FBO_Response_06.pdf

Solicitation #: N00024-18-R-4448 NAVSEA POC

Name/Title Phone

Date of Response:10/19/2018 Jamillah Powell 202-781-2040

Randolph Cook 202-781-0093

E-Mail jamillah.powell@navy.mil randolph.cook@navy.mil

FBO Post # Work Item No. Document Number/Title Document Type Question Government Response

22 120-11-010

Deck and Bulkhead Other USS GUNSTON HALL - Please confirm that paragraph 3.7 only applies to new and disturbed work, not the entire space.

Yes, para 3.7 applies to affected areas only. The work spec identfies affected area as those areas greater than 10 sf.

23 120-11-014

Structural Bulkhead Other USS GUNSTON HALL - Please confirm that paragraph 3.6 only applies to new and disturbed work, not the entire space.

Yes, para 3.6 applies to affected areas only. The work spec identfies affected area as those areas greater than 10 sf.

24 120-11-016

Bulkhead Other USS GUNSTON HALL - Please confirm that paragraph 3.4 only applies to new and disturbed work, not the entire space.

No, the work being directed in para 3.8 applies to the entire space.

25 120-11-021

Structural Other USS GUNSTON HALL - Please confirm that paragraph 3.8 only applies to new and disturbed work, not the entire space.

Yes, para 3.8 applies to affected areas only. The work spec identfies affected area as those areas greater than 10 sf.

26 120-11-023

Machinery Space Other USS GUNSTON HALL - Please confirm that paragraph 3.4 only applies to new and disturbed work, not the entire space.

Yes, para 3.4 applies to affected areas only. The work spec identfies affected area as those areas greater than 10 sf.

27 120-11-023

Machinery Space Other USS GUNSTON HALL - Please confirm that paragraph 3.5 only applies to new and disturbed work, not the entire space.

Yes, para 3.5 applies to affected areas only. The work spec identfies affected area as those areas greater than 10 sf.

120-11-024 Supply Storeroom Other USS GUNSTON HALL - Please confirm that paragraph 3.4 only applies to new and disturbed work, not the entire space.

No, the work being directed in para 3.4 applies to the entire space.

30 844-31-001 Errata 1

Combat Systems Discrepancy Correction;

accomplish

Other USS GUNSTON HALL - Work item 844-31-001 Errata 1 was issued on 8/7/18; however, there do not appear to be any changes marked on the work item nor can the Contractor confirm any changes made. Please advise.

Confirmed, no changes were made to Work item 844-31-001 in

Errata 1.

57 992-11-009

Fuel Assistance and Towboat Service for Fuel

Barge; provide

Other USS Arleigh Burke - Paragraphs 3.1 and 3.2 requires the Contractor to provide pilot and tugs for the fuel barges. The local Fuel Depot (Craney Island) will not allow Contractors to receive or deliver fuel barges at their facility. Can the work item be revised for the Fuel

Depot to deliver and return the barges?

Errata 7 will be provided to implement new procedures in which the prime contractor shall provide suppport for the barge to be provided by government.

71 505-11-001

Silicon Aluminum Bronze (SAB Union Fittings Other USS Arleigh Burke - Para 3.1 states to accomplish material identification for each system located in 1.2 and identified in 1.3. There isn't enough information as to how many nuts are to be tested. 1.2 states "throughout ship" and 1.3 just states certain systems. For estimating purposes, please provide the number of nuts/fittings the Government wants tested.

It is the responsibility of the KTR to determine per the drawings, para 3.1, and shipcheck how many SAB Nuts are to be tested. The contractor shall test all nuts/fittings determined by the contractor to require testing.

72 468-90-001

SA 86644K Other USS Arleigh Burke - Para 3.1.1, 3.1.1.1 states to provide all rigging and remove all legacy equipment from the foundations and to rig in new equipment and install on the foundations. There is no equipment shown on the drawing. Recommend these paras be deleted from the spec or provide a list and size of the equipment the Government wants removed and installed.

Errata 7 will be provided to remove para 3.1.1 and 3.1.1.1

863-50-001 & 992-

11-001

Local Area Network Support Services & T-1

Line

Other Arleigh Burke - Both of these items are requiring Network services to the barge and the ship. Item 863-50-001 is something the shipyards have never done and is done by

MARMC & the Navy. 992-11-001 is the normal T-1 Line requirement the shipyards are used to seeing. Recommend 863-50-001 be deleted.

Concur. Errata 7 will be provided to cancel this work item.

110 313-80-001

ShipAlt DDG51-86517D, Material Handling

Equipment (MHE) Battery Charger

Replacement; accomplish

Other USS ARLEIGH BURKE - Reference 2.13 (4720-DDG51-FY19-A11) Material List shows item

132 – PLT STL 1/4” ¼” THK. There is no item 132 listed in reference 2.2. Please clarify what item 132 is for.

Reference 2.2, material items 120, 123 and CA101 are listed as GFM but are not listed on reference 2.13 (4720-DDG51-FY19-A11) Material List. Please confirm this material is being provided as GFM.

Question #1 - Government has verified Item 132 is for excess

GFM Label Plate

Question #2 - No. This material shall be provided as CFM.

Errata 3 provided for clarification of material items 120, 123 and CA101.

463-11-002 / 463-

53-001

Truck and Stave Cable; replace / SQS-53

Sonar Transducers; replace

Other USS ARLEIGH BURKE - Paragraph 3.1 - 3.1.2 should be part of item 463-11-002 Trunk and

Stave Cable; replace and removed from 463-53-001 SQS-53 Sonar Transducers; replace.

Para 3.1 thru 3.1.2 should be a part of 463-53-001 SQS-53

Sonar Transducers; replace because both work items require the use of 009-05.

113 468-90-001

ShipAlt DDG51-86644, USW-DSS AN/UYQ-

100(V)3 to AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Interface;

accomplish

Other USS ARLEIGH BURKE - Paragraphs 3.1.1 - 3.1.3, 3.1.5 - 3.6 has no equipment or structural work being accomplished. Please advise if paragraphs can be removed.

Errata 7 will be provided to remove para 3.1.1 and 3.1.1.1;

however, the Government has determined para 3.1.5 - 3.6 do have equipement or structural work being accomplished.

These paragraphs are necessary and will not be removed.

123-11-001 thru

123-11-004

Compensated Fuel Tank Groups 1 through 4 Other USS Arleigh Burke: Para 3.2 requires 009-90 oversight. The OEM Rep NAG Marine declined to bid this work. They stated they are hired by NAVSEA Philly for 009-90 requirements on all Ohmart Vega equipment on the ship. We request para 3.2 be deleted from these 4 work items

Concur. Errata 8 will be provided to delete the requirements of

009-90 (para 3.2)

123-11-001 thru

123-11-004

Compensated Fuel Tank Groups 1 through 4 Other USS Arleigh Burke: Para 3.10 states to re-install each TLI removed in 3.4. The TLI's removed are to be replaced by new equipment in item 437-90-001, MachAlt 86361.

Recommend modifying para 3.10 to re-install the switch in the tank listed in 1.2.1 only.

(1.2.1 only contains a high level switch, it dow not contain any type of TLI)

The government does not concur. The re-installation of the switches provide coverage to re-install equiement when complete. Work item to be revised in accordance with the response to question 117.

120 123-11-006

Compensated Fuel Tank Group 6 Other USS Arleigh Burke: Para 3.2 requires 009-90 oversight. The OEM Rep NAG Marine declined to bid this work. They stated they are hired by NAVSEA Philly for 009-90 requirements on all Ohmart Vega equipment on the ship. We request para 3.2 be deleted.

Please see response to question 117.

122 123-11-006

Compensated Fuel Tank Group 6 Drawing USS Arleigh Burke: Para 3.10 states to re-install each TLI removed in 3.4. The TLI's removed are to be replaced by new equipment in item 437-90-001, MachAlt 86361.

Recommend modifying para 3.10 to re-install the switch in the tank listed in 1.2.1 only.

(1.2.1 only contains a high level switch, it dow not contain any type of TLI)

Please see response to question 118.

123-11-007 through 123-11-

Compensated Fuel Tank Groups 1 through 6 Other USS Arleigh Burke: Because these items do not require removals, only testing, recommend deletion of 3.2, 3.3, 3.3.1 and 3.7. The intent of those paragraphs will be accomplished in item 437-90-001 MachAlt DDG-51-86361.

Concur with deletion of para 3.2 only. Errata 8 will be provided to delete the requirements of 009-90 (para 3.2). Please execute the remainder of the WI as currenlty written.

125 123-14-001

Potable Water Tanks Other USS Arleigh Burke: Para 3.2 requires 009-90 oversight. The OEM Rep NAG Marine declined to bid this work. They stated they are hired by NAVSEA Philly for 009-90 requirements on all Ohmart Vega equipment on the ship. We request para 3.2 be deleted.

Please see response to question 117.

126 123-14-001

Potable Water Tanks Other USS Arleigh Burke: Tanks listed in 1.2 contain Radar TLIs not TDRs. They can be protected from preservation efforts simply by blanking off the waveguide and plugging wave guide vent and do not require removal/re-installation. Recommend deletion of 3.4 and 3.10.

The government does not concur. The re-installation of the switches provide coverage to re-install equiement when complete. Work item to be revised in accordance with the response to question 117.

143 244-10-001

Stern Tube & Strut Bearing Straps Drawing USS Arleigh Burke: On Ref 2.5, Pc 2, OPTION 2, allows for the use of castings vs rolled and welded copper nickel plate. In recent history, the GFM that was supplied for the wedding band material has been castings vs rolled plate. The replacement material called out in 3.5.2 has also been the cased material. Please confirm the GFM provided in 5.1 is going to be the castings. Also please confirm, the replacement material required by 3.5.2 will also be the casting material.

The material type of the GFM is currently unknown. IAW

General note 7 of Reference 2.5 , the Government reserves the right for the material to be plate or castings.

No - IAW General note 7 of Reference 2.5 option to use plate or casting is acceptable.

145 262-11-001

Flexible Hose Assembly Other USS ARLEIGH BURKE: The references provided does not provide specific material required to manufacture hose assembly. Please provide hose dimensions and details

The work item identified, 262-11-001, in the bidders question is titled, "Main Reduction Gear (MRG) Lube Oil Cooler; chemically clean and inspect" in Burke's package and does not coincide with the question.

146 485-90-001

SA 81961K & 85114K TTWCS GFM Arleigh Burke Question: Para 2.4 and 5.1 indicate there is GFM. However, the 4720 states there are no drawings found for these SA's. Please provide a list of material the

Government will provide.

The government does not understand the bidder's question.

Work item # 485-90-001 is not included in the Arleigh Burke work package.

149 123-17-001

Contaminated Oil Tank; repair and preserve Other USS ARLEIGH BURKE - Paragraph 3.4 directs the Contractor to accomplish the following repairs in each tank located in 1.2 using 2.5 through 2.8 and results of 3.1.1 for guidance.

A) Paragraph 3.4.1 provides direction to “ vee-out and weld a total of 30 LF of deteriorated and damaged weld.” Is this for each tank or total of all tanks?

B) Paragraph 3.4.2 provides direction to “accomplish base metal weld buildup a total of

1,000 sq inches of plate defects.” Is this for each tank or total of all tanks?

C) Paragraph 3.4.3 provides direction to “remove, fit and install a total of 14 SF of deteriorated plate.” Is this for each tank or total of all tanks?

As stated in 3.4 the following sub paragraphs total quantity of frontload is for EACH tank.

992-11-007 & 992-

11-010

Messing and Berthing Barge, Steam and

Electric

Other Arleigh Burke Question: Items 992-11-007 & 992-11-0101 are the Temporary Service items for the two type living barges and are written for the out of port bidders. Please confirm, Norfolk is NOT to price these two work item but should price 992-11-014 & 992-

11-015, which is the Temporary Services for a Steam and Electric barge for Norfolk area.

All bidders shall price work items 992-11-007 & 992-11-010 as well as 992-11-014 & 992-11-015. The government will execise options as necessary.

160 584-21-004

Stern Gate Hydraulic Cylinder Assembly Other USS GUNSTON HALL - Paragraph 3.4 states to "remove each existing hydraulic cylinder and mount". The cylinders are generally removed from the mount/rails for repairs or renewal.

This prevents realigning the mount/rails and issues with fitted bolts/shim blocks etc.

Please clarify what mounts are to be removed? The side plates mounted on the cylinders that run on the rails are generally reused and bolted on the cylinders.

Contractor is to remove the existing hydraulic cylinder mounts and perform the work IAW paragraph 3.4 of the work spec.

161 415-90-001

ShipAlt LSD44-82497K, 2G Advanced

Engineering Control System

Other USS GUNSTON HALL - This item is in the work package, but not found on J-18. Please advise.

Amendment 0012 provided to revise Attachment J-18…

162 980-90-007

ShipAlt LSD44-82497K, AIT Support Service;

provide

Other USS GUNSTON HALL - This item is in the work package, but not found on J-18. Please advise.

Amendment 0012 provided to revise Attachment J-18...

166 130-11-003

Machinery Space; repair Other USS GUNSTON HALL: Spec cannot be accurately bid as written, please provide thickness of plate called out in 3.1.1 and dimensions of tee bar called out in 3.1.2 "for bidding purposes only."

Errata 5 will be provided to state that the plate size is 7/32 (AH-

36), per ESR 14-5046 and that Tee bar size is W 14X30 IT, ASTM

A-36. These dimnesions are provided for bidding purposes only.

172 123-11-006

Fuel Oil Storage Tank; repair Other USS GUNSTON HALL - Paragraph 3.12 directs the Contractor to accomplish 009-32 in way of repairs. Please confirm tanks are to be blasted in way of repairs only or ALL tanks are to be blasted.

Para 3.12 directs accomplishment of 009-25 of 2.1. Please provide the correct paragraph in question.

233-11-012 and

233-11-009 (E1)

Number 1A Main Propulsion Diesel Engine

(MPDE) Coupling; repair /// Number 1A Main

Propulsion Diesel Engine (MPDE); overhaul

Other USS GUNSTON HALL - Is the intention for KTR to purchase part numbers (P12620346 and

P12620635) for 233-11-012 AND the same part numbers (P12620346 and P12620635) be provided as GFM for 233-11-009? Please advise and revise at earliest opportunity.

CONCUR, the contractor is to order materials as CFM for work item 233-11-012 part numbers P12620346 and P12620635.

Work item 233-11-009 part numbers P12620346 and

P12620635 will also be provided as GFM.

176 311-21-011 (E3)

Number One Ship's Service Diesel Generator

(SSDG) Differential Bypass Relief Valve and

Lube Oil Relief Valve; repair

GFM USS GUNSTON HALL - Does the GFM material listed in PARA. 5 consist of ALL the material listed within PARA. 3.9.1?

NO. Contractor is to order CFM material listed in para 3.9.1

ERRATA 5 provided to remove material listed in para 5 pertaining to para 3.9.1.

177 130-11-003

Machinery Space; repair Other USS GUNSTON HALL - Spec cannot be accurately bid as written, please provide thickness of plate called out in 3.1.1 and dimensions of tee bar called out in 3.1.2 "for bidding purposes only."

see response to question #166.

179 N/A

Attachment J-17 - LSD44 DSRA Flex

Milestones_rev 1

Other USS GUNSTON HALL - Attachment J-17 - LSD44 DSRA Flex Milestones_rev 1 provided by

Amendment 2 has calculation errors.

Contractor requests Government to provide revised copy.

Attachment J-17 - LSD 4 DSRA Flex Milestons_rev 2 provided by

Amendment 0010.

992-11-017

Local Area Network (LAN) Support Service;

provide

Other USS GUNSTON HALL: The work scope is not defined sufficiently to be priced. The KTR is requested to provide Ship's Force Assistance to maintain connectivity of the LAN. Please define the amount of assistance and hardware the KTR is required to provide.

Errata 6 will be provided to define support needed to support ship's force. The Prime KTR will be required to acquire services of a technical representative to assist ship's force to re-locate

LAN. The Prime KTR will be required to provide end to end LAN connectivity. Off-ship migration and return.

992-11-017

Local Area Network (LAN) Support Service;

provide

Other USS GUNSTON HALL: The spec requires a 009-90 OEM representative to support.

Please identify a source for this support.

ERRATA 6 will be submiited to remove requirements of 009-90.

992-11-017

Local Area Network (LAN) Support Service;

provide

Other USS GUNSTON HALL: Para 3.14 - 3.18 are clearly government responsibility and not the

KTR.

Please advise

CONCUR. The purpose of paragraphs 3.14 - 3.18 are to define the role of the government in completion of this task.

042-11-004

Marine Coating Containing Heavy Metal

Material; remove and dispose

Other USS GUNSTON HALL: as modified by Errata 1, the spec does not make sense. Basically, it says to "observe the following" when heavy metals are found and the next para has been deleted . Please advise

ERRATA 1 only removed the LOE's. The continuing paragraph after the LOE is still intact.

980-11-002

Industrial Support Service; provide Other USS GUNSTON HALL: Para 3.2 includes the requirement to provide transpoirtation services. Please define the scope of the transportation service required. (Does it involve travel outside the facility?)

No. The scope of the Work Item does not include transporation services outside the facility. Errata 7 will be issued to state that transportation services are needed from the parking lot to the ship in cases where the distance between the parking lot and the ship is .25 miles or greater.

980-11-002

Industrial Support Service; provide Other USS GUNSTON HALL: Para 3.3 is to accomplish 009-32 repairs for New & disturbed. Since the scope of work is entirely LOE, it is assummed the 009-32 repair will be accomplished using the LOE pool. If not, the scope of repairs would need to be better defined in order to price. Please advise

CONCUR, 009-32 will be accomplished using the LOE pool.

980-90-003

ShipAlt LSD-44-75995K, Replace AN/WSN-2 with AN/WSN-7B, Alteration Installation

Team (AIT) Support Service; provide (OPTION

ITEM)

Other USS GUNSTON HALL: This work item is stricktly an AIT Support work item except the last sub-paragraph 3.14 which directs the Prime Ktr to accomplish 009-32 repairs. Please clarify if AIT's are responsible for 009-32 repair for any work they accomplish or damage done to painted surfaces in support of thier work or better define the Prime Ktr's scope as to how much painting will be required. this issue is common to most AIT support items that lack LOE.

Para 3.14 refers to repair of damages caused by the Prime contractor during the installation and removal of services provided by the prime contractor to the AIT. The AIT is responsible for AIT induced damage and the prime contractor is responsible for prime contractor induced damage.

189 168-80-002

SA 77228D Install CRES WT Doors Drawing USS Bulkeley: The Second Addendum 1 we received ref 2.25 was added, RLAR 1177383.

We also didn't receive ref. 2.27, 7498087. Please provide these references.

1177382 was provided on 8/23/2018. Instructions for receipt of references 2.27 are provided in para 4.1 of the work item.

190 411-90-001

SA 89925K Other USS BULKELEY - Para 3.8.1 has identified deck repairs in locations 1.2.1.5 through 1.2.1.8.

Location of work only goes to 1.2.1.6. Please correct para 3.8.1 or add these locations in

1.2

Corrected on Errata 2

191 150-11-013

Structural Repair; accomplish Other USS Bulkeley: Please confirm the preservation required is in way of repairs only. Confirmed. Paras 3.7 and 3.8 have been corrected on Errata 2 to state "in way of repairs only."

192 259-10-001

Number One Gas Turbine Mixing Room, Uptake and Boundary Layer

Infra-Red Suppression System (BLISS) Cap;

repair

Other USS Bulkeley: Please confirm locations to be preserved in 3.10 are in way of repairs only.

Furthere para 3.10.1 Table 2 Line 1 is not for non skid, please provide the correct table and Line

Confirmed. Para 3.10.1 has been corrected on Errata 2 to correct table and line. 3.10 has been corrected to state "in way of repairs only."

193 259-10-002 Errata 1

Number 2 Gas Turbine Mixing Room, Uptake and Boundary Layer

Infra-Red Suppression System (BLISS) Cap;

repair and preserve

Other USS Bulkeley: Please identify deck surfaces receiving non-skid with specific locations and frame references and identify the correct table and line for areas not receiving non-skid.

Para 3.11 has been corrected on Errata 2 to identify deck surfaces.

195 631-13-007

Collective Protection System (CPS) Zone 3 Fan

Room; repair and preserve

Other USS Bulkeley: Para 3.2 states to commercial blast clean. Please clarify if a second surface prep is needed as none is requested in para 3.8

No. A second surface prep is not needed.

196 631-13-009

Collective Protection System (CPS) Zone 4 Fan

Room; repair and preserve

Other USS Bulkeley: Para 3.2 states to commercial blast clean. Please clarify if a second surface prep is needed as none is requested in para 3.8

No. A second surface prep is not needed.

197 631-13-010

Boatswain Storeroom Number 2; preserve Other USS Bulkeley: Please confirm that the intention in Para 3.1 is not to preserve the bilge or

Deck surfaces located in 1.2.1

The work item specifies that all painted areas should be preserved. The deck surfaces are painted areas. The intention is to preserve the deck surfaces located in 1.2.1.

203 123-17-001

Tank; repair and preserve Other USS BULKELEY - Tank listed in 1.2.1 to be preserved is also preseved in WI 123-17-002 and

WI 123-17-003, please update for the correct scope of work

WI cancelled on Errata 2

212 150-11-010

Structural Repair; accomplish Drawing USS BULKELEY - Please provide reference 2.7, drawing 472-7498089 Rev Q. Instructions for receipt of references 2.27 are provided in para

4.1 of the work item.

216 168-11-001

Cargo Door; inspect and repair Drawing USS Bulkeley - Paragraph 2.7 reads "472-7498089 Rev A, Door, Hinge Assembly Sheet 1 of

2" but that is an incorrect drawing number (same drawing number as 2.6 but different title).

Instructions for receipt of references 2.27 are provided in para

4.1 of the work item.

244-11-001 & 244-

12-001

Stern Tube & Strut Bearing Strap, STBD &

PORT

Drawing USS Bulkeley: a) Ref 2.2 calls for Rev 2. The latest is Rev 3. Please change the spec to read rev 3. Also, only Rev 1 was provided on the CD. 2) On Ref 2.2, Pc 2, OPTION 2, allows for the use of castings vs rolled and welded copper nickel plate. In recent history, the GFM that was supplied for the wedding band material has been castings vs rolled plate. Please confirm the GFM provided in 5.1 is going to be the casting material.

Confirmed. The wedding band material will be casting material.

Errata 4 will be provided to change the WI to read Rev 3.

240 150-11-013

Structural Repair; accomplish Other USS Bulkeley - Please identify what locations are to be preserved in paragraph 3.7 and 3.8 or state in way of repairs if that is the intention.

See response to question 191.

241 171-11-001

Antenna Platform; replace Other USS Bulkeley - Please identify locations to be preserved in paragraph 3.5. The contractor is to preserve the locations listed in paragraph

1.2

242 259-10-001

Number One Gas Turbine Mixing Room, Uptake and Boundary Layer

Infra-Red Suppression System (BLISS) Cap;

repair

Other USS Bulkeley - Please clarify the locations to be preserved in paragraph 3.10 with specific locations and frame references. Paragraph 3.10.1, Table 2 Line 1 is not for non-skid.

Please update for correct table and line.

The work item states that repair work shall be completed after inspection, as designated by the supervisor up to the specified amount. Errata 2 provided to clarify the locations are "in way of repairs."

244 625-11-001

Pilot House Window; replace Other USS Bulkeley - Paragraph 3.5 states to SP-11 exterior surfaces of the windows. Paragraph

3.6 states to SP-10 exterior surfaces of the windows. Is the intention to SP-11 and then SP-

10 the exterior surfaces or is the intention to only SP-11 the exterior surfaces?

No. The intention is to SP-11 exterior surfaces. Para 3.6 has been corrected on Errata 2.

247 631-13-010

Boatswain Storeroom Number 2; preserve Other USS Bulkeley - Please clarify that the intention in paragraph 3.1 is not to preserve the bilge or deck surfaces located in 1.2.1.

See response to questions 197 above.

255 631-11-002

Auxiliary Machinery Room Number 2;

preserve

Other USS Bulkeley - Bilge listed in in 1.2.1 to be preserved is also preserved in 631-11-017.

Please update for the correct scope of work.

Work item will be cancelled via Errata 3.

256 593-21-003

#2 G/T Waste Drain Pump & Motor; overhaul Other USS Bulkeley - Paragraph 3.5.2.2 directs the Contractor to submit reports IAW paragraph

3.4.2 through 3.4.2.1. There are no paragraphs 3.4.2-3.4.2.1.

Errata 3 will be issued to change to 3.4.2 through 3.4.2.1 to

3.5.2 through 3.5.2.1

257 593-21-004

#1 G/T Waste Drain Pump & Motor; overhaul Other USS Bulkeley - Paragraph 3.5.2.2 directs the Contractor to submit reports IAW paragraph

3.4.2 through 3.4.2.1. There are no paragraphs 3.4.2-3.4.2.1.

Errata 3 will be issued to change to 3.4.2 through 3.4.2.1 to

3.5.2 through 3.5.2.1

Milestones Other USS Bulkeley - On the provided milestones, PCD is called out 50 days before LOA.

Typically PCD is 14 days before LOA. Will PCD be changed to 14 days prior to LOA?

See response to question 170.

261 992-11-003

Temporary Service; provide Other USS Bulkeley - Is the intent of paragraph 3.18.1 to install temporary HVAC in all living spaces for the duration of the availability?

Paragraph 3.19.1 previously addressed HVAC. With the issuance of Errata 1, the paragraph about HVAC is now 3.20.1 which states "Install HV/AC units in living spaces to maintain ambient temperatures of 65 to 75 degrees Fahrenheit for the duration of the availabity." Errata 5 will be issued to delete paragraph 3.20.1 as this is no longer a requirement.

262 321-80-001

DDG 51 Class AER 64201D, Stuffing Tube

Replacement; accomplish

Other USS Bulkeley - Paragraph 3.2 states to accomplish the requirements of 2.2 - 2.4 for the replacement of (23) stuffing tubes listed in Attachment B. The supervisor shall designate an additional (102) stuffing tubes listed in 1.3 to be replaced for a total of (125).

For estimating purposes, please provide the sizes and locations of the addition (102) stuffing tubes.

Locations of the additional stuffing tubes will be designated by the supervisor. Stuffing Tube sizes; Size B-40, Size C-40, Size-D-

263 437-90-001

ShipAlt DDG51-77829K, Installation of Radar and TDR TLI's for DFM, JP-5 and Potable

Water Tanks

Other USS Bulkeley - Para 3.1 states Alteration Installation Team (AIT) will be responsible for the accomplishment of the following requirements.

Paragraph 3.1 - Ripout, installation, termination and testing of electrical cable including opening and closing each multiple cable transit (MCT).

Paragraph 3.1.2 - Removal and installation of power panels, switches, transformers, lighting fixtures, phones, speakers and terminal box.

Paragraph 3.3 - Accomplish the requirements of sheet 3-6 of reference 2.10. Reference

2.10 is ripout and installation of electrical cable and equipment.

Is the Contractor to accomplish the requirements of 3.3? Please advise.

The work item states that paragraph 3.3 is to be accomplished by the prime contractor.

276 167-80-001

SA 72424D MAFO-Holtkamp Door Drawing USS Bulkeley: RLAR 72424-DDG72-1147961 was added to this work item via Errata 2, however we did not receive this reference. Please provide RLAR.

RLAR 72424-DDG72-1147961b was provided on 10/04/2018.

278 522-90-001

ShipAlt DDG51-80255, Replace Magazine Fire

Detection System; accomplish

Other USS Bulkeley: Reference DDG-84-4720 was provided with Addendum 1, work item 522-90-

001; however, it does not include the material summary for ShipAlt 80255K as referenced in paragraph 5.3. This paragraph calls out Kitted Material as GFM but without the material summary, Contractor is unaware of what items are included in the kit.

Additionally, the Contractor has received feedback from the vendor that they have received an order directly from the Navy for the USS Bulkeley and will not provide pricing information for some specific items.

In order to ensure Contractor is not requesting pricing for items to be provided as GFM, we request a listing of all items that are to be provided as Kitted Material in accordance with paragraph 5.3.

All items listed on sheet 30 of para 2.2 and sheet 28 of para 2.3 that are sourced as HSC will be provided by the government.

Para 3.15 states all items listed as GFM in 2.2 and 2.3 are to be procured by the contractor.

300 N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - The Solicitation mentions “Critical Path” in several locations. In light of the multiple production scenarios requested under the solicitation, it would be beneficial for the Government to provide each Planning Yard Availability Analysis to the bidders.

Will the Government provide each Planning Yard Availability Analysis?

The Government will not provide the Planning Yard Availability

Analysis to the bidders.

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Paragraph 3 specifies percentages of growth reservation that can be tasked after certain points in the availability schedule. For example, "No more than 25% of the hours or material following the 75% schedule point the availability (as measured in days between the “Start Availability” and “End of Availability” milestones in Attachment J-

3, Attachment J-10, and Attachment J-17)." However, using the entire period of performance instead of the period in which production work must be completed creates impossible work requirements. For example, using the maximum period of performance on the Bulkeley DMP, the 75% point of the maximum availability schedule (340 days into the 453 day availability) is 12 Dec 2019. PCD with this availability end date would be 23

Aug 2019. This means that up to 25% of growth hours and material could be awarded more than three months after PCD. Suggest that instead of using the entire availability period of performance, that the period between "Start Availability" and the milestone the work item is tied to be used to apply these percentages. For example, a work item tied to

PCD would have the 75% point on 27 Jun 2019, two months prior to PCD.

The Navy has considered the offeror's request but has elected to leave NOTE G: Availability Schedule Performance, paragraph

3 unchanged.

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - The penalties incorporated by the QASP are punitive in nature. Please consider elimination of all QASP penalties.

The Navy has considered the offeror's request but has elected to keep the QASP in the contract.

305 N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Please confirm that the VATEP factor is not an incentive that results in additional dollars to the contractor.

The Offeror is correct. The VATEP factor is not an incentive that results in additional dollars to the contractor. The VATEP is a proposal evaluation factor that, if proposed, reduces the offeror's total evaluated price.

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Can you explain how the IPD was derived? The Navy does not release the mechanics of how inter-port differentials are derived for specific Availabilities.

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - What's the difference between contractor complete and end of avail? The "difference between contractor complete and end of avail" is specific to the Availability in question. For the DDG51 FY19

DSRA and the LSD44 FY19 DSRA, the end of the contractor's period of performance and the end of the Availability occur on the same day. For the DDG84 FY19 DMP, the Availability continues for several months after the end of the contractor's period of performance to complete various testing requirements.

309 N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - How were firm fixed prices for small dollar value changes derived? The government reviewed a historical sample of previously executed changes between 0 and 25K and selected a value that was commensurate with the number of changes on each ship and reflective of risk to account for uncertaintites of future contract execution. The government infered from those parameters and created a risk distribution of what the prices should be.

310 N/A

SOLICITATION Other SOLICITATION - Why does USS BULKELEY have LDs for a multitude of space turnover events?

If there is a delay to the shipyard turnover, the LD is for the overtime required for the AIT to maintain schedule.

313 N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other SOLICITATION - Is small dollar value change negotiable? No, the price of the Small Dollar Value Change (SDVC) is a fixed value in the contract.

315 N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other SOLICITATION - LOE to completion is still included in some work items The Navy acknowledges that LOE to completion is still included in some work items

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - 1. Once mutually agreed to by both Parties, the small dollar value change of $7,587 is to be billed to the Government for each RCC (up to 386 changes) with an estimated price of $25,000 or less.

2. Unless the estimated price of the RCC (small dollar value change) is actually $7,587, then please explain how the Government intends to or will indemnify the Contractor against a false claim or procurement fraud from the perspective that with this provision it could be interpreted that the Contractor is mischarging the Government for the cost of the supplies or services rendered.

In accordance with Note F, the Navy and the contractor are agreeing to execute Small Dollar Value Changes (those with values greater than $0 and less than or equal to $25,000) for a set price. Execution of changes in accordance with Note F will be in accordance with a mutually agreed to contract.

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Please explain the difference between milestones KTR Contract Complete and End of Avail - Mission Ready. Why are the dates the same for Arleigh Burke and

Gunston Hall but several months apart on the Bulkeley?

Please see response to question #308.

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Do contractor responsibilities on the Bulkeley extend beyond KTR contract complete? If not, for the purposes of this solicitation, END OF AVAIL should be the same date as KTR contract complete. (For example, End of Avail is used in Secftion B in the determination of how much growth a contract needs to support between the Start of

Avail and End of Avail dates).

Please see response to question #308.

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Does Execution Scenario 1 REQUIRE a contractor to submit individual price proposals on all THREE of the availabilities in order to be considered responsive?

Execution Scenario 1 requires offerors to submit individual price proposals for EVERY availability that could be completing using the offeror's available pier and dock facilties. So, for example if an offeror is capable of completing allof the three availabilities, then that offeror is REQUIRED to submit an indvidual price proposal on all THREE availabilities.

326 N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Does the Government want to receive one proposal for Scenario 1 with pricing for three different availabilities included, or three separate packages, one for each availability?

In accordance with Section 2.0 of the Section L of the RFP, Offerors shall submit Volumes I and II for each Availability under each proposed Execution Scenario.

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - If these are to be separate proposals for each of the three Scenario 1 availabilities, should all of this info in the Vol 1 Price Proposal section be included in each proposal’s price cover letter?

In accordance with Section L, pages 214-15, "the price proposal for each Availability proposed under each Execution Scenario shall be comprised of" all of the information listed in paragraphs a. through g. that follow.

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - In a Scenario 1 bid, does a contractor need to communicate the fourth section above that we cannot dock two DDGs in same dock simultaneously (which is not a component of a Scenario 1 bid)?

In accordance tih Section L, page 215, the price proposal for each Availability proposed under each Execution Scenario must include a Cover Letter which affirmatively states "whether or not they have ownership of, or committed access to, NAVSEA certified dry-dock(s) capable of “double” dry-docking the

DDG51 and DDG84 concurrently"

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Should each availability be in a separate proposal with a separate cover letter, or all three Scenario 1 availabilities in one proposal?

In accordance with Section L, page 214, "Offerors shall label each availability proposal in order to clearly indicate which execution scenario is proposed." Further, Section L on pages

214-15 states that, "[t]he price proposal for each Availability proposed under each Execution Scenario shall be comprised" of all the information in paragraphs a. through g. that follow.

Therefore, each availability for Scenario 1 should be in a separate proposal with a separate cover letter.

331 N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Why does the Bulkeley DMP have LD for all those individual space turnover milestones (the other two availabilities do not)?

The DDG84 FY19 DMP has liquidated damages (LD) on individual space turnover milestones because the DDG84 FY19

DMP's execution schedule includes individual space turnover milestones. The DDG51 FY19 DSRA and the LSD44 FY19 DSRA do not have individual space turnover milestones.

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Why does Norfolk have an interport differential since all three ships are homeported in Norfolk?

Please see response to question #307

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Request the Government share the breakdown for how these interport differentials were calculated.

Please see response to question #307.

335 N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - If a company without facilities is proposing to use a dock and pier owned by another company, what will the Government need to see in order to determine the proposal to be responsive and meet the technical requirements?

Offerors proposing to use a dock or pier owned by another company are expected to provide all proposal information required in Section L.

338 N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Gunston Hall anticipated growth seems excessive even for an LSD. What data is being used to determine that this is an appropriate amount of growth used in the total evaluated pricing?

The Government based anticipated growth on actual historical growth on previously completed LSD 41/49 class CNO

Availabilities.

339 N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Gunston Hall (Section B, NOTE G): Contractor should be able to permit a contract scope increase of 224,367 manhours and $2,357,153 material dollars. The two

DDGs have the same numbers between Section B, NOTE G and their AGR labor hours.

Why is the Gunston Hall AGR labor hours so much higher than the Section B, NOTE G requirement? This exorbitant amount of growth added to the evaluated price could change the award outcome due to an unsupported quantity of growth labor hours.

Request the amount of AGR be reduced to the amount in Section B, NOTE G.

The Government based anticipated growth for the LSD44 FY19

DSRA on actual historical growth on previously completed LSD

41/49 class CNO Availabilities. However, under NOTE G:

AVAILABILITY SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE, the Government limited the amount of growth or new work that the contractor would be required to absorb without impacting, accelerating, or causing delay or disruption to the work required by the aforementioned work items, to any other Government contract, or to any other work in progress for the Government.

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - 1.) Section B does not list a CLIN 0024. 2.) J-18, on the "Labor &

Material Rates" tab, row 85, list CLIN 24, as Growth Associated with CLIN 7, there is not a place in Section B to price this. Currently we do not have a CLIN 7, so maybe CLIN 24 should just be deleted? 3.) Additionally there are two items in the package that are not on J-18, items 415-90-001 & 980-90-007, we have unanswered questions on this.

CLIN 24 and CLIN 7 listed in the pricing workbooks are reserved;

therefore offerors shall not submit proposed pricing for CLIN 24 and CLIN 7. Attachment J-18 was revised by Amendment 12 to include work items 415-90-001 and 980-90-007.

631-11-002 N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION - Please review Government response #206 . Errata 3 for Bulkeley was part of Amendment 0010 which was cancelled according to the email received 10/5/18 and

Amendment 11. Please retract this answer and confirm item 631-11-002 is in fact NOT cancelled.

Concur. The government retracts response to question # 206.

Work item 631-11-002 is not cancelled. Bidders should price work packages in accordance with the latest addendum and errata through addendum 2 and errata 3.

N/A N00024-18-R-4448 Other

SOLICITATION -

On 5 Oct 18, the government issued amendment 011 to the solicitation which stated that the errata and addendum previously issued under amendment 0010 are retracted. For clarificaiton, can the government confirm that the following errata and addendum should not be included in the proposal submission: USS ARLEIGH BURKE (Errata 6 and Errata 7);

(USS BULKELEY (Addendum 2, Errata 3, and Errata 4); and USS GUNSTON HALL (Errata 5).

Confirmed, the following errata and addendum should not be included in the proposal submission: USS ARLEIGH BURKE

(Errata 6 and Errata 7); USS BULKELEY (Addendum 2, Errata 3, and Errata 4); and USS GUNSTON HALL (Errata 5).