RFP S-40400-00011842 ATTACHMENT F - Definitions.pdf
PDF 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Financial Case Management System (COTS) (SaaS)
- Solicitation number
- S-40400-00011842
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an attachment titled "DEFINED SOLICITATION TERMS" that defines key terminology related to a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the Oregon Office of Public Defense Services (OPDS) for a Financial and Case Management System (FCMS). The RFP seeks a Solution that will modernize the agency's existing system, with activities including configuration, third-party integration, and implementation. Key roles include Contractor, Key Personnel, and Workers. The RFP outlines the evaluation process, desired deliverables, and contractual terms.
The pricing and funding details are not explicitly provided in this attachment. However, the document indicates the Contract will be awarded to the selected Proposer, and the Statement of Work will outline the payment schedule for deliverables and milestones. The RFP does not mention any set-asides, incumbents, or specific funding sources.
View the file
Other files
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT G: DEFINED SOLICITATION TERMS
1. “Agency” means OPDC.
| 2. “Authorized | Representative” | means | a | person | representing | a | party | to | the | RFP | ||
| and | Contract | who | is | authorized | to | make | commitments | and | decisions | on | behalf | of |
| the | party | regarding | the | performance | of | the | Contractor | within | the | RFP | and |
Contract.
| 3. “Configuration” | means | the | creation | of | a | comprehensive | collection | of | settings | |||
| and | values | that | are | referenced | by | the | software | system | to | deliver | required | |
| functionality. | Configuration | does | not | lead | to | a | forked | code | base, | and | an | existing |
| configuration | may | be | easily | applied | to | a | new | or | updated | base | system. |
| 4. “Contract” | means | the | agreement | entered | between | Agency | and | Contractor | |||
| through | which | Contractor | provides | the | System | and | the | required | Services | for | the |
| benefit | of | the | Agency. |
5. “Contractor” means the Proposer selected for Contract award.
| 6. “Customization” | means | the | modification | of | an | existing | base | software | system | for | ||||
| the | unique | needs | of | the | Agency | in | such | a | way | that | the | changes | require | forked |
| (separate | and | ongoing) | maintenance | and | testing | from | that | required | for | the | base | |||
| system, | i.e., | a | forked | or | separate | code | base. |
| 7. “Deliverables” | means | all | Services | and | Work | Product | Contractor | is | required | to |
| deliver | to | the | Agency | under | the | RFP | and | negotiated | Contract. |
| 8. “Documentation” | means | all | documents, | including | documents | that | are | ||||
| Deliverables | described | in | a | Statement | of | Work, | and | which | may | include | operator’s |
| and | user’s | manuals, | training | materials, | guides, | commentary, | listings, | ||||
| requirements | traceability | matrices | and | other | materials | for | use | in | conjunction | ||
| with | and | for | the | operation | of | the | Services. | Documentation | includes | documents | in |
| hard | copy | or | electronic | form. |
| 9. “Employee” | pursuant | to | the | Governor | of | the | State | of | Oregon’s | Executive | Order | ||
| 21-29 | (EO-21-29), | means | any | person | employed | by | the | Executive | Branch, | but | |||
| does | not | include | individuals | whose | only | work | for | the | Executive | Branch | is | as | a |
| volunteer | board, | commission, | or | council | member, | and | whose | compensation | is | ||||
| limited | to | a | stipend | or | per | diem. | “Employee” | does | not | include | elected | or | |
| appointed | District | Attorneys | or | Workers. |
| 10. “Evaluation | Committee” | means | the | Evaluators | and | Advisers | selected | to | |||
| participate | in | the | evaluation | of | the | Responsive | Proposals | received | based | on | the |
| evaluation | criteria | set | forth | in | the | RFP. |
11. “FCMS” means Financial and Case Management System.
| 12. “Implementation” | means | the | activities | related | to | integrating | the | Goods, | ||||
| Services, | or | their | related | components | into | the | workflow | and | data | flow | of | The |
| Agency | to | achieve | the | desired | outcomes | of | the | Project. |
| 13. “Key | Person” | means | Personnel | deployed | in | any | of | the | following | roles: | |
| management | or | leadership, | particular | subject | matter | experts, | or | in | any | role | that |
| includes | the | authority | to | directly | or | indirectly | plan | and | control | particular | activity |
| relevant | to | a | project | or | enterprise. |
| 14. “Modernization” | is | the | practice | of | leveraging | technology | to | meet | expanding | ||
| business | needs | and | goals | to | exist | and | compete | in | today’s | digital | environment. |
15. “OPDS” means the Oregon Office of Public Defense Services.
| 16. “Personnel” | means | the | Contractor’s | employees, | subcontractor(s), | affiliates, | joint | ||||
| venture | partners, | or | team | members; | and | consultants | engaged | by | any | of | those |
| entities; | and | may | include | Workers. |
17. “Program” means the OPDS FCMS.
18. “Proposal” means a Proposer’s submittal in response to this RFP.
| 19. “Proposer” | means | an | individual, | corporation, | business | trust, | partnership, | limited | |
| liability | company, | association, | joint | venture, | government, | public | corporation | or | other |
| legal | or | commercial | entity | that | has | submitted | a | Proposal. |
| 20. “Responsible” | means | the | Proposer | has | met | the | standards | of | responsibility | identified |
| in | ORS | 279B.110. |
21. “Responsive” means a Proposal that complies with the requirements of the RFP.
22. “RFP” means Request for Proposals.
| 23. “Services” | means | all | effort | to | be | expended | by | Proposer | as | set | forth | in | the | Scope | of |
| Work | of | the | RFP. |
24. “Solution” is defined in RFP Section 1.1.
25. “SPC” means the Single Point of Contact for the RFP.
| 26. “Statement | of | Work” | or | “SOW” | means | the | draft | document | that | describes | the | product | |
| and | services | likely | to | be | provided | by | the | awarded | Proposer | under | a | Contract | including |
| the | tasks, | deliverables | and | milestones, | the | measurable | attributes | of | each | deliverable, | |||
| identification | of | the | deliverables | and | services | that | are | associated | with | each | task | and | a |
| completion | date | for | each | milestone | and | deliverable, | the | payment | schedule | for | each | ||
| deliverable | and | milestone, | and | any | other | items | as | agreed | by | the | parties | including | |
| amendments | to | the | agreement. |
27. “State” means the State of Oregon.
| 28. “System” | is | a | collection | of | software | and/or | application | functionalities | working | |||||
| together | to | produce | an | outcome. | This | may | be | a | Commercial | Off | the | Shelf | (“COTS”) | |
| System, | or | an | integrated | custom | system. | For | example, | a | system | may | be | comprised | of | a |
| single | COTS | technology | or | many | COTS | technologies | working | together | to | produce | a | set | ||
| of | functionalities. |
29. “Task” means a segment of the Services to be provided by Proposer under the Contract.
| 30. “Third-Party | Integration” | means | the | inclusion | by | the | Contractor | of | a | software | |||
| system | or | subsystem | that | is | owned | or | maintained | by | a | third | party, | including | open- |
| source | software | or | licensed | software. | Third-party | integration | is | typically | used | to | |||
| provide | well-defined | functionality | using | a | best | of | breed, | existing | solution. |
| 31. “Worker”, | pursuant | to | EO- | 21-29, | means | an | individual | who | is | not | an | Employee, | and | is | |
| engaged | to | provide | goods | or | services | to | the | Executive | Branch | through | any | formal | or | ||
| informal | agreement, | whether | compensated | or | uncompensated. | Individuals | are | ||||||||
| exempt | from | the | definition | of | Worker | unless | any | provision | of | the | agreement | to | provide | ||
| goods | or | services | requires | work | to | be | performed | in | person | and | on | site | at | an | Executive |
| Branch | worksite, | regardless | of | frequency, | whether | other | persons | are | present, | or | any | ||||
| contingent | nature | of | that | requirement. |
32. “Written” means required format intended to be read or used as a reference.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .