Section L Attachment L-1 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N68335-26-R-1027
About this file
This file is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed to evaluate contractor performance on previous contracts relevant to the CH-53: FY26 O-Level Peculiar Support Equipment Group A solicitation (N68335-26-R-1027). The questionnaire is intended to be completed by government customers or contract officers who have directly worked with bidding contractors on prior engagements.
The form captures essential performance data across five key areas: contractor and customer identification, contract number and period of performance, contract type (negotiated, sealed bid, fixed price, cost reimbursement, IDIQ, or other), and complexity of work (difficult or routine). Evaluators rate contractor performance in three critical dimensions—Quality of Product and Processes, Timeliness of Performance, and Customer Satisfaction—using a five-point scale ranging from Unsatisfactory to Outstanding. Each rating category includes detailed criteria: quality encompasses compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, personnel appropriateness, and technical excellence; timeliness addresses interim milestone achievement, reliability, responsiveness to technical direction, and on-time completion; and customer satisfaction measures end-user satisfaction with the contractor's service and product. The form includes comment sections for each rating category and concludes with a question regarding whether the government would select the firm again, requiring explanation. The template requires signatures and contact information from both the interviewee and interviewer, along with completion dates.
View the file
Other files
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION L ATTACHMENT (L-1)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
1.Contractor:
2.Customer:
3.Contract Number: Period of Performance:
| 4.Contract Type: | Negotiated | |_| | Sealed Bid | |_| | |||
| Fixed Price | |_| | Cost Reimbursement | |_| | ||||
| IDIQ | |_| | Other | |_| |
5.Complexity of Work: Difficult: |_| Routine: |_|
Ratings: Summarize contractor performance and circle the appropriate rating for each category.
Quality of Product and Processes: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory
Highly Satisfactory Outstanding
(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence)
Comments:
Timeliness of Performance: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory
Highly Satisfactory Outstanding
(Met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical direction, and completed on time)
Customer Satisfaction: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory
Highly Satisfactory Outstanding
(Satisfaction of end users with contractor’s service and product)
Would you select this firm again? Please explain.
| Interviewee Name: | Signature: |
| Phone Number: Fax Number: | |
| Date: |
| Interviewer Name: | Signature: |
| Phone Number: | Fax Number: |
| Date: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .