N65236-18-R-0022 COFS PRESOLICITATION DRAFT EVAL CRITERIA.pdf

PDF 58 KB Posted

Attached to
SPAWARSYSCEN Atlantic Command Operational Functional Support
Solicitation number
N65236-18-R-0022
Issued by

About this file

This document provides draft evaluation criteria and pricing models for solicitation N65236-18-R-0022 to provide Corporate Operations Functional Support services to the Naval Information Warfare Systems Command. The effort involves providing day-to-day operational support services across force management, personnel and physical security, cybersecurity, communications, business intelligence, facilities, and safety/administrative management. The contract will have a one-year base period and four one-year options and utilize firm fixed price, cost-plus-fixed-fee, and firm fixed price level of effort contract line items. Evaluation factors will include technical capability, management and staffing plan, personnel qualifications, past performance, and cost/price. Questions regarding the solicitation are due by July 12, 2019.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N65236-18-R-0022 COFS PRE-SOLICITATION DRAFT PWS_Rev1.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 1 - DRAFT CORPORATE OPERATIONS HISTORICAL SUPPORT_Rev1.pdf PDF
N65236-18-R-0022 COFS PRE-SOLICITATION DRAFT PERSONNEL QUALS.pdf PDF
N65236-18-R-0022 COFS PRE-SOLICITATION CONFERENCE Q&A.pdf PDF
N65236-18-R-0022 COFS PRE-SOLICITATION DRAFT KEY PERSONNEL.pdf PDF
N65236-18-R-0022 COFS PRE-SOLICITATION DRAFT STAFFING PLAN.pdf PDF
N6523618R0022 COFS - Pre-Solicitation Conference Attendee List.pdf PDF
N6523618R0022 COFS - Pre-Solicitation Conference Presentation.pdf PDF
N65236-18-R-0022 - DRAFT PRIME Pricing Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N65236-18-R-0022 COFS PRESOLICITATION DRAFT PWS.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 1 - DRAFT CORPORATE OPERATIONS HISTORICAL SUPPORT.pdf PDF
INDUSTRY_DAY_NOTES.pdf PDF
Questions received during Industry Day on 22 May 2018 .pdf PDF
Attendees List for Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attachment B METHODOLOGY 2.docx DOCX document
Attachment C Technical Exhibit V1.pdf PDF
Industry Day Pre-Solicitation Conference_18R0022_15May 2018.pdf PDF
Attachment A METHODLOOGY 1 Cost Price Sheet Example.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment A METHODLOOGY 1 Cost Price Sheet Example.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment B METHODOLOGY 2.docx DOCX document
Attendees List for Solicitation.pdf PDF
COFS PRESOLICITATION PWS DRAFT 20180507.pdf PDF
Questions received during Industry Day on 22 May 2018 .pdf PDF
INDUSTRY_DAY_NOTES.pdf PDF
Industry Day Pre-Solicitation Conference_18R0022_15May 2018.pdf PDF
COFS PRESOLICITATION PWS DRAFT 20180507.pdf PDF
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

N65236-18-R-0022 Corporate Operations Functional Support (COFS)

DRAFT EVALUATION CRITERIA

1 | P a g e

FACTOR A: TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

Element A1: Command Information Technology (IT) Support (PWS Paragraph 3.3) Element A2: Corporate Operations Analytics Support (PWS Paragraph 3.8) Element A3: Video/Teleconference (VTC) Operations Support (PWS Paragraph 3.4)

All elements are equally important. In order to receive an acceptable rating for Factor A, the Offeror must have acceptable demonstrated experience in all three elements.

FACTOR B: MANAGEMENT AND STAFFFING PLAN

Subfactor B1: Task Order Management Capability (PWS Paragraph 3.1.1) Subfactor B2: Task Order Management Approach (PWS Paragraph 3.1.1.2) Subfactor B3: Staffing Plan

The subfactors’ order of relative importance is established as follows:

1. Subfactor B1 is more important than Subfactor B2.

2. Subfactors B1 and B2, when combined, are more important than B3.

FACTOR C: PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION (1 résumé – Project Manager)

FACTOR D: PAST PERFORMANCE

FACTOR E: COST/PRICE

Contract Type CLIN(s) Pricing Info PWS References

Pre-priced

0001-0006;

0008-0020 Priced per month

PWS Para(s): 3.1.1, 3.2.1, 3.2.2 - 3.2.7, 3.2.9 - 3.2.10, 3.3.1 - 3.3.3, 3.3.5, 3.3.9 - 3.3.10, 3.5.4, 3.5.6, - 3.5.8, 3.5.10 - 3.5.12, 3.5.14 - 3.5.17, 3.6.1, 3.6.3, 3.7.1

0007 Priced per event (3 weeks in duration) PWS Para: 3.3.4

0021 Priced per year PWS Para: 3.5.9 0022 Priced per event PWS Para: 3.5.13

Pre-priced CLINs will be used for the requirements within the cited PWS paragraphs (found in Sec B). The pricing shall be at the frequency identified in Sec B. All pre-priced CLIN amounts shall be inclusive of fully burdened labor rates (to include profit).

CPFF

0023 Ceiling: $3M PWS Para(s): 3.9.1 - 3.9.3 Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) CLIN will be used for additional requirements within cited PWS Paragraphs that are not pre-priced (found in Sec B). The labor categories have been identified on the "CLIN 0023 Rates" tab of this Pricing Model. The estimated ceiling amount for this CPFF CLIN pricing is $3M (inclusive of the Base Year + 4 Option Years).

FFP

0024 Ceiling: $53M PWS Para(s): 3.2.8, 3.2.11 - 3.2.17, 3.3.6 - 3.3.8, 3.4,

3.5.1 - 3.5.3, 3.5.5, 3.6.2, 3.6.4 - 3.6.8, 3.7.2 - 3.7.5, 3.8.1, 3.8.2 (Reference Exhibit A)

Firm Fixed Price (FFP) CLIN will be used for additional requirements within the cited PWS paragraphs that are not pre-priced (found in Sec. B). FFP CLIN pricing shall utilize the fully burdened rates as identified in Exhibit A with an estimated ceiling amount of $53M.

FFP LOE

0025 17,400 Hours PWS Para(s): 3.2.1 - 3.2.7, 3.2.9, 3.2.10, 3.3.1 -

3.3.5, 3.3.9, 3.3.10, 3.5.4, 3.5.6 Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Level of Effort (LOE) will be used for surge support requirements within the cited PWS paragraphs (found in Sec B). FFP LOE pricing shall include only one (1)

N65236-18-R-0022 Corporate Operations Functional Support (COFS)

DRAFT EVALUATION CRITERIA

2 | P a g e fully-burdened rate (inclusive of the actual labor rate, burdens, and profit) to support the stated LOE provided by the Government (provided in Sec B).

Relative Order of Importance:

(1) Factor B (Management and Staffing Plan) is significantly more important than Factor A (Technical Capability) which is more important than Factor E (Cost/Price).

(2) In addition, Factor C (Personnel Qualification) and Factor D (Past Performance) will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis and will not be considered in the comparative assessment or tradeoff analysis, but must be rated be rated Acceptable for a proposal to be eligible for award.

NOTE: A proposal that receives a rating of “Unacceptable” in any non-cost factor or subfactor will result in the entire proposal being determined “Unacceptable” and ineligible for award.

Relative Order of Importance:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .