Attachment_18_-_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.doc

DOC document 659 KB Posted

Attached to
Worldwide Logistics Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N00033-14-R-6506
Issued by
Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command

About this file

Attachment 18 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Worldwide Logistics, newest first.
File Type Posted
WWL_-_Award_Synopsis.docx DOCX document
Q_A_4.docx DOCX document
Attachment_15_(Amendment_0002)_-_Logistics_Personnel_Quals.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0002.doc DOC document
Attachment_25_(Amendment_0001)_-_Mission_Essential_Contractor_Services_Plan.doc DOC document
Attachment_15_(Amendment_0001)_-_Logistics_Personnel_Quals.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0001.doc DOC document
Q_A_3.docx DOCX document
Q_A_2.docx DOCX document
Q_A_1.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_FINAL.doc DOC document
Attachment_19_-_Past_Perf_Data_Sheet.doc DOC document
Attachment_16_-_ScheduledGovernmentFurnishedProperty-VERSION1.4_distributed_.pdf PDF
Attachment_24_-_Wage_Determinations.pdf PDF
Attachment_20_-_Pricing_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_14_-_Resume_Format.docx DOCX document
Attachment_10_-_GSIP.pdf PDF
Attachment_15_-_Logistics_Personnel_Quals.docx DOCX document
Attachment_3b_-_historical_workload_volume.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_17_-_DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment_13_-_ILS_Handbook.pdf PDF
Attachment_8_-_MASP_Initialization_Procedures.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_-_CMIS_Software_User_Manual.doc DOC document
Attachment_23_-_PAP.doc DOC document
Attachment_7_-_SUPPLY_EFFECTIVENESS.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_-_WinMasp_Manual.pdf PDF
Attachment_12_-_CDMP_4709.3c.pdf PDF
WWL_RFP_(Final_2-6).doc DOC document
Attachment_9_-_WinMASP_EOA_Export_QA_Checklist.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_List_of_Govt_office_space_counts_and_locations_Logistics_Services.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_6_-_SAMPLE_MLAPL.pdf PDF
Attachment_3a_-_Sample_MRT_Schedule.PDF PDF
Attachment_11_-_Shore_Infrastructure_Guidebook.pdf PDF
Attachment_22_-_NDAs.docx DOCX document
Attachment_1_-_List_of_Government_Owned_Automated_Logistics_Systems.pdf PDF
Attachment_21_-_SF_LLL.pdf PDF
WWL_-_Draft_RFP_(rev._12-24).docx DOCX document
WWL_-_Synopsis_(rev._12-24).docx DOCX document
Show all 38

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

TO:

FACSIMILE:

PHONE:

EMAIL:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by 1400 HRS local time in Washington, DC on 7 March 2014 to Troy Francis at troy.francis@navy.mil. Information can also be sent via facsimile to the attention of Troy Francis at (202) 685-5929. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you, Troy Francis

Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Troy Francis

914 Charles Morris Ct SE, Washington DC 20398

From:

(Name and Address of Organization)

(Point of Contact Name)

(Facsimile/Phone Number)

(E-mail Address)

To (Point of Contact Name)

Troy Francis (Facsimile Number)

(202) 685-5929

(E-mail Address) troy.francis@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD:

DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1.

Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organization.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

MSC V1.1 (23 July 2013)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .