Paint IDIQ ATTACHMENT 5-Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Painting IDIQ Maxwell AFB and Gunter Annex 2026 - AMENDMENT 2
Solicitation number
FA330026R0020
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire template issued by the 42d Contracting Squadron for RFP FA330026R0020. The questionnaire is designed to collect performance evaluation information from points of contact regarding a contractor being considered for a painting services contract at Maxwell/Gunter Air Force Base, AL, Lake Martin recreational site, and Vigilant Warrior training site.

The questionnaire contains four main sections requesting contract identification details (contractor name, CAGE code, contract number, contract type, program title, period of performance, dollar value, and work description); customer or agency identification and geographic scope of work performed; respondent identification including name, title, contact information, tenure on the subject contract, and responsibilities; and performance information using a six-point rating scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable). The performance evaluation criteria assess the contractor's ability to develop realistic schedules, provide experienced personnel, control subcontractor performance, ensure timely payments, maintain quality control, submit documentation, identify and resolve problems, manage change orders, and complete closeout activities. The questionnaire also requires responses regarding whether the contractor received cure or show cause notices, liquidated damages assessments, and whether the respondent would recommend future contract awards. Completed questionnaires should be returned via email to Ms. Shamekia Williams or Mr. Eldrae Perdue. The document is marked as source selection sensitive under FAR 2.101 and 3.104 once completed.

View the file

Other files

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 5

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SUBJECT: Request for Current and Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation from . This firm is currently being considered for a contract with the Government to Paint various locations across Maxwell/Gunter Air Force

Base, AL, Lake Martin recreational site, and Vigilant Warrior training site.

A member of the Past Performance team will be contacting you to telephonically complete the attached questionnaire. If you have any questions concerning this request contact Ms.

Shamekia Williams at shamekia.williams.1@us.af.mil or Mr. Eldrae Perdue at eldrae.perdue@us.af.mil.

Thank you, Eldrae Perdue

Contracting Officer

42d Contracting Squadron

WHEN FILLED IN, THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IN

ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 2.101 and 3.104 mailto:shamekia.williams.1@us.af.mil mailto:eldrae.perdue@us.af.mil

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised):

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised):

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing a check in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Place a check in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: E V S M U N/A

1. Developed realistic progress schedules and completed the project within the establish schedule.

2. Provided an experienced superintendent with the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements.

3. Adequately controlled performance of subcontractors.

4. Paid Subcontractors/suppliesr in a timeley manner.

5. Provided effective quality control which resulted in a quality finished product.

6. Provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.

7. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems.

8. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.

9. Provided timely resolution of punch list items and closeout documentation.

10. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

11. Was the contractor assessed liquidated damages?

12. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

Explanations/Remarks:__________________________________________________________________________

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-mail to: shamekia.williams.1@us.af.mil and eldrae.perdue@us.af.mil mailto:shamekia.williams.1@us.af.mil mailto:eldrae.perdue@us.af.mil

from:
through:
through_2:
Subcontractor: Off
Key Personnel: Off
ExplanationsRemarks 1:
ExplanationsRemarks 2:
ExplanationsRemarks 3:
ExplanationsRemarks 4:
Date:
Text2:
Text3:
Text4:
Text5:
Text6:
Text7:
Text8:
Text9:
Text10:
Text11:
Text12:
Text13:
Text14:
Text15:
Check Box16: Off
Check Box17: Off
Check Box18: Off
Text19:
Text20:
Text21:
Text22:
Text23:
Text24:
Text25:
Text26:
Check Box27: Off
Check Box28: Off
Check Box29: Off
Check Box30: Off
Check Box31: Off
Check Box32: Off
Check Box33: Off
Check Box34: Off
Check Box35: Off
Check Box36: Off
Check Box37: Off
Check Box38: Off
Check Box39: Off
Check Box40: Off
Check Box41: Off
Check Box42: Off
Dropdown43: [ ]
Dropdown44: [ ]
Dropdown45: [ ]
Check Box47: Off
Check Box48: Off
Check Box49: Off
Check Box50: Off
Check Box51: Off
Check Box52: Off
Check Box53: Off
Check Box54: Off
Check Box55: Off
Check Box56: Off
Check Box57: Off
Check Box58: Off
Check Box59: Off
Check Box60: Off
Check Box61: Off
Check Box62: Off
Check Box63: Off
Check Box64: Off
Check Box65: Off
Check Box66: Off
Check Box67: Off
Check Box68: Off
Check Box69: Off
Check Box70: Off
Check Box71: Off
Check Box72: Off
Check Box73: Off
Check Box74: Off
Check Box75: Off
Check Box76: Off
Check Box77: Off
Check Box78: Off
Check Box79: Off
Check Box80: Off
Check Box81: Off
Check Box82: Off
Check Box83: Off
Check Box84: Off
Text85:
Text86: RFP FA330026R0020

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .