Amd 0002 Enclosure 1_PPI.pdf
PDF 78 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N4008425R0066
About this file
This document is a Pre-Bid/Proposal Inquiry (PPI) Form for Amendment 0002 related to a naval construction contract in Japan. The form contains three key inquiries from potential bidders and corresponding government responses: 1) Clarification on bid guarantee requirements, with the government confirming that bid guarantees are not required for the seed project but may be specified on individual Task Order RFPs, 2) A request for an estimated award date for construction scheduling purposes, with the government allowing contractors to make their own award date assumptions, and 3) A query about attendee limits for the pre-proposal conference and site visit, where the government specified conference room space is limited to 1-2 attendees for the pre-proposal conference but has no strict limit on site visit attendance.
Additional notable details include the government's provision of MS Word versions of Exhibit A and C forms as an attachment, and confirmation that contractors may exclude the Dun & Bradstreet report from proposal submissions due to sharing restrictions. The solicitation is for an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Multiple Award Construction Contract for the U.S. Naval Air Facility in Atsugi, Japan, with solicitation number N4008425R0066. The pre-proposal conference is scheduled for 25 March 2025 at 1000 Japan Standard Time, with a site visit immediately following at Building 89, NAVFAC Far East.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amend 0004.pdf | ||
| Amend 0004 Enclosure 1_PPI.pdf | ||
| Amd 0003 Enclosure 1_PPI.pdf | ||
| N4008425R0066-Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| Pre-proposal Conference Slides_25 Mar 2025 Fin.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| N4008425R0066 Amendment 0002_PPI Attachment 1 - EXHIBIT A.docx | DOCX document | |
| N4008425R0066 Amendment 0002_21MAR25.pdf | ||
| N4008425R0066 Amendment 0002_PPI Attachment 1 - EXHIBIT C.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amend 0001_Encl 1_Inquiry and Response.pdf | ||
| Amend 0001_SF30.pdf | ||
| 4_Site Visit Request List.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| EXHIBIT A thru D.pdf | ||
| N4008425R0066_SF1442.pdf | ||
| 1_Pre-Bid_Inquiry_Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CUI//FEDCON [when filled in] Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 3.104 [when filled]
Pre-Bid/Proposal Inquiry Form
Page Section Para.
8 15-Mar Amd 1 Encl 1
Amendment 1, Enclosure 1, Inquiries and government responses, Question 5 concerning Bid Guarantee, government replied that a Bid Guarantee is not
A bid guarantee is not required for the seed project. However, Bid Guarantees, if required, will be specified on each Task Order RFP.
Therefore, FAR provision 52.228-1 remains unchanged in the solicitation.
Refer to Section 00 10 00 paragraph 4 page 4, FAR 52.228-1 page 53, and Section 00 73 02 paragraph 1.e page 73.
9 19-Mar 31 of SF1442 00 22 16
(4) Factor 4 of Para. 2.4
We will prepare Construction Schedule with MS Project.
To take holidays into consideration, could you please indicate estimated Award Date (e.g. 15 May 2025)?
Contractors may make their own assumptions on the award date, or use the proposal validity timeframe from SF1442 block 13D if desired.
10 19-Mar
Is there a limit to the number of attendees at the preproposal conference and site visit?
Conference room space is limited. Please limit to 1 to 2 attendees for the preproposal conference. There is no limit to the site visit attendance. Those with current base access may meet directly at the building #89. Additionally, Contractors with current base access may submit names of attendees for the Government awareness.
REFERENCE
Question No.
QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
Date
Received Posted on Amend No.
Pre-Bid/Proposal Inquiry Form
Page Section Para.
Question No.
QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
Date
Received Posted on Amend No.
11 19-Mar 1 of EXHIBIT A and 1 of
EXHIBIT C
2nd. block of
EXHITIT A
and 3rd.
block of
EXHIBIT C
Could you provide MS Word version of EXHIBIT A & C so that individual blocks on these forms can be expanded?
EXHIBIT
A及びCのフォームの個々のブロックを拡張でき
るように、これらのフォームのMS
Word版を提供していただけないでしょうか。
Word documents A&C provided as attachment 1 to this PPI of Amd 0002.
19 of SF1442 00 21 16 d. ii., "RFP Documents" of 11.3 Proposal
Does the "documentation showing the firm's recent rating by Dun & Bradstreet" in item d. ii. mean the "D&B Report"? If so, may we exclude this documentation from the submissions in item d. ii.
because one of the "Frequently Asked Questions" of the website* of Tokyo Shoko Research, which holds the exclusive rights to sell the D&B Report in Japan, says "Q: To what extent can we share the report I have obtained? A: The report can only be used within the same company". *https://www.tsr-net.co.jp/faq/index.html (The web site is Japanese only.)
item d. ii.の「documentation showing the firm’s recent rating by Dun & Bradstreet」とは「ダンレポート」のことを指し
ているのでしょうか？もし、そうだとすると、
ダンレポートの日本国内独占販売権を保有して
いる東京商工リサーチのホームページ*の「よく
あるご質問」の１つに「Q:
入手したレポートはどの範囲まで共有してよい
のでしょうか？ A:
レポートは同一法人内でのご利用に限らせてい
ただいております。」とありますので、このdoc umentationをitem d.
ii.の提出物から除外しても宜しいでしょうか。
You may exclude the Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) report from your proposal.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .