Att 1 - Questions and Answers 0005.docx
DOCX document 42 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Distribution and Warehousing Services at DLA Distribution Cherry Point, NC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SP3300-24-R-5003
- Issued by
- Defense Logistics Agency Distribution
About this file
This document is a set of Questions and Answers (Q&A) related to Amendment 0005 of Solicitation SP3300-24-R-5003 for Distribution and Warehousing Services at DLA Distribution Cherry Point, NC.
The key details are:
- The solicitation requires offerors to submit four (4) separate electronic files, including E-File IV for the Cost Proposal Narrative and E-File V for the Cost Proposal Tables. There was some previous confusion around the submission requirements, but this has been clarified in Amendment 0004.
- CDRL A041, which required a staffing matrix, has been removed from the solicitation as part of Amendment 0004.
- The retail stow workload requirement has been removed in Amendment 0005. Retail APLs will still apply to the service provider.
- The experience requirement for the Warehouse Specialist Supervisor position has been corrected in Amendment 0005.
- The base year (9 months) workload projections in TE 5.2 are confirmed as accurate, and will be analyzed and adjusted as necessary for each subsequent performance year.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Distribution and Warehousing Services at DLA Distribution Cherry Point, NC has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SP3300-24-R-5003
Amendment 0005 Attachment 1: Questions and Answers
| Question |
| RFP Page OR |
Pre-Proposal Conference OR Site Visit/GFP/GFE Review/Inspection
| RFP Para Reference (if question relates to the RFP) |
| Government Response |
| 1 |
| Page 66: 4. E-File Format: E-Files I, II, III, and IV may be submitted in Adobe PDF or Microsoft Word. E-File IV cost tables shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel, as detailed in the E-File IV - Cost Proposal Instructions. |
Page 67: 9. b. Offerors shall submit four (4) separate electronic files as shown in the table above.
Page 70: Tab 4 ACCOUNTING SYSTEM VERIFICATION, in the middle of the paragraph states: Additionally, the Offeror shall provide a narrative in the price proposal describing its accounting system in sufficient detail to demonstrate it is acceptable to support the non-fixed-price CLINs on the resultant contract. The Offeror shall provide contact information (physical address, e-mail address, phone and fax numbers) for their local DCAA Office or the independent audit firm to allow the Government evaluators to verify the Offeror’s accounting system meets the Government's requirements.
Questions:
Could the government please clarify the conflicting submission requirements for E-FILE IV? Are there 2 files for E-FILE IV … one file with a narrative (Word or PDF) and one file in XLS?
Could the government clarify if you want 5 total files submitted as the instructions seem to infer?
| Amendment 0004 |
| Revised Section L, Pages 66, 67 and 70 |
Section L has been revised to add E-File V for the Cost Proposal Tables and specify E-File IV as the Cost Proposal Narrative. Please refer to the tracked changes solicitation included with Amendment 0005.
| 2 |
| Page 66: Table, E-FILE I, Tab 2 Section B (Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs) |
Page 66: 9. c. There shall be no cost information in any electronic file other than File IV.
Question: Could the government please clarify these conflicting statements? Cost information must be presented in E-FILE I as noted in the instructions for it.
| Amendment 0004 |
| Revised Section L, |
Revised Section L, page 67, to specify: Aside from completing E-File I, Tab 2, Section B, there shall be no cost information in any electronic files other than E-File IV and E-File V. Please refer to the tracked changes solicitation included with Amendment 0005.
| 3 |
| Request clarification on response to question 52 as it relates to a staffing matrix. |
CDRL A041 has been stricken from the solicitation as part of Amendment 0004.
Is there still a requirement to submit a staffing matrix post award?
Amendment 4 Q&A
| CDRL A041 |
| Not at this time. |
| 4 |
| Follow up on Answer to 73. TE 5.2 Projected Workload lists retail stow workload. |
J.2. states that the Government performs all stow actions in retail.
Will the SP perform retail stow workload?
| Amendment 4 Q&A |
| TE 5.2 DDCM Projected TE C-5.3.1 Stow of receipts |
| Updated TE 5.2 with Amendment 0005 to remove this requirement. |
| 5 |
| Follow up on Answer 83 & the answer to 73. |
Will retail APLs apply to the SP?
| Amendment 4 Q&A |
| TE 5.0 Retail sections 5.7.2N, 5.4N, and 5.7.2N |
| APLs listed in TE 5.0 are applicable to the SP. |
| 6 |
| Follow up question to Q&A number 94. |
J.1. states the Warehouse Specialist Supervisor requires “…a minimum three (3) years of experience in “transportation” using WMS or equivalent automated WMS within the past five (5) years.”
What is the Government’s experience requirement for the Warehouse Specialist Supervisor?
L.1 PWS Page C-15
And Amendment 4 Q&A
| J.1 C-1.3.1 Para C, sub-section 7 |
| This has been corrected with Amendment 0005. |
| 7 |
| Based on our analysis of PP1 (base year) the workload appears inflated as compared with option periods 1-4. |
Is the base year workload correct?
| Amend 4 – TE 5.2 |
| TE 5.2 – base year (9 months workload) |
| Yes, this is correct. Prior to the start of each performance year, actual workload is analyzed to determine the next performance year projections and the TE 5.2 will adjust at that time if necessary. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .