Amendment__08.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Attachment 9

Solicitation SP7000-13-R-1026 SMCP

Response to Question Set 6

1. Question:

Please clarify what DLA is looking for with respect to Individual parts CLIN items 19, 39, 60, 83, 116, 139, 166, 189, 214, 229, 246, 265, 294, 313, 336 and 355:

Is DLA looking for sum of all the wearable and non-wearable parts or a Not to Exceed Amount? The intent of the Individual Parts CLIN in previous contracts was simply to allow the customer to procure parts on an as needed basis as a result of a registered Navy technician or contractor technician troubleshooting a machine during a service call or routine maintenance.

Answer:

Please provide what is being requested in Amendment 5.

2. Question:

How does DLA anticipate using this price list as part of the evaluation process since many of the non-wearable parts may never be ordered over the life of the product?

Answer:

Only those common wearable/consumable parts that are common between vendors will be evaluated by DLA Document Services. We will make that determination when we have reviewed all proposals.

DLA Document Services will evaluate proposal in a fair and honest manner, but we must have proposals to evaluate.

3. Question:

Is it DLA’s intent to consider all wearable and non-wearable parts into the TCO evaluation or only those wearable items such as fusers and drums? Evaluating all parts could inappropriately skew the results and significantly impact the TCO and contract value due to several factors. For the non-wearable parts, there is not an accurate method for determining which individual parts may or may not need replacement during the life of the machine.

Answer:

No, See Answer #2

4. Question:

Secondly, modifications are made to individual parts as a result of manufacturing improvements. There is also a high probability that during the initial five-year period that there will be changes and enhancements to the machine models used to fulfill each class of equipment.

Answer:

Pricing for individual parts will be fixed during the life of the contract based on the parts price list we've requested. Modifications made by the manufacture to parts over the course of the contract will not be chargeable to the government.

April 17 2012 Shipboard Questions and Answers

5450 CARLISLE PK

BLDG 09

MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055-0788

- Incorporate Attachment 9 - Response to Questions

Summary:

Response to question received is hereby incorporated into this Solicitation. Responses can be found on Attachment 9 of this amendment.