22R2598 Amendment 0006.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT TO SOLICITATION NO. N40085-22-R-2598 P-678 DRY DOCK 8 SALTWATER SYSTEM FOR CVN-78, NORFOLK NAVAL

SHIPYARD, PORTSMOUTH, VA

The purpose of this Amendment is to provide PPI responses and the corresponding attachments.

The current proposal due date is 25 May 2022 at 2:00 PM local time.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 39

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-May-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008522R2598

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Mar-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-May-2022

CODE

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

CONTRACTING CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008522R2598

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0006

The purpose of this Amendment is to provide the following:

1. PPI responses

2. Section 3 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD revision

a. The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed three (3) single-sided pages.

3. Section 4.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS revision

a. One (1) original, one (1) CD-ROM, and one (1) copy of the hard copy proposal shall be delivered by mail five (5) business days after the electronic copy due date.

4. Attachment H – Price Proposal Form_revision 1

5. Attachment I – PIEE Vendor Access Instructions

6. 2022-05-03 P678 Dry Dock 8 SW System Amendment 0006

7. 1364315_AMEND_dwg_PH1_ELECTRICAL

8. 1364315_AMEND_dwg_PH2_ELECTRICAL

9. DD Assoc DWG NQ515_PPI 100

10. PW DWG 20940_PPI 100

11. YD DWG 165165_PPI 94

REFERENCE QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

Page Section Paragraph

Page 19 of Price

Proposal Form & Sheet 1-

EP101

Sheet

Keynote X4

Price Proposal Form &

Electrical Drawings

CLIN 0004

& Sheet Keynote

X4

The narrative of CLIN 0004 states that the electrical infrastructure is excluded from this Line Item. Sheet Keynote X4 and Drawing 1-EP101 seem to include the electrical infrastructure within this Line Item Pricing. Can you please clarify?

1-EP101 does not include any callout for CLIN 0004. 1-EP101 indicates that all work associated with the MCC-DP is to be installed under base bid, including the circuit breaker, relay, etc associated with all DPs. However, 1-EP103 indicated that the electrical motor connection and infrastructure between the MCC-DP and DP-1 is included in CLIN 0004 as shown by the clouding and sheet keynote 'X2'.

1- "ES"Series Drawings

Sheet Keynote #1

1- "ES"Series Drawings

Sheet Keynote #1

1- "ES"Series Drawings

Sheet Keynote #1

Sheet Keynote #1 of the 1-"ES" series of drawings gives us directions to "Expand existing underground duct bank." Can you please confirm that this includes the dark line weight duct bank symbols depicted on the drawings? (I.E.

Drawing 1-ES129 Telecom Duct Bank Only?)

Refer to the ductbank symbol on 1- E-011. The cable callout in a circle represents existing cable and therefore existing pathway. Callouts without circle represent new cable.

The existing ductbanks are indicated on ES-series with notation "existing". Note 1 points at the new duct bank expansion on ES-series sheets. The heavy weight line in the duct bank symbol indicates the bottom of the duct bank for orientation.

1-ES506

through 1-

ES510 & 1-

CU201

through 1-

CU212

No Electrical or Telecom Manhole Details have been provided other than the Butterfly Diagrams depicted on 1-ES506 through 1- ES510. Can you please provide Manhole Details or a Manhole Schedule depicting Manhole size requirements? Please not: there are multiple measurements shown via the Butterfly Details that seem to indicate the manhole widths, lengths, and depths. However, the measurements shown on the Butterfly Diagrams seam to conflict with the depths of the duct banks themselves. For example, if we are to obtain the Manhole sizes from the Butterfly Diagrams, then Manhole EM-1-09 is shown as a 72"x72"x78" Manhole via Drawing 1-ES507. The Utility Profile on 1- CU202 shows the Electrical Duct Bank entering Manhole EM-1-09 at a depth of almost 15 ft. Leading us to believe that some of these manholes will need to be around 16

ft. deep? Again can you please provide some type of Manhole Detail or Schedule so we can size these manhole accordingly?

Provide Electrical and Telecom Manholes in accordance with a Typical Manhole Detail with minimum internal dimensions as indicated in the Manhole Schedule.

Refer to amended Sheets 1-ES502 and 2-ES509 for details. The manholes must be provided with precast concrete grade rings for total manhole depth per duct bank profiles on CU-series sheets. The Typical Manhole Detail and the Manhole Schedule will be provided in Amendment.

1-ES506

through 1-

ES510

Will the new manholes be cast in place or precast.

New manholes can be cast in place or precast construction in accordance with Section 33 71 02 -

UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL

DISTRIBUTION, paragraphs

2.13.1 and 2.13.2.2.

Under paragraph 2.13.2.2.e - Replace the last sentence "The minimum design vertical load must be for H20 highway loading per AASHTO HB-17." with the following: "The minimum design vertical load must be 100,000 lb minimum wheel load capacity."

Under paragraph 2.13.1 Cast-in- Place Concrete Structures - add the following: "The minimum design vertical load must be 100,000 lb minimum wheel load capacity."

1-E-011, 1- "ES" Series Drawings, 1-ES603

The Duct Bank Legend of Drawing 1-E-011 depicts a symbol of a circled number. It states that this symbol is indicative of an existing cable designation. On the "ES" series drawings, for example, Drawing 1-ES132 plan south, there is a 20-way existing duct bank with a circled number 32. Keynote #2 is under this duct bank and gives us direction to provide conductors in the existing duct bank. On Drawing 1-ES603 Feeder Number 32 is listed as an existing feeder. Are we installing a new feeder in this duct bank as directed by Keynote #2, or is this an existing to remain feeder?

Disregard Note 2 for existing feeder #32 within existing 20-way duct bank on Sheet 1-ES132.

1-ES134

Please reference 1-ES134 Plan South East. There is a duct bank with Sheet Keynote #1. Keynote #1 gives us direction to expand the existing underground duct bank.

This duct bank is identified as existing and the drawing does not depict a new rout or expansion. Can you please confirm that no expansion is necessary in this location?

Disregard Note 1 for existing duct bank extension on 1-ES134 Plan South East. That duct bank expansion takes place in Phase 2 as indicated on Sheet 2-ES134.

1-ES134,

The Duct Bank shown running from the Switchgear to the Pumpwell Bldg. depicts that Feeder #48 is being installed in this section of Duct Bank. From that point on, it is no longer shown being installed in the Duct Bank to the Generator Load Bank or Generator. Feeder #48 is identified via Drawing 1- ES603 as being installed from Pumpwell 8 Generator to Pupwell 8 Generator Load Bank. Feeder #48 is the Load Bank Feeder. Can you please confirm that this feeder is being installed from the Switchgear into the Pumpwell Bldg? It is our assumption that this feeder has been mislabeled and should actually be Feeder #47, which is identified as being installed from Pumpwell 8 Panel PW8-4 to Pumpwell 8 Generator Load Bank for the Load Bank Heater and Load Bank Control Panel via Drawing -

1ES603.

Concur with the assumption.

Feeders 47 and 48 are mixed up withing the generator graphic footprint. Feeder 48 connects Generator Load Bank to generator power in accordance with Cable Schedule on 1-ES603. Feeder 47 connects Generator Load Bank Heater and Control Panel to panel PW8-4 inside the Pumpwell. It is routed from the Load bank to the Switchgear platform and to the Pumpwell. Feeder 48 in the duct bank between the Switchgear and the Pumpwell is actually feeder 47.

An amendment is forthcoming.

1-EP701

The Ground Conductors for the 5 KV Feeders energizing PW8- XFMR-3, PW8-DP-1 through PW8- DP-5, and PW8-MDP-2 through PW8-MDP-4 have not been identified. Can you please size these conductors?

PW8-XFMR-3: #8 ground conductor, 600V insulation.

PW8-DP1-5: #6 ground conductor, 600V insulation per motor.

PW8-MDP2-4: #3 ground conductor, 600V insulation per motor.

PW8-MCC-DP: #5 ground conductor, 600V insulation.

PW8-MCC-MDP: #2/0 ground conductor, 600V insulation.

All equipment grounding conductors sized in accordance with NEC Article 250.122

1-ES603

Feeder 41 is listed as (3) #8 AWG and (1) #10 AWG Insulated Ground CU, 600V, RHH/RHW-2. The matrix identifies this feeder as being installed from Pumpwell 8 SWGR to Pumpwell 8 and as the 4.16KV- 480Y/277 XFMR Feeder. Can you please confirm the feeder conductor sizes and voltage rating?

Provide 3-1/C #2 AWG CU 5KV

133% EPR TS MV-104, #8 AWG

CU 600V ground conductor. An amendment is forthcoming.

Feeder #43 & Drawing

1-EP701

The electrical feeder being installed from PW8-SWGR to PW8-MCC- MDP is identified on 1-ES603 Feeder Tag #43 as (2) Sets of (3) #500 5 kv and (1) 1/0. This same feeder on 1-EP701 is depicted as (2) Sets of (3) #350 5 kv without a ground. Can you please confirm feeder and conduit sizes?

Provide two sets of 3-1/C

350KCMIL CU 5KV 133% EPR

TS MV-104, #2/0 CU 600V ground conductor. An amendment is forthcoming.

Drawings

1-EP101,

1-ES134 &

Sheet Keynote #19 and the Switchgear Heater Circuit depicted on Drawing 1-EP101 does not seem to be incorperated in the duct bank of Drawing 1-ES134. Can you please confirm?

Provide Switchgear Heater circuit consisting of 2#6 AWG, 1#10 AWG ground conductors, 600V insulation in 6" conduit from the Switchgear to Pumpwell as part of the 12-way duct bank - callout #49.

An amendment is forthcoming.

1-ES128

The Telecomm Duct Bank shown on 1-ES128 is identified as (1) 6" spare conduit and (1) F1 feeder in 4" conduit. The same Duct Bank transitions into (1) 4" spare conduit and (1) F1 feeder in 4" conduit via the corresponding matchline drawing. Can you please confirm that this 6" spare conduit should be a 4" spare conduit?

Concur. The spare telecom duct on 1-ES128 must be 4" diameter.

1.2 General

Overview of Contract

This paragraph describes several items to be completed in Phase 1 such as the Pumpwell 8 micropile foundation and the pumpwell drainage piping routed through the abandoned South flooding flume, whereas the solicitation drawings and Price Proposal Form show these items being CLIN 0002AD and 0002AC respectively. The Price Proposal Form states that the work described in these Contract Line Items are to be performed in Phase

2. Please clarify which Phase is intended and please provide some reasoning why the additional work was moved from Phase 1 to Phase 2.

Pumpwell micropile foundations and pumpwell drainage pipe routed through the abandoned South flooding flumes are included in CLIN 0002 and in Phase 2 construction.

Solicitation Attachment I - PIEE Solicitation Vendor Access Instructions are not listed with the Solicitation.

Please see Amendment 0006 for Attachment I.

12 00 21 16 Factor 1

Corp Experience

Section 00 21 16, Corporate Experience, Page 12 under Complexity it states that Offerors are to “Ensure that project descriptions clearly address how each project meets the scope and complexity requirements as delineated above, and provides the final construction cost. The absence of any such information may result in the Project being considered Not Relevant, which could result in a rating of UNACCEPTABLE for this factor”. Further down Page 12 it is stated that Offerors are required to use Attachment C and that each project data sheet must not exceed 2 single sided pages. Two (2) single sided pages are insufficient space to be able to properly address all of the corporate experience criteria identified in the Solicitation as well at the information required per Attachment C. Please increase the page limit for Corporate Experience to three (3) single sided pages to ensure that all relevant criteria can be provided. This will ensure that there is not an absence of information and that a subsequent UNACCEPTABLE rating is not given as a result.

