SOW OPTION 4 Non Resident Chambers 233 Pre-Renovation ACM and LBP Sampling Report 2021 03 17 (1).pdf

REPORT OF LIMITED

PRE-RENOVATION

ASBESTOS CONTAINING

MATERIAL SURVEY AND LEAD

BASED PAINT SURVEY

Tuttle Building – Suite 233 Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia

PREPARED FOR:

Houser Walker Architecture

1819 Peachtree Road, NE.

Suite 102

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

NOVA Project Number: 3020073

September 1, 2020

P R O F E S S I O N A L | P R A C T I C A L | P R O V E N

3 9 0 0 K e n n e s a w 7 5 P a r k w a y , S u i t e 1 0 0 , K e n n e s a w , G e o r g i a 3 0 1 4 4 t . 7 7 0 . 4 2 5 . 0 7 7 7 / f . 7 7 0 . 4 2 5 . 1 1 1 3 / u s a n o v a . c o m

September 1, 2020

HOUSER WALKER ARCHITECTURE

1819 Peachtree Road, NE

Suite 102

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

Attention: Mr. Frank M. Houser, III

Principal

Subject: Report of Limited Pre-Renovation Asbestos Containing Material and Lead Based Paint Survey

TUTTLE BUILDING – SUITE 233

Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia

NOVA Project Number 3020073

Dear Mr. Houser:

NOVA Engineering and Environmental, LLC (NOVA) has completed the Limited Pre-Renovation

Asbestos Containing Material and Lead Based Paint Survey for Suite 233 located at the Tuttle

Building in Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia. We appreciate your selection of NOVA and for the opportunity to be of service on this project. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance.

Sincerely, NOVA Engineering and Environmental, Inc.

Curtis Moses Nickolaus DaSantos

Staff Professional Business Unit Manager

Environmental Services Environmental Services

AHERA No. 17943 EPA Lead Inspector No. 1892

EPA Lead Inspector No. 1876

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SUMMARY

1.1 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

1.2 LEAD BASED PAINT & LEAD CONTAINING PAINT

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY

2.2 PURPOSE

2.3 LIMITATIONS

2.4 USER RELIANCE

3.0 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

3.1 FIELD AND LABORATORY SERVICES

3.2 ASBESTOS ABATEMENT

4.0 LEAD BASED PAINT & LEAD CONTAINING PAINT

4.1 DEFINITIONS

4.2 FIELD AND LABORATORY SERVICES

4.3 LEAD BASED PAINT & LEAD CONTAINING PAINT

4.4 LEAD ABATEMENT ACTIVITIES

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A – SAMPLE LOCATION PLAN

APPENDIX B – LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA

APPENDIX C – PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

APPENDIX D – QUALIFICATIONS OF CONCLUSIONS

Houser Walker Architecture September 1, 2020

Tuttle Building – Suite 233 NOVA Project Number 3018010

1.0 SUMMARY

NOVA Engineering and Environmental, Inc. (NOVA) has completed the Limited Asbestos

Containing Material (ACM) and Lead Based Paint (LBP) Survey for the Tuttle Building Suite 233

Renovations located in Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia (Subject Property). The Limited ACM and

LBP survey at the Subject Property was performed on June 17, 2020.

A brief summary of our findings is presented below. This summary is provided for convenience and should not be substituted for review of the full report, including all attachments as provided herein.

1.1 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

During this study, eighteen (18) samples (containing 37 total layers) of plaster, joint compound, wallboard, ceiling tile, leveler, glue material, vapor barrier, mastic, floor tile, and window glazing were analyzed by NOVA using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), with four (4) of the analyzed samples indicating Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). A sample location plan is included in Appendix B of this Report.

9-Inch Floor Tile

• A total of two (2) samples of the 9-inch floor tile located at the Subject Property indicated >1% asbestos (7% Chrysotile Asbestos). Consequently, we believe all of the 9-inch floor tile located at the Subject Property should be considered Asbestos

Containing Material (ACM).

Black Mastic

• A total of two (2) samples of the black mastic located at the Subject Property indicated >1% asbestos (2% Chrysotile Asbestos). Consequently, we believe all of the black mastic located at the Subject Property should be considered Asbestos

Below is a summary of the trace asbestos identified at the Subject Property:

Joint Compound

• A total of three (3) samples of the joint compound located throughout the Subject

Property indicated <1% asbestos (Trace Chrysotile Asbestos). Material having results of analysis of less than 1% asbestos are considered to be non-asbestos containing material and do not have to be treated as asbestos in the workplace.

However, if disturbed by renovation or demolition, prudent care should be observed regarding worker exposure to material containing asbestos even if less than 1% asbestos.

Tuttle Building – Suite 233 NOVA Project Number 3018010

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Asbestos Standard for

Construction Industry 29 CFR 1926.1101 regulates workplace exposure to asbestos.

OSHA does not define Asbestos Containing Material on asbestos content. Any detectable asbestos, even if <1%, makes it asbestos for purposes of complying with

OSHA regulations to determine worker exposure. The OSHA standard requires that employee exposure to airborne asbestos fibers be maintained below 0.1 asbestos fibers per cubic centimeter of air (0.1 f/cc). The OSHA standard classifies construction and maintenance activities, which could disturb ACM, and specifies work practices and precautions which employers must follow when engaging in each class of regulated work. In addition to worker protection, the mean and methods necessary for ACM abatement are the sole responsibility of the abatement contractor.

A complete list of suspected ACM samples obtained is shown in the laboratory report

(included in Appendix B).

1.2 LEAD BASED PAINT & LEAD CONTAINING PAINT

Forty-nine (49) X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer readings were made by NOVA throughout the interior of the Subject Property to determine the presence of Lead Based

Paint.

Lead Based Paint

Lead Based Paint (LBP) is defined as a paint or varnish containing lead at a concentration >0.5% by weight when determined by laboratory analysis. LBP is also defined by HUD as 1.0 mg/cm2 when determined using an XRF analyzer.

The predominant LBP material identified in the NOVA survey include:

• Painted surfaces of the plaster walls and ceilings located at the Subject Property;

• Painted surfaces of wood windows and doors located at the Subject Property;

• Coated surfaces of ceramic walls located inside the restroom at the Subject Property.

Lead Containing Paint

OSHA does not define Lead Based Paint based on lead content. Any detectable lead in a paint or varnish makes it lead paint for purposes of complying with OSHA regulations to determine worker exposure. Consequently, for purposes of this study, Lead

Containing Paint is considered any detectable level of lead.

The predominant LCP material identified in the NOVA survey include:

• Painted surfaces of wood door and window frames located at the Subject Property.

Tuttle Building – Suite 233 NOVA Project Number 3018010

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY

The Subject Property is located at the Elbert P. Tuttle Building located at 56 Forsyth

Street in Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia (Subject Property). Specifically, for the purposes of this Limited Pre-Renovation Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) and Lead

Based Paint (LBP) Survey, the Subject Property is limited to the interior of Suite 233.

According to the Fulton County Geographical Information System (GIS) Database, the

Subject Property is located on approximately 0.9-acres of land identified as Tax Parcel

Number 14 007800120442.

2.2 PURPOSE

As requested by Houser Walker Architecture (CLIENT), the Limited Pre-Renovation

Asbestos Containing Material and Lead Based Paint Survey was performed in an effort to identify Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) and Lead Based Paint (LBP) at the

Subject Property. This work has been performed in general accordance with applicable state and federal regulations, and routine industry practice.

The ACM survey was performed in general accordance with the Asbestos Hazard

Emergency Response Act (AHERA) guidelines and ASTM E2356-10,”Standard Practice for Comprehensive Building Asbestos Survey” as a Baseline Survey. Deviations from the Baseline Survey protocols include:

• Determination of ACM and LBP quantities were excluded from the scope of work

2.3 LIMITATIONS

NOVA has performed the Limited Pre-Renovation Asbestos Containing Material and

Lead Based Paint Survey, which is a limited inquiry into a property's environmental status and is not sufficient to discover every potential source of ACM or LBP of the property to be evaluated. No survey/sampling can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential ACM or LBP in connection with a property. Performance of this practice is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for

ACM and LBP in connection with a property.

The level of inquiry is variable. Not every property will warrant the same level of assessment for ACM and LBP building material. Consistent with good commercial or customary practices, the appropriate level of assessment will be guided by the type of property subject to assessment, the intended use of the property, the expertise and risk tolerance of the CLIENT, and the information developed in the course of the assessment.

Tuttle Building – Suite 233 NOVA Project Number 3018010

NOVA's findings, opinions, conclusions and recommendations are based on information obtained through visual assessment of surficial conditions in readily accessible areas.

It is possible that additional ACM or LBP building material exist or may subsequently become known that may impact or change the assessment after NOVA's services are complete.

NOVA’s assessment represents our professional opinion, only. Therefore, NOVA cannot, under any circumstances, make a statement of warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that ACM and LBP are limited to those that are discovered while we are performing the survey.

2.4 USER RELIANCE

NOVA’s Limited Pre-Renovation Asbestos Containing Material and Lead Based Paint

Survey, along with the findings and conclusions contained in the report, either in completed form, summary form, or by extraction, is prepared, and intended, for the sole use of Houser Walker Architecture (CLIENT) and therefore may not contain sufficient information for other purposes or parties. The CLIENT is the only intended beneficiary of this report. The contents of NOVA's report will continue to be the property of NOVA. NOVA's report may not be disclosed to, used by, or relied upon by, any person or entity other than the CLIENT without the express written consent of NOVA.

Authorization for disclosure to a third party or authorization for third-party reliance on a final report of any report will be considered by NOVA upon the written request of the

CLIENT. NOVA reserves the right to deny authorization to allow disclosure or reliance of

NOVA's report to third parties.

Tuttle Building – Suite 233 NOVA Project Number 3018010

3.0 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

3.1 FIELD AND LABORATORY SERVICES

Curtis Moses, NOVA professional, and federal and state certified asbestos inspector, performed the field work for the Limited Pre-Renovation Asbestos Containing Material

Survey at the Subject Property on June 17, 2020.

3.1.1 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL SURVEY

The building area was visually assessed by NOVA to identify suspect ACM, which were then grouped into three categories according to their intended use:

• Surfacing Material such as sprayed-on or troweled fireproofing, acoustical and decorative insulation, textured “popcorn” finishes, paint, stucco, etc.

• Thermal System Insulation (TSI), such as pipe, boiler and storage tank insulation, and insulation on ducts, pumps, heat exchangers, and other equipment.

• Miscellaneous Material, such as floor and ceiling tiles, wallboard, asbestos-cement board, siding and other building material that did not fall into one of the previously mentioned categories.

Where applicable, material with similar texture, color and general appearance were considered homogeneous for sampling purposes, including visually similar material on different floors. NOVA’s assessment also included touching representative samples to determine friability, a mechanical classification defined as whether a material can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

Bulk samples were subsequently obtained in general accordance with the AHERA (40

CFR 763.86, Sampling) and ASTM E2356-10 procedures. The samples were placed in appropriate containers, and the containers sealed and labeled with a unique identification number. The samples were subsequently transported (following routine industry practices and chain-of-custody procedures) to EMSL Analytical, LLC (EMSL) for analysis.

The ACM samples were analyzed for asbestos using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) methods in accordance with EPA Method 600/R-93/116. Copies of the complete asbestos laboratory report and chain-of custody are included in Appendix B.

Using the results of the laboratory analysis and NOVA’s visual assessment, the asbestos containing building material can be further categorized into three groups:

Tuttle Building – Suite 233 NOVA Project Number 3018010

• Friable ACM - Material means any material containing more than one percent (1%) asbestos as determined using the method specified in Appendix A, Subpart F, 40

CFR part 763 Section 1, Polarized Light Microscopy, that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

• Category I Nonfriable ACM - Asbestos-containing packing, gaskets, resilient floor covering, and asphalt roofing products containing more than one percent (1%) asbestos as determined using the method specified in Appendix A, Subpart F, 40

CFR part 763, Section 1, Polarized Light Microscopy.

• Category II Nonfriable ACM - Any material, excluding Category I Nonfriable ACM, containing more than one percent (1%) asbestos as determined using the methods specified in Appendix A, Subpart F, 40 CFR part 763, Section 1, Polarized Light

Microscopy that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

During this study, eighteen (18) samples (containing 37 total layers) of plaster, joint compound, wallboard, ceiling tile, leveler, glue material, vapor barrier, mastic, floor tile, and window glazing were analyzed by NOVA using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), with four (4) of the analyzed samples indicating Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). A sample location plan is included in Appendix B of this Report.

9-Inch Floor Tile

• A total of two (2) samples of the 9-inch floor tile located at the Subject Property indicated >1% asbestos (7% Chrysotile Asbestos). Consequently, we believe all of the 9-inch floor tile located at the Subject Property should be considered Asbestos

Black Mastic

• A total of two (2) samples of the black mastic located at the Subject Property indicated >1% asbestos (2% Chrysotile Asbestos). Consequently, we believe all of the black mastic located at the Subject Property should be considered Asbestos

Tuttle Building – Suite 233 NOVA Project Number 3018010

Below is a summary of the trace asbestos identified at the Subject Property:

Joint Compound

• A total of three (3) samples of the joint compound located throughout the Subject

Property indicated <1% asbestos (Trace Chrysotile Asbestos). Material having results of analysis of less than 1% asbestos are considered to be non-asbestos containing material and do not have to be treated as asbestos in the workplace.

However, if disturbed by renovation or demolition, prudent care should be observed regarding worker exposure to material containing asbestos even if less than 1% asbestos.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Asbestos Standard for

Construction Industry 29 CFR 1926.1101 regulates workplace exposure to asbestos.

OSHA does not define Asbestos Containing Material on asbestos content. Any detectable asbestos, even if <1%, makes it asbestos for purposes of complying with

OSHA regulations to determine worker exposure. The OSHA standard requires that employee exposure to airborne asbestos fibers be maintained below 0.1 asbestos fibers per cubic centimeter of air (0.1 f/cc). The OSHA standard classifies construction and maintenance activities, which could disturb ACM, and specifies work practices and precautions which employers must follow when engaging in each class of regulated work. In addition to worker protection, the mean and methods necessary for ACM abatement are the sole responsibility of the abatement contractor.

A complete list of suspected ACM samples obtained is shown in the laboratory report

(included in Appendix B).

Determination of the actual quantities of ACM should be made by the abatement contractor during a site inspection prior to beginning abatement.

3.2 ASBESTOS ABATEMENT

Any component, which is similar in appearance to, and is in the general vicinity or similar application of samples identified as containing asbestos, as well as any other material not shown by proper sampling and analysis to be non-asbestos containing, should be handled as asbestos-containing material (ACM). As previously noted, determination of the actual quantities of ACM at all locations should be made by the contractor during a site inspection prior to beginning abatement.

ACM should be abated (removed) prior to disturbance by maintenance, renovation and/or demolition by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor and disposed at an approved solid waste disposal facility.

Tuttle Building – Suite 233 NOVA Project Number 3018010

Abatement is highly regulated and consists of several parts. In addition to the demolition/renovation permit, a ten (10) day advance notification to the Georgia

Environmental Protection Division (GA-EPD) is required.

During abatement, third party monitoring is recommended to review if the asbestos is adequately managed and contained during the abatement process and to document clearance and re-occupancy criteria established for the project.

Most Clients also request an abatement management report. This report compiles pertinent data regarding the personnel, abatement, and asbestos disposal for liability management after the fact should there be concerns later from workers or others. The ten (10) day notice, abatement, third party oversight, and management report are not included with the authorized scope of work for this project, but we can provide these supplemental services, if desired. Please note that the means and methods necessary for

ACM abatement, as well as worker protection and monitoring, are the sole responsibility of the abatement contractor.

Tuttle Building – Suite 233 NOVA Project Number 3018010

4.0 LEAD BASED PAINT & LEAD CONTAINING PAINT

4.1 DEFINITIONS

concentration >0.5% by weight when determined by laboratory analysis, (1972, Lead

Based Paint Poison Prevention Act (LBPPPA)). LBP is also defined by HUD as 1.0 mg/cm2 when determined using x-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer. These concentrations are applicable for housing and child-care facilities; however, these concentration levels are also frequently used as targets in commercial projects to allow flexibility in future area usage.

Lead Containing Paint (LCP) was defined as a paint or varnish containing lead at a concentration >0.06% by weight (600 ppm) when determined by laboratory analysis, (1978, LBPPPA). In 2009, LCP was further defined as containing lead at a concentration

>0.009% by weight (90 ppm) for certain consumer products and residential use.

Please note that OSHA does not define Lead Based Paint based on lead content. Any detectable lead in a paint or varnish makes it lead paint for purposes of complying with

OSHA regulations to determine worker exposure. Consequently, for purposes of this study, Lead Containing Paint is considered any detectable lead.

4.2 FIELD AND LABORATORY SERVICES

Curtis Moses, NOVA professional and EPA certified lead inspector, performed the field work for the Limited Lead Based Paint Survey at the Subject Property on June 17, 2020.

Paint (LBP).

4.2.1 LEAD BASED PAINT SURVEY

Where applicable, material with similar texture, color and general appearance were considered homogeneous for sampling purposes, including visually similar material on different floors and/or different buildings.

Forty-nine (49) readings using x-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer were made throughout the interior of the Subject Property structures to assess the presence of Lead Based

Paint (LBP). NOVA’s XRF readings are presented below:

Tuttle Building – Suite 233 NOVA Project Number 3018010

No. Time Units Component Substrate Side Condition Color Results PbC Error

1 6/17/2020 12:04 cps 0.77 0

2 6/17/2020 12:10 mg / cm ^2 positive 1 0.1

3 6/17/2020 12:13 mg / cm ^2 positive 1 0.1

4 6/17/2020 12:16 mg / cm ^2 positive 1 0.1

5 6/17/2020 13:22 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan positive <LOD 23.4

6 6/17/2020 13:23 mg / cm ^2 baseboard wood A intact white negative <LOD 0.03

7 6/17/2020 13:23 mg / cm ^2 chair rail wood A intact white negative <LOD 0.03

8 6/17/2020 13:24 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown negative <LOD 0.03

9 6/17/2020 13:24 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown negative <LOD 0.03

10 6/17/2020 13:24 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster D intact tan positive <LOD 26.25

11 6/17/2020 13:25 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall C intact tan negative <LOD 0.03

12 6/17/2020 13:26 mg / cm ^2 door wood C intact white negative <LOD 1.16

13 6/17/2020 13:26 mg / cm ^2 door wood C intact white negative <LOD 0.57

14 6/17/2020 13:27 mg / cm ^2 floor ceramic C intact tan negative <LOD 0.03

15 6/17/2020 13:27 mg / cm ^2 wall ceramic C intact tan positive <LOD 18.15

16 6/17/2020 13:28 mg / cm ^2 wall ceramic B intact tan positive <LOD 23.7

17 6/17/2020 13:28 mg / cm ^2 window ceramic B intact white negative <LOD 0.03

18 6/17/2020 13:29 mg / cm ^2 door wood B intact white negative <LOD 0.03

19 6/17/2020 13:29 mg / cm ^2 door wood B intact white negative <LOD 0.03

20 6/17/2020 13:30 mg / cm ^2 chair rail wood A intact white negative <LOD 0.03

21 6/17/2020 13:30 mg / cm ^2 baseboard wood A intact white negative <LOD 0.03

22 6/17/2020 13:31 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown negative <LOD 0.03

23 6/17/2020 13:31 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown negative <LOD 0.03

24 6/17/2020 13:31 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown negative <LOD 0.03

25 6/17/2020 13:32 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan positive <LOD 26.85

26 6/17/2020 13:33 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall B intact tan negative <LOD 0.03

27 6/17/2020 13:33 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster B intact white positive <LOD 18.75

28 6/17/2020 13:34 mg / cm ^2 shelf metal C intact white negative <LOD 0.03

29 6/17/2020 13:34 mg / cm ^2 floor wood C intact brown negative <LOD 0.03

30 6/17/2020 13:36 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall A intact tan negative <LOD 0.03

31 6/17/2020 13:36 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster C intact tan positive <LOD 26.55

32 6/17/2020 13:37 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white negative <LOD 0.04

33 6/17/2020 13:38 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white negative <LOD 0.04

34 6/17/2020 13:38 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white negative <LOD 1.08

35 6/17/2020 13:39 mg / cm ^2 floor wood C intact brown negative <LOD 0.03

36 6/17/2020 13:40 mg / cm ^2 floor drywall B intact white negative <LOD 0.03

37 6/17/2020 13:46 mg / cm ^2 ceiling plaster B intact tan positive 23.6 10.4

38 6/17/2020 13:47 mg / cm ^2 ceiling plaster B intact green positive <LOD 28.65

39 6/17/2020 13:48 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall A intact tan negative <LOD 0.03

40 6/17/2020 13:49 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact white negative <LOD 0.03

41 6/17/2020 13:49 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact white negative <LOD 0.03

42 6/17/2020 13:49 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white negative <LOD 0.03

Tuttle Building – Suite 233 NOVA Project Number 3018010

No. Time Units Component Substrate Side Condition Color Results PbC Error

43 6/17/2020 13:49 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white negative <LOD 0.68

44 6/17/2020 13:50 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white negative <LOD 0.23

45 6/17/2020 13:51 mg / cm ^2 baseboard wood C intact white negative <LOD 0.03

46 6/17/2020 13:51 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster C intact tan positive <LOD 26.55

47 6/17/2020 14:12 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1 0.1

48 6/17/2020 14:14 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1 0.1

49 6/17/2020 14:17 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1 0.1

< LOD = below level of detection

4.3 LEAD BASED PAINT & LEAD CONTAINING PAINT

Paint.

The predominant LBP material identified in the NOVA survey include:

• Painted surfaces of the plaster walls and ceilings located at the Subject Property;

• Painted surfaces of wood windows and doors located at the Subject Property;

• Coated surfaces of ceramic walls located inside the restroom at the Subject Property.

Lead Containing Paint

OSHA does not define Lead Based Paint based on lead content. Any detectable lead in a paint or varnish makes it lead paint for purposes of complying with OSHA regulations to determine worker exposure. Consequently, for purposes of this study, Lead

Containing Paint is considered any detectable level of lead.

Tuttle Building – Suite 233 NOVA Project Number 3018010

The predominant LCP material identified in the NOVA survey include:

• Painted surfaces of wood door and window frames located at the Subject Property.

4.4 LEAD ABATEMENT ACTIVITIES

The US EPA has stated that solid architectural components coated with LBP are less likely to be hazardous because of the small ratio of lead paint to total waste mass (US

EPA, 1993, Applicability of RCRA Disposal Requirements to Lead-Based Paint

Abatement Wastes, Final Report, EPA 747-R-93-006 Technical Programs Branch, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, March 1993). The US Army conducted a study which concluded that whole-building demolition debris is not likely to exceed the toxicity characteristic standard for lead if it is handled as a single, whole waste stream and disposed of all together (US Dept. of the Army, US Army Environmental Hygiene Agency, Interim Final Report, Lead-Based Paint Contaminated Debris Waste Characterization

Study No. 27-26-JK44-92. May 1993). Consequently, whole-building demolition debris is typically considered a non-hazardous waste with regard to lead under RCRA.

We believe the greatest impact of LBP and/or LCP may be on the contractor’s salvage activities of railing, doorframes, etc.., particularly activities that include cutting, grinding, sanding or scraping. As previously noted, OSHA does not define lead paint based on content. Any detectable lead in paint makes it lead paint for purposes of complying with

OSHA regulations to determine worker exposure.

• The contractor must conduct an initial exposure assessment of all workplaces and operations where lead or lead-containing material is being used, disturbed or removed to determine whether any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level.

• Personnel involved in LBP or LCP must be monitored and directed by a Competent

Person who will determine appropriate compliance controls and procedures.

• The Lead in Construction standard's action level is 30 ug/m3 calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average.

In addition, on April 22, 2008, EPA issued a rule requiring the use of lead-safe practices and other actions aimed at preventing lead poisoning. Under the rule, beginning April

22, 2010, contractors performing abatement, renovation, repair and painting projects that disturb lead-based paint in homes, child care facilities, and schools (K-12) built before 1978 must be certified by EPA and must follow specific lead-safe work practices to prevent lead contamination.

Tuttle Building – Suite 233 NOVA Project Number 3018010

Persons performing lead-based paint (LBP) abatement activities must:

• Be certified

• Work for a Certified Lead Firm

Persons performing renovation work must:

• Be a certified Renovator

• Work for a Certified Renovation Firm

The EPA and the also regulate the LBP and LCP waste stream resulting from abatement and renovation activities. A potential lead waste material must be analyzed for toxicity using the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP).

• If TCLP results from waste stream of paint chips, dust (including dust from floor refinishing operations), soil, and/or stripper sludge are less than 5 milligrams per liter (5 parts per million or ppm), the waste may usually go to a municipal solid waste

(MSW) or construction debris (CD) landfill, depending on concentrations and landfill operator requirements.

• If greater than 5 milligrams per liter (5 ppm) must comply with Georgia State Rules for Hazardous Waste Management

Please note that the means and methods necessary for LBP and/or LCP abatement or demolition, as well as worker protection and monitoring, are the sole responsibility of the contractor.

APPENDIX A

SAMPLE LOCATION PLAN

SAMPLE LOCATION PLAN

Suite 233

HOUSER WALKER ARCHITECTURE

Tuttle Suite 233 Renovations

NOVA Project Number 3020073

Asbestos Containing Material

Trace Asbestos

Non-Asbestos Containing Material

Lead Based Paint

Lead Containing Paint

No Detect

Subject Property Outline

T-P-1

06070809

27 28

323334

4445 46

T-P-3

T-P-2

T-JC-4

T-JC-5

T-JC-6

T-W-7

T-W-8

T-CT-9

T-CT-10

T-L-11

T-L-12

T-FT-13

T-FT-14

T-FT-15

T-G-16

T-GL-17

T-GL-18

APPENDIX B

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA

XRF RESULTS

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

2205 Corporate Plaza Parkway SE, Suite 200 Smyrna, GA 30080

Tel/Fax: (770) 956-9150 / (770) 956-9181 http://www.EMSL.com / atlantalab@emsl.com

072004199EMSL Order:

Customer ID: NOVA30

Customer PO: 3020-233

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Curtis Moses (678) 982-5576

Fax:Nova Engineering & Environmental, Inc. (770) 425-1113

Received Date:3900 Kennesaw 75 Parkway 06/17/2020 2:55 PM

Analysis Date:Suite 100 06/22/2020

Collected Date:Kennesaw, GA 30144

Project: 3020-233

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

T-P-1-Skim Coat

072004199-0001

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster - Above Grid -

Hall

T-P-1-Base Coat

072004199-0001A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster - Above Grid -

Hall

T-P-2-Skim Coat

072004199-0002

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster - Above Grid -

Chambers

T-P-2-Base Coat

072004199-0002A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster - Above Grid -

Chambers

T-P-3-Joint Compound

072004199-0003

<1% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster - Above Grid -

At Hall

T-P-3-Skim Coat

072004199-0003A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster - Above Grid -

At Hall

T-P-3-Base Coat

072004199-0003B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster - Above Grid -

At Hall

T-JC-4-Joint Compound

072004199-0004

<1% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound -

Above Grid -

Chambers

T-JC-4-Tape

072004199-0004A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound -

Above Grid -

Chambers

T-JC-5-Joint Compound

072004199-0005

<1% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound -

Above Grid - Hall

T-JC-5-Drywall

072004199-0005A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound -

Above Grid - Hall

T-JC-6-Joint Compound

072004199-0006

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound -

Above Grid -Elec

Closet

T-JC-6-Drywall

072004199-0006A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound -

Above Grid -Elec

Closet

T-W-7

072004199-0007

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Wallboard - Above

Grid

T-W-8

072004199-0008

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Wallboard - Elec

Closet

T-CT-9

072004199-0009

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)35%Cellulose

Min. Wool

60%

5%

Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile 2x2 - Hall

Initial report from: 06/22/2020 13:53:43

Page 1 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 6/22/2020 1:53 PM

Tel/Fax: (770) 956-9150 / (770) 956-9181 http://www.EMSL.com / atlantalab@emsl.com

072004199EMSL Order:

Customer ID: NOVA30

Customer PO: 3020-233

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

T-CT-10

072004199-0010

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)35%Cellulose

Min. Wool

60%

5%

Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile 2x2 -

Clerk Office

T-L-11-Leveler

072004199-0011

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Leveler w/ Glue Over

Vapor Barrier w/

Mastic at Restroom

Hall

T-L-11-Mastic 1

072004199-0011A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Leveler w/ Glue Over

Vapor Barrier w/

Mastic at Restroom

Hall

T-L-11-Mastic 2

072004199-0011B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Leveler w/ Glue Over

Vapor Barrier w/

Mastic at Restroom

Hall

T-L-11-Felt

072004199-0011C

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Leveler w/ Glue Over

Vapor Barrier w/

Mastic at Restroom

Hall

T-L-12-Leveler

072004199-0012

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Leveler w/ Glue Over

Vapor Barrier w/

Mastic at Restroom

Hall

T-L-12-Mastic

072004199-0012A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Leveler w/ Glue Over

Vapor Barrier w/

Mastic at Restroom

Hall

T-L-12-Felt

072004199-0012B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Leveler w/ Glue Over

Vapor Barrier w/

Mastic at Restroom

Hall

T-FT-13-Floor Tile

072004199-0013

7% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)93%Brown

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

9x9 FloorTile w/

Mastic- Clerk Office

T-FT-13-Mastic 1

072004199-0013A

2% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)98%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

9x9 FloorTile w/

Mastic- Clerk Office

T-FT-13-Mastic 2

072004199-0013B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

9x9 FloorTile w/

Mastic- Clerk Office

T-FT-15-Floor Tile

072004199-0014

7% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)93%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

9x9 FloorTile w/

Mastic- Hall at Next

Chambers

T-FT-15-Mastic 1

072004199-0014A

2% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)98%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

9x9 FloorTile w/

Mastic- Hall at Next

Chambers

T-FT-15-Mastic 2

072004199-0014B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

9x9 FloorTile w/

Mastic- Hall at Next

Chambers

T-FT-15-Felt

072004199-0014C

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

9x9 FloorTile w/

Mastic- Hall at Next

Chambers

T-FT-14-Leveler

072004199-0015

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Leveler w / Mastic and Vapor Barrier -

Clerk Office (Mid)

T-FT-14-Mastic

072004199-0015A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Leveler w / Mastic and Vapor Barrier -

Clerk Office (Mid)

Page 2 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 6/22/2020 1:53 PM

Tel/Fax: (770) 956-9150 / (770) 956-9181 http://www.EMSL.com / atlantalab@emsl.com

072004199EMSL Order:

Customer ID: NOVA30

Customer PO: 3020-233

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

T-FT-14-Felt

072004199-0015B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Leveler w / Mastic and Vapor Barrier -

Clerk Office (Mid)

T-G-16

072004199-0016

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Additional Carpet

Glue

T-GL-17

072004199-0017

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Window Glazing -

Chambers

T-GL-18

072004199-0018

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Window Glazing -

Clerk Office

Analyst(s)

Anthony Sanaie (24)

Ibironke Owa (13)

Michael Murphy or Other Approved Signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim

Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non -friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc Smyrna, GA NVLAP Lab Code 101048-1

Page 3 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 6/22/2020 1:53 PM

OrderID: 072004199

OrderID: 072004199

No. Time Units Component Substrate Side Condition Color Results PbC Error

1 6/17/2020 12:04 cps 0.77 0

2 6/17/2020 12:10 mg / cm ^2 positive 1 0.1

3 6/17/2020 12:13 mg / cm ^2 positive 1 0.1

4 6/17/2020 12:16 mg / cm ^2 positive 1 0.1

5 6/17/2020 13:22 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan positive <LOD 23.4

6 6/17/2020 13:23 mg / cm ^2 baseboard wood A intact white negative <LOD 0.03

7 6/17/2020 13:23 mg / cm ^2 chair rail wood A intact white negative <LOD 0.03

8 6/17/2020 13:24 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown negative <LOD 0.03

9 6/17/2020 13:24 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown negative <LOD 0.03

10 6/17/2020 13:24 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster D intact tan positive <LOD 26.25

11 6/17/2020 13:25 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall C intact tan negative <LOD 0.03

12 6/17/2020 13:26 mg / cm ^2 door wood C intact white negative <LOD 1.16

13 6/17/2020 13:26 mg / cm ^2 door wood C intact white negative <LOD 0.57

14 6/17/2020 13:27 mg / cm ^2 floor ceramic C intact tan negative <LOD 0.03

15 6/17/2020 13:27 mg / cm ^2 wall ceramic C intact tan positive <LOD 18.15

16 6/17/2020 13:28 mg / cm ^2 wall ceramic B intact tan positive <LOD 23.7

17 6/17/2020 13:28 mg / cm ^2 window ceramic B intact white negative <LOD 0.03

18 6/17/2020 13:29 mg / cm ^2 door wood B intact white negative <LOD 0.03

19 6/17/2020 13:29 mg / cm ^2 door wood B intact white negative <LOD 0.03

20 6/17/2020 13:30 mg / cm ^2 chair rail wood A intact white negative <LOD 0.03

21 6/17/2020 13:30 mg / cm ^2 baseboard wood A intact white negative <LOD 0.03

22 6/17/2020 13:31 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown negative <LOD 0.03

23 6/17/2020 13:31 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown negative <LOD 0.03

24 6/17/2020 13:31 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown negative <LOD 0.03

25 6/17/2020 13:32 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan positive <LOD 26.85

26 6/17/2020 13:33 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall B intact tan negative <LOD 0.03

27 6/17/2020 13:33 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster B intact white positive <LOD 18.75

28 6/17/2020 13:34 mg / cm ^2 shelf metal C intact white negative <LOD 0.03

29 6/17/2020 13:34 mg / cm ^2 floor wood C intact brown negative <LOD 0.03

30 6/17/2020 13:36 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall A intact tan negative <LOD 0.03

31 6/17/2020 13:36 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster C intact tan positive <LOD 26.55

32 6/17/2020 13:37 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white negative <LOD 0.04

33 6/17/2020 13:38 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white negative <LOD 0.04

34 6/17/2020 13:38 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white negative <LOD 1.08

35 6/17/2020 13:39 mg / cm ^2 floor wood C intact brown negative <LOD 0.03

36 6/17/2020 13:40 mg / cm ^2 floor drywall B intact white negative <LOD 0.03

37 6/17/2020 13:46 mg / cm ^2 ceiling plaster B intact tan positive 23.6 10.4

38 6/17/2020 13:47 mg / cm ^2 ceiling plaster B intact green positive <LOD 28.65

39 6/17/2020 13:48 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall A intact tan negative <LOD 0.03

40 6/17/2020 13:49 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact white negative <LOD 0.03

41 6/17/2020 13:49 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact white negative <LOD 0.03

42 6/17/2020 13:49 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white negative <LOD 0.03

No. Time Units Component Substrate Side Condition Color Results PbC Error

43 6/17/2020 13:49 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white negative <LOD 0.68

44 6/17/2020 13:50 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white negative <LOD 0.23

45 6/17/2020 13:51 mg / cm ^2 baseboard wood C intact white negative <LOD 0.03

46 6/17/2020 13:51 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster C intact tan positive <LOD 26.55

47 6/17/2020 14:12 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1 0.1

48 6/17/2020 14:14 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1 0.1

49 6/17/2020 14:17 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1 0.1

< LOD = below level of detection

APPENDIX C

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

NICKOLAUS DASANTOS

Environmental Business Unit Manager

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Mr. DaSantos is a Manager with NOVA’s Environmental Group in Kennesaw, Georgia. Mr. DaSantos has experience as an environmental consultant performing all aspects of Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site

Assessments (ESAs), Risk Hazard Assessments (RHAs), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Assessments, Georgia Environmental Policy Act (GEPA) Assessments, Prospective Purchaser Corrective Action Plans (PPCAPs), Hazardous Site Response Act (HSRA) Notifications, Brownfield Applications, Compliance Status Reports (CSRs), Oversight for the assessment, excavation, removal and remediation of Underg round Storage Tanks (USTs), and the installation of soil borings/groundwater monitoring wells, surface and groundwater sampling, soil sampling, multi-incremental soil sampling, stockpile soil sampling, Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) sampling, Mold Assessments, Radon Assessments, Radon Mitigation Design, Radon Mitigation Installation

Oversight, biocell construction/remediation, and Vapor Intrusion Assessments, Vapor Intrusion Mitigation (VIMS)

Design, Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System Installation Oversight.

Mr. DaSantos is experienced in performing pre-renovation/pre-demolition asbestos inspections, lead based paint inspections, mold inspections, as well as large asbestos, lead based paint, and hazardous materials abatement oversight projects.

Mr. DaSantos is also experienced in assessment and remediation of hazardous waste sites impacted by chlorinated solvents, petroleum hydrocarbons, and other chemical substances released into the environment.

Mr. DaSantos has knowledge of state and federal environmental programs and government regulations, including RCRA, HSRA, CERCLA, UST/LUST, AHERA, ASHARA, and OSHA.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE

Municipal/Government

Asbestos Inspection, Alaska

Department of Natural Resources, Healy, AK

Asbestos Inspection, Federal

Courthouse Building, Rome, GA

Phase I ESA, GEPA Assessment, Cherokee County Sheriff’s Facility, Canton, GA

Lead Inspection, Canton, GA

Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring, Well Closure, Municipal Fueling

Facility, Canton, GA

Monitoring Well Closure, Canton, GA

Mold Inspections and Mold Air

Sampling, Multiple Fire Stations and

Police Stations, Cherokee

County, GA

Asbestos Inspection, Lead Based

Paint Inspection, Asbestos

Abatement Oversight, Lead Based

Paint Abatement Oversight, UST

Closure, City of Newnan, GA

Phase I ESA, Phase II ESA, multiple

Fire and Police Department facilities, Clayton County, GA

GEPA and Phase I ESA, Police

Department Training Facility, Canton, GA

Asbestos Inspection, Asbestos

Abatement Oversight, Hazardous

Building Material Inventory, Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Atlanta, GA

Phase I ESA, Former Public Library, Homer, AK

Education:

BS, Natural Science, with emphasis in Geology, University of Alaska at Anchorage 2011

BA, Philosophy, University of

Georgia 2000

Certificate of Environmental

Ethics, University of Georgia, Nickolaus DaSantos

Education

Asbestos Inspection, Lead Based

Paint Inspection, Hazardous Materials

Survey, Phase I ESA, Agnes Scott

College, Atlanta, GA

Asbestos Inspections, Asbestos

Management Planning, Lead

Inspections, RHAs, Mold Inspections, City Schools of Decatur, Decatur, GA

Asbestos Inspection, Asbestos

Abatement Design Specifications, Asbestos Abatement Oversight, Lead

Based Paint Inspection, Polychlorinated Biphenyl Inspection, Hazardous Materials Remediation

Oversight, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA

Asbestos Inspection, Asbestos

Abatement Design Specifications, Lead Based Paint Inspection, Hazardous Materials Survey, Phase I

ESA, Spelman College, Atlanta, GA

Asbestos and Lead Based Paint

Inspection, Fairmount Elementary

School, Fairmount, GA

Lead Inspection, North Springs High

School, Sandy Springs, GA

Georgia Environmental Policy Act

(GEPA) Assessment and Phase I ESA, Technical College System of Georgia, Edison, GA

Risk Hazard Assessment, Kipp Strive

Academy, Atlanta, GA

UST Remediation Specifications, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA

Asbestos Inspection, Lead Based

Paint Inspection, West Georgia

College, Carrollton, GA

AHERA 3-Year Re-Inspection, St.

Mary’s Catholic School, Rome, GA

Phase I and II ESA, Soil Sampling, UST Removal, Georgia

Environmental Policy Act

Assessment, Chattahoochee

Technical College, Woodstock, GA

Asbestos and Radon Survey, Abatement Specifications, Lovett

School, Atlanta, GA

Electromagnetic Frequency (EMF)

Study and High Voltage Electric

Transmission Line Risk Assessment

Study, DeKalb County Schools, DeKalb, GA

Phase I ESA and RHA, Atlanta Public

Schools, Atlanta, GA

Phase I ESAs, RHAs, DeKalb County

Schools System, DeKalb County, GA

Soil Sampling, Georgia Gwinnett

College, Lawrenceville, GA

Soil Sampling, Kipp Ways Academy, Atlanta, GA

AHERA 3-Year Re-Inspection, St.

Catherine of Sienna Catholic

School, Kennesaw, GA

AHERA 3-Year Re-Inspection, St.

Joseph Catholic School, Marietta, GA

AHERA 3-Year Re-Inspection, Our

Lady of Mercy Catholic High School, Fayetteville, GA

Asbestos Abatement Oversight, St. Pius X Catholic High School, Atlanta, GA

AHERA 3-Year Re-Inspection, St. Peter Claver Catholic School, Decatur, GA

GEPA and Phase I ESA, Gordon

County Career Academy, Calhoun, GA

Certifications / Registrations:

U.S. EPA Lead Inspector

Certification No. 1892

Certified Niton XRF Operator

AHERA (Asbestos) Building

Inspector/Asbestos in

Buildings: Management Plan

(Management Planner)

Certificate No. 17447

Asbestos Abatement Designer

Certificate No. 4396

Control of Respirable

Crystalline Silica Dust

40 hour HAZWOPER Training

Residential

Prospective Purchaser Corrective

Action Plans, Brownfield Applications, Compliance Status Reports, HSRA

Notifications, Water Usage Surveys, Multiple Sites, Atlanta, GA

Radon Mitigation Design

Multiple Locations, Atlanta, GA

Radon Mitigation Design

33 Level Residential Tower, Atlanta, GA

Vapor Intrusion Surveys (Pre- and Post-

Construction), Multiple Sites, Atlanta, GA

Radon Assessment

Apartment Complex

Hampton, GA

Radon Surveys, Multiple Locations, AK, GA, NC and SC

Oversight for the assessment, excavation, removal and remediation of Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) multiple sites throughout GA, NC, and

AK

Decommissioning of Heating Oil USTs, Anchorage, AK

Phase I ESA, Hazardous Building

Material Inventory, TCLP Sampling, Anchorage, AK

UST Contaminated Soil Excavation, Talkeetna, AK

Asbestos and Lead Based Paint

Inspection, Phase I ESA, Farm, Trapper

Creek, AK

Groundwater Monitoring, Trapper

Creek, AK

Asbestos Inspection, Slocomb, AL

Multiple Phase I ESAs, Greenspace, Athens, GA

Asbestos Inspection, Lead Based Paint

Inspection, Phase I ESA, Multiple Sites, AL, AK, GA, NC, SC, FL, TN

Retail

Phase I ESA, Strip Mall, Eagle

River, AK

Decommissioning of USTs & Lead

Soil Screening, Service Station, Anchorage, AK

Ponce City Market

Radon Assessment, Atlanta, GA

Radon Mitigation Design

23 Level Tower, Mixed-Use/Retail, Atlanta, GA

Office

Asbestos and Lead Based Paint

Inspection, Big Brothers and Big

Sisters Atlanta Office Building, Atlanta, GA

Asbestos and Lead Based Paint

Inspection, Hazardous Building

Materials Inventory, 22-Level High

Rise Office Building, Peachtree

Road, Atlanta, GA

Lead Based Paint Inspection, 52-

Level High Rise Office Building, Atlanta, GA

Radon Mitigation Design

Multiple Locations, Recreational

Asbestos Operations and Maintenance

Plan, City Hall East/Ponce City Market, Atlanta, GA

Soils Assessment, National College

Football Hall of Fame, Atlanta, GA

Lead Based Paint Sampling, Delta

Heritage Museum, Atlanta, GA

Aviation

Groundwater Monitoring, Airstrip, Nikiski, AK

Manufacturing/Industrial

Asbestos and Polychlorinated Biphenyl

(PCB) Inspection, GE Manufacturing

Facility, Murfreesboro, TN

Asbestos, Lead Based Paint, Hazardous Materials Survey, Siemens

Facility, Atlanta, GA

Asbestos Inspection, Beverage Can

Manufacturing Facility, Forest Park, GA

Asbestos Dust Wipe Sampling, Brake

Manufacturing Facility, Cartersville, GA

Asbestos and Lead Based Paint

Inspection, Train Depot, Blue Ridge, GA

Asbestos and Lead Based Paint

Inspection, Phase I ESA, Phase II ESA, Groundwater and Soil Sampling, Former Cotton Mill, Jackson, GA

Multi-Family/Mixed Use

Asbestos and Lead Based Paint

Inspections, Phase I ESAs, Multiple

Office/Retail Facilities, Anchorage, AK

Radon Assessment Multiple

Office/Retail Facilities, Atlanta, GA

CURTIS MOSES

Staff Professional

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Mr. Moses is a Staff Professional with NOVA’s Environmental Group. Mr. Moses has experience as an environmental professional providing various aspects of environmental consultation. His experience includes performing pre-renovation/pre-demolition asbestos inspections, lead based paint inspections, lead risk assessments, indoor air quality studies, microbial assessments, Phase I Site Assessments as well as large-scale asbestos and lead abatement oversight. He has worked in this industry since 2006.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE

Education

Asbestos Inspection, Agnes Scott

College Dormitory, Atlanta, GA

AHERA 3-Year Re-Inspection, Asbestos Inspection, Abatement

Oversight, Pace Academy, Atlanta, GA

AHERA 3-Year Re-Inspection, City of

Atlanta Schools

AHERA 3-Year Re-Inspection, Abatement Oversight, Clearance

Monitoring, Darlington School, Rome, GA

TEM Clearance Testing, Abatement

Oversight, Marist School, Atlanta, GA

Asbestos Inspection, Gwinnett

County Schools, Norcross, GA

Asbestos Inspection and Clearance

Monitoring, University of Georgia, Athens, GA

Asbestos Inspection, Abatement

Oversight, Newnan Hospital

Redevelopment, Newnan, GA

AHERA 3-Year Re-Inspection Christ the King Catholic School, Atlanta, GA

AHERA 3-Year Re-Inspection

Immaculate Heart of Mary Catholic

School, Atlanta, GA

AHERA 3-Year Re-Inspection St.

Jude the Apostle Catholic School, Atlanta, GA

AHERA 3-Year Re-Inspection St.

John the Evangelist Catholic School, Hapeville, GA

AHERA 3-Year Re-Inspection, Operations and Maintenance

Assessment, and Hazardous

Building Materials Survey, Marist

School, Atlanta, GA

TEM…