Attach 01 PPI Response Sheet.pdf

Govt Tracking

PPI Tech/CS Govt Response:

Addressed in Amendment

Number

RFP Section: Part 1 Page Number: 6 Paragraph: PROPOSAL DUE DATE, SUBMISSION, AND FORMAT

The RFP states "Proposals shall be submitted by email to: nancy.m.coffee.civ@us.navy.mil AND jason.a.lewis34.civ@us.navy.mil" and the following sentence instructs offerors to submit through the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) portal. Please confirm offerors are to submit proposals via PIEE and not submit via email.

CS The solicitation is revised. See Amendment 0001 Amend 0002

RFP Section: Part 1 Page Number: 9 & 10 Paragraph: Factor 2 - Corporate Experience (1) Construction Experience and (2) Design Experience The RFP states to use Attachment C for Construction & Design Experience; however, Attachment C is PPQ is for Construction and Design Experience. Please confirm Attachment B is to be used for the Construction & Design experience for Factor 2 Experience.

CS The solicitation is revised. See Amendment 0002 Amend 0002

RFP Section: Part 1 Page Number: 11 & 12 Paragraph: Factor 3 - Past Performance

a) Please confirm Offerors are to use Attachments C1 and C2 for the construction and design Past Performance Questionnaires and not Attachment D Safety Data Sheet Safety Narrative. b) If the Offeror has a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ-0) on file previously completed by the Client that matches all fields of the required Attachment C, may this be submitted in lieu of requesting a new PPQ specific to this solicitation?

CS The solicitation is revised. See Amendment 0002 Amend 0002

Reference: Attachment E2

a) Please confirm that Attachment E2 Financial Questionnaire Form is part of the Phase II proposal requirements and is not required for the Phase I proposal response. b) Please confirm attachment E1 Surety Form is required in the Phase I proposal response

CS See Price Factor Phase II Price Submission Amend 0002

RFP Section: Attachments A, D, E, F

Attachments A, D, E, F have an incorrect solicitation number N44255-21-R-2001 listed, please confirm these are the correct attachments for this Northwest AOR MACC N44255-21-R-4000, or revise these attachments to show the correct information.

CS The solicitation is revised. See Amendment 0002 Amend 0002

RFP Section: Part 1 Page Number: 8 Paragraph: Factor 1 - Technical Approach and Attachment A

The RFP states that Factor 1 - Technical Approach is not to exceed (1) one single-sided page; however, attachment A Offeror Team Composition and Management states not to exceed two (2) pages. Please clarify the page limit for Factor 1 Technical Approach.

CS The solicitation is revised. See Amendment 0002 Amend 0002

RFP Section: Part 1 Page Number: 4 Paragraph: Pre-Proposal Inquires

Attachment F PPI Form states: "PCO Email: AMANDA.R.BONUS.CIV@US.NAVY.MIL"; however, the RFP indicates that Nancy Coffee and Jason Lewis are the POCs for Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI). Please clarify who the Government POCs are for PPIs.

CS The solicitation is revised. See Amendment 0001 Amend 0002

RFP Section: Part 1 Page Number: 6 Paragraph: PROPOSAL DUE DATE, SUBMISSION, AND FORMAT

The RFP states "Proposals shall be submitted by email to: nancy.m.coffee.civ@us.navy.mil AND jason.a.lewis34.civ@us.navy.mil" and "Provide a copy, dated prior to the proposal due date and time, along with an emailed copy of the submission to the Government POCs: nancy.m.coffee.civ@us.navy.mil & amanda.r.bonus.civ@us.navy.mil." Please confirm these are the correct POCs.

CS The solicitation is revised. See Amendments 0001 and 0002 Amend 0002

Reference: Attachment E2

Attachment E2 has Amanda Bonus listed as a POC; however, in the RFP Amanda Bonus is only listed as the Government POC if the PIEE portal is down on the date and time of the proposal due date. Please confirm Amanda Bonus is the correct POC for Attachment E2.

CS The solicitation is revised. See Amendment 0002 Amend 0002

Reference: General

Would it be acceptable for Offerors to submit their RFIs in a single Excel log file that includes all of the required fields in the PPI form provided in the RFP? This assists with ease of tracking for both the Government and Offerors.

CS

The Pre-Proposal Inquiry form provided as an attachment is the only accepted method of submitting questions regarding this solicitation, which shall be submitted in writing and individually as an attachment.

Amend 0002

Reference RFP Page 49 of 96: The last paragraph under ‘Task Order Procedures’ indicates that failure to submit on a reasonable number of proposals may impact future consideration for proposed Task Orders or exercise of the option.

Under the next section ‘Competition’ on the same page, Item a. states that Task Orders valued at or below $20,000,000 are set-aside for Small Business awardees, and that Task Orders valued above $20M offer all awardees a fair opportunity to be considered for Task Order Award.

Question: Does the Government expect Small Business awardees to submit on some and/or most Task Orders valued above $20,000,000? If not, please confirm that a Small Business’ lack of response to Task Orders valued above $20,000,000 will not impact future consideration for proposed Task Orders or exercise of the option. Please also clarify whether Small Business awardees are required to notify the Government if they cannot submit an offer for a Task Order valued above $20M.

CS The solicitation is revised. See Amendment 0002 Amend 0002

Section 00 10 00 – Solicitation

“7. This acquisition will be solicited as an unrestricted procurement with an internal small business set-aside and full and open competition. Price evaluation preference will be given to HUBZone firms, in accordance with FAR 52.219-4.”

Will the price evaluation preference be given to HUBZone firms within the small business set-aside competition, or will the preference apply for all task orders regardless of set-aside status?

CS

The Price Evaluation Preference (PEP) will only be applied to work procured on a unrestricted basis. The PEP will not be applied when work is set aside for small businesses.

Amend 0002

Section 00 10 00 – Solicitation

“7. This acquisition will be solicited as an unrestricted procurement with an internal small business set-aside and full and open competition. Price evaluation preference will be given to HUBZone firms, in accordance with FAR 52.219-4.”

Will the HUBZone preference apply in the case of a large business-HUBZone firm joint venture, or will it only apply within the framework of a Mentor-Protégé relationship?

CS See response from PPI 022 Amend 0002

Reference: Evaluation Factors, Factor 3 – Past Experience

This question pertains to both the Offeror and the Designer of Record:

Will the Government allow us to present previously received PPQs (if needed), rather than asking our clients to provide new PPQs for this submittal?

CS Yes Amend 0002

Reference: Block 13.B of the Solicitation’s SF1442 –

Can you confirm that an offer guarantee is NOT required for the Phase I proposal, since there is no Task Order to bond at this time?

CS The solicitation is revised. See Amendment 0002 Amend 0002

Attachments with Amendment 0002:

Attach 01 PPI Response Sheet Attach A PIEE Vendor Access Instructions Attach B Offeror Team Composition Management Attach C Construction Design Experience Data Sheet Attach D PPQ Construction Experience/PPQ Design Experience Attach E Small Business Subcontracting Record Attach F Small Business Participation Attach G Financial Questionnaire Form/Surety Form Attach H HOOH and FOOH Analysis Form Attach I Post Award Contractors Limitations Subcontracting SB Cert Attach J Task Order Editable Clauses and Provisions