18R0003_P3021_HANGAR_21_SF1442.pdf

ACQR4929810

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION P3021, DESIGN-BID-BUILD OF HANGAR 21, JOINT BASE ANDREWS, CAMP SPRINGS, MARYLAND

Competition Requirement: Full and Open Competition

Source Selection Process: Best Value Source Selection (BVSS) Trade-Off Using Tw o Phase Procedures.

North American Industry Classif ication System (NAICS) Code is 236220 w ith a size standard of $36.5M.

Contract Type: First Fixed Price.

In accordance w ith DFAR 236.204(i), the construction magnitude of this project is estimated betw een $100,000,000 to $250,000,000.

Draw ings and specif ications for this project w ill not be available in Phase I. They w ill be available in Phase II.

All amendments, draw ings, specif ications w ill be posted to Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) w ebsite: https://w w w .neco.navy.mil and Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) w ebsite: https://w w w .fbo.gov and potential offerors w ill not be contacted regarding any changes posted.

OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT FUNDING MAY NOT BECOME AVAILABLE. IF FUNDS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, NO AWARD WILL BE MADE AS A RESULT OF THIS SOLICITATION. OFFERORS WILL NOT BE REIMBURSED FOR ANY EFFORT OR PROPOSAL COSTS RESULTING FROM THIS

SOLICITATION.

TRAN TRANG 202-685-3114

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

04-Jan-2018

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________1095 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________5 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________05 Feb 2018 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND

1314 HARWOOD ST

WASHINGTON DC 20374

N40080

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N4008018R0003 58

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N4008018R0003

Section SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

PH I INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

PHASE I – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1. TITLE: MILITARY CONSTRUCTION P3021, DESIGN-BID-BUILD OF HANGAR 21, JOINT BASE

ANDREWS, CAMP SPRINGS, MARYLAND

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

This project consists of constructing a hangar complex which entails a two bay hangar, an aircraft access taxiway/parking apron, associated lighting, engine run-up pads and a hydrant refueling system with storage tanks. Additional requirements include, but are not limited to, site preparation, wetland/stream mitigation, storm water management, parking lot, landscaping, and fire detection and suppression system. Facilities shall be constructed to meet DoD, Air Force and base design standards.

The primary facility will be approximately 366,000 SF consisting of a 2-bay general maintenance hangar with roughly 60,000 SF of administration and roughly 70,000 SF of warehouse support areas.

The ancillary facilities will be approximately 14,000 SF with supporting functions such as security, type III hydrant fueling systems, fire suppression storage and materials storage. The primary construction site limit of disturbance is roughly 91 acres and will require a contractor secured fence line. There is approximately 10 additional acres to include utility routing, tree planting and disturbance at borrow pits. The utility tie in will include a new primary electrical feed, and communications lines, to be run in excess of a mile.

3. The facility will include security features indicative of operations on, and adjacent to, an active airfield.

Construction will need to comply with MDE and other regulations.

4. Contract Completion Date: All work shall be completed within 1,095 calendar days after contract award.

5. The Offeror’s price is valid for 120 days from the receipt of proposals.

6. PRIMARY POINT OF CONTACT: The primary point of contact for this procurement is Trang Tran at Trang.T.Tran@Navy.mil.

7. SECONDARY POINT OF CONTACT: Lindsay Brown at Lindsay.Naill@Navy.mil.

8. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)

CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO REVIEW THE ENTIRE SOLICITATION PACKAGE

BEFORE SUBMITTING QUESTIONS.

ALL INQUIRIES MUST BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN JANUARY 19, 2018 BY 2:00

PM EST. All inquiries must be submitted in writing and emailed to Trang Tran at Trang.T.Tran@Navy.mil and Lindsay Brown at Lindsay.Naill@Navy.mil with inquiries attached as a WORD document. No tables please.

9. DELIVERY OF PROPOSAL

The proposals and all copies shall be sent via FedEx or hand-delivery to the address and POC as shown below:

NAVFAC Washington Attn: Trang Tran

1314 Harwood Street SE, Bldg. 212, First Floor Mail Room Washington Navy Yard Washington, DC 20374

Proposals must be received no later than 05 FEBRUARY 2018 AT 2:0 PM EST.

If hand-delivering, please see Instructions for Hand Delivery of Proposals below.

Facsimile copies or email copies will NOT be accepted.

Please allow SUFFICIENT TIME for your proposal to be received prior to the proposed closing date/time. Technical and Price proposals shall be submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes marked in the bottom right corner “Solicitation N40080-18-R-0003, DO NOT OPEN”

All proposals must be received prior to the due date and time. Any proposals submitted after the time set for receipt will be stamped with the date and hour of receipt and held unopened until after award.

The file shall be documented in accordance with FAR 15.208 (h).

INSTRUCTIONS FOR HAND DELIVERY OF PROPOSALS:

The current security condition at the Washington Navy Yard requires escorts for entry to the base by individuals not possessing a U.S. Government DoD Common Access Card (CAC) identification card.

Individuals without a DoDCAC will not be permitted to enter the Navy Yard. NAVFAC Washington WILL NOT be able to provide escorts for Navy Yard entry of hand delivered proposals. NAVFAC Washington WILL NOT receive hand delivered proposals at the Base Pass Office or any location other than that identified for receipt in the solicitation.

The Government considers use of a courier service, such as FedEx or UPS, as hand delivery of proposals and the responsibility for timely delivery resides with the offeror.

Offerors are notified that the entry point for proposals submitted through the U.S. Postal Service is at Joint Base Anacosta-Bolling and NOT at the Washington Navy Yard. Contractors proposals must be received by NAVFAC Washington at the Navy Yard by the due date outlines in the solicitation and delivery time from the Joint Base Anacosta-Bolling to the Navy Yard cannot be predicted nor guaranteed. Offerors should take this into consideration when determining delivery method.

10. PROPOSAL ORGANIZATION AND FORMAT:

a. The proposal submitted in response to this solicitation shall be clear, concise, and shall contain sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposals should not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather should demonstrate convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the RFP. Nonconformance with the solicitation requirements, specified organization and content may result in elimination or misevaluation of the proposal. All claimed technical capabilities to meet the requirements shall be realistic and are subject to verification by the Government. Offerors should assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of the offeror’s business and that the Government will base its evaluation on the information contained in the offeror’s proposals.

b. Phase I Proposal Organization and Number of Copies.

Offeror shall submit one (1) original and five (5) copies, each in a separate three-ring binder and tabbed appropriately by evaluation factor with the following characteristics:

o Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format, minimum 10 point font.

o A cover page with Contract Number, Contract Title, Prime Contractor’s Name, Address, Phone Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, phone and email address.

o Firm’s type of business and business size, including information on the categories or small business for which the firm qualifies (i.e, Large Business, SB SDB, HUGZONE SB, WOSB/EDWOSB, VOSB, and/or SDVOSB).

o A complete electronic copy of the technical proposal as a single .pdf file on a CD-ROM (include with the Original non-price submission).

The proposal shall be written to the greatest extent possible on a stand-alone basis so that its content may be evaluated with a minimum of cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal.

Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity. Hyperlinking of cross-references is permissible. Information required for proposal evaluation, but not provided in its designated volume or cross-referenced, is assumed omitted from the proposal.

BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, cost/price and other factors considered.

2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions.

Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

5. Award of the contract shall be based on the Offeror whose proposal provides the best value to the Government considering all stated criteria. This procurement will be conducted in two phases. The overall best value evaluation is based on combining the technical evaluation ratings of Phases I and II, (Factors 1 through 6) and price.

OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT AN AWARD MAY BE MADE WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS.

Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms. Offerors should not assume that they will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to qualify, discuss or revise their proposals prior to award.

Information received under Phase I of the procurement will be evaluated to determine whether the Offeror possesses the experience and capability required to successfully perform the requirements of the solicitation.

Following the evaluation of Phase I submissions, the Contracting Officer may determine the number of offers that might otherwise be included in the competition exceeds the number by which an efficient competition can be conducted. Potential Offerors are hereby notified that the maximum number of Offerors invited to participate in Phase II is five (5). However, the Government reserves the right to change this number if the Contracting Officer determines it to be in the best interest of the Government.

It is the Government’s intent that the potential Offerors who are invited to participate in Phase II, shall be invited by the Government solely on the evaluation of their responses to the Phase I factors WITHOUT discussions.

Phase II information will only be submitted by those Offerors considered by the Government to be the most highly qualified under Phase I. Phase II submissions shall include responses to Factor 5, Factor 6, and Price.

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

The distinction between experience and past performance is experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

Non-Cost/Price Evaluation Factors:

PHASE I:

Factor 1 – Management Approach Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

PHASE II:

Factor 5 – Schedule & Execution Approach Factor 6 – Small Business Utilization

PRICE

This is a two-phase procurement. Factors 1-4 will be evaluated in Phase I and Factors 5-6 and Price will be evaluated in Phase II. In making the best value award decision after Phase II, the Government will consider Factors 1-6 and price. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6) are equal in importance to each other and when combined, are equal in importance to Factor 4 – Past Performance. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance factor combined are approximately equal in importance to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor

NONE-COST/PRICE FACTORS

PHASE I:

FACTOR 1 –MANAGEMENT APPROACH:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed construction team (prime and subcontractors) for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firm(s) and subcontractor firms that the offeror will use in performing this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities, and the Offeror's management approach to achieve secure construction site perimeters and comply with requirements of Intelligence Community Directive #705 (ICD 705). If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

(2) In addition to the narrative, the Offeror shall submit, where applicable, a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, or approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA) for each member of the Offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.).

The management approach narrative shall be limited to one and one half (1.5) double-sided pages or three (3) single-sided pages, 8 ½” x 11”, including the organizational chart. The information requested in item #2 above in this Factor is not included in this page limitation.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s management approach to assess whether the Offeror’s proposed organizational structure, teaming relationships and qualifications demonstrate the Offeror’s likelihood of successfully managing this project.

FACTOR 2 – EXPERIENCE:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

Submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this

RFP.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size: 75,000 square feet or larger and/or $50,000,000

Scope: New construction of a high bay aircraft hangar, AND/OR new construction of administrative facilities (e.g. offices, conference rooms, warehouse, food services), AND/OR new construction of Petroleum, Oils and Lubricants (POL) fueling facilities comparable to Department of Defense (DoD) standard Type III Hydrant Refueling System.

Complexity: New construction of one of the facilities indicated in Scope above, inclusive of one or more of the following;

o Aircraft hangar with multiple high-bay structures with clear spans of 180 feet or greater.

o Airfield paving of 500,000 square feet or greater.

o Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) fire protection system or high expansion foam.

o Requiring execution of airfield paving while working near an adjacent active runway.

o United States Government certified secure facilities that meet the Intelligence

Community Directive #705 (ICD 705).

Relevance may be strengthened by possessing:

1. Experience with new construction projects with comparable size, scope and complexity which required contingency planning due to unscheduled limited site access and/or work stoppage due to airfield operations.

2. Experience with construction projects where document security requirements required the Contractor to provide proof confirming approved registration with the United Sates / Canada Joint Certification Program (JCP) for prime contractor and all subcontractors.

3. Experience with construction projects where the Contractor, Subcontractors and Suppliers were required to provide an approved Form DD 2345, Militarily Critical Technical Data Agreement.

4. Experience with new construction projects where the Contractor was required to provide a secure construction zone and all construction personnel are required to be US persons (individuals lawfully admitted for permanent residence as defined in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20) or protected individuals as defined in 8 U.S.C. 1324b(a)(3)).

5. Experience with new construction projects requiring phased grading in accordance with the requirements of the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE).

6. Experience with projects that contain multiple size, scope and complexity characteristics as indicated in this factor.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1.5) double-sided pages or three (3) single-sided pages, 8 ½” x 11”, inclusive of photographs.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods).

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower. The JV agreement shall demonstrate the relationship between firms, the percentage of work that each firm will complete, and the type of work each firm will perform. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined for Factor 2.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

Experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s aggregate experience will be used as a means of evaluating the relevancy of the submitted experience and the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience will not be considered.

FACTOR 3 – SAFETY

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Include three previous complete calendar years’ (2015, 2016, and 2017) worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums.

The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate: Submit three previous complete calendar years’ (2015, 2016, and 2017) worth of data. If an offeror cannot submit an OSHA DART and TRC rates, for any year, affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA, DART, and TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety: Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work. The offeror will describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels. Additionally, the contactor will describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two pages, 8 ½” x 11”.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

Experience Modification Rate (EMR) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case

(TRC) Rates Offeror Technical Approach to Safety Other sources of information available to the Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): For the three previous complete calendar years the offeror will submit EMR. If no EMR exists, the offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate explaining why not. If an insurance company-provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of this selection factor. The board will evaluate the EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates: For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their OSHA DART and TRC, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA DART and TRC rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA DART and TRC rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety: The offeror will describe their plan to evaluate their safety performance and that of potential subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. Those Offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(4) Other Sources of Information Available to the Government: Other sources for safety may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.

FACTOR 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE

PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 2, Experience. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ

WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment D), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Trang Tran, via email at Trang.T.Tran@Navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

A copy of the blank Past Performance Questionnaire to be used for requesting client references is included as Attachment D.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. For purposes of the past performance evaluation, a relevant project is defined as construction project with a value of $20M or greater.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating.

Past performance ratings of “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” hold more value than a “Neutral Confidence” rating and will be considered more favorably in the evaluation of past performance.

PHASE II:

PRICE

Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

The price proposals shall be submitted in Phase II along with Phase II technical proposals. The Offeror shall submit (1) original, marked “Original”, and (1) copy, marked “copy”, in a separate three ring binder with the following:

Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format, minimum 10 point font.

Completed SF 1442 signed with all amendments acknowledged.

Price Schedule.

Proposed Modification/Change order Percentage rates.

Copy of Online Representation and Certifications and proof of registration in System for Award

Management (SAM) Confirmation of filing of Veterans' Employment and Training (VETS) VETS 4212 and/or VETS report for the cycle.

Bid Guarantee in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee. Amount shall be at least 20 percent of the bid price but shall not exceed $3 million.

Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone

Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, phone number, and email address.

Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR Part 52.219-9 - Small Business Subcontracting Plan. **See

Instructions for submitting Subcontracting Plan.

A complete electronic copy of the price proposal as a single .pdf file on a CD-ROM.

**If you are a Large Business, submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan for this project in the format provided in Attachment D for this factor, to include all information required in the attachment. If you are a Small Business, submit a subcontracting participation breakdown in the format provided in Attachment E for this factor. All proposers: To demonstrate commitment in using small business concerns, the Small Business Subcontracting Plan or subcontracting participation breakdown may list all subcontractors by name. If the proposed Small Business Subcontracting goals do not meet the minimum NAVFAC Small Business Subcontracting Targets, include a detailed explanation describing the actions taken to arrive at that determination, along with an explanation for the goals that actually were proposed. For proposals submitted on design-build solicitations, the proposer must identify its designer/design team in its Subcontracting Plan or Small Business Participation Breakdown.

Offerors shall submit their Price proposal in accordance with the solicitation requirements. Offerors shall submit the Price Schedule (section 00100 – Solicitation Contract Form) for submission of their price with all the line items (CLINS) completed.

Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements, and all option items. The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section 00100 of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

a. Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

b. Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

c. Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

d. Comparison of market survey results.

FACTOR 5 – SCHEDULE & EXECUTION APPROACH:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(1) Summary Schedule

Submit a CPM schedule from contract award through construction completion for the Base Bid, and all possible option(s). The summary schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved. All days should be “calendar days”. In the schedule the offeror shall provide no more than 100 items of critical path activities, milestones, durations, and other important activities for these items. Schedule should illustrate logical and sequential construction activities in accordance with the Offeror’s plan of execution.

Offeror must demonstrate the capability and flexibility to plan and schedule the complete project to meet the proposed contract completion period. Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented (e.g., labor or material availability, permits, weather, etc.). Indicate the anticipated overall critical path on the schedule.

For schedule proposal purposes only, utilize a Notice to Proceed date of 30 September 2018. This date is solely to assist in evaluation of offeror’s proposals and shall not be construed as a contractual NTP date. The resultant contract completion date for the construction shall not be more than 1095 calendar days after notification to proceed.

Schedules shall be graphically represented. The proposed project schedule shall reflect the proposed contract duration.

The summary schedule must identify and illustrate the following items;

(a) The overall construction duration for the facility, for the site work, and for the utilities

(b) Administrative pre-construction activities including but not limited to site activation, mobilization and equipment procurement

(c) Government and non-Government (i.e. privatized utilities) inspections and approvals

(d) Commissioning, acceptance testing and Red Zone activities

(e) Weather days, per the NOAA provisions

(f) Identify long lead and delegated design submittals

(g) Turnover of the facility. Identify any proposed phased turnovers. The time to complete the facility and turnover to the Government must consider the requirement for the Contractor’s CQC completion inspection and the subsequent joint Contractor-Government turnover inspections.

(2) Execution Approach

Submit a narrative, explicitly for this project’s requirements, explaining the offeror’s execution approach in support of their summary schedule to meet or exceed all contract requirements. Limit narrative information to one (1) double-sided page or two (2) single-sided pages, 8 ½” x 11”. The execution approach must address the following items:

(a) Provide the proposed contract duration.

(b) Describe the interaction the construction team intends to have with NAVFAC Washington’s ROICC Andrews construction team during construction, including the coordination and cooperation that will take place to ensure improvements within and across (i.e. Taxiway Whiskey tie in) project limits are seamlessly integrated in a smooth, efficient, cost effective manner. List those features (i.e., utilities, site access (including haul routes), roads, phased grading, communications infrastructure, etc.) the construction team identifies to warrant special emphasis to produce a well-coordinated hangar complex adjacent to an active runway.

(c) Describe the execution approach to construction activities, specifically how these activities will be scheduled and coordinated with the installation to avoid any impacts to the adjacent active airfield, and other affected base functions, while ensuring that the new facilities are successfully constructed on schedule. Consider how the access roads, lay-down area, utilities, POV parking, and on site production facilities, will be coordinated.

(d) Describe how site preparation, construction of foundations, walls, roof, steel erection, interior areas, parking, electrical, mechanical, fire protection, airfield paving, fuel storage and other features of the complex will be logically executed to support a realistic construction schedule.

(e) Describe the procedures to implement the utility outage plan. Consider all utilities being disconnected or disrupted in any way during the construction period; e.g. steam, condensate, potable water, fire protection water, electrical power, and communications. Describe measures to mitigate the outages with the constraints described in the RFP. As needed, include measures to provide temporary utility to any existing facilities requiring temporary utility services.

(f) Describe site security management approach including but not limited to; site security manager’s duties, approach used for managing access to the project site, methods that will be used for the management of drawings, specifications and other documentation, preventative measures to be taken if a security breach should occur.

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed schedule and approach for, comprehension (meaning clear representation of primary construction activities), logic (meaning the order in which construction activities, based on the plans and specifications, should occur) and realism (meaning realistic / achievable durations). A logical, realistic schedule with an accompanying execution approach that indicates completion in the shortest duration which do not exceed the contract completion period noted above may be viewed as more favorable.

(1) Summary Schedule

In assessing the reasonableness of the proposed contract duration, the Government may take into account how well the proposed summary schedule supports the proposed duration. The Government will rate a proposed contract duration matching the maximum allowed contract duration as “Acceptable.” A proposed contract duration shorter than the maximum allowed duration may potentially receive a higher rating, provided it is realistic and its logic is deemed to be achievable. The Government will consider an unreasonably condensed contract duration, which places additional cost or schedule risk on the Government or which may create a risk of contract or performance failure, as a significant weakness depending upon the evaluators' judgment. Contract durations of at least 30 calendar days less than the maximum allowed duration stated in FAR Clause 52.211-10, may be considered an advantage. No advantage will be considered between proposals for differences less than 30 calendar days.

(2) Execution Approach

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s execution approach to assess the Offeror’s understanding of the project requirements (i.e. scope & restrictions) which are necessary to successfully execute the proposed summary schedule.

The Government will evaluate the Offeror's logic to execute the complete project within the proposed contract duration.

FACTOR 6 - SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION:

This Factor assesses both the historical achievements in utilizing small business concerns as subcontractors and proposed small business participation and commitment strategies.

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(1) Achievements: All offerors shall provide a narrative (limited to two pages) to describe their achievements in supporting the Government’s policy to provide maximum practicable opportunities for small business (SB), veteran-owned small business (VOSB), service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB), historically underutilized business zone (HUBZone) small business, small disadvantaged business (SDB), and women-owned small business (WOSB) concerns to participate as subcontractors consistent with efficient contract performance.

In support of narrative submissions:

(a) All offerors shall submit small business subcontracting information associated with each project cited under the Experience Factor in the format provided in Attachment G, Small Business Subcontracting Record.

(b) Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall also provide copies of the most current individual subcontracting reports (ISRs) associated with each project cited under the Experience Factor if a small business subcontracting plan was required by the contract. If such projects were completed under specific task orders, provide ISRs for the overall contract. For cited projects with state and local government agencies, provide similar subcontracting performance reports if required by the contracts.

When not specifically addressed in the ISR or similar report, offerors shall provide explanations for all instances of failures to meet dollar or percentage goals in individual subcontracting plans.

Notes:

The Government reserves the right to consider achievements information on other recent, relevant projects from all available sources.

Offerors utilizing achievements information of team members or key subcontractors shall clearly demonstrate how these companies will have meaningful involvement in the management of the subcontracting program for this acquisition. If not, such achievement information will not be considered under this factor. If the offeror is a new joint venture, partnership or other entity consisting of more than one company, provide achievements information for each individual business entity(ies) that will be responsible for managing the subcontracting program and clearly describe those responsibilities.

Failure to provide ISRs or any other requested information must be fully explained and may negatively impact your evaluation.

(2) Small Business Participation and Commitment: All offerors shall submit a small business participation and commitment strategy including all data elements shown in Attachment H, Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy.

(a) Identify in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total acquisition the extent of work the offeror will self-perform as the prime contractor. If submitting an offer as a joint venture, identify the percentage of work each member will be responsible for and indicate the size status of each member (e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, other than small business).

(b) Include supplemental narratives (limited to five pages) to address other elements of the offeror’s strategy such as binding agreements covering post award roles for execution of the contract and specific initiatives and tools that will be employed under the contract to enhance small businesses opportunities to both participate in this acquisition and build capabilities to support future NAVFAC acquisitions.

(c) The anticipated prime and first tier overall small business participation rate for this acquisition (i.e. work to be performed by small businesses as the prime and/or subcontractors) is 20% of the contract value.

Offerors are encouraged to exceed this percentage and seek meaningful levels of participation in each of the small business socioeconomic programs listed in Attachment E consistent with efficient contract performance. Offerors shall explain in their participation and commitment strategies how proposed participation rates were established. The small business participation and commitment strategy must be in agreement with any required small business subcontracting plan and will be made a part of the contract upon award.

Offerors will be evaluated on the extent to which their proposals and other performance information available to the Government demonstrate a history of successfully supporting Government policies concerning…