PRE_Conf_Feedback_Responses_3.22.2013.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 52 KB Posted Mar 22, 2013

Attached to: USN T-45 Aircraft Maintenance and Logistics Support
Solicitation number: N00019-12-R-0001
Issued by: Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command

About this file

From the source

Draft RFP Feedback received prior to Pre-Solicitation Conference and Government Responses (3/22/2013)

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Att01_T45CLS_PWS_2.3.14.pdf	PDF	Feb 4, 2014
N00019-12-R-0001_Amendment_0005.pdf	PDF	Feb 4, 2014
L-9.1_Vol_3_CSDR_Sub_Rpt_Example.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Feb 4, 2014
Att41_CNATRA_INST_4355.4A.pdf	PDF	Jan 6, 2014
Att30_NASPAX_05-2103-13.txt	TXT text file	Jan 6, 2014
Att27_NASK_AWD_05-2508-15.txt	TXT text file	Jan 6, 2014
Att06_Applicable_Docs.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Jan 6, 2014
Att01_T45CLS_PWS_12.19.13.doc	DOC document	Jan 6, 2014
Att33_NASP_CBA_WD-2013-5799.mht	MHT file	Jan 6, 2014
L-6_Vol_3_B_Matrix.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Jan 6, 2014
Exhibit_A_signed_12.19.13.pdf	PDF	Jan 6, 2014
L-13_Vol_3_Manning_Supplement.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Jan 6, 2014
Att32_NASM_CBA_WD-2013-5802.mht	MHT file	Jan 6, 2014
Att28_NASM_AWD_05-2300-15.txt	TXT text file	Jan 6, 2014
Att29_NASP_AWD_05-3034-15.txt	TXT text file	Jan 6, 2014
Att31_NASK_CBA_WD-2013-5800.mht	MHT file	Jan 6, 2014
Att02_Supplement_to_the_Exhibits _Explanation_of_Contract_Data_Requirements_List_CDRL.docx	DOCX document	Jan 6, 2014
Amendment_4.doc	DOC document	Jan 6, 2014
CDRLs_Exhibit_A_(unsigned).pdf	PDF	Jan 6, 2014
N00019-12-R-0001_Amendment_0003.pdf	PDF	May 22, 2013
5.22.2013_Q A.docx	DOCX document	May 22, 2013
5.20.2013_Q A.docx	DOCX document	May 21, 2013
N00019-12-R-0001_Amendment_2.doc	DOC document	May 13, 2013
L-9_Vol_3_CSDR_20130509.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	May 13, 2013
Exhibit_A_CDRL_Revisions.PDF	PDF	May 13, 2013
Att01_T45CLS_PWS_10MAY2013.doc	DOC document	May 13, 2013
Additional_Solicitation_Questions_and_Responses.docx	DOCX document	May 10, 2013
Att40_Requisitioned_GFP_List_30APR2013.pdf	PDF	Apr 30, 2013
L-8_Vol_3_Sub_CCS_20130429.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 30, 2013
N00019-12-R-0001_Amendment_0001.doc	DOC document	Apr 30, 2013
Att39.3_NASP_Scheduled_GFP_List_30APR2013.pdf	PDF	Apr 30, 2013
Att01_T45CLS_PWS_30APR2013.doc	DOC document	Apr 30, 2013
Att08_T45_GFP(NALCOMIS)_30APR2013.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 30, 2013
L-7_Vol_3_Prime_CCS_20130429.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 30, 2013
Att39.2_NASM_Scheduled_GFP_List_30APR2013.pdf	PDF	Apr 30, 2013
L-6_Vol_3_B_Matrix_20130429.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 30, 2013
Att38_Radioactive_Inventory_T45_30APR2013.docx	DOCX document	Apr 30, 2013
Att39.1_NASK_Scheduled_GFP_List_30APR2013.pdf	PDF	Apr 30, 2013
Att33.1_NASP_CBA_WD-2013-5799.mht	MHT file	Apr 30, 2013
Att39.4_NAS_PAX_Scheduled_GFP_List_30APR2013.pdf	PDF	Apr 30, 2013
Att32.2_NASM_CBA_WD-2013-5802.mht	MHT file	Apr 30, 2013
Att17_Real_Property_GFP_30APR13.docx	DOCX document	Apr 30, 2013
Exhibit_A_CDRL_29Apr13.PDF	PDF	Apr 30, 2013
Att31.2_NASK_CBA_WD-2013-5800.mht	MHT file	Apr 30, 2013
Final_RFP_Q A.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 29, 2013
REMAINING_Pre_Conf_Feedback_Responses_4.29.2013.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 29, 2013
REMAINING_Feedback_Responses_Post-Conf.4.29.2013.docx	DOCX document	Apr 29, 2013
Att36_CNATRA_Other_GP.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 12, 2013
Feedback_Responses_Post-Conf_3.22.2013.pdf	PDF	Mar 22, 2013
T-45_L1 M1_20130128.docx	DOCX document	Mar 20, 2013

Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 192 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Competition Library

COMPETITION LIBRARY/DATA
	Industry Questions	Government Response
1	Can the Government provide current OOMA/OIMA data in Microsoft Excel format that depicts all the required fields that a VIDS/MAF 4790/60 form displays?	The data fields that make up OPNAV Form 4790/60 (VIDS MAF) is located within COMNAVAIRFORINST 4790.2 Series. This document is located in the competition library.
2	There are two files in the Competition Library that appear to be duplicates: Aircraft Data Tab - "T-45 Compete MX" and AV-3M Tab - "T-45 FY-09 - FY-11 MMH and Maint Actions by Site". Please verify that these maintenance actions and hours are for O-Level work only. Or do they include I and D - Level work as well?	Yes, T-45 Compete and MX AV-3M Tab – T-45 FY-09 – FY-11 MMH and Maint Actions by Site contain the same data. The data represents O, I, and D-level maintenance.
3	Will the government update this data with FY-12 information?	FY12 Data has been posted.
4	Request the government provide Daily Aircraft Readiness Reports for calendar years 2011 and 2012.	FY10 - 12 Daily Status Reports are posted to competition library.
3	Unable to open the following:

1. CNATRAINST 5442

2. OPNAVINST 3710, 8023, 3960, 5100, 5102

3. NAVAIRINST 13640, 13920

4. DOD 4000, 5000

5. MIL-STD 2161B

6. NA01-IA-16-2, NA01-IA-20, NA01-IA-509-1, NA01-IA-509-2, NA01-IA-509-3, NA01-IA-509-4, NA01-IB-40, NA01-IB-50	Publications/notices/directives posted on the competition library are accessible and should be able to be opened. Please contact Jessica McGee via email with list of files that cannot be opened if this should occur again.
	4	Request any changes or updates to the Competition Library be identified so bidders will be able to easily identify new information.	Library is now indexed and has an update notification feature built into the system.
	5	CDRL B004 Readiness Degraders Reports – Please clarify if the files provided are inclusive of program sites or does this information apply to only specific sites? If the data is only for a specific site, please provide the data for all sites. Additionally, request calendar year 2012 data.	CDRL B004 is for all sites. Calendar 2012 data has been posted to the competition library.
	6	Please provide the estimated Manhours for each IMP event listed in this table.	This is to be competively proposed based off of the IMP spec located on competition library.

&D T45CLS Draft RFP Feedback (Prior to Pre-Solicitation Conference) N00019-12-R-0001

&A Page &P

Requirement Docs

DRAFT RFP Document/Section:		Industry Questions	Government Response
	1	Which sites have CASS and what is workload data for operating CASS at each site? If CASS requirements will change for each site, please include change timeframe and the impact on workload/staffing. If a site is to get CASS in the future, please tell bidders when that will occur.	DET Kingsville and DET Meridian have CASS. No change planned. DET Pensacola will not have CASS.
	2	Does the USG require any contractor personnel to have a "navy.mil" email account?	All contractor personnel utilizing NALCOMIS must have a "navy.mil" account.
	3	Letter listing of Government and RTT tooling spreadsheet. Please clarify if the Govt intends to provide all items listed as GFP.	Government will provide GFP listed in applicable attachments.
Attachment 7	4	Please provide a nomenclature column for each part number.	GFP attachments have been revised.
TDs	5	CLIN 0X11. Please define the workload and material requirements for each TD listed (VMTS, RAMP, DDS, MFCD) so bidders can determine "price per kit".	Workload and material requirements for each TD (VMTS, DDS, MFCD, RAMP) is listed in the TD. Material, aka kits, are already procured by the Govt and are also listed in the TD. TDs will be posted to Competition Library.
CLIN XX01 and XX02	6	In execution, aircraft mechanics are required to clock time against the appropriate CLINS, primarily CLIN XX01 and XX02. As currently defined (flight hour driven or non-flight hour driven)nis difficult to distinguish. If a mechanic has to change a light bulb, he has no way of knowing that failure was caused by a flight hour or corrosion. Would the Government consider narrowing CLIN XX01 to "Look Phase for hourly Inspections" which can easily be managed within a "scheduled maintenance" work center. This would greatly simplify time keeping and mitigate funding realignment during execution.	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
Attch 8	7	In compliance with FAR Part 45.201 Solicitation clause, request the government provide the following data elements for all items on all tabs of Attachment #8 Government Furnished Property:

a. Part Number

b. NSN

c. Description

d. Manufacturer

e. Model (if applicable)

f. Quantity

g. Unit of Measure

h. Unit Acquisition Cost

i. UID (if applicable)

j. Condition	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
	Attachment 8	8	5252.216-9534 Task Order Procedures (NAVAIR) (Oct 2005) (11) states "list of Government furnished property and the estimated value of the property." Will the government provide on the final copy of Attachment #8 Government Furnished Property the actual/'estimated value for each item?	See revised attachment.
	PWS 5.1.1.6	9	PWS Paragraph 5.1.1.6 states “The Contractor shall perform ground and taxi operations of the aircraft and engine required for the accomplishment/completion of scheduled and unscheduled maintenance actions on aircraft that requires engine ground operation/turn-up to verify airworthiness IAW Enclosure 3, Applicable Documents and the Contractor’s Flight and Ground Operations Plan. The Contractor shall produce and deliver a Contractor’s Flight and Ground Operations Plan (CDRL XXXX).” PWS Paragraph 5.7.6.39 states “Taxi, Turn-up, and Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) Licensing Program. NOTE: Contractor ground maintenance personnel are not authorized to taxi the aircraft and the T-45TS does not have an APU; therefore, taxi and APU licensing does not apply.” These paragraphs seem to conflict with regards to the requirement for aircraft taxi operations by maintenance personnel or is it the Government’s intent for Contractor FCF pilots to perform taxi operations?	The 4790 currently states that aircraft with APU requires licensing. However there is policy change that will include GTS licensing, which will be covered y this licensing program and the Contractor shall comply once implemented. The policy change is expected to be issued later this year.
	PWS 5.1.1.8	10	Transfer of aircraft and Acceptance Inspections – The Contractor shall perform transfer of aircraft and Acceptance Inspections when directed by the ACO IAW Enclosure 3, Applicable Documents. “PWS Paragraph 5.1.1.8.1 states “The Contractor shall perform Acceptance Inspections within five working days of receipt of aircraft.”Does the Government consider aircraft moved from NASM or NASP to NASK for an aircraft modification a transfer action, thus requiring acceptance inspections?	Yes.
	PWS 5.1.1.17.1	11	Authorized Maintenance Vendors. Does the Navy have a current list of authorized Fixed Base Operators (FBOs) and what they are qualified to do? If so will it be provided? Has the Navy established a process for qualifying FBOs to perform maintenance on the T-45?	No. It is the contractor's responsibility to determine qualified FBOs.
	PWS 5.1.6.2.4	12	PWS Paragraph 5.1.6.2.4 states “Deliver Non-Ready for Issue (N-RFI) Cartridge Activated Devices (CADs) and Aircrew Ejection Propulsion System (AEPS) to the operational site’s Weapons Department within two (2) working days of removal from the aircraft.”Does this mean that Contractor might have to deliver CADs from areas like Naval Auxiliary Landing Field (NALF) Orange Grove, TX if we are operating there?	When required, the CLS Contractor shall deliver NRFI CADs and AEPS to WEPS Department if either will be removed from aircraft for more than two days from any and all locations.
	PWS 5.4.5	13	Engine Shipping Containers. Who is responsible for providing OEM approved shipping containers to the winning bidder? Can the Government provide a list of approved sources and/or container specifications?	Engine shipping containers are Government furnished.
	PWS 5.4.5	14	The reference states that the "Contractor shall pack engines in an OEM approved shipping container IAW Enclosure 3, Applicable Documents." Where are the engine containers located? Who maintains the containers? Are the containers GFE / RR furnished?	Containers are located at all sites and are GFE. The CLS Contractor is responsible for maintenance.
	PWS 5.4.10	15	Warranties. Engines are currently being maintained under a different contract, will engines be folded in to this effort? If not, will the customer provide bidders with visibility of the engine warranty? Is the Government currently receiving this information from the Engine contractor?	I and D-Level engine maintenance are not required by the aircraft CLS contract. Warranty issues between the CLS and Engine contractor shall be vetted through CNATRA DET.
	PWS	16	PWS Paragraph states “Maintenance Safety Stand Down. Contractor shall conduct Maintenance Safety Stand Down on a semi-annual basis to review/discuss maintenance practices and procedures and ensure local and corporate plans and policies meet the requirements of the contract. Any Maintenance Safety Stand Down as the result of contractor negligence shall be conducted at contractor's expense. These shall be scheduled as directed by the ACO.” Request the Government verify that flight operations will be suspended during each Maintenance Safety Stand Down.	The contractor shall conduct their own Safety Stand Down due to contractor negligence and shall be scheduled in a not to conflict basis with flight operations.
	PWS 5.4.11.4	17	Engine Release Life. If an engine fails before its scheduled removal and the failure is covered under the Engine contractor's warranty, will the Government or the Engine contractor compensate the CLS contractor for its incurred labor due to the premature failure?	No
	PWS 5.6.2	18	PWS Paragraph 5.6.2 states “The Contractor shall conduct flight line coordination efforts that shall include, but not limited to, assisting aircrew and ensuring qualified plane captains are available for aircrew manning of aircraft. The Contractor shall complete and retain the Aircraft Inspection and Acceptance Record OPNAV FORM 4790/141.” Request the Government provide clarification on what is expected when assisting aircrew.	To cross check aircrew is manning the correct aircraft and are assisted strapping in the ejection seat.
	PWS 5.6.4.2	19	The reference states that the"Contractor shall be responsible for the installation/removal of the tie downs, covers, fueling, fuel sampling, defueling, aircraft hot refueling, and assistance to flight crews." Who has responsibility for / control over fuel trucks? Are fuel pits available?	The fuel farm contractor. Fuel pits are available.
	PWS 5.6.4.5.5	20	States that the "General tooling, special tooling, and equipment (including all maintenance equipment, peculiar support equipment (PSE), and common support equipment (CSE), storage handling equipment, and servicing equipment) not otherwise specified in this PWS." Can the Government please provide an example of CSE / PSE that might not be otherwise specified in this PWS?	Any special tooling or any additional requirements not currently listed as GFP. (i.e. tire racks, canopy holding fixtures, special jigs, fixtures, etc.)
	PWS 5.6.4.5.5	21	Please define the exact items the contractor is required to provide for each category listed in this paragraph if all these items will be purchased by the contractor under the FFP CLINS.	PWS released in DRFP does not contain a PWS paragraph 5.6.4.5.5
	PWS 5.6.6.	22	“Aircraft launched to go on detachment will be considered in a cross country status until they arrive at the detachment site.” Please define the meaning of “Cross country status”. Please define what "cross country status" means.	The time when it leaves the MOB and it arrives at the detachment site.
	PWS 5.8.6.1	23	PWS Paragraph 5.8.6.1 states “Scan and upload on a daily basis all Log Book entries detailing part swaps for the serialized components IAW technical manual number A1-T45AB-MRC-000 Periodic Maintenance Information Cards (PMIC).” The current PWS, CDRL A008, has this as an end-of-month + 15 days requirement. This requirement was adjusted to the more reasonable monthly requirement during this contract as a change to the original daily requirement. Would the Government consider leaving this as a monthly requirement?	The Government intends to keep the following: There are two separate requirements: (1) Paragraph 5.8.6.1, "Scan and upload on a daily basis all Log Book entries detailing part swaps for the serialized components IAW technical manual number A1-T45AB-MRC-000 Periodic Maintenance Information Cards (PMIC).” and (2) Paragraph 5.8.6.2, CDRL A0015, requires a monthly summary report.
	PWS 5.11.3.4.1	24	Navy & Marine Corps Internet. Does the Government provide NMCI seats or does the contractor acquire them? Can contractors acquire additional seats if deemed advantageous?	The Government provides NMCI seats. Additional NMCI seats can be requested, however the Government will determine whether to purchase.
	PWS 5.11.6	25	Please provide the annual workload estimates (number of hours) for the manual capture of maintenance actions VIDS/MAFs that is in addition to normal NALCOMIS data entry efforts to help bidders determine staffing requirements.	The Government does not collect this data and does not intend to provide an estimate.
	PWS 5.11.6.	26	This paragraph implies that the NALCOMIS OOMA/OIMA system may be inoperable frequently. Since data will have to be captured manually and reentered when the system is again operable, please define the expected workload requirements by estimating the frequency per year that the NALCOMIS OOMA/OIMA system is inoperable.i. Please identify the location for each NALCOMIS OOMA terminal on all sites.	PWS Section 5.11.6 has been revised. CNATRA does not capture back fitting labor hours manually entered. NALCOMIS/OOMA sites are Government owned and will be provided for CLS provider use. However, these sites are already in the work areas in which the Contractor will perform.
	PWS 5.11.6.3	27	PWS Paragraph 5.11.6.3 requires Part 5 of the VIDS/MAF to be forwarded to the CNATRA DET Industrial Specialist when the NALCOMIS OOMA/AIMA system is inoperable. Is it the Governments intent to make this a requirement for all VIDS/MAF Part 5, to include when aircraft rescues are involved?	Only when NALCOMIS is inoperable.
	PWS 5.11.11.	28	Please define the workload requirements for entering NAVFLIRS data into NALCOMIS until the bridge software from TIMS is operable at each site.	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
	PWS 5.11.11	29	For each site, when will the TIMS bridge software be available and what will be the impact on contractor workload?	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
	PWS 5.11.11	30	A. Please define the annual workload estimates for entering NAVFLIRS (number of hours) into NALCOMIS for each site.

B. What will be the new annual workload estimates for each site after the bridge software is operable?

C. When during the period of performance will the bridge software be implemented with the associated workload change?	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
	PWS 5.11.19	31	States "The Contractor shall provide and maintain ADP systems…"
a. Please clarify what, if any, ADP systems the contractor must purchase (provide).	The Government shall provide NALCOMIS OOMA/OIMA hardware and software. All supplies to utilize Government furnished IT equipment is the contractor's expense.

PWS 5.12.5.	32	List parts/material the CLS provider will have to obtain from the Govt	See Attachment 25
PWS 5.12.5.	33	List parts/material the CLS provider will have to obtain from commercial sources	This data is not available
PWS 5.12.5.	34	List parts/materials that come from outside the continental US	This data is not available
PWS 5.12.5.	35	Provide 5 years data on parts usage	Loaded to competition library.
PWS 5.12.5.	36	Identify all long lead order parts and material	This data is unavailable
	37	Provide Enclosure (2) as early as possible to allow for analysis	Relisted as an attachment.
PWS 5.12.5.2	38	PWS Paragraph 5.12.5.2 states “The contractor shall establish a low and high limit on each repairable item to ensure sufficient assets are available to maintain operation during periods of replenishment. The contractor shall establish no more than a 30 day demand stock level plus repair Turn Around Time (TAT) for each repairable item.”Request the Government provided clarification of this requirement because NALCOMIS only provides the authorized allowance for repairable parts. There is no high or low limit.	PWS 5.12.1 has been revised.
PWS 5.12.5.2.1, Export License	39	Please provide a list of parts including part number, vendor and average number of each part which are shipped OCONUS annually for which a DSP-73 will be required. This information is required for planning purposes, to have in place at contract start in order to avoid delays in parts delivery.	This data is not available
OCONUS Suppliers	40	Please provide a list of all parts, materials, and repairables and the associated vendors for those items that can only be purchased and repaired / overhauled with companies OCONUS so bidders can perform due diligence with regard to International Trafficking in Arms Regulations.	This data is not available
Export License	41	RFP requires contractor to provide export licenses for components repaired by an overseas vendor. The process to obtain export licenses is cumbersome and takes about 60-90 days. Could the Government provide a list of all components currently repaired overseas so that offerors can begin preparing export license paperwork prior to contract award?	This data is not available
IUID	42	IUID - Does the Government intend for the CLS contractor to provide MIL-STD-130 IUID labels or readers, or will the Government provide as GFP/GFI?	The Government does not intend to provide MIL-STD-130 IUID labels or readers.
PWS 5.13.5	43	PWS Paragraph 5.13.5, last sentence, states “The Contractor PA shall be notified the PA for approval of net changes to the total value of the inventory which exceed $5,000.00.” Request clarification as to what this statement means. Does this apply to requesting authorization prior to purchasing additional inventory?	See applicable CNATRAINST for additional information.
FLASHJET/EMMA	44	Please define the workload requirements for FLASHJET at NASK.	PWS and Applicable Docs updated to reflect required FLASHJET workload
FLASHJET/EMMA	45	When will FLASHJET be replaced so bidders can adjust staffing to EMMA?	See PWS
FLASHJET/EMMA	46	Please define the workload requirements for EMMA at NASK and at NASM.	PWS and Applicable Docs updated to reflect required FLASHJET workload
FLASHJET/EMMA	47	Please provide the estimated timeframe when FLASHJET will be replaced by EMMA at NASK and NASM so bidders can adjust bids based on the workload and material data to be provided to the Govt.	EMMA is already installed at both Kingsville and Meridian.
S&P	48	Will the Government provide the filters for the paint booths?	Yes
PRES/DEPRES	49	Aircraft Preservation and De-Preservation. Does the Government own dehumidification equipment/bags/shelters? Will this equipment be provided as GFE?	No
TDs	50	Please define the workload requirements to complete all non-incorporated depot level TDs on a target of 40 aircraft annually.	TDs are being loaded into the competition library. TDs state total manhours and the Contractor is responsible for management of thru put.
TDs	51	Are bidders to include the completion of all non-incorporated depot level TDs into the price of the proposals? If yes, please provide the scope of the TD work to include labor (number of hours) and material for each year and the CLIN this work falls under to complete all non-incorporated depot level TDs on a target of 40 aircraft annually.	Estimated quantities to induct are annotated in Section B.
ENGINEERING SUPPORT	52	Please define what the contractor engineering role and how it differs from the FST.	T-45 Fleet Support will be provided by the T-45 FST. The Contractor will be required to provide the engineering support described in the PWS in support of the T-45 FST and Program Office. The intent is for the FST and Program Office to have additional resources to resolve issues that arise that may not have obvious or easy answers and requires further insight than the FST or Program Office might have.
ENGINEERING SUPPORT	53	For example, is the contractor expected to act as a full operational FST with regard to having the capability to perform comprehensive materials/metallurgical and failure analysis testing?	T-45 Fleet Support will be provided by the T-45 FST. The Contractor will be required to provide the engineering support described in the PWS in support of the T-45 FST and Program Office. The intent is for the FST and Program Office to have additional resources to resolve issues that arise that may not have obvious or easy answers and requires further insight than the FST or Program Office might have.
ENGINEERING SUPPORT	54	Please define the workload requirements for Engineering Support so bidders can understand how to staff this requirement.	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
ENGINEERING SUPPORT	55	Will Engineering support be required at each site, or can it be provided from a central location, or combination of on-site and central location?	Direct support to the T-45 sites will be provided by the T-45 FST. The Contractor will not be required to provide direct support to the sites, but will instead provide support to the FST and Program Office. On-site support is not required.
ENGINEERING SUPPORT	56	Will the Govt provide all OEM data required by contractor engineers?	The Government owns and maintains all publications related to the T-45 airframe maintenance and parts breakdowns, engine O-level maintenance, as well as O and I level pubs for those components listed on the ICRLS for each site as well as limited engineering drawings and specifications. Some Engineering, obsolescence and DMS efforts described in paragraphs 5.10 and 5.22 of this PWS, such as EI and ECP support, may require vendor/OEM support to provide the service or the necessary data rights/data rights agreements. PWS paragraph 5.22.1.1 states, "The Contractor shall establish, document, and maintain the necessary interface with aircraft OEM and component manufacturers to accomplish this requirement."
ENGINEERING SUPPORT	57	Will the Government provide all T-45 engineering drawings and specifications that might be needed for engineering support for this program?	The Government owns and maintains some Engineering Drawings and Specifications, however some Engineering, obsolescence and DMS efforts described in paragraphs 5.10 and 5.22 of this PWS, such as EI and ECP support, may require vendor/OEM support to provide the service or the necessary data rights/data rights agreements. PWS paragraph 5.22.1.1 states, "The Contractor shall establish, document, and maintain the necessary interface with aircraft OEM and component manufacturers to accomplish this requirement."
ENGINEERING SUPPORT	58	Please define the CLIN that will include the engineering requirement?	See Section B and C to sync CLINs to PWS paragraphs
ENGINEERING SUPPORT	59	Is the Govt the Engineering Authority for all aspects of the T-45 aircraft?	Yes. NAVAIR is the Engineering Authority for all aspects of the T-45 Aircraft.
ENGINEERING SUPPORT	60	What does the Govt own for use by contractor?	The Government owns and maintains all publications related to the T-45 airframe maintenance and parts breakdowns, engine O-level maintenance, as well as O and I level pubs for those components listed on the ICRLS for each site as well as limited engineering drawings and specifications. Some Engineering, obsolescence and DMS efforts described in paragraphs 5.10 and 5.22 of this PWS, such as EI and ECP support, may require vendor/OEM support to provide the service or the necessary data rights.
ENGINEERING SUPPORT	61	Please define how the contractor role differs from that of the FST. For example, 5.1.5.1 states that FST Jacksonville will provide P&E analysis for all items in 5.1.4.3.	T-45 Fleet Support will be provided by the T-45 FST. The Contractor will be required to provide the engineering support described in the PWS in support of the T-45 FST and Program Office. The intent is for the FST and Program Office to have additional resources provided by the contractor to resolve issues that arise that may not have obvious or easy answers and requires further insight than the FST or Program Office might have.
GOV PROVIDED SECTION PWS	62	Please provide a list of government provided equipment to include vehicles [(e.g. the vehicle(s) for supply runs from NASM to NASP], ground support equipment, and material handling equipment (forklifts, …).	The RFP attachments list what is Government provided.
GOV PROVIDED SECTION PWS	63	States "The Government will not provide office furnishing, office supplies, or office equipment." DRFP Attachment 8 lists many tables, chairs, bookshelves, …). Please clarify if the office items listed in Attachment 8 will be provided.	Furniture and related office items are now listed in Attachment 36 and they are GP "as-is" IAW FAR 52.245-2
GOV PROVIDED SECTION PWS	64	Please specially describe what I-level services, to include METCAL, will be provided by the Govt for NASM and NASK and where those services will be performed.timms	The Government will provide in lab and onsite METCAL support for NASK. The Government will provide onsite CAL IAW format 310 for NASM.
GOV PROVIDED SECTION PWS	65	Describe those functions not covered by Navy functions or other Navy contracts that bidders will be required to provide via commercial services so bidders can include this information in their pricing analysis.	This data is not available
G-1	66	1st paragraph. It appears that the 3rd line should read "CLINs 0x02 and 0x22 (Non-Flight hour Generated Maintenance and CNATRA PMF Performance Incentive)" vice "CLINs 0x02 and 0x21 (Non-Flight hour Generated Maintenane and CNATRA PMF Performance Incentive)". Please clarify	Corrected
H-4	67	Flight Hour Generated Maintenance and Flight Operations Support. This section limits the contractor to billing for only actual hours flown. This limitation appears to be more appropriate to a Cost Reimbursable CLIN than to a FFP CLIN. Bidders will be providing FFP pricing based on the estimated flight hours provided by the Government. Should the FHs drop, the contractor, under the current wording, has no ability to adjust cost per FH pricing which may change depending on the magnitude of the change in FHs. Recommend the adding of a statement that allows for contract modification should the number of flight hours change by more than 10%.	CNATRA will not change the current methods of funding flight hours.
G-1 d) and PWS 5.4	68	“In the event the Engine Contractor disagrees with the decision to remove the engine and the engine is determined to be an “A-799,” the Contractor shall adjust the CLIN XXXX invoice amount downward for the month of occurrence to account for the cost of the Engine Contractor’s effort to determine the No Defect, IAW Section H of this contract as follows: 48 labor hours x Over and Above O-, I-Level labor rate (CLIN XXXX) = adjustment.” There is no mention of Contractor reimbursement for a faulty engine obtained from the Engine Contractor requiring troubleshooting and repair or removal from the aircraft. Would the Government consider requiring the Engine Contractor to reimburse the Contractor for engine work resulting from receipt of a faulty engine?	No
CLIN XX03	69	Program Management Efforts will need to be pre-allocated among all CLINS. Would the Government consider adding "SLIN XX03AD Program Management Office"?	The Government decided not to ID a single PM line item.
PWS 5.1.8.1.4 and 5.1.8.1.5.1.	70	Please breakout the IMP and S&P events for individual sites (NASK, NASM) so bidders can properly staff each site.	The Government does not intend to provide a breakout of IMP and S&P events by site because: (1) IMP events are flight hour driven events with intervals of 3000 FH and (2) S&P events are performed every 5 years. The contractor is to schedule and manage teh Depot-line throughput.
Parts & Material History T45Parts_OP-20Funding_08-D-0014(Fy04-12)” file	71	Please explain what the Sweep-up Funding (~$13.1M) and Additional Funding ($9.6M) as used for. Was this funding needed to perform maintenance that may have been under funded or under bid in CY12 or earlier?	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
Parts & Material History T45Parts_OP-20Funding_08-D-0014(Fy04-12)” file	72	Is this funding indicative of a problem area that will impact the future contractor either in terms of labor or material requirements?	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
Indirect Business Expenses	73	Please define ancillary equipment.	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
Indirect Business Expenses	74	Please define "support materials" and provide historic or estimated usage data on the replacement costs for support materials so all bidders can understand how to price this material.	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
SCA clause/CBA/AWD	75	The Boeing CBA does not identify which specific labor categories are performing the T-45 work at NASPR. The CBA does not provide sufficient information regarding the specific wage rates for the personnel supporting the T-45 work at NASPR. In addition, no information was provided regarding the workforce demographics to properly determine the fringe benefit costs. The requirement to comply with the CBA for at least one year requires that bidders understand the costs in order to correctly use those costs for proposal pricing. If the information below cannot be made available, please provide a copy of the Area Wage Determination bidders should use to determine appropriate wage rates. In order to preclude requests for equitable adjustments shortly after contract award, please provide the following for T-45 work being performed at NASPR under the Boeing CBA.	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
SCA clause/CBA/AWD	76	a. All labor classifications performing T-45 work.	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
SCA clause/CBA/AWD	77	b. All job descriptions negotiated between the Union and company.	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
SCA clause/CBA/AWD	78	c. The current actual individual wage rates by labor category for each CBA employee currently performing T-45 work.	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
SCA clause/CBA/AWD	79	d. All applicable Summary Plan descriptions for insurance and retirement suport offered to the incumbent CBA workforce and the cost sharing split between employees and the employer for each plan.	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
SCA clause/CBA/AWD	80	e. Any additional CBA supplemental LOAs or MOUs in effect that have not yet been provided to bidders.	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
SCA clause/CBA/AWD	81	f. Please also provide CBA seniority data for all four sites so bidders can correctly price fringe costs such as vacation time which varies with seniority.	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
SCA clause/CBA/AWD	82	Please explain why the Area Wage Determination for NASP is an odd numbered AWD while the other three are even numbered AWDs.	See response in the post-conference version of feedback responses.
CLIN 0X20	83	a. Please define how the Cost Plus Incentive Fee is to be bid and the metrics by which the incentive fee is determined.

B. Please define the SLINs in the table.	CPIF is no longer the plan for Material CLINs
	H	84	Can we assume that the reference to reimbursable travel outside a 50-mile radius applies to the "office" or work location, of the traveling employee?	From the MOB.
	PWS 5.1.4.3.1	85	Repairs Due to Crash Damage. In the competition library, a series of Daily Status Reports were included that provided status of aircraft through mid-2010 at NAS Kingsville. Within the most recent report provided (23 July 2010) the status report lists four aircraft that have been mishap damaged, one of which is now nearing its fifth year since mishap. Does the Government anticipate that funding will be available to support the restoration of these aircraft in the near future?	Funding is dependant on future budgets.
	PWS	86	Will there be a streamlining section to this PWS?	Government is not clear on the question as written.
	INDUSTRY DAY	87	When will the Industry Day be held? Will bidders be able to see the PAX piece of the RFP requirement?	Industry Day was held on December 2011. PWS Section 11 has the NAS Pax River requirements.
	ADMINISTRATION	88	ACO Location. Where will the office of the ACO be located? Can we assume CNATRA (not DCMA) will administer this contract?	ACOs will work for DCMA and will be on-site at CNATRA, as well as in the home DCMA office. CNATRA does not have an ACO, but will have Contract Administrators supporting the DCMA ACO.

&D T45CLS Draft RFP Feedback (Prior to Pre-Solicitation Conference) N00019-12-R-0001

Page &P

PMF Clause

		PMF INCENTIVE CLAUSE H-1
	H-1 Incentive Clause Reference		Industry Questions	Government Response
	H-1 3.0	1	This paragraph states that the "lowest average OTAA and SCR rates achieved will be used to then calculate the performance factor as shown below."
Are the averages calculated by site or across all sites? E.g., the lowest OTAA and SCR average values at a single site or lowest SCR at any given site and the lowest OTAA at any other site?	Calculated by site and the lowest at any site will be used.
	H-1	2	Please confirm that NALCOMIS is used to track and evaluate all PMF metrics.	OTAA/SCR - TIMS; SLMM & FLE - OOMA/NALCOMIS; QUALITY - CNATRAINST 4355.4A; SAFETY - WESS & CNATRAINST 4355.4A
	H-1, 4.1.3.2	3	States "Any aircraft exceeding the Maximum Utilization Rate (MUR) for the previous quarter evaluation period is not eligible for SLMMESA, except as outlined in paragraphs 4.1.3.1 and 4.1.3.2 of this clause". The last part of this sentence appears to contradict the first part by saying that all that meet 4.3.1 definitions will be counted as SLMMESA. Please clarify with some examples that show when aircraft are not eligible for SLMMESA status.	All references to MUR in DRFP have been removed.
	H-1, 4.1.5.1	4	Aircraft granted SLMMESA status, any time during the quarterly evaluation period, are not SLMMAA and exempted from FHAVG calculation. What happens if an aircraft is taken out of SLMMESA status during quarter?	H-1, 3.1.4.2 of DRFP describes how SLMMESA will be prorated.
	H-1, 4.3	5	Max Utilization Rate (MUR) Sustainment Measure. Please provide by quarter for the last two years, how many aircraft were at or above the MUR level so bidders can understand the risk associated with this metric. If MUR was not measured over the last two years, please provide the Government's best estimate of number of aircraft by quarter over the last two years that would have caused the contractor to be evaluated at a sustainment measure of zero for equaling or exceeding MUR levels.	All references to MUR in DRFP have been removed
	H-1, Example Calculation 4.4.2	6	4.4.2 shows the subtraction of 1000FH. What does the 1000FH represent? Is this the amount of FH flown by the SLMMESA?	Corrected
	H-1, 4.5.4.1	7	Desired FLE Rate. Please identify the average number of aircraft by site over the last 2 years by quarter that average greater or less than 10% of the DFLER of 4.63% so bidders can understand the risk involved.	DRFP no longer references DFLER
	H-1, 4.5.5.1	8	Desired FLE Rate Range. Since the biggest concern is having a DFRR that is above the 4.63% rate, shouldn't the DFRR be only plus 10% vice plus or minus 10%?	DRFP no longer references DFLER
	H-1, Table 4-2	9	Please define the word "trending". Please verify that FLER (delta) is used to measure "trending".	RFP no longer references DFLER. Term "trending" is no longer used.
	H-1, 4.8.4	10	Please explain why the formula adds (1) to the DFLER of 32 to get 33? Shouldn't the calculation be: (32/40)(100)?	RFP no longer references DFLER.
	H-1, 4.9.3.1	11	Desired Arrestment Rate Range (DARR). Since the biggest concern is having a DARR that is above the 7.08% ragte, shouldn't the DFRR be only plus 10% vice plus or minus 10%?"	RFP no longer references DARR.
	H-1, AR Table 4-3	12	Please define the word "trending". Please verify that AR (delta) is used to measure "trending".	RFP no longer references AR (delta). Term "trending" is no longer used.
	H-1, 4.10	13	AR Sustainment Measure. Please provide by quarter for the last two years, the sites that were below or equal to the MARP so bidders can understand the risk associated with this metric. If MARP was not measured over the last two years, please provide the Government's best estimate of sites by quarter over the last two years that would have caused the contractor to be evaluated at a sustainment measure of zero for being below or equaling MARP levels.	RFP no longer references MARP
	H-1, 4.11.4	14	Please explain why the formula adds (1) to the DAR of 24 to get 25? Shouldn't the calculation be: (24/30)(100)?	RFP no longer references DAR.
	PWS 5.2

H-1, 1.5 H-1, 1.6 H-1, 1.7

15	We understand the Government's use of incentives and disincentives to avoid disruption to the mission and optimize contractor performance. The draft fee structure is imbalanced and introduces financial risk to potential bidders. While the incentive fee allows for incremental increases the disincentive fee is not proportionally balanced using an "all or nothing" approach. Given the heavy penalities that will be imposed, would the Government consider the below graduated aggregate incentive and disincentive formula provided as Alternative I and the proportioned incentive/disincentive structure provided as Alternative II. This assumes that the same formulas and performance metrics are used and that no contractor safety of flight violations occurred during the evaluation period.	Noted. The PMF will remain as stated in the RFP. Disincentive will be a cliff to stress importance of the required metrics.
		Aggregate Performance Incentive (Alternative 1)

>95.0 - 100 >94.0 - 98 >93.0 - 96 >92.0 - 94 >91.0 - 92 >90.0 - 90 85.0-90.0 0 <84 - (90) <83 - (92) <82 - (94) <81 - (96) <80 - (98) <79 - (100) Proportioned Incentive (Alternative 2) Maintain Performance Incentive in accordance with Section H-1, paragraph 1.4.1; 20% Performance; 20% Sustainment; 30% Safety; and 30% Quality.

Afterward, subdivide the $2.5M incentive/disincentive allocation into four (4) individual award pools, i.e., Quality and Safety would be valued at $750K each; Performance and Sustainment would be valued at $500K each.

Then using the current award formula's and ground rules calculate each performance metric for each award pool and determine respective incentive/disincentive amount. Subsequently, determine the aggregate incentive/disincentive contractor allocation.

This concept reduces catastrophic risk to the contractor and will result in reduced cost proposed by the offerors to the Government. Additionally, we believe such an incentive/disincentive structure will promote increased competition and provides risk mitigation for service providers which can lower the Government's cost. As it is currently structured many organization's industry will be reluctant to participate or will price significant financial risk mitigation, which drives up the cost to the Government.

&D T45CLS Draft RFP Feedback (Prior to Pre-Solicitation Conference) N00019-12-R-0001

L&M

L & M Reference		Industry Questions	Government Response
Past Performance Relevancy	1	Request NAVAIR indicate to what extent relevant experience by an affiliate of a bidding organization may be presented for consideration, irrespective of whether or not that affiliate is directly participating in the work.	See Section L, 4.3.a

2 there may be an error in Table 3.2 wrt the assigned number of the row under Manpower Management for Manning. Under the row for 2.4 | Manpower Management, perhaps it should say 2.4.1 for Manning instead of 2.1.4. The numbering has been updated.

&D T45CLS Draft RFP Feedback (Prior to Pre-Solicitation Conference) N00019-12-R-0001

Already Addressed in DRFP

	The below questions or comments were received and already addressed in the Draft RFP. No further action is required for the Final RFP.
	Document/Section Reference		Industry Questions	Government Response
	H-1 PMF Clause	1	Please provide Section H and associated data (appendices, attachments, workload data) for early review and comment
	H-1, 1.4.2	2	Believe the incentive should be CLIN 0X22 vice CLIN OX21.
	H-1, 6.1.2.2.2 and 6.1.2.2.3	3	Please verify that each of these should be less than or equal to (<) to include the numbers 3 and 5 respectively.
	PWS/CDRL	4	There are numerous Plans addressed in the PWS. Please identify when each Plan must be submitted to the Government.	See Section L for plans to be submitted with proposals or CDRLs for all others.
	PWS	5	Flight Crew Members. What parameters will be established / defined for the additional support identified in this area? Does the flight crews number refer to FCF?	PWS paragraph 5.14.21.2 addresses Contractor FCF pilot requirements.
		6	Please provide Enclosure 3 early so bidders can review and evaluate.	PWS Enclosures were changed to Attachments and released with the DRFP.
		7	Please provide copies of the current CBAs.	CBAs were released with the DRFP and are also posted on the competition library.
	Attachment 2 & 4	8	Attachments 2 and 4 provide explanation and direction for submissions of CDRLS. When will the actual CDRLs be published?
	Line Items N00019-12-R-0001
8.10.2012 Excel Workbook	9	Please define the differences between CLINS 0X07 and 0X08.
	Pg 3-4	10	Please define all CLINS not already defined. Please define the contract type for CLIN 0x16.
	PWS 2.2.1	11	Estimated Flight Hour Table. The note states "Prior to option exercise for FY19, FY20 estimated flight hours will be provided". Will bidders be required to provide pricing for FY19 and FY20? If yes, please provide the estimated Flight Hours for FY 19 and FY20 so bidders can determine CLIN 0X01.	PWS paragraph 3. addresses estimated flight hours at all sites.
	Section B, CLIN 0002	12	CLIN 0002 contains 21 SLINS covering various RFT sortie band levels by NAS. The majority of these SLINS are options that NAVAIR may select to cover surge activity, and those bands requiring higher numbers of planes are likely not to be exercised as frequently.

Does the Government intend to select one SLIN for each NAS to use as part of its price evaluation process, and if so, are those SLINs likely to be ones that reflect everyday activity? Or does the Government intend to evlauate all 21 SLINs as a whole, which in our opinion result in the Government incurring additional time and expense in the evaluation process. If the Government elects the latter, how will the Government account for "lowballing", i.e., when a contractor proposes unreasonably low unit pricing for higher bands that will unlikely be exercised, with the intent to lower the total evaluated price?	SLINS for each RFT band per site were removed and now a Monthly FFP is to be proposed to cover any RFT Band selected for each site. See Section B of Draft RFP. RFT Band selection will be noted in applicable TO.
		13	Hazardous Material, Environmental POC for NASPR. Does the USG have a POC for this?	Yes. See clause
	F-1	14	F-1 a. states the transition phase-in will be 75 days. PWS Pg 39, 5.14.1.1 states the contractor will be afforded up to a 30 day observation period for transition phase-in. Please clarify the timeframe for the transition phase-in period.	PWS Section 5.14.1 has been rewritten for clarification. Transition phase-in period: seventy-five (75) calendar days. Includes 45 days to observe operations and interface with incumbent during next 30 days of 75-day transition period
		15	Withhold. Can we assume the disincentive will be withheld against CLIN 0X02?	See Section G for withholds processed to account for PMF disincentive decrement
	CLIN XX01	16	CLIN XX01 includes T-45 Flight Hour Generated O and I-Level Aircraft Maintenance (scheduled and unscheduled) and Flight Operations Support.

A. Please provide a definition of Flight Operations Support.

B. We are assuming Flight Hour Generated O and I-Level maintenance is limited to Phase and other Hourly Inspections (as identified in Cards 56-70 of the PMIC). Is that a correct assumption?	See PWS and Section C
		17	Recommend the Government add Clause 52-245-1.
	PWS 5.1.1.2	18	Scheduled Inspection/Preventive Maintenance. Does the CLS contractor or the Engine contractor have responsibility for the preservation of uninstalled engines?	PWS para 5.1.1.22.1 states The Contractor shall remove and preserve engines from aircraft not flown for 90 days.
	PWS 5.1.1.2.2	19	PWS Paragraph 5.1.1.22 addresses Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) for Non-flyable Aircraft. It states that “Thirty (30) days after last flight, the Contractor shall provide a POA&M (CDRL XXXX) for aircraft deemed non-flyable, describing the plan to return such aircraft to flyable within 75 days of that last flight. If the 75 day provision is evaluated and deemed not plausible by the Government, justification must be added and authorized by the ACO.” PWS Paragraph 11.2.7 addresses Long Term Down A/C and states “If an aircraft has not flown for 90 or more days, the Contractor shall produce and deliver a Long Term Down Aircraft Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) (CDRL XXXX). The Long Term Down Aircraft POA&M shall detail the Contractor’s plan for flying the aircraft by 120 days from the aircraft’s last flight. If the 120 day provision is not possible, the Contractor shall provide justification to the COR for approval. These paragraphs seem to conflict with each other. Request the Government provide clarification concerning paragraph requirements.	PWS Paragraph 5.1.1.22 addresses long term down aircraft for NASK, NASM, NASP. PWS paragraph 11.2.7 addresses long term down aircraft at NAS Pax River.
	PWS 5.1.6.2.8	20	PWS Paragraph 5.1.6.2.8 requires the contractor to “Maintain Practice Multiple Bomb Rack (PMBR) IAW Enclosure 3, Applicable Documents, of this Contract.” Request the Government verify the requirement to maintain the Practice Multiple Bomb Rack (PMBR). Currently the BRU-38 is in use.	PWS para 5.1.6.2.8 has been updated and the requirement states the Contractor shall maintain BRU-38 and Practice Multiple Bomb Rack (PMBR).
	PWS 5.1.7	21	I-Level Maintenance. Need description of I-Level capability currently offered at Pensacola.	Attachment 7 is NASP's ICRL.
	Pg 10, 5.1.7.1	22	States "The Contractor shall disassemble, assemble, service, and test tire and wheel components." PWS Pg 55, 73.19 states "T-45 I-Level Maintenance at NASP - The T-45 Maintenance Contractor at NASP will receive I-Level maintenance support from the local AIMD contract. NASP AIMD will provide I-Level maintenance for the T-45 battery, tire & wheel buildup, ejection seat pan, survival kit, Aviation Life Support System (ALSS), parachute, limited airframe support (as required and directed by the Government) and Non-Destructive Inspection (NDI) support." Please clarify if NASP will perform tire and wheel build up at NASP AIMD or if this will be a contractor requirement.	Attachment 7 is NASP's ICRL. The ICRL defines repair capability that exists.
	PWS 5.1.8.1.3	23	Draft RFP CLIN XX07 indicates that IMP1 and IMP2 events are to be bid at a FFP with an annotation in "Red", that says (Labor Only).

A. Regarding the "look" phase of an IMP 1 and 2. The IMP specficiation does not discuss current time standards for those inspections. Would the government please provide information as to how long those inspections have taken in the past?

B. Regarding the "fix" phase of an IMP1 and IMP2. The current IMP spec (Paragraph 3-1) requires that IMP discrepancies be documented within AV-3M. Could the government release relevant man-hour data for discrepancies found in past IMP1 and IMP2 inspections.

C. If material is to be part of the FFP CLIN, please provide representative data from past IMP inspections as to cost of material required to complete repairs.

D. We anticipate completing some technical directives during IMP. Would those directives be included in the FFP or separately priced under CLIN XX10?	Section B has been updated and was released in the DRFP. Questions A-C: This is to be competively proposed based off of the IMP spec loacated on competition library. Question D: Unplanned TDs cannot be charged to the FFP of an IMP event. Manhours associated with unplanned TDs will be charged to CLIN 0X10 and Depot O&A CLIN IAW PWS & Section C.
	PWS 5.1.8.5.1	24	a. Recommend changing the title from "Estimated number if IMP aircraft" to "Estimated number of S&P aircraft"
b. Please provide a breakout of estimated S&P events between NASK and NASM for each year to include a breakout of the number of FLASHJET vs the number of EMMA events at each site per year (See question for 5.15.8.6).	PWS has been updated and changing the titles from estimated number of IMP to S&P aircraft is no longer valid. This chart was removed from the PWS.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.