UMA 2023 SF Umatilla_2 3200000_1.1650.pdf

Inspection Date:

Route: 3200000 Milepost: 1.1650 Structure No:

OVER

County, (Signature)

BRIDGE INSPECTION AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Structure Name: Date: 1/0/1900

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2

UMATILLA NATIONAL FOREST

USDA FOREST SERVICE, REGION 6

061406000001009

ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

Umatilla Oregon

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2 SOUTH FORK UMATILLA

INSPECTION TEAM LEADER: James Carnahan

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Route: / Milepost: Structure No.: 0

Compass (direction approximate)

Bearing: 39 deg.

(Plan-view, No Scale)

ORIENTATION:

Components lateral to flow are counted from Left-to-Right; when viewed from Upstream, looking Downstream … such as: Abutments, Piers, Floor-beams Components in line with flow are counted from Upstream-to-Downstream; when following the flow direction … such as: Girders, Abutment Posts, Pier Columns See also Compass-rose for additional orientation; "N" positioned to approximate north orientation along Span in plan-view … Compass-Bearing, if provided, shows approximate alignment sighting from CL-Abut1 to CL-Abut2

TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

A, or, ABUT: Abutment Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above

AL, or, ALUM: Aluminum APPR: Approach roadway Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above

C, or, COL: Column Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above CL: Centerline, centerline of roadway alignment or center axis along member-shape

D, or, DIA: Diaphragm Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above DS: Downstream

EMB: Embankment F, or FT: Footer

G, or, GR: Girder Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above GL: Glued-laminated

P, or, AP: Abutment Post Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above P, or, PI: Pile Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above

RP: Rail Post Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above US: Upstream

R: Rock, substantial natural outcrop among otherwise small bedform material RAP: Riprap, imported and shaped bank armoring

S: S-shape, steel member with applicable description SB: Scupper Block Suffix with ## numbering sequence per reference above TH: Thalweg, lowest point of streambed channel TIE: Tie-rod, post tensioning rod joining members with prescribed stress-level

W: W-shape, steel member with applicable description WW: Wing-Wall, angled section of abutment extending beyond shoulder for embankment retention

BRIDGE ORIENTATION AND REPORT ABBREVIATIONS

US A1 WW US A2 WW

DS A2 WWDS A1 WW

APPR 1 APPR 2

RP1 RP2

G 1

G 2 P2

P1

A B

U T

1 A B

U T

P

IE

R

P

IE

R

N

Structure Name: (8)Structure No:

(5D)Route:

Forest:

83.5 14.1 99.9

(45)No. Main Spans: 2

(46)No. Appr Spans: 0

No. Substrs: 3

Rating Date:

(41) Posting Status:

(70) Posting Capacity:

(31)Design Load: Yes/No Due (63,65)Method of Load Rating: Freq. Date Current Posting Signs Yes No N Are weight limit signs required at each end? X N

Correct Signage? N

Yes No Special Inspection Equipment Needed:

Type 3 Type 3S2 Type 3-3

X

Date:

Inspection Team: Leader: Jurisdiction:

Weather: Latitude:

(9)Location: Str. Life Remaining

Inspection Done By: Inspection Done By Name:

Critical Findings:

Narrative Report: (Add additional sheets if necessary)

Misc. INFRA Data

State OREGON

County UMATILLA

ADT 46

1 LANE BRIDGE, 2-WAY TRAFFIC (28A) Lanes on the Structure 1

Wall Abutment

Open, No Restriction

At Or Above Legal Loads

SPECIALIZED INSPECTIONS:

(43B)Superstr Type:

BRIDGE RATING SUMMARY:

Timber - Treated (108A) Wearing

Surface:

(107)Deck StructureType:

(43A)Superstr Material:

(44A)Appr. Superstr Mat'l:

Timber, Glulam, Treated

Concrete, Reinforced

1:00 PM

Soft but steady rain, warm.

Months Inspection Cost

(49)Overall Br Length: 75.00

Asphalt Concrete Pavement

NBIS Bridge Opening:

99.99 20 inger/Multi-Beam Or Gird

(53)Vertical(47)Horizontal

USDA FOREST SERVICE, REGION 6

(11)Milepost: 1.1650

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION

061406000001009

UMATILLA NATIONAL FOREST

(32)Approach Roadway Width:

(48)Max Span:

(52)Deck Width out-out: 16.10

WG20; glulam girders, naillam deck, conc abuts/ctr pier

(51)Roadway Width (Curb to Curb):

Security ID 0614WALLA WALLA

3200000

24.00

BRIDGE DESCRIPTION and MEASUREMENTS

Umatilla National Forest District:

39.30 (27)Year Built:

(6)Feature Crossed:

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA

Infra data used for this report was pulled on: 05/15/2023

12:05 PM

(92A) Fracture Critical (92B) Underwater (92C) Special

H20‐44

ALLOWABLE STRESS REPORTED AS TONS

Time Completed:08/21/2023 Time Started:

INSPECTION INFORMATION

James Carnahan Longitude: -118.18732870

FS

Fair condition. Pre-1970 glulam and pending RO review of load rating. AC cracked 3'-8' spacing, needs repair/replacement. Flood 2020 washed out part of BOB approach and road closed at this bridge. See Narrative.

Verified

8/7/1989

(102) Direction of Traffic

Substr Material:

From Pendleton, E on Cnty Rd 900, S on FSR 32.

Re-rating required ?

FS - Forest Service 8/21/2023

Inspection Template Revision Date: 06/15/2023

Recommended Inspection Frequency:

James Carnahan 45.72118759

(34)Skew:

Substr Type:

(44B)Superstr Type:

Specialized Inspections Required

(23 CFR 650.303)

Correct Requirements?

Description:

Structure Name: (8)Structure No:

(5D)Route:

Forest:

Development Status: Date:

DATA Safe

Vehicle Type Date Oper. Load

HL-93

HS20-44 8/7/89 2 - ALLOWABLE STRESS REPORTED AS TONS 31.00

Type 3 8/7/89 2 - ALLOWABLE STRESS REPORTED AS TONS 39.00 Type 3S2 8/7/89 2 - ALLOWABLE STRESS REPORTED AS TONS 61.00 Type 3-3 8/7/89 2 - ALLOWABLE STRESS REPORTED AS TONS 66.00

NRL

SU4

SU5

SU6

SU7

EV2

EV3

Permit 1

Permit 2

Permit 3

Permit 4

User Defined 1

User Defined 2

User Defined 3

User Defined 4

Special

Alt. Interstate

H Loading

Railroad

Uniform

Gross Load Only

Gross Load

Security ID 0614 EXISTING - ACTIVE Jurisdiction: FS - FOREST SERVICE 8/21/2023

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA(6)Feature Crossed:

LOAD RATING DATA

UMATILLA NATIONAL FOREST

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION

(11)Milepost: 1.1650

Method

46.00

50.00

Umatilla National Forest District: WALLA WALLA

Inv.

Safe

Posting

29.00

24.00

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2 061406000001009

3200000

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2 Date: 8/21/2023 Route: 3200000 / Milepost: 1.165 Structure No.: 061406000001009

CODE

Poor

1. Poor Part of BOB approach washed away in 2020 flood.

2. Poor

3. Poor Partial washout at BOB, about 1/2 road width.

4. Poor Partial washout at BOB, about 1/2 road width.

4 AC, transverse cracks 3'-8' spacing, 8" dia hole worn through near middle.

* 1. Good 1 7/8" X 5 3/4" act, naillam, lams coming loose at end of deck, treated.

C1. Poor Failing at center and ends with gaps.

C2. Poor 10"w X 12"h w/ blocks, wood decay, badly checked, plants growing.

C3. N/A C4. Fair Drains through deck and under curbs. 1.36% longitudinal grade.

C5. Poor Rough AC from cracks but couldn’t drive it because of washout approach.

C6. Good C7. N/A C0 Deck OTHER N/A

* 1. 3 Girder Good 11" X 31" glulam, 1A and 1B, multiple checks at laminate lines.

a. Girder Diaphragms Good 4" X 6" wood w/ steel hangers, 4 at equal spacing, at bottom.

b. Girder Bracing N/A

* 2. N/A

* 3. N/A

* 4. N/A

a. Trusses Bracing N/A

b. Trusses Chord N/A

c. Trusses Portal N/A

d. Trusses Vertical/Diagonal N/A

C1. Good Steel shoes.

C2. Poor Mostly flaked off railing, from age probably lead based.

C3. N/A Not observed.

C4. N/A Not observed.

C0 Superstructure OTHER N/A

4 Concrete including center pier.

*1. Good *2. Poor Scour aat BOB to bottom of footing.

*3. Good *4. Fair Crazing.

*5. N/A *6. Fair BOB 14" square spall and 3' honeycomb at base.

*7. Fair *8. Poor BOB D/S footing scoured to bottom of footing.

*9. N/A *10. Poor BOB D/S wingwall washed out but structure seems OK.

*11. Good *12. Poor Top 36" of 60" footing exposed at pier but unchanged.

*13. Good *14. Fair Crazing.

*15. Fair i.e. top of cap.

*16. Good *17. Poor Top 36" of 60" footing exposed at pier but unchanged.

*18. N/A

C0 Substructure OTHER N/A

1 Also includes wingwalls connected to the superstructure above the beam seat.

2 Includes wingwalls integral with the abutment or the portion of the wingwall below the bearing seat.

Wearing Surfaces

Deck Slab/Panels/Joists

(Overall Code for item, to be reported to

58. DECK:

APPROACH CONDITION:

Surfacing Shoulder Embankment Roadway Embankment Approach Settlememt

REMARKS

CONDITION CODES and REMARKS

Floor Beam

60. SUBSTRUCTURE:

Piers Caps

Abutments Caps

Abutments Backwalls

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE:

Sidewalks Drains and Drainage Rideability Cleanliness Utilities

Deck Joints Curbs

Stringer

Abutments Erosion or Scour

Abutments Piles/Bracing

Bearing Devices Paint

Trusses

Deflection Under Load

Piers Bearing Seats

Piers Erosion or Scour

Piers Piles and Bracing

Piers Columns or Walls Piers Footings

P

IE

R S

Piers Settlement

Piers Alignment (Tiping, Tilting)

* Only items with asterisk are used in the determination of the overall condition rating for that category, e.g. Deck, Superstructure, Substructure. Other items should be rated and remarked on but NOT included in determining the overall category rating. Items enumerated using a C (ex. C1) should be commented on but not rated.

See the FHWA Coding Guide for further information as to what is included in condition ratings.

Vibration Under Load

Abutments Weep Holes

A B

U T

M E

N T

S

Abutments Footings/Sills

Abutments Wing Walls

Abutments Alignments

Abutments Bearing Seats

Abutments Settlement

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2 Date: 8/21/2023 Route: 3200000 / Milepost: 1.165 Structure No.: 061406000001009

CODE(Overall Code for item, to be reported to REMARKS CONDITION CODES and REMARKS

1. Poor Footings exposed at bridge. Channel changd in 2020 flood toward BOB.

2. Fair Natural except concrete retaining walls BOB, U/S and D/S.

3. Good

4. Poor Debris pile U/S on center pier.

5. Good

6. Good 10.9'.

C0 Channel OTHER N/A

N/A *1. Shape N/A *2. N/A *3. N/A *4. N/A

5. N/A C0 Culvert OTHER N/A

36. TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES:

36A. 0 Timber rail may remain until replaced by MASH standard.

36B. 0 36C. 0 Approach rail should be added.

36D. 0

1.

Poor

Stream name sign missing.

2. Fair Type-3 each corner but need to be raised to 4'.

72. APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT: 6

1. 6 In S curve.

2. 8 On grade, 1.36% grade on bridge.

29. ROAD ADT 46

67. STRUCTURAL EVALUATION 4

68. DECK GEOMETRY: 6 Clear width 14.1', one lane, ADT 0-100.

69. UNDERCLEARANCE: N

71. WATERWAY ADEQUACY: 8

113. SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES: 4

Other potential Critical Findings? Describe on Critical Findings Tab

Abutment and Pier Types:

Load Rating Sketches

Vertical

Seams or Joints Material Condition Foundations Headwall/Wingwall

Observed Lateral Movement Clear Height

62. CULVERTS

Bridge Railing Rail Transitions Approach Guardrails

Approach Rail Ends

Signing

Object Markers

Horizontal

* Only items with asterisk are used in the determination of the overall condition rating for that category, e.g. Deck, Superstructure, Substructure. Other items should be rated and remarked on but NOT included in determining the overall category rating. Items enumerated using a C (ex. C1) should be commented on but not rated.

See the FHWA Coding Guide for further information as to what is included in condition ratings.

A P

P R

A

IS

A L o f e le m e n ts

Channel Scour/Erosion Channel Protection Vegetation Waterway Obstruction/Drift

61. CHANNEL and CHANNEL PROTECTION:

APPRAISAL CODES and REMARKS CONDITION of Elements

Yes Wall Type Abutment Spill Through Pier(s)

Timber Steel Concrete

Show SI&A Sheet

Milepost: 1.1650 Structure No.:

Work Item Category

Detailed Work Item Description C.F.

Related

Inspection Routine bridge inspection every 2 years

Deck Repair cracks in joints all three joints.

Substructure Repair where scour has damaged. Also on adjoining wall

Substructure Add rip rap to piers and abutments to extend life.

Approach Condition

Replace fill at BOB where washed away in Feb 2020 flooding.ESt 12 X 12 X 10/27 =

53 CY.

Approach Condition

Repave approach after repairing fill that has washed out. Est 16 X

20 = 320 SF.

Traffic Safety Features

Replace with crash rated type.

This would probably require new deck.

Traffic Safety Features

Install crash rated approach rail.

Inspection Pre-1970 glulam and needs new load rating.

Traffic Safety Features

Raise OMs to 4'. 4

Approach Railing / Install Bridge Approach Rail

Load Rate Bridge / Timber / Routine 1

LF

LF

LS

EA

Bridge Railing / Upgrade Bridge Railing

Signing / Repair/Replace Object Markers

Embankment / Repair Approach Fill 1

Surfacing / Patch/Repair Asphalt 320SF

CY

LS/B

Concrete Abutments/Piers / Add/Repair Riprap

Repair/Replace Joints 48

Concrete Abutments/Piers / Repair/Patch

LF

SF

LSRoutine Bridge Inspection / Routine

9006001002

8003001

7004002

8001002

8002002

5003001

5003005

7003002

Work Item Code

9001002

UnitWork Item Quantity

3200000

RECOMMENDED WORK ITEMS

Date:SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2

Route:

Structure Name:

061406000001009

08/21/2023

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Date:

3200000 Milepost: 1.1650 Structure No:

Item Reference

2023;

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS ~ NARRATIVE REPORT

Remarks

Bridge is warranted for new crash raated rail and approach rail to be added. New bridge rail would require new deck.

Deck joints need to be cleaned out, repaired and then deck and approaches need to be reppave.

BOB approach washout needs to be filled in and AC repaired.

There are several washouts of the entire road U/S of this bridge and places where the road is filled in from cut bank side. SF Umatilla #3 and Thomas Creek were accessed for inspection by hiking to them.

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2Structure Name:

Route:

08/21/2023

061406000001009

Route: Milepost: Structure No:

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Near Approach, looking ahead, road woshed out behind eco block, OMs need to be raised to 4'.

Far Approach, looking back, OMs need to be raised to 4'.

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2 08/21/2023 3200000 1.1650 061406000001009

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Structure Topside View, curb and rialing should be replaced with MASH standard but can remain until replaced. AC suface cracked.

Structure Underside View, diaphragms should be at top.

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2 08/21/2023

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Upstream Elevation View

Downstream Elevation View, debris on center pier.

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2 08/21/2023

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2 08/21/2023

3200000 1.1650 061406000001009

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Near Abutment Elevation, stream flow from "right", washed out behind D/S wall.

Far Abutment Elevation, stream flow from "left".

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Stream View from Structure, looking upstream

Stream View from Structure, looking downstream

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2 08/21/2023

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2 08/21/2023

3200000 1.1650 061406000001009

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Center pier looking from BOB. Footing exposed but 60" deep, debris caught.

Debris on center pier.

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2 08/21/2023

3200000 1.1650 061406000001009

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Washed out BOB approach.

Looking along BOB approach fill washout.

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2 08/21/2023

3200000 1.1650 061406000001009

BRIDGE PHOTOS

Typical end joint with poor AC.

AC cracks on bridge.

Structure Name: Date:

Route: Milepost: 1.1650

10.9

2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031

0.0 13 13.1 13.3

6.0 13.6 11.7 11.8

13.0 14.6 12 12

19.0 14.2 12.1 12.3

26.0 14.5 12.9 12.4

32.0 14.7 12.5 13.4

39.0 14 11.7 11.8

45.0 11.9 11.8 11.5

51.0 13 12.7 13

58.0 13.3 11.5 12.8

64.0 12.3 12.5 12.3

71.0 10.8 10.8 11

77.0 8 8.1 8.3

84.0 4.3 4.4 4.3

Water Surface 13.3 11.5 11.3

Channel Cross Section

Horizontal Dist Measured from A-1

08/21/2023

Structure No: 061406000001009

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2

Input Cross-Section Data:

Height (feet) from thalweg to bottom of lowest superstructure member

3200000

Horizontal Dist.

Location Notes

Top of RailDistance Measured from Upstream Side

W L measurement.

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0

Top of Rail

(Substructure elements can be inserted in the cross‐section using Insert, Shapes )

Milepost:

ID

Description

Needed for Real Property Verification

N Re-rating required? (Enter Y/N) N Specialized Equipment Required? (Enter Y/N)

Infra Summary Data

Structure Name: SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2 8/21/2023

Route: 3200000 1.1650 Structure No: 061406000001009

Main Data Appraisal Data

Insp Team Leader

Inspection_Type (System Generated) (System Generated) Inspection Date 08/21/2023 ROUTINE Inspection Freq 24

Wear Srfc Cond 4 Deck Cond (58) 6

Inspection Cost $0.00 Aprch Cond Poor

Culvert Cond (62) N/A Channel Cond (61) 5

Supstr Cond (59) 6 Substr Cond (60) 4

Inspected By* James Carnahan Done By (Org) FS - Forest Service

Scour Crit Br (113) 4 Insp Resp Name FS - FOREST SERVICE

Main Data Appraisal Data

Done By Name (Unit)

Str Eval (67) 4 Deck Geom (68) 6

Approach Align (72) 6

Underclr (69) N Waterway Adq (71) 8

Insp Remarks

Fair condition. Pre-1970 glulam and pending RO review of load rating. AC cracked 3'-8' spacing, needs repair/replacement. Flood 2020 washed out part of BOB approach and road closed at this bridge. See Narrative.

Approach Rail Ends (36D) 0

James Carnahan James Carnahan

Insp Team

Transition (36B) 0 Approach Guardrail (36C) 0

Traffic Rail Safety Features Appraisal Bridge Rail (36A)

Structure Name: Date: 8/21/2023 Route: Milepost: 061406000001009

Vertical Wall Abutments Not on Piles or Bedrock Codings

Scour Scenarios Scour Critical Code Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No

X X X X X X Ideal field conditions. No active scour or stream stability issues 5

Footing Exposed Only 4

Footing Undermined (evaluate severity, substrate) 4 or 2

Footing Exposed Plus Constriction, Unstable or Attacking (evaluate severity, substrate) 4 or 2

Bridge Constricts Channel > 10% 4

Bridge Constricts Channel > 10% plus Unstable or Attacking (evaluate severity, substrate) 4 or 2

Bridge on Unstable Channel with riprap in good condition, size and quantity. 5

Bridge on Unstable Channel with bank erosion and/or damaged riprap protection 4 or 2

Designed countermeasures installed, stable and performing well. 7

Severe scour, abutment failing 1 or 0

None of the above, Needs further review 6 yes (undermined) yes no no yes (undermined) no no no no no no yes no no no no

Fill in no yes

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2

3200000 Structure No:

Scour Critical Coding, Item 113 Field Evaluation Guide

Is Footing Exposed?

no yes

Parameters

Is Channel Constriction greater than 10%?

no no

Is Flow Attacking?

no no no no no yes

Fill In

Is Stream Laterally or Vertically Unstable?

no no no no

Fill In yes yes

Flood of 2020 washed out BOB approach and changed channel somewhat toward BOB. Center pier footing exposed. Site seemed stable until 2020. No footings undermined.

Fill in

Fill in

1.1650 no no

Fill in

Fill in no no

Bank Erosion no no

Other factors

Structure Name: Date: 8/21/2023 Route: Milepost: 061406000001009

Intermediate Piers Not on Piles or Bedrock Codings

Scour Scenarios Scour Critical Code Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No High Low Yes No

X X X X X X Ideal field conditions. No active scour or stream stability issues 5

Footing Exposed Only 4

Footing Exposed Plus Constriction, Unstable, Attacking, debris potential 2

Bridge Constricts Channel > 10% 5

Bridge Constricts Channel > 10% plus Unstable, Attacking alignment, debris potential (evaluate severity, substrate) 4 or 2

Bridge on Unstable Channel 5

Bridge on Unstable Channel with attacking alignment or debris potential (evaluate severity) 4 or 2

Designed countermeasures installed, stable and performing well. 7

Severe scour, abutment failing 1 or 0

None of the above, Needs further review 6Fill In

36" of 60" deep footing exposed. Pier catches debris. 2020 flooding washed out BOB approach fill.

Scour has been stable since at least 2006 based on photos so not critical.

no yes Fill in yes (undermined) Fill in no no no yes Fill in

Fill in no no yes no low no yes no yes no no low no yes no no no low no

SOUTH FORK UMATILLA #2

3200000 Structure No:

Scour Critical Coding, Item 113 Field Evaluation Guide

Parameters no no no no low no

Is Footing Exposed?

Is Channel Constriction greater than 10%?

Is Stream Laterally or Vertically Unstable?

Is Flow Alignment Attacking? Debris Potential Other factors

1.1650