Attachment_J2(N)_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(PPQ).docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Construction, Maintenance, Environmental & Testing Services (COMETS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- NNC17ZFD015R
About this file
Attachment J.2(N) - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Construction, Maintenance, Environmental & Testing Services (COMETS) has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Construction, Maintenance, Environmental, & Testing Services (COMETS)
Attachment J.2(N) – Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
ONCE COMPLETED, THIS DOCUMENT WILL BE CONSIDERED
SOURCE SENSITIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 3.104
1. The survey should be completed by the individual most knowledgeable of the contractor's day-to-day operations and overall condition of services being rendered. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the contractor's performance with the judgment of others in the organization, as applicable.
2. Handwritten responses are sufficient, but request they be legible.
3. The following descriptions should be used as guidance in providing ratings:
Performance Ratings/Questions: Based on your knowledge of the contract identified below, please provide your assessment of how well the Contractor performed on the questions listed in the table below. It is very important to keep in mind that only performance in the past 3 years is relevant. You are strongly encouraged to give a short narrative indicating why you chose the adjective you did, especially for those answers that are “Good,” “Fair,” “or “Poor.” The following definitions are offered for your use in assigning a performance rating:
| CODE |
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
| E |
| Excellent |
| Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance. |
| VG |
| Very Good |
| Very effective performance, fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies. |
| G |
| Good |
| Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance. |
| F |
| Fair |
| Meets or only slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance. |
| P |
| Poor |
| Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas, deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance. |
| NA |
| NA |
| Not applicable |
4. Please provide explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Space for narrative comments is included with the questions. If more space is needed, use the back of the survey or attach additional pages.
5. This survey relates to an on-going source selection for the services identified above. All information provided within the survey will be safeguarded against unauthorized disclosure.
6. We appreciate your time and effort in providing this vitally important information.
OFFEROR IDENTIFICATION
Offeror address (Name, Division, Address)
DUNS
Contract Number
Contract Title
Contract Type
Contract Description
Period of Performance (basic and any options)
| During contract performance, offeror was the |
| [ ] Prime: |
[ ] Significant Subcontractor [ ] Team Member [ ] Other (Please Describe):
Percentage of the total contract value performed by offeror
Total Contract Value
Location of Services
| Does a corporate or ownership relationship exist between the offeror being evaluated and your firm? |
| [ ] No |
[ ] Yes (please describe):
Unusual contract features or conditions
RESPONDENT INFORMATION
Name of Evaluator
Telephone number and email address of evaluator
Position Title
Agency/Company (Name, Division, Address)
Your role in the program/contract
Length of involvement in this program/contract
If this questionnaire is being completed for a subcontractor on the identified solicitation, who is the prime contractor:
| _____________________________________________ | ______________________ | |
| Respondent Signature | Date |
Performance Rating (X)
| Description |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| NA |
| Comments |
1. Rate the Contractor’s organizational support structure. Did it provide an adequate span of control and supervision?
2. Rate the Contractor’s ability to react quickly and effectively to changing requirements, budget fluctuations, and changes in priority or contract problems.
3. Rate the Contractor’s record in recruiting and retaining a qualified workforce to fulfill contractual requirements; identifying and effectively filling key positions and providing back-ups.
4. Rate the Contractor’s ability to keep the customer fully informed of work status, problems, and/or issues as well as their cooperation to resolve such problems/issues:
5. Rate the Contractor’s record in complying with safety, health and environmental policies and procedures:
6. Rate the Contractor’s record in completing tasks/milestones/deliverables within established time schedules:
7. Rate the Contractor’s record in the coordination and management of its subcontractors if applicable:
8. Did the contractor provide effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements?
9. Rate the Contractor’s record for submitting administrative requirements (reports, correspondence, etc.) on time and complete:
10. Rate the Contractor’s ability to implement a phase-in program that provided continuous workflow:
11. Did the contractor react in a timely manner to respond to internal organizational issues?
12. As a unit, how would you rate the complete contract performance?
13. Any cost overruns or underruns? If so, please state the amount and explain reasons for them:
14. Would you do business with the contractor again? Would you have any reservations about recommending a future contract award to this company? Please elaborate.
15. Please provide any other information you feel is pertinent but was not covered by this questionnaire:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .