N00024-19-R-4447_Amendment_0001.pdf

N0002419FR93063

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment 0001 to the solicitation includes the follow ing:

Section J: Inclusion of Attachment S-7 Proposal Assessment CG65CG71 and S-8 Pier and Drydock Graphical Representation Template Section L: Revision of Section L INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS Section M: Revision of Section M EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Section L has been revised to 1) clarify the documentation necessary for Factor 1, and 2) Factor 2 has been divided into sub-factors. The sub-factors provide more detail and clarity to the requirements of Section L. Section M has been revised to correspond to the changes in Section L. Both Section L and M have been reformatted for ease of locating specif ic paragraphs.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 16

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 22-Mar-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N0002419R4447

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

01-Mar-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

22-Mar-2019

CODE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2030

N00024 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0002419R4447

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

DOCUMENTS/EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) form a part of this solicitation:

No. Document Attachment S-1 Manpower Utilization Data Sheet Attachment S-2 Dry-Dock Utilization Data Sheet Attachment S-3 Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Form CHOSIN MODPRD Attachment S-4 Manpower Plan to Actual Data Sheet Attachment S-5 Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet Attachment S-6 Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price Reduction Tables Attachment S-7 Proposal Assessment CG 65/CG 71 (Amendment 0001) Attachment S-8 Pier and Drydock Graphical Representation Template (Amendment 0001) Attachment S-13 Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Form CAPE ST GEORGE MODPRD

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) also form a part of this solicitation and will form a part of the contract resulting from this solicitation:

CG 65 FY20 MODPRD

Attachment J-1 Specification Package No. TPPC-CG65-SWRMC19-CN01 Attachment J-2 Work Item Plans, Drawings, and Other References Attachment J-3 Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates Attachment J-4 Pricing Workbook Attachment J-5 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan CHOSIN MODPRD Attachment J-6 Subcontracting Plan (to be incorporated upon award) Attachment J-7 Schedule Model Review

CG 71 FY21 MODPRD

Attachment J-11 Specification Package No. TPPC-CG71-SWRMC20-CN01 Attachment J-12 Work Item Plans, Drawings, and Other References Attachment J-13 Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates Attachment J-14 Pricing Workbook Attachment J-15 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan CAPE ST GEORGE MODPRD Attachment J-16 Subcontracting Plan (to be incorporated upon award) Attachment J-17 Schedule Model Review

Exhibit A Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) A001-A003; A005-A009; A011; A012; A014 (Does not include A004, A0010, or A0013) Exhibit B Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) B001-B009 Exhibit C Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) C001-C002

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

I. INTRODUCTION

A. This solicitation is a Request for Proposals (RFP) that will result in the award of a single Fixed-Price contract to complete both the USS CHOSIN (CG 65) Modernization Period (MODPRD) availability and the USS CAPE ST. GEORGE (CG 71) Modernization Period (MODPRD) availability.

B. The Government intends to award a single Fixed-Price contract to the offeror whose proposal represents the Best Value to the Government, after evaluation in accordance with Section M of this solicitation.

C. ALL INQUIRIES shall be made in writing and directed to Martha Bello, Contracting Officer, and Justin Lessel, Contract Specialist, at martha.bello@navy.mil, and justin.d.lessel@navy.mil, respectively. To ensure the Government is able to adequately address and respond to offeror pre-proposal information (PPI) via amendment, it is requested questions be submitted no later than 1 April 2019 at 3:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. The Navy reserves the right to not answer any requests received after this date and time.

Furthermore, offerors should note that the proposal due date will not be extended solely on the basis of requests received after this date and time. Solicitation questions should reference the solicitation and/or specification page and paragraph number and be submitted on the Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) form (Attachment S-3 and Attachment S-13) provided with this solicitation.

D. Estimated Award Date: The Government anticipates making an award in September 2019.

II. INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

A. Proposal Due Date:

1. All copies of proposals (Volumes I & II) shall be received by the Government at the address below no later than 16 May 2019 at 3:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. Electronic submittal of proposals will not be accepted. Late proposals WILL NOT be considered. Partial proposals or attachments submitted late WILL NOT be considered. Offerors are advised to consult FAR 15.208 related to timely receipt of proposals.

a) Offerors must provide a proposal valid for at least 120 calendar days from the proposal due date.

(Complete block 12 of the Standard Form (SF) 33).

B. Proposal Submission:

1. Proposals shall be sent to:

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) HQ Attn: Martha Bello

SEA 02445

1333 Isaac Hull Ave SE, Washington Navy Yard, DC 20736

2. Offerors shall mark all submittals “DO NOT OPEN PACKAGE IN MAIL ROOM—FORWARD UNOPENED DIRECTLY TO MARTHA BELLO”. The outside of the package shall clearly indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the contents of the package.

Volume Title Number of Paper Originals (See Note 1)

Number of Paper Copies

Number of CDs (See Notes 2 &3)

I Price Proposal 1 0 2 II Technical Proposal 1 3 4

a) Note 1: Originals may be shipped in the same boxes as the copies to eliminate excess shipping costs. However, originals should be clearly labeled “ORIGINAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL” or “ORIGINAL PRICE PROPOSAL.” The exterior of each box MUST clearly indicate its contents.

b) Note 2: The CDs must be scanned to ensure that the files contained on them do not contain any computer viruses. The CDs shall be labeled to indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the associated volume numbers.

c) Note 3: The files on the CD shall be in a format that is compatible with and capable of being opened in the most current Microsoft Office Suite or Adobe Acrobat. The material presented in electronic format shall be identical to the paper copy of the proposal. In cases where the hard copy and the electronic copy of the proposal conflict, the hard copy shall take precedence. All spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format such that each mathematical equation is obvious.

No fields shall be password protected. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.

III. GENERAL INFORMATION

A. Ship Checks:

1. The USS CHOSIN (CG 65) is available for ship check prior to the proposal submission due date.

Offerors, including significant subcontractors, may inspect the USS CHOSIN (CG 65) prior to proposal delivery.

2. The USS CAPE ST. GEORGE (CG 71) is available for ship check prior to the proposal submission due date. Offerors, including significant subcontractors, may inspect the USS CAPE ST. GEORGE (CG 71) prior to proposal delivery.

3. To schedule a ship check, offerors shall email a "Request for Ship Check" to Martha Bello and Justin Lessel at martha.bello@navy.mil and justin.d.lessel@navy.mil, respectively. Due to the ship location, additional information will be provided upon request.

4. Participants will be subject to security, safety, and other applicable regulations established by Southwest Regional Maintenance Center (SWRMC) and ship’s Commanding Officers swrmc.security.var.fct@navy.mil and ship’s Commanding Officers.

B. Specifications and associated reference documentation

1. Upon request, the Government will provide the Specification Package Work Items and Work Item References.

2. Offerors may request solicitation attachments by submitting a request to:

a) Martha Bello at martha.bello@navy.mil; and

b) Justin Lessel at justin.d.lessel@navy.mil

3. Additional work item references not already in the possession of the offerors, commercially available, listed under 52.211-2, are available through the following websites:

a) https://jedmics.net/

b) https://webjed.nnsy.navy.mil/

c) https://psjed.psns.navy.mil/

C. Alteration of Solicitation

1. Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

D. Proposal Information

1. Offerors shall not presume the Government has knowledge outside of information provided in the proposal. Additionally, offerors are advised that statements such as: “the offeror understands”, “the offeror has a long history of outstanding support”, “standard procedures shall be used”, “well known techniques shall be employed”, or any paraphrasing of the solicitation, shall be considered inadequate to demonstrate experience, knowledge of, or compliance with solicitation requirements. Offerors are encouraged to provide specific and concise information to validate all assertions.

E. Amendments

1. The Government may revise the solicitation at any time by means of an Amendment. It is an offeror’s responsibility to ensure it is accessing the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website to view potential amendments and procurement notifications for this solicitation.

F. Teaming Arrangements

1. Proposals must be submitted by one (1) prime contractor. An Offeror may be listed as a subcontractor in multiple proposals but may only submit one (1) proposal as a prime contractor with a unique Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code and Taxpayer Identification Number. To be evaluated as a Joint Venture (JV), offerors must provide a notarized agreement (with the price proposal) delineating roles and responsibilities for all proposed work.

IV. PROPOSAL FORMAT

A. To facilitate efficiency and consistency in proposal evaluation the following is mandatory. PROPOSALS

WHICH DO NOT FOLLOW THIS DIRECTION MAY BE REJECTED AS NON-RESPONSIVE

AND THUS INELIGIBLE FOR AWARD.

B. Hard Copy Proposals

1. All pages, except the Integrated Master Schedule, shall be double-sided on 8.5 x 11 inch paper with a one-inch margin. The text used shall be Times New Roman with a minimum font size of 12-point.

Each side of the page shall count as one “page”. Any type contained on graphics pages will not be smaller than 10-point font, shall be legible, and readable. Any pages that may be revised as a result of discussions (if required) shall contain revision numbers and date of the proposal revision submission.

Offerors shall use the attachments provided with this solicitation for their proposal content as specified in Section 5.0 where required.

C. Page Limits:

1. Volume I,

i. Cover letter shall not exceed three (3) pages.

ii. No page limitation for remainder of Volume I.

2. Volume II,

a) Factor 1 Eligibility Factor: No page limitation

b) Factor 2 Schedule and Resource Capacity:

1. Subfactor A (1): Shall not exceed 25 pages

2. Subfactor A (2): No page limitation

3. Subfactor A (3): No page limitation

4. Subfactor A (4): No page limitation

5. Subfactor B.(1): Shall not exceed 10 pages

6. Subfactor C.(1): No page limitation

V. PROPOSAL CONTENT

A. VOLUME I

1. Price Proposal: The price proposal shall not contain non-price factor information. The price proposal shall be comprised of the following documentation:

a) Cover Letter,

b) Signed SF 33 with all amendments acknowledged,

c) Small Business Subcontracting plan per FAR Part 19 (large businesses only),

d) Any Joint Venture / teaming agreements (if applicable),

e) Completed Solicitation Section B carrying forward information from the Pricing Workbook

Spreadsheet, Attachment J-4 and Attachment J-14, containing:

(1) Work Item Pricing,

(2) Daily Extension Rates,

(3) Inter-port Differential (IPD),

(4) IPD Reduction for Days Completed Early,

(5) Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor & Material Burden Rate, New Work & Growth Reservation,

f) Completed Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates (Attachment J-3 and Attachment J-13), and

g) Completed Proposal Assessment (Attachment S-7).

2. Cover Letter: The cover letter, which shall not exceed three (3) pages, shall meet all the requirements of the “first page of the proposal” outlined in FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)(i-v). In addition to those requirements, the offeror shall include the following in the cover letter:

a) Identification of all enclosures included with the proposal,

b) CAGE and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers for the Prime contractor,

c) Notice of any alterations to the solicitation, such as “fill-in” blocks and certifications.

d) Notice of any alterations to the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications).

e) Name, address, and telephone number of each proposed first-tier subcontractor with a proposed subcontract estimated at $10 million or more.

f) For any work item (WI) with a total dollar value of zero dollars proposed in each Pricing Workbook

(Attachment J-4 and Attachment J-14) provide an explanation as to why. In addition, if applicable:

(1) For any WI with a total value of zero labor hours proposed (prime and subcontractor combined)

(although material is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

(2) For any WI with a total dollar value of zero material proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although labor is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

3. Standard Form 33 (SF 33): As part of the price proposal package, the offeror shall submit the completed SF 33 with blocks 12 through 18 completed, as well as all sections with applicable “fill-ins” filled in and shall acknowledge all amendments. The representative who signs this form must be authorized to contractually bind the company providing the offer. Section B CLIN pricing must also be completed for ALL APPLICABLE CLINs. The Offeror shall complete and provide all Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements included in Section K of the solicitation. Submission of a signed offer to the Government constitutes agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions of the solicitation in a FFP contracting environment.

4. Subcontracting Plan:

a) A subcontracting plan is NOT REQUIRED from a small business concern.

b) Provide rationale for any proposed goals that are lower than:

(1) 20 percent of prime contracts for small businesses

(2) 5 percent of prime and subcontracts for women-owned small businesses

(3) 5 percent of prime contracts and subcontracts for small disadvantaged businesses

(4) 3 percent of prime contracts and subcontracts for HUBZone small businesses

(5) 3 percent of prime and subcontracts for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses

c) Address FAR 52.219-9 and all of the subparagraphs in FAR 52.219-9(d): subparagraphs (12), (13),

(14) and (15).

5. Completed Solicitation Section B and Pricing Workbooks (Attachment J-4 and Attachment J-14)

a) Offerors must propose on all applicable contract line items (CLINs), complete Section B Note

“SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)”,

complete Section B Note “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: DAILY RATES FOR PIERSIDE AND DRY-DOCKING (FULLY BURDENED)”, and complete each Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet (Attachment J-4 and Attachment J-14) to be considered responsive.

b) The contractor must submit prices using each Pricing Workbook attachment containing Work Item Pricing, Daily Extension Rates, Inter-port Differential (IPD), IPD Reduction for Days Completed Early, Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price (VATEP), and Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate & Material Burden Rate in Microsoft Excel in the format provided in this solicitation. The breakdown of CLIN prices, corresponding to the work item pricing, must add up to the total of each CLIN. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the CLIN price shall govern. The pricing workbook attachment fully burdened ship repair labor rates and material burden rate must match the rates provided in the Section B Note “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)”. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the Section B fully burdened ship repair labor rates and material burden rates shall govern.

c) Offerors are to insert pricing in all yellow shaded fields in the pricing workbook attachment.

6. Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price (VATEP) Schedule Acceleration (USS CHOSIN CG 65 and USS CAPE ST GEORGE CG 71 MODPRD) (Attachment S-6)

a) The Navy would obtain additional value, in terms of additional Operational Availability, should the

Availability complete before its no-later-than completion date. Therefore, the Navy has included a VATEP price adjustment to incorporate this additional value into its price evaluation. The VATEP schedule acceleration adjustment reduction to the offerors proposed price shall be applied in accordance with the VATEP Reduction Tables attachment. Any proposed early completion will be incorporated in the resultant contract via Section F and the Execution Milestones and Key Events (Attachment J-3 and Attachment J-13).

7. Inter-port Differential (IPD)

a) The IPD applicable to the USS CHOSIN CG 65 must be included in all offers and is calculated using foreseeable costs for fuel, towing and pilot charges, and travel to the contractor’s facility by applicable Government personnel. The following chart provides the values to be included in all offerors’ price proposals to determine the offeror’s total evaluated price. Additionally, the Navy has included an Inter-port Differential Reduction for “Days Completed Early” as proposed in the Execution Milestones and Key Events (Attachment J-3).

Location** Differential Inter-port Differential Reduction for “Days Completed Early” stated in Attachment J-3

Portland, OR $5,852,077 -$1,579 Seattle, WA $6,209,646 -$8,280 San Diego, CA $814,187 -$0

b) The IPD applicable to the USS CAPE ST GEORGE CG 71 must be included in all offers and is calculated using foreseeable costs for fuel, towing and pilot charges, and travel to the contractor’s facility by applicable Government personnel. The following chart provides the values to be included in all offerors’ price proposals to determine the offeror’s total evaluated price. Additionally, the Navy has included an Inter-port Differential Reduction for “Days Completed Early” as proposed in the Execution Milestones and Key Events (Attachment J-13).

Location** Differential Inter-port Differential Reduction for “Days Completed Early” stated in Attachment J-3

Portland, OR $5,532,101 -$3,751 Seattle, WA $5,872,612 -$9,010 San Diego, CA $814,187 -$0

c) Offeror’s whose location is not listed in the above Government provided port differential tables shall submit a bidder’s question requesting a Government provided port differential be calculated for the offeror’s proposed location for the USS CHOSIN CG65 and USS CAPE ST GEORGE CG 71 MODPRDs.

B. VOLUME II

Non-Price Proposal: The non-price proposal shall be comprised of two factors, as follows:

1. Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor:

Offerors must provide the following to demonstrate eligibility for Award (There is no page limit associated with this Factor):

a) Provide a completed Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet (Attachment S-5)

b) Provide a signed letter identifying and confirming ownership of a pier capable of berthing and a dry-dock capable of docking the vessel during the applicable period in accordance with the Execution Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3 and Attachment J-13). The representative who signs the letter must be authorized to contractually bind the company. If the offeror is utilizing a subcontractor for physical resources (pier or dry-dock), a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access to the proposed pier & dry-docks is required. The subcontractor representative who signs the letter must be authorized to contractually bind the company.

c) Provide a copy of the offeror's current Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA), MSRA number, or proof of MSRA equivalency that meets the requirement of CNRMC instruction 4280 series. To be eligible for award, a prospective contractor must possess a MSRA as described in DFARS 217.71 Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels (MARAV) or demonstrate organization and facilities equivalent to that reflected in a MSRA. Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of a MSRA must contact the PCO to schedule an on-site inspection.

All requests for MSRA equivalency inspections must be received by 1:00 pm, local time, Washington DC on 01 March 2019. Requests shall be sent to Martha Bello at martha.bello@navy.mil and Justin Lessel at justin.d.lessel@navy.mil. Failure to request an inspection by the designated time may result in a negative determination of offeror eligibility.

d) Provide a current dry-dock certification applicable to the dry-dock proposed for each Availability.

Certifications shall demonstrate the dry-dock will remain certified throughout the entire proposed use of the dry-dock. If the proposed dry-dock is currently uncertified, or if the certification will expire prior to the end of the offeror's proposed docking period, the offeror shall provide a detailed plan and schedule to certify or re-certify the dry-dock in order to remain certified throughout the proposed docking period in the Execution Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3 and Attachment J-13).

2. Factor 2 –Schedule & Resource Capacity:

Offerors shall demonstrate their ability to provide the manpower resources, and the physical resource capacity, to complete the USS CHOSIN (CG 65) and USS CAPE ST GEORGE (CG 71) MODPRD availability requirements as proposed, by addressing the following Subfactors:

a) Subfactor A – Manpower

(1) Offerors shall provide a narrative, not to exceed 25 pages:

(a) That supports the extent to which the offeror has provided the planned manpower resources, both prime and subcontractor, necessary to complete their current projects. As part of their narrative, offerors shall provide:

(i) A root cause analysis of any manpower resource shortfalls (defined as actual manpower resources less than planned manpower resources)

(ii) An explanation of the mitigations implemented and planned to resolve those shortfalls

(iii) An explanation of how the offeror will provide the proposed manpower resources to complete each availability, accounting for the offeror’s current manpower resourcing performance, as shown in the Offeror’s current Progress/Manning data

(b) Corresponding to the curves (total) and (trade), provided in response to Factor 2, Subfactor

A, Manpower, paragraphs (3) and (4), outline how the Offeror will achieve proposed manning levels via overtime, additional hiring actions, or the utilization of subcontractors (if applicable). Outline the state of the offeror’s current workforce (Factor 2, Subfactor A, paragraph (2)) in relationship to the proposed Availabilities, and ensure the following areas are addressed:

(i) Should the offeror propose to utilize overtime for the proposed availabilities, the narrative shall include a plan to manage and provide the overtime associated with the proposed Availabilities.

(ii) Should the offeror propose to hire additional personnel for the proposed Availabilities, the narrative shall include a plan to manage and provide the additional personnel associated with the proposed Availabilities.

(iii) Should the offeror propose to utilize subcontracted resources for the proposed Availabilities, the offeror shall include in their narrative an explanation of the requirements that will be completed by the prime and the work that will be subcontracted, including the work item, trade and period of performance for each subcontract requirement. The offeror shall include in its narrative a plan to manage the subcontractor manning levels included in the proposed Availabilities.

(2) The Offeror shall provide current Progress/Manning Reports demonstrating the extent to which the Offeror is providing planned prime and subcontractor manpower resources necessary to complete current ship repair and construction projects. These reports should follow the format requested in the NSI 009-60. There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

(a) Provide all current Progress/Manning Reports in the form of CDRLs or equivalent data reports provided to your customer for current ship repair and construction projects.

“Current” is defined as a project in-progress or completed within the last three (3) months as of the date of the initial proposal due date for this procurement.

(b) Provide a completed solicitation Section J, Manpower Plan to Actual Data Sheet, (Attachment S-4).

(3) The Offeror shall provide three (3) Manpower Curves (Total) in accordance with NSI 009-60 that graphically delineate the resources tied to each individual ship availability in men-per-day.

All curves provided shall represent the full Availability period of performance, total manpower ceiling and shall show correlated manning values across all curves. Offeror shall include a data table providing the numerical data by trade that populates each curve. There is no page limit associated with this documentation. A curve shall be provided for each of the following and reflect the full Availability period of performance:

(a) The manpower curve (total) associated with the NSI 009-60 Initial IPS for the proposed

Availabilities. This chart shall show the total manpower resources currently employed by the offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror.

(b) The total manpower resources required to complete these proposed Availabilities plus work the Offeror currently has under contract during each Availability period of performance.

This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing each individual Availability. Each ship Availability shall be labeled by hull number. This chart shall show the total manpower resources currently employed by the offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror.

(c) The total manpower resources required to complete these proposed Availabilities plus work the Offeror currently has under contract during each Availability period of performance, plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements during each Availability period of performance. All projects included in the Manpower Utilization Data Sheet (Attachment S-1), shall be included in this curve. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual Availability. Each ship Availability shall be labeled by hull number. This chart shall show the total manpower resources currently employed by the Offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror.

(4) The Offeror shall provide Manpower Curves (Trade) in accordance with NSI 009-60 which graphically delineate the resources tied to each trade in men-per-day. All curves provided shall represent the full Availability period of performance and shall show correlated manning values across all curves for each ship. Offeror shall include a data table providing the numerical data by trade that populates each curve. The following trades shall be reflected in each curve: ship fitter, welder, inside machinist, outside machinist, electrician, pipe fitter, sheet metal, painter, carpenter, rigger, labor, other. There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

Curve(s) shall be provided for each ship and reflect the full Availability period of performance for each of the following:

(a) The manpower curve (trade) associated with the NSI 009-60 Initial IPS for the proposed

Availabilities.

(b) The trade manpower resources required to complete these proposed Availabilities plus work the Offeror currently has under contract during the Availability period of performance. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.

(c) The trade manpower resources required to complete these proposed Availabilities plus work the Offeror currently has under contract during the Availability period of performance, plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements during the Availability period of performance. All projects included in the Manpower Utilization Data Sheet (Attachment S-1) shall be included in this curve. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.

(d) Chart showing the available trade manpower resources currently employed by the Offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror during each ship’s Availability period of performance. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.

b) Subfactor B – Physical Resource Capacity

(1) The Offeror shall provide a narrative and a graphical representation (in the formant of the Pier and Dry-dock Graphical Representation Template (Attachment S-8) that demonstrates that the Offeror has the pier and dry-dock available to complete the requirements of the proposed Availabilities. The graphical representation shall show the pier and dry-dock expected to be in working capacity by month from proposal submission through each Availability period of performance, and the awarded and outstanding work utilizing those resources by month. The narrative shall not exceed 10 pages, and the narrative and graphical representation shall address the following:

(a) The pier and dry-dock required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract based on current contract schedule. Additionally, identify the total pier and dry-dock currently in working capacity, and expected to be in working capacity by month from proposal submission through each Availability period of performance.

(b) The pier and dry-dock required to complete all outstanding proposals, per proposed schedules. Identify the pier and dry-dock committed to previously awarded requirements, as well as the proposed use of resources to complete the work of ALL outstanding proposals (including this proposal).

(c) The pier and dry-dock required to complete any other anticipated requirements (including but not limited to non-navy work, pier and dry-dock upgrades or maintenance).

(d) Should the offeror propose to utilize subcontracted pier or dry-dock, the Offeror shall include an explanation of the requirements that will be sourced by the prime's facility and the pier and dry-dock that will be provided by the subcontractor.

(e) The Offeror's plan to resolve pier and dry-dock resource conflicts as a result of the award of other outstanding proposals. Pier and dry-dock shall not be committed to multiple ships during the same time period without reasonable explanation.

(f) In the event the Offeror proposes an interval of less than seven (7) days between the undocking date of other requirements and the proposed docking date of these Availabilities, and/or a proposed docking date within the first seven (7) days of the Availabilities, then the narrative shall detail the necessary steps to accomplish.

a) Subfactor C - Integrated Production Schedule (IPS)

(1) The Offeror shall provide documentation for each proposed Availability inclusive of the Initial

IPS elements of NAVSEA Standard Item 009-60. Offerors shall provide the documentation in accordance with format requirements of FY20 NAVSEA Standard Item 009-60. The offeror shall provide the reports in the electronic formats required by FY20 NAVSEA Standard Item 009-60 and in paper (hard copy) format. The hard copy of the Gantt charts shall be provided on 11 x 17 inch paper. Offerors shall integrate all work included in the work package. However, for the purposes of proposal submission only, reports do not require incorporation of Alteration Installation Team (AIT) schedules, Government-Contracted Third Party Maintenance Provider schedules, Ship's Force schedules, Commercial Industrial Services (CIS) schedules, Fleet Maintenance Activity (FMA) schedules and Navy Intermediate-Level schedules. There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

I. GENERAL

A. The Government intends to award a Fixed-Price contract for the completion of both the USS CHOSIN (CG 65) and USS CAPE ST GEORGE (CG 71) Modernization Period (MODPRD) to the offeror whose proposal represents the Best Value to the Government.

B. Offerors are advised that the Government intends to make award on the basis of initial proposals without conducting discussions with Offerors, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary (see paragraph (f)(4) of FAR 52.215-1). Therefore, each initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

C. Offerors are advised that the Government will not evaluate any proposal information not contained within the body of the proposal.

II. BASIS OF AWARD

A. The Government will select the best overall offer, based upon an assessment of non-price factors/subfactors and Cost/Price. A contract may be awarded to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with FAR 9.104, whose proposal conforms to the RFP’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and represents the best value to the Government utilizing trade-offs, in accordance with the evaluation criteria.

B. The best value basis for award will be based on the following evaluation factors:

1. Non- Price Factors

a) Factor 1: Eligibility Factor

b) Factor 2: Schedule & Resource Capacity

(2) Subfactor A: Manpower

(3) Subfactor B: Physical Resource Capacity

(4) Subfactor C: Integrated Product Schedule (IPS)

2. Cost/Price Factor

a) Factor 3: Price

C. A single overall rating will be applied to each factor as follows:

a) Non-price Factor 1 in terms of acceptable or non-acceptable

b) Non-Price Factor 2 in accordance with the adjectival ratings discussed in Section IV below.

D. The Navy will first evaluate Factor 1, Eligibility for acceptability. If an Offeror is found to be unacceptable for

Factor 1, then the Navy reserves the right to not conduct additional evaluation. Factor 2 is approximately equal in importance to Factor 3. Under Factor 2, Subfactors A, B and C are approximately equal in importance. In this connection, overall technical merit; however, the importance of price as an evaluation factor will increase as the difference in overall technical merit (Factor 2, Schedule & Resource Capacity) among competing proposals decreases. This may result in an award to a higher rated, higher priced offeror, where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors, and the Source Selection Authority (SSA) determines that the benefits associated with award to the higher price offeror outweigh the difference in price. The SSA will base the source selection decision on an assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation.

III. EVALUATION FACTOR DESCRIPTIONS

A. Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor:

The objective of this factor is to:

1. Assess whether, upon receipt of proposals, the offeror holds, or has applied for and will hold by time of award, a Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA) or MSRA Equivalency through NAVSEA 02, has ownership or committed access to a pier capable of berthing the vessel, and has ownership or committed access to a dry-dock capable of docking the vessel, in accordance with Section L.

2. Assess if the proposed dry-dock is certified and will remain certified during the required period of performance; and should the dry-dock certification lapse anytime during the proposed docking period, the offeror has adequately described a plan for recertification.

B. Factor 2 - Schedule & Resource Capacity:

Basis of Evaluation - The objective of this factor is to evaluate the offeror's response to the Section L requirements for this factor, as follows:

1. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor A, Manpower to:

a) Assess the extent to which the offeror’s narrative demonstrates a detailed, substantiated and complete understanding of how the offeror will provide the manpower resources to successfully complete each Availability’s requirements as proposed, accounting for the offeror’s current manpower resourcing performance. In addition, assess the extent to which the offeror’s narrative regarding utilization of overtime, hiring additional personnel and utilization of subcontractors is supported by current manning performance and narrative.

b) Assess the extent to which the Offeror's completed Manpower Plan to Actual Data Sheet (Attachment S-4) and associated CDRLs or equivalent reports correlate with the narrative in Factor 2, Subfactor A (1).

c) Assess the extent to which the offeror’s proposed manpower curves (total) demonstrate a detailed, substantiated and complete understanding of how the offeror will provide the manpower resources to successfully complete each Availability’s requirements and all existing and proposed work. The Government will assess these curves in relation to the narrative provided in Factor 2, Subfactor A (1).

Emphasis will be placed on how the offeror plans to deconflict anticipated manning shortfalls.

d) Assess the extent to which the offeror’s proposed manpower curves (trade) demonstrate a detailed, substantiated and complete understanding of how the offeror will provide the trade manpower resources to successfully complete each Availability’s requirements and all existing and proposed work. The Government will assess these curves in relation to the narrative provided in Factor 2, Subfactor A (1). Emphasis will be placed on how the offeror plans to deconflict anticipated trade manning shortfalls.

2. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor B, Physical Resource Capacity to:

a) Assess the extent to which the offeror’s narrative and graphical representation demonstrates that the Offeror's capability to provide the required physical resources to complete the Availabilities. An emphasis will be placed on how the offeror plans to deconflict anticipated physical resource conflicts.

3. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor C, Integrated Product Schedule for:

a) Understanding of scope and integration of the work items in the Work Item Specification Package

(Attachment J-1 and Attachment J-11)

b) Identifying the critical path and logically sequencing work items, and

c) Integrating the milestones and key events in the Execution Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3 and Attachment J-13) reasonably.

C. Factor 3 - Price

1. The Government will analyze price proposals in accordance with FAR 15.404 using the information contained in the Pricing Workbooks (Attachment J-4 and Attachment J-14). Although award will be made based on an offeror’s total price, a price proposal that is found unreasonable and/or unbalanced may be rejected. Reasonableness will be determined based on proposals submitted in accordance with FAR

15.404. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. The Government may reject an offer if the Contracting Officer determines the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government. The Government will review the offeror’s CLIN and Work Item prices for the availabilities to identify any significant disparities that may indicate a lack of understanding of contract requirements.

2. Total evaluated price for the availabilities shall be calculated by adding:

a) The price of the basic contract line item numbers (CLIN) (this amount shall match the total price of all work items),

b) The price of all option CLINs,

c) The price of all Growth Reservation CLINS (Base and Option),

d) The price of the Extension Day Rates and Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rates & Material Burden

Rates for New Work

e) If applicable, the Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price Schedule Acceleration adjustments, and

f) As applicable, the value of the inter-port differentials (as identified in Section L of this solicitation)

3. Evaluated price for Growth Reservation CLINs, Extension day price, Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor

Rates & Material Burden Rates, and New Work shall be calculated in the following manner:

a) Growth Reservation CLINs (Base and Option)

(1) Multiply the proposed fully burdened ship repair labor rate by the number of hours associated with the specific Growth Reservation CLIN to yield the labor hour price for that CLIN.

(2) Multiply the material burden rate proposed by the dollar value of material associated with the specific Growth Reservation CLIN to yield the burdened material price for that CLIN.

(3) Add the sum of labor hour and material dollar price to find the total price for each Growth

Reservation CLIN.

b) Extension Day Price

(1) Multiply the proposed daily rate by the number of days associated with that rate (for each extension type) to yield the evaluated price for that daily extension type.

c) New Work Price

(1) Multiply the proposed fully burdened ship repair labor rate by the number of hours associated with the specific New Work labor hours to yield the total labor price for New Work.

(2) Multiply the material burden rate proposed by the dollar value of material dollars associated with

New Work to yield the burdened material price for New Work.

(3) Add the sum of labor hour and material dollar price to calculate New Work Price.

4. Offerors are advised that the number of Extension days as well as the number of labor hours and the material dollar value used to calculate the Extension Day Price and the New Work Price are for evaluation purposes only.

5. Subcontracting Plan, For large businesses only: Assess the plan for:

a) Compliance with FAR clause 19.704; subcontracting goals identified in Section L, V.A.4.b; and FAR 52.219-9 to include all subparagraphs in FAR 52.219-9(d).

b) Adequate rationale for any proposed goals that are lower than the goals identified in Section L, V A.4.b.

6. Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price (VATEP) Schedule Acceleration (USS CHOSIN CG 65 and USS CAPE ST GEORGE CG 71 MODPRDs)

a) VATEP will be used to reduce the offerors proposed price to determine the Total Evaluated Price

(TEP). Any adjustment will be incorporated in the resultant contract via Section F and the applicable Milestones and Key Events, (Attachment J-3 and Attachment J-13).

7. Inter-port Differential

a) Each inter-port differential, applicable to the USS CHOSIN CG 65 and USS CAPE ST GEORGE CG

71, must be included in all offers and is calculated using foreseeable costs for fuel, towing and pilot charges, and travel to the contractor’s facility by applicable Government personnel. The IPD charts in Section L provide the values to be included in all offerors’ price proposals to determine the offeror’s total evaluated price. Additionally, the Navy has included an Inter-port Differential Reduction for “Days Completed Early.”

IV. EVALUATION FACTOR RATINGS

The ratings will be based on what is contained in or referenced in the proposal, not on information obtained from other sources. The ratings are set as follows:

A. Factor 1

1. For Factor 1, the rating reflects whether the information submitted in response to Factor 1 meets or does not meet the minimum requirements through an assessment of the proposal. The evaluation will identify any deficiencies in offeror’s proposals. The ratings for Factor 1 are as follows:

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

B. Factor 2

1. For Factor 2, the Offeror’s technical (non-price) proposal shall be evaluated using the adjectival ratings defined as follows:

Rating Description

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

C. Definitions:

1. Best Value means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement. See FAR 2.101.

2. Competitive Range - See FAR 15.306(c).

3. Discussions are exchanges (i.e., negotiations) in a competitive environment that are undertaken with the intent of allowing the offeror to revise its proposal. Discussions take place after establishment of the competitive range. See FAR 15.306(d).

4. Strength is an aspect of an offeror's proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

5. Weakness means a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See

FAR 15.001.

6. Significant Weakness means a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

7. Deficiency is a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

8. Risk, as it pertains to source selection, is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an offeror’s proposed approach to achieving the technical factor or Subfactor may involve risk of disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

9. Clarifications are limited exchanges, between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated.

(End of Summary of Changes)