00. _READ ME dRFP ROEs and Questions [dRPFv2].pptx
PPTX presentation 558 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA881923R1000DRAFT
About this file
This document provides a draft request for proposal for professional services to support Space Systems Command, Space Domain Awareness, and Combat Power/Battle Management Command Control and Communications. The solicitation involves multiple task orders for services such as program management support, portfolio reviews, database maintenance, and speechwriting. Proposals are due between March and July 2024, with awards staggered monthly thereafter. Minimum task order values are $500,000, and orders over 80 FTE will be small business set-asides. The document requests industry feedback on changes to requirements, evaluation factors, and a phased task order award schedule to support performance from March 2024 through July 2025. Specific questions address factors and subfactors, minimum order values, quality assurance plans, and off-ramp procedures.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 61 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Hemisphere Draft RFPv2 Rules and Questions Contracting Officer: Ms. Melanie Gipson, melanie.gipson@spaceforce.mil Program Manager: Maj Elizabeth Simkus, elizabeth.simkus@spaceforce.mil 3 October 2023
The Government is soliciting feedback on version 2 of the draft Request for Proposal (dRFP) for Hemisphere As this is the 2nd dRFP the Government is seeking feedback specifically on the updates from the last engagement with industry (posting of Government responses to original dRFP on 31 August) The Government has specific questions in this document that they would like addressed Feedback and answers to questions shall be provided via the Comment Resolution Matrix provided with the dRFP The Government WILL NOT address comments or feedback on parts of the RFP that remain unchanged from the previous versions or that have already been addressed Responses are due by 1600 Pacific on 9 October 2023
Rules of Engagement (ROE)
| Event | Date |
| dRFP v2 | 28 September 2023 |
| dRFP Responses | 9 October 2023 |
| Final RFP Release | 31 October 2023 |
| Proposal Receipt | 5 December 2023 |
| IDIQ Award | 8 March 2024 |
Tentative Schedule
Removed capability gate for Subfactor 1- Staffing and revised to acceptable/unacceptable rating Added measures of merit for Subfactor 4 – Security (para 4.2.4.4) Offerors shall site specific, relevant performance to substantiate the Offeror’s capability to manage a contract with personnel clearance requirements at the TS//SCI or SAP level within the past three (3) years Offerors shall document satisfactory company security performance by providing Security Review results from oversight inspections by DCSA or other cognizant security agency from at least 2 review cycles prior to proposal submittal Question: Are there additional measures of merit that can be added to the existing factors and subfactors that will benefit the Government?
RFP Changes – Section L
Removed language referencing capability gate for Subfactor 1- Staffing and revised to acceptable/unacceptable rating (Para 1.1) All criteria are either acceptable/unacceptable (Para 2) Removed all references to assessment of risk within subfactors (Para 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4) Added new evaluation for security based on requirement to provide security review results
RFP Changes – Section M
Minimum Order of $500 (Para 2.2) Task Orders greater than 80 FTE shall be set aside for small business, if supported by market research (Para 2.5.2) Streamlining of criteria to facilitate evaluation (Appendix A FOPR Template) by removing hiring process subfactor Removed automatic off-ramp after no-bid to 2 subsequent FOPRs Questions:
Is the minimum order sufficient to meet industry needs?
Is there concern with the Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) as a minimum order and evaluation factor?
How can the ordering guide be updated to allow for streamlining of evaluations to support a tight schedule for Task Order Award?
How can the Government improve off-ramp procedures?
RFP Changes – Ordering Guide
Updated CLIN structure From: 5 year base + 5 year option, with facilities CLINs, singular Data & Reports CLIN To: 10 1-year CLINs, Facilities encapsulated by ODCs, updated Data & Reports CLIN to correspond with each CLIN
RFP Changes – Model Contract
Added flexibility to meeting qualifications via tradeoffs or waivers that are approved by the PCO (Para 3.6.6) – n/a to initial awards Added program management support for review and analysis of program defense contractor’s cost and schedule performance deliverables (Para 4.1.5, 4.1.6) Expanded upon engine room support for portfolio strategic review and recommendations (Para 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.4) Added Administrative support for task resolution, database development and maintenance, civilian human resources and awards/decorations assistance, and speech drafting and editing (Para 4.4.2-4.4.6, 4.4.9) Scrubbed for SE&I functions; removed language from digital acquisition and engineering (Para 4.11.3) RFP Changes – PWS
Phased Approach for TO Award
| Task Order | March 2024 | April 2024 | May 2024 | June 2024 | July 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Wk 1 | Wk 2 | Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 | Wk 1 | Wk 2 | Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 | Wk 1 | Wk 2 | Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 | Wk 1 | Wk 2 | Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 | Wk 1 | Wk 2 | Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 | |
| TO 1: SZ-BC Front Office | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TO 2: BCC+BCT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TO 3: SZM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TO 4: SZY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TO 5: SZK+SZP+SZS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TO 6: SZA+SZE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TO 7: MPs: SAF/AQ, SAF/SQ |
The Government intends to stagger Fair Opportunity Proposal Request (FOPR) Releases to support the above schedule Questions:
Is this a schedule that industry will be able to support? (assume 30 days to respond to FOPR) What specific changes can be made to the items delivered as part of the FOPR proposal to facilitate government review?
Review Evaluation
Award Proposal Development
FOPR Release Review Evaluation
Award Proposal Development
FOPR Release Review Evaluation
Award Proposal Development
FOPR Release Review Evaluation
Award Proposal Development
FOPR Release Review Evaluation
Award Proposal Development
FOPR Release Review Evaluation
Award Proposal Development
FOPR Release Review Evaluation
Award Proposal Development
FOPR Release image1.png image3.png image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .