TAASC II Pre-Solicitation Conference.ppt
PPT presentation 545 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Professional, Administrative and Management Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8100-12-R-0003
About this file
Pre-Solicitation Conference Slides
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OKLAHOMA CITY
AIR LOGISTICS CENTER
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
TEAM TINKER
Pre-Solicitation Conference Tinker Advisory and Assistance Services Contract (TAASC II)
30 Nov 2011
Agenda
| Opening Remarks |
| Oklahoma Small Business Development Center |
| Program History |
| Goals & Strategy |
| Milestones |
| Discussions/Q&As |
| Source Selection Procedures/Plans |
Opening Remarks Welcome
| Introduction: Government Team Members |
| Contracting Officer: Mary Skaggs |
| Contract Specialist: Nick Risi |
| Price Analyst: Nancy Filippo |
| Program Manager: Stacey Simon |
| TAFB Small Business Office – OC-ALC/SB |
| Joanne Davis, Director |
| 405-739-2601 |
Conference Schedule
One on One Sessions will begin at 12:45
Sheet1
TAASC II Pre-Solicitation - Schedule
Day 1 - November 30, 2011
Time Program
8:00 AM 8:30 AM Registration
8:30 AM 9:20 AM Rose State/TAASC II breifing including Questions and Submitted Questions
9:20 AM 9:30 AM Break
9:30 AM 10:30 AM Small Business Presentations
10:30 AM 10:45 AM Break
10:45 AM 11:45 AM Source Selection Procedures Presentation
11:45 AM 12:45 PM Lunch
One on One Sessions
Time Contractor
1 12:45 PM 1:00 PM Alpha-Omega Change Engineering, INC
2 1:00 PM 1:15 PM Bernard Technical Services
3 1:15 PM 1:30 PM S&K Aerospace
4 1:30 PM 1:45 PM Delta Solutions & Strategies, LLC
5 1:45 PM 2:00 PM Peerless Technologies Corp
- 2:00 PM 2:10 PM Break
6 2:10 PM 2:25 PM RJ Lee Group
7 2:25 PM 2:40 PM Sansara LLC
8 2:40 PM 2:55 PM Booz Allen Hamilton
9 2:55 PM 3:10 PM
10 3:10 PM 3:25 PM CNI Aviation, LLC
Day 2 - December 1, 2011
One on One Sessions
Time Contractor
11 8:30 AM 8:45 AM GDH Government Services
12 8:45 AM 9:00 AM Hebco, INC
13 9:00 AM 9:15 AM I.S. Technologies dba Computer System Designers
- 9:15 AM 9:25 AM Break
14 9:25 AM 9:40 AM KeyBridge Technologies, INC
15 9:40 AM 9:55 AM Leader Communications, INC
16 9:55 AM 10:10 AM Sumaria Systems, INC
17 10:10 AM 10:25 AM Virtual Technology Services, LLC
Sheet2
Sheet3
Rose State College Oklahoma Small Business Development Center Victoria Armstrong, CEcD Voice: 405-733-7348 Fax: 405-733-7586 E-mail: varmstrong@rose.edu Web Site: www.rose/edu/commfriend/bizdev
Tinker Advisory & Assistance Services Contract (TAASC) History
PROGRAM BACKGROUND
| Tinker Advisory and Assistance Contract (TAASC) |
| Consolidated contracting effort |
| Generated from OC-ALC/CC |
| Increased visibility and insight to A&AS tasks |
| Reduced base wide A&AS costs due to the synergy of the efforts |
| OC-ALC customers mandated to use TAASC |
TAASC was Developed to achieve better service, cost savings, and visibility of A&AS expenditures across the center
| Current Contract: FA8101-07-D-0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0006 |
| Contractors |
| 0002 - CNI Aviation |
| 0003 - Odyssey Systems Consulting Group |
| 0004 - HEBCO |
| 0005 - Leader Communications |
| 0006 - Virtual Technology Services |
| Non-Commercial |
| Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Time & Material (T&M), Cost Reimbursable, Fixed Price Award Fee (FPAF) |
| Total obligated amount: $80M |
| Performance based under the guidance of AFI 63-124 |
| Does not include personal services or inherently governmental functions |
| Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts |
| 100% Small business set-aside |
| Period of performance: 14 Mar 2007 through 13 Mar 2012 |
| Five year Basic Contract |
| Options are at the Task Order level |
REQUIREMENTS DESCRIPTION
| Provide Advisory and Assistance Services (A&AS) for OC-ALC and Tenant Organizations |
| Management and Professional Support Services |
| Services that provide management assistance, advice, or training for the efficient and effective management and operation of organizations, activities, or systems |
| Studies, Analysis, and Evaluations |
| Services that provide organized, analytical assessments to understand or evaluate complex issues to improve policy development, decision making, management, or administration |
| Engineering and Technical Services |
| Services that take the form of advice, assistance, training, or hands-on training necessary to maintain and operate fielded weapon systems, equipment, and components at design or required levels of effectiveness |
| Functional Categories | |
| Program Management Support | Logistics Support |
| Administrative Management Support | Technical Order Management Support |
| Configuration Management Support | Contracting Closeout Support |
| Data Management Support | Audit Support |
| Facilitation Support | Engineering Support |
| Training Support | Manufacturing Support |
| Financial Management Support | Subject Matter Expert |
| A&AS Labor Categories | |
| Program Manager | Operations Analyst |
| Program Analyst | Software Analyst |
| Administrative Assistant (Not Secretarial) | Software Engineer |
| Facilitation Manager | Chemical Engineer |
| Budget/Financial Analyst | Systems Engineer |
| Logistician | Aerospace Engineer |
| Equipment Specialist | Mechanical Engineer |
| Auditor | Electronic/Electrical Engineer |
| Technical Writer | Training Support Specialist |
| Contracting Close-out Specialist | Subject Matter Expert |
| Item Manager |
TAASC II
Goals & Strategy
Goals Goals
| Flexible A&AS contract vehicle |
| Appropriate set of labor categories/skills |
| Available to OC-ALC, tenants, WR-ALC, OO-ALC (decentralized ordering) |
Potential Benefits
| Continue to increase visibility and insight to A&AS tasks across the center |
| Reduce base wide A&AS costs due to synergy of efforts |
| Centralized management of all OC-ALC A&AS |
Market Research
| Extensive Market Research Accomplished |
| Small Business Capability Survey |
| RFI |
| Industry Day |
| One-on-one industry sessions |
| Current Contract |
| Process Improvements/Lessons Learned |
| (Multi Functional Team) MFT Input |
| User Feedback (Quality Assurance Personnel and Contracting Officer Representatives) |
| Utilized Internet, E-mail, Interviews , Market Research Questionnaires, and Telephone conversations with other bases |
Acquisition Strategy
TAASC II
| Competitive procurement |
| Small Business Set Aside, NAICS Code 541330 |
| Five Year Ordering Period |
| Individual Task Orders for up to three years (basic year with two one year options) |
Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs)
0001 - Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Labor On-Site OC-ALC 0002 - FFP Labor Off-Site OC-ALC 0003 - FFP Labor On-Site OO-ALC 0004 - FFP Labor Off-Site OO-ALC 0005 - FFP Labor On-Site WR-ALC 0006 - FFP Labor Off-Site WR-ALC
0007 - Time and Material (T&M) Labor On-Site OC-ALC 0008 - T&M Labor Off-Site OC-ALC 0009 - T&M Labor On-Site OO-ALC 0010 - T&M Labor Off-Site OO-ALC 0011 - T&M Labor On-Site WR-ALC 0012 - T&M Labor Off-Site WR-ALC
0013 - Data - Not Separately Priced (NSP)
0014 - Travel (Cost reimbursement): Allowable travel costs (i.e., conferences, site visits, exercises, training)
TAASC II
Performance-Based requirements document
| Government Furnished Property |
| Office Space (Tinker AFB Form 534) |
| Computers |
| Service Contract Act |
| Managed by A&AS Program Office at OC-ALC |
| Limited decentralized ordering |
| WR-ALC approx 5% of ceiling |
| OO-ALC approx 5% of ceiling |
TAASC II
| Source Selection Procedures |
| Best-Value Continuum |
| Goal: Best Value Decision |
| Trade-Off Source Selection (Price/Past Performance) |
| Best-Value Continuum Approach |
| Factor 1: Technical |
| Resource Management |
| Program Management |
| Sample Task Implementation Proposal |
| Factor 2: Past Performance |
| Factor 3: Cost/Price |
TAASC II
| Price Performance Trade Off (PPT) |
| “Satisfactory” is the highest rating for past performance |
| Award will be made to 4-5 offerors representing the best value to the Government – potential trade-off between Past Performance/Price |
| Must be determined technically acceptable to be eligible for award |
Intend to Award without Discussions Acquisition Center of Excellence involvement
TAASC II
Milestones
Notional Milestones
| EVENT | MILESTONE | ACTUAL |
| Draft PWS/RFP to Industry | 18 Nov 11 | 18 Nov 11 |
| Pre-Solicitation Conference | 30 Nov – 01 Dec 11 | 30 Nov – 01 Dec 11 |
| Release Formal RFP | 19 Dec 11 | |
| Receipt of Proposals | 31 Jan 12 | |
| Discussions (if necessary) | 27 Mar – 30 Apr 12 | |
| Award | 18 Jun 12 |
Discussions/Q&A
Submitted Questions Should pricing information be included in the technical volume per Section L 4.2.4.b?
Section L 5.3, Relevant Contracts conflicts with ITO Attachment 1.1. Is Section L 5.3 the correct reference?
Are all 5 volumes due on one CD? If separate CDs, can Master TOC be .pdf?
What binding should be used?
Can we provide greater detail for the sample task?
Can the PPIS font be reduced or a different format used for efficiency?
Sample Task: Does each functional requirement involve specific knowledge or general knowledge of the function areas in Sample Task PWS 1.1?
Are the hours in Labor Category Matrix CLIN 0001 set by government or can offerors adjust hours?
Will AFMC Re-org have impact on this solicitations?
Section L 2.1.6 – Responses in 3-ring binders or loose papers packaged in sealed envelopes?
Section L 5.3 Relevant Contracts, Please define/clarify “key or critical portions” Due to reorganization, will TAASC II be different from TAASC I in terms of scope or skill mix?
Will RFP have organizational terms to match reorganization?
In PWS, does term “shall assist” indicate government lead effort with TAASC support contractors?
Is TAASC mandatory for studies where contractor delivers the results of a wholly independent analysis?
Does executive summary have a page count requirement?
Can PWS 1.7.1 be prepared at contract level instead of TO level?
Section L 6.1.6 Can rates breakdown be submitted directly to the Government rather than through the prime?
Can TOs under the same IDIQ be used for separate Past Performance citations?
Further explanation of Best Value selection criteria and procedure
Is the Sample Task order a live or notional Task Order?
Are the resume pages for the sample task order implementation plan subject to the 75 page limit of the Technical proposal volume?
Will TAASC Office relax resume requirements for Sample Task Order and replace with requiring identification of key personnel for the IDIQ with a 180 day non-substitution clause?
Where should the 14 functional areas be addressed in the proposal?
Open Question & Answer Session
TEAM TINKER
Source Selection Procedures/Plans Mr. Van Garmon Source Selection Advisor Acquisition Center of Excellence
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .