FBO_Response_10.pdf

Solicitation #: N00024-18-R-4448 NAVSEA POC Name/Title Phone

Date of Response: 12/18/2018 Jamillah Powell 202-781-2040 Randolph Cook 202-781-0093

E-Mail jamillah.powell@navy.mil randolph.cook@navy.mil

FBO Post # Work Item No.

Document Number/Title Document

Type Question Government Response

233-12-003 Number 1B Main Propulsion Diesel Engine (MPDE) Turbocharger Air Intercooler and Duct Manifold; clean, inspect and replace

Other

USS GUNSTON HALL IAW Errata 5, Right Bank Air Dryer Assembly has been removed from 5.1. IAW 3.4.5.2 contractor is instructed to install new right bank air dryer assembly listed in 5.1.

Is it the Government's intent to delete air dryer from spec item? Or, is it the Government's intent for contractor to procure air dryer assembly?

It is the government's intent for the contractor to procure and install the new air dryer assembly. Errata 8 has been issued to correct para 3.4.5.2

311-22-011 (E7) Number 2 Ship's Service Diesel Generator (SSDG) Piston and Liner Assembly; replace

Other

USS GUNSTON HALL Para. 3.10 cannot be estimated as written for scope is unclear and not defined.

Request government to define what repairs, where, and length/size are to be accomplished?

Errata 8 has been issued to revise Para 3.10 to state that the contractor shall lift the engine block and provide 30 man-days of engine block weld repairs utilizing an OEM certified factory welder using 2.2 and 2.5 for guidance.

311-22-011 (E7) Number 2 Ship's Service Diesel Generator (SSDG) Piston and Liner Assembly; replace

Other USS GUNSTON HALL Is the intent of paragraph Para. 3.10 for contractor to lift the engine block so to identify damaged areas and submit CFR for weld repairs to be completed?

Errata 8 has been issued to revise Para 3.10 to state that the contractor shall lift the engine block and provide 30 man-days of engine block weld repairs utilizing an OEM certified factory welder using 2.2 and 2.5 for guidance.

USS Gunston Hall (Errata 7) 311-22-011

Number 2 Ship's Service Diesel Generator (SSDG) Piston and Liner Assembly; replace

USS GUNSTON HALL Paragraph 3.1 changed the 009-60 requirement from disassembly, inspection, repair, assembly and operational test of the equipment to certify the engine block is suitable for continued use and welding repair for the equipment. The Tech Rep will not be able to provide pricing until the engine block is lifted.

Paragraph 3.10 directs the Contractor to "lift engine block and accomplish engine block weld repairs utilizing an OEM certified factory worker." The Tech Rep will not be able to provide pricing for engine block repairs without knowing the condition of the block after it is lifted. Recommend using LOE to provide pricing vehicle for this paragraph.

Errata 8 has been issued to revise Para 3.10 to state that the contractor shall lift the engine block and provide 30 man-days of engine block weld repairs utilizing an OEM certified factory welder using 2.2 and 2.5 for guidance.

265 J-10 Attachment Milestones Other

USS BULKELEY: In the J-10 Attachment, The execution tab has CS T/O 1 to AIT Begin Jun 28 2019, but the CS Turnovers Tab list CS TO 1 date as June 14 2019 and Sept 6, 2019.

Please provide the correct date.

CS T/O start date is JUN 28 2019. SEPT 6 2019 is the completion date. Revised attachment J-10 provided via Amendment 0013

266 Other

USS BULKELEY In the J-10 Attachment, The execution tab has HM&E T/O 1 to AIT (Oil Lab) date as May 6, 2019, but the HM&E Turnover tab list MSR HM&E T/O 1 as May 01, 2019. Please provide the correct date

The correct date is MAY 6 2019. Revised attachment J-10 provided via Amendment 0013

Amendment 14 Instructions to Offerors Other

Per Amendment 14, Section L, Estimated Award Date has shifted to the right (January 2019 timeframe), with no mention of shifted start date. Does the Government intend to move Period of Performance (POP) to the right? If so, what is the revised POP?

The government is aware of the short timeline from award to the start of each availability and is currently looking at operational schedules.

042-11-004 Marine Coating Containing Heavy Metal Material; remove and dispose

Other

USS GUNSTON HALL 009-32 para. 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 do not require the removal of or, define the scope of hazardous marine coatings to be removed and, no work item other than 042-11-004 tasks the KTR to remove or dispose of hazardous marine coatings.

Based on this information it appears that any removal and disposal of hazardous marine coatings would be charged to the LOE pool delineated in the associated CLIN for this item. Does the government agree?

Yes, any removal and disposal of hazardous marine coatings will be charged to the LOE completion CLIN.

279 167-11-003

Down and Cross Flooding Duct Door; repair Other USS Arleigh Burke: Vendor is unable to price Torsion Springs as listed in work item as part numbers do not match sizing (per the vendor). Contractor requests part numbers be confirmed or Government provide all Torsion Springs GFM.

Part Numbers are listed in reference 2.5, page # 7J, 7K, AND 7L. Part numbers are listed as BIW CAT numbers.

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Liquidated Damages are not clearly defined in contract. Please clarify

The liquidated damages description for USS BULKELEY has been revised via Amendment 13 to provide further clarification.

319 N/A

SOLICITATION Other SOLICITATION - Page 126, Note B, Paragraph 6: For contract changes involving subcontractors, subcontractor quotes will be treated as material and will be subject to the contract material burden rate shown in paragraph (7) below.

The Offeror interprets “contract changes” as noted above to be inclusive of RCCs and RTRs. Please confirm.

Confirmed. Contract changes are inclusive of RCCs and RTRs.

321 N/A

SOLICITATION Other SOLICITATION - For the “contract changes” noted on Page 126, Note B, Paragraph #6, the Offeror assumes contract changes to be RTRs and RCCs. Please confirm that these changes are drawn from the material pools within the growth subclins as discussed in Note D.

No. While Note B does refer to RCCs and RTRs, only the RTR changes are drawn from the material pools within the growth subclins as discussed in Note D.

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Regarding the number of Days for evaluation of daily extension rates included in Total Evaluated Price, counting all three potential scenarios for extension greatly increases the dollar amount added to the evaluated price as a percentage of the total pricing for actual work items. This is adding in a lot of cost in the evaluation for costs that may never be incurred. Suggest using shorter durations.

Acknowledged. The government has confirmed its requirement.

336 N/A

SOLICITATION Other SOLICITATION - Can the Government provide samples or more information on what they want to see for Factor 3?

No. Bidders should refer to Sections L and M for a description of requirements for Factor 3.