Q A's II.pdf

PDF 174 KB Posted

Attached to
309TH MAINTENANCE WING (309 MXW) EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPORT
Solicitation number
Reference-Number-FA822408REQUIP
Issued by

About this file

Additional Q A's

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Q A's III.pdf PDF
RFP Q A's pdf.pdf PDF
PWS 7 July 2009.pdf PDF
Sample Questionnaire Cover Letter.pdf PDF
SECTION L 03 SEP 2009.pdf PDF
RFP FA8224-09-R-0004.pdf PDF
Past Performance Info sheet 15 Apr 09 —
Equipment Rates TEP Worksheet 9 June 2009 LOCKED.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Consent Letter 6 July 2009.pdf PDF
Team List Roles Responsibilities 9 Jun 09.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Utah wage determination.pdf PDF
Past Performance Questionnaire 9 Jun 2009.pdf PDF
Section M 27 August 2009.pdf PDF
Client Authorization Letter 6 July 2009.pdf PDF
Notice to Industry - Requirement Update.docx DOCX document
DraftRFPNotice20090416.pdf PDF
DRAFT Equipment Rates TEP Worksheet 20090416.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Past Performance Info sheet 15 Apr 09.doc DOC document
DRAFT SECTION M 14 Apr 09.pdf PDF
DRAFT Past Performance Questionnaire 15 April 2009.doc DOC document
DRAFT Performance Work Statement 9 Apr 09.pdf PDF
DRAFT Team List Roles Responsibilities 06 Apr 09.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Solicitation FA8224-09-R-0004 —
DRAFT SECTION L 8 Apr 09.pdf PDF
Q and A 24 Feb.pdf PDF
Vendor Notice 20090213.pdf PDF
DraftRFPNotice20081229.pdf PDF
DRAFT Team List Roles Responsibilities.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Wage Determination Revised 6-18-2008.pdf PDF
DRAFT Sample Questionnaire Cover Letter.pdf PDF
DRAFT SECTION L 22 Dec 2008.pdf PDF
DRAFT Consent Letter.pdf PDF
DRAFT Performance Work Statement 23 December 2008.pdf PDF
Equipment Rates TEP Worksheet 20081209.xls XLS spreadsheet
DRAFT Past Performance Questionnaire 22 dec 08.pdf PDF
DRAFT Client Authorization Letter.pdf PDF
DRAFT Past Performance Info sheet.pdf PDF
DRAFT SECTION M 22 Dec 08.pdf PDF
DRAFT Solicitation FA8224-09-R-0004.pdf PDF
AFMCI21-127.pdf PDF
AFI10-701.pdf PDF
Instruction.pdf PDF
AFI21-101_AFMCSUP_I.pdf PDF
PWS 6 May 2008.pdf PDF
AllQuestionsandAnswers.pdf PDF
SmallBusinessSetAsideNotice.pdf PDF
SectionsLandMposted3March2008.pdf PDF
IndustryDayBriefing11February2008.pdf PDF
IndustryDayAttendanceSheet.pdf PDF
DRAFTLaborCategories.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 61 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Q: In section 9.2 of the PWS Can contractors defer the handling of hazmat to the base hazmat group for identification, removal, disposal, and storage?

A: No, hazardous materials include things such as paints, solvents, caulk, etc. These items need to be handled in accordance with paragraph 9 of the PWS and are the sole responsibility of the contractor. Hazmat extracted from equipment shall be disposed of in accordance with the task order PWS meaning that the contractor may be instructed to put it in the appropriate government containers.

Q: Regarding labor ratios in the "Trades", will all bidding entities be required to follow Federal ratios for example: one (1) apprentice electrician with one (1) journeyman electrician OR follow

Utah State ratios; for example: two (2) apprentice electricians with one (1) journeyman electrician?

A: All labor requirments will be held to the Utah State Ratios.

Q: Will this ratio be enforced by the government at each job site?

A: This will be an inspectable item in the performance plan.

Q: Does the government have intentions to separate journeyman and apprentice labor categories for plumbers as it has for electricians, or to bid these labor categories at a single "average" rate which includes both apprentice and journeymen using the ratios in question #1?

A: The "journeyman" rate for each category will establish Not-To-Exceed rates for the basic contract. This will facilitate adjustments under the Service Contract Act (SCA) since there is only one rate per labor category established for the SCA published rates. On the individual task orders, contract awardees could bid lower rates than the basic contract rates based upon the mix of labor they anticipate will be required to accomplish that task order. For example, if electrical work for a given task order will require two journeyman electrician and one apprentice, then they could weight the "electrician" rate for the task order accordingly. This would allow contract awardees to be as competitive as they would like to be on task orders, but still facilitate SCA adjustments if they are deemed applicable.

Q: The contractor shall provide all required red-lined drawings, schematics, software codes, parts lists, training, O&M manuals, and recommended changes to applicable Technical Orders to the QAP at completion of the project but before final inspection. Will major pieces of equipment be purchased by the contractor or by the government. If by the government, then is the contractor responsible to procure software codes, parts lists, training, O&M manuals and applicable Technical Orders for new equipment when they have no part in purchasing of same?

If purchased seperately, how shall the contractor obtain operator and maintenance training on equipment that is purchased by a seperate entity?

A: Equipment will not be purchased under this contract. The contractor will not be responsible for procuring codes, parts lists, training, O&M manuals and applicable Technical Orders for new equipment. This contract is for equipment support and may require installation, set-up, or modification of equipment and associated systems. Example - In the case that a contractor is awarded a task to set up a new piece of equipment or modify an existing piece of equipment

(purchased by the government), when set-up or modification is complete, the contractor will share with the government any lessons learned during the installation/modification as well as turnover all manuals, notes, drawings, etc associated with the installation or modification.

Q: For those companies which sub contract the "Riggers" portion, is it acceptable for the Prime to ensure the sub contractor has the proper level of insurance which meets the government requirement?

A: The prime contractor is ultimately responsible for the services provided under this contract.

How Government equipment is insured while it is in the prime contractors possession is up to prime contractor, so long as the insurance meets the minimum requirements of the contract.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .