Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
Demolition of Building 5022 & 1906 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA301022R0004
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for evaluation of contractors on a federal contract. It requests evaluation of a contractor's performance on metrics such as providing experienced managers, effective quality control, timely resolution of issues, adherence to schedules, and responsiveness to changes. Respondents are asked to provide ratings on a scale and explanations for marginal or unsatisfactory ratings. It also asks whether the contractor would be awarded future contracts based on past performance and whether they are included in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System. This appears to be an attachment used to evaluate contractors for future award eligibility and selection.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Demolition of Building 5022 & 1906, newest first.
File Type Posted
B5022 Asbestos Report.pdf PDF
Tree Protection Guidance.pdf PDF
Integra CT30 Locks.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers - Demolition 11 Jan 2022.pdf PDF
FA301022R00040004.pdf PDF
1906 ACM Survey Notes.pdf PDF
1906 HA Sheet.pdf PDF
Demo. Heritage and VQ Buildings- Addendum #1.docx DOCX document
B1906 Asbestos Report.pdf PDF
Demo B5022 and B1906 Site Visit Sign In 6 January 2022.pdf PDF
Q and A - Demolition_3 Jan 2022.pdf PDF
Amendment 003--SF 30.pdf PDF
Site Visit Information_3 Jan 2022.pdf PDF
Environmental Management Contractor Packet_Sep 2021.pdf PDF
Site Visit Information_30 Dec 2021.pdf PDF
Q and A - Demo_30 Dec 2021.pdf PDF
Amendment 002--SF 30.pdf PDF
MAHG211035 - Drawings.pdf PDF
MAHG211035 - Specifications.pdf PDF
MAHG211035 - Demolition Hertiage Bldg B1906 SOW.pdf PDF
MAHG211035 Demolition Heritage Bldg B1906 MSS.xls XLS spreadsheet
FA301022R00040001.pdf PDF
Demo B5022 and B1906 Site Visit sign in.pdf PDF
MAHG211036_Demo B5022_MSS.xls XLS spreadsheet
WD 15-5147_Rev 15_dated 20 OCT 2021.pdf PDF
Notice of Compliance.pdf PDF
3 Line Reference - Past Performance Reference List.pdf PDF
MAHG211036_Demo B5022_SOW.docx DOCX document
SF 1444.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA301022R0004.pdf PDF
MAHG211036_Demo B5022_Drawings.pdf PDF
Specifications and Submittals Procedures.pdf PDF
Show all 32

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 7

FA301022Q0003

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________*

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________

_____________________________ Fax Number: _____________________

_____________________________ Email Address: _____________________

C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: 81st Contracting Squadron, Keesler AFB, MS

Attn: SSgt Lovely Herndon

Fax # 228-377-3298 Email: lovely.herndon@us.af.mil & 81CONS.LGCB.Construction@us.af.mil mailto:maxwell.watanga.1@us.af.mil

Attachment

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, VG, S, M, U, and N?A) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.

PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E VG S M U N/A

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Applicable

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Unable to provide a rating.

Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available.

Do not know.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: E VG S M U N/A

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their

Attachment 7

The contractor: E VG S M U N/A quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules.

14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

15. Was responsive to contract changes.

16. Provided adequate project supervision.

17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” YES/NO

23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

24. Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________

Remarks:______________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .