FBO R5 UEWR.CD BIT QAs 04 27 12.pdf

Industry

Questions and Answers

Questions Government Responses/Answers 201 In draft RFP, Attachment 4, UEWR & CD GFP List (Excel spreadsheet), there are no tabs for the PCIL-UEWR or PCIL-CD implying no UEWR or CD equipment in that lab. Since you are asking us to staff and operate the PCIL, what hardware (HW) do you require the contractor to staff and operate? Was this an oversight?

The contractor is required to have operators for up to two UEWR representations and one COBRA DANE representation for Ground- Based Midcourse GBI flight tests only.

202 The draft RFP states that UEWR software (SW) is maintained under the ITT Sensor contract. Is the actual work performed by ITT in COS or by Raytheon in Woburn, MA under subcontract or both?

The UEWR software is maintained by ITT Sensor. The COBRA DANE software is maintained by Raytheon under the AFTAC contract.

203 In Task Order 0001 SOW, paragraph 3.10.6 states “There are currently no test provisioning planned for this task order”. However, in paragraph 3.9 it states, “As part of the Sensors Test Plan for each test event, the Contractor shall provide details on the test provisioning approach”. Can you clarify?

In the Sensors Test Plan, the contractor will be responsible for identification of items that need to be available (provisioned) for a specific test. However, as stated in Task Order 0001, 3.10.6, the Government does not anticipate any needed provisioning for this task order.