J.33 PSDI II Technical Approach Evaluation Worksheets.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 234 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Power Systems Design & Install 2
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-26-R-00018
About this file
This file is a detailed technical evaluation workbook for a Power Systems Design & Install contract opportunity, containing comprehensive scoring criteria for design and installation across multiple electrical system categories. The evaluation covers six primary system categories: Alternative Energy Systems (AES), Engine Generators (EG), Electrical Distribution (ELD), Fuel Storage Tanks (FST), Uninterruptible Power Systems (UPS), and Combined Power Distribution Systems (CPDS), with three complexity levels (Categories 1-3) for each.
The evaluation methodology requires offerors to demonstrate technical competence through design and installation proposals, with strict scoring criteria across multiple subcategories. Proposals are evaluated on specific technical requirements such as system sizing, component specifications, installation methods, temporary system management, cutover plans, startup procedures, and compliance with industry standards like NEC, OSHA, and FAA specifications. To qualify, offerors must score at least 60% in each subcategory, with automatic disqualification for failing to meet specific key requirements. The comprehensive scoring matrix assesses everything from electrical system design and mechanical integration to power analysis, control systems, and project management capabilities.
View the file
Other files
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Cover Sheet
| PSDI II Technical Evaluation Workbook | ||||
| Evaluator Name: | ||||
| Offeror Name: | ||||
| Date: | ||||
| Factors | Sub-Factor(s) | Program Area(s) | Evaluator Rating | Link to Tab |
| 1 – Design Proposal | 1.1 – Category 1 | AES | Not Qualified | D-C1-AES |
| EG | Not Qualified | D-C1-EG | ||
| ELD | Not Qualified | D-C1-ELD | ||
| FST | Not Qualified | D-C1-FST | ||
| UPS | Not Qualified | D-C1-UPS | ||
| 1.2 – Category 2 | AES | Not Qualified | D-C2-AES | |
| CPDS | Not Qualified | D-C2-CPDS | ||
| EG | Not Qualified | D-C2-EG | ||
| ELD | Not Qualified | D-C2-ELD | ||
| FST | Not Qualified | D-C2-FST | ||
| UPS | Not Qualified | D-C2-UPS | ||
| 1.3 – Category 3 | AES | Not Qualified | D-C3-AES | |
| CPDS | Not Qualified | D-C3-CPDS | ||
| EG | Not Qualified | D-C3-EG | ||
| ELD | Not Qualified | D-C3-ELD | ||
| FST | Not Qualified | D-C3-FST | ||
| UPS | Not Qualified | D-C3-UPS | ||
| 2 – Installation Proposal | 2.1– Category 1 | AES | Not Qualified | I-C1-AES |
| EG | Not Qualified | I-C1-EG | ||
| ELD | Not Qualified | I-C1-ELD | ||
| FST | Not Qualified | I-C1-FST | ||
| UPS | Not Qualified | I-C1-UPS | ||
| 2.2 – Category 2 | AES | Not Qualified | I-C2-AES | |
| CPDS | Not Qualified | I-C2-CPDS | ||
| EG | Not Qualified | I-C2-EG | ||
| ELD | Not Qualified | I-C2-ELD | ||
| FST | Not Qualified | I-C2-FST | ||
| UPS | Not Qualified | I-C2-UPS | ||
| 2.3 – Category 3 | AES | Not Qualified | I-C3-AES | |
| CPDS | Not Qualified | I-C3-CPDS | ||
| EG | Not Qualified | I-C3-EG | ||
| ELD | Not Qualified | I-C3-ELD | ||
| FST | Not Qualified | I-C3-FST | ||
| UPS | Not Qualified | I-C3-UPS | ||
| 3 – Key Personnel | ||||
| Passing Score | 60% | |||
| Scores will be calculated for each applicable factor and sub-factor based on a minimum pass threshold of 60%. The overall score for each section will be determined by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions. If the resulting percentage is 60% or greater, the Offeror will be rated “Qualified” for that program area section. If the resulting percentage falls below 60%, the Offeror will receive a rating of “Not-Qualified” for that program area section. |
D-C1-AES
| *If the answer is "NO" for this question, stop evaluation and rate this subfactor program area "Not Qualified" | |||||
| AES Category 1 Design | Additional Notes | ||||
| 1 | Scope | Yes (Y) or No (N) | 1 | Scope | |
| 1 | 1.1 | *Did the submitted project include at least one (1) photovoltaic/battery energy storage system or a standalone battery energy storage system with a capacity ranging from 1 kW to 50 kW? | 1.1 | ||
| 2 | 1.2 | Did the design package include sequenced drawings that illustrate how the system and associated components will be electrically designed in accordance with the SOW, FAA specifications, and standards and/or industry standards listed in Section 2.5 as applicable? | 1.2 | ||
| 2 | Temporary System | 2 | Temporary System | ||
| 3 | 2.1 | Did the design package include a detailed temporary system one-line diagram and layout to integrate the temporary system into the existing facility and guide the installation contractor? | 2.1 | ||
| 3 | Demolition | 3 | Demolition | ||
| 4 | 3.1 | Did the design package provide a demolition plan that includes demolition drawings that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project? | 3.1 | ||
| 4 | Photovoltaic / Battery Energy Storage System stand alone Battery Energy | 4 | Photovoltaic / Battery Energy Storage System stand alone Battery Energy | ||
| 5 | 4.1 | Did the design package describe how the energy resources (photovoltaic/battery energy storage system, standalone battery energy storage system, wind turbine, and fuel cell as applicable) were sized for the project, including whether specifications from the facility owner, a load study, manufacturer-provided sizing software, or other methods were used? | 4.1 | ||
| 5 | Electrical | 5 | Electrical | ||
| 6 | 5.1 | Did the design package show a new or existing panel schedule(s)? | 5.1 | ||
| 7 | 5.2 | Did the design package include and show compliance with the applicable NEC, OSHA, and FAA standards, specifications, and orders, and/or industry standards listed in Section 2.5 as applicable? | 5.2 | ||
| 8 | 5.3 | Did the design package show an existing and/or new one-line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system? | 5.3 | ||
| 9 | 5.4 | Did the design package provide a detailed cable and conduit schedule? | 5.4 | ||
| 10 | 5.5 | Did the design package provide a detailed equipment layout that shows where the new equipment will be installed with equipment clearances compliant with NEC, OSHA and FAA orders, standards and specifications as applicable? | 5.5 | ||
| 6 | System Monitoring | 6 | System Monitoring | ||
| 11 | 6.1 | Did the design package include local connections for Modbus, preferably Modbus TCP/IP, functioning as a Modbus server (follower), as well as supply Modbus data concerning connection parameters and register mapping for all relevant system components/units? | 6.1 | ||
| 12 | 6.2 | Did the design package provide control drawings that include network diagrams and block diagrams showing overall system integration? | 6.2 | ||
| 7 | Mechanical | 7 | Mechanical | ||
| 13 | 7.1 | Did the design package include detailed mechanical drawings demonstrating that the energy resources (PV array, and standalone battery energy storage system) comply with industry standards, international and local codes? | 7.1 | ||
| 14 | 7.2 | Did the mechanical drawings show detailed system connections, mounting points, and vibration isolation as required to build a fully functioning system to industry standards, international and local code compliant? | 7.2 | ||
| 8 | Power Analysis | 8 | Power Analysis | ||
| 15 | 8.1 | Did the submitted power analysis studies report or protective device coordination analysis (PDCA) demonstrate a properly coordinated system in multiple operating scenarios and system configurations? | 8.1 | ||
| 16 | 8.2 | Did the submitted Short Circuit Analysis within the design analyze the possible fault currents in the electrical system during short circuit and compare them to the power distribution equipment ratings to determine if they can withstand/interrupt maximum faults? | 8.2 | ||
| 17 | 8.3 | Did the submitted power analysis studies report or arc flash risk assessment (AFRA) identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design? | 8.3 |
| Total Points Received ( Total Number of Yes Response) | 0 | ||
| Total Number of Questions | 17 | General Notes | |
| Score | 0% | ||
| Final Category Rating | Not Qualified | ||
| Scores will be calculated for each applicable factor and sub-factor based on a minimum pass threshold of 60%. The overall score for each section will be determined by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions. If the resulting percentage is 60% or greater, the Offeror will be rated “Qualified” for that program area section. If the resulting percentage falls below 60%, the Offeror will receive a rating of “Not-Qualified” for that program area section. |
Return to Cover Sheet
D-C1-EG
| *If the answer is "NO" for this question, stop evaluation and rate this subfactor program area "Not Qualified" | |||||
| EG Category 1 Design | Additional Notes | ||||
| 1 | Scope | Yes (Y) or No (N) | 1 | Scope | |
| 1 | 1.1 | *Did the submitted project include an engine generator sized 20 kW or larger? | 1.1 | ||
| 2 | 1.2 | Does the design package include drawings of the key phases of construction (for example: temporary system connection, demolition, and EG/associated equipment installation)? | 1.2 | ||
| 3 | 1.3 | Did the design package convey an understanding of the FAA specifications, standards, and orders listed in the SOW Sections 2.2 - 2.4, and/or industry standards listed in Section 2.5 as applicable? | 1.3 | ||
| 2 | Temporary System | 2 | Temporary System | ||
| 4 | 2.1 | Did the design package include a one-line diagram outlining the electrical configuration for the site when temporary equipment (for example: EG, ATS, cables, disconnect switch) is connected? | 2.1 | ||
| 3 | Demolition | 3 | Demolition | ||
| 5 | 3.1 | Did the design package provide a demolition plan that includes demolition drawings that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project? | 3.1 | ||
| 4 | Equipment | 4 | Equipment | ||
| 6 | 4.1 | Did the design package describe how the EG was selected for the project (specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer provided sizing software, etc)? | 4.1 | ||
| 7 | 4.2 | Did the design package show a control wiring diagram that outlines the required control circuits for the EG? | 4.2 | ||
| 8 | 4.3 | Did the design package or data handbook include key details (size, model, general specs/cutsheet) for the new EG being installed, and demonstrate compliance with NEC, OSHA, and industry standards? | 4.3 | ||
| 9 | 4.4 | Did the design package or data handbook include key details (size, model, general specs/cutsheet) for the new ancillary equipment being installed (for example: ATS, load bank), and demonstrate compliance with NEC, OSHA, and industry standards? | 4.4 | ||
| 10 | 4.5 | Did the design package provide a cutover plan describing the manufacturer's testing method for the EG and required site preparation for startup? | 4.5 | ||
| 5 | Electrical | 5 | Electrical | ||
| 11 | 5.1 | Did the Design Package show a new or existing panel schedule(s)? | 5.1 | ||
| 12 | 5.2 | Did the design package show an existing and/or new one-line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system? | 5.2 | ||
| 13 | 5.3 | Did the design package provide a detailed cable and conduit schedule? | 5.3 | ||
| 14 | 5.4 | Did the design package provide a detailed equipment layout that shows where the new equipment will be installed with equipment clearances compliant with NEC, OSHA and FAA orders, standards and specifications as applicable? | 5.4 | ||
| 6 | Monitor and Control | 6 | Monitor and Control | ||
| 15 | 6.1 | Did the design package show a control wiring diagram that outlines the required control circuits for the EG, ATS and load bank, as applicable? | 6.1 | ||
| 7 | Mechanical | 7 | Mechanical | ||
| 16 | 7.1 | Did the design package include drawings depicting the exhaust system for the EG (for example: duct selection/details, hood selection/details, exhaust fan breakdown, duct support, muffler connection, thimble connection, muffler mounting, and muffler insulation)? | 7.1 | ||
| 8 | Power Analysis | 8 | Power Analysis | ||
| 17 | 8.1 | Did the submitted power analysis studies report or protective device coordination analysis (PDCA) demonstrate a properly coordinated system in multiple operating scenarios and system configurations? | 8.1 | ||
| 13 | 8.2 | Did the submitted Short Circuit Analysis within the design analyze the possible fault currents in the electrical system during short circuit and compare them to the power distribution equipment ratings to determine if they can withstand/interrupt maximum faults? | 8.2 | ||
| 14 | 8.3 | Did the submitted Arc Flash Risk Assessment (AFRA) identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design? | 8.3 |
| Total Points Received ( Total Number of Yes Response) | 0 | ||
| Total Number of Questions | 14 | General Notes | |
| Score | 0% | ||
| Final Category Rating | Not Qualified | ||
| Scores will be calculated for each applicable factor and sub-factor based on a minimum pass threshold of 60%. The overall score for each section will be determined by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions. If the resulting percentage is 60% or greater, the Offeror will be rated “Qualified” for that program area section. If the resulting percentage falls below 60%, the Offeror will receive a rating of “Not-Qualified” for that program area section. |
Return to Cover Sheet
D-C1-ELD
| *If the answer is "NO" for this question, stop evaluation and rate this subfactor program area "Not Qualified" | |||||
| ELD Category 1 Design | Additional Notes | ||||
| 1 | Scope | Yes (Y) or No (N) | 1 | Scope | |
| 1 | 1.1 | *Did the design package clearly indicate new work including a minimum of 500 ft of concrete-encased or at least 500 ft of direct burial of low voltage conduit systems? | 1.1 | ||
| 2 | 1.2 | Did the design package clearly indicate the testing of single phase 600v rated low voltage power cable as part of the new work? | 1.2 | ||
| 3 | 1.3 | Did the design package clearly indicate the inclusion of low-voltage power cable and disconnect switches for one of more loads? | 1.3 | ||
| 4 | 1.4 | Did the design package include electrical installation details that provided sufficient information for proper installation? | 1.4 | ||
| 5 | 1.5 | Did the design package provide an airport or field layout that shows cable and conduit and/or trenching routes? | 1.5 | ||
| 6 | 1.6 | Did the design package clearly show the inclusion of low-voltage cables as part of the new work? | 1.6 | ||
| 2 | Demolition | 2 | Demolition | ||
| 7 | 2.1 | Did the Design Package provide a demolition plan that includes demolition drawings that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project? | 2.1 | ||
| 3 | Electrical | 3 | Electrical | ||
| 8 | 3.1 | Did the design package provide a detailed cable and conduit schedule? | 3.1 | ||
| 9 | 3.2 | Did the design package provide a detailed equipment layout that shows where the new equipment will be installed with equipment clearances compliant with NEC, OSHA and FAA orders, standards and specifications as applicable? | 3.2 | ||
| 10 | 3.3 | Did the design package show an existing and/or new one-line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system? | 3.3 | ||
| 4 | Power Analysis | 4 | Power Analysis | ||
| 11 | 4.1 | Did the Offeror's narrative describe experience with short circuit analysis, protective device coordination analysis, and arc flash risk assessment for low voltage circuits? | 4.1 | ||
| 12 | 4.2 | Did the submitted power analysis studies report or arc flash risk assessment (AFRA) identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design? | 4.2 |
| Total Points Received ( Total Number of Yes Response) | 0 | ||
| Total Number of Questions | 12 | ||
| Score | 0% | General Notes | |
| Final Category Rating | Not Qualified | ||
| Scores will be calculated for each applicable factor and sub-factor based on a minimum pass threshold of 60%. The overall score for each section will be determined by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions. If the resulting percentage is 60% or greater, the Offeror will be rated “Qualified” for that program area section. If the resulting percentage falls below 60%, the Offeror will receive a rating of “Not-Qualified” for that program area section. |
Return to Cover Sheet
D-C1-FST
| *If the answer is "NO" for this question, stop evaluation and rate this subfactor program area "Not Qualified" | |||||
| FST Category 1 Design | Additional Notes | ||||
| 1 | Scope | Yes (Y) or No (N) | 1 | Scope | |
| 1 | 1.1 | *Did the submitted project include a fuel storage tank (FST), sized 250 gallons or larger, with fuel storage monitoring? | 1.1 | ||
| 2 | 1.2 | Did the submitted drawings clearly show the sequence of removal of the existing FST and the phased integration of the new FST, fuel piping, and monitoring system, as applicable? | 1.2 | ||
| 3 | 1.3 | Did the design package include all required civil, mechanical, electrical, and demolition drawings to support the installation of the new FST, fuel piping, and fuel monitoring system as applicable? | 1.3 | ||
| 4 | 1.4 | Did the design package convey an understanding of the FAA specifications, standards, and orders listed in the SOW Sections 2.2 - 2.4, and/or industry standards listed in Section 2.5 as applicable? | 1.4 | ||
| 2 | Temporary System | 2 | Temporary System | ||
| 5 | 2.1 | Did the design package provide a detailed temporary system mechanical one-line diagram showing the temporary fuel tank, associated transfer pumps, and fuel oil supply/return piping? | 2.1 | ||
| 6 | 2.2 | Did the design package provide a detailed layout of the temporary fuel system showing the location of the UL-142 temporary fuel tank, secondary spill containment, and temporary fuel oil supply and return piping? | 2.2 | ||
| 3 | Demolition | 3 | Demolition | ||
| 7 | 3.1 | Did the design package provide a demolition plan that includes demolition drawings that clearly identify which components of the FST system will be removed and which will be retained as part of the project? | 3.1 | ||
| 8 | 3.2 | Did the design package provide a demolition plan that clearly shows the concrete/asphalt removal limits of disturbance? | 3.2 | ||
| 4 | Electrical | 4 | Electrical | ||
| 9 | 4.1 | Did the Design Package show a new or existing panel schedule(s)? | 4.1 | ||
| 10 | 4.2 | Did the design package provide a detailed cable and conduit schedule? | 4.2 | ||
| 11 | 4.3 | Did the design package provide a detailed equipment layout showing the location of new equipment and required clearances in compliance with NEC, NFPA 70, and OSHA standards? | 4.3 | ||
| 12 | 4.4 | Did the design package address required points of egress in accordance with NFPA 110? | 4.4 | ||
| 13 | 4.5 | Did the design package show grounding in accordance with NEC requirements for the FST system and associated equipment? | 4.5 | ||
| 14 | 4.6 | Did the design package provide an electrical plan and elevation views that show conduit runs and general routing of electrical wiring associated with the fuel monitoring? | 4.6 | ||
| 5 | Monitor and Control | 5 | Monitor and Control | ||
| 15 | 5.1 | Did the design package include a point-to-point wiring diagram showing all required FST monitoring connections? | 5.1 | ||
| 16 | 5.2 | Did the design package describe new FST monitoring systems and/or interconnections to existing monitoring systems (e.g. remote monitoring systems)? | 5.2 | ||
| 17 | 5.3 | Did the design package show a fuel storage monitoring wiring diagram that outlines all of the required circuits for the system to operate? | 5.3 | ||
| 6 | Mechanical | 6 | Mechanical | ||
| 18 | 6.1 | Did the design package provide a mechanical plan and elevation views that show the FST and associated equipment? | 6.1 | ||
| 19 | 6.2 | Did the design package include detailed mechanical drawings for the installation of a fully functional, code-compliant fuel system, including the fuel storage tank, fuel piping, vents, and associated mechanical equipment? | 6.2 | ||
| 20 | 6.3 | Did the design package show an existing and/or new one-line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system? | 6.3 | ||
| 7 | Civil | 7 | Civil | ||
| 21 | 7.1 | Did the design package provide civil site drawings indicating access to the site, facility property boundaries, site security controls (e.g. fences and gates), buildings and structures on the site, and types of ground cover (e.g. grass, gravel, asphalt, and concrete)? | 7.1 |
| Total Points Received ( Total Number of Yes Response) | 0 | General Notes | |
| Total Number of Questions | 21 | ||
| Score | 0% | ||
| Final Category Rating | Not Qualified | ||
| Scores will be calculated for each applicable factor and sub-factor based on a minimum pass threshold of 60%. The overall score for each section will be determined by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions. If the resulting percentage is 60% or greater, the Offeror will be rated “Qualified” for that program area section. If the resulting percentage falls below 60%, the Offeror will receive a rating of “Not-Qualified” for that program area section. |
Return to Cover Sheet
D-C1-UPS
| *If the answer is "NO" for this question, stop evaluation and rate this subfactor program area "Not Qualified" | |||||
| UPS Category 1 Design | Additional Notes | ||||
| 1 | Scope | Yes (Y) or No (N) | 1 | Scope | |
| 1 | 1.1 | *Did the submitted project include a UPS, sized 40 kVA or larger? | 1.1 | ||
| 2 | 1.2 | *Did the submitted project include a fuel storage tank (FST), sized 250 gallons or larger, with fuel storage monitoring? | 1.2 | ||
| 3 | 1.3 | Did the design package include electrical installation details that provide detailed electrical information necessary for installation? | 1.3 | ||
| 4 | 1.4 | Did the design package show a control wiring diagram that outlines all of the required control circuits for the system to operate? | 1.4 | ||
| 5 | 1.5 | Did the design package convey an understanding of the FAA specifications, standards, and orders listed in the SOW Sections 2.2 - 2.4, and/or industry standards listed in Section 2.5 as applicable? | 1.5 | ||
| 6 | 1.6 | Did the design package clearly indicate the installation of an external maintenance bypass that allows the UPS to be completely de-energized without interrupting the critical load? | 1.6 | ||
| 7 | 1.7 | Did the design package clearly indicate the installation of at least one critical branch panel downstream of the UPS? | 1.7 | ||
| 2 | Temporary System | 2 | Temporary System | ||
| 8 | 2.1 | Did the design package provide a detailed temporary system one-line diagram incorporating the temporary system into the existing facility? | 2.1 | ||
| 9 | 2.2 | Did the design package provide a detailed temporary system layout that enables the installation contractor to install the temporary system? | 2.2 | ||
| 3 | Demolition | 3 | Demolition | ||
| 10 | 3.1 | Did the design package provide a demolition plan that includes demolition drawings that clearly show what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project? | 3.1 | ||
| 4 | UPS | 4 | UPS | ||
| 11 | 4.1 | Did the design package describe how the UPS was sized for the project (specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer provided sizing software, or other means)? | 4.1 | ||
| 5 | Electrical | 5 | Electrical | ||
| 12 | 5.1 | Did the design package show a new or existing panel schedule(s)? | 5.1 | ||
| 13 | 5.2 | Did the design package include and show compliance with the applicable NEC, OSHA, and FAA standards, specifications, and orders? | 5.2 | ||
| 14 | 5.3 | Did the design package show an existing and/or new one-line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system? | 5.3 | ||
| 15 | 5.4 | Did the design package provide a detailed cable and conduit schedule? | 5.4 | ||
| 16 | 5.5 | Did the design package provide a detailed equipment layout that shows where the new equipment will be installed with equipment clearances compliant with NEC, OSHA and FAA orders, standards and specifications as applicable? | 5.5 | ||
| Monitor and Control | 6 | Monitor and Control | |||
| 17 | 6.1 | Did the design package show point-to-point control wiring diagram that outlines all the required control circuits for the system to operate? | 6.1 | ||
| 18 | 6.2 | Did the design package show point-to-point control wiring diagram that outlines all the required control circuits for the system to operate? | 6.2 | ||
| 7 | Mechanical | 7 | Mechanical | ||
| 19 | 7.1 | Does the design package take into consideration the HVAC system for the design of the new UPS? | |||
| 8 | Power Analysis | 8 | Power Analysis | ||
| 20 | 8.1 | Did the submitted power analysis studies report or protective device coordination analysis (PDCA) demonstrate a properly coordinated system in multiple operating scenarios and system configurations? | 8.1 | ||
| 21 | 8.2 | Did the submitted Short Circuit Analysis within the design analyze the possible fault currents in the electrical system during short circuit and compare them to the power distribution equipment ratings to determine if they can withstand/interrupt maximum faults? | 8.2 | ||
| 22 | 8.3 | Did the submitted power analysis studies report or arc flash risk assessment (AFRA) identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design? | 8.3 |
| Total Points Received ( Total Number of Yes Response) | 0 | General Notes | |
| Total Number of Questions | 22 | ||
| Score | 0% | ||
| Final Category Rating | Not Qualified | ||
| Scores will be calculated for each applicable factor and sub-factor based on a minimum pass threshold of 60%. The overall score for each section will be determined by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions. If the resulting percentage is 60% or greater, the Offeror will be rated “Qualified” for that program area section. If the resulting percentage falls below 60%, the Offeror will receive a rating of “Not-Qualified” for that program area section. |
Return to Cover Sheet
D-C2-AES
| *If the answer is "NO" for this question, stop evaluation and rate this subfactor program area "Not Qualified" | |||||
| AES Category 2 Design | Additional Notes | ||||
| 1 | Scope | Yes (Y) or No (N) | 1 | Scope | |
| 1 | 1.1 | *Did the submitted project include at least one (1) photovoltaic/battery energy storage system or a standalone battery energy storage system with a capacity ranging from 51 kW to 500 kW? | 1.1 | ||
| 2 | 1.2 | Did the design package include sequenced drawings that illustrate how the system and associated components will be electrically designed in accordance with the SOW, FAA specifications, and standards and/or industry standards listed in Section 2.5 as applicable? | 1.2 | ||
| 2 | Temporary System | 2 | Temporary System | ||
| 3 | 2.1 | Did the design package include a detailed temporary system one-line diagram and layout to integrate the temporary system into the existing facility and guide the installation contractor? | 2.1 | ||
| 3 | Demolition | 3 | Demolition | ||
| 4 | 3.1 | Did the design package provide a demolition plan that includes demolition drawings that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project? | 3.1 | ||
| 4 | Photovoltaic / Battery Energy Storage System stand alone Battery Energy | 4 | Photovoltaic / Battery Energy Storage System stand alone Battery Energy | ||
| 5 | 4.1 | Did the design package describe how the energy resources (photovoltaic/battery energy storage system, standalone battery energy storage system, and wind turbine as applicable) were sized for the project, including whether specifications from the facility owner, a load study, manufacturer-provided sizing software, or other methods were used? | 4.1 | ||
| 5 | Electrical | 5 | Electrical | ||
| 6 | 5.1 | Did the design package show a new or existing panel schedule(s)? | 5.1 | ||
| 7 | 5.2 | Did the design package include and show compliance with the applicable NEC, OSHA, and FAA standards, specifications, and orders, and/or industry standards listed in Section 2.5 as applicable? | 5.2 | ||
| 8 | 5.3 | Did the design package show an existing and/or new one-line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system? | 5.3 | ||
| 9 | 5.4 | Did the design package provide a detailed cable and conduit schedule? | 5.4 | ||
| 10 | 5.5 | Did the design package provide a detailed equipment layout that shows where the new equipment will be installed with equipment clearances compliant with NEC, OSHA and FAA orders, standards and specifications as applicable? | 5.5 | ||
| 11 | 5.6 | Did the design package address points of egress per the NEC (e.g. for equipment rated 1,200 amperes or above)? | 5.6 | ||
| System Monitoring | System Monitoring | ||||
| 12 | 6.1 | Did the design package include local connections for Modbus, preferably Modbus TCP/IP, functioning as a Modbus server (follower), as well as supply Modbus data concerning connection parameters and register mapping for all relevant system components/units? | 6.1 | ||
| 13 | 6.2 | Did the design package provide control drawings that include network diagrams and block diagrams showing overall system integration? | 6.2 | ||
| 7 | Mechanical | 7 | Mechanical | ||
| 14 | 7.1 | Did the design package include detailed mechanical drawings demonstrating that the energy resources (PV array, and standalone battery energy storage system) comply with industry standards, international and local codes? | 7.1 | ||
| 15 | 7.2 | Did the mechanical drawings show detailed system connections, mounting points, and vibration isolation as required to build a fully functioning system to industry standards, international and local code compliant? | 7.2 | ||
| 8 | Power Analysis | 8 | Power Analysis | ||
| 16 | 8.1 | Did the submitted power analysis studies report or protective device coordination analysis (PDCA) demonstrate a properly coordinated system in multiple operating scenarios and system configurations? | 8.1 | ||
| 17 | 8.2 | Did the submitted Short Circuit Analysis within the design analyze the possible fault currents in the electrical system during short circuit and compare them to the power distribution equipment ratings to determine if they can withstand/interrupt maximum faults? | 8.2 | ||
| 18 | 8.3 | Did the submitted power analysis studies report or arc flash risk assessment (AFRA) identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design? | 8.3 |
| Total Points Received ( Total Number of Yes Response) | 0 | ||
| Total Number of Questions | 18 | General Notes | |
| Score | 0% | ||
| Final Category Rating | Not Qualified | ||
| Scores will be calculated for each applicable factor and sub-factor based on a minimum pass threshold of 60%. The overall score for each section will be determined by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions. If the resulting percentage is 60% or greater, the Offeror will be rated “Qualified” for that program area section. If the resulting percentage falls below 60%, the Offeror will receive a rating of “Not-Qualified” for that program area section. |
Return to Cover Sheet
D-C2-CPDS
| *If the answer is "NO" for this question, stop evaluation and rate this subfactor program area "Not Qualified" | |||||
| CPDS Category 2 Design | Additional Notes | ||||
| 1 | Scope | Yes (Y) or No (N) | 1 | Scope | |
| 1 | 1.1 | *Did the submitted project include switchboards/switchgear/panelboards and EITHER at least one engine generator (EG) sized 300 kW or larger OR at least one UPS module sized 60 kVA or larger. | 1.1 | ||
| 2 | 1.2 | Did the design package provide sequenced drawings detailing the removal, replacement and/or new installation of equpment and associated components for each construction stage or phase? | 1.2 | ||
| 3 | 1.3 | Did the design package include electrical installation details that provide detailed electrical information necessary for installation? | 1.3 | ||
| 4 | 1.4 | Did the design package show a control wiring diagram that outlines all of the required control circuits for the system to operate? | 1.4 | ||
| 5 | 1.5 | Did the design package convey an understanding of the FAA specifications, standards, and orders listed in the SOW Sections 2.2 - 2.4, and/or industry standards listed in Section 2.5 as applicable? | 1.5 | ||
| 2 | Temporary System | 2 | Temporary System | ||
| 6 | 2.1 | Did the design package provide a detailed temporary system one-line diagram incorporating the temporary system into the existing facility? | 2.1 | ||
| 7 | 2.2 | Did the design package provide a detailed temporary system layout that enables the installation contractor to install the temporary system? | 2.2 | ||
| 3 | Demolition | 3 | Demolition | ||
| 8 | 3.1 | Did the design package provide a demolition plan that includes demolition drawings that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project? | 3.1 | ||
| 4 | Engine Generator | 4 | Engine Generator | ||
| 9 | 4.1 | Did the design package describe how the EG was sized for the project (specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer-provided sizing software, or other means)? | 4.1 | ||
| 10 | 4.2 | Did the design package include a detailed EG system design that could be used to build a fully-functional system? | 4.2 | ||
| 11 | 4.3 | Did the design package or a new power system include a radiator? | 4.3 | ||
| 5 | UPS | 5 | UPS | ||
| 12 | 5.1 | Did the design package describe how the UPS unit was sized for the project (specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer-provided sizing software or other means)? | 5.1 | ||
| 13 | 5.2 | Did the design package include a detailed UPS system design that could be used to build a fully-functional system? | 5.2 | ||
| 6 | Electrical | 6 | Electrical | ||
| 14 | 6.1 | Did the Design Package show a new or existing panel schedule(s)? | 6.1 | ||
| 15 | 6.2 | Did the design package include and show compliance with the applicable NEC, OSHA, and FAA standards, specifications, and orders? | 6.2 | ||
| 16 | 6.3 | Did the design package show an existing and/or new one-line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system? | 6.3 | ||
| 17 | 6.4 | Did the design package provide a detailed cable and conduit schedule? | 6.4 | ||
| 18 | 6.5 | Did the design package provide a detailed equipment layout that shows where the new equipment will be installed with equipment clearances compliant with NEC, OSHA and FAA orders, standards and specifications as applicable? | 6.5 | ||
| 19 | 6.6 | Did the design package address points of egress per the NEC (e.g. for equipment rated 1,200 amperes or above)? | 6.6 | ||
| 20 | 6.7 | Did the design package provide detailed information for built-in redundancy for system operability and sequence of operations? | 6.7 | ||
| 7 | Monitor and Control | 7 | Monitor and Control | ||
| 21 | 7.1 | Did the Offeror's design package describe experience integrating power control and monitoring systems, SCADA, or systems of a similar type and complexity? | 7.1 | ||
| 22 | 7.2 | Did the design package show point-to-point control wiring diagram that outlines all the required control circuits for the system to operate? | 7.2 | ||
| 23 | 7.3 | Did the design package describe designing new power control and monitoring systems and/or designing modifications to existing power control and monitoring systems? | 7.3 | ||
| 24 | 7.4 | Did the design package power control and monitoring system include power quality monitoring, circuit breaker and electrical distribution equipment control and monitoring? | 7.4 | ||
| 25 | 7.5 | Did the design package power control and monitoring system include engine generator, control and/or monitoring? | 7.5 | ||
| 26 | 7.6 | Did the design package provide control drawings that include network diagrams and block diagrams showing overall system integration? | 7.6 | ||
| 27 | 7.7 | Did the design package include fuel storage monitoring and automated controls for FST system. | 7.7 | ||
| 28 | 7.8 | Did the design package provide control drawings that include network diagrams and block diagrams showing overall system integration? | 7.8 | ||
| 8 | Mechanical | 8 | Mechanical | ||
| 29 | 8.1 | Did the design package provide detailed mechanical drawings that show a fuel system design that could be used to build a fully functioning code-compliant system? | 8.1 | ||
| 30 | 8.2 | Did the design package provide detailed mechanical drawings that show an HVAC system design that could be used to build a fully functioning code compliant system? | 8.2 | ||
| 31 | 8.3 | Did the mechanical drawings show detailed exhaust system connections, mounting points, and vibration isolation as required to build a fully functioning code-compliant system? | 8.3 | ||
| 9 | Power Analysis | 9 | Power Analysis | ||
| 32 | 9.1 | Did the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Protective Device Coordination Analysis (PDCA) demonstrate a properly coordinated system in multiple operating scenarios and system configurations? | 9.1 | ||
| 33 | 9.2 | Did the submitted Short Circuit Analysis within the design analyze the possible fault currents in the electrical system during short circuit and compare them to the power distribution equipment ratings to determine if they can withstand/interrupt maximum faults? | 9.2 | ||
| 34 | 9.3 | Did the submitted power analysis studies report or arc flash risk assessment (AFRA) identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design? | 9.3 |
| Total Points Received ( Total Number of Yes Response) | 0 | ||
| Total Number of Questions | 34 | ||
| Score | 0% | ||
| Final Category Rating | Not Qualified | General Notes | |
| Scores will be calculated for each applicable factor and sub-factor based on a minimum pass threshold of 60%. The overall score for each section will be determined by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions. If the resulting percentage is 60% or greater, the Offeror will be rated “Qualified” for that program area section. If the resulting percentage falls below 60%, the Offeror will receive a rating of “Not-Qualified” for that program area section. |
Return to Cover Sheet
D-C2-EG
| *If the answer is "NO" for this question, stop evaluation and rate this subfactor program area "Not Qualified" | |||||
| EG Category 2 Design | Additional Notes | ||||
| 1 | Scope | Yes (Y) or No (N) | 1 | Scope | |
| 1 | 1.1 | *Did the submitted project include at least one (1) engine generator, sized 300kW or larger? | 1.1 | ||
| 2 | 1.2 | Does the design package include drawings of the key phases of construction (for example: temporary system connection, demolition, and EG/associated equipment installation)? | 1.2 | ||
| 3 | 1.3 | Did the design package include electrical installation details that provide detailed electrical information necessary for installation? | 1.3 | ||
| 4 | 1.4 | Did the design package show a control wiring diagram that outlines all of the required control circuits for the system to operate? | 1.4 | ||
| 5 | 1.5 | Did the design package convey an understanding of the FAA specifications, standards, and orders listed in the SOW Sections 2.2 - 2.4, and/or industry standards listed in Section 2.5 as applicable? | 1.5 | ||
| 2 | Temporary System | 2 | Temporary System | ||
| 6 | 2.1 | Did the design package include a one-line diagram outlining the electrical configuration for the site when temporary equipment (for example: EG, ATS, cables, disconnect switch) is connected? | 2.1 | ||
| 7 | 2.2 | Did the design package provide a detailed temporary system layout that enables the installation contractor to install the temporary system? | 2.2 | ||
| 3 | Demolition | 3 | Demolition | ||
| 8 | 3.1 | Did the design package provide a demolition plan that includes demolition drawings that clearly show what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project? | 3.1 | ||
| 4 | Equipment | 4 | Equipment | ||
| 9 | 4.1 | Did the design package describe how the EG was selected for the project (specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer provided sizing software, etc)? | 4.1 | ||
| 10 | 4.2 | Did the design package show a control wiring diagram that outlines the required control circuits for the EG? | 4.2 | ||
| 11 | 4.3 | Did the design package or data handbook include key details (size, model, general specs/cutsheet) for the new EG being installed, and demonstrate compliance with NEC, OSHA, and industry standards? | 4.3 | ||
| 12 | 4.4 | Did the design package or data handbook include key details (size, model, general specs/cutsheet) for the new ancillary equipment being installed (for example: ATS, load bank), and demonstrate compliance with that meets NEC, OSHA, and industry standards? | 4.4 | ||
| 13 | 4.5 | Did the design package provide a cutover plan describing the manufacturer's testing method for the EG and required site preparation for startup? | 4.5 | ||
| 14 | 4.6 | Does the Design Package provide an Equipment Schedule that shows each piece of equipment and its appropriate rating so that the part/model number given for the equipment can be reproduced or an alternate item can be obtained? | 4.6 | ||
| 5 | Electrical | 5 | Electrical | ||
| 15 | 5.1 | Did the Design Package show a new or existing panel schedule(s)? | 5.1 | ||
| 16 | 5.2 | Did the design package show an existing and/or new one-line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system? | 5.2 | ||
| 17 | 5.3 | Did the design package provide a detailed cable and conduit schedule? | 5.3 | ||
| 18 | 5.4 | Did the design package provide a detailed equipment layout that shows where the new equipment will be installed with equipment clearances compliant with NEC, OSHA and FAA orders, standards and specifications as applicable? | 5.4 | ||
| 19 | 5.5 | Did the design package address points of egress per the NEC (e.g. for equipment rated 1,200 amperes or above)? | 5.5 | ||
| 6 | Monitor and Control | 6 | Monitor and Control | ||
| 20 | 6.1 | Did the Offeror's design package describe experience integrating power control and monitoring systems, SCADA, or systems of a similar type and complexity? | 6.1 | ||
| 21 | 6.2 | Did the design package show point-to-point control wiring diagram that outlines all the required control circuits for the system to operate? | 6.2 | ||
| 22 | 6.3 | Did the design package describe designing new power control and monitoring systems and/or designing modifications to existing power control and monitoring systems? | 6.3 | ||
| 23 | 6.4 | Did the design package power control and monitoring system include engine generator, control and/or monitoring? | 6.4 | ||
| 24 | 6.5 | Did the design package provide control drawings that include network diagrams and block diagrams showing overall system integration? | 6.5 | ||
| 7 | Mechanical | 7 | Mechanical | ||
| 25 | 7.1 | Did the design package include drawings depicting the exhaust system for the EG (for example: duct selection/details, hood selection/details, exhaust fan breakdown, duct support, muffler connection, thimble connection, muffler mounting, and muffler insulation)? | 7.1 | ||
| 8 | Power Analysis | 8 | Power Analysis | ||
| 26 | 8.1 | Did the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Protective Device Coordination Analysis (PDCA) demonstrate a properly coordinated system in multiple operating scenarios and system configurations? | 8.1 | ||
| 27 | 8.2 | Did the submitted Short Circuit Analysis within the design analyze the possible fault currents in the electrical system during short circuit and compare them to the power distribution equipment ratings to determine if they can withstand/interrupt maximum faults? | 8.2 | ||
| 28 | 8.3 | Did the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Arc Flash Risk Assessment (AFRA) identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design? | 8.3 |
| Total Points Received ( Total Number of Yes Response) | 0 | General Notes | |
| Total Number of Questions | 28 | ||
| Score | 0% | ||
| Final Category Rating | Not Qualified | ||
| Scores will be calculated for each applicable factor and sub-factor based on a minimum pass threshold of 60%. The overall score for each section will be determined by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions. If the resulting percentage is 60% or greater, the Offeror will be rated “Qualified” for that program area section. If the resulting percentage falls below 60%, the Offeror will receive a rating of “Not-Qualified” for that program area section. |
Return to Cover Sheet
D-C2-ELD
| *If the answer is "NO" for this question, stop evaluation and rate this subfactor program area "Not Qualified" | |||||
| ELD Category 2 Design | Additional Notes | ||||
| 1 | Scope | Yes (Y) or No (N) | 1 | Scope | |
| 1 | 1.1 | *Did the design package clearly indicate new work including a minimum of 1000 ft of concrete encased duct banks? | 1.1 | ||
| 2 | 1.2 | Did the design package clearly show the inclusion of switchgear that feeds a minimum of two loads per circuit as part of the new work? | 1.2 | ||
| 3 | 1.3 | Did the design package include electrical installation details that provided sufficient information for proper installation? | 1.3 | ||
| 4 | 1.4 | Did the design package provide an airport or field layout that shows cable and conduit and/or trenching routes? | 1.4 | ||
| 5 | 1.5 | Did the design package clearly indicate the inclusion and testing of single phase concentric neutral power cable? | 1.5 | ||
| 6 | 1.6 | Did the design package provide a detailed disconnect rack layout? | 1.6 | ||
| 7 | 1.7 | Did the design package clearly indicate the inclusion of single-phase transformers sized up to 45 kVA as part of the new work? | 1.7 | ||
| 8 | 1.8 | Did the design package clearly indicate the inclusion of manholes as part of the new work? | 1.8 | ||
| 9 | 1.9 | Did the design package show the calculations used to select surge protection as part of the project? | 1.9 | ||
| 2 | Demolition | 2 | Demolition | ||
| 10 | 2.1 | Did the Design Package provide a demolition plan that includes demolition drawings that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project? | 2.1 | ||
| 3 | Electrical | 3 | Electrical | ||
| 11 | 3.1 | Did the design package provide a detailed cable and conduit schedule? | 3.1 | ||
| 12 | 3.2 | Did the design package provide a detailed equipment layout that shows where the new equipment will be installed with equipment clearances compliant with NEC, OSHA and FAA orders, standards and specifications as applicable? | 3.2 | ||
| 13 | 3.3 | Did the design package show an existing and/or new one-line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system? | 3.3 | ||
| 4 | Power Analysis | 4 | Power Analysis | ||
| 14 | 4.1 | Did the Offeror's narrative describe experience with short circuit analysis, protective device coordination analysis, and arc flash risk assessment for low and medium voltage facility power distribution systems for a minimum of two loads? | 4.1 | ||
| 15 | 4.2 | Did the submitted Short Circuit Analysis within the design analyze the possible fault currents in the electrical system during short circuit and compare them to the power distribution equipment ratings to determine if they can withstand/interrupt maximum faults? | 4.2 | ||
| 16 | 4.3 | Did the submitted power analysis studies report or protective device coordination analysis (PDCA) demonstrate a properly coordinated system in multiple operating scenarios and system configurations? | 4.3 | ||
| 17 | 4.4 | Did the submitted power analysis report provide organized time current curves (TCC) for settable protective devices including circuit breakers, relays, and other components for better understanding of coordination within the protective devices? | 4.4 | ||
| 18 | 4.5 | Did the submitted power analysis studies report or arc flash risk assessment (AFRA) identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design? | 4.5 |
| Total Points Received ( Total Number of Yes Response) | 0 | ||
| Total Number of Questions | 13 | ||
| Score | 0% | ||
| Final Category Rating | Not Qualified | ||
| Scores will be calculated for each applicable factor and sub-factor based on a minimum pass threshold of 60%. The overall score for each section will be determined by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions. If the resulting percentage is 60% or greater, the Offeror will be rated “Qualified” for that program area section. If the resulting percentage falls below 60%, the Offeror will receive a rating of “Not-Qualified” for that program area section. | General Notes |
Return to Cover Sheet
D-C2-FST
| *If the answer is "NO" for this question, stop evaluation and rate this subfactor program area "Not Qualified" | |||||
| FST Category 2 Design | Additional Notes | ||||
| 1 | Scope | Yes (Y) or No (N) | 1 | Scope | |
| 1 | 1.1 | *Did the submitted project include the replacement of at least two fuel storage tanks (FST), each 2,000 gallons or larger, with fuel storage monitoring and automated controls? | 1.1 | ||
| 2 | 1.2 | Did the submitted drawings clearly show the sequence of removal of the existing fuel storage tank(s) and the phased integration of the FST system, including piping, day tanks, duplex pump sets, automated fuel-monitoring, and DDC control systems as applicable? | 1.2 | ||
| 3 | 1.3 | Did the design package include all required civil, structural, mechanical, electrical and demolition drawings to support the installation of the FST system, including piping, day tanks, duplex pump sets, automated fuel-monitoring, and DDC control systems as applicable? | 1.3 | ||
| 4 | 1.4 | Did the design package convey an understanding of the FAA specifications, standards, and orders listed in the SOW Sections 2.2 - 2.4, and/or industry standards listed in Section 2.5 as applicable? | 1.4 | ||
| 2 | Temporary System | 2 | Temporary System | ||
| 5 | 2.1 | Did the design package provide a detailed temporary system mechanical one-line diagram showing the temporary fuel tank, associated transfer pumps, and fuel oil supply/return piping? | 2.1 | ||
| 6 | 2.2 | Did the design package provide a detailed layout of the temporary fuel system showing the location of the UL-142 temporary fuel tank, secondary containment, associated transfer pumps, temporary fuel oil supply, and return piping? | 2.2 | ||
| 3 | Demolition | 3 | Demolition | ||
| 7 | 3.1 | Did the design package provide a demolition plan that includes demolition drawings that clearly identify which components of the FST system will be removed and which will be retained as part of the project? | 3.1 | ||
| 8 | 3.2 | Did the design package provide a demolition plan that clearly shows the concrete/asphalt removal limits of disturbance? | 3.2 | ||
| 4 | Electrical | 4 | Electrical | ||
| 9 | 4.1 | Did the Design Package show a new or existing panel schedule(s)? | 4.1 | ||
| 10 | 4.2 | Did the design package provide a detailed cable and conduit schedule? | 4.2 | ||
| 11 | 4.3 | Did the design package provide a detailed equipment layout showing the location of new equipment and required clearances in compliance with NEC, NFPA 70, and OSHA standards? | 4.3 | ||
| 12 | 4.4 | Did the design package address required points of egress in accordance with NFPA 110? | 4.4 | ||
| 13 | 4.5 | Did the design package show grounding in accordance with NEC requirements for the FST system and associated equipment? | 4.5 | ||
| 14 | 4.6 | Did the design package provide an electrical plan and elevation views that show conduit runs and general routing of electrical wiring associated with the fuel monitoring and automated controls? | 4.6 | ||
| 15 | 4.7 | Did the panel schedule drawings demonstrate power diversification to critical controls and DDC equipment? | 4.7 | ||
| 5 | Monitor and Control | 5 | Monitor and Control | ||
| 16 | 5.1 | Did the design package include a point-to-point control wiring diagram showing all required monitoring and automated control connections? | 5.1 | ||
| 17 | 5.2 | Did the design package include a new or upgraded fuel and storage tank monitoring and automated control system, and clearly identify all required modifications to existing DDC components and control panel interfaces? | 5.2 | ||
| 18 | 5.3 | Did the design package show a control wiring diagram that outlines all of the required control circuits for the system to operate? | 5.3 | ||
| 6 | Mechanical | 6 | Mechanical | ||
| 19 | 6.1 | Did the design package provide a mechanical plan and elevation views that show the FST and associated equipment? | 6.1 | ||
| 20 | 6.2 | Did the design package include detailed mechanical drawings for the installation of a fully functional, code-compliant fuel system, including fuel storage tanks, day tanks, fuel piping, vents, pump sets, and associated mechanical equipment as applicable? | 6.2 | ||
| 21 | 6.3 | Did the design package show an existing and/or new one-line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system? | 6.3 | ||
| 22 | 6.4 | Did the design package provide a sequence of operations and mechanical redundancy, such as the interconnection of multiple fuel storage tanks, multiple day tanks, duplex pump sets, and a piping configuration with isolation solenoid valves and bypass capabilities, that supports continued system functionality during individual component failure? | 6.4 | ||
| 7 | Civil | 7 | Civil | ||
| 23 | 7.1 | Did the design package provide civil site drawings indicating access to the site, facility property boundaries, site security controls (e.g. fences and gates), buildings and structures on the site, and types of ground cover (e.g. grass, gravel, asphalt, and concrete)? | 7.1 |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .