Amendment__04.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Attachment 6

Solicitation SP7000-13-R-1026 SMCP

Responses to Questions Set 3

1. On a previous question # 69 on Section 18: Minimum requirements for Print Shop, Color Production Printer, request modification to 220VAC to allow for true digital press technology.

The answer given was: Requirements firm due to available power at the device installation location. Re-engineering power for all ships would be cost prohibited. – However on previous contracts the power requirements were for this unit to be 220 VAC and on the last requirement was 110 or 220VAC. Since 220VAC is provided by (2) 110VAC power lines and (1) ground line and if the current units in place are 110VAC they would have accessed one of the 110VAC lines to ground to get the needed power. Is it the government statement that the second 110VAC line was removed from the ships which would have been “Re-engineering power for all ships would be cost prohibited” at that time? It is my thought that the second 110VAC line is still in place and would require no more work to reconnect than the change from 220 to 110VAC was when that effort was made for the current vendor. Please clarify this response.

ANSWER: In this Solicitation the Navy has stated for the Color Production Printer: “Digital Press technology is not required and the cost to install 220VAC power at those locations would be prohibitive.” The requirements stand as per the Navy’s request.

2. Previous Solicitations for non-scheduled maintenance calls asked for quotes in terms of hours in 2, 4, 6 & 8 increments, this RFQ asks for quotes in only 1 hour rates. Is this referring to the time spent on board the ship from time of arrival to time of departure or does it refer to the length of the response time to the arrival at the ship?

ANSWER: That is incorrect. The previous RFI CLINS asked for quotes in terms of hours in 2, 4, 6 & 8 increments. The Solicitation never included these choices. 8.2 states: “If in CONUS Port hours to be charged are from the time of arrival until departure”. 8.3 states: “Hours for service calls shall be computed from the time the technician arrives at point of U.S. Navy embarkation until the technician completes the repair(s) and is returned to the point of his/her original U.S.

Navy embarkation point”.

3. Individual parts – Is this meant to be parts that are not part of routine maintenance or normally expected failure items such as a broken exterior cover panels or a broken document platen glass?

ANSWER: Any part not covered under the repair kit or under a separate CLIN.

5450 CARLISLE PK

BLDG 09

MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055-0788

This amendment is to: Incorporate Attachment 6 - Responses to Questions Set 3

Summary of Changes:

Responses to additional questions received are hereby incorporated into this Solicitation. Answers can be found on Attachment 6 of this amendment.