5)_2010-12-13_SCA_HazMat_Report.pdf

SUMMARY REPORT: BULK ASBESTOS, LEAD-BASED

PAINT AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY

ALCATRAZ CELLHOUSE - CITADEL LEVEL

GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATIONAL AREA

SAN FRANGISCO, GALIFORNIA

PREPARED FOR:

MR. DANIEL EILBECK

WISS JANNEY ELSTNER ASSOCIATES INC.

2000 PowELL $TREET, SUITE 1650

EMERWILLE, CA 94608

PREPARED BY:

SCA

eruvrnorufo=r\rAl, lNc.

334 1gTH STREET.

OAKLAND, CA94612

TEL: (510) 645-6200

eFAX: (415) 962-0736

SCA PROJECT NO.: B-9873.AS

DECEMBER 13, 2O1O

SIJMMARY REPORT

BI]LKASBESTOS, LEAD-BASED PAINT & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY

ALCATRAZ CELLHOUSE _ CITADEL LEVEL

GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATIONAL AREA

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

CONDUCTED FOR

MR. DANIEL EILBECK

WISS JANNEY ELSTNER ASSOCIATES INC.

2000 PowELL STREET, SUITE 1650

EMERYVTLLE, C494608

DECEMBER 13,2010

SCA PROJECT NO. B-9873.4S

PREPARED BY:

GLENN R. CASS, CIH, PE, C^C #92-0092

VICE PRESIDENT

scA ENVTRONMENTÄL, rNC.

334 19ÏE STREET

OAKLAND, CA94612

TEL: (s10) 645-6200 eFAX: (415) 962-0736

Summary Report for Asbestos and Lead Paint Survey Alcatraz Cellhouse Citadel Level, Golden Gate National Recreational Area, San Francisco, CA a"O ,ro."., *o..,_n'^ paoe i

Table of Contents

3.1 Asbestcts Containing Materials '.'.........'......'...'4

3.2 Lead-Based Paints ........... .......'..4

3.3 Lead-Contaminated Soils & BulkAnalysess,.............. .'.'....'.4

4.1 Asbestos_Cont¿ining Materials

4.2 Lead-Based Paints ........... .'.....'...5

5.0 Results and Conc1usions................. '............'

5.2 Non-Asbestos Materials (non-ACM).. ....'.'

5.3 Lead-Based Paints ........... .'...".10

5 .4 Lead Contaminated Soils & Butk Analyses ................., ......... ' '..'.'.'.. '..... '. I I

6.0 Limitations and Exc1usions................,... ..".....'

Attachments

l. Laboratory Results - Asbestos

2. Representative Lead-Based Paint XRF Sampling Results

3. Soil Sampling Results

4. Field Data Sheets

5. Sampling Location Drawings

6. Previous Asbestos Sampling Results

7. Previous Lead Bulk Sampling Results

8. Remedial Action Alte¡ratives

Alcatraz'cellhouse citadel Level, Golden Gate National Recreational Area, san Francisco, cA

Paqe ii

List of Common Acronyms and Abbreviations

AJA,{ : Assumed Asbestos-Containing Materials

ACM : Asbestos-Containing Materials AHERA : Asbestos HazardEmergency Response Act BAAQMD : the Bay Area Air Qualþ Management District

BK : black paints

Bt : blue paints

BR : brownpaints CAC : Certifred Asbestos Consultant

CaVOSHA : the California Division of Industrial Safety and Health

CaVEPA : the California Environmental Protection Agency

CAULK : window and doorperimeter caulking

CCR : California Code of Regulations

CERCLA : Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

CFR : Code of Federal Regulations

CHMM : Certified Hazardous Materials Manager

CIH : Certified Industrial Hygienist CPSC : Consumer Product Safety Commission

CR : cream-colored Paints CSST : Certified Site Surveillance Technician

DOHS : the California Department of Health Services

DSIPLM : Polarized Light Microscopy with Dispersion Staining

EpA : the U.S. payj¡snmental Protection Agency

EPRI : Electric Power Research Institute

E)GJNT : expansion joint FIFRA : Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act

FLVCS : linoleum flooring FLVCT : vinyl composite floor tiles # : square feet

GN : green Paint-s GROUT : ceramic tile and concrete grouts

GY : grayPaints

HIID : the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

LBP : Lead-Based Paints

LF : linear feêt

¡t"g/ct* : micrograms per centimeter squared

ILC\C : microgram per gram or equivalent to parts per million pglm3 = micrograms per cubic meter rm : microns mglcrÊ : milligrams per squared centimeter mg/xg : milligrams Per kilogram MR : maroon paints

OL : olive paints

OR : orange Paints osHA : the federal occupational Safety and Health Administration

OW : off white paints

PCB : Polychlorinated BiphenYl

PEL : Permissible ExPosure Level Penta : PentachloroPhenol

Summary Report for Asbestos and Lead Palnt Survey

ÃË"iä'C.iifioúte Citadet tevel, èãi¿en Gate National Recreational Area, San Francisco, CA

PISTM

PK

ppm

PUTTY

QA/QC

RCRA

Rcw

RD

REA

RFAG

RTPTCH

RFROLL

RWQCB

SF

TN

TSI

WAC

WH

WLCER .

WLPL

YW

List of Common Acronyms and Äbbreviations Cont'

: steam thermal system pipe insulation : pinkpaints : parts per million : windowpane putly : Qualify Assurance/Quaüty Control : Resource Conservation Recovery Act : Regulated Controlled Waste : red paints : Registereä Envi¡onmental Assessor : built-up tar and gravel roofing : roof patching comPounds : rolled roofing : the Regional Water Quãlity Control Board

- square feet : tan paints : Thennal System Insulation : Washinefon Admiùistrative Code : white paints : ceramic walltiles : wall plaster : yellow paints

Alcatraz Óellhouse Citadel Level, Golden Gate National Recreational Area, San Francisco, CA

Paoe I

1.0 Executive SummarY

SCA Environmental, Inc. (SCA) conducted apafüalpre-renovation hazardous materials survey for lead-based paints, asbestos-containing construction materials, and associated environmental hazards at the Alcatraz Cellhouse Citadel

Level at Golden Gate National Recreational Area i¡ San Francisco, CA (hereafter referred to as "the Building") on

Tuesday, November 16, 2010.

Prior to any renovations or demolition, the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) mandated by the Envi¡onmental Protection Agency (EPA) and locally enforced by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) require that buildings be inspected for asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and materials subject to damage or which will be made friable, be removed.

Sampling by SCA in November 2010 found the following ACM:

. None identif,red at the Citadel Level.

Sampling by Cal Inc. in November 2002 simila¡ly found all tested substrates in the Citadel to be non-4sbestos (see

Attachment 6): -

"Ttaee" asbestos-containing materials (>0.1% and<lo/o asbestos byweight) sampled by SCA include:

. None identified for the Citadel Level.

Non-asbestos materials sampled and documented by SCA i¡clude:

. Gray mortars at Citadel brick construction [SCA Sample I.D. CIT-MORTAR-101-1 thru 3].

. Red brick at Citadel partially painted [SCA Sample I.D. CIT-BRICK-102-1 thru 3].

. Wall plasters at interior cells on masonry walls at Citadel Level [SCA Sample I.D. CIT-WLPL-103-1 thru 3 and Cal Inc. Sample I.D. 01 thru 031.

. Concrete beams with brick aggregate and white surface paints ISCA Sample I.D. CIT-CONC-104-I thru 3 and Cal Inc. Sample I.D. 04 thru 061.

o Unpainted concrete and brick floors throughout Citadel areas fSample I.D. CONC-]N\T].

Lead-based paints (LBP), as defined by U.S. Deparbnent of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), were identifred in the building, including but not necessarily limited to the following:

o Blue and green paints at interior cell door frames on the Citadel Level [GR-03-1 8.BL-04-I & 2 with >5.0 mflcn2l.

. White pai:rts on fueplace bricks at interior cells at the Citadel Level ISCA Sample I.D' WH-01-6 with 1'2 mglcrll.2l.

¡ White paints on plaster wall across from the fireplace il interior cells at Citadel Level ISCA Sample I.D.

WH-01-7 with >5.0 m¡el cú1.

See Attachment2 for a suÍrmary of tested painted substrate ¡esults. Also included within the Summary Table are lead bulk sampling results compiled by Cal Inc. and RGA Envi¡onmental, Inc. :m2002 and2003, respectively'

Most other tested paints and ceramic ftle glazng have a lead content below the HIID def,rnition for LBPs' All site paints shall be treaied as having a lead content greater than 600 ppm requiring demolition dust controls and personal protective procedures in compliance with CaVOSIIA's Construction Lead Standard, 8 CCR 1532'l-

In general, any interior and exterior paints found to be peeling and chipping will require stabilization or scraping prior to the proposed renovations or demolition. All intact painted substrates may be removed and disposed of as non-hazardous 'ffaste.

Alcatraz'Cellhouse Citadel Level, Golden Gate National Recreational Area, San Francisco, CA

,"0" , In addition to the XRF sampling, SCA collected bulk samples of the brick and concrete with brick aggregate substrates to verifu the potential lead content ofthe masonry. Both samples found negligible lead concentrations at

1.6 and 8.3 ppm, respectivelY.

Soil samples were collected using a hand trowel at the south and east facades to determine the potential level of contamjnation of exposed soils immediately under loose and peeling exterior paints. Both samples were analyzed fot total lead by EpA Method SV/ 6010, which is perforrred using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission

,p""t o."opy. All samples were analyzed by McCampbell Analytical Inc.'s California Department of Public Health

E^nvironmentalLabor{tory Accreditation Program (ElAP)-accredited laboratory (ELAP #1644). Reporting limits for lead in soil for EPA Method SW 6010 is 5 mg/kg (5 ppm).

Surface soils were fo¿nd to have a total threshold lead concentration of 3,100 and 830 ppm, respectively' The eastern garden sample has an elevated lead concentration exceeding the CallEPA Tttle 22 standards, classifiing it as a hazardous waste. Both samples were above the EPA and HUD standard of 400 ppm for children play areas, indicating that some remediation of drip line soils will be necessary'

Alcatraz-cellhouse c¡tadel Level, Golden Gate National Recreational Area, San Francisco, cA

Paoe 3

2.0 Introduction

This report suÍìmarizes the results of the fulI demolition hazardous materials survey conducted Ncabraz Cellhouse at

Golden Gate National Recreational Area in San Francisco, CA (hereafter referred to as "the Building") on June 1, 2010. The pu{pose of the survey was to determine the presence of regulated and./or potentially bazardous building materials inìtre Uuit¿ing, which is slated for demolition. Materials addressed in the survey include:

o Asbestos-containingmaterials(ACM);

. Lead-based paints (LBP);

. Lead content inbrick and concrete withbrick aggregate substrates;

o Lead content at exterior drip line at soils; and

. Other environmentalhazards as noted.

Individuals involved in the s¡rvey, and their technical certifications, i¡clude:

The contract laboratory that provided analytical services for the project was:

Laboratory Asbestos TEM Laboratory, Berkele¡ CA

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)

¡ National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (N\¡LAP # 101891-0).

o CaliforniaEnvironmental Laboratory Accreditation Prosram (ELAP).

McCampbell Analytical, Inc. Lead Soil & Bulk Subbtrate Analyses

. CaliforniaEnvironmentalLaboratory Accreditation Prosram (ËLAP #1644).

pre-renovation lead-based paint and representative soil and wipe sampling were conducted at the Citadel site and throughout the majority of the cellblo ck n 2002 by Cal Inc. Sampling n 2002 showed a high concentration of lead o., -ãoy of the painteá wa[s and paint chips at the based on the walls throughout the Citadel. Partial stabilization and remediation has occurred within the Citadel to remediate surface lead concentrations previously measured at 510 to 4,000 pglSF in Nove mbet 2002 [Cal Inc. Sample I'D. C-4 úru C-8].

Despite the presence of elevated wipe samples and loose and peeling paints in 2002, aßborte lead concentrations were all found to be under the NAAQS standard of 1.5 pgl#, indicating that when left undisturbed, the presence of lead hazards poses minimal impact to infrequent occupants. Airborne lead concentrations in the Citadel and

Cellblockrangld tott <0:77 to it.1 pglm3 inNovember 2002lCaIInc. Sample I.D. PbO1 thru Pb05l'

General cleanup and remediated occurred in January-February 2003 by Miller Thompson Constructors to include surface vacuuming. Current conditions on-site are considered fairly simila¡ within the Citadel today as the post-remediation conditions found in 2003.

Role

Glenn R. Cass, PE, CIH, CAC

Senior Consultant . Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC #92-0092);

. Certified Industrial Hygienist (CftI#A4847);

. California Dept. of Public Health Certified Lead

Inspector/Assessor, Project Designer & Project Monitor (DHS #r/DÀ4-717);

. Professional (Mechanical) Engineer (PE #Ml8976), since r978;. OSHA 40-hr. HAZWOPER Trainingper 29 CFR 191.120;

. Registered Environmental Assessor (REA-06164); and . Radiation Safetv Specialist (Scitec & Niton XRF's)'

Alcatraz-cellhouse citadel Level, Golden Gate National Recreational Area, San Francisco, CA

Paqe 4 SCA Proiect No.: 8-9873

3.0 MethodologY

3.1 Asbestos Containinq Materials

Asbestos sampling was performed in a fastrion designed to minimize exposure of the surveyor.or others to airborne asbestos frbers. Sãmples were typically removed from the substrate utilizng a knife or hollow drill bit bored through a wet sponge; the ìample mâierial was then placed into an airtight plastic vial. The vial's exterior was decontaminated with u -át ,porrg", and a unique sample I.D. written on the vial. The vial was then stored in a plastic bag. Sample substrates were patihed with a high-temperatur€ caulking compound, where required.

Samples of suspect materials were collected using triplicate sampling procedures. Under these procedures, the hrst ru*it" is analyzed. If it tests positive for asbestos (>lyo), the anaþis is suspended for further samples of that matårial. If the f1¡st sample tests only trace positive (between 0.I to 7%o), or negalive, then the second and thi¡d samples arc analyzed sequentjally, in order to deterrnine the possible presence of asbestos. If all three samples test

'r"gåti,u., the matenal is óonsiderèd as non-asbestos. If one or more samples test "trace" positive (<Io/o), the material is considered to be trace positive. If one or more samples are positive for asbestos, the material is considered positive.

Certain materials, such as plasters and gypboard or sheetrock syst€ms, are frequently non-homogeneous in content.

For such materials, multipie samples were gathered at various points in the buitding, with all samples analyzed to determine the possible presence of asbestos'

All asbestos samples collected were submitted to ATEM for analysis by polarized light microscopy with dispersion staining (DS/?LM). The Bay Area Ai¡ Quality Management District's (BAAQMD), the Federal Environmental protectloà Agenc/s (EpA), and California Environmental Protection Agency's (CaVEPA) regulations all specify the

DSIPLM method.

3.2 Lead-Based Paints

Construction records or drawings concerning paints in the buildings were not available. Paint samples from different exterior surfaces were analyzel ín-situ to identify the presence and extent of lead-containing paints. This included samples from exterior frnishes tlroughout the building. Samples werc analyzed using a Niton XL-700 X-Ray

Fluorescence Q(RF) spectrum analyzér. The XRF analyzer can measure lead contents of several layers of paint without disturbing tie surfaces, thus giving immediate feedback on lead çontents of paint without destructive testing.

The XRF is sensitive to 0.1 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) of lead, or well below HUD guideline levels of 1 .0 mglcm2 of lead in paints.

XRF analysis data are reported as L-shell values. The L-shell value is the lower energy fluorescence showing the level of fhe surface layàr that is readily disturbed and potentially made airborne, thereby posing a potential constructi on h ealth hazar d.

please note that although LBP were defined against the HUD standard, CaVOSHA's Construction Lead Standard, 8

CCR 1532.1, applies to alt paints with any measured lead content, requiring dust control measures to reduce ai¡bome and ingestion lead dust hazards.

3.3 Lead-Contaminated Soils & Bulk Anabtses

Soil samples were collected using a hand trowel at the south and east facades to deterrnine the potential level of contamination of exposed soils immediately under loose and peeling exterior paints. Both samples were analyzed for total lead by EpA Method SV/ 6010, which is performed using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. A1l samples were analyzed by McCampbell Analytical Inc.'s California Department of Public Health

ÉnvironmentalLaboratory Accreditation Program (ElAP)-accredited laboratory (ELAP #1644)' Reporting limits for lead in soil for EPA Method SW 6010 is 5 mg/kg (5 ppm).

Alcatraz'cellhouse citadel Level, Golden Gate National Recreational Area, san Francisco, cA

Paoe 5SGA Proiect No.: 8-9873

4.0 Applicable Standards

4.1 Asbestos-ConJq!.n!.nLlu[si[9Llglt

ACM is defined by EPA regulations as those substances containing greater than l%o asbestos. The BAAQMD and the CallqpAprovide local enforcement of these regulations. Friable ACM with greater than l%o asbestos needs to be disposed of as asbestos waste.

prior to demolition of a building, the BAAQMD requires abatement of Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials

RACM þractically, this means all friable and non-friable ACM).

RACM is defhed as (a) Friable - the material can be crumbled, pulverized o¡ reduced to powder by hand pressure,

(b) Category 1 that are subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrasion, (c) Category I materials that becomes friable during demolition or renovation activities, or (d) Category II materials that become friable during demolition or renovatioû activities.

Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administratiòns (OSHA) regulations, locally enforced by CAL/OSHA, defines ACNI as substances that contain greater Ihan I%o asbestos. CaVOSHA also mandates special training, medical exams, personal protective equipment and record keeping for employees working with ACM. If a material contains less than 1% asbèstos but more than 0.1%o asbestos, the material may be disposed of as non-ACM, but the

CaVOSHA requirements would still have to be followed regarding workers'protection and Contractor licensing'

"Trace" materials are currentþ regulated in Califonria and require the following:

r Removal using wet methods;

. Prohibition of removal using abrasive saws or methods which would aerosolize the material;

o Prompt clean-up of the impactedzone,using HEPA-filtered vacuums, as applicable;

o Employer registration by CaVOSHA for removal quantities exceeding 100 sq. ft. per year; and r CaVOSIIA Carcinogen Registration by the Demolition or Abatement Contractor impacting such materials.

Further detail regarding various California asbestos regulations can be found from the following websites:

. http://www.dir.ca.eov/title8/1529.html

. http://www. ciwmb.ca. gov/reeulations/title 14lch3 5.htrn

. htto://www.baaqmd. gov/dst/¡egulations/rg 1 1 02.pdf

¡ htÞ ://www. epa. sov/asbestos/pubs/help'html o http://www. epa. eov/asbestos/pubs/asbre g.hhnl

4 2 Lead-Based Pqints

Since elemental lead is a suspect carcinogen and known teratogen and neurotoxic in high doses, lead-containing materials need to be identified prior'to the on-set of demolition activities. Using combinations of engineering controls and personal protective equipment, lead-containing materials can be remediated safely, Several sources of applicable standards are listed as follows:

Alcatraz ôellhouse Citadel Level, Golden Gate NatioÀal Recreational Area, San Francisco' CA

l. Occupational Exposure: Lead exposures in th€ worlqplace are regulated by CaVOSHA, which has certain regulatory requirements foì identi$ring and controlling potential iead exposures. Currentþ applicable regulâtions for the construction industry have been adopted by CaVOSHA (8 CCR

I'5i21) f¡om the Federal OSH+ regulations. The current OSHA 8-hour Permissible Exposure rcvel (rnt) for lead is 50 pglm3'

2, Lead Waste: The regulatory standards disposal inconsistent, and continually fluctuating, to consistent whether the trend is for a more or less c A myria regulatory standards exist characteizng land use planning objectives and hazardous waste disposal requirements.

In Califomia, effective from January I, lggg to July l,2006,1oose and peeling LBP or other wastes require characterization and testing for leachability, following the standards noted below:

a. If the Total Th¡eshold Level Concentration (TTLC) is <50 ppm, it is considered non-

RCRA, non-hazardous waste since it is impossible to exceed the WET test limit of 5 mgll using the 10 to I ratio.

b. If the TTLC is <350 ppm and the WET test is <5 mgll then the waste has low leachability and is classif,red non-RCRA non-hazardous wast€'

c. If the TTLC is >350 ppm and the WET test is <5 mgll then if agan has low leachability and is classif,red as non-RCRA, non-hazardous waste'

d. If the TTLC is >350 ppm and the V/ET test results are >5 mgll, then the TCLP must be run. Then if the TCLÞls >5 mg/l the waste must be stabilized and if <5-mg/l stabilization is not required. Whether stabilized or not, both conditions are classified as RCRA hazardous waste.

The 350 ppm limit under Health & Safety Code $25157.8 sunset on July 1,2006 and reverted to the previous 1,000 ppm TTLC limit identihed under Title 22 ç6626L34' Nevertheless, SCA recommends mainta^ining the 350 ppm standard for waste characteizalion purposes as the likelihood of this level being reestablished is high' please note that in the above scenario, loose and peeling paints are treated as a separate waste stream; whereas, intact paints may be combined for disposal purposes and classified as

.architectural *urt".' This has allowed for disposal of painted concrete in a Class 3 landfill for many years without limitations. In essence, the total weight of the paint versus the weight of a concrete substrate for intact paints is negligible. One must keep in mind that because of the heterogeneity of typical waste streams, some subsamples or components of that_waste steam may e*"""1h*urdousÇaste thresholds if subsamples or components are small enough. To account for this heterogeneity, waste classification decisions are normally made by DTSC for the 'average' properties of an identified waste stream.

The EpA in 1998 passed a ¡ule which suspended temporarily the applicability of the Resource

Conservarion and Recovery Act (RCRA) Toxicity Characteristic (TC) Rule (40 CFR 267.24) to debris generated during leãd-based paint (LBP) abatement projects conducted at tatget housing;

deleading projects conà'ucted at public or commerciat buildings; and renovation or remodeling and demolition activities attargethousing, public buildings, or coÍrmercial buildings. Instead of being subject to the TC Rule, LÈP debris rèsulting from the above-mentioned activities would be subject to ihe management and disposal standards being proposed today under Title IV of the Toxic

Substances Control Act (TSòA). The EPA proposed this temporary suspension of the TC rule in accordance with RCRA sections 1006(bX1) and 2002 to avoid duplication and inconsistent regulation of LBP debris and to allow the Agency sufficient time to assess whether any RCRA re[uirements, in addition to TSCA Title IV requirements, are necessary to assure proper management and disposal of such debris.

In 1998, the Califomia Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) also reclassified lead construction debris waste from RCRA to TSCA. At that time DTSC retracted their earlier

ÃËåii"l'c"iiriou.e Citadet t-eu"i, êãuen Gate Natioñal Recreational Area, San Francisco, CA statement allowing for disposal of 'architectural waste' in Class 3 landhlls, but they failed to fully $25157.8 on JulY 1, Ord, have run pilot e on-site, DTSC has

Dilution of RCRA hazardous waste for this purpose is specifically disallowed under 40. cFR Part

26I. Ifithe case of recycling of 'architecturál \¡/ãrt"' from Fort Ord, CA, the DTSC st¿ted that the waste stream was not-teing- aitutea, since no materials were being added to the waste stream'

DTSC further went oo to "ã"o*uge recycling and reuse of waste materials as much as possible'

The Fort Ord operations did, however, occur on federal lands and to that extent they were not necessarily bound to state regulations.

while DTSC encourages the recycling of painted substrates, where feasible,maîy local concrele recycler are now hesiìant to accept *y pãiotta substates' in such cases must assess the economic impacts of r.ttstruæ strlpping for recyc sposal as of painted substrates within an approved landhll. Locafórdinance requ recycling may have bearing on the ultimaæ determination of the handling and disposal of intact painted subst¡ate'

For disposal purposes, the following charactetizalions standards apply:

Ãmirar'Cellirouse Citadel Level, èolden Gate Natioñal Recreational Area, San Francisco, CA aste

Segregate Components & Draw Representative Samples ra

Below TTLC (California Standard) Total Threshold Limit Concentration of 1000 mgikg

Per EPA Test SW846?

Greater than 50 mg/kg?

N (Cannot fail WET or TCLP tests)

TCLP

Toxicity Characteristic Leaching

Procedure. ComPare result to

Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration Federal Test for Leachable Metals

Less than 5mg/l?

Dispose of as Class I Hazardous Waste, Stabilization is Required (RCRA

Hazardous Waste)

Dispose of as Glass I Hazardous waste, Stabilization not required' (non-RCRA California Hazardous

Waste)

Test SWS+ Califoùia test for total lead concentration

WET Waste Extraction Test - CALIF test for leachable lead

TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure'

Federal test for leachability of lead

Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC) 1000 nis/ks Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC): 5 mg/l

Soluble Threshold Limit Concenffation (STLC): 5 mg/l

Disposal OptÍons:

Class I - Hazardous:

Non-RCRA (Califomiaflazardous) if total lead >1,000 mglkg or

WET >5mg/1 & TCLP <5 mgÂ

RCRA if TCLP > 5 mgll (requires stabilization)

Class II - non-Hazardous il V/ET between L5 &' 5 mgll

Class III - non-Hazardous, including Intact Painted A¡chitectural Components, or

Non-Desiggrated Waste VSTLC <L5 mg/r

3 Dehnitions & Notifications: The major defuritions of LBP or lead-coated surfaces are listed as follows:

a. HUD def,rnes LBP as paint that contains either >0.5% by weight of lead, or >l mglcrf,'

Summary Report for Asbestos and Lead Pa¡nt Survey

Ãtcairaz'Cellnouse C¡tadel Level, Golden Gate Natioñal Recreational Area' San Francisco' CA

4.

b. Consumer product Safety Commission (CPSC) prohibits the manufacturing of paurt that contains more than 600 ppm (0'06%) of lead'

Given the myriad of confusing defrnitions and regulations, this report uses the HUD's definition for the purpose- of identificationi, but compliance to CaVOSIIA's Construction Lead Standard is required for all paints with any measurable lead content'

California proposition 65: Leadis on the "Proposition 65" list, given its toxic potential in causing reproductive hazards.

Worker Certification: The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) requires the use of

Certifred Lead Workers and Supervisors for lead abatement projects at public buildings with a greater than2} years expect is completed specifi faints as defined bV HUO' requirements do not

Lo*"u"r, dust controls and still required under through 36100.

New Renovation, Repair and Painting Rules finalized by the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency on June iZ,Z¡Og,authorizedunder section a02@)(3) ofthe Toxic Substances Control Act

(T'SCA) require any Contractor or Maintenance Personnel disturbing more than 6 sq. ft' of interior ò, ZO sq. ft. of exterior lead-based paints (LBPs) in pre-1978 housing or chìld-occupied facilities to qompleie EpA-accreditetl training or 4-b¡. EPA-accredited refresher training, as applicable, for iead^safe work practices. Persons performing renovations, repairs andlor painting projects in target housing or chilà-occupied facilitiés must provide "Renovate fught" brochures to the Owners and o""opuï, after Decemb er 22, 2008. Window replacements are subject to the standards, These standards prohibit certain dangerous work practices, such as open flame burning or torching of lead-based paints. Required work practices include posting of wanrin-g signs, restricting occupants from work areas, contãining work areas to prevent dust and debris from spreading, conducting a thorough cleanup and veriffing that the cleanup is effective. Additional rules and information are available at www.epa.sov/1ead, "Certified Renovators" shall perform the following tasks:

o perfo.rq or direct uncertif,red workers perforrning regulated renovation activities;

o Provide training to uncertified workers on lead safe work practices;

o Be on-site during key stages of the renovation and otherwise be available on-site or by telephone at other times;

. Use an acceptable lead test kit to determine whethe¡ lead-based paints are present in an aflected area.

Firrns may apply for ce¡tification beginning in October 2009 and must be certified by April

2010.

San Francisco Exterior Lead-Based Paint Ordinance: The San Francisco Building Department requires tenant and neighborhood notifications and dust control procedures for impacts to interior or exterior HUD-defrnãd and presumed LBPs exceeding 100 sq. ft. This ordinance also prohibits power washing as an abatement method.

Ãlcatraz'Cellhouse citadel Level, Golden Gate Natioàal Recreational Area, San Francisco, CA

5.0 Results and Conclusions

5.1 Asbestos

A total of l2 bulk samples of suspect ACM were collected with 36 materials analyzed considering the multiple layers and serial analyses foi some maierials. The detailed results are shown in the Laboratory Report in Attachment 1'

Sample locations are shown on the drawings included ¿5 {¡¡¿çhment 5'

Sampling by SCA in November 2010 found the following ACM:

. None identifred at the Citadel Level.

sampling by cal Inc. in November 2002 similarþ found all tested substrates in the citadel to be non-asbestos (see

Attacbment 6).

"TÍaee" asbestos-containing materials (>0.1% and<lo/o asbestos by weight) sampled by SCA include:

o None identified at the Citadel Level'

5.2 Non-AsbestosMaterials(non-ACMI

Non-asbestos materials sampled by SCA irclude:

. Gray mortars at Citadel brick construction ISCA Sample LD. CIT-MORTAR-101-1 thru 3].

. Red brick at Citadel partiallypainted [SCA Sample I.D. CIT-BRICK-102-1 thru 3]'

. Wall plasters at interior cells on masonry walls at Citadel Level ISCA Sample I.D. CIT-WLPL-103-1 thru 3 and Cal Inc. SamPle I'D. 01 thru 031.

. Concrete beams with brick aggregate and white surface paints ISCA Sample I.D. CIT-CONC-104-1 thru 3 and Cal Inc. Sample I.D. 04 thru 061.

¡ Unpainted concrete and brick floors throughout Citadel areas [Sample I'D. CONC-NNNI.

t 3 Lead-Based Paints

Lead-based paints (LBP), as defured by U.S. Departnnent of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), were identifred at the site, including but not necessarily limited to the following:

o Blue and green paints at interior cell door frames on the Citadel Lovel [GR-03-1 &,BL-04-1& 2 with >5'0 mglcrn2).

. White paints on fireplace bricks at interior celis at the Citadel Level [SCA Sample I.D. WH-01-6 with 1'2 m/cm2l.

o White pdints on plaster wall across from the fireplace in interior cells at Citadel Level ISCA Sample I'D'

WH-O I -7 with >5.0 mgl cm2\

See Attachment 2 for a summary of tested painted substrate results. Also included within the Summary Table are lead bulk sampling results compiied by Cal Inc. and RGA Envi¡onrnental, Inc. t1'2002 and 2003, respectively'

Few site paints were found to be below the HUD LBP criteria, although s are required trrorghoot the demolition of painted elements to comply with the cavosHA R 1532'1' All site p-aints shall be treated as having a lead conteni greater than 600 ppm procedures in compliance with 8 CCR 1532.1.

Loose and peeling paints should be removed under controlled procedures prior to any demolition of the structure.

ñorr. of tn. uppi*i*ute regulations require removal of LBP prior to demolition or renovation if the paints are s..rrr"ly adherËá to the sub'strates (i.e.,ion-flaking or non-peeling). Disposal of the demolition debris in this case

ÃÈatraz'ce¡tfiouse Citadel Level, Golden Gate Natioñal Recreational Area, sân Francisco, CA canb€hand1edaSnon-hazardouSandnon-RCItAwaSteaftertleloose"" as demolition practices do not compromise worker safety'

Conventional demolition techniques should be employed for all painted surfaces with the Contractor complying with applicable OSHA and CaVOSHA statutes regardirg:

o Worker a'lvareness training;

o Exposure monitoring, as needed;

. Medical examinations, including blood lead level testing; and o Establishing a written respiratory protection program.

5.4 Lead Contaminated Soils & Bulk Analvses

In addition to the )CRF sampling, SCA collected bulk samples of the brick and concrete with brick aggregate substrates to verifi the potential lãad content of the masonry. Both samples found negligible lead concentrations at

1.6 and 8.3 ppm, resPectivelY.

Surface soils were found to have a total threshold lead concentration of 3,100 and 830 ppm, respectively' The eastern garden sample has an elevated lead concentration exceeding the CaVEPA Title 22 standards, classiffing it as a hazardous waste. Both samples were above the EPA and HUD standard of 400 ppm for children play ateas, indicating that some remediation of drip line soils will be necessary'

Ãeirai'CettÉouse Citadel Level, Golden Gate Natioñal Recreational Area, San Francisco, CA paae 12

6.0 Limitations and Exclusions

SCA warrants that this survey was perforned using due care and state of the art techniques. Beyond this, SCA does

,o-.y. Despite

- identified' or ideniified.

-Thi construction materials, and/or

This document is not a stand-alone document; abatement of materials is recommendçd to be completed under the oversight and design of an AHERA-accredited project Designer and certified Asbestos consultant' Although due care is exercised in the course of the survey, conðealed mãterials may be found in the course of perfonrring the abatement or demolition; a contingency buáget should be included in any cost estimates to cover unexpected conditions.

Note that SCA survey was not a comprehensive survey of the entire site and was limited to the areas designated by

WfS fo, planned ,"pãitr. Areas with similar materiaÍs and appearances not otherwise surveyed shall be treated in kind.

Ãlcatra= ôeltirouse citadel Level, Golden Gate Nat¡onal Recreational Area, san Francisco, cA

SCA Proiect No.: 8-9873

Attachment 1

Laboratory Results - Asbestos

Ãlcatraz'cellhouse Citadel Level, Golden Gate National Recreational Area, San Franc¡sco' cA

SCA Proiect No.: 8-9873

Attachment 2

Representative Lead-Based Paint XR-F Sampling Results

8-9873.AS XRF Results

REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLING OF LEAD-BASED PAINTS

ALCATRAZ CITADEL LEVEL SURVEY, SAN FRANCISCO' CÄ

SAMPLED BI' SCA ENVIRONMENTAL,INC. ON 1]^n6,20l0,cAl, INC. ON 1216/2002 & RGA ON 2/5i2003

SCA PROJECT NO.: B-9873'AS

Location Floor Condition

WH-O1 I 1|r6120t0 East Moat Citadel White Wall Brick 0.20 No Intact wH-O1 2 tv76l2010 East Moat citadel White Wal1 Brick 0.02 No Intact

BK-02 I tu76l20).0 East Moat Citadel Black Beam Steel 0.10 No Chipped & Rustv wH-O1 3 1111612010 Central Corridor Citadel White Inhll Plaster 0.40 No Intact

GR-03 1 tvr6l20t0 Cell Citadel Green Door Frame Wood >5.00 Yes lntact wH-O1 4 t!r612010 Central Corridor Citadel White Beam Concrete <0.01 No Spalling

BL-04 1 rU16l20r0 Cell Citadel Blue Door Frame Wood >5.00 Yes Intact

PK-05 I rUt6l20 0 Central Corridor Citadel Pink V/all Plaster 0.24 No lntact wH-O1 5 rrlt6l20 0 Cell Citadel White Pipe Cast Iron 0.50 No Intact wH-01 6 rvt6/20 0 Cell Citadel White Firenlace Brick t.20 Yes Peeline wH-01 7 tU16l20 0 Cell Citadel White Wall Plaster >5.00 Yes lntact v/H-O1 8 tUr6l20 0 North Moat Citadel White V/all Brick <0.01 No Intact wH-O1 9 tUr6l20 0 North Moat citadel V/hite Beam Concrete <0.01 No Spalling

RD-O6 1 rvt6l20 o West Moat Citadel Red Floor Brick <0.01 No Intact wH-O1 l0 tUt6l20 0 West Moat Citadel White Wall Brick 0.04 No Intact

SI-07 I r1lt6120 0 'West Moat Citadel Silver Door Metal 0.04 No Peeling

RD-06 2 ry16l20 0 WestMoat Citadel Red Wall Brick 0.02 No Intact wH-01 11 111t6120 0 Cell Citadel White Ceiline Brick 0.02 No Intact wH-O1 l2 rIr6120 0 West Moat Citadel White Beam Concrete <0.01 No Spalling

BK-02 2 tUr6120 0 South Moat Citadel Black Pipe Cast Iron 0.02 No Intact

RD-06 J tU16l20 0 South Moat Citadel Red Wall Brick 0.01 No Intact

GY-08 I tur6l20 0 East Moat Citadel Grav Door Metal 0.02 No Peelins

BK-02 .) 7t/r612010 South Moat Citadel Black Beam Steel 0.0r No Chipped & Rustv

Page 1 of4

8-9873.4S XRF Results

REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLING OF LEAD-BASED PAINTS

ALCATRAZ CITADEL LEVEL SURVEY, SAN FRANCISCO, CA

SAMPLED BY SCA ENVIRONMENTAL,INC. ON IIIIúI2OIO,CAL INC. ON 12i6l2002 & RGA ON 2i5l2003

SCA PROJECT NO.: B-9873.4S

Floor ov/-O9 I rvr6l2010 Cell Citadel Off-V/hite Arch Plaster 0.02 No Peeling

V/H- OlPC

121612002 Sheer Wall A Citadel White Wall Brick 480 No Not Listed wH-

O2PC

t21612002 Shear Wall B Citadel White Wall Plaster 160 No Not Listed wH-

O3PC

12t6t2002 Main Corridor

Citadel White 3rd Column Concrete 9800 Yes Not Listed wH-

O4PC

t2t6t2002 Shear'Wall F East Side citadel White Wall Plaster 690 No Not Listed

V/H-

O5PC

121612002 V/est End Citadel White Column 6 Concrete <100 No Not Listed

150052 21512003 West End citadel White North Face

Column I Concrete 93 No Not Listed

1s0069 2tst2003 'West End Citadel White West Face Column 4

Concrete 369 No Not Listed

I 50053 21512003 Central Cell Citadel White South Face Column l0

Concrete 255 No Not Listed

I 50057 21512003 Central Corridor Citadel White West Face

Column 12

Concrete <93 No Not Listed

I 5 0070 2ts/2003 Central Cell Citadel White East Face Column 13

Concrete 985 No Not Listed r50068 2tst2003 Central Corridor Citadel White East Face Column 7

Concrete <98 No Not Listed

150051 2t512003 Shear Wall A East End

Citadel Tan Watl @ Footing

Brick 652875 Yes Not Listed r50067 21s12003 East End Cell Shear Wall B

Citadel White North Face Wall Ø Footins

Brick r80 No Not Listed

150061 2/s12003 Central Cell Shear

V/all C

Citadel White North Face Wall Ø Footins

Brick 103 No Not Listed

8-9873.AS XRF Results

REPRESENTATTVE SAMPLING OF LEAD-BASED PAINTS

ALCATRAZ CITADEL LEVEL SURVEY, SAN F'RANCISCO' CA

SAMPLED BI. SCA ENVTRONMENTAL, rNC. ON lln6t20t0,c.Al. rNC. ON 1216/2002 8¿ RGA ON 2/5/2003

SCA PROJECT NO.: B-9873.4S

Date Condition

15006s 2tst2003 Central Cell Shear Wall D

Citadel White West Face Wall @ Footine

Brick 214181 Yes Not Listed

150054 2/5/2003 Central Cell Shear Wall E

Citadel Blue South Face

Column at Shear Wall tr'ootins

Concrete 233505 Yes Not Listed

150064 2/512003 West End Cell Shear Wall F

Citadel V/hite West Face @ V/all

Brick 118 No Not Listed

A 21s12003 Shear Wall B @ Column 20

Citadel Column Debris Concrete 49 No Debris

B 2ts12003 Soil at Shear'Wall

@ Column 20

Citadel Soil Debris Soil 10 No Debris

C 21s12003 Shear Wall B @ Column 20

Footins

Citadel Oxidized Rebar Metal 48 No Debris

D 2tst2003 Shear Wall B fDl Cohrmn 20

Citadel Chimney Brick 21234 Yes Debris

E 2t5t2003 West End Column L

Citadel Dust & Debris

1020 Yes Debris

F 21512003 Collector Beam Gridline B

Citadel Concrete Debris <8 No Not Listed

* HUD definition for Lead-Based Paints is >1.0 mglctr; or>O.SYo lead by weight.

Note: paints and glazing with a detectable lead content are subject to the Contractor's conrpliance with cavosHA regulation 8 ccR 1532.1during demolition, scraping

REPR.ESENTATIVE SAMPLING OF LDAD-BASED PAINTS

ALCATRAZCITADELLEVELstIRvEY,SANTRA¡tcISco'cA SAMPLED BY SCA ENVIRONMENTAL,INC. ON 11/16/2010'Ci{L INC' ON 121612002 & RGA ON 2/5/2003

SCA PROJECT NO.: B-9873'AS

@Labatementpriorto torching or cùttiig, ete'

Figures in bold represent lead-based paints (tBP) per HLID definition'

B-9873.4S XRF Results

Aìcafaz cellhouse citadel r_"u"i, ôãl¿"n Gate National Recreational Area, san Francisco, cA

Attachment 3

Soil Sampling Results

1534 WillowPass Road' Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701

Web: ww mccampbell com E-mail: main@mccampbell'comMcCampbell Analvtical. Inc.

SCA Enviromental, lnc.

334 19th Street

Oakland, CA 94612

Client Project ID: #8-9873.4S; Alcatraz Citadel Date Sampled: 11116110

DateReceived: 11116110

Client Contact: Glenn Cass DateReported: 1Il17ll0

Client P.O.: DateCompleted: lll17l10

'WorkOrder: 1011474

November 17,2010

Dear Glenn:

Enclosed within are:

1) The results of the 4 analyzedsamples from your project: #B-9873'AS; Alcatraz citadel'

2) A QC rePort for the above samPles,

3) A copY ofthe chain ofcustodY, and

4) An invoice for anal¡ical services'

All analyses were completed satisfactorily and all QC samples v/ere found to be within our control limits'

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsorconcerns,pleasefeelfreetogivemeacall' Thankyouforchoosing

McCampbell Analytícal Laboratories for your analytical needs'

Best regards, J,0"_ AngelaRydelius Laboratory Manager

McCampbell AnalYtical, Inc.

fq rff ' i)ä' :& ;¿ tæ Kë rT

¿Èsif*åtL@SË

&S.3 ülÈ s**æ6arttæ*itø rëß*1 êrj, ìxÞce¡s

,lå¡.¡¿*i,Sit¡, cfieêa *¿s.F

Ü¡øk**-t"r åÞ. .jLs***;¡¿îs5 {l;¡ê* - F.$e4d f.wft rsflÉSë{al

*s¡ll*ifs í1*r

; "":i''a

LËI.f

4',*il*i

,å"*e*xç¡*ry X¡a¡¡ *iâ*r *+ðbt

,*ô? ü-4Fiãiå {îËi:,é tiG F4?l{ fffir5l*'?

l. Àr'g${ gi reg,s*re4

Fì{*.gtE:r"{ {.!.*s*,å} 8*^âi {Àr#e$r'iã}

*s* *.'xitg r¡¡{se, -$-.Täã.å ì ç 'x0.tï i?**" Sf ê-è" xg sç*ES.

i¡:43. re*Sçs ${:å i:efura*g.+J¡ zj*g rixsì+€,¿rq 4:!s*k:

{:&É.

¿:. æ*f sa¡*Påæ"

*:¡Sitslc$-

McCampbell Analytical, Inc.

1534 Willow Pass Rd

Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701

(92s) 2s2-9262

Report to:

Glenn Cass SCA Enviromental, lnc.

334 19th Street Oakland, CA 94612

(510) 645-6200 FAX (510) 83s-620

G HAIII.O Í.GUSTO IIY R TG O RII Page I of I

IWaterTrax !WriteOn

Email: gcass@sca-enviro.com cc:

PO:

ProjectNo: #B-9873.AS: Alcatraz Citadel

WorkOrder: l0ll474

!EDF flExcel nFat IEmail

Bill to:

Accounts Payable SCA Enviromental, lnc.

334 19th Street Oakland, CA94612

ClientCode: SCAO

! HardCopy ! ThirdParty

Requested TAT:

Døle Received:

Date PrÍnted:

flJ-flas

1 day

LL/1612010

rt/16/2010

Requested Tests (See leqend be

1011474-001 clT-BRlcK- 102-1 Sod 11t16t2010 A 1011474-002 ctT-coNc - 104-1 Sod 11t16t2010 A 10't 1474-003 Soil-SW-2 (O Librarv So 1M6t2010 n A 1011474-OO4 Soil-W6-Eäst Soil 11t16t2010 A

Lab lD

Test Leqend:mm

24hrRUSH

Glient lD Collection Date Hold m m mm mm m t0

Prepared by: Shino Hamilton

NOTE: So¡l samples are discarded 60 days after results are reported unless other arrangements are made (Water samples are 30 days).

Hazardous samples will be returned to client or d¡sposed of at client expense.

Comments:

1534 WillowP¿ss Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701 'Web:w.mccampbell.com E-mail: main@mccampbell.comMcCampbell Analvtical. Inc.

Client Name: SCA Enviromental' lnc.

Project Name: #B-9873.4S; Alcatraz Citadel

Workorder N": 101'1474 Matrix s¿!lþ!j!

Chain of custodY Present?

Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?

Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?

Sample lDs noted bY Client on COC?

Date and Time of collection noted by Client on COC?

Sampler's name noted on COC?

Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?

Shipping container/cooler in good condition?

Samples in proper containers/bottles?

Sample containers intact?

Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?

All samples received within holding time?

Container/Temp Blank temperature

Water - VOA vials have zero headspace / no bubbles?

Sample labels checked for correct preservation?

Metal - pH acceptable upon receipt (pH<2)?

Samples Received on lce?

Sample Receipt Checklist

Chain of Custodv ICOCI lnformation

Date and Time Received: 1'11161201O 6:58:18 PM

Checklist completed and reviewed by: Shino Hamilton

Carrier: Derik Cartan (MAl Courier)

Samole ReceiPt lnformation

Yes ø

Yes ø

Yes Ú Yes ø

Yes E

Yes n

Yes n Yes M

Yes ø

Yes ø

Yes ø

Yes ¡

Yes ø Yes !

Yes ø

No!

No!

Nlo ¡

No!

Non

Noø

No¡ N¡o !

N¡o !

No!

No¡ l.lAø

Sample Preservation and Hold Time (HT) lnformation

Yes ø No!

Cooler Temp: 6.6"C l.lA!

No n No voA vials submitted Ø

No!

No!

N¡o n l.lAø

(lce TYPe: WET ICE

. NOTE: If the "No" box is checked, see comments below.

Date contacted: Contacted by:

Client contacted:

Comments:

McCampbell Analvtical. Inc.

"When Oualiv Counts"

1534 Vr'illow Pass Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701

Web: w.mccampbell.com E-mail: main@nccampbell'com

Telenhone: 817-252-9262 Fax:925-252-9269 ;

SCA Enviromental, Inc.

334 19th Street

Oakland, CA94612

Client Project ID: #B-9873.4S; lJcatraz

Citadel

Date Sampled: 11116110

DateReceived: 11116ll0

Client Contact: Glenn Cass DateExtracted: 71116170

ClientP.O.: DateAnalyzed: l1/l1ll0

Extractionmethod: SW3050B

Læad by ICP-MS*

Analyticalmethods: SW6020 Work Ordec 1011474

Lab ID Client ID Mat¡ix KtractioD TYP( Lead DF %SS Comments

101 1474-0014 CIT-BRICK. I02-1 S TOTAL t6 123 t01t474-002¡^ CIT-CONC - 104-1 S TOTAL 83 t21 t0t1474-003/. Soil-SW-2 @Library S TOTAL 830 100 73 r0r1474-004¡. Soi1,W6-East S TOTAL 3 100 100 75

Reporting Limit fo¡ DF = 1 ;

ND means not detected at or w TOTAL NA velL

S TOTAL 05 mgKs all TCLP I STLC /DISTLC / SPLP extracts are reported in mg/L'

Iter'

# means suÍogate diluted out of range; ND means not detected above the reporting limilmethod detection limit; N/A means not applicable to this sample or instrument'

TOTAL = Hot acid digestion of a representative sample aiiquot'

TRM = Total recoverabÌe metals is the "direct analysis" ofa sample aliquot taken from its acid-preserved container'

DISS = Dissolved metals by direct analysis of 0.45 pm hltered and acidified sample.

%SS = Percent Recovery of Surrogate Standard

DF = Dilution Factor

DHS ELAP Cetifrcatíon | 644 4 *r.la Rydelius, Lab Manager

1534 Willow Pass Road, Piltsburg, CA 945ó5'1701

Web: w mccampbell.com E-mail: main@mccampbell'corn

:8'l'l-252-9262 Fax:925' McCampbell Analvtical. Inc.

QC SUMMARY REPORT FOR SW602o

EPA Method SW6020 Extraction SW3050B BatchlD: 5¿1474 Spiked Sample lD: 1011453-0024

Analyte Sample Spiked MS MSD MS.MSD Spiked LCS LCSD LCS.LCSD Acceptance Criteria (%) mg/Kg mg/Kg % Rec. % Rec. % RPD mg/Kg % Rec. % Rec. % RPD MS / MSD RPD LCS/LCSD RPD

Lead l8 50 113 99.7 o<? l0 ltl r08 2.46 75 t25 20 75 t25 20

ToSS: t02 250 109 101 8.30 250 118 r16 202 70- 130 ¿ll 70 - 130 20 I

All target compounds in the Method Blank of this ext¡actioû batch were ND less than the method RL with the following exceptions:

NONE

W.O. SamPle Matrix: Soil/Solid QC Matrix: Soil

BATCH 54474 SUMMARY

Date Analyzed Lab lD

WorkOrder 1011474

Date Sampled Date Extracted Date Analyzed

¿p

Date Sampled Date Extracted rOt1474-002A 11/16110 ll/16/10 1llr7l10 12:45 PM

4'14-004A 11'116110 11116110 1111'7/10 12:56t01 1474-0014 lllI6ll0 11116110 11/t'7/10 12:40 PM

1474-OO3A ltlr6/10 trll6/10 llll'7 110 12:50 PM plicate; RPD = Relative Percent Deviâi¡on'

% Recovery = 100. (Ms-sample)/ (AmountSpiked); RPD = 100'(MS' MSD) / (MS + MsD) /2)'

MS / MSD spike recoveries and / or %RpD may fall outside of laboratory acceptance criteria due to one or more of the following reasons: a) the sample is inhomogenous AND contains significant concentrat¡ons of analyte relative to the amount spiked, or b) the spiked semple's mâtrix interferes with the spike recovery'

N/A = not applicâble to this method.

NR=analyteconcentrationi ^.

DHS ELAP Certification 1644 QA/QC Officer

Rlcairaz'Cellhouse Citadel Level, Golden Gate Natioñal Recreational Area, San Francisco, CA

SCA Proiect No.: 8-9873

Attachment 4:

Field Data Sheets

SCA Environmental, lnc.

Asb Material/Sampling

Data Sheet

BLDG NAME:

BLDG NO:

DEPT CODE:

1. Aircell Type 2. Block

BoardTlpe 4.PaperV'lraP Loose Fill 6 Trowelled On

Mud Type L Sprayed On

Wool Felt 10 Beneath ACN¡

11. Mult Layers l2.ChunldPowder

Material Comments le lD (include BLÐG

Functional SpaceAllowed: blank, numbeieach comment and reference aboveCornments:

Updated 9-1 1-06 MSDS & FSDS_Asb & Pb_vert

Alcafaz'Cellhouse C¡tadel Level, Golden Gate Nat¡onâl Recreational Area, San Francisco' CA

SCA Proiect No.: 8-9873

Attachment 5

Sampling Location Drawings

? ??? 3?,??

llll- | - | I l-

PERIMFIER OF CITADEL

WATER CISTERNS. ACCESS

c o

¡f.. É|,?eEXTREM ELY LlMlrED.

lo4r.2()

94v*'tø"tt')

AIRS TO

MAIN

AREA

o-

USEABLE

Ct'l4oØftt?'

MAIN CELLBLOCK FOUNDATION

CITADEL LEVEL (MAIN CELLBLOCK AREA ABOVE)

TO

[A-L

\ND

IVER

)0M

TO

FIRST LEVEL OF

HOSPITAL WING.

ITECT IN PLACE.

) NOT USE FOR

ot4

HISTORIC STAIRS TO

FIRST LEVEL OF MAIN

CELLBLOCK AREA.

PROTEÇT IN PL,ACE."

Do NOÏ USE_DURING

CONSTRUCTION.

/'-i\ CITADEL LEVEL REFERENCE PI-AN I | \ -'

\{9/ Ö LEGEND:v

Ëi--'-- = ASBESTOS-CONTAININGMATERIAL(AcM) i-l' = NoN AsBESTos IIATERIAL (NoN'AcM) iinl = TRAcE (<1%) AsBEsros

??? ? ? ? ? ? ? 9??

llirrrrrr¡

I I M | *.'$u*urdr7¡! | l!

6t (^ .ìrrrrþ1 iit tîlfñtî)YYYiiirtt

,l

@@@llt?

".'.1 o

3? 9??

16 0 16 32

SCALE OF FEÍ

SIAIRS NOÍ

^ USUBLEGr---

NOTES

ALL CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON

THIS SHEÍ IS EXISTING

M CÍADEL LEVEL MASONRY

/'Î\ CITADEL LEVEL REFERENCE PLAN

LEGEND:

(+) = HUD.DEFINED LEAD-BASED PAINT (LBP)

(-) = LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT (LCP)

APPROXIMATE LOCATION

OF CISERN MNHOLE.y7.-7C) o$-01-t()HISTORIC STA1RS IO

FIRST LEVEL OF MÀN

CELT.BLOCK AREÀ

PROTrcT IN PUCE..

oo rdr use"ounrnö

CONSNUCTION

ako7.l n¡cnr¡ron v¡no -.--\

HoSPITAL WING (BASEMENT LEVEL)

Alcafaz'CellÉouse Citadel Level, Golden Gate National Recreational Area, San Francisco, CA

SCA Proiect No.: 8-9873

Attachment 6

Previous Asbestos Bulk Sampling Results

'|r / 65/'¿ø62 I 4: 54 t{ou O5 02 OS: l7a

/ô /44649ø6 Fl3ÞêsçÞÕh ì

ASBESTECFI

dt25 F¡ir Onts Blvd", Sulrc 103

Carmlchae[ CalifornÍa 9560t Tel.(916) 481-8902 Fax (9)6) 48t-t97s

CAL II.€

316^¡tEr-3975

PAGE ø6 p.2

Cllaf,:

Cll Enviru¡nrntd Srr.'krc' flc' PO Box 6127

V¿øvillc, CA 95496-6n7 t¡B JOE 't

4125?

D¡c/Ti¡rr C¿rllcorurll I t/l/02 hs RrcalvÊd: ll/1ru2 hth:

?69t /tlc¡trÂ? CltrdÊl

Sas Fnuclsco, Cs, Bqrx AslEsl'os ANALYSI8 RDPpqr

NVLÂP fl IO1A47 oot{s fi ll53 D+te Ârulyrr<t lll4Æ2

0t

Sanpla No ëolurïkgtìnrìon %I\ne /lsh¿cøî Othc¡ Mdctid't

0l (ir4ìolr. Mln!."

Gr¡oular Mi¡t¡, 6r¡¡¡l¡r Min¡, Gr¡nular Mits, OÉnuWMûr, Gn¡ulrrMi¡¡.

Oc¡nul¡¡ Mi¡u.

Grr¡rul¡¡ Mí¡u, Gr¡¡uh¡ l-lina.

].ffrcll¡ry¡ilÞt pr lFqvlvrÆ fì4lüÉ.r rÞtq)N$¡$J1Y Fr)i lrlE llltÐlltl'Ð D^ll tt ls.E. r^

Wllkc plaræc wrll conidor wrn

Cr¡aY Phrt¡¡ çny pbrEr *tll sìffilùr ceúlÈ1

Crly plactø 1¡'¡ll ç¡r'¡'idsr Íùr¡h

Whírc plmtcr

While concrg¡s ¡b¿¡¡'Y¡atl e

Groy comrute

(:roy eo,ncrctc corrldor c¿lunrn wcl

Chay concrcæ øri¡.lo¡ column o'onrf

NONE DETE(TED

NOND DETECTED

NONE DETECTED

NÔNEÞITEÇTED

}iOi'IE DETECTED

NÖNE ÞEruCÎÊD

NOIüE DETÊCTED

NONS DETÊCTED

NôNÉ OËirûCîßD l,(È^t^Lt!ts vJtÉnÐrræ u{rrr HF¡dÈofy rÈD tr'fPlu¡otltl'^lHlttotolrolh¡ÍlÌ P^ [*nþD ó ffil¡P ^x¡!YEr#dNÄltr¡ti.-

Summary Report for Asbestos and Lêad Paint Survey Alcafaz óellhouse Citadel Level, Golden Gate National Recreational Area, Sen Francisco, CA

SCA Proiect No.: 8-9873

Attachment 7

Previous Lead Bulk Sampling Results

L2/II/2øø2 11:34 7ø744649ø6 í cAt. il.c

Dæembcr 71,2002.

Bonita J, Mucller, RA.

Historical Arclitoct sfið, NE Menager N¿tioaal Pa¡t Sc¡'vice . Dsnverr S crvicc Center

72795W, AImú^Parkway ?.O. Box 25287 Drnver, CO 80228

Dea¡ Bonnio Muoller, I havo rocoived the lab…