21R1337 Note 4.pdf
PDF 200 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FY22 MCAF P-1366/AJJY073105P2, APR – MUNITIONS STORAGE IGLOOS PHASE 2, ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, GUAM
- Solicitation number
- N6274221R1337
About this file
This document contains questions and answers related to solicitation number N6274221R1337 for the construction of eight new earth covered munitions storage igloos at Andersen Air Force Base in Guam. The solicitation utilizes a design-build approach for site improvements, roadways, aprons, utilities and incidental work, while structural, lightning protection and mechanical work for the igloos will be design-bid-build. The questions and answers provide clarification on drawing references, material specifications, pavement connections, and confirmation that the 20 allowable work delay days are included in the 1,128 calendar day project duration. The related federal contract opportunity details the solicitation number, project name, opportunity type, and description of work, which includes construction of the eight new igloos totaling 16,000 square feet of storage area, along with four priced options to construct additional igloos. The awarding agency is identified as the Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 21R1337_AMD5.pdf | ||
| 21R1337 Note 8.pdf | ||
| 21R1337 Note 7.pdf | ||
| 21R1337_AMD4.pdf | ||
| 21R1337 Note 5.pdf | ||
| 21R1337 Note 6.pdf | ||
| 21R1337_AMD3.pdf | ||
| 21R1337 Note 3.pdf | ||
| 21R1337_AMD2.pdf | ||
| P1366 SV SignIn.pdf | ||
| 21R1337 Note 2.pdf | ||
| 21R1337_AMD1.pdf | ||
| 21R1337 Note 1.pdf | ||
| 1a_P-1366 - Final RFP - DB RFP.pdf | ||
| 1b_P-1366 - Final RFP - Drawings.pdf | ||
| 21R1337-RFP.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Notice No. 4
10 August 2021
PRE-PROPOSAL QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
RFP N62742-21-R-1337
FY22 MCAF P-1366/AJJY073105P2, APR-MUNITIONS STORAGE IGLOOS, PHASE 2,
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, GUAM
NOTE: The following questions and answers are provided for INFORMATION ONLY. The RFP remains unchanged unless it is amended in writing on a Standard Form 30.
9. Ref. Document 00700 (RFP).
Given the current extreme volatility in construction materials pricing (steel, lumber, electrical, plastic products, etc.), manufacturers and suppliers are unwilling to commit to pricing beyond 30 to 60 days. This places an enormous pricing risk on prime contractors and subcontractors including many small business firms that would like to compete for this project. With this material pricing uncertainty facing the U.S. construction industry, it’s very difficult and costly to submit firm fixed prices. There is a fair and equitable solution available under FAR 52.216-4 Economic Price Adjustment-Labor and Material. This clause protects both the Government and the contractor from price fluctuations. In reviewing the list of FAR clauses included in the RFP solicitation documents, FAR 52.216-4 was not included. Please consider adding FAR 52-216-4 to the solicitation to provide a fair and equitable clause that will help all parties including the Government, contractor and subcontractors avoid uncontrollable price increases due to the volatile materials market.
ANSWER: The Government has considered your request. However, the RFP remains unchanged.
10. Ref. Drawing Sheet 7 of 45 B-002.
On the drawing B-002 Note number 1 mentioned the drawing number S-111 but RFP drawing does not have this page. Please provide this missing drawing S-111.
ANSWER: Sheet B-002, Note 1 shall reference Drawing B-101 for munition storage igloo locations. Clarification will be provided in a forthcoming amendment.
11. Ref. Drawing Sheet 22 of 45 S-001. Specification Division 03 Concrete, Part 6-Section 03 31 30 Marine Concrete and Section 03 45 33 Precast Structural Concrete.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND, PACIFIC
258 MAKALAPA DRIVE, SUITE 100
JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR HICKAM, HAWAII 96860-3134
On the drawing S-001, there is nothing mentioned of the marine concrete requirement. However, RFP specification under Division 03 “Concrete” included the marine concrete requirement under Section 03 31 30 Marine Concrete.
a) Please confirm if the Munitions Storage Magazines (MSMs) cast-in placed foundation, slab on grade and retaining wall are considered as marine concrete.
ANSWER: Confirmed.
b) Please confirm if the Precast Wall panel and Precast Roof panel are considered as marine concrete.
ANSWER: Confirmed. Clarification will be provided in a forthcoming amendment.
12. Ref. Drawing Sheet 27 of 45 S-301, Section C1 and Sheet 31 of 45 S-502, Details A2, A3, B1, B2, C1 and C2.
On the drawing S-301, Longitudinal Building Section C1 indicated that the embedded channel around the precast wall size is “C9x”. However, drawing S-502 details A2, A3, B1, B2, C1 and C2 shows that the embedded channel size is “C10x20”. Please confirm the correct size of the embedded channel around the precast wall.
ANSWER: Embedded channel in precast wall panel shall be C10x20 as detailed on S-502.
Clarification will be provided in a forthcoming amendment.
13. Ref. Drawing Sheet 28 of 45 S-302, Side Wall Section A3. Specification Section G20 Site Improvement, G20 1.3.2 Base Course Performance Verification.
On the drawing S-302 side wall section A3 does not indicate the thickness of the base course material under the slab on grade, instead, it has a note “See Specification”. RFP specification Section G20 Site Improvement under paragraph G20 1.3.2 Base Course Performance Verification G20 1.3.2.1 “Aggregate Base Course” the thickness at item c mentioned “confirm in-place compacted thickness. Please verify the required thickness of base course under the ECM Slab on grade.
ANSWER: Base course thickness underneath magazine floor is indicated on Drawing B-501, Sections A1 and A3.
14. Ref. Drawing Sheet 8 of 24 C-151. Specification “3.0 Site Analysis”, Page 410 of 1397,
3.1.2 Man-made Constraints. Specification “3.5.2 Design Review Checklist”, Page 1232 of 1397,
b. Design Drawing, item number 4.
This drawing number C-151 is a Site Demolition Plan, but there is no detail of items to be demolished. Even under specification Section 3.0 Site Analysis paragraph 3.1.2 Man-Made Constraints stated that “There is no observed existing underground storm drainage system in the vicinity of the project site”. Please verify it the demolition works on this drawing C-151 referring to Demolition plans for the removal of trees as mentioned on Specification 3.5.2 Design Review Checklist item b. Design drawing item number 4.
ANSWER: The callout on C-151 indicates the hatch to be the approximate limit of area disturbed by grading.
15. Ref. Drawing Sheet 12 of 24 C-501, PCC Apron/AC Paved Turnout/AC Pave Roadway Section (Front of MSI) Detail D4. Sheet 4 of 45 GA004, Notes No. 6.
On the drawing number C-501 “PCC Apron/AC Paved Turnout/AC Pave Roadway Section (Front of MSI) Detail D4” shown the connection of proposed AC pavement Turnout (P1366- Phase 2) and the 6th street AC pavement roadway (P3105-Phase 3) that will be completed before the P1366-Phase 2 commencement as mentioned on drawing number GA004 Note No. 6. The detail connection does not show the overlaying of new AC pavement to the existing pavement (6th street AC pavement roadway). Please confirm if the contractor needs to construct the overlaying of AC pavement.
ANSWER: Contractor must tie into 6th Street Roadway being constructed by others. AC paving along 6th street is not required except as necessary to connect to the roadway, or as required to repair damage and restore the roadway to its pre-construction condition in accordance with GB004 Note 6.
16. Ref. Specification Section 01 14 00, Page 2, Paragraph j.
Please confirm if the 20 workdays per Calendar Year, that the Contractor must allow for work delays, are already included in the project duration of 1,128 Calendar Days.
ANSWER: Confirmed.
End of Notice
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .