J.1(b)_Attachment_10_-_PPQ_-_Attachment_01_to_Amendment_01.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- NNA17568278R
About this file
Revised Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CLIENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER
DATE (TBD)
Dear Client:
We are currently responding to a request for proposal (RFP) for the NASA Ames Research Center Technical Services for Aerospace Modeling and Simulation (SimLabs) III procurement. The major objectives of the contract include successful preparation and operation of simulations, collection of research data, and the continuing maintenance and upgrade of simulator facilities, as well as development, test, and validation of advanced air traffic management automation tools.
NASA Ames Research Center is continuing to place increased emphasis on past performance as a source selection factor. As such, a requirement of its solicitation is that past clients of ours be identified and asked to participate in the evaluation process by providing information about our relevant past performance.
We have identified ____________________ of your organization as the point of contact based on his/her knowledge concerning our work.
Please help us by completing the enclosed Past Performance Questionnaire and forwarding it directly to Bethany McClave, Contracting Officer, by email to: bethany.a.mcclave@nasa.gov.
A response to this questionnaire is requested to the above address no later than _______.
Thank you for completing this questionnaire. Any questions may be directed to the undersigned. Sincerely, Enclosure
Amendment 01 NNA17568278R J.1 (b) Attachment 10
This form contains Source Selection Information when completed.
Please use the following adjectival ratings to respond to the questions on the following pages. Please select one rating per statement, using the following definitions and provide additional remarks to further explain any Excellent or Poor rating, as well as in response to the more detailed questions.
Definition of Ratings
| Excellent (E) |
| Consistent record of exceptional past performance by the offeror and any proposed major subcontractors on work identical or very similar to the work requirements of the proposed contract; indicates exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) problems with no adverse effect on overall performance. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| Consistent record of successful past performance by the offeror and any proposed major subcontractors on work identical or very similar to the work requirements of the proposed contract; demonstrating very effective performance that would be fully responsive to contract requirements with contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part with only minor problems with little identifiable effect on overall performance. |
| Good (G) |
| Successful past performance by the offeror and any proposed major subcontractors on work similar to the work requirements of the proposed contract; and it demonstrates effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable problems, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance. |
| Neutral (N) |
| Neutral score. Assigned to offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or not applicable. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Successful past performance by the offeror and any proposed major subcontractors on work similar to the work requirements of the proposed contract and may be limited in terms of the size, scope and complexity when compared to this contract; demonstrates meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance. |
| Poor (P) |
| The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates performance that does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; problems in one or more areas, which adversely affect overall performance. |
Past Performance Questionnaire Contract Information Offeror:
Contract Name:
Contract Number:
Agency/Company/ Organization Name:
Point of Contact Name:
Point of Contact Phone/Email:
General Contract Information Please provide the following information about this contract and the Offeror's role:
1. Provide a brief description of services provided by the Offeror under this contract.
| Y |
| N |
2. Given what you know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with this contract’s requirements, would you recommend them for similar requirements in the future?
3. Type of Contract
| Firm Fixed Price | |
| ☐ | Cost Plus Fixed Fee |
| ☐ | |
| Cost Plus Award Fee | |
| ☐ | Other (Describe): _____________________ |
| ☐ |
4. Method of Competition
| Non-Competitive |
| ☐ |
| Competitive (provide description—e.g., Full and Open, Small Business Set-Aside, etc.—below) |
| ☐ |
| Follow-on? |
| ☐ |
| New requirement? |
| ☐ |
5. Period of Performance (including extensions/options):
| From: |
| To: |
6. Total Contract Value (including all options): $________________________________
7. Briefly describe any change(s) from original contract value (including cost overruns):
8. Was there a cost overrun? ( ) Yes ( ) No If yes, please explain (please address any overruns in direct and indirect costs (such as increases in overhead rates) and their impact on overall cost performance):
9. What are the total contract expenditures to date (cost/fees to date based on invoices, reports, etc.)?
10. If this is/was an award fee contract, please provide award fee percentages earned for the last year. Please provide the rating scale used to determine such percentages.
11. Level of Support for Services Provided Enter the number of employees that the Offeror provided under this contract for each of the specific services listed. Also indicate the total number of employees provided by the Offeror across the entire contract.
| Systems Engineering |
| Software Development and Systems Administration |
| Aerospace Engineering and Applications Programming |
| Graphics Programming |
| Simulator Hardware & Mechanical Systems Engineering and Operations |
| Safety and Mission Assurance |
| Configuration Management |
| Outreach |
| Subject Matter Expert Recruitment |
| Contract Management |
| Total Employees on Contract* |
*Total number of employees may include more than just those identified in the specific services.
Please rate the Offeror’s performance under this contract for the specific services, functions, or issues listed below. Please ensure that the rating is consistent with the Definition of Ratings provided.
| TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE |
| PERFORMANCE RATING |
(Please circle)
| Overall technical performance over the life of the contract |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| N |
| S |
| P |
Please provide an explanation for any Excellent or Poor ratings above. Also include any other comments about the Offeror’s technical performance on this contract, including any relevant metrics used; positive or negative trends; any problems in delivered hardware or software, including any mishaps or failures; and any specific steps taken to enhance technical performance or overcome technical issues and the impact.
Please provide any relevant examples of the contractor demonstrating flexibility and effectiveness in dealing with unexpected changes to technical and/or schedule requirements and discuss the impact.
Please provide any relevant examples of the contractor demonstrating innovative and resource-efficient approaches and discuss the impact.
Please rate the Offeror’s performance under this contract for the specific services, functions, or issues listed below. Please ensure that the rating is consistent with the Definition of Ratings provided.
| CONTRACT MANAGEMENT |
| PERFORMANCE RATING |
(Please circle)
| Overall contract management over the life of the contract |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| N |
| S |
| P |
| Coordinating prime and subcontractors working across multiple, concurrent, complex tasks |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| N |
| S |
| P |
| Recruiting, developing, and retaining a technically qualified, motivated workforce |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| N |
| S |
| P |
| Filling vacant positions in a timely manner |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| N |
| S |
| P |
| Quickly and efficiently procuring necessary resources (e.g., materials, hardware, and software) |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| N |
| S |
| P |
| Management during the phase-in period to ensure efficient continuation of operations during contract turn-over |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| N |
| S |
| P |
| Retention of key and technical personnel during the phase-in period |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| N |
| S |
| P |
| Record regarding occupational health, security, and safety issues |
| E |
| VG |
| G |
| N |
| S |
| P |
Please provide an explanation for any Excellent or Poor ratings above. Also include any other comments relevant to the Offeror’s contract management performance on this contract, including any relevant metrics used, positive or negative trends, and any specific steps taken to enhance contract management performance or overcome contract management issues and the impact.
Provide any relevant examples of the contractor establishing employee performance standards, cross-training, recognizing outstanding performance, handling of any labor-related issues such as the arbitration of grievances by employees, or dealing with underperforming employees, and discuss the impact.
Please provide any relevant examples of the contractor demonstrating proactive measures to identify and resolve issues or enhance performance and discuss the impact.
Please provide any relevant examples of interfacing by corporate management with local contract management or Government counterparts to resolve a problem and discuss the impact.
| ____________________________________ |
| _________________ |
| Submitted By (Name and Title) |
| Date |
| ____________________________________ |
| _________________ |
| Agency/Company |
| Phone Number |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .