N39430-20-R-2201_0005.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1)Change the due date for receipt Phase I proposals to 18 Feb 2020 by 4:00pm PST.

2)Provide responses to the Pre-Proposal inquiries.

3)Make administrative changes to the RFP.

4)Make changes to Part 6 Attachments of the Basic PWS.

5)Attachment H- Part 2 Rev 1 6)Attachment H- Part 3 Rev1 7)Attachment H- Part 6 Rev1.

8)Publish the slides that w ere presented during the proposal conference.

9)Publish the sign-in list for the pre-proposal conference/site visit.

10)Publish the pre-proposal/site visit pictures for the seed task order.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 48

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 28-Jan-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N3943020R2201

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

19-Dec-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

28-Jan-2020

CODE

NAVFAC EXWC

CODE ACQ / NAVAL BASE VENTURA COUNTY

1100 23RD AVE BLDG 1100

PORT HUENEME CA 93043-4301

N39430 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N3943020R2201

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1) The due date for Phase I proposals has changed to 18 Feb 2020 by 4:00pm PST.

2) Responses to the Pre-Proposal inquiries are provided as follows:

No. Reference Question Gov. Response

1 RFP Section 4.5 Pg 11 Factor 3‐ Past Performance

CPARS are often considered company sensitive information. Will the Government allow a subcontractor to submit CPARS directly to the Government?

Yes, or have subcontractor provide in a sealed envelope.

2 RFP Section 4. Inquiries Pg 3 What time is phase one due on January 17, 2020? Phase I proposals are due at 4:00 PM (PST) on 17 Feb 2020.

3 RFP 6. Key Personnel Responsibilities and Requirements pg 75 para.

Project Management

1. Will the Government confirm if the offeror should provide a signed letter of intent (LOI) for any proposed key personnel who are not currently employed by the offeror for this opportunity? If so, under which tab should the offeror provide the LOI within our submission?

2. Will the Government accept an Electrical Engineering degree from an accredited program for the Project Engineer?

1. Yes, LOI's must be submitted for employees that are not currently employed by the prime. Include after the summary resume in Factor 1.

2. The requirements are as stated in paragraph 6.

4 RFP 6. Key Personnel Responsibilities and Requirements pg 75 para.

Project Management

During a draft pre‐solicitation in 2018, the Government requested input/questions from contractors. Specifically, question 12 on the list of questions asked:_“For those core personnel requiring the course “Construction Quality Management (CQM) for Contractors,” must it be completed prior to Phase Two proposal submission? Or will the requirement be enforced after during the bidding and execution of the task orders?”__In the Government’s response to questions in an email from Mr. Hepler on 12/11/2018, the following response was provided to question 12:_“ The QCM course completion would be validated post‐award.”_ Does the response to this question still apply?

3. Offeror's will not be assessed negatively if the CQM course is not completed. The requirement will be validated post‐award.

5 Will each job site provide as built drawings for task order bidding?

To the extent they exist.

6 Who will review design drawings and submittals? NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore PEC/SEIPT and NAVFAC Regional

FEC/PWD/FEAD.

7 What is the review schedule of the submitted drawings and submittals?

Refer to the Basic Contract Part 1, Section 00 72 00, 5.2.3.3, and Task Order Part 2, Section 01 33 00.05 20, 1.7, 1.7.a, 1.7.b., 1.7.c., 1.7.c.2. and Section 01 33 10.05 20, 1.3, 1.3.j., 1.5., 1.5.a., 1.5.b., 1.5.b.1., 1.5.b.1.a., 1.5.b.1.b., 1.5.b.2., 1.5.b.3., 1.6, 1.6.a., 1.6.b., 1.6.c., 1.6.c.2 The Contractor prepares and submits the IDP – 35% Design drawings, the IDP – 100% Pre‐Final Design drawings, and the IDP – 100% Final Design (For Construction) drawings for review and approval in accordance with the Basic Contract Part 1, Task Order Part 2, CDRL Review Process, DED A005 Installation Design Plan and Appendix D Data Requirements Checklist and DED Package. The initial Government review will be completed within fifteen (15) Government working days. The Contractor incorporates comments and resubmits the applicable IDP Design drawings within 10 Government working days of receipt of the Government's comments. Contractor works with the assigned NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore PEC to resolve any issues with respect to comments within 5 Government working days after the Contractor resubmits the corrected applicable

IDP Design drawings for final approval. The Contractor presents the design at a Preliminary Design Review (PDR) in support of the IDP – 35% Design drawings and at a Critical Design Review (CDR) in support of the IDP – 100% Pre‐Final Design drawings. The Contractor notifies the NAVFAC FEC when the design is ready for review. The FEC will coordinate the schedule and conduct of the review. Contractor provides design submittal package 21 calendar days prior to the in‐progress review meeting.

8 If design drawings & submittals require revision and re‐transmittal what is the review schedule

See the response for RFI #7.

9 Can the GC bill for materials requiring “deposit to order”?

No, that would be considered contract financing.

10 Can the GC bill for manufactured and stored materials?

Subject to the restrictions listed in Attachment H (or any task order) Part 2, Section 01 20 00.05 20 para 1.2 b. 2.

11 Will each job site allow for the GC’s temp office and storage to be located or will it be off site?

Contractor can assume lay down area will be provided to support temporary office and local storage. Any exceptions will be provided in the PWS.

12 Will the Gov. have a pre‐bid site visit for all task orders?

Yes.

13 What is the allowable working schedule, days & hours?

See individual Task Order Part 2, section 01 14 00.05 20 para 1.2 d (0700 ‐ 1530) Monday through Friday for attachment H.

14 Proposal 00 21 16 Paragraph: 4

What is the Geographic coverage of this contract? All Navy Bases worldwide. It is anticipated that the majority of task orders will be CONUS.

15 Proposal 00 21 16 Paragraph: 4

Is there a templet for resumes? What is the key information required for resumes?

There is no template.

The information should minimally address the applicable personnel qualifications stated in section 00 72 00 at Para 6 (beginning on page 74)

16 Proposal 00 21 16 Paragraph: 4

Attachment B Experience Data Sheet for Construction and Designers have spaces for 5 project numbers, are we to submit 5 projects for construction and 5 for the designer? Or is it a total of 5 projects for construction and designer combined?

The attachment B's are limited to five (5) total, regardless of whether submitted for Construction or Designers.

17 Proposal 00 21 16 Paragraph: 4

We are considering having two designers to address the geographic coverage and wide variety of designs required, how will that be evaluated? Do we need to submit projects from both?

There is no criteria for evaluating multiple design firms. It is the offeror's choice on what projects to submit, but note if the offeror has worked with the designer(s) previously that can be noted on the Offeror experience data sheet.

18 Proposal 00 21 16 Paragraph: 4

Is funding available for the Seed Project? Is it annual funding?

Appropriate funding will be available for awarded task orders and the associated period of performance.

19 Proposal 00 21 16 Paragraph: 4

Will there be a second site walk when the Phase II down selection is made so other subcontractors can attend?

No. See the explanation in section 00 11 19, para

6.5 (page 5).

20 6. KEY PERSONNEL

RESPONSIBILITIES AND

REQUIREMENTS Paragraph:

Program Manager pg.75

Will the Government accept an Industrial Engineering degree from an accredited program for the Program Manager?

The requirements for the Program Manager shall remain as currently stated in the RFP.

21 Section 00 72 00 para 6 pg 75 of 85

The credentials for the Program Manager include a minimum of an earned Bachelor of Science degree in one of 4 specific disciplines. Will the Government also accept a Bachelor of Science degree in Systems Engineering form a properly accredited University as well? That degree would seem to be directly applicable to the work contemplated under this contract.

The requirements for the Program Manager shall remain as currently stated in the RFP.

22 Section 00 21 16 para 4.4(a)1 pg 9 of 85

If the offeror was the prime contractor and the designer of record for a design‐built contract, shall both an Offeror Experience Project Data Sheet and a Designer Experience Project Data Sheet be submitted for that project, or just an Offeror Experience Data Sheet? If both should be submitted, please confirm that all 4 pages of information will be considered for that project without exceeding page count limitations.

Submit just the Offeror Experience Project Data Sheet.

23 section 00 11 19 para 5.3 pg

The solicitation appears to state a preference or requirement for printing all proposal information using both sides of each page. Please confirm that even when submitting the forms provided as attachments to the solicitation the Government prefers double sided printing whenever possible.

Double sided printing is preferred to the extent practical.

24 Section 00 21 16 para 4.3(c)4 and 4.4(a) pg 10 of 85

The first referenced passage appears to indicate that a teaming agreement or a letter of commitment should be submitted for each team member/ subcontractor. The second referenced passage appears to specifically require a letter of commitment from any subcontractor whose experience is presented under the Experience section of the proposal. Shall the Offeror submit both a teaming agreement and a letter of commitment for any subcontractor team member whose experience will be presented in that section?

If the teaming agreement/letter of commitment is submitted for Factor 1, it need not be included in Factor 2's submission.

25 Section 5 Proposal Submittal Requirements Paragraph:

Section 5.1‐5.1.6.3 pg3

Will the Government allow all sections within 5.1 to be included within one binder, given one original binder and 3 copy binders are provided enclosing all items within the section?

This question is not clear.

26 Pg 72/73 para 6 Under Para 6, pg. 72 and 73 that Program Manager and Project Managers must be employees of the prime. Will the government consider Letters of Intent by potential employees or must we show the candidates for the positions as current employees?

Letters of intent are acceptable.

27 Section 00 21 16 Instructions to Proposers Parag. 4.4 Factor 2‐ Experience PG. 10

This section tells offerors to submit no more than five

(5) projects performed by the offeror and/or the offerors Lead Design Firm, and/or major subcontractors. For clarification, does this mean that the TOTAL of five (5) can be a MIX of projects from the offeror, the design firm, and major subcontractors?

It is a limit of five (5) total and can be a mix of the offeror, designer, and major subcontractors.

28 RFP Para 5.3 pg 4, 4.1 pg 7‐ and definition 1.8 pg 9

Under 4.1 it states: Attachment A shall be limited to two (2) double‐sided pages or four (4) single‐sided pages, but under paragraph 5.3 of the proposal submittal requirements it states: "Proposals shall be submitted on 8.5" x 11" paper unless otherwise stipulated, utilizing both sides of the paper" Under

1.8 definitions, it defines a page as one‐sided printing. Please clarify if one‐sided printing is acceptable.

Double sided printing is preferred to the extent practical.

29 RFP Para 4.2(a) 7 pg. 10 It states "If an offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates (name is not exactly as stated on the SF 1442), the proposal shall demonstrate how the affiliate will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract. Will the government consider adding page count and a section for a meaningful involvement discussion?

No. The Page count remains unchanged.

30 Section 00 21 16 Para. 4.4(a) Pg. 10 of 85

Work completed under the successful AT/FP Ashore PS/AC Gates Technology Refreshment Projects Program would appear to be highly relevant to the experienced desired of an Offeror for this program, but the Government's current requirement that only experience on projects completed within 5 years of the issue date of this RFP excludes all experience gained under that program. Will the Government specifically allow project experience under the AT/FP Ashore PS/AC Gates Technology Refreshment Projects Program to be considered even though that program was completed more than 5 years before the issue date of this RFP?

No.

31 Section 4.5 Factor 3‐ Past Performance Para. (1) Past Performance Evaluation Forms Pg. 11

Are we allowed to submit previously submitted (NAVFAC/USACE PPQ‐0) forms?

Yes.

32 Replacing wedge barriers 1.Drainage was not established onsite. If no drainage is available, it is recommended to include other methods of water mitigation including a secondary sump pump and submersion system.

2.Operator controls are not specified and assumed not provided under this contract. Will the existing controls in the guard booth be used for the new wedge barriers? If so, the current contract will only need to provide dry contact open/close/status from the new wedge barriers.

3.Traffic lights were built into the existing barrier/s.

Will new traffic lights be required?

4.Traffic gate arm was built into the existing barrier/s.

Will new traffic arm be required?

5.Will it be acceptable to place the BCP and Battery Backup to the right of the entry barrier between the existing barriers and the pull box?

6.Please verify that the new wedge barriers need to be Department of State K12/L3 “or” ASTM M50/P1.

In the Statement of Work document, section E1030‐ Vehicular Equipment states “K12/L3 AND (&) ASTM M50/P1”. This statement should say “or” instead of “and”.

7.Per the statement of work document, section E1030‐Vehiclular Equipment, do the new wedge barriers need to be “as tested” widths as shown on the DoD Anti‐Ram Vehicle Barriers list?

1. The current barrier uses gravity via the curbs. That is still the preferred method for long‐term reliability.

The method described would be an acceptable secondary solution.

2. The new solution will accept a N.O. contact closure for the opening and closing of the barrier. The barrier solution shall also provide a N.O. contact closure when the barrier is in the full open and full closed state and the motor has been de‐ energized.

3. Yes, new traffic signals will be required to be installed on the drivers left side of the barrier.

4. No.

5. That would be a site‐ specific decision using

8.Will the new wedge barriers need to be integrated into the existing entrance slide gates sequence of operation?

best engineering practices. As long as the hardware does not affect the function of the ACP, nor the Sentries line of sight it is acceptable.

6. Concur.

7. No, the width needs to be designed to the actual needs of the site.

The width may vary from location to location.

8. Yes.

33 00 11 19 Para 4. Inquiries

Since the site visit for the seed project was held during Phase I, will the Government provide additional instructions for submitting RFIs regarding the Phase II factors?

Yes. Phase II invitations will contain a timeframe for additional RFIs.

34 00 72 00 Paragraph: 6. Key Personnel Responsibilities and Requirements Page 75 of

Project Engineer requires: “The project engineer’s specific experience must match the technical content of the task order […] The credentials for Project Engineer are: ‐ Minimum of earned Bachelors of Science degree in Electronics Engineering required, Graduate degree in engineering field preferred. ‐ Professional Engineering License required. DOD Acquisition Community certification (DAWIA or commercial equivalent) in facilities engineering preferred. ‐ Minimum 7 years professional level experience in systems engineering, industrial design or related field required. Minimum of 3 years’ experience in DOD 5000 systems acquisition, RDT&E, operational test and evaluation required.” This is an extraordinarily high standard to find in one person.

Our experience is that at different time the technical content of the task order is sometimes geared to a civil engineer (PE), sometimes to an electrical engineer (PE), and sometimes to a Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD). And we do not understand the relevancy of this Project Engineer needing to be a design and/or construction professional AND a contracting professional.

Will the Government consider changing this requirement to something like: “Each team shall have a Project Engineer, or multiple personnel, as a permanent employee of either the design firm or the construction firm that meet the following requirements:

1. ‐ All must have a minimum of earned Bachelors of Science degree in Civil, Electrical, Electronics Engineering, or a related filed, required; Graduate

The requirements for the Program Manager shall remain as currently stated in the RFP.

degree in engineering field preferred.

2. ‐ All must have a Professional Registration – either a PE or RCDD.

3. ‐ [Delete the requirement of: DOD Acquisition Community certification (DAWIA or commercial equivalent) in facilities engineering preferred.]

4. ‐ Minimum 7 years professional level experience in engineering, design or related field required.

5. ‐ [Delete the requirement of: Minimum of 3 years’ experience in DOD 5000 systems acquisition, RDT&E, operational test and evaluation required.]”?

35 Form 1442 Section 13 Pg.

Cover Page

Currently the SF1442 states that the due date is 4pm on 17 Feb 2020. 17 Feb 2020 is a Federal Holiday, Presidents Day. Please clarify if the Government will accept delivery of proposal scheduled for delivery on a federal holiday?

Close date changed in SF30 to 18 Feb 2020

4:00PM PST.

36 Section 00 11 19 Para 3.

MAICS Code PG. 3

Section 00 11 19 page 3 reflects this contract falls under NAICS code 237990 Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction. Can the Government please confirm this contract is heavily focused on Construction, as the Systems Engineering, Systems Design, Cyber Security, and Technology Refresh components do not fit within the 237990 NAICS Code description.

There can be only one NAICS for a procurement. Given the nature of the work and the preponderance of the cost, NAICS 237990 was selected.

37 Section 00 21 16 Para. 4.4 Factor 2‐ Experience Pg. 10

Section 00 21 16 page 10, 4.4 Factor 2‐ Experience states, "Any project not completed will not be considered," can the Government please provide further clarification of this statement? For example, if an offeror has an ongoing contract with relevant systems engineering, systems design, and cyber security requirements, will the Government not consider this reference since it's currently ongoing?

Any "project" submitted must be completed.

This is not necessarily the same as a contract, if the contract is an IDIQ.

A task order under and IDIQ contract must be complete.

38 Section 00 11 19 Paragraph:

5.1.6 Page Number: 4

Please clarify where in our Phase One submission we should be submitting the requirements listed under

5.1.6 Responsibility Determination? Should these

documents be provided under a separate Tab after Factors 1‐3?

Submit after factor 3.

39 Section 00 11 19 Paragraph:

5.1.6.1 Page Number: 4

Please clarify if the Surety Form can be completed by any team member, not just the Prime Offeror. Since this is a Small Business Set Aside, and most (if not all) Task Orders issued under this contract would not exceed $2M, would the Government consider reducing this requirement to $2M?

The surety form is for the prime contractor (including joint ventures). The aggregate bonding capacity (not individual bonding capacity) remains at $10M.

40 SF 1442 SF 1442 requires "Offerors must demonstrate a minimum aggregate bonding capacity of $10 million."

However, 52.228‐1 BID GUARANTEE (SEP 1996) is included to require that “[t]he amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20 percent of the bid price or $3,000,000, whichever is less.”

1) Offerors must demonstrate an aggregate (total) bonding capacity of $10M.

2) An irrevocable letter

Question: Will the Government please clarify the dollar amount of the minimum bonding capacity that Offerors must demonstrate?

Question: May Offerors submit an Irrevocable Letter of Credit to demonstrate minimum bonding capacity?

Question: Will the Government allow Offeror's subcontractors bonding capacity to be considered as part of Offeror’s overall bonding capacity?

of credit is limited to $150,000 and is not the same as demonstrating the aggregate bonding capacity.

3) No, the prime must demonstrate the bonding capacity on their own.

41 Section 00 11 19 Paragraph:

5.2.2 Page Number: 4

Please clarify if the Safety Form provided in Attachment I can be completed by any team member, not just the Prime Offeror. As a Small Business, we have not had to track Safety in this manner – this has typically been done by the construction contractor. Would the Government consider changing this requirement to a description of our Safety Program?

The form is only completed by the prime.

Provide an explanation as to why information is not submitted. The factor remains unchanged.

42 Section 6 Key Personnel Page Number: 74

Will the Government allow candidates for the position of Project Manager to be employees of subcontractors to the Prime?

No.

43 Section L Paragraph: 4.3 Factor 1 ‐ Technical Approach, 4.4 Factor 2 ‐ Experience Page Number:

Page 9‐10

Will the Government please provide editable word documents to the required attachments (A, B, C, D, F, G).

All forms are provided in Adobe PDF format and editable through the edit/add text function.

44 Section L Paragraph: Factor 2 ‐ Experience Page Number:

Will the Government confirm offerers are able to submit projects completed by their subcontractors who are not design firms using the "Offerer Attachment B "form provided by the Government.

Confirmed.

45 5. Proposal Submittal Requirements Para 5.1.6.1 Surety Form Pg 4

If Offeror is a new Joint Venture with no previous bonding experience, can the surety form be completed using and referencing the surety's experience with the JV Partner companies?

The surety must provide a form for the legal entity (JV) that will perform the contract. If there is no history, then that information need not be included by the surety.

46 Section 4.3 Para (a) 2 Pg. 9 Does the single‐page Organizational Chart, count against the 4 single‐sided page limit for the "Offeror Team Composition & Management" Section?

No it does not.

47 Attachment B ‐ Experience Offeror Question 10 pg. 2

Please provide examples of Sustainable Features, that the Government might expect in this project.

Refer to Part 2, Section 01 33 29.05 20

SUSTAINABILITY

REPORTING FOR

DESIGN‐BUILD in the Task Order.

48 Section 4. Phase One ‐ Submission Requirements & Evaluation Factors 4.4 Factor 2 ‐ Experience Pg. 10

Are we to submit a maximum of 5 Project Data Sheets each for Offeror and Designer, or a total of 5 data sheets combined from Offeror and Designer?

It is a limit of five (5) total and can be a mix of the offeror, designer, and major subcontractors.

49 RFP SF 1442 Pg. 1 Sealed offers in original and 3 copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by 04:00 PM (hour) 17 Feb 2020 local time (date). Is the proposal due at 1600 EST?

The Proposal due date will be 18 Feb 2020 by

4:00 PM PST

50 RFP 6. SELECTION OF

OFFERORS FOR PHASE TWO:

Pg. 12

6.2 Phase One evaluation will result in a

determination of the most highly qualified Offerors.

The Government will evaluate proposals and select approximately five (5) offerors to submit a Phase Two proposal. What is the expected date/timeframe for the government to notify Phase 1 Bidders if they have been selected to participate in Phase 2?

What is the timeframe for Phase 2 submission and award?

The expected timeframe planned for participants to be selected and notified to move into Phase II is April/May.

Phase II submission is planned for June with a planned award date of October 2020. These dates may change depending on the number of phase I and II offers received.

51 DRFP Q&A Question 20 Gov't. Answer: As this is a design‐build contract, we expect the prime contractor to be a construction firm and to utilize the services of an Architect and Engineering firm. Further, we consider an engineering degree for four of the key personnel to be appropriate for the level of supervision and oversight expected of the design and engineering services to be performed on the contract. Given that this is a SB award, would the government confirm that bidders are not required to be construction or architect and engineering firms, so long as they have relevant experience and qualified key personnel?

While offerors must list the NAICS in their SAM profile, in order to certify they are a small business for this NAICS;

there is no requirement that the prime be a construction firm;

however, the evaluation panel may consider that a non‐construction firm supervising construction subcontractors introduces a higher level of risk.

52 SECTION 00 72 00 GENERAL

CONDITIONS 6. KEY

PERSONNEL

RESPONSIBILITIES AND

REQUIREMENTS: Pg 75‐76

Of the 7 key personnel categories, all but one (the PE) are required to be employees of the prime. Given that this is a SB award, would the government consider modifying this requirement so that supporting subcontractors can provide some of these KP roles, for example Project Managers?

No.

53 Attachment A Instructions Pg1

"...Modify form as necessary to include all primary construction and design team members…" In order to populate the cells and remain within the allotted page limit, can bidders convert the PDF file to word?

Yes

54 Attachments B‐H In order to populate the cells and remain within the allotted page limit, can bidders convert the PDF file to word?

Yes

55 SECTION 00 11 19 REQUEST

FOR PROPOSALS 5. Proposal Submittal Requirements Pg 4

5.1.6 Responsibility Determination: A summary

responsibility determination will be made prior to determining which offerors will be requested to submit Phase Two proposals. The following items are required to be submitted:

5.1.6.1 Surety Form: Offeror shall submit a

completed form in Attachment “G”...

5.1.6.2 VETS‐4212 Report Submission Confirmation

(or Statement of Non‐applicability)

5.1.6.3 Section 00 45 00 Representations and

Certifications ...

Under which Tab does the Responsibility Determination section go? Or should this be a 4th tab?

See RFP Section 00 11 19 para 5. Proposal Submittal Requirements for solicitation format.

Responsibility Determination is under Section 5.1.6 which falls after 5.1.5 Tab 3‐ Factor 3, Past Performance.

56 SECTION 00 72 00 GENERAL

CONDITIONS 6. KEY

PERSONNEL

RESPONSIBILITIES AND

REQUIREMENTS Pg 76

Requirements state that certain KP must “...Have completed the course entitled “Construction Quality Management (CQM) for Contractors” and shall maintain a current course certificate.' Can proposed key personnel complete this course certificate prior to start of work, or must they have satisfied this requirement with proposal submission?

The course must be completed before starting work. Offerors will not be rated negatively for not having completed the course prior to submission of the proposal.

57 SECTION 00 72 00 GENERAL

CONDITIONS 6. KEY

PERSONNEL

RESPONSIBILITIES AND

REQUIREMENTS

Can experience be substituted for the degree discipline for the Quality Control Manager experience? For example, a candidate has a Bachelor's degree, but not in the disciplines cited and extensive experience (e.g. 15 years) in Quality Control.

The requirements for the Quality Control Manager shall remain as currently stated in the

RFP.

3) Administrative changes (summary):

Page 62- Update paragraph Technical Information: Active Vehicle Barriers (AVBs) Page 67- Update to 5.2.3.1 paragraph 3 Page 68- Update to 5.2.3.1 paragraph 5 Page 71- Update to 5.2.3.3 paragraph 5 Page 72 – Update 5.2.4.1 paragraph 1 to include “with emitters”.

Page 73 – Update 5.2.4.2 paragraph 1 to include “with emitters”.

Page 83- Update 5.2.13.2 paragraph 3 to clarify the “NAO” acronym.

Page 83- Update 5.2.13.2 paragraph 4 to clarify the “C4ISR” acronym.

Page 86- Update 5.2.15.3 paragraph 2 to include updated links.

SECTION 00 72 00 - GENERAL CONDITIONS

The following have been modified:

00 72 00

SECTION 00 72 00

GENERAL CONDITIONS

Contract Type & Special Contract Requirements

1. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC)

1.1 Overview. The NAVFAC Anti-terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) Ashore Program mission is to procure, deliver, integrate, install and sustain Systems hardware, firmware and associated software required to provide operations personnel with the ability to protect mission-critical assets and personnel from natural disasters, acts of terrorism and other human-caused disasters. The NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program functions as a conduit for improving the security posture at Navy shore installations worldwide. NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program Systems/equipment are defined as systems/equipment that facilitate the detection, delay, deterrence, assessment and response to terrorist events. There are three types of Systems/equipment included as part of this program.

The three types are Physical Security/Access Control (PS/AC), Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I), and Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN)/ Emergency Management (EM) Systems/equipment. The NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program Physical Security/Access Control Systems – 2 (PS/AC-2) Contract will cover PS/AC Systems/equipment Execution and Technology Refreshment Projects/requirements.

1.2 A Multiple Award Construction Contract is a contract awarded from a single solicitation, and may result in award to multiple contractors. This procurement consists of one solicitation with the intent to award three or more Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Construction Contracts to the Offeror(s) whose proposal(s), conforming to the RFP, will be most advantageous to the Government resulting in the Best Value, cost or price and other factors considered. The Government reserves the right to award less than three, if the Source Selection Authority determines that there are not enough qualified offerors. The Government reserves the right not to award the Proposed Task Order #X001 (seed project).

2. CONTRACT TYPE

This is an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract with pre-established labor rates for key personnel positions. There will be a base ordering period of sixty months and one (6) month option ordering period (exercised only if a replacement contract is not awarded). Historically task orders average between $200,000 to $5,000,000, however, larger or smaller dollar task order projects may be required. The minimum task order amount is $2,000. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined by a Contracting Officer, who will issue written Task Orders to the contractor. Award of Task Orders will be on a firm fixed price basis. This is not a requirements contract.

3. SET-ASIDE: This contract is a 100% set-aside for Small Business with a reserve for one Women Owned Small Business.

4. NAICS CODE: 237990 Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction. Size Standard: $39.5M

5. DESCRIPTION OF WORK

5.1 Introduction. The NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program vision is to implement effective and sustainable protection from attacks against United States Navy (USN) shore installations and to employ judicious, effective, and coordinated management for consequences resulting from both natural and man-made disasters. The Program will provide fully developed capability, operating in a joint framework, networked with local, regional, and national command structures.

5.1.1 Scope of Work. The scope of this NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program Physical Security/Access Control Systems – 2 (PS/AC-2) Contract is to acquire supplies and services including installation of hardware, firmware and associated software, testing and operations support, training and technical manuals.

Major work elements for this effort include:

5.1.1.1 Systems Engineering and Planning, Design, Equipment Selection and Procurement, Equipment Integration and Installation, and Testing

5.1.1.2 System Manuals and Technical Documentation as required; and

5.1.1.3 Contract Support and Data Requirements.

This Contract covers the design, procurement, integration, installation, upgrade, replacement, technology refreshment (tech refresh), testing, and initial training for NAVFAC AT/FP Program PS/AC Systems/equipment to include hardware, firmware and associated software at Navy shore installations throughout the world including Joint Bases assigned to the Navy. This Basic Contract PWS which includes this Part 1 Proposal Forms and Documents and Part 6 Attachments provides an overview of the types of Systems/equipment, to include hardware, firmware and associated software to be installed and the general requirements and anticipated technologies. The specific types of PS/AC Systems covered in this contract include, but are not limited to, Automated Vehicle Gates (AVGs), Automated Pedestrian Turnstiles (APTs), Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) Gates, Enclaves, Active Vehicle Barriers (AVBs), Electronic Security Systems (ESSs) and Physical Security Information Management (PSIM) Systems. Project and installation specific requirements are detailed in the individual Task Order PWSs.

The Contractor will receive a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the individual Task Orders from the Government which will include a Task Order Package specific to the capability to be installed under the individual Task Orders. Task Orders will be awarded on an enterprise (multi-region), regional or installation/site specific basis.

5.1.2 Physical Security/Access Control (PS/AC) Systems. Perimeter security and access control are important components of the AT/FP Ashore posture at Navy installations worldwide. Descriptions of the NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program Physical Security/Access Control (PS/AC) Systems are provided in the following paragraphs in this section. Complete details and NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program technical performance requirements and operational capabilities for the NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program PS/AC Systems are provided in this Section 00 72 00, Paragraphs 5.1.2., 5.1.2.1-5.1.2.5, 5.1.3, and 5.1.3.1-5.1.3.2 of Part 1 Proposal Forms and Documents and Part 6 Attachments of this Basic Contract PWS and Part 2 General Requirements, Part 3 Statement of Work / Project Program, Part 4 Minimum Materials, Engineering and Construction Requirements and Part 6 Attachments of the individual Task Order PWSs, as applicable.

5.1.2.1 Automated Vehicle Gates (AVGs), Automated Pedestrian Turnstiles (APTs), and Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) Gates.

Automated Vehicle Gates (AVGs) are automated Access Control Points (ACPs) which provide access control for Privately Owned Vehicles (POVs), Government Owned Vehicles (GOVs), and commercial vehicles at perimeter Access Control Points (ACPs) and interior security Enclave ACPs.

The Automated Pedestrian Turnstiles (APTs) and Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) Gates are automated Access Control Points (ACPs) which are intended for pedestrians to enter one at a time without requiring sentry interaction during most operational periods. At locations requiring accommodations for cyclists, personnel delivering packages, and for personnel with special needs such as wheelchair access, specially designed automated Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) Gates which are Swing Gates, approved by the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA)/Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), can be collocated with standard turnstiles.

The NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program technical performance requirements and operational capabilities for AVG, APT and ABA Gate automated ACP systems are established in the NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Performance Specification (P-Spec) for Access Control Point – Automated which is provided in Appendix E – AT/FP Ashore Performance Specifications (P-Specs) and Requirements Traceability Matrixes (RTMs) of this Basic Contract PWS. (Refer to this Section 00 72 00, Paragraphs 5.1.3. and 5.1.3.1 of Part 1 Proposal Forms and Documents of this Basic Contract PWS and Appendix E – AT/FP Ashore Performance Specifications (P-Specs) and Requirements Traceability Matrixes (RTMs) which is provided as GFI in Part 6 Attachments of this Basic Contract

PWS.)

5.1.2.2 Enclaves.

An Enclave is intended to provide additional layers of security to a perimeter or area of interest within each Navy Installation requiring an enhanced security posture. The NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore

Program technical performance requirements and operational capabilities for Enclave systems are established in the NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Performance Specification (P-Spec) for Enclave which is provided in Appendix E – AT/FP Ashore Performance Specifications (P-Specs) of this Basic Contract PWS. (Refer to RFP Section 00 72 00, Paragraphs 5.1.3. and 5.1.3.1 of Part 1 Proposal Forms and Documents of this Basic Contract PWS and Appendix E – AT/FP Ashore Performance Specifications (P-Specs) and Requirements Traceability Matrixes (RTMs) which is provided as GFI in Part 6 Attachments of this Basic Contract PWS.)

5.1.2.3 Active Vehicle Barriers (AVBs).

The design of an Entry Control Facility (ECF)/Access Control Point (ACP) must ensure that vehicles are contained through an arrangement which includes Active Vehicle Barriers (AVBs). AVBs require some action, either by personnel, equipment, or both, to prevent entry of a threat vehicle. ECFs/ACPs must be provided with Active Vehicle Barriers (AVBs) to enable the ECF/ACP to be closed (fully contained) and to prevent a threat vehicle from breeching the security. The design of the ECF/ACP must include provisions to protect innocent users of the ECF/ACP from operation of the AVB whether deployment is accidental, during a test, or during an actual response to a threat.

The NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program technical performance requirements and operational capabilities for Active Vehicle Barriers (AVBs) are provided in the following documents: Multimode Active Vehicle Barrier (MAVB) Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM); List of DoD Certified Anti-Ram Vehicle Barriers, UFC 4-022-01 Entry Control Facilities Access Control Points, and UFC 4-022-02 Selection and Application of Vehicle Barriers. (Refer to this Section 00 72 00, Paragraph to

5.1.3. and 5.1.3.1 of Part 1 Proposal Forms and Documents and to the List of DoD Certified Anti- Ram Vehicle Barriers, UFC 4-022-01 and UFC 4-022-02 which are provided as GFI in Part 6 Attachments of this Basic Contract PWS.)

The following additional NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program technical performance requirements and operational capabilities are established for Active Vehicle Barriers (AVBs) in accordance with UFC 4-022-01: (1) Selected active vehicle barriers (AVBs) must be included on the list of DoD Certified Anti-Ram Vehicle Barriers maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Protective Design Center (PDC); and (2) AVBs must be designed and implemented in accordance with UFC 4- 022-02, UFGS 34 71 13.19 Active Vehicle Barriers, and UFGS 34 41 26.00 10 Access Control Point Control System. (Refer to this Section 00 72 00, Paragraphs 5.1.3, and 5.1.3.1 of Part 1 Proposal Forms and Documents and to the List of DoD Certified Anti-Ram Vehicle Barriers, UFC 4-022-01 and UFC 4-022-02 which are provided as GFI in Part 6 Attachments of this Basic Contract PWS.)

5.1.2.4 Electronic Security Systems (ESSs).

An Electronic Security System (ESS) is an integrated electronic system that encompasses interior and exterior Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) systems for assessment of alarm conditions, Automated Access Control Systems (ACS), Data Transmission Media (DTM), and alarm reporting systems for monitoring, control, and display. An ESS includes equipment such as sensors, cameras, card readers, processing control units (PCUs), field panels, and workstations.

The NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program manages the execution of ESS projects when required for the protection of critical assets in accordance with OPNAVINST 11010.20H CH-1. In the case of facilities with spaces having these types of assets, the NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program supports the installation of the baseline system required for the accreditation of the space. This includes equipment such as the PCU, e.g., IDS panel, ACS panel, point sensors at the perimeter access points, volumetric sensors within the space, and a card reader/key pad and video assessment (CCTV) at the primary entrance.

The NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program technical performance requirements and operational capabilities for Electronic Security Systems are provided in the Policy Baseline requirements and notional layouts in Appendix C Notional Interior IDS Configurations of UFC 4-021-02 Electronic Security Systems. (Refer to this Section 00 72 00, Paragraphs 5.1.3, and 5.1.3.1 of Part 1 Proposal Forms and Documents and UFC 4-021-02 which is provided as GFI in Part 6 Attachments of this Basic Contract PWS.)

5.1.2.5 Physical Security Information Management (PSIM) System.

Physical Security Information Management (PSIM) provides the ability for Security personnel to rapidly and easily analyze sensor information and make accurate situational assessments of a given incident. The PSIM System collects and correlates events from existing dissimilar traditional security devices and information Systems (video, access control, sensors, alarms, analytics, networks, etc.) to enable personnel to identify and proactively resolve situations. A typical PSIM System provides the following core capabilities:

Collection: Device independent software collects data from any number of disparate security devices or Systems.

Analysis: The system analyzes and correlates the data, events, and alarms, allowing for rapid situational assessment.

Verification: Presents the relevant situation information in a quick and easy way to analyze format for an operator to verify the situation.

Resolution: The system provides Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and tools to resolve the situation.

Reporting: The PSIM software tracks all the information and provides user defined and canned reports.

The NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program technical performance requirements and operational capabilities for PSIM systems are established in the NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Performance Specification (P-Spec) for Physical Security Information Management (PSIM) which is provided in Appendix E – AT/FP Ashore Performance Specifications (P-Specs) and Requirements Traceability Matrixes (RTMs) of this Basic Contract PWS. (Refer to this Section 00 72 00, Paragraph s 5.1.3, and

5.1.3.1 of Part 1 Proposal Forms and Documents and Appendix E – AT/FP Ashore Performance Specifications (P-Specs) and Requirements Traceability Matrixes (RTMs) which is provided as GFI in Part 6 Attachments of this Basic Contract PWS.)

5.1.3 AT/FP Ashore Program Management.

The NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program Management Office (PMO) receives requirements from Commander, Navy Installations Command (CNIC) N3AT/EM which are then incorporated as Systems into the NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program through the Roll-out Plan (ROP). An Acquisition Execution Plan (AEP) of planned Contracts and individual Task Orders is established annually to facilitate execution of Systems identified for the particular Fiscal Year (FY) in the ROP. A Contract/Task Order Team, along with support from the Region, is then assigned to develop, facilitate the award and oversee execution of the Contracts and individual Task Orders established in the AEP. The Contract/Task Order Team initially develops Timelines for Contracts and individual Task Orders to facilitate execution of the AEP from the development of the Contract and individual Task Order Request for Proposal (RFP) packages through award of the Contract and individual Task Orders.

This PS/AC-2 Basic Contract PWS and individual Task Order PWSs identify the specific requirements for NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program PS/AC Systems hardware, firmware and associated software, and services to be installed and/or provided, and whether the solution is enterprise (multi-region), region or installation specific. Each installation and/or region has specific security needs and general protection requirements that the Contractor shall address in order to meet operational requirements. This Basic Contract PWS and individual Task Order PWSs also specify the Systems/equipment performance parameters, data, and installation requirements for each project to be procured under the NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program.

The Government releases an RFP for this Basic Contract and individual Task Orders to facilitate preparation and submission of contractor proposals. The Contractor may be asked to participate in a Pre-Award Site Survey and submit Requests for Information (RFI) to the Government.

The Contractor shall use this Basic Contract PWS as overall guidance and the individual Task Order PWSs as specific guidance for developing Systems solutions based on the NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program technical performance requirements and operational capabilities provided as Government-Furnished Information (GFI) with this Basic Contract PWS and individual Task Order PWSs, as applicable. The NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program technical performance requirements and operational capabilities for the NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program PS/AC Systems/equipment are established in the following: NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Performance Specifications (P-Specs) and Requirements Traceability Matrixes (RTMs), Technical Information and Other Information which are provided as GFI with this Basic Contract PWS and Site Specific Information which is provided as GFI with the individual Task Order PWSs, as applicable.

(Refer to this Section 00 72 00, Paragraphs 5.1.2, 5.1.2.1-5.1.2.5, 5.1.3, 5.1.3.1, and 5.1.3.2 of Part 1 Proposal Forms and Documents and Part 6 Attachments of this Basic Contract PWS and Part 2 General Requirements, Part 3 Statement of Work / Project Program, Part 4 Minimum Materials, Engineering and Construction Requirements and Part 6 Attachments of the individual Task Order PWSs.)

The structure of the Basic Contract PWS and individual Task Order PWSs are detailed follows:

5.1.3.1 This Basic Contract includes the following:

Part 1 Proposal Forms and Documents – Includes the requirements for the NAVFAC AT/FP Ashore Program Physical Security/Access Control (PS/AC) Systems/equipment to be installed under this Basic Contract PWS and individual Task Order PWSs.

Part 6 Attachments – Includes the following:

Government Furnished-Material (GFM) – Includes material which is not specific to an individual Task Order PWS. GFM is listed in Part 6 Attachments of the Basic Contract PWS and will be provided by the Government as GFM separately after award of this Basic Contract, as required.

Government Furnished-Equipment (GFE) – Includes equipment which is not specific to an individual Task Order PWS.