EXHIBIT A thru D.pdf
PDF 320 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N4008425R0066
About this file
This file contains four exhibits (A-D) that are part of solicitation N4008425R0066 for a metal roof replacement project at Naval Air Facility Atsugi, Japan. Exhibit A is a Construction Experience Project Data Sheet template limited to three pages that requires detailed information about up to five previous construction projects, including contract numbers, award dates, completion dates, project descriptions, and performance details.
Exhibit B is a Past Performance Questionnaire that evaluates contractors on quality, schedule/timeliness, customer satisfaction, management/personnel/labor, cost/financial management, safety/security, and general performance using a rating scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory. Exhibit C requires a two-page Safety Narrative describing the offeror's Safety Management System approach, subcontractor selection and oversight processes. Exhibit D is a Price Proposal Form for CLIN 0001 Base Bid requiring a lump sum price in Yen for all labor, material, equipment, transportation, supervision and incidental work to replace the metal roof on Building 84 at NAF Atsugi.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amend 0004.pdf | ||
| Amend 0004 Enclosure 1_PPI.pdf | ||
| Amd 0003 Enclosure 1_PPI.pdf | ||
| N4008425R0066-Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| Pre-proposal Conference Slides_25 Mar 2025 Fin.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| N4008425R0066 Amendment 0002_PPI Attachment 1 - EXHIBIT A.docx | DOCX document | |
| N4008425R0066 Amendment 0002_21MAR25.pdf | ||
| Amd 0002 Enclosure 1_PPI.pdf | ||
| N4008425R0066 Amendment 0002_PPI Attachment 1 - EXHIBIT C.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amend 0001_Encl 1_Inquiry and Response.pdf | ||
| Amend 0001_SF30.pdf | ||
| 4_Site Visit Request List.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| N4008425R0066_SF1442.pdf | ||
| 1_Pre-Bid_Inquiry_Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EXHIBIT A
CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET
Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length shall not exceed three (3) pages.
Project No. (check one): CON #1 CON #2 CON #3 CON #4 CON #5
1. Name of Firm that Performed This Project*:
Address:
Phone Number: Unique Entity Identifier (UEI):
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
Name of Firm Experience is Claimed for*:
(i.e., if the project was performed by a JV and Offeror is claiming experience of one of the JV members, state the exact legal name of the JV member Offeror claims experience for) Address:
Phone Number: Unique Entity Identifier (UEI):
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
*If firm that experience is claimed for is not exactly as stated in Block 14 of the SF1442, explain in Block 9 below.
2. Work Performed as*: Prime Contractor Subcontractor Joint Venture Other (Explain):
Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Number: Delivery/Task Order Number:
Title:
Location:
4. Award Date (mm/dd/yy): Construction Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
5. Type of work:
New Construction Renovation Repair Alteration Other (Explain): ____________________________
Type of Infrastructure: ________________________________________
6. Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)
Firm-Fixed Price Cost/Time and Material Other (Explain):
7. Construction Project:
Contract Award Amount (Subcontract Amount [if work was performed as Subcontractor]):
¥ Final Price inclusive of any modifications: ¥
Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply) Design-Bid-Build Design-Build Delivery/Task Order (IDIQ) Other (explain): ____________________
If Design-Build, identify the Lead Design Firm: __________________________________________________________
CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET (cont’d)
8. Project Description and Relevancy: Provide a detailed description of the project and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, square footage, construction methods). If project is design-build, include a description of the design-effort. If the project was performed by a JV, and not all partners from that JV are on the JV proposed for this contract, clearly describe only the portion of the work that was performed by the JV member offering on this contract.
9. Meaningful Involvement: If the Offeror is utilizing experience information of ANY entity other than the Offeror (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), clearly state the specific commitments of resources (personnel, management) and the role of the entity in terms of the work it will specifically perform or manage in the performance of the contract at the worksite. The entity’s role described herein shall be relevant to the proposed role under this contract and meet the relevancy criteria under the solicitation.
EXHIBIT B
NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:
Address: Entity Identifier Number:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS.
CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON
THIS FORM.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.
Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
E VG S M U N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E VG S M U N
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
E VG S M U N
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
E VG S M U N
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;
responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
E VG S M U N
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E VG S M U N
d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N
c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
E VG S M U N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
E VG S M U N
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E VG S M U N
Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
E VG S M U N
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)
E VG S M U N
d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
Yes No
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes No
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
Yes No
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?
(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
E VG S M U N
7. GENERAL
a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
E VG S M U N
b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E VG S M U N
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
EXHIBIT C
FACTOR 3 - SAFETY NARRATIVE
Use this form to provide the Safety Narrative. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page. Additional pages will not be considered.
OFFEROR NAME:
1. Describe the Offeror’s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including 1)
Management/Leadership involvement, 2) Employee involvement, 3) Hazard prevention, 4) Hazard control, 5)
Worksite analysis, and 6) Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS:
2. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors:
3. Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror’s own employees):
4. Other relevant information:
EXHIBIT D
PRICE PROPOSAL FORM
PRICE PROPOSAL SCHEDULE
SOLICITATION N40084-25-R-0066
WON 1809571, B84 REPLACE METAL ROOF
NAVAL AIR FACILITY (NAF) ATSUGI, JAPAN
CLIN Description Quantity Unit Amount
0001 Base Bid 1 Total price for the entire work to provide all labor, material, equipment, transportation, supervision, and other incidental work required to perform WON 1809571, B84 Replace Metal Roof, NAF Atsugi, Japan.
LS
NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON SIGNATURE OF PERSON OFFER DATE
AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER AUTHORIZED TO SIGN
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .