UMA 2023 SF Umatilla_3 3200000_4.0160.pdf

Inspection Date: 8//21/2023

Route: 3200000 Milepost: 4.0160 Structure No:

OVER

County, (Signature)

BRIDGE INSPECTION AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Structure Name: Date: 1/0/1900

INSPECTION TEAM LEADER: James Carnahan

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3

UMATILLA NATIONAL FOREST

USDA FOREST SERVICE, REGION 6

061406000001010

ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

Umatilla Oregon

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3 SOUTH FORK UMATILLA

Route: / Milepost: Structure No.: 0

Compass (direction approximate)

Bearing: 39 deg.

(Plan-view, No Scale)

ORIENTATION:

Components lateral to flow are counted from Left-to-Right; when viewed from Upstream, looking Downstream … such as: Abutments, Piers, Floor-beams Components in line with flow are counted from Upstream-to-Downstream; when following the flow direction … such as: Girders, Abutment Posts, Pier Columns See also Compass-rose for additional orientation; "N" positioned to approximate north orientation along Span in plan-view … Compass-Bearing, if provided, shows approximate alignment sighting from CL-Abut1 to CL-Abut2

TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

A, or, ABUT: Abutment Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above

AL, or, ALUM: Aluminum APPR: Approach roadway Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above

C, or, COL: Column Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above CL: Centerline, centerline of roadway alignment or center axis along member-shape

D, or, DIA: Diaphragm Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above DS: Downstream

EMB: Embankment F, or FT: Footer

G, or, GR: Girder Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above GL: Glued-laminated

P, or, AP: Abutment Post Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above P, or, PI: Pile Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above

RP: Rail Post Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above US: Upstream

R: Rock, substantial natural outcrop among otherwise small bedform material RAP: Riprap, imported and shaped bank armoring

S: S-shape, steel member with applicable description SB: Scupper Block Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above TH: Thalweg, lowest point of streambed channel TIE: Tie-rod, post tensioning rod joining members with prescribed stress-level

W: W-shape, steel member with applicable description WW: Wing-Wall, angled section of abutment extending beyond shoulder for embankment retention

BRIDGE ORIENTATION AND REPORT ABBREVIATIONS

US A1 WW US A2 WW

DS A2 WWDS A1 WW

APPR 1 APPR 2

RP1 RP2

G 1

G 2 P2

P1

A B

U T

1 A B

U T

P

IE

R

P

IE

R

N

Structure Name: (8)Structure No:

(5D)Route:

Forest:

54.5 14.0 99.9

(45)No. Main Spans: 1

(46)No. Appr Spans: 2

No. Substrs: 2

Rating Date:

(41) Posting Status:

(70) Posting Capacity:

(31)Design Load: Yes/No Due (63,65)Method of Load Rating: Freq. Date Current Posting Signs Yes No N Are weight limit signs required at each end? X N

Correct Signage? N

Yes No Special Inspection Equipment Needed:

Type 3 Type 3S2 Type 3-3

X

Date:

Inspection Team: Leader: Jurisdiction:

Weather: Latitude:

(9)Location: Str. Life Remaining

Inspection Done By: Inspection Done By Name:

Critical Findings:

Narrative Report: (Add additional sheets if necessary)

Misc. INFRA Data

State OREGON

County UMATILLA

ADT 46

(34)Skew:

Substr Type:

(44B)Superstr Type:

Specialized Inspections Required

(23 CFR 650.303)

Correct Requirements?

Description:

From Pendleton, E on Cnty Rd 900, S on FSR 32.

Re-rating required ?

FS - Forest Service Region 6 - Pacific Northwest Region

Inspection Template Revision Date: 06/15/2023

Recommended Inspection Frequency:

James Carnahan 45.68779377

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA

Infra data used for this report was pulled on: 05/15/2023

2:00 PM

(92A) Fracture Critical (92B) Underwater (92C) Special

H20‐44

ALLOWABLE STRESS REPORTED AS TONS

Time Completed:8//21/2023 Time Started:

INSPECTION INFORMATION

James Carnahan Longitude: -118.20542660

FS

Fair condition. Pre-1970 glulam and pending RO review of new load rating. Road closed at SF Umatilla #2 so hiked to bridge for insp.

No stream profile-didn't want to carry rod and too breezy for tape. Cut some brush with saw. See Narrative.

Verified

8/7/1989

(102) Direction of Traffic

Substr Material:

USDA FOREST SERVICE, REGION 6

(11)Milepost: 4.0160

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION

061406000001010

UMATILLA NATIONAL FOREST

(32)Approach Roadway Width:

(48)Max Span:

(52)Deck Width out-out: 15.80

WG12; glulam girders, naillam cantilever deck, conc piers.

(51)Roadway Width (Curb to Curb):

Security ID 0614WALLA WALLA

3200000

24.00

BRIDGE DESCRIPTION and MEASUREMENTS

Umatilla National Forest District:

38.00 (27)Year Built:

(6)Feature Crossed:

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3

2:30 PM

Light rain, warm.

Months Inspection Cost

(49)Overall Br Length: 36.00

Steel Running Plank

NBIS Bridge Opening:

99.99 30 inger/Multi-Beam Or Gird

(53)Vertical(47)Horizontal 1 LANE BRIDGE, 2-WAY TRAFFIC (28A) Lanes on the Structure 1

Column Pier

Open, No Restriction

At Or Above Legal Loads

SPECIALIZED INSPECTIONS:

(43B)Superstr Type:

BRIDGE RATING SUMMARY:

Timber - Treated (108A) Wearing

Surface:

(107)Deck StructureType:

(43A)Superstr Material:

(44A)Appr. Superstr Mat'l:

Timber, Glulam, Treated

Concrete, Reinforced

Structure Name: (8)Structure No:

(5D)Route:

Forest:

Development Status: Date:

DATA Safe

Vehicle Type Date Oper. Load

HL-93

HS20-44 8/7/89 2 - ALLOWABLE STRESS REPORTED AS TONS 47.00

Type 3 8/7/89 2 - ALLOWABLE STRESS REPORTED AS TONS 42.00 Type 3S2 8/7/89 2 - ALLOWABLE STRESS REPORTED AS TONS 64.00 Type 3-3 8/7/89 2 - ALLOWABLE STRESS REPORTED AS TONS 81.00

NRL

SU4

SU5

SU6

SU7

EV2

EV3

Permit 1

Permit 2

Permit 3

Permit 4

User Defined 1

User Defined 2

User Defined 3

User Defined 4

Special

Alt. Interstate

H Loading

Railroad

Uniform

Gross Load Only

Gross Load

Inv.

Safe

Posting

31.00

35.00

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3 061406000001010

3200000 (11)Milepost: 4.0160

Method

48.00

61.00

Umatilla National Forest District: WALLA WALLA Security ID 0614 EXISTING - ACTIVE Jurisdiction: FS - FOREST SERVICE 8//21/2023

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA(6)Feature Crossed:

LOAD RATING DATA

UMATILLA NATIONAL FOREST

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3 # Route: 3200000 / Milepost: 4.016 Structure No.: 061406000001010

CODE

Good

1. Good AC, 30' eacj emd/

2. Fair Needs brushing

3. Good

4. Good

6 1/4" X 36" steel boilerplate each wheel track.

* 1. Good 1 7/8" X 7 1/2" naillam, wear rut between running plaates about 1/2" de[.

C1. N/A C2. Good 11"w X 14 1/2"h w/ 4X4 blocking, wood, checked, ant holes D/s near BOB but sonded OK.

C3. N/A C4. Fair Under curbs but water stands in wear rut.

C5. N/A C6. Fair Grit and leaves along edges.

C7. N/A C0 Deck OTHER N/A

* 1. 3 Girder Fair 11" X 28" glulam, midheight checks exterior of U/s and D/S girders.

a. Girder Diaphragms Good Steel truss type.

b. Girder Bracing N/A

* 2. N/A

* 3. N/A

* 4. N/A

a. Trusses Bracing N/A

b. Trusses Chord N/A

c. Trusses Portal N/A

d. Trusses Vertical/Diagonal N/A

C1. Good Steel shoes.

C2. Poor Mostly flaked off railing, from age it is probably lead based.

C3. N/A Not observed.

C4. N/A Not observed.

C0 Superstructure OTHER N/A

7 Concrete columns with cap, no breast wall.

*1. N/A *2. N/A *3. N/A *4. N/A *5. Select *6. Good 3" X 12" nom backwall, attached to ends of girders, creosote. EOB has gabions w/ geotextile to hold approach fill. It is behind wall, not under it.

*7. N/A *8. N/A *9. N/A *10. N/A *11. Good *12. Good *13. Good *14. Good *15. N/A *16. Good *17. N/A Buried.

*18. N/A

C0 Substructure OTHER N/A

1 Also includes wingwalls connected to the superstructure above the beam seat.

Vibration Under Load

Abutments Weep Holes

A B

U T

M E

N T

S

Abutments Footings/Sills

Abutments Wing Walls

Abutments Alignments

Abutments Bearing Seats

Abutments Settlement

Piers Bearing Seats

Piers Erosion or Scour

Piers Piles and Bracing

Piers Columns or Walls Piers Footings

P

IE

R S

Piers Settlement

Piers Alignment (Tiping, Tilting)

* Only items with asterisk are used in the determination of the overall condition rating for that category, e.g. Deck, Superstructure, Substructure. Other items should be rated and remarked on but NOT included in determining the overall category rating. Items enumerated using a C (ex. C1) should be commented on but not rated.

See the FHWA Coding Guide for further information as to what is included in condition ratings.

Floor Beam

60. SUBSTRUCTURE:

Piers Caps

Abutments Caps

Abutments Backwalls

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE:

Sidewalks Drains and Drainage Rideability Cleanliness Utilities

Deck Joints Curbs

Stringer

Abutments Erosion or Scour

Abutments Piles/Bracing

Bearing Devices Paint

Trusses

Deflection Under Load

Wearing Surfaces

Deck Slab/Panels/Joists

(Overall Code for item, to be reported to

58. DECK:

APPROACH CONDITION:

Surfacing Shoulder Embankment Roadway Embankment Approach Settlememt

REMARKS

CONDITION CODES and REMARKS

CODE(Overall Code for item, to be reported to REMARKS CONDITION CODES and REMARKS

2 Includes wingwalls integral with the abutment or the portion of the wingwall below the bearing seat.

CODE(Overall Code for item, to be reported to REMARKS CONDITION CODES and REMARKS

1. Good

2. Good Natural only.

3. Good Heavy brush, some trees, grass.

4. Good

5. Good

6. Good 7.7'.

C0 Channel OTHER N/A

N/A *1. Shape N/A *2. N/A *3. N/A *4. N/A

5. N/A C0 Culvert OTHER N/A

36. TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES:

36A. 0 Warrant for curbs only, rail may remain until curb replaced w/ MASH std.

36B. 0 36C. 0 With bridge rail need approach rail

36D. 0

1.

N/A

Has never had a stream name sign since I've been doing inspections.

2.

Poor Type-3 at BOB but up to 70 bullet holes. Missing EOB. Need to be replaced at

4' ht.

72. APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT: 6

1. 6 General S curve.

2. 8 On grade.

29. ROAD ADT 46

67. STRUCTURAL EVALUATION 5

68. DECK GEOMETRY: 6 Clear width 14.0', one lane, ADT 0-100.

69. UNDERCLEARANCE: N

71. WATERWAY ADEQUACY: 8

113. SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES: 4

Other potential Critical Findings? Describe on Critical Findings Tab

Abutment and Pier Types:

Load Rating Sketches

Channel Scour/Erosion Channel Protection Vegetation Waterway Obstruction/Drift

61. CHANNEL and CHANNEL PROTECTION:

APPRAISAL CODES and REMARKS CONDITION of Elements

A P

P R

A

IS

A L o f e le m e n ts

Vertical

Seams or Joints Material Condition Foundations Headwall/Wingwall

Observed Lateral Movement Clear Height

62. CULVERTS

Bridge Railing Rail Transitions Approach Guardrails

Approach Rail Ends

Signing

Object Markers

Horizontal

* Only items with asterisk are used in the determination of the overall condition rating for that category, e.g. Deck, Superstructure, Substructure. Other items should be rated and remarked on but NOT included in determining the overall category rating. Items enumerated using a C (ex. C1) should be commented on but not rated.

See the FHWA Coding Guide for further information as to what is included in condition ratings.

Yes Wall Type Abutment Spill Through Pier(s)

Timber Steel Concrete

Show SI&A Sheet

Milepost: 4.0160 Structure No.:

Work Item Category

Detailed Work Item Description C.F.

Related

Inspection Routine bridge inspection every 2 years

Deck Replace curb with MASH standard.

Channel Brush around bridge along with approaches.

Approach Condition

Traffic Safety Features

Replace 4 Type-3 Object Markers at 4' height.

Inspection Pre-1970 glulam and needs new load rating.

Date:SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3

Route:

Structure Name:

061406000001010

8//21/2023

UnitWork Item Quantity

3200000

RECOMMENDED WORK ITEMS

6002001

7001001

Work Item Code

3006002

9001002

8003001

9006001002

Curbs / Repair/Replace-Timber 110

Waterway Obstruction/Drift / Remove Debris/Vegetation

LF

HR

LSRoutine Bridge Inspection / Routine

1LS/BGeneral / Brush Approaches

Load Rate Bridge / Timber / Routine 1

EA

LS

Signing / Repair/Replace Object Markers

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Date:

3200000 Milepost: 4.0160 Structure No:

Item Reference

2023;

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3Structure Name:

Route:

8//21/2023

061406000001010

Road is closed at SF Umatilla #2 from wash out and road is washed out several places between #2 and #3. Needs major rebuild.

I hiked to #3 and Thomas Creek to do inspections.

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS ~ NARRATIVE REPORT

Remarks

Missing OMs at EOB, others have up to 70 bullet holes so all need to be replaced.

Longitudinal checks in exterior sides of exterior girders.

Needs brushing and I did some.

Route: Milepost: Structure No:

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3 8//21/2023

3200000 4.0160 061406000001010

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Near Approach, looking ahead, OMs need to be replaced at 4' ht. Road is closed.

Far Approach, looking back, OMs need to be replaced at 4'.

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3 8//21/2023

3200000 4.0160 061406000001010

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Structure Topside View, wear rut between running plates.

Structure Underside View, framed X-bracing.

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3 8//21/2023

3200000 4.0160 061406000001010

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Upstream Elevation View

Downstream Elevation View

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Near Abutment Elevation, stream flow from "left"

Far Abutment Elevation, stream flow from "right"

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3 8//21/2023 3200000 4.0160 061406000001010

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3 8//21/2023

3200000 4.0160 061406000001010

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Stream View from Structure, looking upstream

Stream View from Structure, looking downstream

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3 8//21/2023

3200000 4.0160 061406000001010

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Typical section. There are checks in exterior sides of both exterior girders but they don't show in this photo.

Shot up OM at BOB U/S (typical) and both OMs missing at EOB.

Structure Name: Date:

Route: Milepost: 4.0160

7.7

2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031

2.0 6.6 Not Not

8.0 10 taken taken.

14.0 11.7

20.0 11.9

26.0 12

32.0 12

38.0 11.3

44.0 9.7

50.0 6.2

Water Surface 11.3

Distance Measured from Upstream Side

Channel Cross Section

Horizontal Dist Measured from A-1

8//21/2023

Structure No: 061406000001010

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3

Input Cross-Section Data:

Height (feet) from thalweg to bottom of lowest superstructure member

3200000

Horizontal Dist.

Location Notes

Top of Rail

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0

Top of Rail

(Substructure elements can be inserted in the cross‐section using Insert, Shapes )

Milepost:

ID

Description

Needed for Real Property Verification

N Re-rating required? (Enter Y/N) N Specialized Equipment Required? (Enter Y/N)

Insp Remarks

Fair condition. Pre-1970 glulam and pending RO review of new load rating. Road closed at SF Umatilla #2 so hiked to bridge for insp. No stream profile-didn't want to carry rod and too breezy for tape. Cut some brush with saw. See Narrative.

Approach Rail Ends (36D) 0

James Carnahan James Carnahan

Insp Team

Transition (36B) 0 Approach Guardrail (36C) 0

Traffic Rail Safety Features Appraisal Bridge Rail (36A) 0

Approach Align (72) 6

Underclr (69) N Waterway Adq (71) 8

Str Eval (67) 5 Deck Geom (68) 6

Main Data Appraisal Data

Done By Name (Unit) Region 6 - Pacific Northwest Region

Inspected By* James Carnahan Done By (Org) FS - Forest Service

Scour Crit Br (113) 4 Insp Resp Name FS - FOREST SERVICE

Culvert Cond (62) N/A Channel Cond (61) 7

Supstr Cond (59) 5 Substr Cond (60) 7

Wear Srfc Cond 6 Deck Cond (58) 6

Inspection Cost $0.00 Aprch Cond Good

Main Data Appraisal Data

Insp Team Leader

Inspection_Type (System Generated) (System Generated) Inspection Date 8//21/2023 ROUTINE Inspection Freq 24

Infra Summary Data

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3 8//21/2023

Route: 3200000 4.0160 Structure No: 061406000001010

Structure Name: Date: 8//21/2023 Route: Milepost: 061406000001010

Intermediate Piers Not on Piles or Bedrock Codings

Scour Scenarios Scour Critical Code Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No High Low Yes No

X X X X X X Ideal field conditions. No active scour or stream stability issues 5

Footing Exposed Only 4

Footing Exposed Plus Constriction, Unstable, Attacking, debris potential 2

Bridge Constricts Channel > 10% 5

Bridge Constricts Channel > 10% plus Unstable, Attacking alignment, debris potential (evaluate severity, substrate) 4 or 2

Bridge on Unstable Channel 5

Bridge on Unstable Channel with attacking alignment or debris potential (evaluate severity) 4 or 2

Designed countermeasures installed, stable and performing well. 7

Severe scour, abutment failing 1 or 0

None of the above, Needs further review 6

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #3

3200000 Structure No:

Scour Critical Coding, Item 113 Field Evaluation Guide

Parameters no no no no low no

Is Footing Exposed?

Is Channel Constriction greater than 10%?

Is Stream Laterally or Vertically Unstable?

Is Flow Alignment Attacking? Debris Potential Other factors

4.0160 yes no no no low no no no no yes no low no yes no yes no no low no no yes Channel seems to be stable over last several years, including

2020 when road washed out.

Fill in

Fill In

Fill In no yes Fill in yes (undermined) Fill in no