N00024-18-R-4448_Amendment_011.pdf

N0002418NR93107

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment to solicitation N00024-18-R-4448 is to 1) Update Section J to add Attachment S-1 Manpow er Utilization Data Sheet and Attachment S-2 Dry-Dock Utilization Data Sheet and to retract Errata and Addendum issued under Amendment 010; 2) Revise Section L and Section M language. Accordingly, said solicitation is modif ied as follow s:

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 17

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 05-Oct-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N0002418R4448

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

27-Jul-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

05-Oct-2018

CODE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DC 20376-2030

N00024 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0002418R4448

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The following have been deleted:

AMENDMENT 10

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

DOCUMENTS/EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) form a part of this solicitation:

No. Document

Attachment S-1 Manpower Utilization Data Sheet (Amendment 011) Attachment S-2 Dry-Dock Utilization Data Sheet (Amendment 011) Attachment S-3 Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Form Attachment S-4 Reserved Attachment S-5 Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) also form a part of this solicitation and will form a part of the resulting contracts from this solicitation:

No. Document

DDG 51 FY19 DSRA

Attachment J-1 Specification Package No. (Addendum 1, Errata 1, Errata 2, Errata 3, Errata 4, Errata 5) Attachment J-2 Work Item Plans, Drawings, and Other References (Addendum 1, Errata 1, Errata 2, Errata 3, Errata 4, Errata 5) Attachment J-3 Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates (Amendment 0002 and Amendment

0009) Attachment J-4 Pricing Workbook (Amendment 0004) Attachment J-5 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan Attachment J-6 Subcontracting Plan (to be incorporated upon award) Attachment J-7 Schedule Model Review

DDG 84 FY19 DMP

Attachment J-8 Specification Package No. (Addendum 1, Errata 1, Errata 2) Attachment J-9 Work Item Plans, Drawings, and Other References (Addendum 1, Errata 1, Errata 2) Attachment J-10 Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates (Amendment 0009) Attachment J-11 Pricing Workbook (Amendment 0002 and Amendment 0005) Attachment J-12 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan Attachment J-13 Subcontracting Plan (to be incorporated upon award) Attachment J-14 Schedule Model Review

LSD 44 FY19 DSRA

Attachment J-15 Specification Package No. (Addendum 1, Errata 1, Errata 2, Errata 3, Errata 4) Attachment J-16 Work Item Plans, Drawings, and Other References (Addendum 1, Errata 1, Errata 2, Errata 3, Errata 4) Attachment J-17 Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates (Amendment 0002 and Amendment

0009) Attachment J-18 Pricing Workbook (Amendment 0002) Attachment J-19 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan Attachment J-20 Subcontracting Plan (to be incorporated upon award) Attachment J-21 Schedule Model Review

Exhibit A Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) A001-A003; A005-A009; A011; A012; A014 (Does not include A004, A0010, or A0013) Exhibit B Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) B001-B009 Exhibit C Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) C001-C002

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This solicitation is a Request for Proposals (RFP) that will result in the award of three separate Fixed-Price contracts, each to complete one of the following three Chief of Naval Operations (CNO)-scheduled depot availabilities planned for fiscal year 2019 (FY19):

USS ARLEIGH BURKE (DDG 51) Dry-Docking Selected Restricted Availability (DSRA) USS BULKELEY (DDG 84) Depot Modernization Period (DMP) USS GUNSTON HALL (LSD 44) Dry-Docking Selected Restricted Availability (DSRA)

The following availability’s competition is restricted to offerors within the Norfolk, VA homeport:

USS ARLEIGH BURKE (DDG 51) Dry-Docking Selected Restricted Availability (DSRA)

The following availabilities shall be competed on a coast-wide basis (East and Gulf coasts):

The Government intends to award three separate Fixed-Price contracts to the offeror(s) whose collective proposals represent the Best Value to the Government for all three Availabilities, after evaluation in accordance with Section M of this solicitation.

ALL INQUIRIES shall be made in writing and directed to Jamillah Powell, Contracting Officer, and Randolph Cook, Contract Specialist, at jamillah.powell@navy.mil, and randolph.cook@navy.mil. To ensure the Government is able to adequately address and respond to offeror pre-proposal information (PPI) via amendment, it is requested questions be submitted no later than 28 Sep 2018 at 3:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. The Navy reserves the right to not answer any requests received after this date and time. Furthermore, offerors should note that the proposal due date will not be extended solely on the basis of requests received after this date and time. RFIs should reference a solicitation and/or specification page and paragraph number and be submitted on the Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) form (Attachment S-3) provided with this solicitation.

Estimated Award Date: The Government anticipates making three (3) single awards on or around 21 December 2018. Offerors must provide a period of at least 120 calendar days from the proposal due date for Government acceptance of the offer (Complete block 12 of the Standard Form (SF) 33).

2.0 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

Proposal Due Date: All copies of proposals (Volumes I & II) shall be received by the Government at the address below no later than 19 October 2018 at 3:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. Electronic submittal of proposals will not be accepted. Late proposals WILL NOT be considered. Partial proposals or attachments submitted late WILL NOT be considered. Offerors are advised to consult FAR 15.208 related to timely receipt of proposals.

Proposal Submission:

Proposals shall be sent to:

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND

Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center (MARMC) Attn: Billy Gartman Building 51, Code 420 Norfolk Naval Shipyard Portsmouth, VA 23709

Offerors shall mark all submittals “DO NOT OPEN PACKAGE IN MAIL ROOM—FORWARD UNOPENED DIRECTLY TO C-450”. The outside of the package shall clearly indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the contents of the package.

Offerors shall submit the following for each Availability under each proposed Execution Scenario:

Volume Title Number of Paper Originals (See Note 1)

Number of Paper Copies

Number of CDs (See Notes 2 &3)

I Price Proposal 1 1 2 II Technical Proposal 1 4 4

Note 1: Originals may be shipped in the same boxes as the copies to eliminate excess shipping costs. However, originals should be separately wrapped inside the container, and clearly labeled “ORIGINAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL” or “ORIGINAL PRICE PROPOSAL.” The exterior of each box MUST clearly indicate its contents.

Note 2: The CDs must be scanned to ensure that the files contained on them do not contain any computer viruses.

The CDs shall be labeled to indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the associated volume numbers.

Note 3: The files on the CD shall be in a format that is compatible with and capable of being opened in the most current Microsoft Office Suite or Adobe Acrobat. The material presented in electronic format shall be identical to the paper copy of the proposal. In cases where the hard copy and the electronic copy of the proposal conflict, the hard copy shall take precedence. All spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format such that each mathematical equation is obvious. No fields shall be password protected. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.

3.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

Ship Checks:

The USS ARLEIGH BURKE (DDG 51) will be available for a ship check in support of the DDG51 FY19 DSRA prior to the proposal submission due date. Offerors, including significant subcontractors, may inspect the USS ARLEIGH BURKE (DDG 51) on or before 24 August 2018. Please note: These dates are subject to last minute change.

The USS BAINBRIDGE (DDG 96) will be available for a ship check in support of the DDG84 FY19 DMP prior to the proposal submission due date. Offerors, including significant subcontractors, may inspect the USS BAINBRIDGE (DDG 96) between 20 August 2018 and 21 September 2018. Please note: These dates are subject to last minute change.

The USS WHIDBEY ISLAND (LSD 41) will be available for a ship check in support of the LSD44 FY19 DSRA prior to the proposal submission due date. Offerors, including significant subcontractors, may inspect the USS WHIDBEY ISLAND (LSD 41) upon request. Please note: These dates are subject to last minute change.

To schedule a ship check, offerors shall email a "Request for Ship Check" to Jamillah Powell and Randolph Cook at jamillah.powell@navy.mil and randolph.cook@navy.mil, respectively.

Participants will be subject to security, safety, and other applicable regulations established by Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center (MARMC) and ship’s Commanding Officers. Contractors conducting MARMC related work efforts must visit MARMC security website for latest forms and instructions at:

http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/RMC/MARMC/Visitor-Information/ https://www.cnic.navy.mil/regions/cnrma/installations/ns_norfolk/om/pass_and_id.html

Specifications and associated reference documentation: The Government will provide, upon request, CD/DVDs including the Specification Package Work Items (Attachment J-1, J-8 and J-15) and Work Item References (Attachment J-2, J-9, and J-16)

Offerors may request a CD/DVD by submitting a request to:

Jamillah Powell at Jamillah.powell@navy.mil and Randolph Cook at randolph.cook@navy.mil

Prior to the due date for submission of proposals, the government may provide addendums and errata to the specifications and associated reference documentation. The Government intends to provide this additional data via links to AMRDEC SAFE. It is an offeror’s responsibility to ensure it is accessing the AMRDEC SAFE website to retrieve addendums and errata for this solicitation.

Additional work item references not already in the possession of the offerors, commercially available, listed under 52.211-2, are available through the following websites:

https://jedmics.net/ https://webjed.nnsy.navy.mil/ https://psjed.psns.navy.mil/

Alteration of Solicitation: Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

Proposal Information: Offerors shall not presume the Government has knowledge outside of information provided in the proposal. Additionally, offerors are advised that statements such as: “the offeror understands”, “the offeror has a long history of outstanding support”, “standard procedures shall be used”, “well known techniques shall be employed”, or any paraphrasing of the solicitation, shall be considered inadequate to demonstrate experience, knowledge of, or compliance with solicitation requirements. Offerors are encouraged to provide specific and concise information to validate all assertions.

Amendments: The Government may revise the solicitation at any time by means of an Amendment. It is an offeror’s responsibility to ensure it is accessing the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website to view potential amendments and procurement notifications for this solicitation.

Teaming Arrangements: Proposals must be submitted by one (1) prime contractor. An Offeror may be listed as a subcontractor in multiple proposals but may only submit one (1) proposal in accordance with the execution scenario as a prime contractor with a unique Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code and Taxpayer Identification Number. To be evaluated as a Joint Venture (JV), offerors must provide a notarized agreement (with the price proposal) delineating roles and responsibilities for all proposed work.

4.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT

To facilitate efficiency and consistency in proposal evaluation the following is mandatory. PROPOSALS WHICH

DO NOT FOLLOW THIS DIRECTION MAY BE REJECTED AS NON-RESPONSIVE AND THUS

INELIGIBLE FOR AWARD.

Hard Copy Proposals: All pages shall be double-sided on 8.5 x 11 inch paper with a one-inch margin. The text used shall be Times New Roman with a minimum font size of 12-point. Each side of the page will count as one “page”.

Any type contained on graphics pages will not be smaller than 10-point font. Any pages that may be revised as a result of discussions (if required) shall contain revision numbers and date of the proposal revision submission.

Offerors shall use the attachments provided with this solicitation for their proposal content as specified in Section

5.0 where required.

Page Limits:

The cover letter is limited to five (5) pages.

There are no other page limitations.

5.0 PROPOSAL CONTENT

VOLUME I

Offerors within the Norfolk, VA homeport

IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED RESPONSIVE TO THE SOLICITATION, OFFERORS WITHIN THE

NORFOLK, VA HOMEPORT THAT INTEND TO PROPOSE TO COMPLETE ONE OR MORE

AVAILABILITIES UNDER THIS SOLICITATION MUST SUBMIT PROPOSALS TO COMPLETE ALL

OF THE FOLLOWING EXECUTION SCENARIOS, IF SUPPORTED BY THE OFFERORS’

AVAILABLE PIER & DOCK FACILITIES:

Execution Scenario 1: Each Availability individually that could be completed using the offerors’ available pier and dock facilities. Offerors shall assume that one and only one of the availabilities would be awarded to an individual offeror under this scenario.

Execution Scenario 2: Both the DDG51 and DDG84 availabilities together, utilizing concurrent “double” docking, if supported by the offerors’ available pier & dock facilities. Offerors shall assume that two and only two availabilities would be awarded to an individual offeror under this scenario.

Execution Scenario 3: Two availabilities together, utilizing multiple dry-docks, if supported by the offerors’ available pier & dock facilities. Offerors may not propose execution approaches to sequentially complete the dry-docking requirements within a single dry-dock. Offerors shall assume that two and only two availabilities would be awarded to an individual offeror under this scenario.

a. DDG84 FY19 DMP and LSD44 FY19 DSRA

b. DDG51 FY19 DSRA and LSD44 FY19 DSRA

c. DDG51 FY19 DSRA and DDG84 FY19 DMP

Offerors outside the Norfolk, VA homeport

Offerors outside the Norfolk, VA homeport may not propose for the DDG51 FY19 DSRA.

IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED RESPONSIVE TO THE SOLICITATION OFFERORS OUTSIDE THE

NORFOLK, VA HOMEPORT THAT INTEND TO PROPOSE TO COMPLETE ONE OR MORE

AVAILABILITIES UNDER THIS SOLICITATION MUST SUBMIT PROPOSALS TO COMPLETE THE

FOLLOWING EXECUTION SCENARIOS, IF SUPPORTED BY THE OFFERORS’ AVAILABLE PIER &

DOCK FACILITIES:

Execution Scenario 1: DDG84 and LSD44 availabilities individually, if supported by the offerors’ available pier and dock facilities. Offerors shall assume that one and only one of the availabilities would be awarded to an individual offeror under this scenario.

Execution Scenario 2: Two availabilities together, utilizing multiple dry-docks, if supported by the offerors’ available pier & dock facilities. Offerors may not propose execution approaches to sequentially complete the dry-docking requirements within a single dry-dock. Offerors shall assume that two and only two availabilities would be awarded to an individual offeror under this scenario.

a. DDG84 FY19 DMP and LSD44 FY19 DSRA

Offerors shall label each availability proposal in order to clearly indicate which execution scenario is proposed.

Price Proposal: The price proposal shall not contain non-price factor information. The price proposal for each Availability proposed under each Execution Scenario shall be comprised of the following documentation:

a. Price Proposal: The price proposal shall not contain non-price factor information. The price proposal shall be comprised of the following documentation:

b. Cover Letter,

c. Signed SF 33 with all amendments acknowledged,

d. Small Business Subcontracting plan per FAR Part 19 (large businesses only),

e. Any Joint Venture / teaming agreements (if applicable),

f. Completed Section B carrying forward information from the Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4, J-11 and

J-18), and

g. Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Daily Extension Rates, IPD Reduction for

Day Completed Early, and Labor & Material Burden New Work Rates & Growth Reservation (Attachment J-4, J-11 and J-18)

Cover Letter: The cover letter, which shall not exceed five (5) pages, shall meet all the requirements of the “first page of the proposal” outlined in FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)(i-v). In addition to those requirements, the offeror shall include the following in the cover letter:

Identification of all enclosures included with the proposal, CAGE and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers for the Prime contractor, Notice of any alterations to the solicitation, such as “fill-in” blocks and certifications.

Notice of any alterations to the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications).

In order to demonstrate responsiveness to the requirements of this solicitation, offerors shall answer the following questions:

o Affirmatively state whether or not the Offeror has ownership of, or committed access to, NAVSEA certified dry-dock(s) capable of dry-docking the LSD44. If yes:

Provide the name of dry-dock(s) Affirmatively state whether the dock(s) are available to bid this solicitation. If the offeror states that a dock is not available, provide the details of the awarded contract or dry-dock maintenance period that has made the dock unavailable (Customer, Contract Number, Vessel (if applicable), Dry-Dock Period of Performance, Scheduled Dry-Dock Maintenance Period) o Affirmatively state whether or not the Offeror has ownership of, or committed access to, NAVSEA certified dry-dock(s) capable of dry-docking the DDG51. If yes:

Provide the name of dry-dock(s) Affirmatively state whether the dock(s) are available to bid this solicitation. If the offeror states that a dock is not available, provide the details of the awarded contract that has made the dock unavailable (Customer, Contract Number, Vessel (if applicable), Dry-Dock Period of Performance) o Affirmatively state whether or not the Offeror has ownership of, or committed access to, NAVSEA certified dry-dock(s) capable of dry-docking the DDG84. If yes:

Provide the name of dry-dock(s) Affirmatively state whether the dock(s) are available to bid this solicitation. If the offeror states that a dock is not available, provide the details of the awarded contract that has made the dock unavailable (Customer, Contract Number, Vessel (if applicable), Dry-Dock Period of Performance) o Affirmatively state whether or not the Offeror has ownership of, or committed access to, NAVSEA certified dry-dock(s) capable of “double” dry-docking the DDG51 and DDG84 concurrently. If yes:

Provide the name of dry-dock(s)

Affirmatively state whether the dock(s) are available to bid this solicitation. If the offeror states that a dock is not available, provide the details of the awarded contract that has made the dock unavailable (Customer, Contract Number, Vessel (if applicable), Dry-Dock Period of Performance)

Identify the execution scenario under which the Availability is proposed (Execution Scenario 1, Execution Scenario 2, etc.)

Name, address, and telephone number of each proposed first-tier subcontractor with a proposed subcontract estimated at $10 million or more.

For any WI with a total dollar value of zero dollars proposed in Attachment J-4, J-11 and J-18, provide an explanation as to why. In addition, if applicable:

- For any WI with a total value of zero labor hours proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although material is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

- For any WI with a total dollar value of zero material proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although labor is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

Standard Form 33 (SF 33): As part of the price proposal package, the offeror shall submit the completed SF 33 with blocks 12 through 18 completed, as well as all sections with applicable “fill-ins” filled in and shall acknowledge all amendments. The representative who signs this form must be authorized to contractually bind the company providing the offer. Section B CLIN pricing must also be completed for ALL APPLICABLE CLINs. The Offeror shall complete and provide all Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements included in Section K of the solicitation. Submission of a signed offer to the Government constitutes agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions of the solicitation in a FFP contracting environment.

Subcontracting Plan: A subcontracting plan is NOT REQUIRED from a small business concern.

Provide rationale for any proposed goals that are lower than the statutory requirements identified at https://www.sba.gov/contracting/contracting-officials/goaling.

Address FAR 52.219-9 and all of the subparagraphs in FAR 52.219-9(d):

subparagraphs (12), (13), (14) and (15).

Completed Section B and Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4, J-11 and J-18): Offerors must propose on all applicable contract line items (CLINs), complete the note entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)” in Section B, complete the note entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: DAILY RATES FOR PIER SIDE AND DRY-DOCKING (FULLY BURDENED)” in Section B, complete the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Daily Extension Rates, IPD Reduction for Day Completed Early, and Labor & Material Burden New Work Rates & Growth Reservation (Attachment J-4, J-11 and J-18) to be considered responsive.

The contractor must submit prices for the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Daily Extension Rates, IPD Reduction for Day Completed Early, and Labor & Material Burden New Work Rates & Growth Reservation (Attachment J-4, J-11 and J-18) in Microsoft Excel in the format provided in this solicitation.

The breakdown of CLIN prices, corresponding to the work item pricing, must add up to the total of each CLIN. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the CLIN price shall govern. The Labor & Material Burden Rates must match the rates provided in the Section B note entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)”. The Daily Burden Rates must match the rates provided in the Section B note entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: DAILY RATES FOR PIER SIDE AND DRY-DOCKING (FULLY BURDENED)”. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the Section B clause rates shall govern.

For Attachment J-4, J-11 and J-18, offerors are to insert pricing in all yellow shaded fields.

Inter-port Differential

The inter-port differential, applicable to the DDG84 FY19 DMP, must be included in all offers and is calculated using foreseeable costs for fuel, towing and pilot charges, and travel to the contractor’s facility by applicable Government personnel. The following chart provides the values to be included in all offerors’ price proposals to determine the offeror’s total evaluated price. Additionally, the Navy has included an Inter-port Differential Reduction for “Days Completed Early” as proposed in Attachment J-10.

Location* Differential Inter-port Differential Reduction for “Days Completed Early” stated in Attachment J-10

Pascagoula, MS $4,545,013 -$14,011 Mayport, FL $4,636,544 -$16,388 Norfolk, VA $327,026 -$3,530

The inter-port differential, applicable to the LSD44 FY19 DSRA, must be included in all offers and is calculated using foreseeable costs for fuel, towing and pilot charges, and travel to the contractor’s facility by applicable Government personnel. The following chart provides the values to be included in all offerors’ price proposals to determine the offeror’s total evaluated price. Additionally, the Navy has included an Inter-port Differential Reduction for “Days Completed Early” as proposed in Attachment J-17:

Attachment J-17

Pascagoula, MS $4,412,082 -$5,735 Mayport, FL $4,105,186 -$1,158 Norfolk, VA $61,753 - $129

No inter-port differential is applicable to the DDG51 FY19 DSRA, as the completion of that Availability is restricted to competitors within its homeport in Norfolk, VA.

Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price Tradeoff (VATEP) Schedule Adjustment The Navy would obtain additional value, in terms of additional Operational Availability, should any one of these two Availabilities complete early to its no-later-than completion date. Therefore, the Navy has included a VATEP price adjustment to incorporate this additional value into its price evaluation.

The VATEP schedule adjustment, applicable to the DDG51 FY19 DSRA, shall be calculated by multiplying “Days Completed Early” value found in Attachment J-3 by the VATEP schedule adjustment factor, which is -$133,640 per day.

The VATEP schedule adjustment applicable to the DDG84 FY19 DMP, shall be calculated by multiplying “Days Completed Early” value found in Attachment J-10 by the VATEP schedule adjustment factor, which is -$133,640 per day.

The VATEP schedule adjustment applicable to the LSD44 FY19 DSRA shall be calculated by multiplying “Days Completed Early” value found in Attachment J-17 by the VATEP schedule adjustment factor, which is -$67,134 per day.

009-72 Supporting Price Information: As part of the Price proposal package, the offeror shall submit other than cost and pricing information sufficient for the Contracting Office to validate the offerors price associated with completing the requirements of 009-72. This other than cost and pricing data shall include both a narrative description, including the basis of all labor and, material estimates and a quantitative and traceable price estimate by cost element to complete these requirements.

VOLUME II

Non-Price Proposal: The non-price proposal shall be comprised of four factors, as follows:

Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor: Offerors must provide the following to demonstrate eligibility for each Availability proposed under each Execution Scenario:

Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet (Attachment S-5) with the top portion filled out.

A letter signed by the Principal identifying and confirming ownership or committed access (in the form of a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access) to a pier capable of berthing, and a dry dock capable of docking, the vessel(s) proposed at time of contract award. Evidence must be provided to prove the dry dock will remain certified throughout the entire proposed use of the dry dock in performance of this contract.

Evidence the offeror holds a Master Ship Repair Agreement or proof of MSRA Equivalency to demonstrate capability.

MSRA Equivalency (Applicable to Non-MSRA holders only): Offerors that do not hold an MSRA must submit MSRA equivalency documentation to demonstrate sufficient organization and facilities capabilities. (Specific documentation requirements provided upon inspection request).

To be eligible for award, a prospective contractor must possess a MSRA as described in DFARS 217.71 Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels (MARAV) or demonstrate organization and facilities equivalent to that reflected in a MSRA. Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of a MSRA must contact the PCO to schedule an on-site inspection. All requests for MSRA equivalency inspections must be received by 1300, local time, Washington DC on 8 August 2018. Requests shall be sent to Jamillah Powell at jamillah.powell@navy.mil and Randolph Cook at randolph.cook@navy.mil. Failure to request an inspection by the designated time may result in a negative determination of offeror eligibility. All inspections will be completed by a representative from Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center (CNRMC). All offerors requesting equivalency inspections will receive a copy of the final inspection report prior to the date of contract award. The on-site inspection will supplement documentation provided with the offeror’s proposal.

The Government reserves the right to conduct a pre-award survey or to require other evidence of technical, production, managerial, financial, and similar abilities to perform prior to the award of any proposed contracts;

regardless of whether the offeror has an existing MSRA. There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

Factor 2 – Schedule & Resource Capacity: For each Availability proposed under each Execution Scenario, Offerors shall provide:

Integrated Production Schedule (IPS) documentation for the proposed Availability inclusive of the “Initial IPS” elements of NAVSEA Standard Item 009-60 as well as the Manpower Curves (Total) and the Manpower Curves (Trades) associated with the 009-60 “Schedule of Record”. Offerors shall provide the documentation in accordance with format requirements of FY19 (CH-2) NAVSEA Standard Item 009-60. The offeror shall provide the reports in the electronic formats required by FY19 (CH-2) 009-60 and in paper (hard copy) format. The hard copy of the Gantt charts shall be provided on 11 x 17 inch paper. There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

Offerors shall integrate all work included in the Work Package. However, for the purposes of proposal submission only, reports do not require incorporation of Alteration Installation Team (AIT) schedules, Government-Contracted Third Party Maintenance Provider schedules, Ship's Force schedules, Commercial Industrial Services (CIS) schedules, Fleet Maintenance Activity (FMA) schedules and Navy Intermediate-Level schedules.

Offerors shall demonstrate, with both manpower curves and a narrative, that the offeror has the manpower resources, by craft/trade/supervisor/support, available to complete the requirements of the availabilities included in the proposed execution scenario, accounting for manpower resources required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract, manpower resource plans to complete outstanding proposals, and the manpower resource plans required to complete any other known requirements during the execution scenario period of performance.

Manpower Curves (Total) and Manpower Curves (Trade) – In addition to the requirements of 009-60, the offerors shall provide Total and Trade Manpower Curves. Manpower curves (Total) and Manpower Curves (Trade) shall graphically delineate the resources dedicated to each individual ship availability, including the following information:

The total manpower resources and trade manpower resources currently employed by the offeror and expected to be employed by the offeror during the execution scenario period of performance.

The total manpower resources and trade manpower resources required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract during the execution scenario period of performance.

The total manpower resources and trade manpower resources required to complete work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other expected requirements during the execution scenario period of performance.

Completed Manpower Utilization Data Sheet (Attachment S-1)

Should the offeror propose to utilize overtime, the offeror shall include in their narrative an execution plan demonstrating how the offeror expects to manage and provide the overtime associated with Availabilities included in the proposed execution scenario.

Should the offeror propose to hire additional personnel, the offeror shall include in their narrative an execution plan demonstrating how the offeror expects to manage and provide the additional personnel associated with Availabilities included in the proposed execution scenario.

Should the offeror propose to utilize subcontracted resources, the offeror shall include in their narrative an explanation of the requirements that will be completed by the prime and the work that will be subcontracted, including the work item, trade and period of performance for each subcontract requirement.

Furthermore, the offeror shall include in their narrative an execution plan demonstrating how the offeror expects to manage the subcontractor percentages associated with Availabilities included in the proposed execution scenario.

Physical Resource Capacity- Offerors shall demonstrate, by completing Dry-Dock Utilization Data Sheet (Attachment S-2) and providing a narrative, that the offeror has the physical resources, available to complete the requirements of the availabilities included in the proposed execution scenario, accounting for physical resources required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract, physical resource plans to complete outstanding proposals, and the physical resource plans required to complete any other known requirements during the execution scenario period of performance. The offerors shall provide the following information to support the proposed requirement:

The total physical resources currently in working capacity and expected to be in working capacity during the execution scenario period of performance.

The total physical resources committed to complete previously awarded requirements as well as the additional resources committed to complete the work of ALL outstanding proposals expected during the execution scenario period of performance.

Should the offeror propose to utilize subcontracted resources, the offer shall include in their narrative an explanation of the requirements that will be sourced by the prime’s facility and the physical resources that will be provided by the subcontractor.

There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

Factor 3 – Transit and Dry-docking Capability: For each Availability proposed under each Execution Scenario, Offerors must provide the following documentation to demonstrate the contractor’s ability to safely and satisfactorily transit the vessel to the contractor’s facility, dry-dock the vessel, and execute the Availability’s required work. The information provided will be reviewed for compliance with the requirements provided in the following references. There are no page limitations associated with this documentation.

References

1. Work Package TPPC-LSD44-MARMCN19-CN01

2. Work Package TPPC-DDG51-MARMCN19-CN01

3. Work Package TPPC-DDG84-MARMCN19-CN01

4. Naval Ships Technical Manual (NSTM) Chapter 079 Damage Control, Stability and Buoyancy

Provide a narrative report demonstrating the contractor’s ability to safely and satisfactorily transit the vessel(s) to the contractor’s facility, dock the vessel(s) in accordance with references 1-4, as applicable, and execute the availability’s work package requirements while in dock. Narrative report shall include:

1. Contractor’s drydock certification certificate

2. Description of the drydocking facility to be used. This information shall include as a minimum principal dimensions, depth of water, tide or current conditions, rated capacity, major maintenance since last NAVSEA Maintenance Audit, the electric power system (including services to the ship), the fire protection system (including fire alarms and locations), the drainage and dewatering pumping systems, the sanitary drainage system serving the ship, and if a floating drydock, the mooring system, date of the last drydocking of the dock and any limitation in dock loading, rate of flooding or dewatering, block location, and ship displacement or trim.

3. Drydocking procedure. The procedure shall include operating practices, safety and security plans, special precautions or actions that are required by the characteristics of the dock or the ship such as tide restrictions, pumping and flooding schedule on floating drydocks and specific list, trim, and stability requirements of the ship during docking and undocking.

4. Plan to provide, set, and align the blocks in accordance with the correct docking position number. Should the Contractor propose any deviation from Final Docking Drawing, submit:

o Scaled drawing (a print of the vessel’s Final Docking Drawing marked up in red or a new drawing similar to the vessel’s Final Docking Drawing to a scale of 1/16-inch minimum, 1/8-inch maximum). The use of haul, fixed, universal, or fitted blocks and the type of drydock in which the ship will be docked shall be clearly stated.

o Supporting data substantiating that the block loading pressures are limited to a maximum of 20 long tons per square foot, that the number, distance from centerline, and square footage of side blocks per side is sufficient to resist overturning moments by providing at least the minimum number specified by the vessel’s Final Docking Drawing and that at least 90 percent of blocks land on longitudinal strength members or main transverse bulkheads.

5. Required condition of the ship prior to docking, including all stability data including list, trim, strength, and stability calculations. Provide a list of all assumptions made to support the calculations, including tank soundings.

6. Pumping plan for the docking and undocking of the vessel, including the information provided for in the sample pumping plan of Appendix D of MIL-STD-1625 of the ship loading on the drydock and calculated water levels in each ballast tank of the drydock at all phases of the docking and undocking evolutions.

7. Laydown plan showing how support equipment and material will be staged in the dock and a narrative plan describing how the offeror will stay within all drydock operational limitations, including weight, line load and dimensional space constraints, in the execution of the availability’s work package requirements. Provide a list of all assumptions made regarding static and dynamic loading, including expected manning levels, during execution.

8. Narrative plan for vessel transit to and from the contractor’s facility providing the results of the requirements of

3.1 through 3.3 of NAVSEA Standard Item 009-101, demonstrating compliance with references 1 - 4, as applicable.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

SECTION M

1.0 GENERAL

The Government intends to award three separate Fixed-Price contracts to the offeror(s) whose collective proposals represent the Best Value to the Government for all three Availabilities.

The competition for the following availability is restricted to offerors able to perform within the Norfolk, VA homeport:

USS ARLEIGH BURKE (DDG 51) Dry-Docking Selected Restricted Availability (DSRA)

The competition for the following availabilities shall be coast-wide (East and Gulf coasts):

Offerors are advised that the Government intends to make award on the basis of initial proposals without conducting discussions with Offerors, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary (see paragraph (f)(4) of FAR 52.215-1). Therefore, each initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. Statements and representations made in the Offeror’s proposal may be subject to verification by other sources or through an onsite survey by Navy evaluators.

Offerors are advised that the Government will not evaluate any proposal information not contained within the body of the proposal.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

Offerors must be found technically acceptable in the following three (3) Non-Price Factors and responsible in accordance with FAR 9.104 to be considered for award. It is the Government’s intent to award to the execution scenarios, proposing the lowest overall total evaluated price found technically acceptable and responsible, that allows the execution of all solicited Availabilities. However, the government reserves the right to award to other than the lowest overall total evaluated price scenarios should the Government determine such awards would provide improved dry-dock utilization that would benefit the Navy.

Non- Price Factors Factor 1: Eligibility Factor Factor 2: Schedule & Resource Capacity Factor 3: Transit and Dry-Docking Capability

Factor 4: Price

EVALUATION FACTORS

Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor:

Basis of Evaluation - The objective of this factor is to determine whether, at time of contract award, the offeror holds a Master Ship Repair Agreement or MSRA Equivalency, has ownership or committed access to pier(s) capable of berthing the vessel(s), and has ownership or committed access to dry dock(s) capable of docking the vessel(s).

The Government will assess the offeror’s eligibility using the Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet provided in Attachment S-5 of the solicitation.

In order to be considered eligible for award, the offeror must provide:

Evidence that offeror holds a Master Ship Repair Agreement or submit documentation for MSRA Equivalency.

Have a letter signed by the Principal identifying and confirming ownership or committed access (in the form of a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access) to pier capable of berthing, and a dry dock capable of docking, the vessel(s) proposed at time of contract award.

Factor 2 – Schedule & Resource Capacity:

1. The objective of this factor is to evaluate the offeror's response to the Section L requirements for this factor in order to:

Assess the offeror’s understanding of the resources required and the work sequencing necessary to successfully complete the execution scenario’s highly complex maintenance and modernization requirements. The Offeror’s response will be evaluated to assess whether the offeror conveys a detailed and complete understanding of how to complete the technical requirements;

and

Assess the offeror’s plan to provide the resources, including personnel and facility resources, necessary to successfully complete the execution scenario’s highly complex maintenance and modernization requirements.

The offeror will be evaluated on the completeness and reasonableness of the manpower curves and manpower resource plan. Information provided shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Government, a reasonable expectation of successful execution.

The offeror will be evaluated on the completeness and reasonableness of the personnel and facility information provided in response to this factor. Information provided shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Government, a reasonable expectation of successful execution. The offeror must clearly demonstrate that it has access to the required facilities required to execute the execution scenario. Additionally, the offeror will be evaluated on its ability to resolve resource issues as a result the award of other outstaning proposals. Information provided shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Government, a reasonable expectation of successful execution.

Factor 3 – Transit and Dry-docking Capability:

Basis of Evaluation - The objective of this factor is to determine whether Offerors are able to safely and satisfactorily transit the vessel to their facility, dry-dock the vessel, and execute the Availability’s required work in compliance with the Availability’s requirements and Naval Ships Technical Manual (NSTM) Chapter 079 Damage Control, Stability and Buoyancy.

Ratings

The ratings will be based on what is contained or referenced in the proposal, not on information obtained from other sources. Standards have been established to provide the same set of values for all evaluators. The objectives of using these standards are to promote uniformity in evaluation and to aid in the comparison and understanding of the evaluation results. The standards are set as follows:

Factors 1, 2 & 3 –

For Factors 1, 2 & 3, the adjectival rating reflects whether the information submitted in response to Factors 1, 2 & 3 meet or do not meet the minimum requirements through an assessment of the proposal. The evaluation will identify any deficiencies in offeror’s proposals. Adjectival ratings for Factors 1, 2 & 3 are as follows:

Adjectival Ratings for Factors 1, 2 & 3 Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Factor 4 - Price

The Government will analyze price proposals in accordance with FAR 15.404 using the information contained in each Availabilities Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4, J-11 and J-18). Although award will be made based on an offeror’s total price, a price proposal that is found unreasonable and/or unbalanced may be rejected. Reasonableness will be determined based on proposals submitted in accordance with FAR 15.404. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. The Government may reject an offer if the Contracting Officer determines the lack of balance poses and unacceptable risk to the Government. The Government will review the offeror’s CLIN and Work Item prices for each Availability to identify any significant disparities that may indicate a lack of understanding of contract requirements.

Total evaluated price for each Availability shall be calculated by adding:

The price of the basic contract line item numbers (CLIN) (this amount shall match the total price of all work items), The price of all option CLINs, The price of all Growth Reservation CLINS (Base and Option), The evaluated price of the Extension Day Rates and Labor and Material Burden New Work Rates If applicable, the Value Adjusted Trade Off schedule adjustment, and If applicable, the value of the inter-port differential (as identified in Section L of this solicitation) And then subcontracting the Offeror’s price support to 009-72.

As described in Section L, Offerors should provide a narrative of their plan to support 009-72. Plans shall be evaluated only for their reasonableness. The price support to 009-72 will not be included in the total evaluated price.

The Growth Reservation CLINs price, Evaluated Extension day price, Labor and Material Burden Rate New Work Evaluated Price

The Growth Reservation CLINs price, Evaluated Extension day price, Labor and Material Burden Rate New Work Evaluated Price shall be calculated in the following manner:

Additional Requirements CLINs (Base and Option)

1. Multiply the proposed labor hour rate by the number of hours associated with the specific Additional Requirement CLIN in each Availability’s Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4, J-11 and J-18) to yield the labor hour price for that CLIN.

2. Multiply the material burden rate proposed by the dollar value of material associated with the specific Additional Requirement CLIN in each Availability’s Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4, J-11 and J-18) to yield the burdened material price for that CLIN.

3. Each Availability’s Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4, J-11 and J-18) will add the sum of labor hour and material dollar price to find the total price for each Additional Requirements…