Please see Amendment 0006 for revised Section 3 EVALUATION

FACTORS FOR AWARD.

Solicitation

Due to the level of complexity and sequencing of the work we respectfully request a 4 week bid extension from May 3, 2022 to May 31, 2022. This will allow the contractor to put together the most competitive proposal for this project.

Please see Amendment 0005.

26 32 15.00 2.1.6

Phase 1: Requires generator set enclosure to be NEMA-3R corrosion resistant. Please clarify what is acceptable. Is a marine grade aluminum enclosure acceptable or will stainless steel be required. If stainless steel is required, is 304 stainless steel acceptable or will 316 stainless steel be acceptable

Minimum 12 gauge, 316 stainless steel is required.

26 32 15.00 2.28.3

Phase 1: Requires load bank enclosure to be NEMA-3R corrosion resistant. Please clarify what is acceptable. Is a marine grade aluminum enclosure acceptable or will stainless steel be required. If stainless steel is required, is 304 stainless steel acceptable or will 316 stainless steel be acceptable

Minimum 12 gauge, 316 stainless steel is required.

26 32 15.00 2.1.6

Phase 2: Requires generator set enclosure to be NEMA-3R corrosion resistant. Please clarify what is acceptable. Is a marine grade aluminum enclosure acceptable or will stainless steel be required. If stainless steel is required, is 304 stainless steel acceptable or will 316 stainless steel be acceptable

Minimum 12 gauge, 316 stainless steel is required.

26 32 15.00 2.6

Phase 1: The requirements for the fuel system are not clear. The specifications require fuel transfer pumps mounted on a day tank. What a the capacity requirements for the day tank?

Capacity of the generator sub-base day tank must store enough fuel for a minimum 4-hour runtime. Consult generator manufacturer for specific gal/hour fuel consumption.

26 32 15.00 2.6

Phase 2: The requirements for the fuel system are not clear. The specifications require fuel transfer pumps mounted on a day tank. What a the capacity requirements for the day tank?

Capacity of the generator sub-base day tank must store enough fuel for a minimum 4-hour runtime. Consult generator manufacturer for specific gal/hour fuel consumption.

26 32 15.00 2.8.2.1

Phase 1: The specification requirements for the radiator mention that a corrosion resistant film may be applied to the radiator but does not indicate that this is a requirement. Please confirm is a corrosion resistant radiator core is required as there are concerns that the radiator would corrode prematurely if this is not required

Required for a corrosion resistant film to be applied.

26 32 15.00 2.8.2.1

Phase 2: The specification requirements for the radiator mention that a corrosion resistant film may be applied to the radiator but does not indicate that this is a requirement. Please confirm is a corrosion resistant radiator core is required as there are concerns that the radiator would corrode prematurely if this is not required

Required for a corrosion resistant film to be applied.

00 21 16

We are currently operating in an environment of very volatile and escalating prices for many of the materials required for this Project. There does not appear to be any provision in the IFB and Amendments providing an economic price adjustment to the Contractor for material price escalation occurring between the bid date and the ordering of materials. In accordance with FAR 16.203, DFAR 216.203-4, and DFARS PGI 216.203-4, will the government consider inclusion of an economic price adjustment clause providing for price adjustments to critical materials and components for the Project?

There is no economic price adjustment clause included in the solicitation. Bid per RFP.

Generator Emissions Clarificatio n

Phase 1 & 2: Generator Emissions Clarification – Please confirm that a tier 2 emissions certified generator is required vs. a tier 4 final generator. The units are required to be prime stamped but the intended use is not clear.

The intended use is for emergency standby power, and Tier 2 emissions certification is therefore required.

26 32 15.00

2.5.1 and

2.25

Phase 1 & 2: These paragraphs are in contradiction with each other. Please clarify whether a steel sub-base or stainless steel sub-base is required. Further, is the intent to have a stainless steel sub-base or sub-base day tank for the enclosure? If a stainless steel sub-base is required for either the generator set assembly and/or the enclosure assembly, we are not sure if we can meet this requirement at this time and may have to take exception

Requirement is for a steel sub-base with a corrosion resistant coating applied. Project requirement is for the generator sub base to include a day tank; drawing 1-M-502 depicts the fuel storage requirement.

Drawing 1-

EP701

Phase 1 – Drawing 1-EP701 – Requires two medium voltage circuit breakers within the generator enclosure assembly. Please confirm that these are required as it will increase the footprint of the package and be much larger than what is shown on the plans. Circuit breakers are not required at the generator set for a medium voltage system, only low voltage. We would suggest removing the 1200A/225AF circuit breaker entirely and incorporating the 1200AF/175A load bank circuit

225A circuit breaker included in the PW8-GENERATOR package can be removed in its entirety; given proximity to generator, 225A circuit breaker in the PW8-SWGR package will serve as the sole means of protection between PW9- GENERATOR and PW8-SWGR.

breaker into the PW8-SWGR line-up

Drawing 2-

EP751

Phase 2 – Drawing 2-EP751 – Requires a medium voltage circuit breaker within the generator enclosure assembly. Please confirm that this is required as it will increase the footprint of the package and be much larger than what is shown on the plans. Circuit breakers are not required at the generator set for a medium voltage system, only low voltage. We would suggest removing the 1200A/650AF circuit breaker entirely

650A circuit breaker included in the PS6-GENERATOR and PS8- GENERATOR package to be removed entirely; 650A circuit breaker in the PS6-SWGR and PS8- SWGR package will serve as the sole means of protection between PS6-GENERATOR and PS6- SWGR / PS8-GENERATOR and

PS8-SWGR.

Solicitation

Additional Solicitation Requireme nts

A

Due to the complexity of the project, and PPI's submitted, we would like to respectfully request a bid extension of 3 weeks from the listed proposal due date?

Please see Amendment 0005.

Solicitation

00 10 00

In addition to Attachment H - Price Proposal Form are the Net Amounts on Pages 3 thru 5 of the Solicitation to be filled out and included in the Price Proposal as well?

Please see p. 10 of the solicitation.

Pricing information is not required to be completed under Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation Contract Form in SF 1442.

34 45 01 2.1

Please advise as to the basis of design (manufacturer and model number) for the salt water supply pumps specified in Spec. 34 45 01.

Basis of design for saltwater supply pumps is Goulds VIT 20GHC.

35 45 04.00

2.2

Please advise as to the basis of design (manufacturer and model number) for the drainage pumps specified in Spec. 35 45 04.00 10.

Basis of design for Pumpwell drainage pumps is Flygt CT 3531.

1-M-601

Please advise as to the basis of design (manufacturer and model number) for the sump pumps listed Pump Schedule on sheet no. 1-M- 601.

Basis of design for Pumpwell sump pumps is Flygt NS 3171.

1-M-601 Please advise as to the basis of design (manufacturer and model number) for the fuel oil transfer pumps listed in Fuel Oil Transfer

Basis of design for fuel oil transfer pumps is Franklin Fueling Systems

STP33.

Pump Schedule on sheet no. 1-M- 601.

1-M-601

Please advise as to the basis of design (manufacturer and model number) for the fuel oil polishing unit listed in Fuel Oil Polishing Unit Schedule on sheet no. 1-M-601.

Basis of design for fuel oil polishing unit is Simplex SF15.

2-M-601

Please advise as to the basis of design (manufacturer and model number) for the sump pumps listed Pump Schedule on sheet no. 2-M- 601.

Basis of design for Pump Station sump pumps is Flygt NS 3085.

20 of 74 Solicitation

No date and time was listed for delivery of the Non-Price and Price HARD COPY proposal. We request that the HARD COPIES be delivered within five (5) business days after the date and time listed in the Solicitation for the ELECTRONIC PIEE system submission.

Please see Amendment 0006 for revised Section 4.2 PROPOSAL

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS.

1-M-601

The Valve Schedule as shown on 1- M-601, indicates that Valve PW8- V-10 is a 30” Gate Valve, but when coordinating with drawing 1- MP105, this valve is assumed to be 24” based on the fittings connection to it. Can you please confirm that this valve and all connecting pipe and fittings are to be provided as 24”.

Confirmed Valve PW8-V-10 and connecting pipe and fittings are 24".

For all New Ductile Iron Piping Passing through existing Concrete walls/floors and connecting to existing piping being reused, what is the preferred method to connect these piping systems? No specific specification or detail on any type of Coupling or Flange Coupling Adapter was found to address this application/installation. One specific building location for reference is shown on Drawing 1- MP301 - Pumpwell 8/Drainage Pumps 1, 2, and 3. Please confirm what is to be provided here and at any other building location with these same types of installations.

Connections of New to Existing ductile iron piping are to reuse the existing to remain pipe's flange for making connections. Existing flanges are present at all locations new pipe is installed and connected to existing.

2-M-102 On Drawing 2-M-102, what size eccentric reducer connecting to pumps PS6-P-1, 2, and 3 needs to be provided? Please confirm. No

Coordinate reducer size with purchased pump discharge connection size. Basis of design specific pump size can be found in the specifications or drawings.

utilized an 18"x20" eccentric reducer for pumps PS6-P-1, 2, & 3.

2-M-102

As shown on Drawing 2-M-102, what size Air Release and Vacuum Breaker Valves should be provided at Pumps PS6-P-1, 2, and 3? No specific size can be found in the specifications or drawings. Please confirm.

Provide minimum 3" Air Release and Vacuum Breaker Valves.

2-M-105

On Drawing 2-M-105, what size eccentric reducer connecting pumps PS8-P-1, 2, and 3 needs to be provided? Please confirm. No specific pump size can be found in the specifications or drawings.

Coordinate reducer size with purchased pump discharge connection size. Basis of design utilized an 18"x20" eccentric reducer for pumps PS8-P-1, 2, & 3.

2-M-105

As shown on Drawing 2-M-105, what size Air Release and Vacuum Breaker Valves should be provided at Pumps PS8-P-1, 2, and 3? No specific size can be found in the specifications or drawings. Please confirm.

Provide minimum 3" Air Release and Vacuum Breaker Valves.

2-M-303

As shown on Drawing 2-M-303, BFV PS8-V-18 is shown to be contained in a 4” SWS Line, but the Mechanical Schedule on 2-M-602 indicates this valve to be 6” in size. Please confirm what the correct size valve is to be provided here.

BFV PS8-V-18 to be 4" diameter as shown in A1/2-M-303.

1-CD107

1364315_d wg_04of18

_PH1_V1_

Civil

Keynotes indicates the removal of a Storm Drain. The drawings are showing a 24" Sanitary Sewer Line.

What is the type of utility to be removed?

The utility to be removed is a previously abandoned 10" ductile iron sanitary sewer force main, follow the pipe towards the dry dock and the pipe size and material are labeled. The 24" pipe is sewer main that the pipe in question ties into.

1-CD108

1364315_d wg_04of18

Drawings indicate a Electrical Line Removal. The key notes don't indicate any Electrical Line Removal. Is the Electrical Line shown on the drawings to be removed?

Drawing does not indicate Electrical Line removal. Demo hash marks are shown only on compressed air, oxygen, and propane on this drawing.

1-SD-102

1364315_d wg_05of18 _Ph1_v1_st ructural

What is the thickness of the concrete equipment pads that are to be demolished, indicated by keynote D16

The equipment pads are approximately 4".

1-SD-202

1364315_d wg_05of18

What is the size of the steel beams that are to be demolished, indicated by keynote D3

The column shown for demolition has an approximate size comparable to a W8x31.

1-SD-201,

1-S-301

1364315_d wg_05of18

Plansheet SD 201 indicates demolishing unreinforced lean concrete fill down to El. 23’ 3-1/4”.

Plansheet S-301, Section A1 depicts a concrete slab with BOC elevation to be 24’10”.

There is a elevation difference of 1’6-3/4" between the two.

Please provide clarification on why there is an elevation difference and if the contractor is required to backfill.

The dry pit pile cap is stepped down in the vicinity of the 18" sump pit such that the low part of the cap is at EL 23'-4" and the high part of the cap at 24'-10". See A1/S-302 for the section that shows the 1'-6" difference. The contractor may selectively demo the recessed portion of the cap or excavate down to a constant elevation (lowest point) and backfill up 1'-6" around the recess depending on means and methods.

2-CD108

Keynote 12 refences Detail C3 on 1-CD501. There isn't a Detail C3 on 1-CD501. What detail is keynote 12 referencing?

See Detail A5 on 1-CD501.

Solicitation SF 1442

We request a four week extension to the bid submission date to allow for subcontractors and small business companies adequate time to prepare proposals for this highly complex rehabilitation project?

Please see Amendment 0005.

1-B-003, 2-

CD114

1364315_d wg_04of18

Drawing 2-CD114 keynote #7 assumes 3'-6" thick reinforced concrete. Boring Log ID 20-GETB- 08 indicates 92" of concrete. Please confirm that 3'-6" depth of bombproof concrete removal is sufficient for the installation of new utilities around Pumpwell 8.

Utilize 3'-6" for demolition depth of bombproof concrete removal. The boring is located in an area of thickened slab. Thickened slab is not expected to be encountered within the construction limits.

1-SD401

1364315_d wg_05of18

Keynote 1 states: Install Government furnished cofferdam and to reference Government to Provide Response DWG NOs.

12715118 TO 1215125. These were not provided, please provide these plansheets.

These drawings are provided as Appendix A7 to the specifications, starting on page 73 of 539 from Spec Appendices Vol 1of 2.

2-CD110

1364315_d wg_12of18

_PH2_V3_

Keynote 10 states: remove concrete utility tunnel and associated utilities. Please confirm that the utility tunnel continues parallel to Berth 39 between the indicated end points.

The removal limits of the concrete utility tunnel are within the solid shaded area only.

2-CD110

1364315_d wg_12of18

Keynote 10 states: remove concrete utilities. Please confirm that the utility tunnel dimensions and associated utilities are the same as indicated on 2-CD221.

2-CD110 and 2-CD221 are not showing the same utility tunnels.

Utility tunnel dimensions and associated utilities are not the same.

Refer to drawings 2-CD107 and 2- CD112 for utility tunnel that is shown in enlarged view on 2-

CD221.

2-CD114

1364315_d wg_12of18

Keynote 11 states: remove concrete utilities. Please confirm that the utility tunnel dimensions and associated utilities are the same as indicated on 2-CD221.

2-CD114 and 2-CD221 are not showing the same utility tunnels.

Utility tunnel dimensions and associated utilities are not the same.

Refer to drawings 2-CD107 and 2- CD112 for utility tunnel that is shown in enlarged view on 2-

CD221.

1-CD114

1364315_d wg_04of18

Drawing 1-CD114 keynote #12 states: Remove Storm Drain and replace as shown on the utility plans. No storm drains are indicated for removal. Please indicate which storm drains are to be removed.

Replace Keynote 12 with "Not Used."

1-CU202

1364315_d w

_04of18_P H1_V1_Ci vil

Please clarify the electric ductbank configuration: Plan sheet 1-CU202 labels the ductbank for profile C1 (run EMH-1-08 to EMH-1-09) as 3Wx5D. On plan sheet 1-ES132 the run is shown as 3Wx4D.

Utilize 3Wx5D.

1-CU202

1364315_d w

_04of18_P configuration: Plan sheet 1-CU202 labels the ductbank for profile C2 (run EMH-1-09 to Ex EMH-1499) as 3Wx5D. On plan sheet 1-ES127 (Vol 2) the run is shown as 3Wx4D.

Utilize 3Wx5D.

1-CU203

1364315_d w

_04of18_P configuration: Plan sheet 1-CU203 labels the ductbank for profile A3 (run EMH-N11 to North Substation) as 5Wx3D. On plan sheet 1-ES128 (Vol 2) the run is shown as 4Wx4D.

Utilize 5Wx3D.

1-CU203

1364315_d w

_04of18_P

Please revise the caption for profile A2 for EMH-02 to EMH-1-08, on sheet 1-CU203

Revise the caption for A2/1-CU203 to "ELECTRIC DUCTBANK

EMH-1-08 TO SOUTH

SUBSTATION"

1-CU203

1364315_d w

_04of18_P

Please revise the caption for profile A1 for EX EMH-0S3 to EX EMH- 1490, on sheet 1-CU203

No change. The caption is correct.

1-CU114

1364315_d w

_04of18_P

Please provide profiles for the piping noted in Keynotes Items #13

- #24, on plan sheet 1-CU114 .

Additional data provided to keynotes, see Amendment.

1-CU207

1364315_d w

_04of18_P

Please clarify the telecom ductbank configuration: Plan sheet 1-CU207 labels the ductbank for profile A1 (run TMH-1-10 to TMH-1-11) as 418 LF. On plan sheet 1-CU208 profile C1 is labeled 403 LF. This ductbank run is labeled as 2Wx1D on sheet 1-CU207 and 1-CU208.

Utilize 429 LF of 2Wx1D.

On sheets 1-ES128 & 1-ES129 the run is shown as 1Wx2D.

