N65236-18-R-0022 COFS PRESOLICITATION DRAFT EVAL CRITERIA.pdf
PDF 58 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N65236-18-R-0022
About this file
This document provides draft evaluation criteria and pricing models for solicitation N65236-18-R-0022 to provide Corporate Operations Functional Support services to the Naval Information Warfare Systems Command. The effort involves providing day-to-day operational support services across force management, personnel and physical security, cybersecurity, communications, business intelligence, facilities, and safety/administrative management. The contract will have a one-year base period and four one-year options and utilize firm fixed price, cost-plus-fixed-fee, and firm fixed price level of effort contract line items. Evaluation factors will include technical capability, management and staffing plan, personnel qualifications, past performance, and cost/price. Questions regarding the solicitation are due by July 12, 2019.
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N65236-18-R-0022 Corporate Operations Functional Support (COFS)
DRAFT EVALUATION CRITERIA
1 | P a g e
FACTOR A: TECHNICAL CAPABILITY
Element A1: Command Information Technology (IT) Support (PWS Paragraph 3.3) Element A2: Corporate Operations Analytics Support (PWS Paragraph 3.8) Element A3: Video/Teleconference (VTC) Operations Support (PWS Paragraph 3.4)
All elements are equally important. In order to receive an acceptable rating for Factor A, the Offeror must have acceptable demonstrated experience in all three elements.
FACTOR B: MANAGEMENT AND STAFFFING PLAN
Subfactor B1: Task Order Management Capability (PWS Paragraph 3.1.1) Subfactor B2: Task Order Management Approach (PWS Paragraph 3.1.1.2) Subfactor B3: Staffing Plan
The subfactors’ order of relative importance is established as follows:
1. Subfactor B1 is more important than Subfactor B2.
2. Subfactors B1 and B2, when combined, are more important than B3.
FACTOR C: PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION (1 résumé – Project Manager)
FACTOR D: PAST PERFORMANCE
FACTOR E: COST/PRICE
Contract Type CLIN(s) Pricing Info PWS References
Pre-priced
0001-0006;
0008-0020 Priced per month
PWS Para(s): 3.1.1, 3.2.1, 3.2.2 - 3.2.7, 3.2.9 - 3.2.10, 3.3.1 - 3.3.3, 3.3.5, 3.3.9 - 3.3.10, 3.5.4, 3.5.6, - 3.5.8, 3.5.10 - 3.5.12, 3.5.14 - 3.5.17, 3.6.1, 3.6.3, 3.7.1
0007 Priced per event (3 weeks in duration) PWS Para: 3.3.4
0021 Priced per year PWS Para: 3.5.9 0022 Priced per event PWS Para: 3.5.13
Pre-priced CLINs will be used for the requirements within the cited PWS paragraphs (found in Sec B). The pricing shall be at the frequency identified in Sec B. All pre-priced CLIN amounts shall be inclusive of fully burdened labor rates (to include profit).
CPFF
0023 Ceiling: $3M PWS Para(s): 3.9.1 - 3.9.3 Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) CLIN will be used for additional requirements within cited PWS Paragraphs that are not pre-priced (found in Sec B). The labor categories have been identified on the "CLIN 0023 Rates" tab of this Pricing Model. The estimated ceiling amount for this CPFF CLIN pricing is $3M (inclusive of the Base Year + 4 Option Years).
FFP
0024 Ceiling: $53M PWS Para(s): 3.2.8, 3.2.11 - 3.2.17, 3.3.6 - 3.3.8, 3.4,
3.5.1 - 3.5.3, 3.5.5, 3.6.2, 3.6.4 - 3.6.8, 3.7.2 - 3.7.5, 3.8.1, 3.8.2 (Reference Exhibit A)
Firm Fixed Price (FFP) CLIN will be used for additional requirements within the cited PWS paragraphs that are not pre-priced (found in Sec. B). FFP CLIN pricing shall utilize the fully burdened rates as identified in Exhibit A with an estimated ceiling amount of $53M.
FFP LOE
0025 17,400 Hours PWS Para(s): 3.2.1 - 3.2.7, 3.2.9, 3.2.10, 3.3.1 -
3.3.5, 3.3.9, 3.3.10, 3.5.4, 3.5.6 Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Level of Effort (LOE) will be used for surge support requirements within the cited PWS paragraphs (found in Sec B). FFP LOE pricing shall include only one (1)
N65236-18-R-0022 Corporate Operations Functional Support (COFS)
DRAFT EVALUATION CRITERIA
2 | P a g e fully-burdened rate (inclusive of the actual labor rate, burdens, and profit) to support the stated LOE provided by the Government (provided in Sec B).
Relative Order of Importance:
(1) Factor B (Management and Staffing Plan) is significantly more important than Factor A (Technical Capability) which is more important than Factor E (Cost/Price).
(2) In addition, Factor C (Personnel Qualification) and Factor D (Past Performance) will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis and will not be considered in the comparative assessment or tradeoff analysis, but must be rated be rated Acceptable for a proposal to be eligible for award.
NOTE: A proposal that receives a rating of “Unacceptable” in any non-cost factor or subfactor will result in the entire proposal being determined “Unacceptable” and ineligible for award.
Relative Order of Importance:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .