintenance or upgrade, the contractor shall notify the designated IT support for that system prior to work ordering or requesting replacement. In addition, the contractor shall notify the COR if downtime will negatively affect the mission. The contractor shall refer to the appropriate automated information system (AIS) manual for technical guidance. The contractor shall perform required actions to maintain cleanliness of Government furnished ADPE such as (keyboards, CPU’s, monitors) (Para 1.11.1) | QUESTION: Will automation equipment be transferred from incumbent? | Per PWS para 1.11 (Automated Systems), the government will provide as part of GFE ADPE systems required for the Task Order as well as required operational support for ADPE. GFE ADPE equipment currently operated by the present contractor will be inventoired and returned to governemnt control and may or may not be a source used to meet government responsiblities for providing ADPE equpiment for this Task Order. |
| 31 | 0001 | PWS - Section 1.4 (Contractor Planning, Resource Management) | BACKGROUND: The contractor is expected to adjust normal workday personnel support requirements to reduce any requirements for overtime. Overtime hours are normally required to respond to emergencies, unusually heavy workloads, and unexpected situations that may occur due to unforeseen service requirements. If circumstances indicate the potential need for overtime in order to accomplish a task, the contractor shall request in writing the overtime hours to the COR for endorsement (Para 1.4.1.4). | QUESTION: Does the incumbent provide regular overtime hours (i.e. night flight operations) | PWS - Section 1.4 Overtime is on an as needed basis. There is not set overtime. |
| 32 | 0001 | PWS - Section C-4 (Contractor Furnished Facilities & Equipment) - Para 4.1 (Contractor Furnished Facilities and Equipment – General) | BACKGROUND: The contractor shall procure material, equipment, and supplies, which are incidental to the provision of services of this PWS. The contractor shall ensure on-site maintenance personnel are equipped with proper individual / hand tools for the effort to be completed (i.e. general mechanics tools). The Government will not provide individual tools to be used by maintenance personnel under this effort. Each employee mechanic must have their own tools. The Government has revoked its assumption of risk regarding individual tools used under this effort. At no time will the Government be responsible for the replacement of lost, damaged or broken individual tools (Para 4.1.1) | QUESTION: Are all tools required supplied by the USG? | PWS Para: 4.1 identifies what Facility's and equipment will be furnished by the USG. The contractor shall procure material, equipment, and supplies, which are incidental to the provision of services of this PWS. The contractor shall ensure on-site maintenance personnel are equipped with proper individual / hand tools for the effort to be completed (i.e. general mechanics tools). The Government will not provide individual tools to be used by maintenance personnel under this effort. Each employee mechanic must have their own tools. The Government has revoked its assumption of risk regarding individual tools used under this effort. At no time will the Government be responsible for the replacement of lost, damaged or broken individual tools. With the exception of Special Tools |
| 33 | 0001 | PWS - Section 5.3 (Materiel Maintenance Programs/Efforts) | BACKGROUND: The contractor shall comply with Army Oil Analysis Program (AOAP) per AR 700-132, AR 750-1, TB 43-0210, and TM 38-301-1 (Para 5.3.5) | QUESTION: Will the contractor be required to perform AOAP services or just comply with the program? | The contractor shall comply with Army Oil Analysis Program (AOAP) per AR 700-132, AR 750-1, TB 43-0210, and TM 38-301-1. |
| 34 | 0001 | PWS - Section 5.26 (Transportation - General) | BACKGROUND: The contractor shall be prepared / provide personnel during all hours as necessary to accommodate unscheduled transportation requirements. Due to diverse requirements, many areas requiring transportation support will have varied work hours, as will the need for on-call or standby support (Para 5.26.2) | QUESTION: Is there any historical data on on-call and standby hours required? | TD-04 Hours of operation identifies the FCKY CORE hrs of operation. |
| 35 | 0001 | PWS - Section 5.27 (Personal Property Operations) | BACKGROUND: The contractor shall operate a multi-service Personal Property Processing Office in accordance with Defense Transportation Regulation (DTR) 4500.9-R, Joint Travel Regulation (JTR), and other service-specific governing regulations (Para 5.27.1) | QUESTION: Are there any known changes to the PPSO operations with new Household Goods contract? QUESTION: What is the area of responsibility for the Personal Property inspectors? | Personal Property Inspectors area of responsibility per PWS Section 5.27, para 5.27.8. However, there is no forecasted workload for the contractor to conduct inspections of household goods deliveries as this function is currently performed by Government QAE Inspectors. |
| 36 | 0001 | PWS - Section 5.29 (Motorpool Operations) | BACKGROUND: The contractor shall provide and operate a Post Shuttle Bus Service on a recurring basis that covers selected stop locations (Para 5.29.5) | QUESTION: What are the requirements for the Post Shuttle Bus Service? | PWS Section 5.29, para 5.29.5 Post shuttle service has no projected/planned workload under this Task Order. |
| 37 | 0001 | PWS - Section 5.34 (Rail Operations) | BACKGROUND: 5.34.1 During rail operations, the contactor shall operate and perform field level locomotive maintenance on all Army owned locomotives in accordance with DTR 4500.9-R, AR 56-3, General Code of Operating Rules, TC 55-88-1, TM 4-14.21, AR 750-1 and 49 CFR Parts 200-299, and other rules and regulations as applicable and as directed by the KO (Para 5.34.1) | QUESTION: Are there US Army owned locomotives supporting railhead operations at Fort Campbell? | There are currently four (4) Army owned locomotives that support the rail operations at Fort Campbell. Refer to TD-02 "Transportation" tab, Transportatoin Support - CLN 0005FA for antiipated annual rail workload that these fours locumotives would be used to complete. |
| 38 | 0028 | Attachment 0028 TD-01, Tab Supply, row 53 labeled Food Service Equipment PWS 5.23 and row 24 labeled SSMO PWS 5.17. | BACKGROUND: Row 24 (in the SSMO org section) lists an Appliance Mechanic this is appropriate for Food Service Equipment. However, Row 53 (Food Service Equipment PWS 5.23 also addresses Food Service Equipment but lists the title as a Motor Vehicle Mechanic. | QUESTION: Would the Govt please eliminate the redundancy that appears in Row 53? | RFP Attachment 0028 - TD-01 Workload is a representation of the site's Historical manning and management of the site. Attachment 0028 does not represent the projected manning or management. Please propose to the PWS (Attachment 0001 - Performance Work Statement) and Attachment 0026 - TD-02 Maintenance Density List for the current and future projected workload. |
| 39 | 0028 | Attachment 0028 TD-01, Tab Supply, row 45, labeled Ammunition Supply (listed within the ISSA) | BACKGROUND: Row 45 lists a Supply Technician (w HAZ) – Ammunition Inspector as a task requirement. However, this title is placed in the ISSA org section (where rows are merged). This appears to be a simple error wherein the title should be placed in the ASP org section. | QUESTION: Would the Govt please correct this so that the title in TD-01 can flow into the correct CLIN in Attachment 0002? | RFP Attachment 0028 - TD-01 Workload is a representation of the site's Historical manning and management of the site. Attachment 0028 does not represent the projected manning or management. Please propose to the PWS (Attachment 0001 - Performance Work Statement) and Attachment 0026 - TD-02 Maintenance Density List for the current and future projected workload. |
| 40 | 0028 | B08 Attachment 0028 – TD-01 Historical Workload_FCKY (12 Sep 22) Tab Supply, cells C47and D47 | BACKGROUND: Cell C47 Requirement is labeled Ammunition Supply Point Supervisor; yet the Task description in cell D47 states “The four Equipment Repair Supervisors are responsible for planning, organizing and executing various aspects of the Maintenance Division’s maintenance operations with the four aligned to focus in four major areas (Base Operations Maintenance support, Passback Maintenance support, Unit Support Maintenance support, and a General/Allied Trades Shop supervisor)…”. This task description appears to be incorrect for use in describing the ASP Supervisor’s duty requirements. | The same issue is present for the CIF Supervisor in cell D5. QUESTION: Would the Govt please correct the task description on cells D5 and D47? | RFP Attachment 0028 - TD-01 Workload is a representation of the site's Historical manning and management of the site. Attachment 0028 does not represent the projected manning or management. Please propose to the PWS (Attachment 0001 - Performance Work Statement) and Attachment 0026 - TD-02 Maintenance Density List for the current and future projected workload. |
| 41 | 0008 | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio (7 Mar 21), Tabs A, B, and C | BACKGROUND: (1) Tabs A, B, and C provide CBA information for current contractors. There are several labor classifications (duty position title) that are redundant between the CBAs. For example, Tools and Parts Attendants in listed in Tabs A, B, and C; Warehouse Specialist is listed in Tabs B and C; Material Expeditor is listed in all three Tabs, Material Coordinator is listed in Tabs B and C, etc. (2) Some Titles appear to be misspelled or incorrectly labeled. For example, in Tab A there are titles of Woordcraft Worker and Unexploded Ordianance Technician I. In Tab A there are two titles of Material Coordinator and Coordinator A- both with the same hourly rate. In Tab B the title for a Computer Operator does not distinguish between and Operator I, II, or II, yet Tab A lists all three titles. | (1) Would the Govt please clarify/correct the titles offerors should use? | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements The Gov confirms that these job classifications apply to this solicitation. If there is a conflict please use the CBA title. |
| 42 | 0008 | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio (7 Mar 21), Tabs A, B, and C | BACKGROUND: (1) Tabs A, B, and C provide CBA information for current contractors. There are several labor classifications (duty position title) that are redundant between the CBAs. For example, Tools and Parts Attendants in listed in Tabs A, B, and C; Warehouse Specialist is listed in Tabs B and C; Material Expeditor is listed in all three Tabs, Material Coordinator is listed in Tabs B and C, etc. (2) Some Titles appear to be misspelled or incorrectly labeled. For example, in Tab A there are titles of Woordcraft Worker and Unexploded Ordianance Technician I. In Tab A there are two titles of Material Coordinator and Coordinator A- both with the same hourly rate. In Tab B the title for a Computer Operator does not distinguish between and Operator I, II, or II, yet Tab A lists all three titles. | (2) Would the Govt correct the titles so that B08 Attachement 0008 (CBAs) match workload? | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio: For proposal purposes please refer to the revised TD-02 that crosswalks CBA to CLIN. |
| 43 | 0008 | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio (7 Mar 21), Tabs A, B, and C | BACKGROUND: (1) Tabs A, B, and C provide CBA information for current contractors. There are several labor classifications (duty position title) that are redundant between the CBAs. For example, Tools and Parts Attendants in listed in Tabs A, B, and C; Warehouse Specialist is listed in Tabs B and C; Material Expeditor is listed in all three Tabs, Material Coordinator is listed in Tabs B and C, etc. (2) Some Titles appear to be misspelled or incorrectly labeled. For example, in Tab A there are titles of Woordcraft Worker and Unexploded Ordianance Technician I. In Tab A there are two titles of Material Coordinator and Coordinator A- both with the same hourly rate. In Tab B the title for a Computer Operator does not distinguish between and Operator I, II, or II, yet Tab A lists all three titles. | (3) Would the Govt clarify which rates to use for each labor category for bidding purpose? - different rates ar provided for the same labor category currently. | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio: For proposal purposes please refer to the revised TD-02 that crosswalks CBA to CLIN. |
| 44 | 0008 | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio (7 Mar 21), Tabs A, B, and C | BACKGROUND: (1) Tabs A, B, and C provide CBA information for current contractors. There are several labor classifications (duty position title) that are redundant between the CBAs. For example, Tools and Parts Attendants in listed in Tabs A, B, and C; Warehouse Specialist is listed in Tabs B and C; Material Expeditor is listed in all three Tabs, Material Coordinator is listed in Tabs B and C, etc. (2) Some Titles appear to be misspelled or incorrectly labeled. For example, in Tab A there are titles of Woordcraft Worker and Unexploded Ordianance Technician I. In Tab A there are two titles of Material Coordinator and Coordinator A- both with the same hourly rate. In Tab B the title for a Computer Operator does not distinguish between and Operator I, II, or II, yet Tab A lists all three titles. | (4) Would the Govt provide which sections or labor categories belong to which Union? Currently different rates and benefit packages are provided for the same labor cat within this attachement. | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio: For proposal purposes please refer to the revised TD-02 that crosswalks CBA to CLIN. |
| 45 | 0008 | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio (7 Mar 21), Tabs A, B, and C | BACKGROUND: (1) Tabs A, B, and C provide CBA information for current contractors. There are several labor classifications (duty position title) that are redundant between the CBAs. For example, Tools and Parts Attendants in listed in Tabs A, B, and C; Warehouse Specialist is listed in Tabs B and C; Material Expeditor is listed in all three Tabs, Material Coordinator is listed in Tabs B and C, etc. (2) Some Titles appear to be misspelled or incorrectly labeled. For example, in Tab A there are titles of Woordcraft Worker and Unexploded Ordianance Technician I. In Tab A there are two titles of Material Coordinator and Coordinator A- both with the same hourly rate. In Tab B the title for a Computer Operator does not distinguish between and Operator I, II, or II, yet Tab A lists all three titles. | (6) For the CBA(s) would the Govt please confirm that offerors should use the rates (hourly labor, pension fund, health & welfare) that are effective beginning 18 Aug 2023 (for Tabs A and B), and 1 4 August 2023 for Tab C? | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio: For proposal purposes please refer to the revised TD-02 that crosswalks CBA to CLIN. |
| 46 | 0001 | PWS 1.2.5 | PWS paragraph 1.2.5 indicates that historical workload data is provided in TD-01 and is comprised of planned and unplanned requirements. The provided TD-01 doesn't provide historical workload data. Does the government plan to provide a TD-01 with historical workload data or is the PWS paragraph incorrect? | RFP Attachment 0028 - TD-01 Workload is a representation of the site's Historical manning and management of the site. Attachment 0028 does not represent the projected manning or management. Please propose to the PWS (Attachment 0001 - Performance Work Statement) and Attachment 0026 - TD-02 Maintenance Density List for the current and future projected workload. | |
| 47 | RFP | RFP L.5.2.1.1(b) | The RFP states, " in addition to any supplemental description the offeror can include under the 'Duty Title' column on its Attachment 0002." The provided attachment 0002 has no duty title column. Will clarify the language in the RFP or provide an updated attachment 0002 with the ability to propose a duty title? | "RFP L.5.2.1.1(b) is referring to Column D 'Offeror Provided Position Title or SCA Positions Title/CBA' when it uses the term 'Duty Title'. | |
| 48 | RFP | RFP L.5.2.1.1 (c) | As per the RFP, "Attachment 0028 TD-01 Historical Workload is provided only as a reference point to show how similar workload/requirements have historically been accomplished." The provided TD-01 provides no historical workload data just PWS references, functional areas, and position descriptions, which does not equate to historical data. Based on the government's stated intention to provide this data as a reference point, would they please provide a TD-01 with historical workload data? | RFP Attachment 0028 - TD-01 Workload is a representation of the site's Historical manning and management of the site. Attachment 0028 does not represent the projected manning or management. Please propose to the PWS (Attachment 0001 - Performance Work Statement) and Attachment 0026 - TD-02 Maintenance Density List for the current and future projected workload. | |
| 49 | RFP | RFP L.5.2.1.1 (c) Note | It is further noted in L.5.2.1.1 (c) that the inclusion of only some of the PWS paragraphs in Attachment 0029 (TD-02 Workload Data and Density List) is for Technical evaluation purposes only. The attachment 0029 TD-02 provides no PWS paragraph references to use as cross-reference. Would the the government please provide an updated version of TD-02 with the referenced PWS paragraphs to aid in linking the data to the requirements? | PWS and TD-02 are separate documents that do not crosswalk. Please propose to the workload provided in the TD-02 to support the PWS paragraphs that have been identified for this solicitation. | |
| 50 | 0028 | Attachment 0028 TD-01 Maintenance, Supply, Historical Management tab Task descriptions | Attachment 0028 TD-01 Historical Workload supply tab column D Task Row 36 Retail Supply Supervisor task description reads, "Equipment Repair Supervisors are responsible for planning, organizing and executing various aspects of the Maintenance Division’s maintenance operations with the four aligned to focus in four major areas (Base Operations Maintenance support, Passback Maintenance support, Unit Support Maintenance support, and a General/Allied Trades Shop supervisor)". The provided description seems to be misaligned and doesn't fit appear to describe the responsibilities of a Retail Supply Supervisor. Would the government please review the provided description to confirm the provided description is accurate and, as needed, provide a description that better aligns with the requirement as part of an updated TD-01? | RFP Attachment 0028 - TD-01 Workload is a representation of the site's Historical manning and management of the site. Attachment 0028 does not represent the projected manning or management. Please propose to the PWS (Attachment 0001 - Performance Work Statement) and Attachment 0026 - TD-02 Maintenance Density List for the current and future projected workload. | |
| 51 | 0002 | Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor Mix FCKY 31 Aug 22 | The Base Period Proposed Hours per FTE and the Option Period 1-4 Proposed Hours per FTE, Hours per Year columns are pre-filled. Is it the government intent for industry to use the provided prefilled hours per year for the base period and options period 1-4? | Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor Mix id: Yes, The Base Period Proposed Hours per FTE and the Option Period 1-4 Proposed Hours per FTE, Hours per Year are prefilled out for this proposal. | |
| 52 | 0002 | Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor Mix FCKY 31 Aug 23 | The Base Period Proposed Hours per FTE and the Option Period 1-4 Proposed Hours per FTE employee type column are listed as "Exempt, CBA 1, CBA 2, and SCA". However, the government has included three CBAs in attachment 008, Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio. Would the government please provide an updated attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor Mix that includes CBA 3 as an option when identifying the employee type? | Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor Mix: Has been updated to incluse CBA 3. | |
| 53 | 0037 | Attachment 0037 TD-12 Mobilization Support Services FCKY (AUG22) | The information provided in Attachment 0037 TD-12 Mobilization Support Services FCKY (AUG22) tab Mobilization Support Services indicates the FTE base is 1856; however, when the provided Estimated Hours in column C is divided by 1856, the output doesn't equal the estimated CMEs in column D as the total hours 51658.66 / 1856 equals 27.83 not 30.00. Would the government please fix the mathematical error and provide an updated TD-12? | Attachment 0037 TD-12 Mobilization Support Services has been revised to correct the formula. | |
| 54 | WD 2015-4675, Rev 18 08/26/23 | WD 2015-4675, Rev 18 08/26/23 | The WD includes Juneteenth as a holiday, but the CBAs do not. Which is holiday schedule should be used? | Juneteenth is a recognized Federal Holiday. Please propose to the PWS for Juneteenth | |
| 55 | CBA | CBA | CBAs for the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local Lodge Nos. 2019 and 1296 have merged. Will an updated CBA document be issued? | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements. Thes CBA'a provided are the most current CBA's for proposal purposes. | |
| 56 | RFP | Solicitation, Paragraph L.5.4.2.12(a)(2), page 42 | Paragraph references using the SCA WD Attachment 0007 and shall not include any escalation but does not reference using Attachment 0008 - Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio (7 Mar21).pdf. | Will the Government confirm that Offerors should propose positions covered in the Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBA) in accordance with the CBAs and in accordance with periods covered by the CBAs? | L.5.4.2.12(a)(2) states, When proposing Direct Labor Rates, compliance with the Service Contract Act (SCA) (Attachment 0007, Wage Determination) |
is required.
| 57 | 0008 | B08 Attachment 0008 - Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio ( 7 Mar 21). Pdf | There appear to be 3 separate CBAs that apply to this opportunity. Several labor categories are covered by all three CBAs; however the wage and fringe requirements vary across the 3 CBAs. Due to the variances, without further clarification, Offerors will not be able to accurately determine wage and fringe requirements for several labor categories. | Will the Government provide clarification as to which of the CBAs apply? If all three CBAs apply, will the government provide clarification as to which PWS sections or CLINS are covered by which CBA? | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio: For proposal purposes please refer to the revised TD-02, dated 14Jun23 that crosswalks CBA to CLIN. |
| 58 | 0029 and 0001 | TD-02, Supply Tab and PWS 5.23, page 59 FSE Maintenance | TD-02 identifies SSMO CLIN 0004DA in the Supply Tab, while PWS 5.23 FSE Maintenances is located in the Maintenance Section only, CLIN 0003KA of TD-02. Without clarification offers my charge LCAT hours to the incorrect CLIN. | Will the Government update TD-02 to clarify which CLIN FSE Maintenance PWS 5.23 should be charged to? | PWS 5.23 FSE Maintenance is charged to CLIN 0003KA per B08 Attachment 0029, Maintenance CLIN0003KA-ASC FSC tab. |
| 59 | 0001 | PWS 5.21 Fuel Operations, page 57 | PWS 5.21 provides fuel operation requirements but does not provide any workload history for fuel operations. Without historical workload data for fuel operations, the incumbent is provided an unfair advantage | Will the Government update TD-02 to provide historical workload data for fuel operations? | The is no "Fuel Operations" support provided to customers. Para 5.21.2 refers to the contractor being capable to fuel, by exception, organic emergency back-up generators in the event of long term power outages that effect operations at critical nodes such as the SSMO Cold Storage Warehouse. Additoinally , the contractor will operate the HAZMAT Warehousel which stores and issues packaged POL products. The workload for this is presented in TD-02, Supply tab, for CLIN 0004EA (HMSO) |
| 60 | 0001 | PWS 5.16 CIIIP, page 52 | PWS 5.16 provides CIIP requirements although the is no CIIP CLIN defined in Attachment 2 and Attachment 5. | Will the Government update Attachment 0002 Staffing and Labor Mix, Attachment 0005 Cost Price Matrix, and Attachment 0029 Workload Density to include a CIIP CLIN for Supply? | Attachment 0001 -PWS para 5.16. Please see revised PWS 5.16 has been reserved |
| 61 | 0001 | PWS 5.16 CIIIP, page 52 | PWS 5.16 CIIP is located in the Supply Section only of the PWS; there is no CIIP Supply CLIN in Attach 0002/0005/0029. Without clarification offers my charge LCAT hours to the incorrect CLIN. | If a CIIP Supply CLIN is not added, will the Government verify which CLIN CIIP services should be charged to? | Attachment 0001 -PWS para 5.16. Please see revised PWS 5.16 has been reserved |
| 62 | 0029 and 0001 | PWS 5.16 CIIIP, page 52 and TD-02, Supply Tab | PWS 5.16 provides CIIP requirements although Attachment 29 TD-02 does not provide historical workload for the CIIP. Without historical workload data for CIIP support, the incumbent is provided an unfair advantage | Will the Government update Attachment 0029 TD-02 to provide historical workload data for CIIP operations? | Attachment 0001 -PWS para 5.16. Please see revised PWS 5.16 has been reserved |
| 63 | 0029 | TD-02, Supply Tab and PWS 5.8, page 49 MDRS | TD-02 identifies MDRS CLIN 0004FA in the Supply Tab, while PWS 5.8 MDRS is located in the Maintenance Section only of the PWS; there is no MDRS maintenance CLIN in Attach 0002/0005/0029. Without clarification offers my charge LCAT hours to the incorrect CLIN. | Will the Government update Attach 0002/0005/0029 to include a CLIN for MDRS Maintenance? | Attachment 0029, TD-02 The Government has provided adequate information for this reference. Please refer back to the source document. TD-02 identifies MDRS as CLIN 0003CA |
| 64 | 0029 | TD-02, Supply Tab and PWS 5.8, page 49 MDRS | TD-02 identifies MDRS CLIN 0004FA in the Supply Tab, while PWS 5.8 MDRS is located in the Maintenance Section only of the PWS; there is no MDRS maintenance CLIN in Attach 0002/0005/0029. Without clarification offers my charge LCAT hours to the incorrect CLIN. | If an MDRS Maintenance CLIN is not added, will the Government verify all MDRS actions are to be charged to CLIN 0004FA? | Attachment 0029, TD-02 The Government has provided adequate information for this reference. Please refer back to the source document. TD-02 identifies MDRS as CLIN 0003CA |
| 65 | 0011 | Attachment 0011 | When entering the Start and End Dates in Cells I10 and J10 respectively, for any years after 2022 (Start Date) and 2025 (End Date) the following error message appears: "This value doesn't match the data validation restrictions defined for this cell." This prevents us from entering any contract with start dates for 2023 and end dates after 2025. Please advise. | Updated Attachment 0011, dated 18JUL2023 has been added to Amendment 0002 | |
| 66 | 0008 | Attachment 0008 | Attachment 0008: Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs) all expire in early 2024, either just belore, or just two (2) weeks after the Base Period Full Operational Capability (FOC) performance starts. Will the Government please confirm that there are no more CBA documents (e.g., modifications, addendums, changes, or updates) not already provided in the solicitation and provide them if they do exist? | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements. Thes CBA'a provided are the most current CBA's for proposal purposes. | |
| 67 | 0026/0028 | Attachment 0026 |
Attachment 0028
| Attachment 0028's Supply at the bottom lists a requirement under Attachment 0026 for Vehicle Holding Area; however, Attachment 0026 is for Fuel Lab Operations. Will the Government please clarify the Attachment 0028 historical requirement for both Fuel Lab Operations and Vehicle Holding Area Operations? | RFP Attachment 0028 - TD-01 Workload is a representation of the site's Historical manning and management of the site. Attachment 0028 does not represent the projected manning or management. Please propose to the PWS (Attachment 0001 - Performance Work Statement) and Attachment 0026 - TD-02 Maintenance Density List for the current and future projected workload. | |||
| 68 | 0028 | Attachment 0028 | ||
| Attachment 0028's Supply Tab historical record indicates an Appliance Mechanic requirements under the Subsistence Supply Management Office (SSMO), but then repeats the requirement with a different task description in the Food Service Equipment (FSE). Will the Government please clarify if these requirements are duplicates or separate, and if so, how? | RFP Attachment 0028 - TD-01 Workload is a representation of the site's Historical manning and management of the site. Attachment 0028 does not represent the projected manning or management. Please propose to the PWS (Attachment 0001 - Performance Work Statement) and Attachment 0026 - TD-02 Maintenance Density List for the current and future projected workload. | |||
| 69 | 0028 | Attachment 0028 | ||
| Attachment 0028's Supply Tab historical record indicates an Ammunition Inspector (Haz) under the Supply Support Activity (SSA) and an administrative accounting task with a 4% Haz uplift on Row 43 (ISSA/Haz). Will the Government please clarify if these requirements are in the proper work center and if an administrative accounting task Haz uplift is required? | RFP Attachment 0028 - TD-01 Workload is a representation of the site's Historical manning and management of the site. Attachment 0028 does not represent the projected manning or management. Please propose to the PWS (Attachment 0001 - Performance Work Statement) and Attachment 0026 - TD-02 Maintenance Density List for the current and future projected workload. | |||
| 70 | 0008 | Attachment 0008 | Both CBA 1 and CBA 3 appear to have direct ownership via the Recognition clauses over the Maintenance workforce. Further, the wages for similar labor categories are different. Will the Government please clarify which CBA is to be used for which Maintenance positions? | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio: For proposal purposes please refer to the revised TD-02 that crosswalks CBA to CLIN. |
| 71 | 0008 | Attachment 0008 | Each of the three (3) CBAs has overlap with many common labor categories as well as CBA-defined recognition scope, but the labor categories have different wages and benefits in each CBA. CBA 1 (Local 2022) Recognition defines labor categories including, "All regular hourly full-time employees in the job classifications listed in Appendix A including hourly crew leads employed." CBA 2 (Local 2019) Recognition defines labor categories including, "All full-time and regular part-time warehouse, production, and maintenance employees including stock clerks, warehouse specialists, warehouse leaders, and supply technicians employed as listed in the job classifications listed in Appendix A" (wage table). CBA 3 (Local 1296) Recognition defines labor categories including, "All full-time and part-time Installation Maintenance Division (IMD) wheeled mechanics, Heavy Equipment Mechanics, Motor Vehicle Mechanics, Motor Vehicle Mechanic Leads, Computer Operator IIs, and Tool and Parts Attendants, and all full-time and part-time Installation Transportation division (ITD) Material Expeditors and Computer Operator IIs employed as listed in the job classifications listed in Appendix A" (wage table). Additionally, there are no less than 15 labor categories in the wage tables that are common for more than any single CBA and/or all three (3), all the labor categories in CBA 2 are in CBA 1, and again, wages for identical labor categories are different. Will the Government please assist in defining which CBA applies specifically to which work center requirement to enable offerors to have both a unified and accurate solution both technically and for pricing purposes as well as to prevent the three (3) incumbent companies from being the only companies that know how to properly apply the CBAs to the requirement? | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements Portfolio: For proposal purposes please refer to the revised TD-02 that crosswalks CBA to CLIN. |
| 72 | 0008 | Attachment 0008 | Since the CBA job descriptions often vary from the SCA, will the Government please provide the job descriptions for each job category by CBA? | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements The Gov confirms that these job classifications apply to this solicitation. If there is a conflict please use the CBA title and SCA job description in the CBA SCA crosswalk. |
| 73 | 0008/0028/0029 | Attachment 0008 |
Attachment 0028 Attachment 0029
| The task requirements, in many places, appear to require labor categories that are not present in the CBAs. Will the Government please clarify the requirement and/or provide the duty description for all categories for each CBA? | B08 Attachment 0008 – Collective Bargaining Agreements The Gov confirms that these job classifications apply to this solicitation. If there is a conflict please use the CBA title and SCA job description in the CBA SCA crosswalk. | |
| 74 | 0001/0002/0012 | Attachment 0001 |
Attachment 0002
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .