Amd_0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

1 4

0002 12/23/2013 2413863CWRR01 4343175

Contracting Officer United States Coast Guard Civil Engineerg Unit Honolulu 300 Ala Moana Blvd., Rm 8-134 Honolulu, HI 96850

HSCG86-13-R-CWRR01

Nov 30, 2013

A. This amendment is issued to incorporate the attached RFI Questions & Answers into this request for proposals HSCG86-13-R-CWRR01 for the Construction of a New Aircraft Rinse Rack.

Responses to additional RFI's will be posted in the next amendment.

B. The date set for receipt of proposals is extended to 2:00 p.m. HST on 1/10/14.

C. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

TAMMY K. KAO

Request for Information‐(Response)

Amendment 0002

CLEAR WATER RINSE RACK, USCG AIR STATION BARBERS POINT, KAPOLEI, HAWAII

31. We are bidding as a subcontractor on the Clear Water Rinse project to multiple general contractors.

We plan on having at least two past performance evaluations submitted showing our experience in aircraft wash systems. Do our past performance evaluations need to list which general contractor(s) the past performance evaluations apply ? OR Will you accept the past performance evaluations with our name on it and apply the evaluations to any general contractor bidding with us as a major subcontractor?

Response: If you are submitting previous past performance evaluations that were completed on a website like CCASS or PPIRS, then you should submit your evaluation to your prime contractor and they should submit the evaluations with their proposal.

If your customers are filling out a blank DD2626 form and are emailing it directly to the contracting officer, then they should state in their email which prime contractor(s) their evaluation should be applied to.

***PRIME CONTRACTORS MUST ALSO CLEARLY ANNOTATE SOMEWHERE IN THE

PAST PERFORMANCE SECTION OF THEIR PROPOSAL THAT “COMPANY XYZ” WILL

BE THEIR SUBCONTRACTOR AND THAT ANY PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

SUBMITTED FOR THAT SUBCONTRACTOR SHOULD BE CONSIDERED WITH THEIR

PROPOSAL. If a prime contractor does not clearly state that on their proposal, we will not consider any past performance evaluations for that subcontractor when evaluating that prime’s proposal. Once a prime contractor puts that statement on their proposal, all past performance information received or otherwise discovered about that subcontractor will be considered in the evaluation of that prime contractor’s proposal.

However, if a prime contractor includes any past performance evaluations or project experience from any particular subcontractor in their proposal, we will automatically also consider all past performance evaluations received and any other information obtained on that subcontractor when we evaluate that prime contractor’s proposal, even if the prime contractor did not include the statement above in their proposal.

ADDITIONALLY, all past performance evaluations or any other information obtained on prime contractors will automatically be considered in the evaluation of that prime contractor.

32. In this solicitation, Section L.12.b.1.a, Past Performance, states that either the prime bidder, or subcontractor must have successfully constructed at least 1 aircraft rinse rack within the last 5 years. If a rinse rack has been installed but currently under commissioning, not yet signed off, would that qualify?

Response: No. We will only consider rinse rack projects that are 100% complete.

33. We have designed and installed aircraft rinse systems but it has been past the 5 year term.

Response: Rinse systems completed more than 5 years ago will not be considered in the evaluation.

34. Would a bidder or subcontractor with numerous completed military rinse systems in the past 5 years, tactical vehicle rinse, or other automated systems with water reclamation be considered?

Response: Automated vehicle rinse system with water reclamation experience would be applicable to this project, therefore we will revise the rating criteria.

Please see response # 35 below.

Other Changes:

35. Changes in Rating Criteria. In paragraph M.2 of the solicitation, the following changes are hereby incorporated:

PAST PERFORMANCE: Rating for “Outstanding” –

Change From, “AND the offeror or its subcontractors have successfully completed one aircraft rinse rack project of the same type (gantry and ground nozzles) and approximate dollar value, or two or more aircraft rinse rack projects of the same type within the past five

(5) years.”

Is hereby Changed To, “AND the offeror or its subcontractors have successfully completed one aircraft rinse rack project of the same type (gantry and ground nozzles rinse rack that is a non-portable, automated system with water reclamation) and approximate dollar value, or two or more aircraft rinse rack projects of the same type within the past five (5) years.”

PAST PERFORMANCE: Rating for “Great” –

Change From, “AND the offeror or its subcontractors have successfully completed at least two aircraft rinse rack projects within the past five (5) years.”

Is hereby Changed To, “AND the offeror or its subcontractors have successfully completed at least one aircraft rinse rack project that is a non-portable, automated system with water reclamation within the past five (5) years.”

PAST PERFORMANCE: Rating for “Good” –

Change From, “AND the offeror or its subcontractors have successfully completed at least one aircraft rinse rack project within the past five (5) years.”

Is hereby Changed To, “AND the offeror or its subcontractors have successfully completed at least one vehicle rinse rack project that is a non-portable, automated system with water reclamation within the past five (5) years.”

NOTE: Your project descriptions/evaluations/pictures must clearly state that your previous rinse racks were for aircraft, contained gantries, were automated, included water reclamation, etc. If it is not clearly mentioned, we may assume that your project did not include these aspects and that your project does not meet the criteria.

All other terms and conditions of the Rating Criteria remain the same.