1-CU208

1364315_d w

_04of18_P

Please clarify the telecom ductbank configuration: Plan sheet 1-CU208 labels the ductbank for profiles A1 and C1 (run TMH-1-11 to TMH-1-

12) as 2Wx1D. On plan sheets 1- ES128 and 1-ES129 (Vol 2) the run is shown as 1Wx2D.

Utilize 2Wx1D.

General General General

Is there an existing site dewatering system that will remain active so that the contractor will not need dewatering during installation of the pumpstations.

Contractor to provide dewatering to facilitate construction activities for the project. There will be no active existing dewatering systems.

Solicitation

4.2 Proposal

Submission Instructions

Please confirm the time of the electronic submittal will dictate the timeliness of the proposal submission, instead of the delivery time and date of the mailed hard copy. We request the hard copy be delivered within 24 hours of the electronic submittal.

The RFP states, "PIEE system will record the date and time of package submittal. The date and time of package submittal recorded in PIEE shall govern the timeliness of any proposal submission." Please see Amendment 0006 for revised Section 4.2 PROPOSAL

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

for hard copy due dates.

5 3

Will this engagement be subject to the 252.204-7019 clause? If so, what level of assessment will be needed (Basic, Medium, High)?

FAR 252.204-7019 is incorporated by reference in the solicitation.

Basic assessment.

Will this engagement be subject to the 252.204-7012 clause? Do you anticipate that there will be controlled unclassified information documentation on this effort?

FAR 252.204-7012 is incorporated by reference in the solicitation. Bid per RFP.

Will this engagement be subject to the Export Control provisions as referenced in 252.225-7048?

FAR 252.225-7048 is incorporated by reference in the solicitation.

Solicitation 4.3 PPI's

We request the deadline for questions be extended to a minimum of 2 weeks along with the bid submission date.

Please see Amendment 0005.

2-M-601, Please advise as to the basis of design (manufacturer and model number) for the stop logs listed in the Stop Log Schedules on sheet nos. 2-M-601 and 2-M-602.

Basis of design for stop logs is Rodney Hunt custom stoplog.

1-S-104, 1-S-201

Price Proposal

Form

The keynote reference X4 on sheets 1-S-104 and 1-S-201 indicate the 10 ton monorail to be in CLIN0006.

The Price Proposal Form indicates it is in CLIN0005. Please confirm the price proposal form is correct.

The stop log per the price proposal form is CLIN0005 and the 10T hoist is CLIN0006. The price proposal form will be revised in an amendment.

2-SB507,

2-SB508

A sec D1/2-SB508 is shown cut at pump foundation edge on partial plans B1 and B3 of SB-507. The D1/2-SB508 section detail does not seem correct for that location.

Please provide where this embed plate is actually located and indicate what section applies on the abovementioned location on SB507.

Detail D1/2-SB508 is not used.

1.2 General

Overview of Contract

This paragraph describes work to be completed in proximity to Berth 39 bulkhead. Please clarify the maximum ground pressure allowed for demolition/construction activities at Berths 39 above the existing timber relieving platform.

See Y&D Drawing No. 165165.

1 Solicitation # 13

We are asking that the current Bid Date be extended for at the very least two weeks to compile a proper, concise, and accurate quote.

Please see Amendment 0005.

Solicitation Page 12 of

We have an active project that we believe meets the scope and complexity requirements for Factor 1 Corporate Experience. The current contract value is just below the $75,000,000 requirement, but the project is not yet complete and has the potential to increase. We feel that the overall magnitude of the project and similarity in scope would still provide adequate relevant experience. Would there be any consideration to reducing the contract value minimum requirements to include a project greater than $70,000,000?

Bid Per RFP.

With the site visit being held 4/14/22 and the PPI due date being 4/19/22, we do not feel that there is adequate time to assess the takeaways from the site visit and conduct a thorough comparison with the contract documents due to the complexity of the work.

Additionally, there were photographs that were taken during the site visit which have not yet been published which will also need to be reviewed and could generate additional PPIs. Assuming that the site visit photos will be published reasonably soon, we kindly request that the proposal due date be extended to 5/26/22, and in doing so, extending the PPI submission deadline.

Please see Amendment 0005.

2-SD405

1364315_d wg_13of18

Structural

Section A1 on 2-SD405 is missing the TIP El for the HP12x74 pile. Is it to be the same as the SSP? Please confirm/provide clarification.

Tip EL for HP12x74 is EL 32.0.

2-SD405

1364315_d wg_13of18

What is the length of the WT10.5x25. The Plans don’t show the dimensions or provide elevations.

Tip EL for WT10.5x25 is EL 39.0.

2-SD302

1364315_d wg_13of18

Section C1&A1 on 2-SD302 indicates that there is an existing concrete cap on top of the timber beams and timber pile. Please provide the size/dimensions of the existing concrete cap.

Existing concrete cap is shown on PW Drawing No. 20940 And Dry Dock Associates (DD Assoc) Drawing No. NQ515 "REDISGN

OF CORNER QUAY WALL

NORTH OF DD8".

2-SD405 Plan Sheet Please provide the complete sheet pile designation for the Combi-Wall Sheets

This is non-standard combi-wall, but the pipe and sheets are aviable, and the system width is indicated.

The Contactor may design with standard combi-walls if desired, provided that the average section modulus, and moment of inertia is greater than what is indicated on the drawings.

2-SD405 Plan Sheet

Please provide the Cut-Off and Tip Elevation for the HP12x74 Piles associated with the existing concrete sheet piles at Pump Station 6 shown in Section A1 on Sheet 2-

SD405.

Cut-Off EL and Tip EL for HP12x74 is EL 77.0 and EL 32.0 respectively.

1-MD115 Plan Sheet

Plan sheet 1-MD115 shows temporary plugs to be installed in the intake culverts of Main Drainage Pumps 1, 2, 3, and 4, to facilitate construction in Pumpwell 8 when the drydock is flooded. Are these temporary plugs to be removed at the end of Phase 1 construction to facilitate the aircraft carrier docking that will occur between Phase 1 and 2 construction? Are these temporary plugs reinstalled during Phase 2 construction to facilitate the construction that occurs in Pumpwell 8 during Phase 2 when the drydock is flooded?

Temporary plugs are required in Phase 1 and Phase 2 to allow work to be performed in the Pumpwell 8 suction chamber. Remove temporary plugs at completion of each phase. Pumpwell is required to be operational after completion of Phase 1 to facilitate the aircraft carrier docking occuring between Phases.

1-MP115 Plan Sheet

Plan sheet 1-MP115 shows plugs to be installed in the vertical flooding flume culverts of Main Drainage Pumps 2, 3, and 4. Are these plugs permanent construction? Can details be provided for the construction of these plugs if they are permanent work?

Plugs indicated on sheet 1-MP115 and Note 75 are temporary structures. These are intended to show location of concrete formwork used in filling of the vertical sections of the flooding flume culverts. All sections of flooding flume above the "plugs" are to be completely filled with flowable fill.

1-MP115 Plan Sheet

Plan sheet 1-MP115 shows, and Note 76 directs, to "Post installation of piping fill flooding flume with flowable fill". Are the vertical flooding flume culverts for Main Drainage Pumps 1, 2, 3, and 4, which tie into the flooding flume, also to be filled with flowable fill or is formwork to be installed to prevent the flowable fill from filling the vertical culverts?

Vertical flooding flume culverts are to be filled. All section of flooding flume culverts above the "plugs" indicated on sheet 1-MP115 and Note 75 are to be completely filled with flowable fill after completion of pipe installation.

Vol 2 pg. 9 31 62 16.13 2.3.2

Specification states, "Support and guide hammers with fixed extended leads or fixed underhung leads.

Provide two intermediate supports for the pile in the leads to reduce the unbraced length of the pile during driving and pulling." Please clarify whether this is required for the impact hammers, vibratory hammers, or both types of pile hammers.

Leads are required only for impact hammers.

1-S-301 Plan Sheet Please provide size and spacing for embedded dowels shown in Section A1 & A2 on sheet 1-S-301 for the P8 Chamber Pit Floor

The dowels are the same diameter as the primary reinforcement (#9) for the pile cap provided at the same spacing (12").

2-SD405 Plan Sheet

Sections A1, A2 & A3 on sheet 2- SD405 depict mud line at approximately elevation 77 to the right of the existing concrete sheet pile bulkhead. Section A3 2-SD405 Has a note that points to this mud line area that states "LIMITS OF

EXCAVATION FOR

INSTALLATION OF INTAKE

STRUCTURE".

Demolition Sections C1 & A1 on 2- SD302 do not depict any excavation necessary behind the existing concrete sheet pile bulkhead. Please clarify if excavation is necessary in sections C1 & A2 on 2-SD302.

Minimum Limits of excavation is equal to timber pile cut off

EL79.5(+/-).

2-SD302 Plan Sheet Please clarify the lower elevation limit of the #57 stone backfill (keynote 26) depicted in sections C1 & A1 on sheet 2-SD302.

The lower elevation limit of #57 stone backfill is the Limits of excavation EL 79.5 (+/-).

1-S-505 Plan Sheet Section A1 note states "TOC EL PED PER SCHEDULE" Please provide the referenced table.

There isn't a schedule provided for the pedestals but rather the height is to be coordinated with the final installation and the height of the manufacturer provided pedestals for discharge connection.

1-MD104 Plan Sheet

1-MD104 is clouded X1 to show that (E)MDP-1 is removed in CLIN 0002 (Phase 2). Subsequent drawings 1-MD301 and 1-MD302 are not clouded as such. Drawing 1-MP302 showing the new DP-4,5 located in place of MDP-1 removal is also not clouded with an X1.

Please clarify what Phase and CLIN MDP-1 removal and installation of new DP-4,5 are to be included under.

MDP-1 removal and installation of new DP-4,5 are to occur in Phase 2 and are associated with CLIN 0002.

Note CLIN clouds are only indicated on plan drawings. Refer to sheet 1-M-001 GENERAL

MECHANICAL NOTES #20.

1-MD115 Plan Sheet

Please provide anticipated dates and durations of caisson removal from the dry dock as stated in Keynote 172 for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 work. This information is needed for scheduling and sequencing of the work in the dry dock.

Refer to Specification Section 01 14

00.00 22 WORK RESTRICTIONS

paragraph 1.4 for Special Scheduling Requirements. An Amendment will be issued for Section 01 14 00.00 22. Caisson is expected to be in dock for duration of Phase 2 work.

2-SS505, 2-

M8115

Price Proposal

Form

The keynote on both sheets reference X3 on sheets 2-SS505 and 2-MS115 indicate the stop log and foundation to be in CLIN0005. The Price Proposal Form indicates it is in CLIN0006. Please confirm the price proposal form is correct.

The stop log per the price proposal form is CLIN 0005 and the 10T hoist is CLIN 0006. The price proposal form will be revised in an amendment.

2-MS109 Plan Sheet

Plan sheet 2-MS109 shows, and Note 76 directs, to "Post installation of piping fill flooding flume with flowable fill". Are the vertical flooding flume culverts, which tie into the flooding flume, also to be filled with flowable fill or is formwork to be installed to prevent the flowable fill from filling the vertical culverts?

Vertical flooding flume culverts are to be filled. Provide temporary "plug" concrete formwork at culvert connection to dock floor as indicated on sheet 2-MS109 and Note 75. All section of culvert above "plug" are to be completely filled with flowable fill after completion of pipe installation.

2-SD402 Plan Sheet Plan sheet 2-SD402 shows, and Note 20 directs, to "Construct five tie beams . . . ". Please provide details for the tie beams.

Delete "five" from Note 20 on 2- SD402. See Note 20 on 2-SD302.

Please provide coating requirements and specifications for permanent Pipe Pile, H-Pile, and Sheet Pile for the project.

The steel piling on this project, permanent, and temporary are uncoated.

1-SS501, 2-

SS502

Plan Sheet

Sheet Note 7 on 1-SS501 and 2- SS502 states, "Crane rail support system must match the load carrying capacity of the existing system." This note is called out under Section C5, "Crane Rail Clip (TYP) See Note 7". Does note 7 only pertain to the crane rail clip?

If not, please provide additional information on what this note is referring to.

Correct, this note refers to the crane rail clips.

2MS108-

Key Note 91 indicates that the expansion joints must have min. 5" of expansion and compression.

Does this note apply to the expansion joints at the SW return utility station shown on MS501 detail C also or only those noted on the DWG's?

Keynote 91 applies to CWHR piping only. Expansion joint at SW return utility stations shown on MS501 detail C are to be selected by the contractor and coordinated with pipe thermal expansions and contraction of specific station location and associated pipe size.

2MS109,11

4 & 521

33 11 00.01

Spec 33 11 00.01 22.2.1.2.2 indicates that the salt water check valves are to be and iron body double door wafer style valve.

However, they are shown in 2MS109, 114 & 521 as swing type check valves. Which is correct? If wing type will a spec be provided for above 12"?

Spec 33 11 00.01 22 will be updated to include swing type check valve.

For sheet 2-MS109 and 2-MS114 provide 30" Swing check as indicated by Keynote 59. Swing check valve must be ductile iron body and disc, comply with AWWA Standard 508, be epoxy coated inside and out, and have bronze metal seats. For sheet 2- MS521 provide UL312 double door wafer style check valves.

2MS109 &

DWG 2MS503 Detail A-1 shows a isolation drain valve but does not specify what type valve is required.

Is a gate valve acceptable?

Gate or ball valve is acceptable.

2MS108 -

Key Not 56 on DWG's 2MS108 - 114 indicate connection to existing 4 draings and reference detail A4 DWG 2MS502 which indicates existing 3" draings and hose. Which is correct?

Sheet 2-MS502 detail A4 is correct.

Drain is 3".

2MS108 -

Spec 33 11 00.01 22.2.1.1.3.1 indicates HDPE pressure class rating shall be "as indicates on drawings". We find no pipe schedule or notations for the "CU" DWG's (buried). What pressure rating must the buried pipe be?

Note: DR11 is the highest rating that can be obtained for pipe larger than 24".

HDPE piping is located in dry dock and in flooding flumes. No HDPE piping is buried. HDPE piping is shown on mechanical drawings and is used for drainage pump discharge, sump pump discharge, CWHR, and saltwater return. Refer to sheet 1-M-601 and 2-MS601 for schedule.

2MS115 \

DWG 2MS115 shows capping 24" & 6" lines for abandonment at the new stop log device. What type of pipe is existing and do they have flanges for installation of a blind flange?

Existing pipe is CML Ductile Iron.

Provide permanent pipe plug consisting of grout and flowable fill.

2MS521

22.2.1.2.3

Spec 2.1.2.3 indicates the butterfly valves at the riser station are to be wafer lug style. However, all of the valves shown on DWG 2MS521 are shown as flanged. Which is correct?

Provide wafer style butterfly valves as specified. For valves at ship connection, provide flange at outlet of valve to accept hose connection as specified. For butterfly valves located adjacent to check valves, provide a short piece of flaged pipe as necessary to provide flanges to secure wafer butterfly valve and wafer check valve. At locations other than those mentioned above, butterfly valves shall be secured between either flanges of pipes and/or fittings.

2M102,2M

Drawings 2-M102 & 2-M105 have Air Release Assemblies on the 20” SRS lines in Pump Stations 6 &

8. There are no details for these and no schedules for their size requirements. Please provide the size required and a detail for them.

Provide minimum 3" Air Release and Vacuum Breaker Valves.

Provide valve in accordance with specification 40 05 13 §2.11.1 Air Release and Vacuum Breakers.

ALL

22.3.12.1.5

Spec 33 11 00.01 22.3.12.1.5 indicates that flanged pipe will only be installed above garage or in vaults. However, the spec for the buried butterfly valves 33 11 00.01

22.2.1.2.4 requires them to be flanged and thus will require a flange adapter at the connection. Is this acceptable?

Yes, acceptable. A flange adaptor or a specialty flange/bell fitting may be utilized for 36" buried butterfly valve connection to piping. Fitting must be fabricated by the same manufacturer that is providing the piping and be integral to the pipe system design.

2M101 -

33 11 00.01 22.2.1.2.3 & 40 05

13.2.8.7.1

Regarding the Pump Station vavles, Spec 331100.01 2.1.2.3 (SALT

WATER UTILITY

DISTRUBUTION PIPING) calls for DI body lug style, yet Spec

400513 (PIPELINES, LIQUID

PROCESS PIPING) 2.8.7.1 calls for SSTL body lug style. Further, the valve schedules on Drawings 2- M601 & 2-M602 call for SSTL body Flange style and the drawings appear to show these valves Flanged. What body material and end connections required for these Butterfly Valves?

For Pump Station valves provide Lug style butterfly valves with materials as indicated on sheets 2- M601 and 2-M602 VALVE SCHEDULES and as specified in Spec 40 05 13 PIPELINES, LIQUID PROCESS PIPING

§2.8.7.1.

2MS323

Details C1 & C2 show check valves on the sanitary line connected to the saltwater line. It is shown as a wafer type check but there is no specification for wafer checks in the Spec 33 30 00. Should the specification for wafer checks in Spec 33 11 00.001 22 be used or should this be a swing type check?

The check valves in question are the part of the saltwater flush for the sanitary system.