25R2512 - P-1069 General Requirements.pdf

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND, MID-ATLANTIC

9324 VIRGINIA AVE, BLDG Z-140

NAVAL STATION NORFOLK, NORFOLK, VA 23511

POC: Leslie McGehee, 757-341-1624, leslie.m.mcgehee.civ@us.navy.mil

INDEFINITE-DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) MULTIPLE AWARD

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC) FOR LARGE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION

PROJECTS PRIMARILY IN THE HAMPTON ROADS AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (HR

AOR), VIRGINIA

SOLICITION NUMBER:

N4008525R2512

P-1069, MARITIME SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM FACILITY, NAVAL AIR STATION

OCEANA/DAM NECK, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA

DATE OF SOLICITATION:

10 JUNE 2025

HR LP MACC CONTRACT HOLDERS:

N4008521D0079

AMERESCO

4006 Victory Blvd, Suite J909

Portsmouth, VA 23701

POC: Nicole Bulgarino

Email: nbulgarino@ameresco.com;

Emily.chapin@ameresco.com

N4008521D0080

Harkins

10490 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 400

Columbia, MD21044

POC: Ben Nichols

Email: bnichols@harkinsbuilders.com;

ekrick@harkinsbuilders.com;

rtirocchi@harkinsbuilders.com

N4008521D0081

RQ Construction, LLC

1620 Faraday Ave

Carlsbad, CA 92008

POC: Travis Nichols, George Rogers

Email: TNichols@rqconstruction.com;

GRogers@rqconstruction.com

N4008521D0082

Sauer

9728 Florida Mining Blvd. W, Suite

Jacksonville, FL 32257

POC: Gary Weeks

Email: sauerjaxestimating@sauer-inc.com;

kalvers@sauer-inc.com

N4008521D0083

SB Ballard

2828 Shipps Corner Rd

Virginia Beach, VA 23453

POC: Candy Hennig

Email: chennig@sbballard.com

N4008521D0084

Walsh

929 West Adams St

Chicago, IL 60607

POC: Brian McGinty, Anthony DeCarlo

Email: adecarlo@walshgroup.com;

bmcginty@walshgroup.com

N4008521D0085

Whiting Turner

6305 Ivy Lane, Suite 800

Greenbelt, MD 20770

POC: Sam Abutaleb, Nathan Leonard

Email: sam.abutaleb@whiting-turner.com;

nathan.leonard@whiting-turner.com;

tara.schlichtig@whiting-turner.com;

michael.thomas@whiting-turner.com

N4008521D0086

WM Jordan

11010 Jefferson Avenue

Newport News, VA 23601

POC: Michael Daniels

Email: mdaniels@wmjordan.com;

estimating@wmjordan.com mailto:leslie.m.mcgehee.civ@us.navy.mil mailto:nbulgarino@ameresco.com mailto:Emily.chapin@ameresco.com mailto:bnichols@harkinsbuilders.com mailto:ekrick@harkinsbuilders.com mailto:rtirocchi@harkinsbuilders.com mailto:TNichols@rqconstruction.com mailto:GRogers@rqconstruction.com mailto:sauerjaxestimating@sauer-inc.com mailto:kalvers@sauer-inc.com mailto:chennig@sbballard.com mailto:adecarlo@walshgroup.com mailto:bmcginty@walshgroup.com mailto:sam.abutaleb@whiting-turner.com mailto:nathan.leonard@whiting-turner.com mailto:tara.schlichtig@whiting-turner.com mailto:michael.thomas@whiting-turner.com mailto:mdaniels@wmjordan.com mailto:estimating@wmjordan.com

P-1069, Maritime Surveillance System Facility Solicitation N4008525R5212

Naval Air Station Oceana, Dam Neck Annex, Virginia Beach, Virginia Work Order 1737142

General Requirements

All terms and conditions of N40085-21-D-0079/0080/0081/0082/0083/0084/0085/0086 Indefinite Delivery

Quantity Contract apply to this solicitation. Please review your MACC award document for guidance on contract clauses and requirements that may pertain to this order. All contract clauses in the Basic Contract by reference or full text remain in effect unless superseded by this task order. You are responsible to adhere to all applicable clauses, even if they are not stated in this RFP package or the Task Order award document.

For clarification on any clause or other contractual issues, please contact Leslie McGehee at leslie.m.mcgehee.civ@us.navy.mil.

Amendments will be posted to PIEE, SAM.gov, and sent directly to MACC Holders. It is ultimately the responsibility of MACC Holders to monitor SAM.gov for any updates.

NAVFAC Solicitation No.: N4008525R2512

NAVFAC Specification/Drawings: WON # 1737142

Title: P-1069, Maritime Surveillance System Facility

Location of the Work: Naval Air Station Oceana, Dam Neck Annex, Virginia Beach, Virginia

Description of the Work:

The procurement is a Design-Bid-Build construction project for P-1069, Maritime Surveillance System

Facility, Naval Air Station Oceana/Dam Neck, Virginia. The project constructs a Maritime Surveillance

System Facility using a structural steel frame, rib CMU exterior wall system, concrete piles, grade beam foundation, concrete slab, and modified bitumen roofing system over tapered roof insulation on a steel-framed supported slab designed for future second floor loading for the Maritime Surveillance Facility at

Dam Neck Annex. The facility shall include training, operations, administrative, IT logistics support and watch stander spaces. Supporting spaces include male and female lockers rooms with showers, lactation room, and a coffee mess/break room. The facility shall include a Mission Control System, and IPT/PM spaces to support major acquisition and Test and Evaluation programs.

Project also includes renovation of Building 470. The existing spaces shall be reconfigured to compliment the expanded spaces to meet CUS mission requirements. The expansion and reconfiguration of Building

470 shall consist of sufficient sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF), special access program facility (SAPF), open secret storage (OSS), NMCI server room, telecommunications rooms, uninterrupted power source (UPS)/redundant continuous power utility room, multi-function room, warehouse, restrooms, break room, administrative and operational spaces.

Estimated Price Range: In accordance with DFARS 236.204(ii), Disclosure of the Magnitude of

Construction Projects, the estimated price range for this project is between $25,000,000 and $100,000,000.

Time for Completion: In accordance with FAR 52.211-10 Commencement, Prosecution, and Completion of Work, the deadline for completion of this task order (including Bid Options) shall be 1180 calendar days from date of award (includes 15 calendar days for submission and approval of bonds and insurance).

Consistent with FAR 52.211-10, completion of the entire work ready for use must occur prior to the aforementioned date. The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

Wage Determination: Department of Labor (DoL) General Decision Number VA20250167 applies to this work (Attachment D). The wage determination version in effect at the time of award shall apply to the work performed under this contract.

Liquidated Damages: In accordance with FAR 52.211-12 Liquidated Damages, if the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the task order, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted. See associated liquidated damages per phase below:

Estimate Number of Days Liquidated Damages

1180 calendar days after contract award $6,684.09 per calendar day

Utilities: The Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining all utilities required for construction and testing.

The Contractor shall provide these utilities at his expense, paid for at the current utility rate delivered to the job site. The Contractor shall provide and maintain all temporary utility connections and distribution lines, and all meters required to measure the amount of each utility used.

Record Shop Drawings: In accordance with FAR 52.236-21 Specifications and Drawings for

Construction, record shop drawings are required. Reproducible copies of these record drawings are required to be provided to the Government as deliverables under the task order.

Bond Requirements: In accordance with FAR 52.228-1, Bid Guarantees, each offeror shall submit with its offer a guarantee bond (Standard Form 24) in a penal sum equal to at least 20 percent of the offer price or $3,000,000, whichever is less.

Performance and Payment Bonds are required from the contract task order awardee no later than ten (10) calendar days after date of award.

Proposal Acceptance Period: Proposal acceptance period shall be 120 calendar days from the deadline for receipt of offers.

Definitization Of Equitable Adjustments for Change Orders Under Construction Contracts: No data is available regarding the timely definitization of equitable adjustments for change orders under construction contracts. The REA definitization information referenced in Navy Marine Corps Acquisition

Regulation Supplement (NMCARS) 5236.211(b)(2), should not be utilized. There are no agency-specific policies and procedures that apply to the definitization of equitable adjustments for change orders under construction contracts. This Contract contains rated order quantities certified for national defense use, and you are required to follow all the provisions of the DPAS regulation (DPAS Regulation - 15 CFR Part

700.12) only as it pertains to the rated quantities.

Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs): Offerors who determine that the technical and or contractual requirements of this RFP require clarification(s) in order to permit submittal of a responsive proposal shall submit all questions in writing. All inquiries shall be submitted via email to Leslie McGehee at leslie.m.mcgehee.civ@us.navy.mil no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to proposal due date.

Additionally, all inquiries shall be submitted using the Pre-Proposal Inquiry (PPI) form (Attachment F). Do not submit the same inquiry more than once. Please verify that inquiries submitted by you on behalf of your subcontractors are not duplicates. A response will be published via an amendment by email to MACC holders.

Site Visit: All MACC holders are invited to attend the Site Visit for the project. Firms participating in the site visit will not be directly compensated for their participation.

SITE VISIT INFORMATION WILL BE DETERMINED AND ISSUED VIA AN AMENDMENT.

Proposal Due Date: Friday, 11 July 2025 at 02:00PM ET. LATE PROPOSALS WILL BE HANDLED

IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 15.208(b).

Proposal Submission Instructions: In response to this request for proposal, the complete proposal shall include the Price Proposal and the Non-Price Factors Proposal, submitted in accordance with the Basis of

Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor. The Offeror shall submit an electronic copy of the proposal in accordance with the instructions below by the proposal due date.

Electronic Copies: Only The Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) Solicitation Module is authorized for the submission of electronic proposals (.pdf format) in response to this solicitation.

Electronic proposal submissions should be no larger than 1.9 GB per file. Offerors shall ensure that the

Government has received the electronic proposal prior to the date and time specified. PIEE Solicitation

Vendor Access Instructions are provided via Attachment G. Emailed, mailed and hand-delivered submissions will not be accepted.

Offerors shall allow adequate time to upload files which may be slower for non-DoD users and to avoid other technical difficulties that may be encountered. Offerors are also responsible for submitting files in the format specified and consistent with requirements stated elsewhere in this solicitation. Files that cannot be opened, or are otherwise missing the required content are the responsibility of the Offeror.

The PIEE system will record the date and time of package receipt. Upon successful receipt of the proposal through PIEE, the Offeror should receive an email confirmation. Please keep this for your records. The date and time of package receipt recorded in PIEE shall govern the timeliness of any proposal submission. Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 15.208(b).

This task order will be awarded on a fair opportunity basis pursuant to FAR 16.505 ordering procedures.

The proposed task order will be awarded to the responsible offeror, offering the best value to the

Government. For this task order, to make a determination of best value, tradeoff selection procedures are selected.

Evaluation Factors for Award

The Proposed Task Order will be awarded to the responsible Offeror offering the best value to the

Government. To make a determination of Best Value, the Government shall evaluate price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 – Management Approach and Schedule

Factor 2 – Past Performance

The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factor (Factor 1 –

Management Approach) is of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (Factor 2- Past

Performance). The combined non-cost/price factors are approximately equal to price.

Note: Past Performance on earlier task orders under the MACC contract, including quality, timeliness, and cost control, will be considered as described more fully in Factor 2, below:

Non-Cost/Price Evaluation Factors

The Offeror shall submit one (1) original, marked “Original”, via The Procurement Integrated Enterprise

Environment (PIEE) of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below. All submissions shall include the following:

• Cover page with solicitation number, solicitation title, Offeror name, address, phone number, fax number, Employer Identification Number (EIN), Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) in SAM, CAGE code, Federal Tax ID number, Point of Contact (POC), POC phone number, and POC email address

Price information contained in the non-price/technical proposal will not be considered. Likewise, non-price/technical information contained in the price proposal will not be considered.

Factor 1 – Management Approach and Schedule:

i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Submit a narrative work plan as well as a summary level schedule to describe your approach to managing the project and ensuring adherence to the project schedule. Both the schedule and narrative must address the execution of the base work and all options, as defined in the RFP. The narrative shall not exceed ten

(10) 8-1/2” x 11” pages, 12-point font size. Up to four (4) drawings on 11” x 17” paper can be provided to supplement the narrative and will not count towards the page limit. Provide the summary level schedule, in

11” x 17” pages in the Adobe PDF file. There is no page limit on the summary level schedule.

The narrative work plan shall address major elements of work and demonstrate understanding of the scope, all phases and major milestones, technical complexities, and construction schedule required to achieve the work as identified in the solicitation. Identify activities that may affect the project timeline, including other/off site work activities. In addition, the plan shall address the following technical complexities:

a. Overall management and coordination of simultaneous construction activities and preservation of adjacent ongoing Navy mission activities;

b. Compliance/Understanding of Navy secured areas/highly secured area requirements, and a complete understanding of the Construction Security Plan (CSP);

c. Approach to avoid project schedule slippage due to material/equipment procurement, delivery delays, weather, re-work, differing site conditions, and inspections relating to the project;

d. Discussion of intended manufacturer of the structural steel frame and concrete piles, and the expected lead time for securing the required materials. Also, discussion of the intended installation method for the steel frame and concrete piles including intended equipment, personnel, and expected production rate of installation per week

The project schedule shall illustrate the Offeror’s ability to achieve or improve on the contract completion date set out in the RFP (1180 calendar days, including 15 days for bond approval). Identify the overall completion time for this project as well as interim completion times (including each phase of work as identified n the RFP) and key milestones for sequences as required to completed construction. The schedule shall demonstrate an understanding of the work, a logical sequence of events to accomplish the work, and contain enough information to identify all of the major milestones, as defined in the RFP.

The schedule shall be based on the construction start date of 01 September 2025. This date is for proposal purposes only and is not intended to indicate an anticipated/planned award date.

ii) Basis of Evaluation:

Offerors will be evaluated on the extent to which they demonstrate a clear understanding of the requirements of the RFP. A narrative work plan that identifies areas of risk in logistics and resource management, and provides a comprehensive contingency plan that addresses mitigation of any identified risks with potential solutions, may be considered more favorably. A schedule that proposes realistic contract duration shorter than the required duration indicated in the RFP may be considered more favorably. A schedule that proposes contract duration longer than indicated in the RFP will be rated UNACCEPTABLE.

NOTE: If a realistic duration shorter than specified in the RFP is proposed, the proposed duration will be incorporated into the resultant contract.

Factor 2 – Past Performance:

Offeror do not need to provide any information under this factor as the Government will base the evaluation on known past performance on task orders awarded under this Multiple Award Construction Contract

(MACC). However, Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on task orders under this MACC. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues under this MACC. Explanations shall not exceed four (4) pages in total.

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on projects under this Multiple Award

Construction Contract.. The Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance other than projects performed under this Multiple Award Construction Contract from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Contractor performance Assessment Rating

System (CPARS), inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity

Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

The Government will consider the currency and relevancy of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s ability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking past performance information on other task orders under this Multiple Award Construction

Contract will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive a Neutral

Confidence rating.

Price

Price shall be submitted on the Price Proposal Form included in the solicitation. The Offeror shall submit one (1) electronic original copy via The Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE), with the solicitation submittal requirements identified below.

Please include the following:

• Cover page with solicitation number, solicitation title, Offeror name, address, phone number, fax number, Employer Identification Number (EIN), Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) in SAM, CAGE code, Federal Tax ID number, Point of Contact (POC), POC phone number, and POC email address;

• All amendments acknowledged;

• Price Proposal Form;

• Copy of Representation and Certifications and proof of registration in System for Award

Management (SAM);

• Confirmation of filing of Veterans’ Employment and Training (VETS) VETs-4212 for the

2023/2024 filing cycle;

• Bid Guarantee in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee. Amount shall be at least

20 percent of the proposed price, but shall not exceed $3,000,000; and

Proposal packages from unsuccessful Offerors will not be returned to the Offeror but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.

Refer to individual factors for page limitations. Pages that exceed indicated page limitations shall not be evaluated.

Offerors shall submit electronic proposals (.pdf format) in response to this solicitation. Only the PIEE

Solicitation Module is authorized for the submission of electronic proposals in response to this solicitation.

Electronic proposal submissions should be no larger than 1.9 GB per file.

Offerors shall ensure that the Government has received the electronic proposal prior to the date and time specified. PIEE Solicitation Vendor Access Instructions are provided via attachment with the solicitation.

Emailed submissions will not be accepted.

Offerors shall allow adequate time to upload files which may be slower for non-DoD users and to avoid other technical difficulties that may be encountered. Offerors are also responsible for submitting files in the format specified and consistent with requirements stated elsewhere in this solicitation. Files that cannot be opened, or are otherwise missing the required content are the responsibility of the Offeror.

The PIEE system will record the date and time of package submittal. Upon successful submission of the proposal through PIEE, the Offeror should receive an email confirmation. Please keep this for your records.

The date and time of package submittal recorded in PIEE shall govern the timeliness of any proposal submission. LATE PROPOSAL WILL BE HANDLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 52.215-1.

The Offeror is required to submit a complete Price Proposal Form that includes completion of all contract line items numbers (CLINs). All required proposal documents shall be submitted in accordance with FAR

15.208.

The price proposal shall be submitted separately, but at the same time as the technical proposal. Importantly, any price information included in the non-price/technical proposal will not be considered. Likewise, non-price/technical information included in the price proposal will not be considered.

The Government will evaluate price based on the total lump sum price. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

a. Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

b. Comparison of proposed prices with the Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE).

c. Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

d. Comparison of market survey results

VI. EVALUATION

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with Offerors in the competitive range; and to award the task order to the Offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value – the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a task order without discussions with Offerors

(except clarification as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting

Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive ranges to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

The best value tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced Offeror or other than the highest technically rated Offeror.

The technical factor is of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all non-price factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price.

Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions.

Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(es) and the associated risk to the successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(es). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

Attachments:

ATTACHMENT A: P-1069 Drawings 01 of 01

ATTACHMENT B1: P-1069 Specifications, 01 of 03

ATTACHMENT B2: P-1069 Specifications, 02 of 03

ATTACHMENT B3: P-1069 Specifications, 03 of 03

ATTACHMENT C: Construction Security Plan (CSP)*

ATTACHMENT D: Wage Determination, VA20250167

ATTACHMENT E: Price Proposal Form

ATTACHMENT F: Pre-Proposal Inquiry Form

ATTACHMENT G: PIEE Vendor Access Instructions

ATTACHMENT J: CJA_ML-23-04_Oceana Controls_Redacted

*An amendment will be issued when Attachment C is available.