Q_A_1.docx

DOCX document 27 KB Posted

Attached to
Worldwide Logistics Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N00033-14-R-6506
Issued by
Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command

About this file

Questions Answers (2/20)

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Worldwide Logistics, newest first.
File Type Posted
WWL_-_Award_Synopsis.docx DOCX document
Q_A_4.docx DOCX document
Attachment_15_(Amendment_0002)_-_Logistics_Personnel_Quals.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0002.doc DOC document
Attachment_25_(Amendment_0001)_-_Mission_Essential_Contractor_Services_Plan.doc DOC document
Attachment_15_(Amendment_0001)_-_Logistics_Personnel_Quals.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0001.doc DOC document
Q_A_3.docx DOCX document
Q_A_2.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_FINAL.doc DOC document
Attachment_19_-_Past_Perf_Data_Sheet.doc DOC document
Attachment_16_-_ScheduledGovernmentFurnishedProperty-VERSION1.4_distributed_.pdf PDF
Attachment_24_-_Wage_Determinations.pdf PDF
Attachment_20_-_Pricing_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_14_-_Resume_Format.docx DOCX document
Attachment_10_-_GSIP.pdf PDF
Attachment_15_-_Logistics_Personnel_Quals.docx DOCX document
Attachment_3b_-_historical_workload_volume.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_17_-_DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment_13_-_ILS_Handbook.pdf PDF
Attachment_8_-_MASP_Initialization_Procedures.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_-_CMIS_Software_User_Manual.doc DOC document
Attachment_23_-_PAP.doc DOC document
Attachment_7_-_SUPPLY_EFFECTIVENESS.pdf PDF
Attachment_18_-_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.doc DOC document
Attachment_5_-_WinMasp_Manual.pdf PDF
Attachment_12_-_CDMP_4709.3c.pdf PDF
WWL_RFP_(Final_2-6).doc DOC document
Attachment_9_-_WinMASP_EOA_Export_QA_Checklist.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_List_of_Govt_office_space_counts_and_locations_Logistics_Services.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_6_-_SAMPLE_MLAPL.pdf PDF
Attachment_3a_-_Sample_MRT_Schedule.PDF PDF
Attachment_11_-_Shore_Infrastructure_Guidebook.pdf PDF
Attachment_22_-_NDAs.docx DOCX document
Attachment_1_-_List_of_Government_Owned_Automated_Logistics_Systems.pdf PDF
Attachment_21_-_SF_LLL.pdf PDF
WWL_-_Draft_RFP_(rev._12-24).docx DOCX document
WWL_-_Synopsis_(rev._12-24).docx DOCX document
Show all 38

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND

N00033-14-R-6506

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors. The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation.

1. Is there an interested bidder’s list?

ANSWER: No, an interested bidder’s list will not be available.

2. The RFP had DRAFT watermarked on the first two pages. Is this an error?

ANSWER: Yes, the DRAFT watermark was an error. The official RFP was posted on 07 February 2014. Disregard the version with the DRAFT watermark.

3. Taking into consideration the importance of past performance and that it is an evaluation factor, please clarify if the reference to FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv) should be removed from the solicitation.

If FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv) is not removed from the solicitation, please clarify (1) how a neutral past performance rating factors into the evaluation and (2) if an offeror with a neutral past performance rating can be eligible for award, given the requirement for acceptable past performance.

ANSWER: The reference to FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv) is correct. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a) (2) (iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

4. The pricing spreadsheet requires hours to be priced against a “Data Systems Management Specialist” but there are no qualifications for this labor category in the Personnel Qualifications attachment. Please provide the qualifications for Data Systems Management Specialist.

ANSWER: An amendment will be issued for the RFP to add qualifications for a Data Systems Management Specialist.

5. Instructions state “Technical Experience (shall be limited to thirty (30) 8.5” x 11” pages, 1-inch page margins, and 12-point font).” Is it permissible to include a title page, table of contents, list of figures, and glossary of acronyms at the start of Volume I and Volume II, outside all page limitations?

ANSWER: Yes, this is permissible. An amendment will be issued for the RFP to add these additional instructions.

6. Two labor categories, Purchase/Financial Data Analyst Lead and Business Process Analyst are labeled “key personnel” but do not have a number of required key resumes. Please clarify that one key resume is required for each.

ANSWER: Purchase/Financial Data Analyst and Business Process Analyst are not key personnel. An amendment will be issued for the RFP to remove the “key personnel” label from these labor categories.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .