SOW BASE Non Resident Chambers 216 and 238 and 434 Pre-Renovation ACM and LBP Survey Report (1).pdf

REPORT OF LIMITED

PRE-RENOVATION

ASBESTOS CONTAINING

MATERIAL AND LEAD BASED

PAINT SURVEY

Tuttle/Godbold Renovations Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia

PREPARED FOR:

Houser Walker Architecture 1819 Peachtree Road, NE.

Suite 102 Atlanta, Georgia 30309

NOVA Project Number: 3019150

October 25, 2019

P R O F E S S I O N A L | P R A C T I C A L | P R O V E N

3 9 0 0 K e n n e s a w 7 5 P a r k w a y , S u i t e 1 0 0 , K e n n e s a w , G e o r g i a 3 0 1 4 4 t . 7 7 0 . 4 2 5 . 0 7 7 7 / f . 7 7 0 . 4 2 5 . 1 1 1 3 / u s a n o v a . c o m

October 25, 2019

HOUSER WALKER ARCHITECTURE

1819 Peachtree Road, NE Suite 102 Atlanta, Georgia 30309

Attention: Mr. Frank M. Houser, III Principal

Subject: Report of Limited Pre-Renovation Asbestos Containing Material and Lead Based Paint Survey

TUTTLE/GODBOLD RENOVATIONS

Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia NOVA Project Number 3019150

Mr. Houser, III:

NOVA Engineering and Environmental, LLC (NOVA) has completed the Limited Pre-Renovation Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) and Lead Based Paint (LBP) Survey for the Tuttle/Godbold Building Renovations located in Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia. We appreciate your selection of NOVA and for the opportunity to be of service on this project. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance.

Sincerely, NOVA Engineering and Environmental, Inc.

Curtis Moses Nickolaus DaSantos Staff Professional Business Unit Manager Environmental Services Environmental Services AHERA No. 17425 AHERA No. 17447 EPA Lead Inspector No. 1876 EPA Lead Inspector No. 1793 EPA Risk Assessor No. 1914

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SUMMARY

1.1 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

1.2 LEAD BASED PAINT & LEAD CONTAINING PAINT

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY

2.2 PURPOSE

2.3 LIMITATIONS

2.4 USER RELIANCE

3.0 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

3.1 FIELD AND LABORATORY SERVICES

4.0 LEAD BASED PAINT & LEAD CONTAINING PAINT

4.1 DEFINITIONS

4.2 FIELD AND LABORATORY SERVICES

4.3 LEAD ABATEMENT ACTIVITIES

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A – SAMPLE LOCATION PLANS

APPENDIX B – LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA

APPENDIX C – PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

APPENDIX D – QUALIFICATIONS OF CONCLUSIONS

Houser Walker Architecture October 25, 2019

Tuttle/Godbold Renovations NOVA Project Number 3019150

1.0 SUMMARY

NOVA Engineering and Environmental, LLC. (NOVA) has completed the Limited Pre-Renovation Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) and Lead Based Paint (LBP) Survey for the Tuttle/Godbold Building Renovations located in Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia (Subject Property). Field activities for the ACM and LBP survey at the Subject Property were performed on September 26, 2019.

A brief summary of our findings is presented below. This summary is provided for convenience and should not be substituted for review of the full report, including all attachments as provided herein.

1.1 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

During this study, sixty-one (61) samples (containing 90 total layers) of ceiling tile, plaster material, joint compound, glue dots, sink mastic, wallboard, glue material, floor tile, mastic material, felt, insulation, and duct cement were analyzed by NOVA using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), with six (6) analyzed samples indicating Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). A sample location plan is included in Appendix A of this Report.

Below is a summary of ACM identified at the Subject Property:

9-Inch Floor Tile

• A total of six (6) samples of the 9-inch floor tile located throughout the Tuttle building office space at the Subject Property indicated >1% asbestos (5% - 7% Chrysotile Asbestos). Consequently, we believe all of the 9-inch floor tile located at the Subject Property should be considered Asbestos Containing Material (ACM).

A complete list of suspected ACM samples obtained is shown in the laboratory report (included in Appendix B).

1.2 LEAD BASED PAINT & LEAD CONTAINING PAINT

Seventy-seven (77) X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer readings were made by NOVA throughout the interior and exterior of the Subject Property structure to determine the presence of Lead Based Paint (LBP).

Lead Based Paint

Lead Based Paint (LBP) is defined as a paint or varnish containing lead at a concentration >0.5% by weight when determined by laboratory analysis. LBP is also defined by HUD as 1.0 mg/cm2 when determined using an XRF analyzer.

• Painted surfaces of plaster wall, ceiling, and column components located at the Subject Property;

• Painted surfaces of metal safe components located at the Subject Property;

• Painted surfaces of wood window components located at the Subject Property.

Lead Containing Paint

OSHA does not define Lead Based Paint based on lead content. Any detectable lead in a paint or varnish makes it lead paint for purposes of complying with OSHA regulations to determine worker exposure. Consequently, for purposes of this study, Lead Containing Paint is considered any detectable level of lead.

The predominant LCP material identified by the NOVA survey include:

• Painted surfaces of wood windows, doors, frames, columns, beams, baseboards, and trim components located at the Subject Property;

• Painted surfaces of metal safe, pipe, and cabinet components located at the Subject Property.

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY

The Subject Property includes the Tuttle/Godbold Building Renovations located in Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia (Subject Property). Specifically, for the purposes of this Limited Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) and Lead Based Paint (LBP) Survey, the Subject Property includes Tuttle building chambers 216, 238, 434, and Godbold building 3rd floor break room.

2.2 PURPOSE

As requested by Houser Walker Architecture (CLIENT), the Limited Pre-Renovation

Asbestos Containing Material and Lead Based Paint Survey was performed in an effort to identify Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) and Lead Based Paint (LBP) at the Subject Property. This work has been performed in general accordance with applicable state and federal regulations, and routine industry practice.

ACM sampling was performed in general accordance with the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) guidelines and ASTM E2356-10,”Standard Practice for Comprehensive Building Asbestos Survey” as a Baseline Survey. Deviations from the Baseline Survey protocols include:

• Determination of ACM quantities were excluded from the scope of work

2.3 LIMITATIONS

NOVA has performed the Limited Pre-Renovation Asbestos Containing Material and Lead Based Paint Survey, which is a limited inquiry into a property's environmental status and is not sufficient to discover every potential source of ACM or LBP of the property to be evaluated. No survey/sampling can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential ACM or LBP in connection with a property. Performance of this practice is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for ACM and LBP in connection with a property.

The level of inquiry is variable. Not every property will warrant the same level of assessment for ACM and LBP building material. Consistent with good commercial or customary practices, the appropriate level of assessment will be guided by the type of property subject to assessment, the intended use of the property, the expertise and risk tolerance of the CLIENT, and the information developed in the course of the assessment.

NOVA's findings, opinions, conclusions and recommendations are based on information obtained through visual assessment of surficial conditions in readily accessible areas.

It is possible that additional ACM or LBP building material exist or may subsequently become known that may impact or change the assessment after NOVA's services are complete.

NOVA’s assessment represents our professional opinion, only. Therefore, NOVA cannot, under any circumstances, make a statement of warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that ACM and LBP are limited to those that are discovered while we are performing the Sampling.

2.4 USER RELIANCE

NOVA’s Limited Pre-Renovation Asbestos Containing Material and Lead Based Paint Survey, along with the findings and conclusions contained in the report, either in completed form, summary form, or by extraction, is prepared, and intended, for the sole use of Houser Walker Architecture (CLIENT) and therefore may not contain sufficient information for other purposes or parties. The CLIENT is the only intended beneficiary of this report. The contents of NOVA's report will continue to be the property of NOVA. NOVA's report may not be disclosed to, used by, or relied upon by, any person or entity other than the CLIENT without the express written consent of NOVA.

Authorization for disclosure to a third party or authorization for third-party reliance on a final report of any report will be considered by NOVA upon the written request of the CLIENT. NOVA reserves the right to deny authorization to allow disclosure or reliance of NOVA's report to third parties.

3.0 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

3.1 FIELD AND LABORATORY SERVICES

Mr. Curtis Moses, a NOVA professional and federal and state certified asbestos inspector, performed the field work for the Limited Pre-Renovation Asbestos Containing Material Survey at the Subject Property on September 26, 2019.

3.1.1 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL SAMPLING

The building area was visually assessed by NOVA to identify suspect ACM, which were then grouped into three categories according to their intended use:

• Surfacing Materials such as sprayed-on or troweled fireproofing, acoustical and decorative insulation, textured “popcorn” finishes, paint, stucco, etc.

• Thermal System Insulation (TSI), such as pipe, boiler and storage tank insulation, and insulation on ducts, pumps, heat exchangers, and other equipment.

• Miscellaneous Materials, such as floor and ceiling tiles, wallboard, asbestos-cement board, siding and other building materials that did not fall into one of the previously mentioned categories.

Where applicable, materials with similar texture, color and general appearance were considered homogeneous for sampling purposes, including visually similar materials on different floors. NOVA’s assessment also included touching representative samples to determine friability, a mechanical classification defined as whether a material can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

Bulk samples were subsequently obtained in general accordance with the AHERA (40 CFR 763.86, Sampling) and ASTM E2356-10 procedures. The samples were placed in appropriate containers, and the containers sealed and labeled with a unique identification number. The samples were subsequently transported (following routine industry practices and chain-of-custody procedures) to EMSL Analytical, LLC (EMSL) for analysis.

The ACM samples were analyzed for asbestos using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) methods in accordance with EPA Method 600/R-93/116. Copies of the complete asbestos laboratory report and chain-of custody are included in Appendix B.

Using the results of the laboratory analysis and NOVA’s visual assessment, the asbestos containing building materials can be further categorized into three groups:

• Friable ACM - Material means any material containing more than one percent (1%) asbestos as determined using the method specified in Appendix A, Subpart F, 40 CFR part 763 Section 1, Polarized Light Microscopy, that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

• Category I Nonfriable ACM - Asbestos-containing packing, gaskets, resilient floor covering, and asphalt roofing products containing more than one percent (1%) asbestos as determined using the method specified in Appendix A, Subpart F, 40 CFR part 763, Section 1, Polarized Light Microscopy.

• Category II Nonfriable ACM - Any material, excluding Category I Nonfriable ACM, containing more than one percent (1%) asbestos as determined using the methods specified in Appendix A, Subpart F, 40 CFR part 763, Section 1, Polarized Light Microscopy that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

During this study, sixty-one (61) samples (containing 90 total layers) of ceiling tile, plaster material, joint compound, glue dots, sink mastic, wallboard, glue material, floor tile, mastic material, felt, insulation, and duct cement were analyzed by NOVA using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), with six (6) analyzed samples indicating Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). A sample location plan is included in Appendix A of this Report.

Below is a summary of ACM identified at the Subject Property:

9-Inch Floor Tile

• A total of six (6) samples of the 9-inch floor tile located throughout the Tuttle building office space at the Subject Property indicated >1% asbestos (5% - 7% Chrysotile Asbestos). Consequently, we believe all of the 9-inch floor tile located at the Subject Property should be considered Asbestos Containing Material (ACM).

A complete list of suspected ACM samples obtained is shown in the laboratory report (included in Appendix B).

Determination of quantities of ACM at all locations should be made by the abatement contractor during a site inspection prior to beginning abatement.

4.0 LEAD BASED PAINT & LEAD CONTAINING PAINT

4.1 DEFINITIONS

Lead Based Paint (LBP) is defined as a paint or varnish containing lead at a concentration >0.5% by weight when determined by laboratory analysis, (1972, Lead Based Paint Poison Prevention Act (LBPPPA)). LBP is also defined by HUD as 1.0 mg/cm2 when determined using x-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer. These concentrations are applicable for housing and child-care facilities; however, these concentration levels are also frequently used as targets in commercial projects to allow flexibility in future area usage.

Lead Containing Paint (LCP) was defined as a paint or varnish containing lead at a concentration >0.06% by weight (600 ppm) when determined by laboratory analysis, (1978, LBPPPA). In 2009, LCP was further defined as containing lead at a concentration >0.009% by weight (90 ppm) for certain consumer products and residential use.

Please note that OSHA does not define Lead Based Paint based on lead content. Any detectable lead in a paint or varnish makes it lead paint for purposes of complying with OSHA regulations to determine worker exposure. Consequently, for purposes of this study, Lead Containing Paint is considered any detectable lead.

4.2 FIELD AND LABORATORY SERVICES

Mr. Curtis Moses, a NOVA professional and EPA certified lead inspector, performed the field work for the Lead Based Paint Survey at the Subject Property on September 26, 2019.

Seventy-seven (77) X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer readings were made by NOVA throughout the interior and exterior of the Subject Property structure to determine the presence of Lead Based Paint (LBP).

4.2.1 LEAD BASED PAINT SAMPLING

Where applicable, materials with similar texture, color and general appearance were considered homogeneous for sampling purposes, including visually similar materials on different floors and/or different buildings.

NOVA’s XRF readings are presented below:

No. Time Units Component Substrate Side Condition Color Room Results PbC Error

1 9/26/2019 9:19 cps 0.97 0

2 9/26/2019 9:51 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1.2 0.2

No. Time Units Component Substrate Side Condition Color Room Results PbC Error

3 9/26/2019 9:51 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1.2 0.2

4 9/26/2019 9:52 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1.1 0.1

5 9/26/2019 9:53 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster C intact tan 238 negative < LOD 0.03

6 9/26/2019 9:54 mg / cm ^2 trim wood D intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

7 9/26/2019 9:54 mg / cm ^2 baseboard wood B intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

8 9/26/2019 9:55 mg / cm ^2 baseboard wood C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

9 9/26/2019 9:55 mg / cm ^2 baseboard wood C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

10 9/26/2019 9:56 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster B intact tan 238 positive 22.2 6.9

11 9/26/2019 9:57 mg / cm ^2 trim wood D intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

12 9/26/2019 9:57 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall B intact tan 238 negative < LOD 0.03

13 9/26/2019 9:58 mg / cm ^2 door wood B intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

14 9/26/2019 9:58 mg / cm ^2 door wood B intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

15 9/26/2019 9:59 mg / cm ^2 ceiling plaster B intact tan 238 positive < LOD 33.45

16 9/26/2019 9:59 mg / cm ^2 ceiling plaster B intact tan 238 positive < LOD 28.65

17 9/26/2019 10:00 mg / cm ^2 column plaster A intact tan 238 positive 2.6 1.4

18 9/26/2019 10:00 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan 238 positive < LOD 25.65

19 9/26/2019 10:00 mg / cm ^2 trim wood A intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

20 9/26/2019 10:01 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown 238 negative < LOD 0.03

21 9/26/2019 10:01 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown 238 negative < LOD 0.03

22 9/26/2019 10:02 mg / cm ^2 cabinet metal A intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

23 9/26/2019 10:02 mg / cm ^2 baseboard metal C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

24 9/26/2019 10:03 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.41

25 9/26/2019 10:03 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.13

26 9/26/2019 10:03 mg / cm ^2 window metal C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

27 9/26/2019 10:04 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan 238 positive < LOD 24.45

28 9/26/2019 10:04 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall C intact tan 238 negative < LOD 0.03

29 9/26/2019 10:05 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.09

30 9/26/2019 10:05 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.04

31 9/26/2019 10:06 mg / cm ^2 window metal C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

32 9/26/2019 10:30 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan 238 positive < LOD 5.1

33 9/26/2019 10:31 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.34

34 9/26/2019 10:31 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 216 negative < LOD 0.08

35 9/26/2019 10:32 mg / cm ^2 ceiling plaster C intact tan 216 positive < LOD 6.15

36 9/26/2019 10:33 mg / cm ^2 door wood B intact brown 216 negative < LOD 0.03

37 9/26/2019 10:33 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown 216 negative < LOD 0.03

38 9/26/2019 10:34 mg / cm ^2 trim wood D intact brown 216 negative < LOD 0.03

39 9/26/2019 10:34 mg / cm ^2 trim wood D intact brown 216 negative < LOD 0.03

40 9/26/2019 10:35 mg / cm ^2 ceiling plaster A intact tan 216 positive < LOD 33.75

41 9/26/2019 10:35 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact brown 216 negative < LOD 0.03

42 9/26/2019 10:36 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster C intact tan 216 positive < LOD 30.45

43 9/26/2019 10:36 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan 216 positive < LOD 30.3

44 9/26/2019 10:37 mg / cm ^2 cabinet wood A intact white 216 negative < LOD 0.03

No. Time Units Component Substrate Side Condition Color Room Results PbC Error

45 9/26/2019 10:37 mg / cm ^2 safe metal A intact white 216 positive 2.9 1.6

46 9/26/2019 10:38 mg / cm ^2 safe plaster A intact white 216 negative < LOD 0.03

47 9/26/2019 10:38 mg / cm ^2 safe metal B intact white 216 negative < LOD 0.45

48 9/26/2019 10:38 mg / cm ^2 cabinet metal C intact brown 216 negative 0.29 0.19

49 9/26/2019 10:39 mg / cm ^2 cabinet metal C intact brown 216 negative 0.4 0.2

50 9/26/2019 10:54 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall C intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.03

51 9/26/2019 10:54 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall D intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.03

52 9/26/2019 10:54 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall D intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.03

53 9/26/2019 10:55 mg / cm ^2 column wood C intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.06

54 9/26/2019 10:56 mg / cm ^2 beam wood C intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.05

55 9/26/2019 10:57 mg / cm ^2 pipe metal C intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.06

56 9/26/2019 10:58 mg / cm ^2 ceiling wood A intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.03

57 9/26/2019 10:58 mg / cm ^2 ceiling wood A intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.03

58 9/26/2019 10:59 mg / cm ^2 door metal A intact brown br350 negative < LOD 0.03

59 9/26/2019 10:59 mg / cm ^2 door metal A intact brown br350 negative < LOD 0.03

60 9/26/2019 14:01 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact white 434 negative < LOD 0.36

61 9/26/2019 14:01 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown 434 negative < LOD 0.03

62 9/26/2019 14:02 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 434 negative < LOD 0.6

63 9/26/2019 14:03 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 434 negative < LOD 1.18

64 9/26/2019 14:03 mg / cm ^2 window metal C intact white 434 negative < LOD 0.03

65 9/26/2019 14:03 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan 434 positive < LOD 27.3

66 9/26/2019 14:04 mg / cm ^2 ceiling plaster A intact tan 434 positive < LOD 38.85

67 9/26/2019 14:04 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster C intact tan 434 negative < LOD 0.03

68 9/26/2019 14:05 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 434 negative < LOD 0.41

69 9/26/2019 14:05 mg / cm ^2 door wood B intact white 434 negative < LOD 0.03

70 9/26/2019 14:06 mg / cm ^2 door wood B intact white 434 negative < LOD 0.03

71 9/26/2019 14:06 mg / cm ^2 baseboard wood A intact white 434 negative < LOD 0.48

72 9/26/2019 14:07 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall D intact tan 434 negative < LOD 0.03

73 9/26/2019 14:08 mg / cm ^2 trim wood B intact tan 434 negative < LOD 0.25

74 9/26/2019 14:11 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan 434 negative < LOD 0.03

75 9/26/2019 14:13 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1.1 0.1

76 9/26/2019 14:14 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1.1 0.1

77 9/26/2019 14:15 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1.1 0.1

< LOD = below level of detection

Lead Based Paint

Lead Based Paint (LBP) is defined as a paint or varnish containing lead at a concentration >0.5% by weight when determined by laboratory analysis. LBP is also defined by HUD as 1.0 mg/cm2 when determined using an XRF analyzer.

• Painted surfaces of plaster wall, ceiling, and column components located at the Subject Property;

• Painted surfaces of metal safe components located at the Subject Property;

• Painted surfaces of wood window components located at the Subject Property.

Lead Containing Paint

OSHA does not define Lead Based Paint based on lead content. Any detectable lead in a paint or varnish makes it lead paint for purposes of complying with OSHA regulations to determine worker exposure. Consequently, for purposes of this study, Lead Containing Paint is considered any detectable level of lead.

The predominant LCP material identified by the NOVA survey include:

• Painted surfaces of wood windows, doors, frames, columns, beams, baseboards, and trim components located at the Subject Property;

• Painted surfaces of metal safe, pipe, and cabinet components located at the Subject Property.

4.3 LEAD ABATEMENT ACTIVITIES

The US EPA has stated that solid architectural components coated with LBP are less likely to be hazardous because of the small ratio of lead paint to total waste mass (US EPA, 1993, Applicability of RCRA Disposal Requirements to Lead-Based Paint Abatement Wastes, Final Report, EPA 747-R-93-006 Technical Programs Branch, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, March 1993). The US Army conducted a study which concluded that whole-building demolition debris is not likely to exceed the toxicity characteristic standard for lead if it is handled as a single, whole waste stream and disposed of all together (US Dept. of the Army, US Army Environmental Hygiene Agency, Interim Final Report, Lead-Based Paint Contaminated Debris Waste Characterization Study No. 27-26-JK44-92. May 1993). Consequently, whole-building demolition debris is typically considered a non-hazardous waste with regard to lead under RCRA.

We believe the greatest impact of LBP and/or LCP may be on the contractor’s salvage activities of railing, doorframes, etc.., particularly activities that include cutting, grinding, sanding or scraping. As previously noted, OSHA does not define lead paint based on content. Any detectable lead in paint makes it lead paint for purposes of complying with OSHA regulations to determine worker exposure.

• The contractor must conduct an initial exposure assessment of all workplaces and operations where lead or lead-containing material are being used, disturbed or removed to determine whether any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level.

• Personnel involved in LBP or LCP must be monitored and directed by a Competent Person who will determine appropriate compliance controls and procedures.

• The Lead in Construction standard's action level is 30 ug/m3 calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average.

In addition, on April 22, 2008, EPA issued a rule requiring the use of lead-safe practices and other actions aimed at preventing lead poisoning. Under the rule, beginning April 22, 2010, contractors performing abatement, renovation, repair and painting projects that disturb lead-based paint in homes, child care facilities, and schools (K-12) built before 1978 must be certified by EPA and must follow specific lead-safe work practices to prevent lead contamination.

Persons performing lead-based paint (LBP) abatement activities must:

• Be certified

• Work for a Certified Lead Firm

Persons performing renovation work must:

• Be a certified Renovator

• Work for a Certified Renovation Firm

The EPA and the also regulate the LBP and LCP waste stream resulting from abatement and renovation activities. A potential lead waste material must be analyzed for toxicity using the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP).

• If TCLP results from waste stream of paint chips, dust (including dust from floor refinishing operations), soil, and/or stripper sludge are less than 5 milligrams per liter (5 parts per million or ppm), the waste may usually go to a municipal solid waste (MSW) or construction debris (CD) landfill, depending on concentrations and landfill operator requirements.

• If greater than 5 milligrams per liter (5 ppm) must comply with Georgia State Rules for Hazardous Waste Management

Please note that the means and methods necessary for LBP and/or LCP abatement, as well as worker protection and monitoring, are the sole responsibility of the contractor.

APPENDIX A

SAMPLE LOCATION PLANS

SAMPLE LOCATION PLAN

Chambers 216

HOUSER WALKER ARCHITECTURE

Tuttle/Godbold Renovations Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia

NOVA Project Number 3019150

Asbestos Containing Material

Non Asbestos Containing Material

Lead Based Paint

Lead Containing Paint

No Detect

216-CTG-23

216-CTG-24

216-P-27

216-P-28 216-P-29

216-C-31216-C-30

216-W-33

216-W-32

216-JC-36

216-JC-35

216-JC-34

216-FT-38

216-FT-37

216-G-40

216-G-39

49 48

Chambers 238

HOUSER WALKER ARCHITECTURE

Tuttle/Godbold Renovations Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia

NOVA Project Number 3019150

Asbestos Containing Material

Non Asbestos Containing Material

Lead Based Paint

Lead Containing Paint

No Detect

238-CT-2

238-CT-1238-P-3

238-P-5

238-P-4

238-JC-6

238-JC-7

238-JC-8

238-G-10

238-G-9

238-SM-12

238-SM-11

238-W-13238-W-14

238-FT-17

238-FT-18

238-GL-16

238-GL-15

238-CT-22

238-CT-21

238-C-20

238-C-19

10 11

19 22

252423

30 29

Godbold 3rd Floor Break Room

HOUSER WALKER ARCHITECTURE

Tuttle/Godbold Renovations Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia

NOVA Project Number 3019150

Asbestos Containing Material

Non Asbestos Containing Material

Lead Based Paint

Lead Containing Paint

No Detect

BR350-FT-41 BR350-FT-42

BR350-JC-43

BR350-JC-44

BR350-JC-45

BR350-W-46

BR350-W-47

BR350-CB-49

BR350-CB-48

Chambers 434

HOUSER WALKER ARCHITECTURE

Tuttle/Godbold Renovations Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia

NOVA Project Number 3019150

Asbestos Containing Material

Non Asbestos Containing Material

Lead Based Paint

Lead Containing Paint

No Detect

434-JC-51

434-JC-52

434-JC-53

434-P-54 434-P-56

434-P-55

434-C-57

434-C-58

434-FT-59

434-C-58

434-FT-50

434-CT-60

434-CT-61

434-W-62

434-W-63

62 63

APPENDIX B

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

2205 Corporate Plaza Parkway SE, Suite 200 Smyrna, GA 30080

Tel/Fax: (770) 956-9150 / (770) 956-9181 http://www.EMSL.com / atlantalab@emsl.com

071908208EMSL Order:

Customer ID: NOVA30

Customer PO: 3019150

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Curtis Moses (678) 982-5576

Fax:Nova Engineering & Environmental, Inc. (770) 425-1113

Received Date:3900 Kennesaw 75 Parkway 09/26/2019 3:00 PM

Analysis Date:Suite 100 10/01/2019 - 10/02/2019

Collected Date:Kennesaw, GA 30144

Project: 3019150

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

238-CT-1

071908208-0001

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)35%Cellulose

Min. Wool

60%

5%

Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile- Entry

238-CT-2

071908208-0002

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)35%Cellulose

Min. Wool

60%

5%

Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile- At

Chambers

238-P-3-Skim Coat

071908208-0003

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster- Entry

238-P-3-Base Coat

071908208-0003A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster- Entry

238-P-4-Skim Coat

071908208-0004

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster- At Chambers

238-P-4-Base Coat

071908208-0004A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster- At Chambers

238-P-5-Skim Coat

071908208-0005

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster- Hall

238-P-5-Base Coat

071908208-0005A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster- Hall

238-JC-6

071908208-0006

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound-

Entry

238-JC-7

071908208-0007

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound- At

Chambers

238-JC-8

071908208-0008

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound- Hall

238-G-9

071908208-0009

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Glue Dots-

Main

238-G-10

071908208-0010

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Glue Dots-

Main

238-SM-11

071908208-0011

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Cellulose10%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Sink Mastic- Break

Room

238-SM-12

071908208-0012

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Cellulose10%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Sink Mastic- Break

Room

238-W-13

071908208-0013

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Wallboard- Hall

Initial report from: 10/02/2019 13:35:00

Page 1 of 6ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 10/2/2019 1:35 PM

Tel/Fax: (770) 956-9150 / (770) 956-9181 http://www.EMSL.com / atlantalab@emsl.com

071908208EMSL Order:

Customer ID: NOVA30

Customer PO: 3019150

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

238-W-14

071908208-0014

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Wallboard- Main

238-GL-15-Carpet

071908208-0015

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)40%Synthetic60%Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Carpet Glue-

Chambers

238-GL-15-Glue

071908208-0015A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Carpet Glue-

Chambers

238-GL-16-Carpet

071908208-0016

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)40%Synthetic60%Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Carpet Glue- Hall

238-GL-16-Glue

071908208-0016A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Carpet Glue- Hall

238-FT-17-Floor Tile

071908208-0017

7% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)93%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Floor Tile W/ Mastic-

Main

238-FT-17-Mastic

071908208-0017A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Floor Tile W/ Mastic-

Main

238-FT-17-Felt

071908208-0017B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Floor Tile W/ Mastic-

Main

238-FT-18-Floor Tile

071908208-0018

7% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)93%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Floor Tile W/ Mastic-

Hall

238-FT-18-Mastic

071908208-0018A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Floor Tile W/ Mastic-

Hall

238-FT-18-Felt

071908208-0018B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Floor Tile W/ Mastic-

Hall

238-C-19-Wrap

071908208-0019

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Various

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Insulation/

Cement- Above Grid

238-C-19-Insulation

071908208-0019A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Glass80%Pink

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Insulation/

Cement- Above Grid

238-C-20-Wrap

071908208-0020

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Brown

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Insulation/

Cement- Above Grid

238-C-20-Silver layer

071908208-0020A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Silver

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Insulation/

Cement- Above Grid

238-CT-21

071908208-0021

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Brown

Fibrous

Homogeneous

12x12 C.T. Ceiling

238-CT-22

071908208-0022

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Brown

Fibrous

Homogeneous

12x12 C.T. Ceiling

216-CTG-23-Ceiling Tile

071908208-0023

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Brown

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile W/ Glue

Dots- Main

216-CTG-23-Glue

071908208-0023A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile W/ Glue

Dots- Main

Page 2 of 6ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 10/2/2019 1:35 PM

Tel/Fax: (770) 956-9150 / (770) 956-9181 http://www.EMSL.com / atlantalab@emsl.com

071908208EMSL Order:

Customer ID: NOVA30

Customer PO: 3019150

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

216-CTG-24-Ceiling Tile

071908208-0024

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Brown

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile W/ Glue

Dots- Entry

216-CTG-24-Glue

071908208-0024A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile W/ Glue

Dots- Entry

216-CT-25

071908208-0025

See CT1 2'x2' CT- Main

216-CT-26

071908208-0026

See CT61 2'x2' CT- Entry

216-P-27

071908208-0027

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster- Ceiling- Main

216-P-28

071908208-0028

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster- Ceiling- End

216-P-29

071908208-0029

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster- Ceiling-

Judges

216-C-30-Mastic

071908208-0030

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Cement/

Insulation- Above Grid

216-C-30-Insulation

071908208-0030A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose

Glass

70%

10%

Various

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Cement/

Insulation- Above Grid

216-C-31-Mastic

071908208-0031

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Cement/

Insulation- Above Grid

216-C-31-Insulation

071908208-0031A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)30%Cellulose70%Various

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Cement/

Insulation- Above Grid

216-W-32

071908208-0032

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Wallboard- At Hall

216-W-33

071908208-0033

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Wallboard- At Hall

216-JC-34

071908208-0034

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound-

Side Room

216-JC-35

071908208-0035

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound-

Main

216-JC-36

071908208-0036

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound- At

Hall

216-FT-37-Floor Tile

071908208-0037

6% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)94%Brown

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

9" Floor Tile W/

Mastic- Main Under

Carpet

216-FT-37-Mastic 1

071908208-0037A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

9" Floor Tile W/

Mastic- Main Under

Carpet

216-FT-37-Mastic 2

071908208-0037B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

9" Floor Tile W/

Mastic- Main Under

Carpet

Page 3 of 6ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 10/2/2019 1:35 PM

Tel/Fax: (770) 956-9150 / (770) 956-9181 http://www.EMSL.com / atlantalab@emsl.com

071908208EMSL Order:

Customer ID: NOVA30

Customer PO: 3019150

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

216-FT-38-Floor Tile

071908208-0038

5% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)95%Brown

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

9" Floor Tile W/

Mastic- Main Under

Carpet

216-FT-38-Mastic 1

071908208-0038A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

9" Floor Tile W/

Mastic- Main Under

Carpet

216-FT-38-Mastic 2

071908208-0038B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

9" Floor Tile W/

Mastic- Main Under

Carpet

216-G-39

071908208-0039

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Carpet Glue- Safe

216-G-40

071908208-0040

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Carpet Glue- Safe

BR350-FT-41-Floor Tile

071908208-0041

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12x12 Tan W/ Glue-

Main

BR350-FT-41-Mastic

071908208-0041A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12x12 Tan W/ Glue-

Main

BR350-FT-42-Floor Tile

071908208-0042

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12x12 Tan W/ Glue-

Main

BR350-FT-42-Mastic

071908208-0042A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12x12 Tan W/ Glue-

Main

BR350-JC-43

071908208-0043

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound-

Front

BR350-JC-44

071908208-0044

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound-

Side

BR350-JC-45

071908208-0045

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound- End

BR350-W-46

071908208-0046

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Wallboard- Front

BR350-W-47

071908208-0047

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Wallboard- Side

BR350-CB-48

071908208-0048

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Cove Base Glue-

Front

BR350-CB-49

071908208-0049

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Cove Base Glue- Side

434-JC-51

071908208-0050

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound- End

Room

434-JC-52

071908208-0051

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound- End

Room

434-JC-53

071908208-0052

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Joint Compound- End

Room

Page 4 of 6ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 10/2/2019 1:35 PM

Tel/Fax: (770) 956-9150 / (770) 956-9181 http://www.EMSL.com / atlantalab@emsl.com

071908208EMSL Order:

Customer ID: NOVA30

Customer PO: 3019150

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

434-P-54-Skim Coat

071908208-0053

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster- Main

434-P-54-Base Coat

071908208-0053A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster- Main

434-P-55

071908208-0054

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster- Hall

434-P-56-Skim Coat

071908208-0055

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster- End Room

434-P-56-Base Coat

071908208-0055A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster- End Room

434-C-57-Mastic

071908208-0056

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Cement- Above

Grid

434-C-57-Wrap

071908208-0056A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)30%Cellulose70%Brown

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Cement- Above

Grid

434-C-57-Insulation

071908208-0056B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Glass80%Pink

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Cement- Above

Grid

434-C-58-Mastic

071908208-0057

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Cement- Above

Grid

434-C-58-Wrap

071908208-0057A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Brown

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Cement- Above

Grid

434-C-58-Insulation

071908208-0057B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Glass80%Pink

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Duct Cement- Above

Grid

434-FT-59-Floor Tile

071908208-0058

7% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)93%Brown

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

9" Floor Tile- Below

Carpet- Chambers

Result includes a small amount of inseparable attached material

434-FT-59-Felt

071908208-0058A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

9" Floor Tile- Below

Carpet- Chambers

434-FT-50-Floor Tile

071908208-0059

7% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)93%Brown

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

9" Floor Tile- Below

Carpet- Chambers

Result includes a small amount of inseparable attached material

434-FT-50-Felt

071908208-0059A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose80%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

9" Floor Tile- Below

Carpet- Chambers

434-CT-60

071908208-0060

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)35%Cellulose

Min. Wool

60%

5%

Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile 2x2- Main

434-CT-61

071908208-0061

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)35%Cellulose

Min. Wool

60%

5%

Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Ceiling Tile 2x2- At

Hall

434-W-62

071908208-0062

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Wallboard- Chambers

Page 5 of 6ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 10/2/2019 1:35 PM

Tel/Fax: (770) 956-9150 / (770) 956-9181 http://www.EMSL.com / atlantalab@emsl.com

071908208EMSL Order:

Customer ID: NOVA30

Customer PO: 3019150

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

434-W-63

071908208-0063

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Wallboard- Admin.

Analyst(s)

Anthony Sanaie (76)

Violedah Richardson (14)

Michael Murphy or Other Approved Signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim

Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non -friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc Smyrna, GA NVLAP Lab Code 101048-1

Page 6 of 6ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 10/2/2019 1:35 PM

OrderID: 071908208

No. Time Units Component Substrate Side Condition Color Room Results PbC Error

1 9/26/2019 9:19 cps 0.97 0

2 9/26/2019 9:51 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1.2 0.2

3 9/26/2019 9:51 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1.2 0.2

4 9/26/2019 9:52 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1.1 0.1

5 9/26/2019 9:53 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster C intact tan 238 negative < LOD 0.03

6 9/26/2019 9:54 mg / cm ^2 trim wood D intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

7 9/26/2019 9:54 mg / cm ^2 baseboard wood B intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

8 9/26/2019 9:55 mg / cm ^2 baseboard wood C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

9 9/26/2019 9:55 mg / cm ^2 baseboard wood C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

10 9/26/2019 9:56 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster B intact tan 238 positive 22.2 6.9

11 9/26/2019 9:57 mg / cm ^2 trim wood D intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

12 9/26/2019 9:57 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall B intact tan 238 negative < LOD 0.03

13 9/26/2019 9:58 mg / cm ^2 door wood B intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

14 9/26/2019 9:58 mg / cm ^2 door wood B intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

15 9/26/2019 9:59 mg / cm ^2 ceiling plaster B intact tan 238 positive < LOD 33.45

16 9/26/2019 9:59 mg / cm ^2 ceiling plaster B intact tan 238 positive < LOD 28.65

17 9/26/2019 10:00 mg / cm ^2 column plaster A intact tan 238 positive 2.6 1.4

18 9/26/2019 10:00 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan 238 positive < LOD 25.65

19 9/26/2019 10:00 mg / cm ^2 trim wood A intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

20 9/26/2019 10:01 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown 238 negative < LOD 0.03

21 9/26/2019 10:01 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown 238 negative < LOD 0.03

22 9/26/2019 10:02 mg / cm ^2 cabinet metal A intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

23 9/26/2019 10:02 mg / cm ^2 baseboard metal C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

24 9/26/2019 10:03 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.41

25 9/26/2019 10:03 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.13

26 9/26/2019 10:03 mg / cm ^2 window metal C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

27 9/26/2019 10:04 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan 238 positive < LOD 24.45

28 9/26/2019 10:04 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall C intact tan 238 negative < LOD 0.03

29 9/26/2019 10:05 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.09

30 9/26/2019 10:05 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.04

31 9/26/2019 10:06 mg / cm ^2 window metal C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.03

32 9/26/2019 10:30 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan 238 positive < LOD 5.1

33 9/26/2019 10:31 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 238 negative < LOD 0.34

34 9/26/2019 10:31 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 216 negative < LOD 0.08

35 9/26/2019 10:32 mg / cm ^2 ceiling plaster C intact tan 216 positive < LOD 6.15

36 9/26/2019 10:33 mg / cm ^2 door wood B intact brown 216 negative < LOD 0.03

37 9/26/2019 10:33 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown 216 negative < LOD 0.03

38 9/26/2019 10:34 mg / cm ^2 trim wood D intact brown 216 negative < LOD 0.03

39 9/26/2019 10:34 mg / cm ^2 trim wood D intact brown 216 negative < LOD 0.03

40 9/26/2019 10:35 mg / cm ^2 ceiling plaster A intact tan 216 positive < LOD 33.75

41 9/26/2019 10:35 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact brown 216 negative < LOD 0.03

42 9/26/2019 10:36 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster C intact tan 216 positive < LOD 30.45

43 9/26/2019 10:36 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan 216 positive < LOD 30.3

44 9/26/2019 10:37 mg / cm ^2 cabinet wood A intact white 216 negative < LOD 0.03

45 9/26/2019 10:37 mg / cm ^2 safe metal A intact white 216 positive 2.9 1.6

46 9/26/2019 10:38 mg / cm ^2 safe plaster A intact white 216 negative < LOD 0.03

47 9/26/2019 10:38 mg / cm ^2 safe metal B intact white 216 negative < LOD 0.45

48 9/26/2019 10:38 mg / cm ^2 cabinet metal C intact brown 216 negative 0.29 0.19

49 9/26/2019 10:39 mg / cm ^2 cabinet metal C intact brown 216 negative 0.4 0.2

50 9/26/2019 10:54 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall C intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.03

51 9/26/2019 10:54 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall D intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.03

52 9/26/2019 10:54 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall D intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.03

53 9/26/2019 10:55 mg / cm ^2 column wood C intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.06

54 9/26/2019 10:56 mg / cm ^2 beam wood C intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.05

55 9/26/2019 10:57 mg / cm ^2 pipe metal C intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.06

56 9/26/2019 10:58 mg / cm ^2 ceiling wood A intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.03

57 9/26/2019 10:58 mg / cm ^2 ceiling wood A intact white br350 negative < LOD 0.03

58 9/26/2019 10:59 mg / cm ^2 door metal A intact brown br350 negative < LOD 0.03

59 9/26/2019 10:59 mg / cm ^2 door metal A intact brown br350 negative < LOD 0.03

60 9/26/2019 14:01 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact white 434 negative < LOD 0.36

61 9/26/2019 14:01 mg / cm ^2 door wood A intact brown 434 negative < LOD 0.03

62 9/26/2019 14:02 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 434 negative < LOD 0.6

63 9/26/2019 14:03 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 434 negative < LOD 1.18

64 9/26/2019 14:03 mg / cm ^2 window metal C intact white 434 negative < LOD 0.03

65 9/26/2019 14:03 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan 434 positive < LOD 27.3

66 9/26/2019 14:04 mg / cm ^2 ceiling plaster A intact tan 434 positive < LOD 38.85

67 9/26/2019 14:04 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster C intact tan 434 negative < LOD 0.03

68 9/26/2019 14:05 mg / cm ^2 window wood C intact white 434 negative < LOD 0.41

69 9/26/2019 14:05 mg / cm ^2 door wood B intact white 434 negative < LOD 0.03

70 9/26/2019 14:06 mg / cm ^2 door wood B intact white 434 negative < LOD 0.03

71 9/26/2019 14:06 mg / cm ^2 baseboard wood A intact white 434 negative < LOD 0.48

72 9/26/2019 14:07 mg / cm ^2 wall drywall D intact tan 434 negative < LOD 0.03

73 9/26/2019 14:08 mg / cm ^2 trim wood B intact tan 434 negative < LOD 0.25

74 9/26/2019 14:11 mg / cm ^2 wall plaster A intact tan 434 negative < LOD 0.03

75 9/26/2019 14:13 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1.1 0.1

76 9/26/2019 14:14 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1.1 0.1

77 9/26/2019 14:15 mg / cm ^2 test positive 1.1 0.1

< LOD = below level of detection

APPENDIX C

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

NICKOLAUS DASANTOS

Environmental Business Unit Manager

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Mr. DaSantos is a Manager with NOVA’s Environmental Group in Kennesaw, Georgia. Mr. DaSantos has experience as an environmental consultant performing all aspects of Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site

Assessments (ESAs), Risk Hazard Assessments (RHAs), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Assessments, Georgia Environmental Policy Act (GEPA) Assessments, Prospective Purchaser Corrective Action Plans (PPCAPs), Hazardous Site Response Act (HSRA) Notifications, Brownfield Applications, Compliance Status Reports (CSRs), Oversight for the assessment, excavation, removal and remediation of Underg round Storage Tanks (USTs), and the installation of soil borings/groundwater monitoring wells, surface and groundwater sampling, soil sampling, multi-incremental soil sampling, stockpile soil sampling, Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) sampling, Mold Assessments, Radon Assessments, Radon Mitigation Design, Radon Mitigation Installation

Oversight, biocell construction/remediation, and Vapor Intrusion Assessments, Vapor Intrusion Mitigation (VIMS)

Design, Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System Installation Oversight.

Mr. DaSantos is experienced in performing pre-renovation/pre-demolition asbestos inspections, lead based paint inspections, mold inspections, as well as large asbestos, lead based paint, and hazardous materials abatement oversight projects.

Mr. DaSantos is also experienced in assessment and remediation of hazardous waste sites impacted by chlorinated solvents, petroleum hydrocarbons, and other chemical substances released into the environment.

Mr. DaSantos has knowledge of state and federal environmental programs and government regulations, including RCRA, HSRA, CERCLA, UST/LUST, AHERA, ASHARA, and OSHA.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE

Municipal/Government

Asbestos Inspection,…