State of Georgia State Entity: Fort Valley State University Electronic Request for Proposals (“eRFP”) Event Name: Laundry Equipment Lease & Maintenance eRFP (Event) Number: 53300-eRFP-000001695-2026

1. Introduction

1.1. Purpose of Procurement

Pursuant to the State Purchasing Act (Official Code of Georgia Annotated §§50-5-50 et seq.), this electronic Request for Proposals (“eRFP”) is being issued to establish a contract with a qualified supplier who will provide leased commercial grade washers and dryers for the Residential dorms laundry rooms to Fort Valley State University (hereinafter, “the State Entity”) as further described in this eRFP.

Fort Valley State University’s has historically provided laundry facilities with machines equipped with card readers to charge students when they used them. FVSU is moving to a service model allowing students 24/7 access at no additional cost to the students. Supplier will be responsible for keeping machines clean and maintained with minimal downtime.

1.2. eRFP Certification

Pursuant to the provisions of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated §50-5-67(a), the State Entity certifies the use of competitive sealed bidding will not be practicable or advantageous to the State of Georgia in completing the acquisition described in this eRFP. Thus, competitive sealed proposals will be submitted in response to this eRFP. This eRFP is being sourced through an electronic sourcing tool approved by the Department of Administrative Services (“DOAS”) and all suppliers’ responses must be submitted electronically in accordance with the instructions contained in Section 2 “Instructions to Suppliers” of this eRFP. Electronic competitive sealed proposals will be administered pursuant to the Georgia Electronic Records and Signature Act. Please note electronic competitive sealed proposals meet the sealed proposal requirements of the State of Georgia, an electronic record meets any requirements for writing, and an electronic signature meets any requirements for an original signature.

1.3. Overview of the eRFP Process

The objective of the eRFP is to select a qualified supplier to provide the goods and/or services outlined in this eRFP to the State Entity. This eRFP process will be conducted to gather and evaluate responses from suppliers for potential award. All qualified suppliers are invited to participate by submitting responses, as further defined below. After evaluating all suppliers’ responses received prior to the closing date of this eRFP and following negotiations (if any) and resolution of any contract exceptions, the preliminary results of the eRFP process will be publicly announced, including the names of all participating suppliers and the evaluation results. Subject to the protest process, final contract award(s) will be publicly announced thereafter.

NOTE TO SUPPLIERS: The general instructions and provisions of this document have been drafted with the expectation that the State Entity will make a single award; however, please refer to Section 6.7 “Selection and Award” of this eRFP for information concerning the State Entity’s actual award strategy (single, multiple, split awards, etc).

See the GPR/Jaggaer Sourcing Director to the proposed schedule the dates up to the closing date of the eRFP will be publicly posted prior to the closing date of this eRFP. After the close of the eRFP, the State entity shall post a Noitice of Intent to Award.

*In the event the estimated value of the contract is less than $100,000, the State Entity reserves the right to proceed directly to contract award without posting a Notice of Intent to Award.

1.4. Official Issuing Officer (Buyer)

Rebecca (Becky) Horton Hortonr01@fvsu.edu

1.5. Definition of Terms

Please review the following terms:

Supplier(s) – companies desiring to do business with the State of Georgia.

State Entity – the governmental entity identified in Section 1.1 “Purpose of Procurement” of this eRFP.

Any special terms or words which are not identified in this State Entity eRFP Document may be identified separately in one or more attachments to the eRFP. Please download, save and carefully review all documents in accordance with the instructions provided in Section 2 “Instructions to Suppliers” of this eRFP.

1.6. Contract Term

The initial term of the contract(s) shall be from the date of award until the end of the State’s current fiscal year. The goal is to have the contract term begin on 7/1/2026 with fully installed machines. The State’s fiscal year is from July 1st through June 30th. The State Entity shall possess four (4) one (1) year option(s) to renew, which options shall be exercisable at the sole discretion of the State Entity. Renewal will be accomplished through the issuance of Notice of Award Amendment or new annual PO. In the event that the contract(s), if any, resulting from the award of this eRFP shall terminate or be likely to terminate prior to the making of an award for a new contract for the identified products and/or services, the State Entity may, with the written consent of the awarded supplier(s), extend the contract(s) for such period of time as may be necessary to permit the State Entity’s continued supply of the identified products and/or services. The contract(s) may be amended in writing from time to time by mutual consent of the parties. Unless this eRFP states otherwise, the resulting award of the contract(s) does not guarantee volume or a commitment of funds.

2. Instructions to Suppliers By submitting a response to the eRFP, the supplier is acknowledging that the supplier:

1. Has read the information and instructions,

2. Agrees to comply with the information and instructions contained herein.

2.1. General Information and Instructions

2.1.1.

Team Georgia Marketplace™ Registration System

DOAS requires all companies and/or individuals interested in conducting business with the State of Georgia to register in the State’s web-based registration system, through Team Georgia Marketplace™. Registration is free and enables the registering company to gain access to certain information, services and/or materials maintained in Team Georgia Marketplace™ at no charge to the registering company. All registering companies must agree to be bound by the applicable terms and conditions governing the supplier’s use of Team Georgia Marketplace™. In the event DOAS elects to offer certain optional or premium services to registered companies on a fee basis, the registered company will be given the opportunity to either accept or reject the service before incurring any costs and still maintain its registration. Companies may register at https://fscm.teamworks.georgia.gov/psc/supp/SUPPLIER/ERP/c/NUI_FRAMEWORK.PT_LANDINGPAGE.GBL?&

2.1.2.

Restrictions on Communicating with Staff

From the issue date of this eRFP until the final award is announced (or the eRFP is officially cancelled), suppliers are not allowed to communicate for any reason with any State staff except through the Issuing Officer named herein, or during the Bidders/Offerors’ conference (if any), or as defined in this eRFP or as provided by existing work agreement(s). Prohibited communication includes all contact or interaction, including but not limited to telephonic communications, emails, faxes, letters, or personal meetings, such as lunch, entertainment, or otherwise. The State Entity reserves the right to reject the response of any supplier violating this provision.

2.1.3.

Submitting Questions All questions concerning this eRFP must be submitted in writing via email to the Issuing Officer identified in Section 1.5 “Issuing Officer” of this eRFP. No questions other than written will be accepted. No response other than written will be binding upon the State. All suppliers must submit questions by the deadline identified in the Schedule of Events for submitting questions. Suppliers are cautioned that the State Entity may or may not elect to entertain late questions or questions submitted by any other method than as directed by this section. All questions about this eRFP must be submitted in the following format:

Company Name

Question #1 Question, Citation of relevant section of the eRFP Question #2 Question, Citation of relevant section of the eRFP

Do not use the comments section of the Sourcing Event to submit questions to the issuing officer.

2.1.4.

Attending Bidders/Offerors’ Conference A Mandatory pre-Bid meeting is scheduled for 3/24/2026 at 1:30PM in the Wildcat Commons Clubhouse. Because the conference has been identified as mandatory, a representative of the supplier must attend the conference in its entirety to be considered eligible for contract award. The supplier is strongly encouraged to allow ample travel time to ensure arrival in the conference meeting room prior to the beginning of any mandatory conference. The State Entity reserves the right to consider any representative arriving late to be “not in attendance. Therefore, all suppliers are strongly encouraged to arrive early to allow for unexpected travel contingencies.

2.1.5.

State’s Right to Request Additional Information – Supplier’s Responsibility

Prior to contract award, the State Entity must be assured that the selected supplier has all of the resources to successfully perform under the contract. This includes, but is not limited to, adequate number of personnel with required skills, availability of appropriate equipment in sufficient quantity to meet the on-going needs of the State Entity, financial resources sufficient to complete performance under the contract, and experience in similar endeavors. If, during the evaluation process, the State Entity is unable to assure itself of the supplier’s ability to perform, if awarded, the State Entity has the option of requesting from the supplier any information deemed necessary to determine the supplier’s responsibility. If such information is required, the supplier will be so notified and will be permitted approximately seven business days to submit the information requested.

2.1.6.

Failing to Comply with Submission Instructions

Responses received after the identified due date and time or submitted by any other means than those expressly permitted by the eRFP will not be considered. Suppliers’ responses must be complete in all respects, as required in each section of this eRFP.

2.1.7.

Rejection of Proposals; State’s Right to Waive Immaterial Deviation The State Entity reserves the right to reject any or all responses, to waive any irregularity or informality in a supplier’s response, and to accept or reject any item or combination of items, when to do so would be to the advantage of the State of Georgia. It is also within the right of the State Entity to reject responses that do not contain all elements and information requested in this eRFP. A supplier’s response will be rejected if the response contains any defect or irregularity and such defect or irregularity constitutes a material deviation from the eRFP requirements, which determination will be made by the State Entity on a case-by-case basis.

2.1.8.

State’s Right to Amend and/or Cancel the eRFP The State Entity reserves the right to amend this eRFP. Any revisions must be made in writing prior to the eRFP closing date and time. By submitting a response, the supplier shall be deemed to have accepted all terms and agreed to all requirements of the eRFP (including any revisions/additions made in writing prior to the close of the eRFP whether or not such revision occurred prior to the time the supplier submitted its response) unless expressly stated otherwise in the supplier’s response. THEREFORE, EACH SUPPLIER IS INDIVIDUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING THE REVISED eRFP AND MAKING ANY NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE CHANGES AND/OR ADDITIONS TO THE SUPPLIER’S RESPONSE PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE eRFP. Suppliers are encouraged to frequently check the eRFP for additional information. Finally, the State Entity reserves the right to cancel this eRFP at any time.

2.1.9.

Protest Process

Suppliers should familiarize themselves with the procedures set forth in Chapter 6 of the Georgia Procurement Manual.

2.1.10.

Costs for Preparing Responses

Each supplier’s response should be prepared simply and economically, avoiding the use of elaborate promotional materials beyond those sufficient to provide a complete presentation. The cost for developing the response and participating in the procurement process (including the protest process) is the sole responsibility of the supplier. The State will not provide reimbursement for such costs.

2.1.11.

ADA Guidelines The State of Georgia adheres to the guidelines set forth in the Americans with Disabilities Act. Suppliers should contact the Issuing Officer at least one day in advance if they require special arrangements when attending the Bidders/Offerors’ Conference (if any). The Georgia Relay Center at 1-800-255-0056 (TDD Only) or 1-800-255-0135 (Voice) will relay messages, in strict confidence, for the speech and hearing impaired.

2.1.12.

Public Access to Procurement Records Solicitation opportunities will be publicly advertised as required by law and the provisions of the Georgia Procurement Manual. The State Purchasing Act delays the release of certain procurement records in the event the public disclosure of those records prior to the State Entity’s public announcements of the results of a solicitation would undermine the public purpose of obtaining the best value for the State such as cost estimates, proposals/bids, evaluation criteria, supplier evaluations, negotiation documents, offers and counter-offers, and certain records revealing preparation for the procurement. After final contract award has been made or after a bid has been cancelled following evaluation, without intent to rebid, requests for access to supplier proposals and/or communications, shall be subject to the disclosure provisions of Georgia’s Open Records Act. Pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 50-18-71(a), DOAS must make all public records, including bid proposals, open for personal inspection and copying, except those records which by order of a court of this state or by law are specifically exempted from disclosure.

The State Entity is allowed to assess a reasonable charge to defray the cost of reproducing documents. A state employee should be present during the time of onsite inspection of documents. PLEASE NOTE: Even though information (financial or other information) submitted by a supplier may be marked as "confidential", "proprietary", etc., the State will make its own determination regarding what information may or may not be withheld from disclosure.

2.1.12.1 Marking Submissions as “Confidential”, “Proprietary”, or “Trade Secret

If a Supplier considers any portion of the documents, data, or records submitted in response to this solicitation to be exempt from disclosure under Georgia law, the Supplier must clearly mark each such submission, or portions of the submission, considered to be exempt from disclosure as “Confidential,” “Proprietary”, or “Trade Secret.” and specify the statutory exemption. All markings must be conspicuous; use color, bold, underlining, or some other method in order to conspicuously distinguish the mark from the other text. Wholesale designation of a response or substantial parts of a response as “Confidential” will not be accepted by the State. If only portions of a page are subject to some protection, Supplier should not mark the entire page. PLEASE NOTE: Even though information (financial or other information) submitted by a supplier may be marked as "confidential", "proprietary", etc., the State will make its own determination regarding what information may or may not be withheld from disclosure.

2.1.12.2 Submission of Redacted Copies

If Supplier considers any portion of its bid/proposal to the solicitation to be trade secret or otherwise not subject to public disclosure under Georgia Open Records Act, Supplier must, in addition to the required original documents, provide a separate redacted electronic copy of its bid/proposal, in PDF format, and briefly describe in a separate writing, as to each item redacted, the grounds for claiming exemption from the public records law, including citation to the appropriate exemption form disclosure requirements provided under Georgia law. This redacted copy should be clearly marked “Redacted Copy-Available for Public Review.” In addition, the electronic file name should include the words “Redacted Copy” at the beginning of the file name. The redacted copy shall be submitted at the same time Supplier submits its bid/proposal and must only exclude or redact those specific portions that are claimed not subject to disclosure. The redacted copy should reflect the same pagination as the original and show the location from which information was redacted. Except for the redacted information, the redacted electronic copy must be identical to the original bid/proposal. The redacted copy will be open to public inspection under the Georgia Open Records Act without further notice to the Supplier. If Supplier fails to submit a redacted copy with its bid/proposal, the State is authorized to produce the vendor’s bid/proposal with the exception of audited financial statements in answer to any public records request under the Georgia Open Records Act. Even though information submitted by a Supplier may be marked as "confidential", "proprietary", “trade secret” etc., the State will make its own determination regarding what information may or may not be withheld from disclosure. If the State of Georgia deems redacted information to be subject to disclosure under the Georgia Open Records Act, the Supplier will be contacted prior to the release of this information.

2.1.12.3 Trade Secret In addition, if the Supplier claims that certain information in its bid/proposal may be withheld as trade secret pursuant to O.C.G.A. 50-18-72(a)(34), the Supplier shall include with its bid/proposal submission, an affidavit indicating the specific information that the Supplier identifies as trade secret, affirmatively declaring that such information is trade secret. Along with the affidavit, the Supplier shall provide a justification regarding how and why each redaction request constitutes a trade secret pursuant to Georgia Law. Designation of a “trade secret” shall not be binding on the State, but the State will review and consider the designation. If the Supplier does not include an affidavit with its bid/proposal submission, the State is authorized to produce the vendor’s bid/proposal with the exception of audited financial statements in answer to any public records request under the Georgia Open Records Act. Wholesale designation of a response or substantial parts of a response as “trade secrets” will not be accepted by the State. In general, the State does not consider pricing information to be trade secret. See State Rd. & Tollway Auth. V. Elec. Transaction Consultants Corp. 306 Ga. App. 487; 702 S.E. 2d 486 (2010).

2.1.13.

Registered Lobbyists By submitting a response to this eRFP, the supplier hereby certifies that the supplier and its lobbyists are in compliance with the Lobbyist Registration Requirements in accordance with the Georgia Procurement Manual.

2.2. Submittal Instructions

The full package with the listed attachments must be sent electronically to the University Procurement Officer as noted in the instructions. Rebecca Horton - Hortonr01@fvsu.edu

2. General Business Requirements

This section contains general business requirements. By submitting a response, the supplier is certifying its agreement to comply with all of the identified requirements of this section and that all costs for complying with these general business requirements are included in the supplier’s submitted pricing.

3.1.

Standard Insurance Requirements If awarded a contract, the supplier shall procure and maintain insurance which shall protect the supplier and the State of Georgia (as an additional insured) from any claims for bodily injury, property damage, or personal injury covered by the indemnification obligations set forth in the contract attached to this solicitation throughout the duration of the contract. The supplier shall procure and maintain the insurance policies described below at the supplier’s own expense and shall furnish the State Entity an insurance certificate listing the State of Georgia as certificate holder and as an additional insured. The insurance certificate must document that the Commercial General Liability insurance coverage purchased by the supplier includes contractual liability coverage applicable to the contract. In addition, the insurance certificate must provide the following information: the name and address of the insured; name, address, telephone number and signature of the authorized agent; name of the insurance company (authorized to operate in Georgia); a description of coverage in detailed standard terminology (including policy period, policy number, limits of liability, exclusions and endorsements); and an acknowledgment of notice of cancellation to the State Entity.

The supplier is required to maintain the following insurance coverage’s during the term of the contract:

1) Workers Compensation Insurance (Occurrence) in the amounts of the statutory limits established by the General Assembly of the State of Georgia (A self-insurer must submit a certificate from the Georgia Board of Workers Compensation stating that the supplier qualifies to pay its own workers compensation claims.) In addition, the supplier shall require all subcontractors occupying the premises or performing work under the contract to obtain an insurance certificate showing proof of Workers Compensation Coverage with the following minimum coverage:

Bodily injury by accident - per employee

$100,000;

Bodily injury by disease - per employee

$100,000;

Bodily injury by disease – policy limit

$500,000.

2) Commercial General Liability Policy with the following minimum coverage:

Each Occurrence Limit $1,000,000 Personal & Advertising Injury Limit $1,000,000

General Aggregate Limit

$ 2,000,000

Products/Completed Ops. Aggregate Limit $ 2,000,000

3) Automobile Liability

Combined Single Limit

$1,000,000

The foregoing policies shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies will not be canceled, or not renewed or allowed to lapse for any reason until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the State Entity. Certificates of Insurance showing such coverage to be in force shall be filed with the State Entity prior to commencement of any work under the contract. The foregoing policies shall be obtained from insurance companies licensed to do business in Georgia and shall be with companies acceptable to the State Entity, which must have a minimum A.M. Best rating of A-. All such coverage shall remain in full force and effect during the term and any renewal or extension thereof.

Within ten (10) business days of award, the awarded supplier must procure the required insurance and provide the State Entity with two (2) Certificates of Insurance. Certificates must reference the contract number. The supplier’s submitted pricing must include the cost of the required insurance. No contract performance shall occur unless and until the required insurance certificates are provided.

3.2.

Bonds and/or Letter of Credit Performance Bond/Letter of Credit The awarded supplier(s) shall be required to furnish a performance bond or an irrevocable letter of credit to the State Entity for the faithful performance on the contract in an amount equal to 5%. The bond shall be issued by a Corporate Surety authorized to do business with the State of Georgia. The performance bond/letter of credit must be submitted to the State Entity within ten (10) calendar days of the date the contract is awarded, but in any event, prior to the beginning of any contract performance by the awarded supplier.

Payment Bond

The awarded supplier(s) shall be required to furnish a bond to secure payment of all claims for materials furnished and/or labor performed by a subcontractor in the event one or more subcontractors are utilized by the awarded supplier in performance of the project. The payment bond shall be in amount equal to the contract price for the portion of work and/or materials to be performed/provided by the subcontractor(s). The awarded supplier(s) must (1) receive prior approval from the State Entity prior to utilizing the subcontractor and (2) submit the payment bond(s) to the State Entity prior to permitting the approved subcontractor(s) to begin work.

1.3. Proposal Certification

By responding to this solicitation, the supplier understands and agrees to the following:

1. That this electronically submitted proposal constitutes an offer, which when accepted in writing by the State Entity, and subject to the terms and conditions of such acceptance, will constitute a valid and binding contract between the supplier and the State Entity; and

2. That the supplier guarantees and certifies that all items included in the supplier’s response meet or exceed any and all of the solicitation’s identified specifications and requirements except as expressly stated otherwise in the supplier’s response; and

3. That the response submitted by the supplier shall be valid and held open for a period of one hundred and twenty (120) days from the final solicitation closing date and that the supplier’s offer may be held open for a lengthier period of time subject to the supplier’s consent; and

4. That the supplier’s response is made without prior understanding, agreement, or connection with any corporation, firm, or person submitting a response for the same materials, supplies, equipment, or services and is in all respects fair and without collusion or fraud. Supplier understands and agrees that collusive bidding is a violation of state and federal law and can result in fines, prison sentences, and civil damage awards; and

5. That the provisions of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Sections 45-10-20 et seq. have not been violated and will not be violated in any respect.

3. eRFP Proposal (Bid) Factors This section contains the detailed technical requirements and related services for this Sourcing Event. Suppliers are required to download, complete and then upload the Worksheets titled “Supplier General Information”, “Mandatory Response Worksheet”, “Mandatory Scored Requirement Worksheet” and “Additional Scored Response Worksheet” found as attachments in the Sourcing Event. Although many solicitations will contain all of the worksheets noted above, it is possible that a solicitation will not contain all of the worksheets. In the event all four worksheets are not available as downloadable forms to this eRFP, please confirm with the Issuing Officer that all four worksheets are not required.

Unless requested otherwise, all responses must be provided within the Excel worksheets and not as a separately attached document. Except as otherwise indicated, all requested forms and documents must be submitted electronically via the sourcing tool as an uploaded document to the supplier’s response. These worksheets together with any and all other documents submitted in response to Section 4 of this eRFP will be considered the supplier’s technical proposal. If files are requested, please be sure to use the file name requested.

The State Entity has determined that it is best to define its own needs, desired operating objectives, and desired operating environment. The State Entity will not tailor these needs to fit particular solutions suppliers may have available; rather, the suppliers shall propose to meet the State Entity’s needs as defined in this eRFP. All claims shall be subject to demonstration. Suppliers are cautioned that conditional proposals, based upon assumptions, may be deemed non-responsive.

4.1.

Technical Proposal Introduction All of the items described in this section are service levels and/or terms and conditions that the State Entity expects to be satisfied by the selected supplier. Each supplier must indicate its willingness and ability to satisfy these requirements in the appropriate worksheets.

4.2.

Supplier General Information

Each supplier must complete all of the requested information in the electronic purchasing system entitled Supplier’s General Information Worksheet for inclusion with their bid response.

DO NOT INCLUDE ANY COST/PRICING INFORMATION IN YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS WORKSHEET.

4.3.

Mandatory Requirements As specified with each requirement listed in the Mandatory Response Worksheet, the supplier must indicate whether its proposal meets the individual requirements by marking either a "YES" or "NO" in the response block provided. A Pass/Fail evaluation will be utilized for all mandatory requirements. Ordinarily, to be considered responsive, responsible and eligible for award, all questions identified as mandatory must be marked “YES” to pass. There may be rare instances in which a response of “NO” is the correct and logical response in order to meet the mandatory requirement (e.g. responding “NO” that the supplier does not possess any conflicts of interest). Otherwise, any mandatory questions marked "NO" will fail the technical requirements and will result in disqualification of the proposal.

DO NOT INCLUDE ANY COST/PRICING INFORMATION IN YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS WORKSHEET.

4.4.

Mandatory Scored Response As specified with each requirement listed in the Mandatory Scored Response Worksheet, the supplier must indicate whether it will meet the individual requirement (if any) and provide a supporting narrative in the space provided. To be considered responsive, responsible and eligible for award, any and all requirements identified in the Mandatory Scored Response Worksheet must be met. There may be rare instances in which an item within the Mandatory Scored Response Worksheet does not create an individual requirement which must be met, but, instead, merely requires a response. All requirements labeled “Mandatory Scored” must be met by the supplier. Failure to meet any mandatory scored requirements may result in disqualification of the proposals. The narrative description, along with any required supporting materials, will be evaluated and awarded points in accordance with Section 6 “Proposal Evaluation, Negotiations and Award” of this eRFP.

DO NOT INCLUDE ANY COST INFORMATION IN YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS WORKSHEET.

4.5.

Additional Scored Responses – Not Applicable All items labeled “Additional Scored Responses” represent information that is requested by the State Entity. Suppliers are encouraged to provide a thorough narrative description in the space provided in the Additional Scored Response Worksheet. Answers along with any requested supporting materials will be evaluated and awarded points in accordance with Section 6 “Proposal Evaluation, Negotiations and Award” of this eRFP.

DO NOT INCLUDE ANY COST INFORMATION IN YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS WORKSHEET.

4.6.

Additional Information As noted in Section 2.2.2 “eRFP Review”, please access and review all of the attachments provided by the State Entity within the Event. If supplemental materials are requested by the State Entity to be submitted by the supplier as part of the technical proposal, the supplier should upload these additional materials as noted in Section 2.2.4 “Uploading Forms”.

5.

Cost Proposal 5.1.

Cost Proposal

Each supplier is required to submit a cost proposal as part of its response. The cost proposal will be evaluated and scored in accordance with Section 6 “Proposal Evaluation, Negotiations and Award” of this eRFP. By submitting a response, the supplier agrees that it has read, understood, and will abide by the following instructions/rules:

1. The submitted cost proposal must include all costs of performing pursuant to the resulting contract; and

2. Cost proposals containing a minimum order/ship quantity or dollar value, unless otherwise called for in the eRFP, will be treated as non-responsive and may not be considered for award; and

3. In the event there is discrepancy between the supplier’s unit price and extended price, the unit price shall govern;

4. In the event there is a discrepancy between (1) the supplier’s pricing as quoted on the eRFP’s provided cost worksheet and (2) the supplier’s pricing as quoted by the supplier in one or more additional documents, the former shall govern; and

5. The prices quoted and listed in the cost proposal shall be firm throughout the term of the resulting contract, unless otherwise noted in the eRFP or contract.

5.2.

Cost Structure and Additional Instructions The State Entity’s intent is to structure the cost format in order to facilitate comparison among all suppliers and foster competition to obtain the best market pricing. Consequently, the State Entity requires that each supplier’s cost be in the format outlined below. Additional alternative cost structures will not be considered. Each supplier is cautioned that failure to comply with the instructions listed below, submission of an incomplete offer, or submission of an offer in a different format than the one requested may result in the rejection of the supplier’s proposal.

Enter all information directly into the cost sheet(s). Enter numbers on each cost sheet in “number” (two-place decimal), not “currency” or other format unless otherwise stated. That is, omit dollar signs, commas, and any other non-essential symbols. (e.g., $7.90 should be entered as 7.90) Prices must be in US Dollars. Enter “n/a” to indicate not available or “0” if there is no charge. Cells left blank will be interpreted as “no offer”.

Download the cost worksheet, complete the worksheet and then upload the worksheet by following the instructions in the third bullet of Section 2.2.4 “Uploading Forms” of this eRFP.

6.

Proposal Evaluation, Negotiations and Award All timely proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the following steps. The objective of the evaluation process is to identify the proposal which represents the best value to the State Entity based on a combination of technical and cost factors. Based on the results of the initial evaluation, the State Entity may or may not elect to negotiate technical and/or cost factors as further described in the eRFP. In the event negotiations of the technical and/or cost factors occur, the revised proposals will be reevaluated in accordance with the provisions of Section 6.4 “Scoring Criteria” of this eRFP. Once the evaluation process has been completed (and any negotiations the State Entity desires to conduct have occurred), the apparent successful supplier(s) will be required to enter into discussions with the State Entity to resolve any exceptions to the State Entity’s contract. The State Entity will announce the results of the eRFP as described further in Section 6.9 “Public Award Announcement” of this eRFP.

6.1.

Administrative/Preliminary Review First, the proposals will be reviewed by the Issuing Officer to determine the proposal’s compliance with the following requirements:

1.

Proposal was submitted by deadline in accordance with Section 2 2.

Proposal is complete and contains all required documents

3.

Technical Proposal does not include any pricing from the Cost Proposal 6.2.

Evaluating Proposal Factors (Section 4)

If the supplier’s proposal passes the Administrative/Preliminary Review, the supplier’s responses to Section 4 “eRFP Proposal Factors” will be submitted to the Evaluation Team for evaluation.

6.2.1.

Review of Mandatory and Mandatory Scored Questions

The Evaluation Team will review each proposal in detail to determine its compliance with mandatory eRFP requirements. Responses to both “Mandatory” and “Mandatory Scored” Questions will be evaluated on a pass/fail basis. If a proposal fails to meet a mandatory and/or mandatory scored eRFP requirement, the State Entity will determine if the deviation is material. A material deviation will be cause for rejection of the proposal. An immaterial deviation will be processed as if no deviation had occurred. All proposals which meet the requirements of the “Mandatory” and “Mandatory Scored” Questions are considered “Responsive Proposals” at this point in time and will be scored in accordance with the point allocation in Section 6.4 “Scoring Criteria” of this eRFP.

6.2.2.

Review of Additional Scored Information Questions

For all proposals determined to be “Responsive Proposals”, the Evaluation Team will review and score the responses to the Additional Scored Information (if any) in accordance with the point allocation in Section 6.4 “Scoring Criteria” of this eRFP.

The supplier will receive a total technical score at the conclusion of the evaluation of the eRFP Proposal Factors.

6.3.

Evaluating Cost Proposal and Total Combined Score

The cost proposals will be reviewed and scored in accordance with Section 6.4 “Scoring Criteria.” To expedite the evaluation process, the State Entity reserves the right to analyze the cost proposals independently, but at the same time the Evaluation Team is analyzing the technical proposals, provided neither the cost proposals nor the cost analysis is disclosed to the Evaluation Team until the Evaluation Team completes its initial evaluation and scoring of the eRFP Proposal Factors.

6.3.1.

Cost Scoring

The State Entity may utilize lowest cost, lowest total cost, and total cost of ownership (TCO) or greatest savings to determine the most competitive cost proposal. The cost proposal may be scored on an overall basis or at the category/subcategory/line level (as applicable) relative to other proposals. The supplier deemed to have the most competitive cost proposal overall, as determined by the State Entity, will receive the maximum weighted score for the cost criteria. In the alternative, in the event the cost proposal is scored at the category, subcategory or line level, the State Entity may assign the maximum score per category/subcategory/line for the most competitive proposal at that level. Other proposals will receive a percentage of the weighted score based on the percentage differential between the most competitive cost proposal and the specific proposal in question.

6.3.2. Georgia Enterprises for Products and Services (GEPS)

In the event the issuing officer has received a response from GEPS, the issuing officer must factor in a price preference of 8% for purposes of cost evaluation. The price preference of 8% has been approved by DOAS in accordance with the State Use Law set forth at O.C.G.A. 50-5-135 et seq., which is intended to create opportunities for disabled persons employed by community-based rehabilitation programs and training centers that are certified by the State Use Council. To implement the price preference, the issuing officer must lower GEPS’ price by 8% when comparing GEPS’ price with any other supplier’s response. However, in the event GEPS wins the contract award, GEPS must be paid at its actual bid price.

6.3.3. Total Score

The supplier’s cost score will be combined with the supplier’s technical score to determine the supplier’s overall score (or “total combined score”).

6.4.

Scoring Criteria

The evaluation is comprised of the following:

6.5.

Georgia Based Business/Reciprocal Preference Law O.C.G.A. §50-5-60(b)

For the purposes of evaluation only, suppliers resident in the State of Georgia will be granted the same preference over suppliers resident in another state in the same manner, on the same basis, and to the same extent that preference is granted in awarding bids for the same goods or services by such other state to suppliers resident therein over suppliers resident in the State of Georgia. NOTE: For the purposes of this law, the definition of a resident supplier is a supplier who is domiciled in the State of Georgia.

6.6.

Negotiations of Proposals and/or Cost Factors DOAS possesses discretionary authority to conduct one or more rounds of negotiations of technical proposal and/or cost factors as permitted by Georgia law and DOAS’ established procurement policy. This section of the eRFP describes DOAS’ process for utilizing its discretionary negotiation authority as defined by O.C.G.A. Section 50-5-67(a)(6). No state entity is permitted to conduct negotiations of proposal and/or cost factors without DOAS’ supervision unless DOAS has expressly authorized the state entity to conduct negotiations on its own. Although this section addresses DOAS’ right to negotiate in accordance with O.C.G.A. §50-5-67(a)(6), DOAS/State Entity reserves the right to conduct any other negotiations authorized by law.

The objective of negotiations is to obtain the supplier’s best terms. PLEASE NOTE: NEGOTIATIONS ARE DISCRETIONARY; THEREFORE, THE STATE ENTITY URGES THE SUPPLIER (1) TO SUBMIT ITS BEST RESPONSE AND (2) NOT TO ASSUME THE SUPPLIER WILL BE GRANTED AN OPPORTUNITY TO NEGOTIATE.

6.6.1.

Overview of Negotiations

After the Evaluation Team has scored the suppliers’ proposals, the State Entity may elect to enter into one or more rounds of negotiations with all responsive and responsible suppliers or only those suppliers identified by the Evaluation Team as being in the competitive range. The competitive range will not be selected arbitrarily, and those suppliers included in the competitive range must have highly scored proposals.

After each round of negotiations (if any), the supplier will submit revisions to its proposal factors and/or cost proposal, which revisions will be scored by the Evaluation Team in accordance with the same criteria used to evaluate the initial responses from the suppliers. Suppliers may be removed from further participation in the negotiation process in the event the Evaluation Team determines the supplier cannot be considered responsive and responsible or based on the competitive range as defined in Section 6.6.3 “Competitive Range.”

The State Entity reserves the right to proceed to award without further discussions after receipt of the initial proposals, in which case, negotiations and Proposal Revisions will not be required.

6.6.2.

Negotiation Instructions Listed below are the key action items related to negotiations. The State’s Negotiation Committee may consist of the State’s Evaluation Committee or may be comprised of different people. However, evaluation of proposals or revised proposals shall be completed only by the State’s Evaluation Committee.

1.

Negotiation Invitation: Those suppliers identified by the Evaluation Committee to negotiate will be notified and invited to attend negotiations. Suppliers will be notified in writing: (i) the general purpose and scope of the negotiations; (ii) the anticipated schedule for the negotiations; and (iii) the procedures to be followed for negotiations.

2.

Confirmation of Attendance: Suppliers who have been invited to participate in negotiations must confirm attendance.

3.

Negotiations Round(s): One or more rounds of negotiations may be conducted with those suppliers identified by the State’s Evaluation Team.

6.6.3.

Competitive Range If the State Entity elects to negotiate pursuant to Section 6.6, the State Entity may either (1) elect to negotiate with all responsive and responsible suppliers, (2) limit negotiations to those suppliers identified within the competitive range, or (3) limit negotiations to the number of suppliers with whom the State Entity may reasonably negotiate as defined below. In the event the State Entity elects to limit negotiations to those suppliers identified within the competitive range, the State Entity will identify the competitive range by (1) ranking suppliers’ proposals from highest to lowest based on each supplier’s Total Combined Score and (2) then looking for breaks in the scores such that natural groupings of similar scores may be identified. In the event the State Entity determines the number of responsive and responsible suppliers is so great that the State Entity cannot reasonably conduct negotiations (which determination shall be solely at the State Entity’s discretion and shall be conclusive), the State Entity may elect to limit negotiations to the top three (3) ranked suppliers as determined by the Total Combined Score.

6.6.4.

Negotiation Round Completion As part of each round of negotiation, the State Entity may or may not engage in verbal discussions with the suppliers. However, whether or not the State Entity engages in verbal discussions, any revisions the supplier elects to make to its response must be submitted in writing via email by the end date and time identified by the Issuing Officer. All revisions received by the due date and time will be evaluated and re-scored by the Evaluation Team in accordance with the same criteria used to evaluate the initial responses from the suppliers. Revisions which are not received prior to the due date and time cannot be considered; however, any supplier failing to submit timely revisions will not be disqualified from consideration for award based on its final proposal as accepted by the State Entity.

6.7.

Selection and Award The responsive and responsible supplier receiving the highest Total Combined Score and with whom the State Entity is able to reach agreement as to contract terms will be selected for award.

6.8.

Site Visits and Oral Presentations The State Entity reserves the right to conduct site visits or to invite suppliers to present their proposal factors/technical solutions to the Evaluation Team. Cost proposals and related cost information must not be discussed during the oral presentation of the supplier’s technical solution. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the Negotiation Team from discussing both proposal factors and cost information during the negotiation process defined by Section 6.6 “Negotiations of Proposals and/or Cost Factors”.

6.9.

Public Award Announcement

The preliminary results of the evaluation will be announced through the public posting of a Notice of Intent to Award (in the event the value of the contract(s) is estimated to be $100,000 or more in the first year) to the Georgia Procurement Registry. The Notice of Intent to Award (“NOIA”) is not notice of an actual contract award; instead, the NOIA is notice of the State Entity’s expected contract award(s) pending resolution of the protest process. The NOIA (if any) will identify the apparent successful supplier(s), unsuccessful supplier(s), and the reasons why any unsuccessful suppliers were not selected for contract award. NO SUPPLIER SHOULD ASSUME PERSONAL NOTICE OF THE NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD (“NOIA”) WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE STATE ENTITY. INSTEAD, ALL SUPPLIERS SHOULD FREQUENTLY CHECK THE GEORGIA PROCUREMENT REGISTRY FOR NOTICE OF THE NOIA.

The Notice of Award (“NOA”) is the State Entity’s public notice of actual contract award(s). The NOA will be publicly posted to the Georgia Procurement Registry.

7.

Contract Terms and Conditions The contract that the State Entity expects to award as a result of this eRFP will be based upon the eRFP, the successful supplier’s final response as accepted by the State Entity and the contract terms and conditions, which terms and conditions can be downloaded from the Sourcing Event. The “successful supplier’s final response as accepted by the State Entity” shall mean: the final cost and technical proposals submitted by the awarded supplier and any subsequent revisions to the awarded supplier’s cost and technical proposals and the contract terms and conditions due to negotiations, written clarifications or changes made in accordance with the provisions of the eRFP, and any other terms deemed necessary by the State Entity, except that no objection or amendment by the supplier to the eRFP requirements or the contract terms and conditions shall be incorporated by reference into the contract unless the State Entity has explicitly accepted the supplier’s objection or amendment in writing.

Please review the State Entity’s contract terms and conditions prior to submitting a response to this eRFP. Suppliers should plan on the contract terms and conditions contained in this eRFP being included in any award as a result of this eRFP. Therefore, all costs associated with complying with these requirements should be included in any pricing quoted by the suppliers. The contract terms and conditions may be supplemented or revised before contract execution and are provided to enable suppliers to better evaluate the costs associated with the eRFP and the potential resulting contract.

Exception to Contract

By submitting a proposal, each supplier acknowledges its acceptance of the eRFP specifications and the contract terms and conditions without change except as otherwise expressly stated in the submitted proposal. If a supplier takes exception to a contract provision, the supplier must state the reason for the exception and state the specific contract language it proposes to include in place of the provision. Any exceptions to the contract must be uploaded and submitted as an attachment to the supplier’s response. Proposed exceptions must not conflict with or attempt to preempt mandatory requirements specified in the eRFP. Proposed exceptions should be in compliance with Georgia law. For further information regarding contracting with entities subject to DOAS purview please see SPD-SP060 “Contracting with State Entities” provided as an attachment to this solicitation and located at http://doas.ga.gov/state-purchasing/seven-stages-of-procurement/stage-3-solicitation-preparation#.

In the event the supplier is selected for potential award, the supplier will be required to enter into discussions with the State Entity to resolve any contractual differences before an award is made. These discussions are to be finalized and all exceptions resolved within the period of time identified in the schedule of events.