Amendment 0009.pdf
PDF 92 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N4008521R1225
About this file
This document contains an amendment to a solicitation for the Dry Dock 2 Complex project at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, Maine. The amendment provides updated drawings, specifications, and a price proposal form, as well as responses to pre-award inquiries. It revises drawings and specifications for site and foundation work, the dockside complex, and the shipside complex. The amendment also provides clarification on concrete coatings and floor finishes. The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number N4008521R1225 for construction services at the Dry Dock 2 Complex at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, issued by the Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 131 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
The purpose of this amendment is to provide updated draw ings and specifications, an updated price proposal form, and responses to the remaining PPIs. As of this amendment, there are no PPIs outstanding.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 3
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 17-May-2021
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008521R1225
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
22-Mar-2021
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
17-May-2021
CODE
NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC
ACQUISITION CORE
9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE
NORFOLK VA 23511-3095
N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
N4008521R1225
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)
The following have been added by full text:
AMENDMENT 0009
The purpose of this amendment is to provide updated drawings and specifications, an updated price proposal form, and responses to the remaining PPIs.
CONTINUATION SHEET (Drawing and Specification Edits)
Volume 1 – Site and Foundations:
NAVFAC Dwg. Nos. are revised as of May 2021. These revised drawings accompany this amendment.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12839038 (CD-101) Demo of the steam and condensate adjacent to Building 346 has been removed from the scope.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12839042 (C-101) Clarification provided for fire lane striping.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12839043 (C-102) Installation of relocated condensate line removed from scope.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12839048 (C-107) Modifications to trench drains on the south overhead door and west personnel door of the M-140.
Volume 2 – Dockside Complex:
NAVFAC Dwg. Nos. are revised as of May 2021. These revised drawings accompany this amendment.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12839175 (S-505) Clarification of fall arrest system on C1 and removal of security gate on ladders.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12839197 (S-533) Detail clarifications on D2, A4, and A5.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12839225 (A-110) Clarified slope exterior to door 402.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12839313 (A-604) Clarified slope on detail B3 and added door top weatherstrip on details A3 and D3.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12839314 (A-605) Clarified slope on detail A3 and added door top weatherstrip on detail C5.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12839315 (A-606) Clarified slope on detail A2.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12839317 (A-608) Clarified threshold requirements on detail A1 and B2 and added door top weatherstrip on details D1 and D2.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 1289431 (E-501) Removed duplicate disconnect on one-line diagram.
Volume 3 – Shipside Complex:
NAVFAC Dwg. Nos. are revised as of May 2021. These revised drawings accompany this amendment.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12839538 (S-504) Clarification of fall arrest system on C1 and clarification of caged ladders on A1 and A3.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12839554 (S-520) Detail clarifications on A1 and A3.
On NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12839605 (A-601) Added door top weatherstrip to detail B5.
N4008521R1225
Specifications:
The following specification sections are revised as of May 2021. These revised specifications accompany this amendment.
Specification 08 71 00 Clarified threshold requirements in para 2.3.21 and included top door weatherstrip requirements in para 2.3.20.
Specification 27 10 00 Clarified horizontal copper requirements in 2.3.2.1 and provided schedule in para 2.3.2.1.1.
(End of Summary of Changes)
SOLICITATION NO. N40085‐21‐R‐1225
PROJECT TITLE/LOCATION: DRY DOCK 2 COMPLEX
PREAWARD INQUIRY FORM (TEMPLATE)
Page Section Para.
196 5/11/2021 Vol 2
Dwgs On A601 Finish Schedule Vol‐02, is the intent to provide a concrete coating as stated in section 09 90 00 at existing concrete floor finish areas listed on the schedule? Note #2 on S103 & S104 references that spec section but its not clear on the finish schedule.
Please see CLIN 0005 Concrete Repair and Sealer Ground Level Dockside for scope of note 2 on S103 & S104 on Volume 1. See updated specification 09 90 00 for clarlty of application.
Finish schedule on A‐601 does not include CLIN 0005.
197 5/11/2021 Vol 2 Dwgs
On A601 Finish Schedule Vol‐02, is the intent to provide a concrete coating as stated in section 09 67 23.13 epoxy floor finish areas listed on the schedule?
09 67 23.13 ‐ Resinous Flooring is applicable at EPOXY locations on the A‐ 601 which correlate with key note 6 on A‐101 & A‐102.
198 5/11/2021 Vol 3 Dwgs
On S‐121 and S‐525 (Vol 3), the passageway shown has no transverse floor members. The floor plate elevation is 5'‐ 5", which leaves a 1" gap between the bottom of floor plate and the top of building steel. Is this gap the intention, or is there supposed to be floor members or grating under the floor plate?
Grating D1 is present over entirety of Support Tower Level 1 including beneath passageway. Top of deck note on S‐525 is intended to indicate top of grating/underside of diamond plate. Refer to the updated drawings.
199 5/11/2021 Vol 3 Dwgs
On S‐121 and S‐525 (Vol 3), the passageway shown has two door openings (sec C4 and C5), each with different vertical dimensions, ie, top of door opening are at different elevations. Please provide detail showing elevation of passageway roof is intended and how roof is intended to transition from passageway roof to top of door openings.
Passageway ceiling elevation is constant ‐ door heights relate to passageway or ground‐level access functions. Wall above door head varies in dimension at the two openings.
REFERENCE
Question No. QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received
Posted on Amend No.
July 2011
PREAWARD INQUIRY FORM (TEMPLATE)
Page Section Para.
Question No. QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received
Amend No.
200 5/11/2021 7 05 12 00 1.4.3 Specification indicates that connection design is delegated to the GC/Fabricator. There are many connections details shown in both Vol 2 and Vol 3. Is GC expected to provide calculations for all connections, ie, even if connection is detailed in plans, or only for connections that are not shown?
Fabricator's engineer is responsible for all connections that are not part of the lateral load resisting system (i.e.
gravity connections). Calculations are required only for the connections designed by the fabricator's engineer ‐ connection details shown in the documents are to be used where indicated.
201 5/11/2021 7 05 52 00 2.2.9 Specification indicates capacity requirements for handrail.
Most (maybe all) handrail member sizing and connections are shown in both Vol 2 and Vol 3. To what extent, if any, Is GC expected to provide calculations for handrail?
No calculations for guardrails are required where sizes are indicated on drawings.
202 5/11/2021 7 05 51 33 2.3 Specification indicates GC is to provide PE stamped shop drawings showing material size and geometry for ladders.
Vol 2 ladders appear to be designed on plans. Is GC expected to provide calculations for Vol 2 ladders, or just have a PE review shop drawings for material size and geometry compliance? (Note: Vol 3, which has all aluminum ladders, are clearly noted on drawings they are to be designed by GC)
PE review and stamp of shop drawings for material size and compliance with OSHA and ANSI standards is acceptable.
203 5/12/2021 Vol 1 S‐101
Please clarify what repairs are expected at the existing slab of the Dockside Complex for the base bid versus CLIN 0005 ‐ Option 4. Is the slab to remain as‐is for the base bid and the repairs shown on sheet S‐502 and specified in 03 01 00 Rehabilitation of Concrete for Option 4?
There are no repairs to the existing slabs as part of the base bid. CLIN 0005 includes repairs per Vol. 1, spec.
03 10 00 and 09 90 00.
PREAWARD INQUIRY FORM (TEMPLATE)
Page Section Para.
Question No. QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received
Amend No.
204 5/12/2021 Amendme nt 006 CLIN 011 and 0012 were revised from 330 days to 180 days in Amendment 006, PPI 138 response. In the same Amendment the anticipated NTP day was changed from July 1 to September 1 decreasing the work window leading up to the dock fit up testing by 62 calendar days. Work and fabrication cannot commence until the coordination drawings per specification section 01 33 00 paragraph
1.16.1 are complete. These coordination drawings and delayed award do not allow enough time to complete the project within the timeframes specified in the Solicitation.
After updating and reviewing our anticipated construction schedule with these dates we cannot meet the April 2023 dock fit up testing or contract completion date. Please revise the CLIN's 011, 012 and 013 to a maximum of 60 calendar days to award from NTP.
CLINs 011, 012 & 013 cannot be reduced by 120 calendar days to a maximum of 60 calendar days to award from NTP as requested.
The government will provide 120 additional days between award of CLINs 011, 012, & 013 and the Dock Fit Up. Maximum duration between NTP and CLINs 011, 012, & 013 will be 120 days, providing 60 additional days. Dock Fit Up will be moved to June 1 2023 ‐ July 31 2023, providing an additional 60 days.
There is no further ability for the government to revise the award and Dock Fit Up schedules due to other Government schedule constraints.
205 5/12/2021 31 63 29 1.3.2.G & 3.3.1.A
Specification Section 31 63 29 Micropiles, 1.3.2.G and 3.3.1.A require verification test piles and proof test piles to be tested in compression. Every test will require sacrificial reaction piles if in compression, significantly increasing the cost of the work. Would tension tests be allowed instead of compression for all testing?
Piles may be tested in tension or compression.
PREAWARD INQUIRY FORM (TEMPLATE)
Page Section Para.
Question No. QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received
Amend No.
206 5/12/2021 31 63 29 3.4.1.1 Specification Section 31 63 29 Micropiles, 3.4.1.1 Drill Logs is requesting records for cores and soil classifications / exploratory boring related criteria. Can you confirm that a micropile log such as FHWA would be acceptable in lieu of the requirements stated?
If the information described in 3.4.1.1
(a) through (n) is provided, alternate formats are acceptable.
207 5/12/2021 31 63 29 3.4.1.1 Specification Section 31 63 29 Micropiles, 3.4.1.1 Pile Records states criteria typically required for rock anchors including extended creep tests & watertightness tests.
Please confirm that this paragraph does not apply to the micropiles.
Watertightness and creep tests are not required for micropiles.
208 5/12/2021 31 68 13 3.4.4 Specification Section 31 68 13 Rock Anchors, 3.4.4 Driller Logs is requesting records for cores and soil classifications / exploratory boring related criteria. Can you confirm that a rock anchor log such as FHWA would be acceptable in lieu of the requirements stated?
If the information described in 3.4.1.1
(a) through (n) is provided, alternate formats are acceptable.
| Amendment 0009 |
| Master PPI Log |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .