The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
OPS ATTACHMENT 6
PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY BASELINE
MAGNITUDE AND CONTRACT TYPE
| Awarded Contract Value |
| $10 million (M) or more |
| Less than $10M |
| Total Amount of Task Orders Awarded |
| $2.5M or more |
| Less than $2.5M |
| Contract Type |
| Multiple Award/Single Award |
Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Non-IDIQ
COMPLEXITY
| Performance Locations and Geographical Requirements |
| Performance required in multiple states, including at least one state listed in the PWS (Utah, Arizona, Texas) |
| Offeror does not have performance experience in multiple states or does not have performance experience in at least one of the states listed in the PWS (Utah, Arizona, Texas) |
| Variety of Skill Sets/Labor Categories |
| Offered 10 or more skill sets/labor categories |
| Offered less than 10 skill sets/labor categories |
QUALITY OF SERVICES
| Positions Filled with Qualified Personnel |
| Offeror did not have issues filling positions with qualified personnel more than 1 time per year (as identified by prior contract issuers) |
| Offeror had issues filling positions with qualified personnel more than 1 time per year (as identified by prior contract issuers) |
| Filling/Backfilling Positions |
| Offeror did not have issues filling/backfilling positions within required timeframes more than 1 time per year (as identified by prior contract issuers) |
| Offeror had issues filling/backfilling positions within required timeframes more than 1 time per year (as identified by prior contract issuers) |
| Required Deadlines, Due Dates and/or Schedules |
| Offeror did not fail to meet deadlines, due dates, or performance/service schedules more than 1 time per year (as identified by prior contract issuers) |
| Offeror failed to meet deadlines, due dates, or performance/service schedules more than 1 time per year (as identified by prior contract issuers) |
| Employee Turnover |
| Offeror did not frequently or always (as identified by prior contract issuers) experience turnover of personnel |
| Offeror frequently or always (as identified by prior contract issuers) experienced turnover of personnel |
| Level of Satisfaction |
| Offeror’s performance was rated Satisfactory, Very Good or Exceptional (by prior contract issuers) |
| Offeror’s performance was rated Unsatisfactory or Marginal (by prior contract issuers) |
| Recommendation |
| Offeror is recommended for a similar requirement in the future (by prior contract issuers) |
| Offeror is not recommended for a similar requirement in the future (by prior contract issuers) |